Performance evaluation of delefilcon a water gradient daily disposable contact lenses in first-time contact lens wearers

Purpose

To evaluate the tolerability of and subject and investigator satisfaction with delefilcon A (DAILIES TOTAL1^®) daily disposable contact lenses in first-time contact lens wearers.

Corneal epithelial thickness and corneal curvature changes during the day: The effects of daily disposable contact lens wear

PurposeTo evaluate the changes in corneal epithelial thickness and corneal anterior and posterior curvatures during the day, and the effect of wearing daily disposable soft contact lenses.MethodsThirty-two healthy volunteers were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. At the baseline visit, corneal and epithelial thickness maps (OCT; Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) and keratometric measurements (Pentacam, Oculus, GmbH, Germany) were performed in the morning and in the afternoon (8 hours after). Then, each subject was fitted with the following brands of daily disposable contact lenses in random order: Dailies Total 1 (Delefilcon A), Dailies Aqua Comfort (Nelfilcon A), TruEye (Narafilcon A) and Biotrue Oneday (Nesofilcon A) on different days. All fitted lenses had a power of −3.00 diopters (D). Measurements were repeated before putting the contact lens on and after an-eight-hour contact lens wear.ResultsWith no lens wear, the anterior topographic indices showed significant steepening [Kflat: p < 0.0001; Ksteep: p < 0.0001 and maximum keratometry value (Kmax): p = 0.04] and the corneal thickness significantly decreased in the central and temporal portion of the cornea in the afternoon. There were no significant changes in the posterior topographical indices and corneal epithelial thickness. With contact lens wear, no significant change occurred in the corneal and epithelial thickness, and the anterior and posterior curvatures during the day (all p values >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the epithelial thickness among the groups wearing different contact lens types (p > 0.05).ConclusionsAnterior corneal topographic indices steepen depending on the natural diurnal variations. Daily wear of soft contact lenses appears to mask this steepening. The corneal epithelial thickness is not affected by daily disposable soft contact lenses.     

Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft daily disposable contact lenses in neophyte wearers

PurposeDespite the widespread practice of gradually adapting all new soft contact lens wearers (neophytes), there is little evidence-based research underpinning such practice. This work determined if a gradual adaptation period is necessary for neophytes when fitted with modern hydrogel or silicone-hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.MethodAt four sites, neophytes (19–32 years) were randomly assigned to an adaptation schedule: fast (10 h wear from the first day) or gradual (4 h on the first day, increasing their wear-time by 2 h on each subsequent day until they had reached 10 h) with hydrogel (n = 24 fast; n = 21 gradual) or silicone-hydrogel (n = 10 fast; n = 10 gradual) contact lenses. Masked investigators graded ocular surface physiology and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT). A range of subjective scores (using 0–100 visual analogue scales) were recorded at the initial visit and after 10 h of lens wear, 4–6 days and 12–14 days after initial fitting. Subjective scores were also repeated after 7 days.ResultsThere was no difference (p > 0.05) in ocular surface physiology between the fast and gradual adaptation groups at any time point in either lens type. NIBUT was similar at all time points for both adaptation groups in both lens types with the exception that the gradual adaptation silicone-hydrogel wearers had a slightly longer NIBUT (p = 0.007) than the fast adaptation group at 12-14 days. Subjective scores were also similar across the visits and lens types with the exception of ‘lens awareness’ and ‘ease of lens removal’ which were better (p < 0.05) in the fast compared with the gradual adaptation hydrogel lens group at day 7. Additionally, ‘end-of-day discomfort’ was better (p = 0.02) in the fast compared with the gradual adaptation hydrogel lens group at 12–14 days.ConclusionThere appears to be no benefit in daily disposable soft contact lens adaptation for neophytes with modern contact lens materials.     

In vitro power profiles of daily disposable contact lenses

PurposeTo evaluate and compare the distribution of refractive power within the optic zone of different soft contact lenses and to investigate the effect of lens decentration on the power profiles.MethodsThe Nimo TR1504 instrument was used to measure the optical power across different aperture diameters (from 1.5 mm to 5.5 mm in steps of 0.5 mm) of four daily disposable contact lenses: DAILIES TOTAL1, Proclear 1-Day, SofLens daily disposable and 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST. Measurements were performed using a wet cell. Power data were evaluated when contact lenses were in its centered position and after inducing different amounts of lens decentration (from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm in steps of 0.2 mm).ResultsAll contact lenses showed an increase – more negative – in lens power with distance from the lens center. The amount of change varied depending on the lens. It was about 10% of lens power for DAILIES TOTAL1 (−0.29 diopters (D)), SofLens daily disposable (−0.36 D), and Proclear 1-Day (−0.32 D) whereas 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST showed a percentage variation of 3.3% (−0.10 D). After inducing a lens decentration up to 1 mm, the power curves were shifted in the negative direction. However, the change obtained in lens power compared with well-centered position was always lower than a quarter of diopter both for all the lenses and aperture diameters.ConclusionsOur results showed a variation of the refractive power from the lens center, becoming more negative toward the periphery, with a negligible effect of the decentration for all disposable contact lenses studied.     

Prescribing daily disposable contact lenses in the UK.

Patterns of prescribing daily disposable contact lenses in the UK were determined by mining through data gathered from annual contact lens fitting surveys conducted over the past 12 years. Spherical, toric and multifocal design daily disposable lenses represent a substantial proportion of all contact lenses prescribed, reflecting the significant ocular health and lifestyle advantages offered by this lens category.     

Variation in sag values in daily disposable,reusable and toric soft contact lenses

PurposeWhile knowledge of the ocular surface sagittal height (OC-SAG) is increasing with newer instrumentation, understanding of soft lens sag values (CL-SAG) in daily clinical practice is limited. This study aimed to report the differences in CL-SAG of a large collection of daily disposable (DD), reusable (2-week and 4-week replacement) and toric lens designs.Methods12 different spherical DD and 15 reusable lens types were analysed (labelled power −3.00D); 17 different toric lens types analysed (6 DD and 11 reusable) in −3.00D =C 0.75 × 180. Posterior CL-SAG was measured directly using a spectral domain OCT-based instrument (Optimec is830).ResultsThe range in CL-SAG for DDs was 3,398-3,912 microns, for reusable lenses 3,372-4,004 microns and for toric lenses 3,536-4,157 microns. Lens diameter and BC together influence CL-SAG values. For lenses with the same labelled base curve (BC), the maximum difference in the DD group was 264 microns, in the reusable group 418 microns and in the toric group 345 microns. Three lens designs within the DD group and five in the reusable group offer two BCs, with an average variation (±SD) in CL-SAG of 276 ± 39 microns; one toric lens with two BCs showed a 377-micron difference.ConclusionsMarked differences in CL-SAG values were found in this study, also between lenses of the same BC. While ECPs should be aware that diameter and BC together influence CL-SAG, this also indicates that lens substitution based on BC alone could result in substantial differences in CL-SAG, with a potential impact on lens fit. Lens designs offering two BCs showed a somewhat narrow band in absolute terms in CL-SAG, and switching from a spherical to a toric lens of the same lens manufacturer could result in a significant change in CL-SAG.     

An investigation into disposal and recycling options for daily disposable and monthly replacement soft contact lens modalities

PurposeTo examine the annualised waste and end-of-life disposal options with two representative soft contact lens (CL) modalities.MethodsThe component parts of two representative soft CL modalities were catalogued, separated, weighed and inspected for material identification: somofilcon A soft CLs (clariti elite, CooperVision Inc.) used with multi-purpose solution (MPS) (All in one Light, CooperVision Inc.) and somofilcon A CLs (clariti 1 day, CooperVision Inc). Using a model that assumed compliant wear and care of CLs, the mass of material solid waste generated by CL use over a year was calculated. Disposal options were explored using household and specialist recycling streams in order to develop recommendations for responsible disposal of CL waste.ResultsFull-time daily disposable (DD) CL wear generates 1.06 kg of waste annually compared to 0.83 kg generated by reusable-monthly replacement daily wear (‘reusable’) CLs. Plastic was the dominant material in both modalities. With full-time use of DD CLs, 64% of waste by mass was plastic blister trays. For full-time use of reusable CLs, where figures from lens and MPS packaging are combined, plastics accounted for 67% of waste by mass. MPS bottles alone made up almost half the waste (45%) associated with full-time reusable CL wear.ConclusionFull-time DD wear generates 27% more waste annually than full-time reusable lens wear. Reusable CL wearers can recycle 78% of waste at home. DD lens wearers have access to recycling options that allow them to recycle 100% of CL related waste. Full-time CL lens wear represents just 0.20–0.26% of the 412 kg of household waste generated per person, per year in the United Kingdom. Worn CLs should never be disposed of down the sink or lavatory. CL wearers should be aware of responsible end-of-life recycling and disposal options for all CL waste.     

Ten years of disposable contact lenses - a review of benefits and risks

The performance and benefits as well as the risks and complications of disposable soft lenses (single use disposable or re-used 2-4 weeks) are reviewed in relation to corneal physiology. Modern designs and advanced technology have resulted in disposable lenses providing excellent visual performance. Fewer subjective symptoms (e.g. dryness and grittiness), slit-lamp findings (such as injection and tarsal abnormalities), and inflammatory responses (papillary conjunctivitis; contact lens-induced acute red eye) have been reported with disposable lenses than with conventional soft lenses. The risk of contact lens-induced keratitis (CLIK) has been reported to be higher for daily wear of disposable lenses than for other lens types by UK investigators. Other studies have shown the risk of CLIK with disposable lenses to be equal to that with conventional soft lenses, and in two extensive Swedish studies, the incidence of severe keratitis was found to be significantly lower for daily wear (DW) of disposable lenses than for DW of conventional soft and rigid gas permeable lenses. Both the total complication rate and the number of unscheduled visits are found to be significantly lower for disposable lenses than for conventional soft lenses in several studies. Comfort has been reported to be significantly better and overall satisfaction significantly greater with disposable lenses than with conventional soft lenses according to many studies. These may be important reasons why the success rate for disposable lens wear is reported to be fairly high, generally 70-90%. The importance of appropriate care for 're-usable disposable lenses' must be stressed. One day disposable lenses, if used as directed, will eliminate the risk factors of inadequate cleaning and disinfection as well as contaminated lens cases.     

Health beliefs affect the correct replacement of daily disposable contact lenses: Predicting compliance with the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour

Purpose

To assess the compliance of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses (DDCLs) wearers with replacing lenses at a manufacturer-recommended replacement frequency. To evaluate the ability of two different Health Behavioural Theories (HBT), The Health Belief Model (HBM) and The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), in predicting compliance.

A multi-country assessment of compliance with daily disposable contact lens wear

PurposeTo investigate compliance with daily disposable contact lens (DDCL) wear and investigate re-use of lenses according to country and DDCL material worn.MethodsOptometrists invited eligible DDCL patients from their practices to participate in a survey on DDCL wear in Australia, Norway, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). Eligible participants completed an online or paper version of the survey.Results805 participants completed the survey (96% online): Australia 13%, Norway 32%, UK 17%, US 38%. The median age was 38 years; 66% were female. Silicone hydrogel (SiHy) DDCLs were worn by 14%. Overall, 9% were non-compliant with DDCL replacement; Australia 18%, US 12%, UK 7% and Norway 4%. There were no differences with respect to sex, years of contact lens wear experience or DDCL material (SiHy versus hydrogels). The primary reason for re-use was “to save money” (60%). Re-use of DDCLs resulted in inferior comfort at insertion and prior to lens removal (p = 0.001). 75% reported occasional napping and 28% reported sleeping overnight for at least one night in the preceding month, while wearing their DDCLs.ConclusionNon-compliance with replacement of DDCLs occurred in all countries investigated; the rate was highest in Australia and lowest in Norway. Re-use of DDCLs was associated with reduced comfort. DDCL wearers often reported wearing lenses overnight. It is important for optometrists to counsel their patients on the importance of appropriate lens wear and replacement for DDCLs.     

The morphology of corneal endothelial cells in long term soft contact lens wearers in Kuala Lumpur

PurposeTo analyse and compare the alterations in corneal endothelium morphology induced by different materials and durations of wearing soft contact lenses (CL) among young adults living in Kuala Lumpur.MethodsHealthy soft CL wearers were invited to participate in this study. Visual acuity (VA) was measured using the Snellen chart, and subjective refraction was performed using cross-cylinder technique. Standard ocular assessments were conducted using a slit lamp biomicroscope and morphology of corneal endothelial cells (endothelial cell density, ECD, coefficient variation, COV, hexagonality, HEX and central corneal thickness, CCT) were evaluated using a non-contact specular microscope. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and data from the right eye only is included.ResultsA total of 72 subjects (32 SiHy and 40 HCL wearers) and 24 non-CL wearers (control) participated in this study. The gender distribution for study subjects was 13 males and 59 females, with a mean age 22.15 ± 1.84 years old. The mean refraction was −1.86 ± 1.25DS. The duration of wearing CL ranged from 1 to 9 years. Subjects were later divided into 2 groups following duration of CL wear: Group 1 (<5 years) and Group 2 (≥5 years) for analysis purposes. Statistical analysis showed significant alterations in ECD, COV and HEX of CL wearers (p < 0.05), with more changes found in HCL and Group 2 wearers. No significant change was found in CCT.ConclusionThis study concludes that soft CL wear induced alterations in the morphology of corneal endothelial cells. Contact lens material and duration of CL wear (in years) are factors that affect the alterations. Optometrists are recommended to regularly evaluate the morphology of corneal endothelial cells in CL wearers and provide necessary intervention when required.     

In-vitro dewetting properties of planned replacement and daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses

AimTo compare the in-vitro videokeratoscopic surface dewetting properties of new-generation silicone hydrogel (SiH) planned replacement contact lenses (CL) with those of daily disposable CLs.MethodA chrome coated cornea model was used for the in-vitro evaluation of surface dewetting. Pre-lens and post-lens film layers were formed by instilling a normal preservative-free normal saline solution (PFNs) (0.9 %) before and after the placement of the CL on the model cornea. The tests were carried out on fanfilcon A, lotrafilcon B, samfilcon A, and senofilcon A lenses, as well as such daily disposable lenses as delefilcon, nesofilcon A and senofilcon one day. Using videokeratoscopic methods, images were obtained at 30-second intervals up to 180 s in the lens and control groups and were analyzed by the ImajeJ® program.ResultsThe mean measured area of the keratoscopic rings was largest in the fanfilcon group (67.56 mm²), followed by 61.53 mm² in the lotrafilcon A group and 64.60 mm² in the samfilcon group, while the smallest area was measured in the senofilcon A group, at 56.90 mm². The area was measured as 64.33, 63.09 and 68.39 mm² for the delefilcon, nesofilcon and Senofilcon one day CLs, respectively. The dewetting patterns and properties differed in the CL groups (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were found between the measured areas of the planned replacement and daily disposable CL groups (p > 0.05).DiscussionVideokeratoscopy using in-vitro cornea models has been identified as a reproducible and reliable method for the analysis of the surface dewetting of CLs. The dewetting characteristics of CL groups have been found to differ from each other, despite all being produced from SiH materials. The surface wetting coating has been shown to affect CL dewetting performance.     

Silicone hydrogel daily disposable benefits: The evidence

Daily disposable (DD) contact lenses first came to the market approximately 25 years ago and eye care professionals (ECPs) started prescribing silicone hydrogel (SiH) contact lenses, primarily for extended or continuous wear, approximately 20 years ago. It has now been over ten years since SiH DD contact lenses have been available, and while SiH materials are routinely prescribed by ECPs for reusable daily wear, hydrogel materials are still frequently selected for the DD modality of contact lens wear. This article reviews the evidence to support the benefits of both a DD modality and SiH materials and how patients’ needs may be met with SiH DD contact lenses, with respect to clinical performance, health outcomes, satisfaction, compliance and convenience. Factors which may enable or constrain ECPs from prescribing SiH DD contact lenses, as opposed to hydrogel DD and reusable contact lenses, for more of their patients are discussed with the objective of providing ECPs with a greater understanding of the advantages that can be afforded by prescribing SiH DD contact lenses to both their new and existing contact lens wearers.     

Trends in the use of silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily wear

Although the first silicone hydrogel contact lenses introduced onto the world contact lens market in 1999 held approval for both daily wear and extended wear use, the latter modality was promoted much more heavily by the manufacturers. The first silicone hydrogel lenses specifically promoted for daily wear were introduced in 2003. Data that we have gathered from annual contact lens fitting surveys demonstrate an immediate increase in market share whereby this lens type now represents more than one-third of soft lens fits in the United Kingdom. The success of this lens category is attributed to the health and safety benefits of silicone hydrogel materials and the positive impact of lens manufacturers by way of the effective marketing and distribution of these products.     

Randomised controlled trial of corneal vs. scleral rigid gas permeable contact lenses for keratoconus and other ectatic corneal disorders

PurposeTo compare the comfort and visual performance of corneal rigid gas permeable contact lenses (CoL) and scleral rigid gas permeable contact lenses (SL) in participants with corneal ectasia, successfully wearing “habitual” CoL.MethodsIn a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a 2 × 2 crossover, 34 participants were recruited and randomised into two groups. Group 1 (sequence AB), were fitted in period 1, with new CoL and after a 4-week washout period, in which habitual CoL were worn, were fitted with and crossed-over to SL, period 2. Group 2 (sequence BA), were first fitted with SL in period 1 and after a washout period of 4 weeks, crossed-over to new CoL, period 2. The median lengths in weeks of Periods 1 and 2 were: 17.5 (IQR 12.4) and 14.5 (IQR 6.2) respectively. The outcome measures for visual performance were best corrected visual acuity and the contrast sensitivity function. Vision related quality of life (Qol) was assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questioannaire-25 and reported subjective perception of vision (SPV) and reported subjective perception of comfort (SPC) scores, recorded on a scale from 1–10. The final outcome measure was the selection of the preferred lens type at the completion of the RCT.ResultsFor the 30 who completed the trial, significantly higher SPC scores were found for SL compared to CoL (p = 0.002). Significantly higher SPC scores for CoL were found in participants who selected CoL as their preferred lens for future use, compared to those who selected SL (p = 0.009). All other outcomes exhibited no significant difference between the experimental lenses. There was no significant difference (p=0.86) in the proportion preferring CoL (53%) and SL (47%).ConclusionSignificantly better comfort was reported for SL compared with CoL. Significantly higher comfort in CoL was found in those who preferred CoL, than those who preferred SL. Successful CoL wearers whose SPC in CoL is <7 are likely to achieve better comfort with SL. On average, successful CoL wearers found SL more comfortable and there are unlikely to be any significant visual or visual Qol advantage or disadvantage in refitting successful CoL wearers with keratoconus and other corneal ectasia disorders, with SL and vice versa.     

Spherical aberration in contact lens wear

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present studies was to investigate the effect on spherical aberration of different non custom-made contact lenses, both with and without aberration control. METHODS: A wavefront analyser (Zywave, Bausch & Lomb) was used to measure the aberrations in each subject's right eye uncorrected and with the different contact lenses. The first study evaluated residual spherical aberration with a standard lens (Focus Dailies Disposable, Ciba Vision) and with an aberration controlled contact lens (ACCL) (Definition AC, Optical Connection Inc.). The second study evaluated the residual spherical aberrations with a monthly disposable silicone hydrogel lens with aberration reduction (PureVision, Bausch & Lomb). RESULTS: Uncorrected spherical aberration was positive for all pupil sizes in both studies. In the first study, residual spherical aberration was close to zero with the standard lens for all pupil sizes whereas the ACCL over-corrected spherical aberration. The results of the second study showed that the monthly disposable lens also over-corrected the aberration making it negative. The changes in aberration were statistically significant (p<0.05) with all lenses. CONCLUSION: Since the amount of aberration varies individually we suggest that aberrations should be measured with lenses on the eye if the aim is to change spherical aberration in a certain direction.     

Ocular health of children wearing daily disposable contact lenses over a 6-year period

PurposeTo report on the ocular health and safety of children fit with soft hydrogel daily-disposable contact lenses, and followed for 6-years in a double-masked clinical trial investigating the performance of a dual-focus contact lens designed to control myopia progression.MethodsChildren aged 8−12 years, naïve to contact lens wear, were enrolled across four international sites. During years 1–3, children were randomised to either MiSight® 1 day or Proclear® 1 day (both omafilcon A, CooperVision, Inc.). The lenses were identical in material and geometry except for the front optical zone design. At the end of year-3, all those wearing Proclear 1 day were switched to MiSight 1 day, therefore all wore MiSight 1 day in years 4−6. Subjects agreed to wear the lenses at least 10-hours/day, 6-days/week. After dispensing, study visits were at 1-week, 1-month, 6-months and every 6-months until 6-years. At each visit, ocular measurements and subjective responses were recorded. Biomicroscopy used 0–4 grading scales; grade 0 represented no findings.Results144 children were enrolled: 69F:75M; mean age 10.1 years; mean cycloplegic spherical-equivalent refraction -2.11D; ethnicities included 34 East-Asian, 12 West-Asian, and 79 Caucasian. 92 completed the 6-years. Only three subjects discontinued due to an ocular adverse event (AE). No contact lens related AEs were classified as serious. The incidence rate of infiltrative AEs was 0.61% (6.1/1000 wearing-years; 95%CI: 0.24%–1.57%). The most common biomicroscopy findings were limbal, bulbar and tarsal hyperaemia and tarsal roughness. 99% of all biomicroscopy findings were grade-1 or lower. After 6-years of lens wear, ocular health by biomicroscopy was similar to pre-lens wear.ConclusionsAcross the 6-years, there were no contact lens related serious AEs and biomicroscopy showed no significant changes. Results suggest that children this age can successfully wear daily-disposable hydrogel contact lenses with minimal impact on ocular physiology.     

Evaluation of daily disposable senofilcon A contact lenses in a symptomatic population

PurposeTo evaluate the comfort performance of ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe? Technology among symptomatic contact lens wearers by using Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) comfort scores and Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire 8 (CLDEQ-8) discomfort and dryness scores.MethodsThree clinical trials evaluated comfort and dryness when refitting symptomatic contact lens wearers to ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe? lenses. This analysis combined the CLUE comfort and CLDEQ-8 scores obtained at baseline and 2-week follow-up and compared average scores between visits. Subjects were grouped by habitual lens modality (daily disposable or daily wear reusable) and habitual lens material (silicone hydrogel or hydrogel). The analysis included data from 107 subjects.ResultsSignificant increases in mean CLUE comfort scores between baseline and 2–week follow-up occurred in all subject groups across habitual lens modality and material, indicating an improvement in overall comfort. CLUE comfort score improved clinically (≥5-point increase) among 75.7% of subjects (81/107). Similarly, significant decrease in mean CLDEQ-8 scores between baseline and 2-week follow-up occurred in all subject groups, indicating a decrease in the prevalence of dryness and discomfort symptoms. CLDEQ-8 score improved clinically (≥3-point reduction) among 82.2% of subjects (88/107). A majority of subjects (57.0%) became asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 11 points) after 2 weeks of bilateral wear.ConclusionRefitting symptomatic contact lens patients to ACUVUE OASYS® 1-Day with HydraLuxe? can improve overall comfort and reduce symptoms of dryness and discomfort, irrespective of the previous lens modality or habitual lens material.     

Factors in the success of new contact lens wearers

Purpose

To determine the first-year retention rate for patients fitted with contact lenses (CLs) and identify factors associated with retention and dropout.

The association of comfort and vision in soft toric contact lens wear

PurposeThis work set out to investigate if there was an association between subjective comfort and both subjective and measured vision during the use of contemporary daily disposable soft toric contact lenses.MethodsThirty-eight habitual soft contact lens wearers wore each of three daily disposable toric lenses for one week in a prospective, crossover, randomised, single-masked study. The following clinical measures were recorded at dispensing and follow-up visits: biomicroscopy scores, lens fitting (including rotation and rotational stability), high and low contrast visual acuity, subjective vision quality and subjective ocular surface comfort. Subjective scores were collected using 0–10 numerical grading scales. Comfort scores were analysed using a linear regression model with age, sex, visit, phase of crossover (‘phase’), lens type, lens rotation, lens rotational stability, visual acuity, cylinder power and subjective vision quality as factors of interest and then refined using backward stepwise regression.ResultsThirty six participants (31.1 ± 13.5 years) completed the study. Comfort scores were found to be associated with subjective vision quality (F = 127.0 ; p < 0.0001), phase (F = 7.2; p = 0.001) and lens type (F = 4.9; p = 0.009). Greater comfort scores were observed with greater subjective vision quality scores. Visual acuity was not statistically significant in the model.ConclusionThis work suggests that symptoms of ocular discomfort may be more intense if there is also perceived visual compromise in daily disposable soft toric lenses. There was a stronger positive correlation between comfort and subjective vision quality compared with comfort and measured visual acuity.