Reexamining finality: How to revise institutional practice rules to allow for reconsideration of reasoned arbitration awards

It is time to allow arbitrators to correct their mistakes, according to Tucson, Ariz.‐based James M. Gaitis. In the first of two parts, he writes why he believes ADR providers should rewrite their rules to allow tribunals to reconsider reasoned awards under limited circumstances.     

The view from abroad on a parade of choices: Alternative processes to the ‘traditional’ alternative,arbitration

Mauro Rubino‐Sammartano , of Milan, Italy, discusses European alternatives to arbitration that have proven effective in resolving commercial disputes in a variety of forums.