Extension of the conditions for application of the simplified calculation methods according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA for the design of unreinforced masonry walls

Dedicated to University Prof. Dr.‐Ing. Carl‐Alexander Graubner for his 60th birthday The simplified calculation methods for unreinforced masonry structures given in DIN EN 1996‐3/NA are an easily applicable design standard for an efficient and fast verification of the resistance of mainly vertically loaded masonry walls. However, the design rules are not based on mechanical models. Instead, they are empirical approaches for a simplified estimation of the load bearing capacity. For this reason, the range of application of DIN EN 1996‐3/NA is limited by several conditions to ensure a sufficient safety of this design procedure. With regard to extending the conditions for application, extensive comparative calculations were carried out. Thereby, considering clearly defined boundary conditions, the load bearing capacity according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA was compared to that according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA. It was the aim of this comparison to identify load bearing reserves of the simplified calculation methods to point out potential for an extension regarding the maximum permissible clear wall height and the slab span. As a result, it can be stated, that an increase of the maximum wall height up to 6.0 m and the maximum slab span of 7.0 m is possible in certain cases.     

Tragfähigkeitstafeln für unbewehrtes Mauerwerk nach DIN EN 1996‐3/NA:2019‐12

Load‐bearing capacity tables for unreinforced masonry according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA:2019‐12 Practical design aids are important tools in the day‐to‐day business of structural design. The design of primarily vertically loaded masonry walls in usual building construction can be carried out with the help of so‐called load‐bearing capacity tables. A table value is read off exclusively as a function of the geometric conditions, which – multiplied by the masonry compressive strength – results in the load‐bearing capacity of the wall for cold design and in case of fire. By comparing the acting and resisting force, the verification of structural design can be provided in a simple and yet economical form. The bearing capacity tables based on the simplified calculation methods according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA:2019‐12 [1], [2] and DIN EN 1996‐1‐2/NA:2013‐06 [3], [4] are presented in this paper. Compared to the previous edition of Part 3 of Eurocode 6, the extended scope of application is taken into account, as well as the normative changes to the construction method with partially supported slabs.     

Proposal for the simplified design of basement walls under lateral earth pressure

This paper deals with the design of basement walls subjected to lateral earth pressure. The current simplified calculation method according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA only covers active earth pressure, which is the lower limiting value of the earth pressure. Designing according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA, higher coefficients of earth pressure (like earth pressure at rest) can be considered, with an additional verification of the shear resistance being necessary. This paper presents a theoretical model, which forms the basis for an analytical derivation of the loadbearing capacity, and explains the required minimum values of the acting normal force to ensure sufficient resistance to cover bending and shear. Based on these results, a simplified equation is proposed for the determination of the required minimum normal force, based on the design according to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA and providing identical values in case of an earth pressure coefficient of 1/3. The required minimum load resulting from this approach fulfils the described requirement to cover bending and shear. The presented solution is verified and the conditions for application are defined. Finally, the minimum required normal forces are evaluated and tabulated for common cases relevant to building practice.     

Design tables for the utilisation factor α6,fi for the structural fire design of masonry according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐2/NA in the simplified calculation method

Easy‐to‐use verification equations are available for the verifications in the simplified calculation method. This applies also for the structural fire design of those masonry types for which a verification with the utilisation factor α_fi is given in the National Annex DIN EN 1996‐1‐2/NA. In specific applications, however, a classification can only be made applying the utilisation factor α_6,fi. In these cases, the verification for the structural fire design by calculation is considerably more complex than the mathematical verification of the structural design in the ”cold state“. The present paper shows how the design equation for α_6,fi can be made significantly easier with regard to its application by reference to the design value of the vertical load bearing resistance in the simplified method. Moreover, an upper limit value for the utilisation factor α_6,fi for the simplified method is summarised in tables.     

Development of a tool for the structural design of the vertical load‐bearing capacity of unreinforced masonry

Before the introduction of EC 6, simple codes permitted masonry to be designed manually. The simplified procedure according to EN 1996‐3 still allows manual design, but its application is restricted. Therefore, a more laborious design according to EN 1996‐1‐1 is often required. This article presents a newly developed software tool, which facilitates the structural design of the vertical load‐bearing capacity of unreinforced masonry according to EN 1996‐1‐1. The tool is intuitive to use and has been developed based on experience from working in the field. The tool assists the planner in making decisions during the masonry design process. This article describes and explains the implemented, theoretical assumptions as well as the software tool N_Rd‐Pro‐Tool itself. This software tool facilitates simple, clear und transparent structural design of the vertical load bearing capacity of unreinforced masonry.     

Veneer walls of masonry as specified in EC 6 (DIN EN 1996‐2/NA) / Zweischaliges Mauerwerk nach EC 6 (DIN EN 1996‐2/NA)

This article deals with the production of veneer walls as specified in DIN EN 1996‐2/NA [3]. Against this background of the extensive revision of the section for veneer walls an exposition in accordance with the previous requirements as specified in DIN 1053‐1 can hardly be recommended. The necessity for a basic revision of the section for veneer wall construction has already been discussed in detail and justified in several technical articles published in previous years, see [4] to [7]. With many changes and corrections in the section for veneer walls in the National Annex of DIN EN 1996‐2 [8] it is certainly not a question of new rules for this method of building, but an adjustment of the requirements in the previous standard on the basis of the practical experience gained over several years. The new requirements for the execution of cavity facing masonry enable a simple and economic implementation of this external wall construction.     

Reinforced masonry beams under shear load – Proposals for future designs / Bewehrte schubbeanspruchte Mauerwerksbalken – Vorschläge für zukünftige Bemessungen

This article is written against the backdrop of the work of the European standardisation committees on the amendment of EN 1996‐1‐1 [N 4] which will also exert an influence on the design of reinforced masonry in Germany. This paper focusses on the design approaches of DIN EN 1996‐1‐1 for untensioned reinforced masonry beams under shear load in the ultimate limit state (ULS). Proposals are made to discuss their revision. The contents of E DIN 1053‐3 [N 3] and of the final draft of the guideline ”Flat Lintels” [7] are taken into account.     

Extended conditions of application of DIN EN 1996‐3/NA for high walls

According to Eurocode 6, unreinforced masonry walls can be designed using different verification methods, whereby the simplified calculation methods are contained in Part 3 of DIN EN 1996 [1]. If the associated application limits and boundary conditions are fulfilled, a large part of the usual problems occurring in masonry construction can be dealt with without great effort. A limiting condition for the application of the simplified calculation methods is a maximum clear wall height of h = 2.75 m or h = 12 ? t. Changes in user requirements for modern buildings with masonry walls nowadays often require greater wall heights, wherefore a verification according to the general rules from DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA [2] is necessary. This means a considerably higher effort for the structural engineer. A considerable amount of calculations was done to verify whether the results of the simplified calculation methods are also valid for greater wall heights. The results were transferred into a consistent standardization proposal with regard to extended application limits of DIN EN 1996‐3/NA, which is contained in a new draft Amendment A3 for the National Application Document for Germany.     

Determination of partial resistance factors for unreinforced masonry shear walls

Partial safety factors for resistance applied in the design equation of semi‐probabilistic formats can be obtained from the evaluation of a test database. These partial safety factors are influenced by two factors, the material uncertainty and the model uncertainty. This topic is covered in a former publication [1]. It includes the determination of a partial factor for the model uncertainty of unreinforced masonry shear walls. In this study the authors examine the next step, and calculate the partial factor of resistance applying the same method, as recommended i n EN 1990 – Annex D. In addition to the Coefficient of Variation (COV) for the model uncertainty, the calculation of the resistance partial factor considers deviations in geometry, as well as loading and material properties. The influence of the material uncertainty on structural performance is considered in the calculation by means of a weighted average of all COV values for various types of material properties, based on the number of relevant failure modes in the test database. In the last step, the resistance partial factors for models defined in DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA and DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA – Annex K are calculated by applying the probabilistic methods recommended in EN 1990 – Annex D and the model bias.     

The simplified calculation method of DIN EN 1996‐3 in practice / Das vereinfachte Bemessungsverfahren von DIN EN 1996‐3 in der Praxis

The design and detailing of masonry buildings was usually undertaken in the past using the simplified procedure in Section 6 of DIN 1053‐1 (1996‐11). With the changeover to the new European code, a new procedure has been made available with the simplified calculation method of DIN EN 1996‐3, which promises similarly simple and safe handling for the user. The practical implementation of this new code has been underway for some time. The article investigates the standard design cases and explains the innovations and alterations compared to DIN 1053‐1.     

Minimum surcharge load of URM walls under flexure and axial force / Mindestauflast bei Biegung mit Normalkraft

This paper suggests a detailed parametric study, which has been drawn up in connection with the question of the necessity of verification of masonry wall by a minimum vertical load subject to bending and normal force by the author and his team [7]. It assumes the actual eccentricities from supporting due floors and takes into account the second order theory in middle of wall according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1 or the German NA. In some cases, the model is derived for very high wind loads to its limits. Using the arch model which is introduced in DIN EN 1996‐1‐1 and may be applied by NA, is helpful and effective. This method may provide higher capacity rather than for example, with the bar or plate model. In this article the verification by means of the arch model will be presented and discussed. It is also shown that, forming an arch opposing to the horizontal wind load and low vertical loads may not come to a stability failure.     

Design aids for unreinforced masonry under bending compression – Part 2: Application of design aids for structural design according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA

The semi‐probabilistic safety concept of divided safety factors for action and resistance of DIN EN 1990 [1] in combination with the structural design codes DIN EN 1996‐1‐1 [2] and DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA [3] include the requirement that acting normal forces N_Ed may not exceed the normal force resistances N_Rd for the structural design of masonry under bending compression. According to [3], fully plastic material behaviour can be assumed and the stress block used as the material law for masonry. Building on this, design aids and their theoretical basis were presented in Part 1 of this scientific paper [4], which are comparable with the ω tables (called the ? table here) and the general design diagram for massive construction. The application of the design aids is described in this second part of this scientific paper through calculation examples and the connection with the calculation approaches of [3] is made clear. The relation to the reduction factor ?_m, which covers effects of 2^nd order theory, is also obtained. With known values of the load eccentricities according to 1^st and 2^nd order theory, the design task becomes the analysis of the loadbearing capacity of the masonry section at half wall height. Knowing ?_m, the load eccentricity e₂ and the additional moment according to 2^nd order theory can subsequently be determined, which does not ensue from the calculation equations of [3]. With the general design diagram, the values of compression zone height and the assumed load eccentricities of the acting normal forces, which result from the reset rule for masonry sections with high load eccentricities, can be directly read off, greatly improving the clarity of this procedure.     

Current developments in fire protection – Changeover to design and classification according to the Eurocode / Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Brandschutz – Umstellung auf die Bemessung und Klassifizierung nach europäischen Normen

The European requirements for fire safety design and testing of structural masonry members are already the governing requirements in many cases. In principle, both the European and the German classification may be used according to the Bauregelliste. However, the latter may only be used when European classification of a member or construction material is not possible because the appropriate European standards do not exist. The European standards do not differ fundamentally from the German standard DIN 4102‐2. One significant difference is that according to the DIN 4102‐2, it was required to carry out two tests with the most unfavourable result governing, while according to the European standard, only one test is required. According to the EN Standard, the tests for fire resistance and the reaction to fire are carried out separately. There are other differences related to the pressure in the furnace as well as the use of plate thermocouples instead of jacketed thermocouples. Fire safety design of masonry is carried out in accordance with EC 6‐1‐2 and the National Annex. Only the members not regulated in the EC 6‐1‐2, e.g. pre‐cast masonry members, non‐load‐bearing walls, lintels, connections and joints, should be designed and checked according to the revised DIN 4102‐4.     

Spannungs‐Dehnungs‐Linien von Porenbeton bei hohen Temperaturen: ein erster Schritt zur versuchsbasierten Bemessung gemäß EN 1996‐1‐2

Stress‐strain curves of AAC at high temperatures: a first step toward the performance‐based design according to EN 1996‐1‐2 In this paper, the performance‐based approach for the design of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry walls subjected to fire is presented. The problems associated with the calculation methods in the current version of EN 1996‐1‐2 for the assessment of AAC loadbearing walls are explained. The current version of EN 1996‐1‐2 offers only tabulated data as a reliable method for structural fire assessment. The content of current Annex C and D is generally considered as not being reliable for design because of the absence of an adequate validation by experimental tests. For this reason, a proposal is made for the improvement of the input parameters for mechanical models based on experimental tests on AAC masonry. On this basis, new stress‐strain curves as a function of temperature are proposed here and then compared with the stress‐strain curves currently included in the Annex D of EN 1996‐1‐2. The comparison results point out that the current curves do not correspond to the effective behaviour of AAC masonry under fire conditions. The proposed curves can be used as base to be implemented in the new version of EN 1996‐1‐2.     

Flexural tensile tests with vertically perforated clay unit masonry with thin layer mortar / Biegezugversuche an Planziegelmauerwerk

As part of the EU project, INSYSME – INnovative SYStems for earthquake resistant Masonry Enclosures in reinforced concrete buildings – to optimise infill masonry the German project partners carried out an initial part of the project on flexural strength testing of high‐tech clay block masonry in accordance with DIN EN 1052‐2. In this a wide range of modern products was considered which at present is regulated in Germany by means of general building authority approvals. The test results show that the specifications for flexural tensile strength of high‐tech clay block masonry in DIN EN 1996 are very conservative in most cases.     

Simplified verification method for unreinforced masonry shear walls

According to the German National Annex to DIN EN 1996‐3, a calculative verification of the bracing system may be omitted if, besides other requirements, an obviously sufficient number of sufficiently long shear walls is in place. If it is questionable whether a building complies with this requirement, a time‐consuming verification of the bracing system according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA is unavoidable. This article therefore presents a simplified verification method for the bracing system, which will prospectively be included in the next revision of DIN EN 1996‐3. The simplified bracing verification can already be used as a decision‐making aid to omit the calculative bracing verification according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA.     

Shear tests on highly thermal insulating clay unit masonry walls with thin layer mortar

The paper presents the results of a series of 6 shear tests on full scale highly thermal insulating clay unit masonry walls. The walls consisted of units with large voids filled with mineral wool with a thermal conductivity of λ = 0,07 W/(m · K). The aim of the investigations was the verification of the in‐plane‐shear resistance of this type of thermal insulating clay unit masonry in addition to the tests reported in [1]. The current design rules for clay unit masonry in DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA are rather conservative compared to the test results for thermal insulating units.     

Characterization of uncertainty (probabilistic models) in verification of unreinforced masonry shear wall / Charakterisierung der Unschärfe (probabilistische Modelle) beim Nachweis von Wandscheiben aus unbewehrtem Mauerwerk

The model uncertainty has significant role in determination of safety factor. Eurocode has been considered partial factor covering uncertainties in the resistance model. Moreover, the model uncertainty has important role in full probabilistic verification. A stochastic analysis may yield to realistic results, only if the uncertainties have been involved in the calculation, properly. The uncertainty in predicted load‐carrying model may be identified by comparing the observed (experimental records) load‐carrying behaviour with the predicted value. Some general recommendations for considering uncertainty in probabilistic verifications are available in literature. In this study, the deviation of predicted values according to DIN EN 1996‐1‐1/NA model of masonry shear wall from test results has been derived. The best‐fitted distribution with associated statistical parameters (type of distribution, mean and coefficient of variation) has been proposed for uncertainty model. The uncertainty models have been compared with recommendations in the literature.     

Out‐of‐plane bending moments in masonry walls – Analysis of different calculation methods

In the course of the revision of EN 1996‐1‐1, a new proposal has been made for the calculation of internal forces in frame‐type structures for the determination of bending moments due to slab rotation. In addition to a stiffness reduction for masonry walls in conjunction with the special features of partially supported slabs, which is already usual in Germany, the calculated ever‐present minimum loadbearing capacity of a wall is also increased due to a reduction of the maximum applied load eccentricity. Another major change is the direct implementation of wind loads in the method to determine the internal forces. To ensure that these changes do not lead to a safety deficit or an uneconomic reduction of the loadbearing capacity compared with the current situation, the results of extensive comparative calculations are presented. In addition, it is examined whether the proposal could conflict with further investigations to extend the conditions for application of the simplified design procedures according to EN 1996‐3. It is shown that the new draft provides similar results to the current method and that there are no concerns about its application. Also, the investigations to extend the conditions for application of the simplified calculation methods can be based on the new proposal without concerns.     

Minimum vertical load on masonry walls – a realistic view / Mindestauflast auf Mauerwerkswänden – eine realitätsnahe Betrachtung

To transfer bending moments in building components consisting of a material without tensile strength always requires a simultaneously acting normal force. Accordingly, masonry walls exposed to horizontal loads (e.g. wind) require a minimum vertical load, so that the resultant stress at the mid‐height of the wall remains the same within the cross‐section. As part of the A2 amendment to DIN EN 1996‐3/NA, this verification of walls subjected to low vertical loads, such as outer walls on the top floor exposed to high wind load was implemented in the National Annex. Part 3 of DIN EN 1996‐3 includes a similar standard regulation for verification of the minimum vertical load, which is based on an arch effect within the wall cross‐section. Based on this technical background and taking into account the main influencing parameters, a verification model is presented here which realistically describes the load‐bearing behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls subjected primarily to bending. Apart from the bending moments due to wind load, an initial eccentricity of the wall as well as second order effects due to wall deformations also have to be taken into account. In addition, a simple approximation equation is provided for the practical determination of the required minimum vertical load.