Tensile properties of polyethylene blends

Binary and ternary blends were prepared from low, medium, and high density polyethylene. The tensile properties of these materials indicated that the blends formed either compatible or semi-compatible mixtures. One of the ternary blends exhibited a slight synergism in properties which could be partially attributed to an enhancement in crystallinity. Such blends may have practical utility by yielding materials having a combination of strength, stiffness, and toughness.     

Dynamic mechanical properties and morphology of polypropylene/maleated polypropylene blends

The dynamic mechanical properties of both homopolypropylene (PPVC)/Maleated Poly-propylene (PP-g-MA) and ethylene-propylene block copolymer (PPSC)/Maleated Poly-propylene (PP-g-MA) blends have been studied by using a dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer (PL-DMTA MKII) over a wide temperature range, covering a frequency zone from 0.3 to 30 Hz. With increasing content of PP-g-MA, α relaxation of both blends gradually shift to a lower temperature and the apparent activation energy ΔE_α increases. In PPVC/PP-g-MA blends, β relaxation shifts to a higher temperature as the content of PP-g-MA increases from 0 to 20 wt % and then change unobviously for further varying content of PP-g-MA from 20 to 35 wt %. On the contrary, in the PPSC/PP-g-MA blends β₁ relaxation, the apparent activation energy ΔE_β1 and β₂ relaxation are almost unchanged with blend composition, while ΔE_β2 increases with an increase of PP-g-MA content. In the composition range studied, storage modulus É value for PPSC/PP-g-MA blends decreases progressively between β₂ and α relaxation with increasing temperature, but in the region the increment for PPVC/PP-g-MA blends is independent of temperature. The flexural properties of PPVC/PP-g-MA blend show more obvious improvement on PP than one of PPSC/PP-g-MA blends. Scanning electron micrographs of fracture surfaces of the blends clearly demonstrate two-phase morphology, viz. the discrete particles homogeneously disperse in the continous phase, the main difference in the morphology between both blends is that the interaction between the particles and the continuous phase is stronger for for PPVC/PP-g-MA than for PPSC/PP-g-MA blend. By the correlation of the morphology with dynamic and mechanical properties of the blends, the variation of the relaxation behavior and mechanical properties with the componenet structure, blend composition, vibration frequency, and as well as the features observed in these variation are reasonably interpreted. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Tensile properties in the oriented blends of high-density polyethylene and isotactic polypropylene obtained by dynamic packing injection molding

In this article, tensile properties have been discussed in terms of phase morphology, crystallinity and molecular orientation in the HDPE/iPP blends, prepared via dynamic packing injection molding, with aid of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) as well as two dimensional X-ray scattering (2D WAXS). For the un-oriented blends, the tensile properties (tensile strength and modulus) are mainly dominated by the phase morphology and interfacial adhesion related to the influenced crystallization between HDPE and iPP component. A maximum in tensile strength and modulus is found at iPP content in the range of 70-80 v/v%. As for the oriented blends, however, the presence of dispersed phase in the blends, independent of phase morphology and crystallinity, always makes tensile properties to be deteriorated through reducing molecular orientation of matrix. It is molecular orientation of matrix that determines the tensile properties of oriented blends. In the blends with HDPE as matrix, steep decreasing of tensile properties is related to the rapid reducing of molecular orientation of HDPE, whereas in the blends with iPP as a major component, slight decreasing of molecular orientation of iPP results in slight reducing of tensile properties. Other factors, such as interfacial properties and phase morphology, seem to be little contribution to the modulus and tensile strength.     

The structure and properties of drawn blends of polyethylene and polypropylene

A series of highly oriented tapes has been prepared from a blend consisting of equal proportions of polyethylene and polypropylene. The mechanical properties and the structure and morphology of the samples have been investigated using DSC, optical microscopy, and wide angle and small angle diffraction, including measurements of crystal strain on samples under stress. It has been confirmed that the blend is incompatible, and a structural model has been proposed which is consistent with the observation that the polyethylene and polypropylene components act essentially independently in their response to external macroscopic stress.     

Extrusion of polyethylene/polypropylene blends with microfibrillar‐phase morphology

Extrusion of immiscible polymers under special conditions can lead to creation of microfibrillar‐phase morphology, ensuring significant increase of mechanical properties of polymer profiles. Polyethylene/polypropylene blend extrudates with microfibrillar‐phase morphology (polypropylene microfibrils reinforcing polyethylene matrix phase) were prepared through continuous extrusion with semihyperbolic‐converging die enabling elongation and orientation of microfibrils in flow direction. Structure of extruded profiles was examined using electron microscopy and wide‐angle X‐ray scattering. Tensile tests proved that extrudates with microfibrillar‐phase morphology show significantly higher mechanical properties than the conventional extrudates. The presented concept offers possibility of replacing the existing expensive multi‐component medical devices with fully polymeric tools. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:1427–1433, 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Dynamic mechanical properties and morphology of polypropylene block copolymers and polypropylene/elastomer blends

The relation between the dynamic mechanical properties and the morphology of polypropylene (PP) block copolymers and polypropylene/elastomer blends was studied by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), light- and electron microscopy. The latter techniques contributed to an improvement in assignments of relaxation transitions in the DMA spectra. It was established that PP block copolymers had multiphase structure since the ethylene/propylene rubber phase (EPR) formed in the copolymerization contained polyethylene (PE) domains. An identical morphology was found in the case of PP/polyolefin thermoplastic rubber (TPO) blends. Impact modification of PP by styrene/butadiene block copolymers led to a multiphase structure, too, due to the polystyrene (PS) domains aggregated in the soft rubbery polybutadiene phase. In the semicrystalline polyolefinic and in the amorphous styrene/butadienebased thermoplastic rubbers, PE crystallites and PS do mains acted as nodes of the physical network structure, respectively. PP/EPDM/TPO ternary blends developed for replacing high-density PE showed very high dispersion of the modifiers as compared to that of PP block copolymers. This fine dispersion of the impact modifier is a basic regulating factor of impact energy dissipation in the form of shear yielding and crazing.     

Adhesion of polyethylene blends to polypropylene

The effect of chain microstructure on adhesion of ethylene copolymers to polypropylene (PP) was studied using coextruded microlayers. Adhesion was measured by delamination toughness G using the T-peel test, and interfacial morphology was examined by atomic force microscopy. Good adhesion to PP was achieved with homogeneous metallocene catalyzed copolymers (mPE) with density 0.90 g cm⁻³ or less. Good adhesion was attributed to entanglement bridges. In contrast, a heterogeneous Ziegler-Natta catalyzed copolymer (ZNPE) of density 0.925 g cm⁻³ exhibited poor adhesion to PP due to an amorphous interfacial layer of low molecular weight, highly branched fractions that prevented effective interaction of ZNPE bulk chains with PP. Blending mPE with ZNPE eliminated the amorphous interfacial layer and resulted in epitaxial crystallization of ZNPE bulk chains with some increase in G. Increasing the mPE content of the blend past the amount required to completely resolve the amorphous interfacial layer of ZNPE resulted in a steady, almost linear, increase in G. Phase separation of mPE and ZNPE during crystallization produced an interface with regions of epitaxially crystallized ZNPE bulk chains and other regions of entangled mPE chains. Entanglement bridges imparted much better adhesion than did epitaxially crystallized lamellae.     

Thermomechanical properties and morphology of polyethylene oxide and phenolic resole blends

Blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and resole type phenolic resin were prepared by a solution cast method using water as a solvent. The cured blends were made by heat curing without using any catalyst. The blends were characterized by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), which indicated that PEO forms compatible blend with the resole. The glass transition values, read from the DMA traces, showed a positive shift as compared to the theoretical values calculated by the Fox equation. This suggests a strong H‐bonding interaction between the phenolic resole and PEO as established by Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Flexural test indicated an enhanced flexibility of the blends when compared to the neat phenolic resin. The fracture surface analysis by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed an increase in plastic deformation with increasing PEO concentration in the blend. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Ultralow density polyethylene blends with polypropylene

Two types of ultralow density polyethylene (ULDPE) of different melt viscosities were blended with a polypropylene (PP) in a twin screw extruder. Morphology, thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of the blends were determined. Morphological observation from SEM showed a clean phase separation of PP/ULDPE blends. However, depending on the viscosity ratio, a significant difference in the extent of phase separation, as well as in the phase inversion composition, was demonstrated. The melting temperature of PP and ULDPE were respectively increased and decreased in the blend. Crystallization rate and the, crystallinity of PP and ULDPE were first increased and then decreased as the other component was increased. Yield at low frequencies was observed with 30 wt% ULDPE in PP. In ULDPE-rich compositions, complex viscosities of the blends gave negative deviation from the additive rule of mixing. Mechanical properties such as flexural modulus, elongation at break and Vicat softening point were closely relatable to the morphology. The impact strength of PP is significantly improved by ULDPE addition.     

Nonisothermal crystallization,melting behavior,and morphology of polypropylene/linear bimodal polyethylene blends

The nonisothermal crystallization, melting behavior, and morphology of isotactic polypropylene (PP)/linear bimodal polyethylene (LBPE) blends were studied with differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and polarized optical microscopy. The results showed that PP and LBPE were miscible to a certain extent, and there was no obvious phase separation in the blends. The modified Avrami analysis, Ozawa equation, and Mo method were used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends. The values of the Avrami exponent indicated that the crystallization nucleation of the blends was homogeneous, the growth of spherulites was three‐dimensional, and the crystallization mechanism of PP was not affected much by LBPE. The crystallization activation energy was estimated by the Kissinger method. The results obtained with the modified Avrami analysis, Mo method, and Kissinger method agreed well. The addition of a minor LBPE phase favored an increase in the overall crystallization rate of PP, showing some dilution effect of LBPE on PP. The PP spherulites decreased obviously with increasing content of LBPE. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Phase separation in polypropylene and metallocene polyethylene blends

Blends of a metallocene linear low density polyethylene (m‐LLDPE) and polypropylene random copolymer (PP) have been prepared using a twin screw extruder and characterized by thermal analysis, mechanical properties, and wide angle X‐ray scattering to determine their degree of compatibility. The blends were either directly quenched in water from the melt‐ or slow‐cooled to room temperature. In both cases, the two components formed separate phases and crystallized independently. The slow‐cooled specimens had higher yield stress, tensile modulus, and lower elongation at break consistent with higher degree of crystallinity. The elongation to break also varied with composition reaching a minimum at 50% consistent with the incompatible nature of the blends. Crystallization kinetics and melting studies confirm that the two components formed separate phases and crystallized independently. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46:889–895, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Tensile properties and interfacial adhesion of silicone rubber/polyethylene blends by reactive blending

Two‐phase blends of silicone rubber (SR) and linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) were prepared by reactive blending using peroxide crosslinking agent of SR. The tensile strength and elastic modulus of the SR were found to be increased by reactive blending with LLDPE without sacrifice of the elongation. The improvement of the tensile properties is attributed to the strong adhesion at the interface between SR matrix and LLDPE domain due to the chemical reaction by peroxide. The observation by polarized optical microscopies revealed that the debonding did not occur at the interface, but the LLDPE domains were elongated to longer one. Despite the elongation of the LLDPE domain, the blends exhibited good deformation recoverability. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46192.     

Tensile properties of polyarylate-polycarbonate blends

Blends of polyarylate (PA)-a copolyester of bisphenol A with a mixture of terephthalic/isophthalic acids at 50/50 proportion–and polycarbonate of bisphenol A (PC) were melt mixed into films with a Brabender Plasticorder. The processing produced transreacted mixtures that exhibited a modulus and yield stress with a maximum that is above the linear (very similar to that observed for compatible polymer blends). The elongation at yield did not show any maximum but it is also above linearity.     

Miscibility and crystallization of metallocene polyethylene blends with polypropylene

The crystallization and morphology of very‐low‐density polyethylene (VLDPE) and ultra‐low‐density polyethylene (ULDPE) blends with isotactic polypropylene (PP) were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and hot‐stage optical microscopy (HSOM) with polarized light. In particular, the isothermal crystallization of PP in molten PE was investigated. A polypropylene homopolymer was melt‐blended with six types of VLDPEs and ULDPEs, with variations in branch content and length and in molecular weight. All the blends contained 20% PP by mass. It was found that the crystallization temperatures of PP and PE changed in the blends, and the crystallization of PP was affected by branch length and content and by the molecular weight of the PE, indicating a certain degree of miscibility between PP and PE. The isothermal crystallization rate of PP decreased in the blends; in particular, the crystallization rate of PP was slower in the ULDPE with lower MFI, suggesting that crystallization of PP was hindered by PE and that its rate was regulated by the viscosity of ULDPE. HSOM images showed that a portion of the PP crystallized from molten PE, although phase separation was obvious, providing additional information on the miscible behavior between PP and VLDPEs (or ULDPEs). Furthermore, the miscible level between the PP and the ULDPEs was higher than that between the PP and the VLDPEs because the degree of change in the crystallization behavior of the PP and PE was greater in the PP–ULDPE blends. This was possibly a result of the higher branch content in the ULDPE. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 1179–1189, 2003     

The reactive extrusion of polyethylene/polypropylene blends

The objective of this work was to investigate the compatibilization of a blend of linear low density polyethylene with polypropylene by Injection of a free radical initiator during extrusion. The reactive extrusion process utilized a single screw extruder equipped with two static mixers. The initiator was injected into the extruder feedport and temperature programming used to cause most reaction to occur within the static mixers. Although elongation at yield was increased by 37 percent, impact strength and yield strength decreased by 17 and 54 percent, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the maximum size of the dispersed phase decreased from a maximum size of four microns to less than two microns upon addition of initiator. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC), temperature rising elution chromatography (TREF), and differential scanning calorimetry showed that the polypropylene in the blend was degrading while the polyethylene was increasing in molecular size. The combination of SEC and TREF was particularly useful in elucidating this result. No copolymer was discerned by any of the methods used.     

Reactive compatibilization of polypropylene/polyethylene terephthalate blends

The reactive compatibilization of polypropylene/polyethylene terephthalate (PP/PET) blends by addition of glycidyl methacrylate grafted PP (PP-g-GMA) was studied. Two PP-g-GMA copolymers, containing either 0.2 or 1.2 wt% of GMA, were used as interface modifiers. These were incorporated into PP blends (with either 70 or 90 wt% PET), replacing 1/5 of PP in the system. The use of these modifiers changed the blends' tensile mechanical behavior from fragile to ductile. Blend tensile strength was improved by 10% and elongation at break showed 10 to 20-fold increases while stiffness remained constant. Scanning electron micrographs showed the PP average domain size in injection molded specimens to decrease to the micron/sub-micron size upon addition of the GMA modified resins, while the unmodified blends exhibited heterogeneous morphology comprising large lamellae 10–20 μm wide. The low-GMA graft content PP seemed slightly more efficient than the high GMA content PP in emulsifiying PP/PET blends. The GMA grafting level on PP had very limited effects on the blends' mechanical behavior in the range of GMA graft density provided by the two modified resins investigated.     

热塑性聚氨酯/氯化聚乙烯共混物形态与性能的影响因素

采用机械共混法制备了热塑性聚氯酯(TPU)/氯化聚乙烯(CPE)共混物,考察了共混比(质量比,下同)对共混物加工性能、力学性能及微观形态的影响.研究了热稳定剂种类对共混物力学性能、热稳定性的影响.结果表明.加入CPE可以明显改善TPU的加工性能;在TPU与CPE的共混比分别为70/30和60/40时,TPU/CPE共混物具有较好的力学性能;TPU与CPE共混,二者的相容性较好,热稳定性均得到提高;自制环保型钙锌复合稳定剂的综合稳定作用较好,且所得共混物的力学性能也好.     

Tensile properties,morphology, and biodegradability of blends of starch with various thermoplastics

In the present study, blends of starch with different thermoplastics were prepared by a melt blending technique. The tensile properties and morphology of the blends were measured. It was found that with increasing starch content in starch/ionomer blends, the tensile strength and modulus increase. But for starch/low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and starch/aliphatic polyester (APES) blends, tensile strength and modulus decrease with increasing the starch loading. Elongation at break values of all the blend systems decrease with increasing starch loading. The scanning electron micrographs (SEM) support the findings of tensile properties. Better homogeneity is observed in starch/ionomer systems compared with that in starch/APES and starch/LDPE systems. Up to 50% starch content, the starch/ionomer blends appear as a single phase. The extent of phase interactions of starch/APES system lies in between the starch/LDPE and starch/ionomer systems. From the biodegradability studies of the blends it was found that, although the pure LDPE and ionomer are not biodegradable, the starch/LDPE and starch/ionomer blends are biodegradable with an appreciable rate. The rate of biodegradation of the starch/APES is very high as both the components are biodegradable. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2907–2915, 2002     

Nonisothermal crystallization,melting behavior,and morphology of polypropylene/metallocene‐catalyzed polyethylene blends

The nonisothermal crystallization, melting behavior, and morphology of blends of polypropylene (PP) and a metallocene‐catalyzed polyethylene (mPE) elastomer were studied with differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, polarized optical microscopy, and X‐ray diffraction. The results showed that PP and mPE were partially miscible and could form some cocrystallization, although the extent was very small. A modified Avrami analysis and the Mo method were used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends. The values of the Avrami exponent indicated that the crystallization nucleation of the blends was homogeneous, the growth of the spherulites was three‐dimensional, and the crystallization mechanism of PP was not affected by mPE. The crystallization activation energy was estimated with the Kissinger method. Interesting results were obtained with the modified Avrami analysis and Mo and Kissinger methods, and the conclusions were in good agreement. The addition of less mPE increased the overall crystallization rate of PP. The relationship between the composition and morphology of the blends was examined. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1203–1210, 2004