Changes in plasma epinephrine concentration and in heart rate during head-up tilt testing in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope: correlation with successful therapy with beta-receptor antagonists

OBJECTIVE: To develop, implement and evaluate an effective and efficient heparin nomogram. DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective data collection. SETTING: Coronary care unit (CCU) of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with acute coronary ischemic syndromes requiring intravenous (i.v.) heparin who were not receiving thrombolytic and/or warfarin therapy. INTERVENTIONS: A retrospective chart review of 52 CCU patients receiving iv heparin provided the historical control group. The effectiveness of a heparin nomogram (5000 U bolus followed by an initial weight-based infusion of 15 U/kg/h with subsequent rate adjustments according to activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] results) was then prospectively assessed in a further 56 consecutive patients. MAIN RESULTS: The historical control and nomogram groups did not significantly differ with respect to age, weight, duration of therapy or total number of aPTTs drawn. Approximately 79% and 84% of patients in the control and nomogram groups, respectively, achieved an aPTT within the therapeutic range (60 to 90 s, P > 0.05), whereas 89% and 100% of control and nomogram patients, respectively, surpassed the therapeutic threshold (longer than 60 s) at some point during treatment (P = 0.009). Compared with empiric dose adjustment, the nomogram more effectively avoided periods of inadequate anticoagulation. Similarly, the time to achieve the therapeutic threshold was significantly longer in the control than in the nomogram group (8.2 +/- 5.9 versus 6.7 +/- 3.7 h, P = 0.026). No adverse bleeding events were noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional approaches, the heparin nomogram successfully achieved and maintained adequate anticoagulation in a greater proportion of patients with acute cardiovascular diseases without the need for additional aPTT measurements.     

Reevaluation of a weight-based heparin dosing nomogram: is institution-specific modification necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To compare a heparin dosing nomogram using an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h with physician-directed heparin prescribing and with a modified version of the nomogram adjusted for institution-specific data. METHODS: During consecutive phases of this cohort study, patients' intravenous heparin therapies were initiated and adjusted by using one of the following three methods: (1) physician-directed dosing, (2) a body weight-based dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h, and (3) a body weight-based dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate determined by the median dose of heparin (in units/kg/h) required to achieve therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) during the first two phases. The time required to achieve therapeutic aPTTs as well as the percentage of initial aPTTs in the therapeutic range were compared for the three phases. RESULTS: The heparin dosing nomogram in which the initial infusion rate was adjusted for our individual institution resulted in a statistically shorter median time until aPTTs were in the therapeutic range than did either the physician-directed dosing or unmodified nomogram groups (6.1 h in the modified nomogram group, 10.5 h in the physician-directed group, 21.5 h in the unmodified nomogram group; p < 0.05 for all differences). Use of the institution-specific nomogram resulted in the greatest percentage of initial aPTTs in the therapeutic range (84% in the 13 units/kg/h nomogram group vs. 47% in the physician-directed group and 18% in the 18 units/kg/h nomogram group; p < 0.05 for all differences). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a heparin dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h resulted in prolongation of the time to reach therapeutic aPTTs. By modifying the nomogram for use at an individual institution, we reduced the time to achieve therapeutic range of aPTTs while still reducing the likelihood of excessive anticoagulation of patients.     

Glucosamine

We have taken a stepwise approach to improving the dosing of continuous intravenous heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Our primary objective was to use computer modeling to develop a nomogram for managing heparin therapy and to put in place a continuous quality monitoring system to evaluate the nomogram's effectiveness. We prospectively collected data on 41 patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction who were treated with heparin. Their response to heparin was computer modeled and the dose to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio of 2.0 was established. This dose was regressed against all demographic characteristics to establish predictors of heparin dose (phase I). The regression formula was used prospectively in 110 patients to initiate the infusion rate of heparin and a bolus dose to achieve an aPTT ratio of 2.5. Subsequent dosage adjustments were achieved by computer modeling the patient's aPTT response (phase II). A nomogram was developed that simulated the decisions achieved using computer-assisted methods. This was retrospectively tested and then prospectively tested in 50 patients using nursing staff (phase IV). The nomogram was then made generally available (phase IV) and has been tested in an additional 310 patients. Phase I: Of the original 41 patients, 32% of the aPTT ratios were in the therapeutic range, 36% were supratherapeutic, and 32% were subtherapeutic after the first 24 hours. Phases II and III resulted in 85% of the aPTT ratios between 1.5 and 2.5 at 24 hours. Phase 4 had similar results in 310 patients. The use of computer-assisted or a computer-generated nomogram to adjust heparin therapy results in better control of heparin therapy than using standard methods.     

Automated heparin-delivery system to control activated partial thromboplastin time: evaluation in normal volunteers

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin is used widely; however, control of the level of anticoagulation remains its greatest problem, with fewer than 35% of patients having activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) within a range of 55 to 85 seconds in recent trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed and tested a prototype of an automated heparin control system (AutoHep) in which a computer-based titration algorithm adjusted the heparin infusion to reach a target aPTT. In 1 study, 12 healthy male subjects received an intravenous infusion of heparin with the rate determined by AutoHep and were randomized to receive an initial bolus or no bolus of heparin preceding the infusion. A second study evaluated the automated blood sampling system in 12 subjects. Of the 344 end-point aPTT measurements, 78% were within +/-10 seconds of the target (prespecified primary end point), and 89% were within a +/-15-second range. The time to achieve a target aPTT was 93 minutes without and 150 minutes with an initial heparin bolus. The total percentage of time within the target range +/-15 seconds was 46 of 48 hours (96%). The automatic blood sampling system successfully obtained 96% of all scheduled samples. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the AutoHep system has the potential to significantly improve aPTT control of intravenous heparin compared with current clinical practice.     

Activated partial thromboplastin time and outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-I trial

BACKGROUND: Although intravenous heparin is commonly used after thrombolytic therapy, few reports have addressed the relationship between the degree of anticoagulation and clinical outcomes. We examined the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in 29,656 patients in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial and analyzed the relationship between the aPTT and both baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intravenous heparin was administered as a 5000-U bolus followed by an initial infusion of 1000 U/h, with dose adjustment to achieve a target aPTT of 60 to 85 seconds. aPTTs were collected 6, 12, and 24 hours after thrombolytic administration. Higher aPTT at 24 hours was strongly related to lower patient weight (P < .00001) as well as older age, female sex, and lack of cigarette smoking (all PT< .0001). At 12 hours, the aPTT associated with the lowest 30-day mortality, stroke, and bleeding rates was 50 to 70 seconds. There was an unexpected direct relationship between the aPTT and the risk of subsequent reinfarction. There was a clustering of reinfarction in the first 10 hours after discontinuation of intravenous heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the relationship between aPTT and clinical outcome was confounded to some degree by the influence of baseline prognostic characteristics, aPTTs higher than 70 seconds were found to be associated with higher likelihood of mortality, stroke, bleeding, and reinfarction. These findings suggest that until proven otherwise, we should consider the aPTT range of 50 to 70 seconds as optimal with intravenous heparin after thrombolytic therapy.     

A method for uni-directional reconstitution of human erythrocyte glucose transporter

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient factors other than body weight would better predict patients' initial antifactor Xa heparin activity (HA) after start of unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: A 625-bed, adults-only, private, tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety-two patients requiring UFH therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received initial UFH bolus doses of 72-80 U/kg ideal weight and initial UFH infusions of 19.1-21.2 U/kg ideal weight. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the first 6-hour HA measurements were supratherapeutic (> 0.7 U/ml antifactor Xa activity). Patient weight was inferior to a combination of age and estimated plasma volume in predicting initial HA. A predictive model including these two factors accounted for 38.5% of variation in first HA levels compared with 17.7% with actual weight alone. CONCLUSION: Weight-based UFH dosing may frequently result in nontherapeutic initial HA levels. Initial UFH dosing might be improved if protocols based on patient age and estimated plasma volume were developed.     

A randomized, multicenter trial of weight-adjusted intravenous heparin dose titration and point-of-care coagulation monitoring in hospitalized patients with active thromboembolic disease. Antithrombotic Therapy Consortium Investigators

BACKGROUND: Therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin improves clinical outcome in patients with active thromboembolic disease, but achieving and maintaining a therapeutic level of anticoagulation remains a major challenge for clinicians. METHODS: A total of 113 patients requiring heparin for at least 48 hours were randomly assigned at 7 medical centers to either weight-adjusted or non-weight-adjusted dose titration. They were separately assigned to either laboratory-based or point-of-care (bedside) coagulation monitoring. RESULTS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing yielded a higher mean activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) value 6 hours after treatment initiation than non-weight-adjusted dosing (99.9 vs 78.8 seconds; P =.002) and reduced the time required to exceed a minimum threshold (aPTT >45 seconds) of anticoagulation (10.5 vs 8.6 hours; P =.002). Point-of-care coagulation monitoring significantly reduced the time from blood sample acquisition to a heparin infusion adjustment (0.4 vs 1.6 hours; P <.0001) and to reach the therapeutic aPTT range (51 to 80 seconds) (16.1 vs 19.4 hours; P =.24) compared with laboratory monitoring. Although a majority of patients participating in the study surpassed the minimum threshold of anticoagulation within the first 12 hours and reached the target aPTT within 24 hours, maintaining the aPTT within the therapeutic range was relatively uncommon (on average 30% of the overall study period) and did not differ between treatment or monitoring strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-adjusted heparin dosing according to a standardized titration nomogram combined with point-of-care coagulation monitoring using the BMC Coaguchek Plus System represents an effective and widely generalizable strategy for managing patients with thromboembolic disease that fosters the rapid achievement of a desired range of anticoagulation. Additional work is needed, however, to improve on existing patient-specific strategies that can more effectively sustain a therapeutic state of anticoagulation.     

Anticoagulant effects of hirulog, a novel thrombin inhibitor, in patients with coronary artery disease

Selective thrombin inhibitors are a new class of antithrombotic drugs that, unlike heparin, can effectively inhibit clot-bound thrombin and escape neutralization by activated platelets. Hirulog is a 20 amino acid hirudin-based synthetic peptide that has shown promise in experimental models of thrombosis. Little information is available about the effects of hirulog in patients with coronary artery disease. Forty-five patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, who were taking aspirin, were randomized to receive either (1) hirulog, 0.05 mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by 0.2 mg/kg/hour intravenous infusion until the end of the catheterization; (2) hirulog, 0.15 mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by 0.6 mg/kg/hour intravenous infusion; or (3) heparin; 5,000 U intravenous bolus. Serial activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time, activated clotting time and fibrinopeptide A were measured. Hirulog produced a dose-dependent prolongation of all coagulation parameters; the 0.6 mg/kg/hour dose prolonged the APTT to 218 +/- 50% of baseline after 2 minutes and 248 +/- 50% of baseline after 15 minutes. The half-life of the effect on APTT was 40 minutes. The hirulog blood level correlated well with the APTT, prothrombin time and activated clotting time (r = 0.77, 0.73, and 0.82 respectively, all p < 0.001). Both doses of hirulog potently suppressed the generation of fibrinopeptide A (p < 0.05). There were no major hemorrhagic, thrombotic or allergic complications in patients treated with hirulog or heparin. Thus, hirulog, a direct thrombin inhibitor, provides a predictable level of anticoagulation and appears to have a potent yet well-tolerated anticoagulant profile in patients with coronary artery disease.     

Anticoagulant therapy with recombinant hirudin in patients with thrombopenia induced by heparin

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an uncommon and severe complication of heparin therapy. Both venous and arterial thromboembolic events can occur, requiring withdrawal of the heparin therapy. When anticoagulant therapy is mandatory, recombinant hirudin can be used. METHODS: We used recombinant hirudin (HBW 023) in 6 patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia. In case of venous thromboembolism, an initial intravenous bolus (0.07 mg/kg) was followed by continuous infusion (0.05 mg/kg/h); for arterial thromboembolism the initial bolus was 0.7 mg/kg and infusion rate 0.15 mg/kg/h. When possible oral anticoagulants were started and hirudin withdrawn when the INR ratio reached 3. RESULTS: The clinical course was uneventful in all 6 patients. There was no recurrent thromboembolism. Cephalin-activated coagulation time (patient/control) varied between 1.8 and 3.5 (median 2.4) during hirudin administration. Platelet count rose to the nadir (median 70 x 10(9)/l, range 15-90) reaching over 100 x 10(9)/l in all patients between the third and sixth day (median 5 days) after stopping heparin. CONCLUSION: Intravenous administration of hirudin provides effective immediate anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, thus allowing conversion to oral anticoagulants without risking recurrent thromboembolism.     

Parents as the exclusive agents of change in the treatment of childhood obesity

The effects on alteplase-induced thrombolysis of the synthetic ATIII-binding pentasaccharide SR90107A/ORG 31540 (synthetic pentasaccharide, SP) and of standard heparin (SH) were compared in a copper coil model of coronary artery thrombosis in 6 groups of 10 dogs. After 1 h of occlusion, all animals received intravenously alteplase and aspirin, and were randomly assigned to a 2 h infusion of either saline, or one of two doses of SH (100 IU/kg bolus plus 50 IU/kg/h infusion, or 200 IU/kg bolus plus 100 IU/kg/h infusion), or one of three doses of SP (100 nmol/kg bolus plus 50 nmol/kg/h infusion, 200 nmol/kg bolus plus 100 nmol/kg/h infusion, or 400 nmol/kg bolus plus 200 nmol/kg/h infusion). Coronary angiography was performed every 10 min for 4 h. Appropriate doses of SP and SH enhanced alteplase-induced thrombolysis to a similar extent. In contrast, SP was devoid of any anti-IIa activity or aPTT prolongation.     

Phase I evaluation of mitoxantrone alone and combined with whole body hyperthermia in dogs with lymphoma

The maximum tolerated dose of mitoxantrone (MX) administered alone or combined with whole body hyperthermia (WBH) was determined in this nonrandomized, prospective study in dogs with lymphoma. MX was administered to 53 dogs every three weeks for a total of six treatments unless progressive disease or persistent, severe toxicity developed. Fifty dogs were evaluable (MX alone n = 30, MX/WBH n = 20). MX was administered as a 1 h infusion at the onset of the plateau phase of WBH in dogs treated with combined therapy. Dogs were evaluated weekly between treatments for the first four treatments with physical examination and complete blood counts to define acute and cumulative toxicity. Dogs were evaluated every three weeks for tumour response until relapse. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as that dose in each group that resulted in a 50% incidence of moderate or severe toxicity as estimated from logistic regression analysis of the toxicity data. Myelosuppression was the only toxicity observed. Neutropenia was equal in frequency and severity between treatment groups. Thrombocytopenia was not observed in any dog receiving MX/WBH but occurred in 13% of dogs treated with MX alone. The MTD for MX +/- WBH was 6.1 +/- 0.6 and 6.5 +/- 0.8mg/M2 respectively. A steeper dose response relationship was observed in dogs receiving combined therapy compared to dogs treated with MX alone suggesting WBH may improve the uniformity of patient response to chemotherapy. We concluded that MX may be administered without dose reduction to dogs undergoing WBH and that MX should be evaluated more thoroughly in future thermochemotherapy studies.     

Risks of anticoagulation therapy after experimental corticectomy in the rat

To determine the optimal postoperative interval after which heparin therapy can be safely initiated, a rat model for experimental craniotomy and corticectomy was developed. In 50 rats (100 lesions), heparin therapy was initiated 1, 2, 3, 5, or 7 days after standardized bilateral frontal corticectomy and was continued for 7 days. Intraperitoneally administered heparin, 75 to 100 U/kg.h, was continuously given to maintain the activated partial thromboplastin time in one of two ranges: therapeutic (1.5-3 times control) or supratherapeutic (> 3 times control). The size of intracranial hemorrhage was determined from coronal brain sections by automated image analysis. No significant hemorrhage was observed in control (saline infusion) animals or in rats receiving therapeutic doses of heparin beginning more than 24 hours after surgery. Small (10-50 mm3) and large (> 50 mm3) hemorrhages were frequent at all intervals up to 5 days in animals with supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (P < 0.01). Judicious heparin therapy may be safely initiated at 48 hours after craniotomy and corticectomy in rats, whereas supratherapeutic anticoagulation is associated with intracranial hemorrhage at intervals of up to 5 days.     

D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin III-complex (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (PTF). Parameters for monitoring therapy with low molecular-weight heparin in coagulation disorders

Two groups of 15 patients each with disseminated intravascular coagulation in association with septic disease were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (lmw-heparin) in different dosages (group I: 1.5-5 IE/kg body weight (BW) per hour; group II: 8-15 IE/kg BW). We studied the levels of D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 (PTF), and global tests of coagulation like prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT), thrombin time (TT) and platelet count, plasminogen activation (PA) and fibrinogen concentration to estimate the success of heparin therapy in the two groups. TT and fibrinogen concentration were not suitable to follow the course of the coagulation disorder, PT, PTT, platelet count progressively PA, D-dimer, TAT, and PTF normalised progressively after heparinisation. However, only the last three parameters were sensitive enough to show different effects of variable dosages of lmw-heparin. D-dimer, TAT, and PTF levels declined in proportion with heparin concentrations, and thus appear to be the most useful parameters for monitoring the therapeutic effect of heparin in septic coagulopathies.     

Effect of intravenous heparin infusion on thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A in unstable angina

BACKGROUND: In unstable angina, the clinical efficacy of heparin is limited in time, and recurrence of adverse events has been reported after discontinuation of the anticoagulant. METHODS: In 21 episodes of unstable angina, we used the plasma level of fibrinopeptide A (FPA) and of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) to evaluate the pattern of thrombin inhibition by heparin and the effect of stopping heparin and initiating aspirin. RESULTS: At admission, the plasma level of FPA was increased: median value 3.7 ng/mL compared with 5.5 ng/mL in a control group of 20 patients with early myocardial infarction (not significant). The following findings were observed during a 4-day course of intravenous heparin infusion: (1) FPA decreased significantly 6 hours after the start of therapy; (2) FPA was lower when activated partial thromboplastic time (aPTT) was >1.5 times baseline; (3) there was a significant negative correlation between aPTT and FPA. Twenty-four hours after heparin was discontinued and aspirin initiated, a significant increase in TAT and FPA in plasma was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm ongoing fibrin formation in the active phase of unstable angina, indicate incomplete and variable inhibition of thrombin by heparin during continuous infusion, and suggest a risk of re-emergence of thrombosis (in spite of initiating aspirin) 24 hours after withdrawal of heparin. Data demonstrate a better control of thrombin activity when heparin is infused at rates that maintain aPTT at >1.5 times baseline, as currently recommended in unstable angina.     

Physician-guided treatment compared with a heparin protocol for deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Effective heparin therapy, defined by therapeutic prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), decreases the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Achieving therapeutic prolongation of the APTT within 24 hours of the start of heparin therapy has proved difficult. We hypothesized that a protocol that delivered high initial heparin infusions to patients without identifiable risk for bleeding complications would decrease the time to achieve a therapeutic anticoagulant effect without increasing the incidence of major bleeding complications. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we studied concurrent patient cohorts. We defined a therapeutic anticoagulant effect (APTT > 55 seconds) to be an APTT more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal. Twenty patients with acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis received a 5000-U heparin bolus, followed by 1680 U/h (low risk to bleed) or 1240 U/h (high risk to bleed), adjusted by protocol-directed response to APTT results. Forty-eight patients with deep vein thrombosis were treated by their physicians. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to examine the proportion of patients who achieved an APTT greater than 55 seconds as a function of time. RESULTS: The two study cohorts did not differ with respect to age, weight, or risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the heparin protocol decreased the time to achieve a therapeutic anticoagulant effect (P = .025). Ten (91%) of 11 patients (95% confidence interval, 59% to 100%) without risks to bleed who were treated by the heparin protocol and 29 (60%) of 48 patients (95% confidence interval, 45% to 74%) not treated by the protocol had an initial therapeutic APTT (P = .006). CONCLUSION: A protocol that delivers higher initial heparin infusions to patients without identifiable risks for bleeding decreases the time needed to achieve therapeutic prolongation of APTT, when compared with nonprotocol physician management.     

Osmotic serum pressure in patients treated with furosemide and hypertonic mannitol solution

In patients with expanding intracranial lesion syndrome osmotic pressure of the serum was measured during administration of furosemide or 20% mannitol solution. Mannitol was administered by two methods: a) a dose of 1.5 g/kg during 3--4 hours, b) a dose of 1 g/kg for about 20 min. When mannitol was administered slowly the osmotic pressure of the serum at the end of infusion was 11--15% above the initial one and returned to the initial level 30--60 min. after the end of infusion. With rapid infusion the peak rise of pressure was observed after 30 min. usually after the end of infusion, and after one hour the pressure returned to values approaching the initial ones. Furosemide in a dose of 40 mg intramuscularly or intravenously caused slight changes of osmotic pressure reaching 13 mOsm/l.     

Establishing an institution-specific therapeutic range for heparin

The relationship between heparin concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in pooled plasma was compared with that in patient samples to assess the feasibility of using heparin-spiked pooled plasma in determining a therapeutic range for aPTT. Blood samples were taken from 32 patients who had been receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin sodium for more than 24 hours. The samples were stored at -70 degrees C until anti-Xa assay within three months of collection. Pooled normal plasma was spiked with unfractionated heparin sodium to produce nominal anti-Xa concentrations of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 unit/mL. Heparin concentrations and a aPTT values were measured, and the relationship between the two was determined by linear regression. For the ex vivo samples, the range of aPTT values corresponding to therapeutic heparin concentrations of 0.3-0.7 anti-Xa unit/mL was 64-106 seconds, which corresponds to an aPTT range of 2.3-3.9 times the mean of the normal range (compared with the traditionally defined therapeutic range of 1.5-2.5 times the control value). For the in vitro samples, the aPTT range corresponding to heparin concentrations of 0.3-0.7 unit/mL was 121-256 seconds, which corresponds to an aPTT range of 4.4-9.4 times the mean of the normal range. Each institution should establish a therapeutic aPTT range by calibrating aPTT values against heparin concentrations from blood samples of patients receiving intravenous heparin.     

Inability of the activated partial thromboplastin time to predict heparin levels. Time to reassess guidelines for heparin assays

BACKGROUND: In treating venous thromboembolic disorders, patient outcomes appear to correlate with heparin levels. Due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations, a relationship between heparin dose and level cannot be reliably predicted in individual patients. Some patients have low heparin levels despite therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs), which may increase their risk for recurrent thromboembolism. Patients with high heparin requirements appear to have fewer bleeding episodes with heparin level-guided therapy. The aPTT does not reliably correlate with heparin blood concentrations or antithrombotic effects. Consequently, heparin therapy monitored with heparin levels may be more effective and safer. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively determine whether (1) the aPTT therapeutic range adequately predicts heparin levels in 38 patients used to establish the therapeutic aPTT range as is currently recommended and (2) whether 3 paired sets of aPTT-antifactor Xa levels provide the basis for using aPTTs to predict subsequent heparin levels in individual patients (n = 27) receiving intravenous heparin for coronary artery disease or venous thromboembolic disease. RESULTS: In the therapeutic aPTT range established, the R2 value for the relationship was 0.4. Prediction intervals were wide. For an aPTT of 60 seconds, the 95% prediction interval estimates were heparin levels of 0.05 to 1.0 U/mL. In individual patients, the aPTT-antifactor Xa relationship had an average R2 value of 0.75. There was no consistent relationship between the aPTT and anti-factor Xa level in a significant number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The aPTT does not appear to be a useful surrogate for heparin levels. These findings suggest that the current recommendations on the use of heparin levels should be expanded.     

A new route of heparin administration--the lung

Instillation of a single dose of heparin into the lungs of the dog resulted in a steady prolonged hypocoagulability as measured by the Lee and White clotting time, partial thromboplastin and activated partial thromboplastin times. 15 mg of heparin/kg increased clotting time three to five times control values. The anticoagulant effect occurred within one hour and lasted 48 h or more, in contrast to the short effect of intravenous heparin. For doses of 8, 10, 12, 15 and 20 mg/kg, there was a corresponding increase in the area under the response curve. The very prolonged moderate anticoagulant state with intrapulmonary heparin did not show the wide fluctuations in coagulation test values which occur with intravenous heparin.     

Response to beta blockers in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope: how to predict beneficial effects

No definitive data are available about the possibility of predicting improvement in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope treated with beta blockers. Among 112 patients with syncope and a positive head-up tilt test (HUT), independent predictors for prevention of symptoms with beta blockers were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Each patient underwent HUT at 70 degrees for 20 minutes both in the drug-free state and during isoproterenol infusion given to increase the heart rate by at least 25%. Fifty-nine patients had a positive HUT during isoproterenol infusion and 53 in the drug-free state. All patients were then given esmolol infusion at 500 micrograms/kg per minute for 3 minutes followed by 300 micrograms/kg per minute maintenance dose. HUT was then repeated as previously described with or without isoproterenol, depending upon the initial positive response. Regardless of the response during esmolol, all patients were treated with metoprolol 50 to 100 mg twice daily. At follow-up, 36 patients experienced symptom relapse. Four of them had negative HUT on esmolol, whereas the remaining 32 did not respond to the acute infusion of esmolol. Only four patients with positive HUT on esmolol had a favorable response to metoprolol. Patients responding to metoprolol were older (55 +/- 12 years vs 42 +/- 15 years, P < 0.05). Response to metoprolol was predicted by a negative test on esmolol (P < 0.0001) and a positive HUT on isoproterenol (P < 0.001). Age older than 42 years was also associated with a higher likelihood of metoprolol success (P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Acute challenge with esmolol infusion appears to be an accurate predictor of response to chronic beta blockers, together with age and a positive HUT during low-dose isoproterenol infusion.