Danish multicenter randomized study of invasive versus conservative treatment in patients with inducible ischemia after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (DANAMI). DANish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: The aim of the DANish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANAMI) study was to compare an invasive strategy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with a conservative strategy in patients with inducible myocardial ischemia who received thrombolytic treatment for a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 503 patients randomized to an invasive strategy, PTCA was performed in 266 (52.9%) and CABG in 147 (29.2%) from 2 to 10 weeks after the AMI. Of the 505 patients in the conservative treatment group, only 8 (1.6%) had been revascularized 2 months after the AMI. The patients were followed up from 1 to 4.5 years. The primary end points were mortality, reinfarction, and admission with unstable angina. At 2.4 years' follow-up (median), mortality was 3.6% in the invasive treatment group and 4.4% in the conservative treatment group (not significant). Invasive treatment was associated with a lower incidence of AMI (5.6% versus 10.5%; P=.0038) and a lower incidence of admission for unstable angina (17.9% versus 29.5%; P<.00001). The percentages of patients with a primary end point were 15.4% and 29.5% at 1 year, 23.5% and 36.6% at 2 years, and 31.7% versus 44.0% at 4 years (P=<.00001) in the invasive and conservative treatment groups, respectively. At 12 months, stable angina pectoris was present in 21% of patients in the invasive treatment group and 43% in the conservative treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive treatment in post-AMI patients with inducible ischemia results in a reduction in the incidence of reinfarction, fewer admissions due to unstable angina, and lower prevalence of stable angina. We conclude that patients with inducible ischemia before discharge who have received treatment with thrombolytic drugs for their first AMI should be referred to coronary arteriography and revascularized accordingly.     

Influence of systemic arterial hypertension on mid-term survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytic agents

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study to asses the effect of systemic arterial hypertension on mid-term survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction who received thrombolytic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied 202 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction, admitted in the Coronary Care Unit of the Hospital Xeral de Galicia who received intravenous thrombolytic therapy within six hours from the onset of symptoms. The thrombolytics used were: urokinase (79.7%), rt-PA (9.9%), streptokinase (4.9%) and APSAC (5.5%). Left heart catheterization with coronary angiography was performed in 162 patients at 2 weeks after infarction. Patency of the infarction-related artery (IRA) was classified according to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria. A patent artery weas defined as having TIMI grades 2 or 3 antegrade flow. RESULTS: Systemic arterial hypertension was found in 34.7% of patients. IRA patency (TIMI 2-3) was demonstrated in the 75.3% of the patients. Early mortality (first month) was 5.4%. Multivariate analysis identified cardiogenic shock as the only variable with independent predictive value for early mortality. Mean follow-up was for 24 +/- 19 months. Late mortality was 5.2% and cardiac death occurred in 4.2% of patients. Reinfarction occurred in 3.1% of patients. Congestive heart failure, arterial hypertension and reinfarction adversely affected prognosis. Actuarial survival at the end of follow-up period was significantly lower in patients with systemic arterial hypertension (70.4% vs 85.9%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that systemic arterial hypertension adversely affects mid-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction who received thrombolytic treatment.     

Does PTCA in acute myocardial infarction affect mortality and reinfarction rates? A quantitative overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is often performed after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) either as an adjuvant to thrombolytic therapy or instead of thrombolysis. The effect of PTCA in AMI on mortality and reinfarction has remained unclear, with the available randomized trials indicating inconsistent results. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic overview (meta-analysis) of the randomized trials was conducted to assess the effect of PTCA in AMI on mortality and reinfarction rates. Data from 7 trials in which primary PTCA was evaluated and 16 trials in which PTCA after thrombolysis was studied were included in this overview, comprising a total of 8496 patient. The trials represented different approaches to the timing of PTCA after AMI. The trials of PTCA after thrombolytic therapy were also categorized according to the different protocols with respect to the routine or elective character of PTCA in the invasive group. A reduction in short-term (6 week) mortality (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33, 0.94) and in the combined outcome of short-term mortality and nonfatal reinfarction (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.80) was observed in the trials comparing primary PTCA with thrombolytic therapy. In contrast, in trials in which an approach of thrombolysis and PTCA was compared with thrombolytic therapy alone, there was no important difference in early mortality, with an apparent reduction in mortality between 6 and 52 weeks. The lower mortality between 6 and 52 weeks among 6-week survivors seemed to be restricted to the subgroup of trials in which PTCA was used as a routine strategy (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39, 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Although the analyses of the various categories of trials suggest that primary PTCA may be more beneficial than thrombolytic therapy in AMI, these data should be interpreted cautiously unless confirmed by larger studies. In contrast, the addition of various other strategies of PTCA to thrombolytic therapy does not convincingly indicate a clinically different outcome than if a more conservative strategy is followed, in which PTCA is used only if clinically indicated. Some specific strategies, however, such as rescue PTCA in high-risk patients with occluded arteries, may be of benefit.     

Effect on outcome of the presence or absence of chest pain at initiation of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy in acute myocardial infarction. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Investigators

To ascertain whether the outcome of patients with suspected myocardial infarction differs when chest pain is still present at initiation of thrombolytic therapy, participants in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Phase II study, all of whom presented within 4 hours of symptoms onset, were retrospectively divided into 2 groups: (1) those with chest pain present at onset of intravenous thrombolysis, n = 3,000; and (2) those who were free of chest pain on beginning intravenous thrombolytic therapy, n = 337. Patients free of chest pain were older (58 vs 57 years, p = 0.01), more often women (23 vs 17%, p = 0.01), had fewer electrocardiographic leads with ST elevation (3.8 vs 4.1, p < 0.001), and the presenting event was confirmed less often as myocardial infarction than as chest pain without infarction (88 vs 96%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for in-hospital death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemic events, stroke, overall hemorrhagic complications, coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. At 6-weeks follow-up, more pain-free patients had resting ejection fraction > 0.55 (35 vs 31%, p = 0.001) and fewer developed congestive heart failure (12 vs 20%). At 1-year follow-up, fewer pain-free patients developed congestive heart failure (15 vs 21%, p = 0.009), but no differences existed between the 2 groups in frequency of death, reinfarction, coronary angioplasty, bypass surgery or anginal class. Thus, there are several observations in patients who were free of chest pain at onset of lytic therapy. (1) The majority developed enzymatic or electrocardiographic evidence of acute myocardial infarction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Metastatic carcinoma of the prostate mimicking primary carcinoid tumor of the lung and mediastinum

AIMS: To investigate the current use of thrombolytic therapy in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction and to determine the potential for an increased use of thrombolysis or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: All hospitalised cases of acute myocardial infarction were identified in three health districts in the UK (population of 960,000) in patients under the age of 76 years during a 2-year period; 2439 patients had acute myocardial infarction, of whom 1264 (52%) received thrombolytic therapy. Failure to administer thrombolytic therapy was a result of the absence of diagnostic electrocardiograms in 712 (29.2%) patients, late presentation in 127 (5.2%), therapeutic error in 112 (4.6%), presence of a bleeding risk in 139 (5.7%) and other miscellaneous reasons in 80 (3.3%) patients. Thirty-eight of the 139 patients in whom bleeding risk was reported as a contra-indication could, in retrospect, have received thrombolytic therapy and a further 76 would have been suitable for primary PTCA. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for increasing the use of thrombolytic therapy seems to be limited and is unlikely to make a major impact on the in-hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction. However, primary PTCA should be considered in those who are ineligible for thrombolysis because of bleeding risk as a contra-indication.     

Early and long-term results of direct PTCA in patients with acute myocardial infarct

A review of the literature suggests that direct PTCA for acute myocardial infarction is indicated and feasible in 90-95% of unselected, consecutive patients; direct PTCA is reported to be successful in > 90% of procedures. This results in a hospital mortality of 3-7% for unselected patients and a 4% re-infarction rate. A recent meta-analysis of direct PTCA vs i.v. thrombolysis in patients with acute infarction demonstrates a lower mortality after PTCA (4.4% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02) as well as lower mortality/re-infarction rate (7.2% vs 11.9%, p < 0.001). Mortality in the 1st year after discharge is < 5% with about half of the fatalities being due to cardiac causes. Patients presenting with or developing cardiogenic shock in the acute infarct phase experience a 20-50% acute mortality. Mortality rests at < 10% in these patients in the first year after discharge. In conclusion, (1) direct PTCA is feasible without additional risks in patients with acute myocardial infarction, (2) angiographic and clinical success rates of direct PTCA are favorable and superior to i.v. thrombolysis in the hands of expert operators, and (3) referral to an institution providing the option of immediate, direct PTCA must be considered in the patient with acute infarction but contraindication(s) to i.v. thrombolysis.     

Dietary-sodium-induced cardiac remodeling in spontaneously hypertensive rat versus Wistar-Kyoto rat

OBJECTIVE: To determine lengths and causes of pre- and in-hospital delays in thrombolytic treatment. DESIGN: A prospective national survey covering 48 of the 51 Finnish university, central and general hospitals to obtain basic data before the start of a public campaign to shorten patient-related delay in acute myocardial infarction. SUBJECTS: One thousand and twelve consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who received thrombolytic therapy over 3 months in 1995 and who represent 40% of all patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The median interval between onset of infarction symptoms and initiation of thrombolytic therapy was 160 min (30-647). Only 13% of the patients received thrombolysis within 60 min and 38% within 120 min. The median time from the onset of symptoms to the call for help was 60 min (5-491), and no difference was found in patients with or without a history of previous myocardial infarction (60 and 64 min, respectively). Only 52% of the patients called to the dispatch centre. The median delay from calling for help to hospital arrival was 40 min (10-170). The median in-hospital door-to-needle thrombolysis delay was 40 min (12-196). In 13% of hospitals the median delay was more than 60 min. The emergency physician encountered difficulties in decision making in 33% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Only 38% of the patient received thrombolysis within 2 h of onset of symptoms. Patient-related delay before they sought help accounted for the major portion of the total treatment delay. Thus the findings emphasize the importance of prompt action when people are confronted with an acute heart attack. Reorganizing the emergency medical service and emergency department routines is also a necessary target to shorten thrombolysis delays. The delay attributable to transporting patients could be shortened by initiating thrombolytic treatment in the pre-hospital setting. In Finnish hospitals, door-to-needle delay was acceptable in cases with clear indications for thrombolysis. However, emergency physicians often had diagnostic difficulties, which led to remarkably longer in-hospital delays.     

One-year outcomes of diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Risk factors and outcomes associated with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) in diabetics and nondiabetics were analyzed for 376 consecutive patients, 77 with diabetes (20%) and 299 nondiabetics (80%), who had non-Q-wave MI and had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) performed before discharge from hospital during the period from January 1992 to February 1996. Diabetics were slightly older (64 +/- 10 years vs 61 +/- 12 years, p <0.053), had more prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery (27% vs 12%, p <0.001), and hypertension (77% vs 49%, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in unstable angina, saphenous vein graft PTCA, single versus multiple vessel disease, or history of MI. PTCA success rates for diabetics versus nondiabetics were similar (96% vs 97%, p = NS). In-hospital complications such CABG, recurrent MI, repeat PTCA, stroke, and death were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. At 1-year follow-up, survival in diabetics (92%) was similar to nondiabetics (94%, p = NS), although event-free survival (PTCA, CABG, MI, death) was worse in diabetics (55% vs 67% for nondiabetics, p <0.05). Although diabetic patients with non-Q-wave MI represent a cohort with more risk factors for poor outcome, aggressive in-hospital revascularization with PTCA results in an excellent short-term outcome as well as 1-year survival similar to the nondiabetic patients. However, total events at 1-year follow-up are more common in the diabetic patients, suggesting that more aggressive screening and therapy in follow-up may be warranted, and that a diabetic with non-Q-wave MI will require increased utilization of cardiovascular resources in the first year after the event.     

Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators

BACKGROUND: Left bundle-branch block (BBB) is considered an important predictor of poor outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction, but the consequences of right BBB are not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To 1) estimate the prevalence of left and right BBB in patients with myocardial infarction; 2) compare the clinical characteristics of and treatments received by patients with left, right, or no BBB; and 3) determine the independent association of left BBB and right BBB with in-hospital death. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter registry of 1571 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: 297,832 patients with acute myocardial infarction who had left, right, or no BBB on initial electrocardiography. MEASUREMENTS: Presence and type of BBB, clinical characteristics of patients, therapies given, and in-hospital death. RESULTS: Patients with left BBB (n = 19,967; 6.7%) or right BBB (n = 18,354; 6.2%) were older and had more comorbid illness and congestive heart failure than patients with no BBB. Among patients for whom thrombolytic therapy was clearly indicated, fewer patients with left or right BBB (16.6% and 32.0%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (66.5%) received this therapy (P < 0.001). Fewer patients with left or right BBB (60.6% and 67.3%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (75.6%) received aspirin within the first 24 hours (P < 0.001), and fewer patients with left or right BBB (23.9% and 31.8%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (40.4%) received beta-blockers within the first 24 hours (P < 0.001). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were almost twice as high for patients with left or right BBB (22.6% and 23.0%, respectively) as for patients with no BBB (13.1%) (P < 0.001). Compared with no BBB and no ST-segment elevation, left BBB was associated with a 34% increase (odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.28 to 1.39]) and right BBB was associated with a 64% increase (odds ratio, 1.64 [CI, 1.57 to 1.71]) in the risk for in-hospital death, after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, prevalences of right and left BBB are similar. Patients with BBB have more comorbid conditions, are less likely to receive therapy, and have an increased risk for in-hospital death compared with patients with no BBB. Compared with left BBB, right BBB seems to be a stronger independent predictor of in-hospital death.     

Prognostic significance of ST segment shift early after resolution of ST elevation in patients with myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy: the GUSTO-I ST Segment Monitoring Substudy

OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the relation between recurrent ST segment shift within 6 to 24 h of initial resolution of ST elevation after thrombolytic therapy and 30-day and 1-year mortality. BACKGROUND: Rapid and stable resolution of ST segment elevation in relation to thrombolytic therapy in patients with an acute myocardial infarction is an indicator of culprit artery patency. Whether recurrence of ST segment shift during continuous ST monitoring after initial resolution is related to poor prognosis has not been studied. METHODS: ST segment monitoring was performed within 30 min after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The predictive value of a new ST segment shift (assessed as > or = 0.1-mV deviation from the baseline) 6 to 24 h after thrombolytic therapy was studied with respect to 30-day and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Of 734 patients, 243 had a new ST segment shift (33%). The 30-day mortality rate in patients with an ST shift (7.8%) was significantly higher than that in patients without an ST shift (2.25%, p = 0.001), as was the 1-year mortality rate (10.3% vs. 5.7%, respectively, p = 0.025). Multivariable analysis revealed an independent predictive value of ST shift with respect to 30-day mortality (p = 0.008), even after consideration of multiple clinical risk factors in the overall Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO)-I mortality model (p = 0.0001). Moreover, the duration of the ST shift bore a direct relation with 1-year mortality (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Detection of ST segment shift early after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction is a simple, noninvasive means of identifying patients at high risk and is superior to other commonly assessed clinical risk factors. Thus, patients with a new ST shift after the first 6 h, but within 24 h, represent a high risk group that may benefit from more aggressive intervention, whereas patients without evidence of an ST shift represent a low risk subgroup.     

Comparison of outcome of primary PTCA for acute myocardial infarction in patients younger and older than 70 years of age

BACKGROUND: The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial infarction Study Group reported that the benefit of primary PTCA was observed mainly among patients who were classified as "not low risk" including those over age 70, with anterior infarction and heart rate > 100 bpm. The present study compares procedural success rate and in-hospital and one-month clinical outcome of primary PTCA in acute myocardial infarction patients < 70 and > or = 70 years of age. METHODS AND RESULTS: During 1995 121 patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent primary PTCA within 6 hours of symptoms onset or within 24 hours in case of evidence of ongoing ischemia. Eighty-two patients (Group I) were < 70 (mean age 56 +/- 9) and 39 patients (Group II) were > or = 70 (mean age 75 +/- 3). In group II there was a trend, although not significant, toward a higher prevalence of prior angina and infarction. Multivessel disease was more frequent in group II than in group I (69% vs 48%; p = 0.041). Ejection fraction was markedly depressed in both groups (38 +/- 10% in group I vs 34 +/- 11% in group II). Ejection fraction < or = 30% and shock on admission were more frequent in group II (39% vs 15% and 36% vs 21%, respectively). Optimal angiographic success (< or = 30% stenosis associated with TIMI grade 3 flow) was achieved in 77% of group II and in 98% of group I (p = 0.00059). The in-hospital mortality rate was 26% in group II and 1.2% in group I (p = 0.000042). Shock on admission and PTCA failure predicted high mortality rates. There was no difference between the two groups as regards to non-fatal reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, life-threatening arrhythmias, severe heart failure, revascularization procedures. There were no strokes. At one-month follow-up, recurrence of ischemia or positive response to stress test were more frequent in group II (24% vs 8%; p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction < 70 years of age primary coronary angioplasty is associated with low rates of mortality and cardiac events. Mortality rate remains high in patients over age 70, especially when shock is present on admission or PTCA falls.     

Evaluation of drug treatment of myocardial infarction in public hospitals of Andalusia. GAUME (Andalusian Group for performance of Studies on Drug Utilization)

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed over the last decade. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacologic treatment of AMI in the clinical practice, with special emphasis in thrombolytic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective drug utilization survey, collecting data from 26 hospitals belonging to the Andalusian Health Service, Spain, during one month period. Pharmacologic treatment in the first 24 h was obtained. RESULTS: Out of 379 patients recruited, 52.8% received thrombolytic therapy, although another 19% could have obtained some benefit from that therapy. Alteplase was the most frequently used thrombolytic (65.5%). The regimen prescribed was mainly that followed in GUSTO Study (45.8%) or double bolus (43.5%). In a high percentage of patients the thrombolytic selection was not made according to the results of the literature. Women and patients older than 75 years were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy. There was a high utilization of aspirin (89.7%), nitrates (84.4%) and heparin (83.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy was prescribed in a higher percentage of patients than is reported in other trials. In spite of that, thrombolytics should have been used in more patients. As alteplase does not have a definitive benefit over streptokinase, protocol is needed when selecting a thrombolytic agent.     

Thrombolysis following myocardial infarct. European Secondary Prevention Study

For evaluation of the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction, all cases of ten Zurich hospitals (278, 184 men and 94 women) in the period from 1 January to 31 March 1993 were analyzed retrospectively. 223 patients were released from hospital, 55 died. A follow-up was done 6 months after the patient's discharge by means of a questionnaires to the family doctor (return rate: 65.9%). 48.5% of patients were referred to hospital within the first 6 h. after onset of symptoms, 64% within the first 12 h. 28% (n = 76) of the patients received a thrombolytic therapy, of which 91% (n = 69) got streptokinase and 9% (n = 7) got tissue plasminogen activator. In 81% of the cases the thrombolytic therapy was done within the first hour in hospital, in accumulated 97% of the cases within two hours. In the age group under 65 years (39% of the patients, n = 109), 48 patients received thrombolysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0). In the age group between 65 and 74 years (24.5 % of the patients, n = 68), 19 patients received thrombolysis (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.42-0.99; p < 0.05), and in the age group over 74 years (36.5% of the patients, n = 101), 9 patients were received thrombolysis (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05-0.28; p < 0.0001). 31% of the patients (n = 46) received a coronary angiography, 15% (n = 22) had coronary angioplasty, and 11% (n = 1) received coronary bypass surgery. There is evidence that there should be more importance attached to early hospitalization, if acute myocardial infarction is suspected. Thereby age alone should be considered as a contraindication for thrombolytic therapy. The issue of assumed underuse of thrombolytic therapy should be investigated all over Switzerland.     

Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to determine the relative risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: Due to an expanding population of patients with surgically treated coronary artery disease and the natural progression of atherosclerosis, an increasing number of patients with previous CABG require repeat revascularization procedures. Although there are randomized comparative data for CABG versus medical therapy and, more recently, versus PTCA, these studies have excluded patients with previous CABG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 632 patients with previous CABG who required either elective re-CABG (n = 164) or PTCA (n = 468) at a single center during 1987 through 1988. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (83% vs. 85% male), age > 70 years (21% vs. 23%), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (46% vs. 48%), presence of class III or IV angina (70% vs. 63%) and three-vessel coronary artery disease (77% vs. 74%). RESULTS: Complete revascularization was achieved in 38% of patients with PTCA and 92% of those with re-CABG (p < 0.0001). The in-hospital complication rates were significantly lower in the PTCA group: death (0.3% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.0001) and Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) (0.9% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.0001). Actuarial survival was equivalent at 1 year (PTCA 95% vs. re-CABG 91%) and 6 years (PTCA 74% vs. re-CABG 73%) of follow-up (p = 0.32). Both procedures resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from dealth or Q wave MI) and relief of angina; however, the need for repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization, or both, by 6 years was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 64% vs. re-CABG 8%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age > 70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, unstable angina, number of diseased vessels and diabetes mellitus as independent correlates of mortality for the entire group. CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized series of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization, an initial stategy of either PTCA or re-CABG resulted in equivalent overall survival, event-free survival and relief of angina. PTCA offers lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks, although it is associated with less complete revascularization and a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.     

Value of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, Holter monitoring and clinical variables for prediction of arrhythmic events in survivors of acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the ability of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and Holter electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring and clinical variables to identify patients at risk of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. BACKGROUND: Most studies of signal-averaged electrocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and Holter ECG monitoring in risk stratification after myocardial infarction preceded the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: A consecutive series of 301 survivors of myocardial infarction, 205 (68%) of whom received thrombolytic agents, underwent signal-averaged electrocardiography (1st 48 h, day 6 and discharge), Holter ECG monitoring (days 6 to 7) and radionuclide left ventriculography (days 7 to 14). Median follow-up time was 1.03 years. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (4.3%) had an arrhythmic event (sudden death in 11, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia in 2). The 25-Hz high pass filtered signal-averaged ECG at discharge was 64% sensitive (95% confidence intervals [CI] 36% to 92%) and 81% specific (95% CI 76% to 86%). High grade ventricular ectopic activity on the Holter ECG was only 38% sensitive (95% CI 12% to 64%) and 74% specific (95% CI 71% to 77%). Left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.4 was the best test for prediction of arrhythmic events (sensitivity 75% [95% CI 50% to 100%] and specificity 81% [95% CI 76% to 85%]). In multivariate analysis, in rank order, digoxin therapy at discharge, an abnormal 25-Hz signal-averaged ECG before discharge, absence of angina before index infarction and previous infarction were predictive of arrhythmic events. With digoxin therapy excluded, ejection fraction was an independent predictor. Discriminant analysis identified a high risk group (12% of the study patients) with an event rate of 26%. CONCLUSIONS: The signal-averaged ECG and left ventricular ejection fraction are each independently predictive of arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction, but the Holter ECG is not. A combination of clinical and investigative variables, including the signal-averaged ECG, best identifies patients at highest risk.     

Randomized comparison of direct thrombin inhibition versus heparin in conjunction with fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-IIb Trial. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) Investigators

OBJECTIVES: We sought to show that hirudin might interact differently with streptokinase (SK) and tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), which could reduce the incidence of death or reinfarction at 30 days. BACKGROUND: In a large-scale trial of patients with acute coronary syndromes, hirudin provided modest benefit compared with heparin. However, the interaction with thrombolytic agents was not specifically assessed. METHODS: Patients with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction and electrocardiographic ST segment elevation were treated with thrombolytic therapy and randomly assigned to receive hirudin or heparin. RESULTS: A total of 2,274 patients received t-PA, and 1,015 received SK. Baseline characteristics were balanced by antithrombin assignment. Among SK-treated patients, death or reinfarction at 30 days occurred more often in those treated with adjunctive heparin (14.4%) rather than hirudin (8.6%, odds ratio [OR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20 to 2.66, p = 0.004). Among t-PA-treated patients, the rates were 10.9% with heparin and 10.3% with hirudin (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.38, p = 0.68; for treatment heterogeneity: chi-square 4.20, degrees of freedom [df] 1, p = 0.04). After adjustment for baseline differences between thrombolytic groups, the rates were 9.1% for SK with hirudin, 10.3% for t-PA with hirudin, 10.5% for t-PA with heparin and 14.9% for SK with heparin (for treatment heterogeneity: chi-square 4.5, df 1, p = 0.03), suggesting that the beneficial treatment effect of hirudin was limited to the SK-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hirudin interacts favorably with SK but not t-PA, highlighting the importance of thrombin activity after SK therapy and the potential for simulating the effects of a more potent fibrinolytic agent through direct antithrombin therapy.     

Influence of infarct-related artery patency on the indexes of parasympathetic activity and prevalence of late potentials in survivors of acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether infarct-related coronary artery patency influences myocardial electrical stability as measured by the prevalence of late potentials or heart rate variability. BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that loss of vagal activity is associated with an increased incidence of arrhythmic death after myocardial infarction. METHODS: A short-duration, high resolution electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed before hospital discharge in 175 patients with a first myocardial infarction. Seventy-three patients received thrombolytic therapy. All patients underwent coronary angiography. Coronary occlusion was defined as minimal or no anterograde flow. Eighty-eight patients (50.3%) had an occluded infarct-related artery. Sixty-two healthy subjects served as control subjects to determine the normal range of heart rate variability. RESULTS: Comparison between the control group and patients without patency of the infarct-related artery in the time domain and spectral analyses revealed in the latter patients a reduced heart rate variability (p < 0.0001) and a lower power spectrum density in both the 0.05- to 0.15-Hz band (p < 0.0001) and the 0.15- to 0.35-Hz band (p < 0.0001). The heart rate variability in patients with late potentials was lower than in those with a normal signal-averaged ECG. Those patients with spontaneous or thrombolysis-induced reperfusion have less occurrence of late potentials and higher parasympathetic activity than do patients with a closed artery. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the patency of the infarct-related artery determines both the absence of late potentials and the preservation of vagal tone and may explain the reduction in mortality induced by thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction.     

Revascularization in patients with prior coronary bypass surgery

Increasingly over the past several years, patients have returned after coronary surgery for reintervention procedures. This reflects immediate postsurgical complications and the relentless progression of coronary artery disease in the native circulation and in the bypass grafts. Although there are randomized comparative data for coronary bypass surgery (CABG) versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and medical therapy, these trials have always excluded patients with previous (GABG). OBJECTIVES: We attempted to compare the risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study examines follow up data (15.4 +/- 11.0 months) from 130 patients with previous CABG, who required either PTCA (Group A, n = 73) or re-CABG (Group B; n = 57) at a single center from 1994 to 1997. Follow up data were obtained from subsequent office visits and telephone calls. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (86% vs 94% males), mean age (62 +/- 9 vs 59 +/- 10 years), angina CCS classes 3 and 4 (73% vs 69%), diminished left ventricular function (23% vs 26%), risk factors such as diabetes (19% vs 17%), hypercolesterolemia (49% vs 45%) and smoking (48% vs 39%) and three-vessel native coronary artery disease (67% vs 72%). The symptomatic status prior to the revascularization procedure was similar in both groups. Complete and functional revascularization was achieved in 85% of the PTCA group and in 92% of those with re-CABG (p = NS). During the hospital stay the complication rates were lower in the PTCA group. Actuarial survival was different at follow up (p = 0.04). Both PTCA and re-CABG groups resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina and urgent revascularization). The need for repeat revascularization at follow up was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 28% vs re-CABG 10%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized study of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization procedures, PTCA resulted in lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks. At follow up, both PTCA or CABG were similar for event-free survival; PTCA offered lower overall mortality, although it is associated to a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.     

Long-term beneficial effect of late reperfusion for acute anterior myocardial infarction with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND: Although the short-term and long-term beneficial effects of early coronary revascularization by primary PTCA or thrombolytic therapy have been established for acute myocardial infarction, thrombolytic therapy >24 hours after the onset of acute myocardial infarction has not been shown to improve clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of late revascularization by primary PTCA over a 5-year period. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with initial Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction >24 hours after onset were randomized into a PTCA group (n=44) and a no-PTCA group (n=39). Long-term follow-up was conducted with regard to end points, which included cardiac death, nonfatal recurrence of myocardial infarction, and development of congestive heart failure. Left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion at 6 months after myocardial infarction were similar in the 2 groups. Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes were significantly smaller in the PTCA group than in the no-PTCA group (P<0.0001). With cardiac events as end points, a 5-year Kaplan-Meier event-free survival analysis revealed that the no-PTCA group had a worse prognosis than the PTCA group (P<0.0001). Patency of the infarct-related artery, left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume index, and end-systolic volume index were significantly associated with cardiac events by a Cox proportional hazards analysis (hazard ratios 0.120, 0.845, 1.065, and 1.164, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In initial Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction, we conclude that even with late reperfusion, PTCA had beneficial effects on cardiac events over the 5-year period after myocardial infarction, with the prevention of left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction being a possible mechanism.     

Dipyridamole thallium-201 imaging very early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and prognostic value of dipyridamole 201T1 imaging very early after acute myocardial infarction in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy. Fifty-two consecutive patients with an uncomplicated clinical course underwent quantitative planar dipyridamole 201T1 imaging 2 5 days after acute myocardial infarction. The patients were followed for 14 +/- 7 months after discharge. No major complications occurred during the test. Of the 30 patients with redistribution, five (16.6%) developed in-hospital unstable angina as against none of the 22 patients without redistribution. During follow-up, a total of live late cardiac events were observed: two deaths and two cases of unstable angina in the group with reversible defects and one reinfarction in the group with fixed defects. The 1-year actuarial probability of being free of cardiac events was, respectively, 66 +/- 10% and 94 +/- 5% in the patients with and without redistribution (P < 0.01). In conclusion, in patients treated with thrombolysis, dipyridamole-201T1 imaging very early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction is a feasible and safe test. Patients with fixed defects appear to be at low risk and may be candidates for early discharge; the presence of redistribution identifies a subgroup of patients who may benefit from further careful clinical evaluation.