Conceptual design of aeroelastic structures by topology optimization

A topology optimization methodology is presented for the conceptual design of aeroelastic structures accounting for the fluid–structure interaction. The geometrical layout of the internal structure, such as the layout of stiffeners in a wing, is optimized by material topology optimization. The topology of the wet surface, that is, the fluid–structure interface, is not varied. The key components of the proposed methodology are a Sequential Augmented Lagrangian method for solving the resulting large-scale parameter optimization problem, a staggered procedure for computing the steady-state solution of the underlying nonlinear aeroelastic analysis problem, and an analytical adjoint method for evaluating the coupled aeroelastic sensitivities. The fluid–structure interaction problem is modeled by a three-field formulation that couples the structural displacements, the flow field, and the motion of the fluid mesh. The structural response is simulated by a three-dimensional finite element method, and the aerodynamic loads are predicted by a three-dimensional finite volume discretization of a nonlinear Euler flow. The proposed methodology is illustrated by the conceptual design of wing structures. The optimization results show the significant influence of the design dependency of the loads on the optimal layout of flexible structures when compared with results that assume a constant aerodynamic load.     

Reliability-based topology optimization

The objective of this work is to integrate reliability analysis into topology optimization problems. The new model, in which we introduce reliability constraints into a deterministic topology optimization formulation, is called Reliability-Based Topology Optimization (RBTO). Several applications show the importance of this integration. The application of the RBTO model gives a different topology relative to deterministic topology optimization. We also find that the RBTO model yields structures that are more reliable than those produced by deterministic topology optimization (for the same weight).     

Reliability-based structural optimization of frame structures for multiple failure criteria using topology optimization techniques

Topology optimization methods using discrete elements such as frame elements can provide useful insights into the underlying mechanics principles of products; however, the majority of such optimizations are performed under deterministic conditions. To avoid performance reductions due to later-stage environmental changes, variations of several design parameters are considered during the topology optimization. This paper concerns a reliability-based topology optimization method for frame structures that considers uncertainties in applied loads and nonstructural mass at the early conceptual design stage. The effects that multiple criteria, namely, stiffness and eigenfrequency, have upon system reliability are evaluated by regarding them as a series system, where mode reliabilities can be evaluated using first-order reliability methods. Through numerical calculations, reliability-based topology designs of typical two- or three-dimensional frames are obtained. The importance of considering uncertainties is then demonstrated by comparing the results obtained by the proposed method with deterministic optimal designs.     

Reliability-based design optimization for elastoplastic mechanical structures

In this paper, two special formulations to carry out a reliability-based design optimization of elastoplastic mechanical structures are introduced. The first approach is based on a well-known two-level method where the first level involves the optimization for the design parameters whereas the evaluation of the probabilistic constraints is carried out in a sub-optimization level. Because the evaluation of the probabilistic constraints in a sub-optimization level causes non-convergence behavior for some problems as indicated in the literature, an alternative formulation based on one-level is developed considering the optimality conditions of the β-computation by which the probabilistic constraint appears in the first level reliability-based design optimization formulation. In both approaches, an explicit parameter optimization problem is proposed for the computation of a design point for elastoplastic structures.Three examples in this paper demonstrate that the one-level reliability-based design optimization formulation is superior in terms of convergence to an optimal design than the two-level reliability-based design optimization formulation.     

Reliability-based design optimization of problems with correlated input variables using a Gaussian Copula

The reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) using performance measure approach for problems with correlated input variables requires a transformation from the correlated input random variables into independent standard normal variables. For the transformation with correlated input variables, the two most representative transformations, the Rosenblatt and Nataf transformations, are investigated. The Rosenblatt transformation requires a joint cumulative distribution function (CDF). Thus, the Rosenblatt transformation can be used only if the joint CDF is given or input variables are independent. In the Nataf transformation, the joint CDF is approximated using the Gaussian copula, marginal CDFs, and covariance of the input correlated variables. Using the generated CDF, the correlated input variables are transformed into correlated normal variables and then the correlated normal variables are transformed into independent standard normal variables through a linear transformation. Thus, the Nataf transformation can accurately estimates joint normal and some lognormal CDFs of the input variable that cover broad engineering applications. This paper develops a PMA-based RBDO method for problems with correlated random input variables using the Gaussian copula. Several numerical examples show that the correlated random input variables significantly affect RBDO results.     

Reliability-based design optimization using probabilistic sufficiency factor

A probabilistic sufficiency factor approach is proposed that combines safety factor and probability of failure. The probabilistic sufficiency factor approach represents a factor of safety relative to a target probability of failure. It provides a measure of safety that can be used more readily than the probability of failure or the safety index by designers to estimate the required weight increase to reach a target safety level. The probabilistic sufficiency factor can be calculated from the results of Monte Carlo simulation with little extra computation. The paper presents the use of probabilistic sufficiency factor with a design response surface approximation, which fits it as a function of design variables. It is shown that the design response surface approximation for the probabilistic sufficiency factor is more accurate than that for the probability of failure or for the safety index. Unlike the probability of failure or the safety index, the probabilistic sufficiency factor does not suffer from accuracy problems in regions of low probability of failure when calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. The use of the probabilistic sufficiency factor accelerates the convergence of reliability-based design optimization.     

Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact

With the advent of powerful computers, vehicle safety issues have recently been addressed using computational methods of vehicle crashworthiness, resulting in reductions in cost and time for new vehicle development. Vehicle design demands multidisciplinary optimization coupled with a computational crashworthiness analysis. However, simulation-based optimization generates deterministic optimum designs, which are frequently pushed to the limits of design constraint boundaries, leaving little or no room for tolerances (uncertainty) in modeling, simulation uncertainties, and/or manufacturing imperfections. Consequently, deterministic optimum designs that are obtained without consideration of uncertainty may result in unreliable designs, indicating the need for Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO).Recent development in RBDO allows evaluations of probabilistic constraints in two alternative ways: using the Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and the Performance Measure Approach (PMA). The PMA using the Hybrid Mean Value (HMV) method is shown to be robust and efficient in the RBDO process, whereas RIA yields instability for some problems. This paper presents an application of PMA and HMV for RBDO for the crashworthiness of a large-scale vehicle side impact. It is shown that the proposed RBDO approach is very effective in obtaining a reliability-based optimum design.     

Robust formulation for Reliability-based design optimization of structures

The reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) has been widely recognized as a powerful optimization tool under probabilistic constraints, through appropriate modeling of uncertainties. However, the drawback of RBDO is that it does not reflect the ability of the structure to comply with large data variations, unforeseen actions or deterioration mechanisms. On the other hand, the robust design optimization (RDO) reduces the variability of the structural performance, in addition to its mean level. However, RDO does not take direct advantage of the interaction between controllable (product design values) and noise variables (environmental random values), and the obtained results do not accurately indicate what parameter has the highest effect on the performance characteristics. The purpose of this paper is to propose a robust formulation for reliability-based design optimization (RRBDO) that combines the advantages of both optimization procedures and overcomes their weaknesses. The optimization model proposed overcomes the limitations of the existing models without compromising the reliability level, by considering a robust convex objective function and a performance variation constraint. The proposed formulation can consider the total cost of structures and can control structural parameter variations. It takes into account uncertainty and variability in the same mathematical formulation. A numerical solution procedure is also developed, for which results are analyzed and compared with RBDO for several examples of concrete and steel structures.     

Efficient reliability-based design optimization using a hybrid space with application to finite element analysis

The design of high technology structures aims to define the best compromise between cost and safety. The Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) allows us to design structures which satisfy economical and safety requirements. However, in practical applications, the coupling between the mechanical modelling, the reliability analyses and the optimization methods leads to very high computational time and weak convergence stability. Traditionally, the solution of the RBDO model is achieved by alternating reliability and optimization iterations. This approach leads to low numerical efficiency, which is disadvantageous for engineering applications on real structures. In order to avoid this difficulty, we propose herein a very efficient method based on the simultaneous solution of the reliability and optimization problems. The procedure leads to parallel convergence for both problems in a Hybrid Design Space (HDS). The efficiency of the proposed methodology is demonstrated on the design of a steel hook, where the RBDO is combined with Finite Element Analysis (FEA).     

Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation

Reliability-based design sensitivity analysis involves studying the dependence of the failure probability on design parameters. Conventionally, this requires repeated evaluations of the failure probability for different values of the design parameters, which is a direct but computationally expensive task. An efficient simulation approach is presented to perform reliability-based design sensitivity analysis using only one simulation run. The approach is based on consideration of an ‘augmented reliability problem’ where the design parameters are artificially considered as uncertain. It is shown that the desired information about reliability sensitivity can be extracted through failure analysis of the augmented problem. The required computational effort is relatively insensitive to the number of uncertain parameters but generally grows exponentially with the number of design parameters whose sensitivity is to be studied. The latter implies that the proposed approach is applicable for studying the sensitivity of a small number of design parameters, say, less than 3, although this drawback appears unavoidable whenever multi-dimensional information is sought. Examples are presented to illustrate applications of the approach to reliability-based retrofit of structures.     

Robust seismic design optimization of steel structures

Stochastic performance measures can be taken into account, in structural optimization, using two distinct formulations: robust design optimization (RDO) and reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). According to a RDO formulation, it is desired to obtain solutions insensitive to the uncontrollable parameter variation. In the present study, the solution of a structural robust design problem formulated as a two-objective optimization problem is addressed, where cross-sectional dimensions, material properties and earthquake loading are considered as random variables. Additionally, a two-objective deterministic-based optimization (DBO) problem is also considered. In particular, the DBO and RDO formulations are employed for assessing the Greek national seismic design code for steel structural buildings with respect to the behavioral factor considered. The limit-state-dependent cost is used as a measure of assessment. The stochastic finite element problem is solved using the Monte Carlo Simulation method, while a modified NSGA-II algorithm is employed for solving the two-objective optimization problem.     

Reliability-based robust assessment for multiobjective optimization design of improving occupant restraint system performance

Optimal performance of vehicle occupant restraint system (ORS) requires an accurate assessment of occupant injury values including head, neck and chest responses, etc. To provide a feasible framework for incorporating occupant injury characteristics into the ORS design schemes, this paper presents a reliability-based robust approach for the development of the ORS. The uncertainties of design variables are addressed and the general formulations of reliable and robust design are given in the optimization process. The ORS optimization is a highly nonlinear and large scale problem. In order to save the computational cost, an optimal sampling strategy is applied to generate sample points at the stage of design of experiment (DOE). Further, to efficiently obtain a robust approximation, the support vector regression (SVR) is suggested to construct the surrogate model in the vehicle ORS design process. The multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MPSO) algorithm is used for obtaining the Pareto optimal set with emphasis on resolving conflicting requirements from some of the objectives and the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) method is applied to perform the reliability and robustness analysis. The differences of three different Pareto fronts of the deterministic, reliable and robust multiobjective optimization designs are compared and analyzed in this study. Finally, the reliability-based robust optimization result is verified by using sled system test. The result shows that the proposed reliability-based robust optimization design is efficient in solving ORS design optimization problems.     

Nonlinear topology optimization of layered shell structures

Topology stiffness (compliance) design of linear and geometrically nonlinear shell structures is solved using the SIMP approach together with a filtering scheme. A general anisotropic multi-layer shell model is employed to allow the formation of through-the-thickness holes or stiffening zones. The finite element analysis is performed using nine-node Mindlin-type shell elements based on the degenerated shell approach, which are capable of modeling both single and multi-layered structures exhibiting anisotropic or isotropic behavior. The optimization problem is solved using analytical compliance and constraint sensitivities together with the Method of Moving Asymptotes (MMA). Geometrically nonlinear problems are solved using iterative Newton–Raphson methods and an adjoint variable approach is used for the sensitivity analysis. Several benchmark tests are presented in order to illustrate the difference in optimal topologies between linear and geometrically nonlinear shell structures.     

Reliability-based design optimization applied to structures submitted to random fatigue loads

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization - The reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) aims to find the most balanced design through a compromise between cost and safety when...     

Improved hybrid method as a robust tool for reliability-based design optimization

In the engineering problems, the randomness and the uncertainties of the distribution of the structural parameters are a crucial problem. In the case of reliability-based design optimization (RBDO), it is the objective to play a dominant role in the structural optimization problem introducing the reliability concept. The RBDO problem is often formulated as a minimization of the initial structural cost under constraints imposed on the values of elemental reliability indices corresponding to various limit states. The classical RBDO leads to high computing time and weak convergence, but a Hybrid Method (HM) has been proposed to overcome these two drawbacks. As the hybrid method successfully reduces the computing time, we can increase the number of variables by introducing the standard deviations as optimization variables to minimize the error values in the probabilistic model. The efficiency of the hybrid method has been demonstrated on static and dynamic cases with extension to the variability of the probabilistic model. In this paper, we propose a modification on the formulation of the hybrid method to improve the optimal solutions. The proposed method is called, Improved Hybrid Method (IHM). The main benefit of this method is to improve the structure performance by much more minimizing the objective function than the hybrid method. It is also shown to demonstrate the optimality conditions. The improved hybrid method is next applied to two numerical examples, with consideration of the standard deviations as optimization variables (for linear and nonlinear distributions). When integrating the improved hybrid method within the probabilistic model variability, we minimize the objective function more and more.     

A direct decoupling approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization

This paper develops an efficient methodology to perform reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) by decoupling the optimization and reliability analysis iterations that are nested in traditional formulations. This is achieved by approximating the reliability constraints based on the reliability analysis results. The proposed approach does not use inverse first-order reliability analysis as other existing decoupled approaches, but uses direct reliability analysis. This strategy allows a modular approach and the use of more accurate methods, including Monte-Carlo-simulation (MCS)-based methods for highly nonlinear reliability constraints where first-order reliability approximation may not be accurate. The use of simulation-based methods also enables system-level reliability estimates to be included in the RBDO formulation. The efficiency of the proposed RBDO approach is further improved by identifying the potentially active reliability constraints at the beginning of each reliability analysis. A vehicle side impact problem is used to examine the proposed method, and the results show the usefulness of the proposed method.     

Inverse analysis method using MPP-based dimension reduction for reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear and multi-dimensional systems

There are two commonly used analytical reliability analysis methods: linear approximation - first-order reliability method (FORM), and quadratic approximation - second-order reliability method (SORM), of the performance function. The reliability analysis using FORM could be acceptable in accuracy for mildly nonlinear performance functions, whereas the reliability analysis using SORM may be necessary for accuracy of nonlinear and multi-dimensional performance functions. Even though the reliability analysis using SORM may be accurate, it is not as much used for probability of failure calculation since SORM requires the second-order sensitivities. Moreover, the SORM-based inverse reliability analysis is rather difficult to develop.This paper proposes an inverse reliability analysis method that can be used to obtain accurate probability of failure calculation without requiring the second-order sensitivities for reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) of nonlinear and multi-dimensional systems. For the inverse reliability analysis, the most probable point (MPP)-based dimension reduction method (DRM) is developed. Since the FORM-based reliability index (β) is inaccurate for the MPP search of the nonlinear performance function, a three-step computational procedure is proposed to improve accuracy of the inverse reliability analysis: probability of failure calculation using constraint shift, reliability index update, and MPP update. Using the three steps, a new DRM-based MPP is obtained, which estimates the probability of failure of the performance function more accurately than FORM and more efficiently than SORM. The DRM-based MPP is then used for the next design iteration of RBDO to obtain an accurate optimum design even for nonlinear and/or multi-dimensional system. Since the DRM-based RBDO requires more function evaluations, the enriched performance measure approach (PMA+) with new tolerances for constraint activeness and reduced rotation matrix is used to reduce the number of function evaluations.     

An investigation of structural optimization in crashworthiness design using a stochastic approach

In this paper the response surface methodology (RSM) and stochastic optimization (SO) are compared with regard to their efficiency and applicability in crashworthiness design. Optimization of simple analytic expressions and optimization of a front rail structure are the applications used to assess the respective qualities of both methods. A low detail vehicle structure is optimized to demonstrate the applicability of the methods in engineering practice. The investigations reveal that RSM is better compared to SO for fewer than 10–15 design variables. The convergence behaviour of SO improves compared to RSM when the number of design variables is increased. A novel zooming method is proposed which improves the convergence behaviour. A combination of both the RSM and the SO is efficient, stochastic optimization could be used in order to determine appropriate starting points for an RSM optimization, which continues the optimization. Two examples are investigated using this combined method.     

Compliant mechanism design using multi-objective topology optimization scheme of continuum structures

Topology optimization problems for compliant mechanisms using a density interpolation scheme, the rational approximation of material properties (RAMP) method, and a globally convergent version of the method of moving asymptotes (GCMMA) are primarily discussed. First, a new multi-objective formulation is proposed for topology optimization of compliant mechanisms, in which the maximization of mutual energy (flexibility) and the minimization of mean compliance (stiffness) are considered simultaneously. The formulation of one-node connected hinges, as well as checkerboards and mesh-dependency, is typically encountered in the design of compliant mechanisms. A new hybrid-filtering scheme is proposed to solve numerical instabilities, which can not only eliminate checkerboards and mesh-dependency efficiently, but also prevent one-node connected hinges from occurring in the resulting mechanisms to some extent. Several numerical applications are performed to demonstrate the validity of the methods presented in this paper.     

Reliability-based robust design optimization using the eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method

This paper presents an effective methodology for reliability-based robust design optimization (RBRDO). The eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method plays a pivotal role in making RBRDO effective because the EDR method turns out to be very efficient and accurate for probability analysis. The use of the EDR method provides three benefits to RBRDO. First, an approximate response surface facilitates sensitivity calculation of reliability and quality where the response surface is constructed using the eigenvector samples. Thus, sensitivity analysis becomes very efficient and simple. Second, one EDR execution evaluates a set of quality (objective) and reliability (constraint) functions. In general, the EDR requires 2N + 1 or 4N + 1 simulation runs where N is the total number of random variables. The EDR execution does not require an iterative process, so the proposed RBRDO methodology has a single-loop structure. Moreover, the EDR execution time can be much shorter by taking advantage of a parallel computing power, and RBRDO can be far more efficient. Third, the EDR method allows solving problems with statistically correlated and non-normally distributed random inputs. Three practical engineering problems are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed RBRDO method using the EDR method.