Hemothorax caused by replacement of hemodialysis catheter: A case report

Central venous catheters (CVC) are widely used in clinics to gain vascular access, but the risk and prevalence of catheter‐related complications remains a serious issue. We report a long‐term dialysis catheter accidentally inserted into the mediastinum via the right jugular vein in a hemodialysis patient. We also review complications associated with vascular catheterization and propose immediate therapeutic interventions for such cases.     

Hemodialysis catheter insertion using transrenal approach

We report a patient suffering from end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) because of lupus nephritis presented with exhausted vascular access after multiple arteriovenous grafts creation and hemodialysis catheters insertion. A rare percutaneous transrenal approach was finally used for the insertion of dialysis catheter. After 2 years, this hemodialysis catheter was complicated by blockage but was successfully replaced by a new catheter via the same site. Our report shows that the transrenal route of hemodialysis catheter insertion can provide a glimpse of hope for those ESRD patients with exhausted vascular access.     

Vascular access for chronic hemodialysis in a patient with epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica Hallopeau‐Siemens

Epidermolysis bullosa is a rare genetic hereditary disease characterized with mechanobullous dermatosis. Except cutaneous, these patients have various extracutaneous manifestations and some types of epidermolysis bullosa comprise almost all organ systems. Because of prolonged life span, chronic renal insufficiency has become an important cause of morbidity and death in these patients. Establishment of functional vascular dialysis access is a great challenge for both the doctors and the patients. Multidisciplinary approach is essential. We present a case of successful establishment of dialysis access via Tesio catheter in a young woman suffering from epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica Hallopeau‐Siemens and end‐stage renal disease. Since then, the Tesio catheter inserted via the right internal jugular vein has been the functional mean of dialysis. The patient was given the opportunity to lead a quality and active life in spite of disabling disease. Several cases of successful dialysis access establishment with dialysis catheters via central veins have been reported. We report the successful establishment of long‐term dialysis access via Tesio catheter and suggest this approach as ideal for these patients. This is the first report dealing with vascular access in this group of patients.     

Association between vascular access type and patient mortality among elderly patients on hemodialysis in Canada

Optimal vascular access in elderly patients requires consideration of the benefits and risks in a population with increased comorbidity and mortality. Our objective was to examine the association between vascular access type and patient mortality by age category among incident adult hemodialysis patients registered in the Canadian Organ Replacement Register between 2001 and 2010. We also describe the secular trend in incident and prevalent vascular access use. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the overall mortality in patients aged less than 65, 65–74, 75–85, and greater than 85 years who initiated hemodialysis using a central venous catheter (catheter) or arteriovenous (AV)‐access (fistula or graft) using an intention‐to‐treat approach. The cohort of 39,721 patients consisted of 42%, 27%, 26%, and 5% of patients aged <65, 65–74, 75–85, and >85, respectively. Patients who initiated hemodialysis using an AV‐access constituted 21%, 22%, 20%, and 15% of each age category. AV access use was associated with lower adjusted mortality compared with catheter use in each age category (Hazard Ratios [HR], 0.67; 95% Confidence Interval [0.62–0.72]; HR, 0.76 [0.63–0.91]; HR, 0.77 [0.64–0.93], HR, 0.73 [0.56–0.96], respectively). In Canada, use of an AV‐access is associated with lower mortality across all age categories, even in the very elderly. Further studies are required to understand the patient preference, complications, and resource use when selecting access type in the elderly.     

Approach to prophylactic measures for central venous catheter‐related infections in hemodialysis: A critical review

Vascular access is the major risk factor for bacteremia, hospitalization, and mortality among hemodialysis (HD) patients. The type of vascular access most associated with bloodstream infection is central venous catheter (CVC). The incidence of catheter‐related bacteremia ranges between 0.6 and 6.5 episodes per 1000 catheter days and increases linearly with the duration of catheter use. Given the high prevalence of CVC use and its direct association with catheter‐related bacteremia, which adversely impacts morbidity and mortality rates and costs among HD patients, several prevention measures aimed at reducing the rates of CVC‐related infections have been proposed and implemented. As a result, a large number of clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta‐analyses have been conducted in order to assess the effectiveness, clinical applicability, and long‐term adverse effects of such measures. In the following article, prophylactic measures against CVC‐related infections in HD patients and their possible advantages and limitations will be discussed, and the more recent literature on clinical experience with prophylactic antimicrobial lock therapy in HD CVCs will be reviewed.     

Effective interventions with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) to decrease hemodialysis (HD) tunneled catheter‐related infections

Purpose:  Identify practices to reduce HD catheter access related bacteremias (ARB). Methods:  Data was collected per the CDC Dialysis Surveillance Network protocol. ARB was defined as a patient with a positive blood culture with no apparent source other than the vascular access catheter. ARB's were calculated in events per 100 patient months with 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 was observed for 12 months, Cohort 2 for the subsequent 10 months, and Cohort 3 for the final 10 months. Cohort 1 had weekly transparent dressing changes, cleansing of the skin and 5 minute soaking of the connection lines with 10% povidone‐iodine (PI) solution, and HCW use of clean gloves and face shield without a mask. Cohort 2 changes consisted of thrice weekly gauze dressing changes, skin cleansing with ChloraPrep, a 2% CHG/70% isopropyl alcohol applicator, masks on the patients, adding a face mask to the shield, and application of 10% PI ointment to the exit site. Cohort 3 changes included weekly application of BioPatch (BioP), an antimicrobial dressing with CHG, sterile glove use, and replacing the PI line soaks with 4% CHG. Results:  The catheter‐associated ARB rate per 100 patient months was 7.9 (17ARB/216 patient months) in Cohort 1 , 8.6 (13/151) in Cohort 2 , and 4.7 (5/107) in Cohort 3 (p = 0.31 compared with Cohorts 1 and 2 combined). During the last 2 months, in Cohort 3 , 9 catheter lumen cracks occurred, with one of the patients having a bacteremia. Conclusions:  Addition of CHG line soaks and BioP reduced tunneled catheter infections, although this is not statistically significant. The increased number of catheter lumen cracks raises concern with the use of CHG line soaks. Further investigation with use of CHG line soaks and the BioP for decreasing ARB is needed.     

Lethal cardiac arrhythmia during central venous catheterization in a uremic patient: A case report and review of the literature

Double‐lumen central venous catheter (CVC) is a rapid access technique for hemodialysis (HD) when an arteriovenous fistula or graft is not available. A variety of procedure‐related complications have been reported, such as infection and pneumothorax, but serious cardiac complications are relatively less mentioned. We report a uremic woman with preexisting left bundle branch block who required emergent HD and received jugular double‐lumen CVC insertion, which was complicated by short‐duration ventricular tachycardia followed by complete atrio‐ventricular block and bradycardia. Pharmacological management did not reverse heart rate and rhythm. External pacing was not applied because she remained hemodynamically stable in the course of HD. Heart rate returned to sinus rhythm with left bundle branch block 4 hours later and did not recur through the whole admission period. We speculate that the transient arrhythmia might have been induced by mechanical contact with the ventricular wall during the procedure with the guided metallic wire. In conclusion, physicians responsible for CVC catheterization should pay more attention to patients with preexisting cardiac arrhythmia to prevent such technical mistakes from transpiring.     

The use of vascular access audit and infections in home hemodialysis

Vascular access‐related infection is an important adverse event in home hemodialysis (HHD). We hypothesize that errors in self‐cannulation or manipulation of dialysis vascular access are associated with increased incidence of access‐related infection. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all prevalent HHD patients at the University Health Network. All vascular access‐related infections were recorded from 2006 to 2013. Errors in dialysis access were ascertained by nurse‐administered vascular access checklist. Ninety‐two patients had completed at least one vascular access audit. Median HHD vintage was 2.3 (0.9–5.0) years in patients with appropriate vascular access technique and 5.8 (1.5–9.4) years in patients with erroneous vascular access technique. The overall rate of infection between patients with and without appropriate vascular access technique was similar (0.27 and 0.28 infections per year, P = 0.166). Among patients who were identified with errors in dialysis access manipulation, patients with five or more errors were associated with higher rate of access‐related infection (mean of 0.47 vs. 0.16 infection per patient‐year, P < 0.001). The use of vascular access audit is a feasible strategy, which can identify errors in vascular access technique. Patients with a longer median HHD vintage are associated with higher risk of inappropriate vascular access technique. Patients with multiple errors in vascular access technique are associated with a higher risk of dialysis access‐related infection. Prospective evaluation of the impact of vascular access audit on adverse vascular access events is warranted.     

Black hole on film following catheter insertion

Vascular accesses both permanent and temporary play an essential role in the procedure of hemodialysis (HD). The double lumen catheter (DLC) is one form of temporal vascular access which may produce different complications based on where the DLC is inserted. Here, we report a case of a cirrhotic patient receiving HD. The DLC was inserted through the left femoral vein. Later on, an unusual catheter position, mimicking a perforation in the iliac vessel, was noted in the incidental image finding. After venography, we concluded that this DLC had entered the dilated left gonadal vein, and was working well. This condition may be explained by portal hypertension leading to increased frequency of collateral branches and easy dilatation of the left gonadal vein. This condition may develop in a cirrhotic patient with portal hypertension, but there is no harm to a patient. However, this condition leads to an interesting computed tomography image, which may result in misinterpretation of the imaging reports and a clinical misdiagnosis.     

Relation between Access-Related Infection and Preinfection Serum Albumin Concentration in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis

Background: Hemodialysis (HD) access‐related infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in HD patients. We tested whether hypoalbuminemia is a risk factor for HD access infection and whether mortality of HD catheter infection is affected by removal of the infected catheter. Methods: We analyzed the records of 87 patients on chronic HD who were hospitalized for HD access‐related infection. We obtained data on age, sex, preinfection serum albumin level, comorbidities, complications, infecting organism, type of infection, mode of management, and mortality. We compared preinfection serum albumin levels in 79 patients with HD access infection with the serum albumin levels of 198 control patients on chronic HD without HD access infection admitted to the hospital during the same time for other reasons. In the HD catheter infection subgroup, we compared mortalities between patients treated with catheter removal plus antibiotics as the primary mode of management and those treated initially with antibiotics alone. Results: Preadmission serum albumin level was lower in the HD access infection group (2.4 ± 0.6 g/dL) than in the control group (3.2 ± 0.6 g/dL, P < 0.0001). Logistic regression identified preadmission serum albumin level as a strong independent predictor of HD access infection. In a logistic regression model, with age, sex, HIV status, diabetes, and type of HD vascular access (excluding arterovenous fistula) as the covariates, the odds ratio of HD access infection was 9.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9–19.7) for a serum albumin level ≤ 3.0 g/dL (P < 0.0001), 10.4 (95% CI 4.97–21.6) for a serum albumin level ≤ 2.5 g/dL (P < 0.0001), and 28.0 (95% CI 5.8–135.9) for a serum albumin level ≤ 2.0 g/dL (P < 0.0001). Case mortality was 25.0% (4/16) in patients with tunneled HD catheter infection initially treated with antibiotics alone and 2.8% (2/71) in those treated with catheter removal plus antibiotics at the time of presentation (P = 0.0096). Conclusion: Hypoalbuminemia is associated with increased risk of HD access infection. Treatment of HD access infection with antibiotics alone is associated with increased risk of death.     

Esophageal perforation during cuffed tunneled catheter introduction: First case in literature

The percutaneous catheterization of central veins is increasingly used in nephrological practice as a temporary or permanent vascular access. Some mechanical complications may occur during insertion of catheter such as misplaced catheter. In this report, we present a case that was misplaced the catheter in esophagus and to analyze the reason of catheter malposition during percutaneous tunneled hemodialysis catheter insertion.     

Vascular access‐related infection in nocturnal home hemodialysis

Frequent hemodialysis is associated with increased vascular access adverse events. We hypothesized that bacteremia would be more frequent in patients with central venous catheter (CVC) than arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft (AVF/AVG) in nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHHD). We reviewed blood culture reports and concurrent clinical data for a cohort of one hundred eighty‐seven NHHD patients between January 1, 2006 and June 30, 2012. The primary outcome was time to first bacteremia, technique failure, or death after commencing NHHD. Types of bacteremia and clinical consequences were analyzed. Analyses were adjusted for a priori defined confounders. One hundred eighty‐seven patients were included with a total follow up of six hundred five patient years. Initial vascular access was AVF in seventy‐eight (42%) patients, AVG in eleven (6%) patients, and CVC in ninety‐eight (52%) patients. A total of 79.3% of patients with a CVC reached the composite endpoint of bacteremia, technique failure, or death in the study period; 44.5% of patients with an AVF or AVG reached this composite endpoint. Adjusted time to first bacteremia, technique failure, or death was significantly shorter in patients with initial CVC access (hazard ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.50–3.90, p < 0.001). Risk factors for bacteremia were comorbid status quantified by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.001) and diabetes (p < 0.001). Coagulase negative staphylococcus was the commonest organism cultured accounting for 51.4% bacteremias. The second commonest organism was staphylococcus aureus (20.3% bacteremias). Patients undergoing NHHD with a CVC have a shorter duration to first infection, technique failure, or death than those with permanent vascular access.     

A complication of double lumen hemocatheter guide wire entrapment in a hemodialysis patient

Double lumen hemocatheter is commonly used for temporary hemodialysis patient and various complications have been documented but few reports of guide wire‐related complications. We report a complication of double lumen hemocatheter guide wire entrapment in a 43‐year‐old female of type 1 diabetes mellitus and hemodialysis patient. She was admitted for left arteriovenous shunt dysfunction and right internal jugular vein hemocatheter chamber clotting was found while on hemodialysis, so a new hemocatheter was changed over guide wire. Guide wire was introduced without any resistance and the clotting hemocatheter was removed. During the procedure, the J‐tipped guide wire could not be withdrawn and portable chest radiography revealed the J‐tip of the guide wire was in the right ventricle near the region of tricuspid valve. Fluoroscopy was arranged and it also confirmed the J‐tip was lying in the ventricle near the tricuspid valve where it was stuck. Snare catheter kit was inserted through the 10 Fr sheath and the cardiologist untied the knot by endovascular snare and removed the guide wire smoothly. This report emphasizes the importance of awareness on guide wire entrapment while inserting double lumen hemocatheter. When a guide wire became hard to withdraw, extracting an entrapped guide wire with fluoroscopy guide and snare catheter is a preferable and minimal invasive approach.     

Hemodialysis access at initiation in the United States, 2005 to 2007: Still "Catheter First"

Despite the broad consensus that native arteriovenous fistula is the access of choice for hemodialysis, national-level information about vascular access at dialysis initiation has been unavailable in the United States. For incident hemodialysis patients, June 2005 to October 2007 (n=220,157), vascular access type was determined from the new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medical Evidence Report (form CMS-2728). Proportions with each type at first dialysis, demographic and clinical associations of each type, and associations between initial access type and survival were assessed. The mean patient age was 63.6 years; 29.4% of patients were African American, and for 44.5%, end-stage renal disease was due to diabetes. Vascular access proportions were: fistula, 13.2% of patients; graft, 4.3%; catheter/maturing fistula, 16.0%; catheter/maturing graft, 3.3%; and catheter alone, 63.2%. Adjusted odds ratios (vs. fistula) of catheter use alone were ≥1.50 for lack of insurance (1.62 [95% confidence interval 1.62–1.68]), nephrologist care for 0 to 12 months (2.75 [2.69–2.81]), other (2.19 [2.09–2.29]), or unknown (1.53 [1.44–1.63]) cause of renal disease, institutional residence (1.51 [1.45–1.57]), and 7 of 18 end-stage renal disease networks. Over a mean follow-up of 1 year, 26.0% of the study population died. Compared with fistula, adjusted mortality hazards ratios were 1.39 (1.32–1.47) for grafts, 1.49 (1.44–1.55) for catheters/maturing fistulas, 1.74 (1.65–1.84) for catheters/maturing grafts, and 2.18 (2.11–2.26) for catheters alone. While geographic variability is pronounced, vascular access at dialysis inception is typically suboptimal; suboptimal access exhibits a graded association with mortality. Lack of timely access to specialty care appears to limit optimal access.     

Disparities in arteriovenous fistula placement in older hemodialysis patients

The benefits of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis have been clearly demonstrated. However, only about 20% of patients in the United States initiate hemodialysis with an AVF. In this study, we assessed whether disparities exist in the type of first hemodialysis access placed prior to dialysis start (rather than that used at dialysis initiation), to detect whether certain disadvantaged groups might have lower likelihood of AVF placement. Study cohort of 118,767 incident hemodialysis patients ≥67 years of age (1/2005–12/2008) derived from the United States Renal Data System was linked with Medicare claims data to identify the type of initial access placed predialysis. We used logistic regression model with outcome being the initial predialysis placement of an AVF as opposed to an arteriovenous graft or a central venous catheter. Increasing age, female sex, black race, lower body mass index, urban location, certain comorbidities, and shorter pre–end‐stage renal disease nephrology care are all associated with a significantly lower likelihood of AVF placement as initial access predialysis. Our study suggests the presence of significant disparities in the placement of an AVF as initial hemodialysis vascular access. We suggest that additional attention should be paid to these patient groups to improve disparities by patient education, earlier referral, and close follow‐up.     

Arteriovenous fistula for the 80 years and older patients on hemodialysis: Is it worth it?

Over the last years, the proportion of patients older than 80 years with end‐stage renal disease has been constantly growing. Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is known as the best vascular access for hemodialysis, but evidence for its added value is lacking for elderly. We retrospectively identified new vascular access (AVF and central venous catheter) created or installed between June 2005 and June 2008 in patients 80 years and older and in patients between 50 and 60 years. For every new AVF, we calculated primary failure, primary and secondary patency durations. Fifty‐five and 57 patients had a new vascular access in the >80 years old and 50 to 60 years old groups. Among these, 25 and 41 were new AVF in the older and younger groups. Primary failure was more frequent in elderly than in the younger (40% vs. 17%, P = 0.04). Primary patency was not significantly different in both groups (P = 0.06). Secondary patency was shorter in elderly (P = 0.005). Among the older group, the presence of an AVF was not associated with a difference in mortality (46% vs. 60%, P = 0.28), whereas there was a lower mortality in the younger group with AVF (12% vs. 43% P = 0.008). These results indicate lower patency duration in very elderly patients compared to middle‐aged patients. Without leading to the exclusion of patients over 80 years old for AVF creation, it might reinforce the need of a careful selection and evaluation in this population prior to referral.     

A rare cause of abdominal pain: Catheter in the middle hepatic vein

Hemodialysis catheters are vital for chronic renal failure patients. Permanent tunneled dialysis catheters may be inserted through the jugular, subclavian, and femoral veins. In this paper, we aimed to present the computed tomography findings of a chronic renal failure patient who had referred our clinic with abdominal pain and dyspnea symptoms. This patient had a formerly inserted hemodialysis catheter for chronic renal failure and her catheter was found to be extending towards the middle hepatic vein with the tip leaning onto the parenchyma. Hemodialysis catheters can provide instant vascular access and can also be used for the consecutive procedures. Permanent hemodialysis catheters are ideal for long‐term use when placing an arteriovenous fistula is contraindicated or is no longer possible under conditions like advanced heart failure, peripheral artery disease or short life expectancy. The internal jugular, subclavian, the femoral veins, and the inferior vena cava can be used for catheter insertion. The tip of the catheters inserted in the neck or the thorax must extend to the vena cava superior. Catheter malposition may both lead to fatal outcomes and ineffective dialysis. It is important to obtain chest X‐rays after the procedure, particularly to detect catheter malposition.     

Comparison of alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator) high‐dose vs. low‐dose protocol in restoring hemodialysis catheter function: The ALTE‐DOSE study

Hemodialysis catheter (HDC) dysfunction due to thrombosis is common, and dysfunction incidence can reach up to 50% within 1 year of use. Although administration of intraluminal alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]) is the standard of practice to pharmacologically restore HDC function, there are no evidence‐based guidelines concerning the optimal tPA dose. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 1.0‐mg vs. 2.0‐mg tPA dwell protocols in restoring the HDC function in thrombotic dysfunctional catheters. A retrospective, single‐center study was conducted on two independent cohorts of patients; the first (n = 129) received 2.0 mg tPA/catheter lumen, while the second (n = 108) received 1.0 mg tPA/catheter lumen. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to compare the catheter survival time between patients who received 1.0 mg tPA and those who received 2.0 mg tPA. Catheter removal occurred in 25 (19.4%) of those catheters treated with 1.0 mg tPA compared with 11 (10.2%) of catheters treated with 2.0 mg tPA (P = 0.05). The hazard ratio (HR) for catheter removal was 2.75 (95% confidence interval [^95%CI] = 1.25–6.04) for the 1.0‐mg tPA cohort compared with the 2.0‐mg tPA cohort. Correction added on 3 December 2012, after first online publication: The tPA cohort values were changed. Female gender (HR = 2.51; ^95%CI = 1.20–5.27) and age (HR = 0.96; ^95%CI = 0.94–0.98) were also associated with catheter survival. Our findings suggest that treatment of dysfunctional HDC with 2.0‐mg tPA dwells is superior to 1.0‐mg tPA dwells.     

Hemodialysis access-related survival and morbidity in an elderly population in South West Thames, UK

Elderly patients form the most rapidly expanding group of hemodialysis (HD) patients in Europe and the United States. There are initiatives to promote an increase in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) formation. There are concerns that elderly patients may have lower rates of surgical vascular access compared with younger patients due to risks of higher co-morbidities, surgical complications, and higher AVF nonuse rates. The aim of this study was to compare access-related survival and morbidity for dialysis catheters and AVFs and to evaluate the AVF nonuse rate in an elderly population. We have performed a retrospective analysis of access survival and morbidity in patients > or = 70 years of age, either on maintenance HD or predialysis with preemptive formation of surgical access. One hundred and forty-six patients had permanent HD access created during the 18-month study period, from 1 January 2006 to June 2007. There were 89 male and 57 female patients in whom 78 AVFs and 137 tunneled venous catheters were inserted. There was a significantly greater loss of vascular access due to infection in the catheter group compared with the AVF group (P<0.016). Access survival was also significantly prolonged in the AVF group (446 days, 95% confidence interval 405-487) compared with the catheter group (276 days, 95% confidence interval 240-313), P=0.001. The rate of nonuse of AVFs was low (16%). We conclude that an AVF is the preferred form of vascular access in elderly HD patients.     

Long‐term effects of daily hemodialysis on vascular access outcomes: A prospective controlled study

Daily hemodialysis has been associated with surrogate markers of improved survival among hemodialysis patients. A potential disadvantage of daily hemodialysis is that frequent vascular access cannulations may affect long‐term vascular access patency. The study design was a 4‐year, nonrandomized, contemporary control, prospective study of 77 subjects in either 3‐h daily hemodialysis (six 3‐h dialysis treatments weekly; n = 26) or conventional dialysis (three 4‐h dialysis treatments weekly; n = 51). Outcomes of interest were vascular access procedures (fistulagram, thrombectomy and access revision). Total access procedures (fistulagram, thrombectomy and access revision) were 543.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 432.9, 673.0) per 1000 person‐years in the conventional dialysis group vs. 400.8 (95% CI: 270.2, 572.4) per 1000 person‐years in the daily hemodialysis dialysis group (incidence rate ratio = 0.74 with 95% CI: from 0.40 to 1.36, P = 0.33), after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes status, serum phosphorus, hemoglobin level and erythropoietin dose, there was no significant differences in incidence rate of total access procedures (P‐value > 0.05). There was no difference in time to first access revision between the daily dialysis and the conventional dialysis groups after adjustment for covariates (hazard ratio = 0.99 95% CI: 0.42, 2.36, P = 0.96). Daily hemodialysis is not associated with increased vascular access complications, or increased vascular access failure rates.