Miscibility and properties of completely biodegradable blends of poly(propylene carbonate) and poly(butylene succinate)

Completely biodegradable blends of poly (propylene carbonate) (PPC) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) were melt‐prepared and then compression‐molded. The miscibilities of the two aliphatic polyesters, that is, PPC and PBS, were investigated by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The static mechanical properties, thermal behaviors, crystalline behavior, and melt flowability of the blends were also studied. Static tensile tests showed that the yield strength and the strength at break increased remarkably up to 30.7 and 46.3 MPa, respectively, with the incorporation of PBS. The good ductility of the blends was maintained in view of the large elongation at break. SEM observation revealed a two‐phase structure with good interfacial adhesion. The immiscibility of the two components was verified by the two independent glass‐transition temperatures obtained from DMA tests. Moreover, thermogravimetric measurements indicated that the thermal decomposition temperatures (T_?5% and T_?10%) of the PPC/PBS blends increased dramatically by 30–60°C when compared with PPC matrix. The melt flow indices of the blends showed that the introduction of PBS improved the melt flowability of the blends. The blending of PPC with PBS provided a practical way to develop completely biodegradable blends with applicable comprehensive properties. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Synthesis and characterization of poly[(butylene succinate)‐co‐(butylene terephthalate)]‐b‐poly(tetramethylene glycol) segmented block copolymer

Polyester‐polyether segmented block copolymers of poly[(butylene succinate)‐co‐poly(butylene terephthalate)] (PBS–PBT) and poly(tetramethylene glycol) (PTMG) (M_n = 2000) with various compositions were synthesized. PBT content in the PBS was adjusted to ca. 5 mol %. Their thermal and mechanical properties were investigated. In the case of copolymer, the melting point of the PBS–PBT control was 107.8°C, and the melting point of the copolymer containing 70 wt % of PTMG was 70.1°C. Crystallinity of soft segment was 5 ∼ 17%, and that of hard segment was 42 ∼ 59%. The breaking stress of the PBS–PTMG control was 47 MPa but it decreased with increasing PTMG content. In the case of copolymer containing 70 wt % of PTMG, breaking stress was 36 MPa. Contrary to the decreasing breaking stress, breaking strain increased from 300% for PBS–PBT control to 900% for a copolymer containing 70 wt % of PTMG. The shape recovery ratios of the copolymer containing 70 wt % PTMG were almost twice of those of copolymers containing 40 wt % PTMG. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2067–2075, 2001     

Properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized poly(butylene terephthalate)–LLDPE blends

In this work, blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) were prepared. LLDPE was used as an impact modifier. Since the system was found to be incompatible, compatibilization was sought for by the addition of the following two types of functionalized polyethylene: ethylene vinylacetate copolymer (EVA) and maleic anhydride‐grafted EVA copolymer (EVA‐g‐MAH). The effects of the compatibilizers on the rheological and mechanical properties of the blends have been also quantitatively investigated. The impact strength of the PBT–LLDPE binary blends slightly increased at a lower concentration of LLDPE but increased remarkably above a concentration of 60 wt % of LLDPE. The morphology of the blends showed that the LLDPE particles had dispersed in the PBT matrix below 40 wt % of LLDPE, while, at 60 wt % of LLDPE, a co‐continuous morphology was obtained, which could explain the increase of the impact strength of the blend. Generally, the mechanical strength was decreased by adding LLDPE to PBT. Addition of EVA or EVA‐g‐MAH as a compatibilizer to PBT–LLDPE (70/30) blend considerably improved the impact strength of the blend without significantly sacrificing the tensile and the flexural strength. More improvement in those mechanical properties was observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH system than for the EVA system. A larger viscosity increase was also observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH than EVA. This may be due to interaction of the EVA‐g‐MAH with PBT. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 989–997, 1999     

Crystallization behaviour of cellulose acetate butylate/poly(butylene succinate)‐co‐(butylene carbonate) blends

The kinetics of the isothermal crystallization process from the melt of pure poly(butylene succinate)‐co‐(butylene carbonate) (PBS‐co‐BC) and its blends with cellulose acetate butylate (CAB) (10–30 wt%) was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and the well‐known Avrami equation. In the blends, the overall crystallization rate of PBS‐co‐BC became slower with increasing CAB content. The equilibrium melting temperature ( ) of PBS‐co‐BC decreased with increasing CAB content, which was similar to that with other miscible crystalline/amorphous polymer blends. The slower crystallization kinetics of PBS‐co‐BC in the blends was explicable in terms of a diluent effect of the CAB component. By application of Turnbull–Fisher kinetic theory for polymer–diluent blend systems, the surface free energy (σ_e) of pure PBS‐co‐BC and of the blends was obtained, indicating that the blend with CAB resulted in a decrease in the surface free energy of folding of PBS‐co‐BC lamellar crystals. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

The vibration welding of poly(butylene terephthalate) and a polycarbonate/poly(butylene terephthalate) blend to each other and to other resins and blends

Vibration welding is used to assess the weldability of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and a polycarbonate/poly(butylene terephthalate) blend (PC/PBT) to each other and to other resins and blends: PBT to PC/PBT, PBT to modified poly(phenylene oxide) (M-PPO), PBT to polyetherimide (PEI) and PEI to a 65 wt% mineral-filled polyester blend (65-PF-PEB), PBT to a poly(phenylene oxide)/polyamide blend (PPO/PA), PC/PBT to M-PPO, and PC/PBT to PPO/PA. Based on the tensile strength of the weaker of the two materials in each pair, the following relative weld strengths have been demonstrated: PBT to PC/PBT,98%; PBT to PEI, 95%; 65-PF-PEB to PEI, 92%; and PC/PBT to M-PPO, 73%. PBT neither welds to M-PPO nor to PPO/PA, and PC/PBT does not weld to PPO/PA.     

Ternary blends of acrylic rubber,poly(butylene terephthalate), and liquid crystalline polymer: Influence of interactions on thermal and dynamic mechanical properties

The ternary blends of acrylate rubber (ACM), poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), and liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) were prepared by varying the amount of LCP but fixing the ratio of ACM and PBT, using melt mixing procedure. The influence of interactions on thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of the blends was investigated over the complete composition range. The techniques applied were Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TG), and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The FTIR spectroscopy analysis showed reduction in the intensity of the peak corresponding to epoxy groups of ACM with increasing heating time at 290°C. This implies that there is a chemical reaction between the epoxy and end groups of PBT and LCP. Glass transition temperature (T_g) and melting temperature (T_m) of the blends were affected depending on the LCP weight percent in the ACM/PBT blend, respectively. This further suggests the strong interfacial interactions between the blend components. In presence of ACM, the nucleating effect of LCP was more pronounced for the PBT phase. The thermogravimetric study showed improved thermal stability for the blends with the increasing LCP content. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 3904–3912, 2006     

Phase behavior and mechanical properties of blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) and poly(amino–ether) resin

The structure, thermal and mechanical properties of blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and a poly(amino–ether) (PAE) barrier resin obtained by direct injection molding are reported. The slight shift of the glass transition temperatures (T_g) of the pure components when blended is attributed to partial miscibility rather than interchange reactions. Both the small strain and the break properties of the blends were close or even above those predicted by the direct rule of mixtures. The specific volume of the blends appeared to be the main reason for the modulus behavior. The linear values of the elongation at break indicated that the blends were compatible, and were attributed to a combination of good adhesion between the two phases of the blends and the small size of the dispersed phases. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 132–139, 2004     

Influences of ethylene–butylacrylate–glycidyl methacrylate on morphology and mechanical properties of poly(butylene terephthalate)/polyolefin elastomer blends

Elastomer ethylene–butylacrylate–glycidyl methacrylate (PTW) containing epoxy groups were chosen as toughening modifier for poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/polyolefin elastomer (POE) blend. The morphology, thermal, and mechanical properties of the PBT/POE/PTW blend were studied. The infrared spectra of the blends proved that small parts of epoxy groups of PTW reacted with carboxylic acid or hydroxyl groups in PBT during melt blending, resulting in a grafted structure which tended to increase the viscosity and interfere with the crystallization process of the blend. The morphology observed by scanning electron microscopy revealed the dispersed POE particles were well distributed and the interaction between POE and PBT increased in the PBT/POE/PTW blends. Mechanical properties showed the addition of PTW could lead to a remarkable increase about 10‐times in impact strength with a small reduction in tensile strength of PBT/POE blends. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed with increasing PTW, the crystallization temperature (T_c) and crystallinity (X_c) decreased while the melting point (T_m) slightly increased. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis spectra indicated that the presence of PTW could improve the compatibility of PBT/POE blends. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40660.     

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(butylene terephthalate)

Commercial grade poly(ethylene terephthalate), (PET, intrinsic viscosity = 0.80 dL/g) and poly(butylene terephthalate), (PBT, intrinsic viscosity = 1.00 dL/g) were melt blended over the entire composition range using a counterrotating twin‐screw extruder. The mechanical, thermal, electrical, and rheological properties of the blends were studied. All of the blends showed higher impact properties than that of PET or PBT. The 50:50 blend composition exhibited the highest impact value. Other mechanical properties also showed similar trends for blends of this composition. The addition of PBT increased the processability of PET. Differential scanning calorimetry data showed the presence of both phases. For all blends, only a single glass‐transition temperature was observed. The melting characteristics of one phase were influenced by the presence of the other. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 75–82, 2005     

Studies of polycarbonate — poly (butylene terephthalate) blends

The composition and microstructure of a blend of bisphenol-A polycarbonate (PC) and poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT) have been established by a variety of physical methods. The composition was established by solvent extraction and infra-red spectrophotometry, while the microstructure was determined by these and the additional methods of differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. The PBT retained its crystallinity in the commercial blend, (Xenoy CL-100), but blending reduced the main glass-rubber transition of the PC from 147°C to approximately 100°C. Conditioning of the blend at high temperatures resulted in progressive transesterification: 3 minutes at 240°C gave a small but significant effect, while 30 minutes at 270°C yielded large changes in the structure. These findings are important in respect of processing the material, and the limitations which might be incurred in plant recycling of scrap.     

Improved thermal and mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate) by polymer blending with a thermotropic liquid crystalline polyester

A novel polymer blending system consisting of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and a thermotropic liquid crystalline polyester [LCP: a poly(4‐hydroxybenzoate)‐based polymer] was investigated in the presence and absence of a polycarbodiimide (PCD) and/or 1,1′‐carbonyl biscaprolactam (CBC) as chain extenders. Although the LCP was immiscible with PBS, it formed elongated fibrous domains having an orientation in the flowing direction when an extensional flow was applied during the processing. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the injection‐molded polymer blends supported the distribution of micro fibrils of LCP in the PBS matrix by which the efficient toughening was provided. These blend specimens showed highly improved mechanical properties along with retaining high dynamic storage‐moduli (E′) up to the melting temperature of PBS. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 39952.     

Study of the effect of processing conditions on the co‐injection of PBS/PBAT and PTT/PBT blends for parts with increased bio‐content

This work studies the effect of processing parameters on mechanical properties and material distribution of co‐injected polymer blends within a complex mold shape. A partially bio‐sourced blend of poly(butylene terephthalate) and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) PTT/PBT was used for the core, with a tough biodegradable blend of poly (butylene succinate) and poly (butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) PBS/PBAT for the skin. A ½ factorial design of experiments is used to identify significant processing parameters from skin and core melt temperatures, injection speed and pressure, and mold temperature. Interactions between the processing effects are considered, and the resulting statistical data produced accurate linear models indicating that the co‐injection of the two blends can be controlled. Impact strength of the normally brittle PTT/PBT blend is shown to increase significantly with co‐injection and variations in core to skin volume ratios to have a determining role in the overall impact strength. Scanning electron microscope images were taken of co‐injected tensile samples with the PBS/PBAT skin dissolved displaying variations of mechanical interlocking occurring between the two blends. © 2014 The Authors Journal of Applied Polymer Science Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41278.     

Miscible blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) and the polyhydroxyether of bisphenol A

Melt blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and the polyhydroxyether of bisphenol A (phenoxy) exhibit excellent transparency above the melting point of PBT as well as for the quenched molded specimens. Dynamic mechanical and calorimetric characterization revealed single and sharp glass transitions intermediate between those for the individual constituents. Increasing phenoxy content in the blends depressed the crystallization rate of PBT due to dilution and viscosity (T_g increase) effects. The apparent miscibility is believed due to the potential specific interactions between phenoxy pendant hydroxyl (proton donor) and the ester carbonyl of PBT (proton acceptor). Heat of fusion results surprisingly show an increase in the degree of PBT crystallinity as the phenoxy content of the blend is increased. No explanation is offered at this point for this unexpected behavior.     

Toughening of poly(butylene terephthalate) by AES terpolymer

AES, a terpolymer of acrylonitrile-EPDM(ethylene/propylene/diene elastomer)-styrene, was blended in poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). Uniaxial tensile tests were carried out at various strain rates on blends containing 0-50 wt% of AES in order to study the yielding behavior of PBT in these blends by the Eyring equation. It was found that stress concentration factor (γ) increases sharply when a small content of AES is incorporated in the PBT matrix, but further incorporation seems to have small effect and γ levels out, a behavior that can be explained by the blend morphology and AES mechanical characteristics. The effect of AES content on the notched Izod impact strength of PBT blends was also examined in depth. It was found that a supertough blend can be achieved with at least 30 wt% of AES in PBT in appropriate molding temperature. Macroscopic and microscopic observations indicate that dilatational process play an important role on the toughening mechanism in PBT/AES blends at notched Izod impact tests.     

Partially Bio-Based Polyester Bead Foams via Extrusion Foaming of Poly(butylene terephthalate)/Poly(butylene furanoate) Blends

The interest in bio-based alternatives to classical polyesters such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) is steadily growing to achieve a more sustainable approach to polymer materials. In this study, PBT/poly(butylene furanoate) (PBF) blends are prepared, characterized and extrusion foamed. PBF as a bio-based polyester offers two advantages. The ecological footprint of the material is reduced, and additionally, it can be used in Diels-Alder reactions at the blend surface to support fusion of the foamed beads. The blending behavior of the polyesters is investigated using samples prepared in a microcompounder, particularly focused on the miscibility of the blends and transesterification reactions. The blends are thermodynamically immiscible but show a certain degree of transesterification according to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The morphology of blend beads produced by an extrusion foaming process is analyzed regarding their cell density, cell size distribution, and open-cell content. It is shown that PBF has a positive effect on the bead foam morphology. The use of a bifunctional linker designed for chemical fusion of the bead surfaces allows to obtaining of molded parts, in contrast to beads containing pure PBT.     

Reactive compatibilization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/low‐density polyethylene and poly(butylene terephthalate)/ethylene propylene diene rubber blends with a bismaleimide

The reactive compatibilization effect of a small molecule, bismaleimide (BMI), on poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and PBT/ethylene propylene diene (EPDM) rubber blends were investigated. All the blends were prepared by melt blending in the mixing chamber of a Haake Rheocord. The particle size of dispersed phase was reduced by >ten times by adding 1.2 wt % of BMI as observed with scanning electron microscopy. The torque‐time curve recorded during mixing showed that the addition of BMI leads to a significant increase in the viscosity of PBT, LDPE, EPDM, and the blends. This indicates that a chemical reaction has taken place. It was confirmed that free radicals are involved in the reactions because the addition of a stabilizer to the blends has removed all the compatibilizing effect, and the torque‐time curve does not show any increase in viscosity. A possible mechanism of compatibilization is proposed. The shear forces during melt mixing cause the rupture of chemical bond in the polymers, which form macroradicals of PBT, LDPE, or EPDM. These macroradicals react with BMI to form PBT‐BMI‐LDPE or PBT‐BMI‐EPDM copolymers. These in situ‐formed copolymers act as compatibilizers to give a significant refinement of the blend morphology. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 2049–2057, 1999     

Toughening of poly(butylene terephthalate) by polyacrylic impact modifier

Core–shell structured polyacrylic (named ACR) impact modifiers consisting of a rubbery poly(n-butyl acrylate) (BA) core and a rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) shell with a size of about 310 nm were prepared by seed emulsion polymerization. The ACR modifiers with different core–shell weight ratios (85:15; 80:20; 75:25; 70:30) were used to modify the toughness of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) by melt blending. It was found that the polymerization had a very high instantaneous conversion (>90 %) and overall conversion (98 %). The ACR latexes had an obvious core–shell structure confirmed by transmission electron microscope. The mechanical properties of the PBT/ACR blends were evaluated, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the fractured morphology. Dynamic mechanical analysis and differential scanning calorimeter were used to study the molecular movement and crystallization behaviors of PBT/ACR blends. The results indicated that with an appropriate value of the core–shell weight ratio, poly(BA) could disperse well in the matrix and the brittle–ductile transition point could emerge. As a result, the notch impact strength of PBT/ACR blends with a core–shell weight ratio of 80:20 was 6.7 times greater than that of pure PBT, and the mechanical properties agreed well with the SEM observation.     

Study of the rheological properties of melts of polypropylene and poly(butylene terephthalate) blends

The viscosity properties of melts of fibre-forming polypropylene (PP) and poly(butylene terephthalate) blends were investigated in the entire range of ratios at different stresses and shear rate gradients at 230–250°C. It was shown that melts of fibre-forming PP and PBT blends are weakly crosslinked systems. The effect of the mass ratio of PP and PBT on the apparent activation energy of viscous flow of melts of the blends was investigated at different shear stresses and shear rate gradients. It was hypothesized that this blend can be assigned to the group of limitedly compatible systems. The probability of compatibility of the polymers in the melt appears when up to 20% PBT is incorporated in the PP. The blends are not compatible for the remaining ratios of polymers in the investigated system. __________ Translated from Khimicheskie Volokna, No. 5, pp. 17–21, September–October, 2006.     

Mechanical and thermal properties of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) biodegradable blends

Biodegradable polymer blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) were prepared with different compositions. The mechanical properties of the blends were studied through tensile testing and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. The dependence of the elastic modulus and strength data on the blend composition was modeled on the basis of the equivalent box model. The fitting parameters indicated complete immiscibility between PBS and PHBV and a moderate adhesion level between them. The immiscibility of the parent phases was also evidenced by scanning electron observation of the prepared blends. The thermal properties of the blends were studied through differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The DSC results showed an enhancement of the crystallization behavior of PBS after it was blended with PHBV, whereas the thermal stability of PBS was reduced in the blends, as shown by the TGA thermograms. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42815.     

Effects of l‐aspartic acid and poly(butylene succinate) on thermal stability and mechanical properties of poly(propylene carbonate)

Poly(propylene carbonate) (PPC) was modified by l ‐aspartic acid (Asp) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS). To assess the effects of Asp and PBS on the thermal stability, mechanical properties of PPC, different PPC/Asp, PPC/PBS, and PPC/PBS/Asp blends were prepared by twin‐screw extruder. The results indicated that the thermal stability improved with the Asp content increasing from 0.5 to 5%. With trace presence of 2% Asp, the degradation temperature of PPC was greatly increased upon extruding and the Yield strength and Young's modulus increased 62 and 849 times, respectively, at 20°C. The flexibility of PPC was effectively improved by blending with PBS, the PBS has no significant effect on the thermal stability of PPC until PBS up to enough amount. Besides the Asp additive in PPC/PBS blends not only improved the thermal stability PPC, but improved the interfacial compatibility of the blend. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 42970.