Phase II trial of paclitaxel and topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in stage IV breast cancer

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of a combination of paclitaxel and topotecan in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Plasma levels of paclitaxel and topotecan were obtained during cycle 1 to correlate pharmacokinetic parameters with toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel was administered intravenously (i.v.) at 230 mg/m2 over 3 hours on day 1 followed by topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 i.v. over 30 minutes on days 1 to 5. Patients received an abbreviated premedication regimen that consisted of ranitidine 50 mg, diphenhydramine 50 mg, and a single 20-mg dose of dexamethasone, all administered i.v. 30 minutes before paclitaxel. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) was administered at 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously starting on day 6 and continuing until the absolute granulocyte count (AGC) was greater than 10,000/microL. Plasma paclitaxel and topotecan concentrations were assessed during the first cycle using limited-sampling strategies. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated. The majority had visceral metastases. Four patients experienced neutropenic fever and one had mild bronchospasm. Only one partial response (PR) was observed. Nadir AGC correlated strongly with both duration of paclitaxel levels greater than 0.05 mumol/L and maximum concentration (Cmax) of paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: This regimen does not produce a response rate superior to that expected with single-agent paclitaxel at doses that do not require growth factor support.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: neuromuscular toxicity is dose-limiting

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTD), the principal toxicities, and the pharmacologic behavior of high doses of Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY) combined with cisplatin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated and minimally pretreated solid-tumor patients received 24-hour infusions of Taxol on day 1 followed by cisplatin on day 2 and G-CSF, 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously (SC), beginning on day 3. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Starting doses of Taxol and cisplatin were 135 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. RESULTS: The development of a severe peripheral neuropathy and/or severe myalgias precluded the chronic administration of Taxol and cisplatin with G-CSF at doses greater than 250 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose, the mean Taxol steady-state plasma concentration (Css) exceeds concentrations capable of inducing pertinent antimicrotubule effects in vitro. The severity of the neuropathy was related to the cumulative dose of Taxol, the magnitude of the dose administered during each treatment, and the presence of a pre-existing medical disorder associated with peripheral neuropathy. A proximal myopathy of modest severity also was documented. Although severe neutropenia occurred frequently, especially at the MTD, it was rarely associated with fever (8% of courses), and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) less than 500/microL never persisted for more than 5 days. Responses were noted in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and head and neck, breast, and esophageal cancers. CONCLUSION: Taxol and cisplatin doses of 250 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively, can be administered repetitively with G-CSF to untreated and minimally pretreated patients. However, these doses are not recommended for patients with pre-existing neuropathies until additional experience in high-risk patients is obtained. Although this Taxol dose is nearly 85% higher than the dose that can be combined with cisplatin in the absence of G-CSF, this high-dose regimen should not be used outside the investigational setting until a dose-response relationship has been demonstrated for Taxol in randomized clinical trials.     

Phase I/II study of combined granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration for the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells

PURPOSE: To study the toxicity and efficacy of combined granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administration for mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cohorts of a minimum of five patients each were treated subcutaneously as follows: G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 1 to 12 and GM-CSF at .5, 1, or 5 micrograms/kg on days 7 to 12 (cohorts 1, 2, and 3); GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 1 to 12 and G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 7 to 12 (cohort 4); and G-CSF and GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg each on days 1 to 12 (cohort 5). Ten-liter aphereses were performed on days 1 (baseline, pre-CSF), 5, 7, 11, and 13. Colony assays for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) and erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) were performed on each harvest. RESULTS: The principal toxicities were myalgias, bone pain, fever, nausea, and mild thrombocytopenia, but none was dose-limiting. Four days of treatment with either G-CSF or GM-CSF resulted in dramatic and sustained increases in the numbers of CFU-GM per kilogram collected per harvest that represented 35.6 +/- 8.9- and 33.7 +/- 13.0-fold increases over baseline, respectively. This increment was attributable both to increased numbers of mononuclear cells collected per 10-L apheresis and to increased concentrations of progenitors within each collection. The administration of G-CSF to patients already receiving GM-CSF (cohort 4) caused the HPC content to surge to nearly 80-fold the baseline (P = .024); the reverse sequence, ie, the addition of GM-CSF to G-CSF, was less effective. The CFU-GM content of the baseline aphereses correlated with the maximal mobilization achieved (r = .74, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Combined G-CSF and GM-CSF administration effectively and predictably mobilizes HPCs and facilitates apheresis.     

Clinical use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in neutropenia associated with malignancy

G-CSF and GM-CSF have been shown in each clinical setting to reduce the duration of neutropenia, with the exception of the scant data available in the unrelated bone marrow transplant setting. These growth factors also have been shown to have no leukemogenic effect during the observation periods of the trials discussed. In MDS, one major randomized trial has demonstrated a reduction in incidence of infection. This has not yet been demonstrated in AML and allogeneic BMT. Data from ongoing and future trials will be helpful in elucidating their effect on treatment-related morbidity and overall survival.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer is difficult to treat, with most patients surgically unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy can offer palliation, but more effective therapy is needed. This trial evaluated the effects of an aggressive schedule of paclitaxel given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were required to have a histologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Patients had to have performance status of 0 to 2, pretreatment absolute granulocyte count > or = 1,500/microL, and platelet count greater than or equal to the institutional lower limit of normal. Following pretreatment with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine, patients received paclitaxel at a dose of 250 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 1, repeated every 21 days. G-CSF was given at a dose of 5 microg/kg/d on days 3 to 18 or until two consecutive absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) > or = 10,000/microL were obtained. Doses of paclitaxel were modified depending on nadir counts. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered onto this study, with six ineligible. For the 39 eligible patients, there was one complete response (CR) and two partial responses (PRs), five stable/no responses, 23 increasing disease, two early deaths, and six patients whose assessment was inadequate to determine response. The response rate was therefore three of 39 or 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2% to 21%). The median survival time for the 39 eligible patients was 5 months. The most common toxicities were anemia, leukopenia/granulocytopenia, malaise/fatigue, nausea/vomiting, alopecia, thrombocytopenia, paresthesias, and liver function abnormalities. There was one death due to sepsis. CONCLUSION: Single-agent paclitaxel in this dose and schedule has minimal activity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.     

A mesenteric liposarcoma with production of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

A 77-year-old female was admitted to our hospital because of pyrexia and a right retroperitoneal mass. Leukocytosis and other inflammatory findings were noted. Bone-marrow aspiration revealed hypercellularity with no malignant cells. An additional mass was detected sonographically in the pelvis. The serum concentration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was highly elevated (299 pg/ml). The tumors were removed at laparotomy, and the pelvic mass was found to arise from the ileocecal mesentery. Postoperatively, white blood cell count and serum G-CSF concentrations decreased to normal levels. The mesenteric tumor showed weakly positive immunostaining for human G-CSF, and Northern and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses detected CSF and its mRNA in the mesenteric tumor.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, in patients with varying degrees of renal excretory dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with normal renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCl) > or = 60 mL/min] and 28 patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction were treated with topotecan 0.4 to 2.0 mg/m2/d as a 30-minute infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Plasma and urine samples were obtained to determine the disposition of topotecan. RESULTS: In patients with mild renal dysfunction (CrCl = 40 to 59 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d and in two of five patients receiving topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d. In patients with moderate renal dysfunction (CrCl = 20 to 39 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients who received topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d, and in two of four patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d; these events were more frequently observed in extensively pretreated patients. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed significant correlations between CrCl and the plasma clearance of both total topotecan [Spearman's correlation coefficient (r2) = 0.65, P = .00001] and topotecan lactone (r2 = 0.65, P = .00003). Mean systemic plasma clearance of total topotecan was significantly reduced in patients with mild (P = .04) and moderate (P = .00006) renal dysfunction. There was no evidence of changes in the pharmacodynamic relationship between topotecan exposure (AUC) and myelotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Dose adjustments are required in patients with moderate, but not mild, renal impairment. For patients with moderate renal dysfunction, the recommended starting dose of topotecan is 0.75 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks. Moreover, extensively pretreated patients need further dose reductions.     

Phase I study of topotecan for pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicity and potential efficacy of topotecan in pediatric patients with refractory malignant solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I clinical trial, 27 patients received topotecan 0.75-1.9 mg/m2 by continuous intravenous infusion daily for 3 days. Fifty-three treatment courses were given to these patients. RESULTS: Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity at levels of 1.3 to 1.9 mg/m2 for 3 days, requiring significant support with transfused packed RBCs and platelets. Myelosuppression was variable in severity at the 1.0-mg/m2 dosage level; thus, additional patients were treated with this dosage, followed by human recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Other toxicities were not significant. One patient with neuroblastoma had a complete response that lasted for 8 months. Stable disease activity was recorded for other patients with neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and islet cell carcinoma. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that topotecan plasma concentrations ranged from 1.6 to 7.5 ng/mL during infusions of 1.0 mg/m2/d, and that there was a biphasic plasma distribution with a mean terminal half-life of 2.9 +2- 1.0 hours. CONCLUSION: Topotecan is a promising anticancer agent that deserves phase II testing in pediatric solid tumors. We recommend that pediatric phase II topotecan trials use 1.0 mg/m2/d for 3 days as a constant intravenous infusion, followed by G-CSF for 14 days, and that these treatment courses be repeated every 21 days.     

Allogeneic-blood stem-cell collection following mobilization with low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

PURPOSE: The optimal dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization of allogeneic-blood stem cells (AlloBSC) has yet to be determined. As part of a prospective trial, 41 related human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors had blood cells mobilized with G-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg/d by subcutaneous administration. The purpose of this trial was to monitor adverse effects during G-CSF administration and stem-cell collection, to determine the optimal timing for stem-cell collection, and to determine the cellular composition of stem-cell products following G-CSF administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The median donor age was 42 years. Apheresis began on day 4 of G-CSF administration. At least three daily 12-L apheresis collections were performed on each donor. A minimum of 1.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (recipient weight) and 8.0 x 10(8) mononuclear cells/kg were collected from each donor. All collections were cryopreserved in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide and 6% hydroxyethyl starch. RESULTS: Toxicities associated with G-CSF administration and the apheresis process included myalgias/arthralgias (83%), headache (44%), fever (27%), and chills (22%). The median baseline platelet count of 242 x 10(4)/ mL decreased to 221, 155, and 119 x 10(6)/mL on days 4, 5, and 6 of G-CSF administration, respectively. Median numbers of CD34+ cells in collections 1, 2, and 3 were 1.99, 2.52, and 3.13 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. The percentage and total number of CD4+, CD8+, and CD56+/CD3- cells remained relatively constant during the three collections. Median total numbers of cells were as follows: CD34+, 7.73 x 10(6)/kg; and lymphocytes, 6.93 x 10(8)/kg. CONCLUSION: Relatively low doses of G-CSF can mobilize sufficient numbers of AlloBSC safely and efficiently.     

Enhancement of cytosine arabinoside cytotoxicity by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in a human myeloblastic leukemia cell line

Enhancement of the cytotoxicity of cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and the mechanisms involved, were studied in the AML-193 human leukemia cell line. AML-193 cells require GM-CSF and G-CSF(CSFs) for optimum growth, and 24 h deprivation of CSFs decreased DNA synthesis measured in terms of 3H-thymidine incorporation. The DNA synthesis gradually recovered upon addition of CSFs. To examine the sensitivity to ara-C under different growth conditions, two groups of cell suspensions, one pretreated with CSFs after 24 h deprivation (CSFs(+) cells), and the other held continuously under CSFs-free conditions (CSFs(-) cells), were exposed to 1.0 microgram/ml of ara-C for 16 h. In clonogenic assays, CSFs(+) cells showed higher sensitivity to ara-C than CSFs(-) cells. These cell groups showed no significant difference in ara-C triphosphate accumulation or retention, though the amount of ara-C incorporated into the acid-insoluble fraction was two times greater in CSFs(+) cells than CSFs(-) cells, and that difference became even clearer in the retention pools. These data suggest that the enhancement of cytotoxicity by CSFs was due to the promotion of ara-C incorporation into DNA as a result of an increase of the cell fraction in the S phase.     

Levels of serum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with cerebrovascular diseases

The role of leukocytes in the pathogenesis of cerebrovascular disease, in particular, cerebral ischemic disease has recently become a focus of research. Several studies have reported that a positive correlation between increased functional activities of neutrophils and the risk of cerebral ischemic disease. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to be not only a granulocyte proliferating factor but also a potent activator of mature neutrophils. In this study, we measured the serum G-CSF levels in 143 patients with cerebrovascular diseases and in 100 patients with other diseases, using our established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for G-CSF The minimal detection level was 20 pg/ml G-CSF. In patients with cerebral infarction, G-CSF could be detected in 18.3% and in patients with cerebral hemorrhage, it could be detected in 9.8% of analyzed samples. On the other hand, 6% of the patients with other diseases had measurable levels of G-CSF. The differences among these three groups were statistically significant according to the chi 2 test (p < 0.01). Our findings that there was a significantly high frequency of elevated levels of G-CSF among patients with cerebrovascular diseases, may indicate that the action of G-CSF as a potent activator of neutrophils plays some role in the occurrence of cerebrovascular disease, in particular, cerebral infarction.     

Effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in cirrhotic rats with pneumococcal pneumonia

A rat model was used to study the effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the pathogenesis of pneumococcal pneumonia in cirrhosis. G-CSF or 5% dextrose in water was administered subcutaneously to cirrhotic and control rats before or after transtracheal infection with type 3 Streptococcus pneumoniae. In both groups, G-CSF significantly increased the total number and percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL) in peripheral blood (P < .002) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (P < .01). An in vivo phagocytosis assay revealed no increase in uptake of pneumococci by PMNL within the lungs of cirrhotic or control rats receiving G-CSF. G-CSF administered before infection did not protect cirrhotic or control rats, but G-CSF treatment after infection significantly reduced mortality in control (P = .04) but not cirrhotic rats. These data suggest that despite increasing numbers of circulating and pulmonary PMNL, G-CSF does not protect against fatal pneumococcal pneumonia in cirrhotic rats.     

A case of multiple myeloma producing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

A case of multiple myeloma (IgA-lambda) with marked granulocytosis, which measured up to 9.9 x 10(4)/mm3, is described. Matured neutrophils were predominant and blasts were not found in the peripheral blood. The serum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was notably elevated. The disease ran a chronic course and granulocytosis and elevated serum G-CSF continued. The patient developed atelectasis and bronchopneumonia, and died of respiratory failure. At autopsy, bone marrow showed marked myeloid hyperplasia in varying states of differentiation. The enlarged spleen also disclosed numerous myeloid cells of varying differentiation. Small aggregations of atypical plasma cells were present in the marrow and spleen. Immunohistochemically, atypical plasma cells were positive for anti-G-CSF antibody, which indicated G-CSF secretion from the myeloma cells. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of G-CSF-producing multiple myeloma.