Synergistic effects of ACE inhibition and Ang II antagonism on blood pressure, cardiac weight, and renin in spontaneously hypertensive rats

BACKGROUND: Blockade of type 1 angiotensin (Ang) II receptors combined with ACE inhibition may amplify the efficacy of the renin-angiotensin system blockade because ACE inhibitors do not completely and permanently suppress Ang II production. METHODS AND RESULTS: Enalapril or losartan (1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg) or their combination was administered for 2 to 4 weeks to spontaneously hypertensive rats. The combination of low doses of each agent induced greater reductions in blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular weight/body weight (LVW/ BW) ratio than monotherapy with the same or higher doses. When approximately equipotent regimens of enalapril, losartan, and their combination, as judged by BP fall, were compared, there were similar increases in plasma and renal renin and in plasma Ang-(1-7) and Ang I and similar reductions in plasma angiotensinogen. Enalapril alone reduced plasma Ang II levels, and losartan alone increased Ang II levels. The combination of enalapril with losartan prevented or reduced the increase in Ang II levels observed with losartan alone. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that the synergistic interaction between the effects of low doses of enalapril and losartan on BP and LVW/BW ratio is due to more effective inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system by their combination than by either agent alone. When both drugs are given together, the ACE inhibitor-induced fall in plasma Ang II results in modulation of the Ang II antagonist-induced reactive rise in Ang II, thereby lowering the plasma Ang II concentration, which competes with the antagonist for the Ang II receptors.     

Determination of sulindac and its metabolites in human serum by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography using on-line post-column ultraviolet irradiation and fluorescence detection

OBJECTIVE: Data concerning the effect of angiotensin II (Ang II) on plasma angiotensinogen levels are conflicting. Although Ang II is reported to stimulate the biosynthesis of angiotensinogen, plasma angiotensinogen is often depleted by renin when the level of renin, and therefore Ang II, increases. In the present study we used the Ang II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist losartan to investigate whether rising plasma Ang II levels stimulate angiotensinogen production to counteract the falling plasma angiotensinogen levels caused by increasing renin activity in plasma. METHOD: Angiotensinogen was measured in plasma from two previously reported studies in which 6-week-old stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) or Dahl salt-sensitive (Dahl-S) rats were fed high-salt diets (4 and 8% sodium chloride, respectively) for 10-12 weeks with or without losartan. RESULTS: As reported previously, plasma renin was suppressed during the first 4 weeks of the high-salt diet but then paradoxically increased in both strains. When plasma renin increased, plasma angiotensinogen levels fell to 45 and 62% of the baseline value. The plasma renin concentration was negatively correlated with plasma angiotensinogen both in SHRSP and in Dahl-S rats (r = -0.76, P < 0.001 and r = -0.60, P < 0.001, respectively). In Dahl-S rats losartan treatment was associated with lower levels of plasma angiotensinogen but caused greater increases in plasma renin. When differences in renin were taken into account, plasma angiotensinogen levels were not different in losartan-treated and untreated Dahl-S rats. Similarly to Dahl-S rats, plasma angiotensinogen fell in SHRSP when renin increased, but SHRSP had higher plasma angiotensinogen levels during losartan treatment because plasma renin concentration was lower. CONCLUSION: The present study shows, in two strains of hypertensive rat, that an increase in plasma renin levels is associated with a fall in plasma angiotensinogen levels. Concurrent treatment with an Ang II AT1 receptor antagonist does not augment this fall, except to the extent that renin rises further. The results provide no evidence for a significant tonic stimulatory effect of Ang II on plasma angiotensinogen levels.     

Antihypertensive activity and pharmacokinetics of KD3-671, a nonpeptide AT1-receptor antagonist, in renal hypertensive dogs

The antihypertensive activity and pharmacokinetics of KD3-671 (previously named KT3-671), a nonpeptide AT1-receptor antagonist, were investigated in renal hypertensive dogs with normal or high plasma renin activity (PRA). A single administration of KD3-671 at 3 and 10 mg/kg, p.o., to the hypertensive dogs with high PRA dose-dependently reduced mean blood pressure (MBP), which was not correlated with plasma KD3-671 concentration. Significant increases in PRA and plasma angiotensin (Ang) II occurred 2 h after KD3-671 dosing. Enalapril at 3 mg/kg, p.o., also reduced MBP. Neither KD3-671 nor enalapril affected heart rate. When given orally once a day for 29 days to the hypertensive dogs with normal PRA, KD3-671 at 3 and 10 mg/kg/day dose-dependently reduced MBP, which was smaller than that in the dogs with high PRA. This was the case for enalapril. The hypotension induced by the first dose of KD3-671 or enalapril was consistently observed after doses 8, 15, 22, and 29. After cessation of repeated dosing, no rebound phenomenon in MBP was observed. Pharmacokinetic parameters of KD3-671 were not influenced by repeated dosing. KD3-671 markedly increased both PRA and plasma Ang II concentration at 2 h after dosing. These results suggest that KD3-671 may be useful for the treatment of hypertension.     

Comparison of blood pressure and angiotensin responses to the renin inhibitor Ro 42-5892 and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To compare the responses of angiotensin II (Ang II) and blood pressure to the renin inhibitor Ro 42-5892 and the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril. SUBJECTS: Eight non-sodium-restricted patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN: A single-blind crossover study. Ro 42-5892 (600 mg orally, once a day) and enalapril (20 mg orally, once a day) were given for 8 days before detailed investigations were carried out. METHODS: Ambulatory blood pressure was measured directly for 24 h by the Oxford technique on three occasions. Off-treatment and on day 8 of treatment with Ro 42-5892 and with enalapril. Ang II was measured by radioimmunoassay after separation by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Plasma renin activity and Ang II were lowered by 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 61-105] and 68% (95% CI 49-87), respectively, 0.5-1 h after Ro 42-5892, but after only 3 h values had returned to baseline. Unlike this rapid and short-term suppression of Ang II, the maximal antihypertensive response to Ro 42-5892 (fall in blood pressure 12.9/9.0 mmHg) occurred only after 6 h. Blood pressure returned to baseline after 8 h. In response to enalapril, Ang II was maximally suppressed by 63% (95% CI 32-94) after 2 h and by 83% (95% CI 76-90) after 8 h. Despite early maximal Ang II suppression, the maximal antihypertensive response to enalapril occurred only after 12 h (fall in blood pressure 25.3/16.3 mmHg). With this compound a significant antihypertensive effect was still present 24 h after dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with enalapril at 20 mg once a day, repeated oral administration of a single dose of Ro 42-5892 at 600 mg caused only short-term suppression of Ang II and blood pressure. Suppression of Ang II and reduction in blood pressure were temporally dissociated, both with the ACE inhibitor and the renin inhibitor. This implies that the blood pressure lowering effect of these inhibitors is caused partly by Ang II suppression outside the circulation.     

Uricosuric effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan is an effective antihypertensive agent with unique uricosuric properties. This study evaluates the uricosuric effects of losartan in 10 hypertensive heart transplant patients with hyperuricemia. METHODS: The patients were randomized to receive losartan 50 mg once daily and enalapril 20 mg once daily for 4 weeks according to a double-blind crossover design. Office blood pressure, plasma uric acid levels, and urinary uric acid excretion were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Plasma uric acid levels decreased significantly after 4 weeks of treatment with losartan (P<0.05) but not with enalapril. On day 1 and after 1 month of treatment, a significant increase in uric acid excretion was observed only with losartan. Significant decreases in office systolic and diastolic blood pressures were obtained with enalapril but not with losartan. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan effectively lowers plasma uric acid levels in hyperuricemic heart transplant patients.     

Effect of chronic treatment with ME3221 on blood pressure and mortality in aged stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats

1. The protective effect of ME3221, a surmountable AT1 antagonist, on the hypertension and its concomitant complications in aged (32 week old) stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) was studied following long-term (32 weeks) oral administration, and compared with those of losartan (metabolite EXP3174 is an insurmountable AT1 antagonist) and enalapril. 2. During the treatment period, ME3221, at a dose of 10 mg/kg per day steadily reduced the systolic blood pressure, and no tolerance was developed to the fall in blood pressure. The reference drugs showed similar activity, but the antihypertensive effect of ME3221 was more potent. 3. In the control group, rats began to die from 52 weeks of age and all rats had died by 64 weeks of age. In contrast, no rats treated with ME3221, losartan or enalapril died before 64 weeks of age. 4. ME3221, losartan and enalapril suppressed the hypertensive complications observed in control SHRSP, that is, cerebral apoplexy (stroke and cerebral oedema), renal injury (increased proteinuria, total N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity and ascites) and heart failure (cardiac hypertrophy and pleural effusion). 5. These results indicate that ME3221 has a stable anti-hypertensive effect, prevents hypertensive complications and prolongs survival in aged SHRSP equally as well as losartan and enalapril.     

Comparison of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the blood pressure lowering efficacy as well as tolerability and safety of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan compared with that of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel study. Patients (n = 407) with diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 and < or = 120 mmHg at the end of a 2-week baseline placebo period were randomly allocated to receive either 50 mg losartan once a day or 20 mg enalapril once a day for 12 weeks. Blood pressure, clinical and laboratory safety, specific symptoms including coughing determined using a symptoms questionnaire and metabolic variables were examined at baseline and at weeks 6 and 12. RESULTS: Both losartan and enalapril decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline at weeks 6 and 12. Blood pressure changes from baseline at trough (22-26 h after the dose) did not differ between the two groups in the per-protocol analysis. Response to treatment at trough was excellent or good (diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or reduction in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mmHg) in 51 and 53% of the patients in the losartan and enalapril groups, respectively. Enalapril administration increased dry coughing symptoms whereas losartan did not. The incidence of dry coughing was 1.0 and 12.2% as a spontaneously reported discomfort at week 12 and 3.0 and 15.1% as a clinical adverse experience in the losartan and enalapril groups, respectively. The difference from baseline at week 12 in the incidence of dry coughing between the two groups was 14.9% as a specific symptom in the symptoms questionnaire. Losartan reduced serum uric acid concentration, whereas effects on other metabolic parameters did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive drug showing similar blood-pressure-lowering efficacy to that of enalapril at trough. However, in contrast to enalapril, losartan does not increase the incidence of dry coughing. Thus, the angiotensin II antagonist losartan provides a promising new approach to treatment of hypertension.     

Targeting TGF-beta overexpression in renal disease: maximizing the antifibrotic action of angiotensin II blockade

BACKGROUND: Overproduction of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is a key mediator of extracellular matrix accumulation in fibrotic diseases. We hypothesized that the degree of reduction of pathological TGF-beta expression can be used as a novel index of the antifibrotic potential of angiotensin II (Ang II) blockade in renal disease. METHODS: One day after induction of Thy 1.1 glomerulonephritis, rats were treated with increasing doses of the Ang I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril and/or the Ang II receptor blocker losartan in the drinking water. Six days after disease induction the therapeutic effect on glomerular TGF-beta overexpression was evaluated. RESULTS: Both enalapril and losartan reduced TGF-beta overproduction in a dose-dependent manner, showing a moderate reduction at doses known to control blood pressure in renal forms of hypertension. A maximal reduction in TGF-beta expression of approximately 45% was seen for both drugs starting at 100 mg/liter enalapril and 500 mg/liter losartan, with no further reduction at doses of enalapril up to 1000 mg/liter or losartan up to 2500 mg/liter. Co-treatment with both drugs was not superior to single therapy. Consistent with our hypothesis that reduction in TGF-beta expression is a valid target, other disease measures, including glomerular matrix accumulation, glomerular production and mRNA expression of the matrix protein fibronectin and the protease inhibitor plasminogen-activator-inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) closely followed TGF-beta expression. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that these therapies act through very similar pathways and that, in order to more effectively treat renal fibrosis, these drugs must be combined with other drugs that act by different mechanisms.     

Comparative effects of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction in the rat

BACKGROUND: After myocardial infarction, the noninfarcted left ventricle develops reactive hypertrophy associated with a depressed coronary flow reserve, myocardial interstitial fibrosis, and reduced capillary density. The present study investigated the comparative cardiac effects of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) blockade in the rat model of myocardial infarction and failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven days after coronary ligation (MI), rats were randomized to enalapril (n = 8; 500 micrograms.kg-1.d-1), losartan (n = 9; 3 mg.kg-1.d-1), or placebo (n = 8) and treated for 6 weeks. Sham-operated rats (n = 10) served as controls. Coronary blood flow was measured with radiolabeled microspheres during baseline and maximal coronary dilation induced by dipyridamole (2 mg.kg-1.min-1 over 10 minutes). Right and left ventricular (LV) weight was increased in infarcted rats compared with sham-operated animals and enalapril- and losartan-treated MI rats. Minimal LV and right ventricular coronary vascular resistance was increased in MI rats but normalized with enalapril and losartan (LV:sham, 8.9; MI-placebo, 12.7; MI-enalapril, 9.2; MI-losartan, 8.8 mm Hg.mL-1.min-1.g-1, all P < .05 versus MI-placebo). Interstitial fibrosis determined from perfusion-fixed hearts was increased in infarcted rats but reduced by both enalapril and losartan. Myocardial capillary density improved with enalapril and losartan. In separate groups treated as above, plasma and tissue ACE activity was determined and demonstrated significantly higher ACE activity in noninfarcted LV tissue of MI-placebo rats compared with sham (0.64 vs 0.27 nmol.mg protein-1.min-1, P < .05). Enalapril and losartan reduced LV ACE activity (0.39 and 0.29 nmol.mg protein-1.min-1, P < .05 versus MI-placebo). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that both chronic ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade (1) reduces cardiac hypertrophy, (2) restores minimal coronary vascular resistance in postinfarction reactive hypertrophy, and (3) attenuates the development of myocardial interstitial fibrosis in the noninfarcted LV. These results suggest that inhibition of generation of angiotensin II and AT1 receptor blockade are equally effective in preventing important features of ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction.     

Cardioprotective effect of enalapril in renovascular and angiotensin II hypertension

The influence of chronic treatment with enalapril or losartan (10 or 30 mg/kg/24h, respectively) on cardiac mass was evaluated in one-kidney, one clip (1K-1C) hypertensive rats submitted to sodium restriction 3 weeks after clipping and in rats infused for 10 days with angiotensin II (ANGII: 200 ng/kg/min). In 1K-1C hypertension, cardiac mass and arterial pressure were reduced to a similar extent by enalapril and losartan. In ANGII hypertension, enalapril and losartan blunted the increase in cardiac mass whereas losartan but not enalapril prevented the development of hypertension. The cardioprotective effect of enalapril was attenuated by concomitant blockade of bradykinin receptors (Hoe140: 300 micrograms/kg/24h) in both models. The beneficial influence of enalapril on cardiac mass appears to be independent of its effect on blood pressure and ANGII generation and seems partly mediated by endogenous bradykinin in these high ANGII models of hypertension.     

ACE inhibition but not angiotensin II antagonism reduces plasma fibrinogen and insulin resistance in overweight hypertensive patients

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor perindopril and the angiotensin II antagonist losartan on insulin sensitivity and plasma fibrinogen in overweight hypertensive patients. Twenty-eight overweight mild to moderate [diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 and <110 mm Hg] hypertensives aged 43-64 years, after a 4-week placebo period, were randomized to perindopril, 4 mg o.d., or losartan, 50 mg o.d., for 6 weeks. Then, after a new placebo period, patients were crossed to the alternative regimen for further 6 weeks. At the end of the placebo and of the treatment periods, blood pressure was measured, plasma fibrinogen was evaluated, and insulin sensitivity was assessed by the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Glucose infusion rate (GIR) during the last 30 min of clamp and total glucose requirement (TGR) were evaluated. Both perindopril and losartan reduced SBP (by a mean of 20.2 mm Hg, p < 0.001 vs. placebo; and 15.8 mm Hg, p = 0.002 vs. placebo, respectively) and DBP (by a mean of 15.2 mm Hg, p = 0.001 vs. placebo, and 11.8 mm Hg, p = 0.01 vs. placebo respectively), with no difference between the two treatments. GIR was significantly increased by perindopril (+2.91 mg/min/kg, p = 0.042 vs. placebo), but not by losartan (+0.28 mg/min/kg, NS). TGR was not modified by losartan but was increased by perindopril (+9.3 g, p = 0.042 vs. placebo). Plasma fibrinogen levels were reduced by perindopril (-53.4 mg/dl, p = 0.022 vs. placebo) but not by losartan (-16.8 mg/dl, NS). The perindopril-induced decrease in fibrinogen was correlated with the increase in GIR (r = 0.39; p < 0.01). These findings suggest that fibrinogen decrease produced by the ACE inhibitor is related to its action on insulin sensitivity, which seems to be dependent not on angiotensin II blockade but rather on other mechanisms.     

Effects of captopril related to increased levels of prostacyclin and angiotensin-(1-7) in essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] and prostaglandins to the acute and long-term antihypertensive actions of captopril in mild-to-moderate essential hypertensive patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood pressure, cardiac rate and the plasma concentrations of angiotensin I (Ang I), angiotensin II (Ang II), Ang-(1-7), prostaglandin E2 and 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha (the breakdown product of prostacyclin) were determined in the peripheral venous blood of 24 essential hypertensive subjects before and 3 h after administration of 50 mg captopril. Eleven of 24 patients completed a 6-month treatment period with captopril monotherapy (50 mg twice a day). The hemodynamic and hormonal response produced by a last 50 mg dose of captopril was determined once again in the 11 subjects who maintained blood pressure control with captopril monotherapy for 6 months. RESULTS: The fall in blood pressure produced 3 h after drug intake was comparable for the first and the last 50 mg captopril dose. Although the first response to captopril increased plasma levels of Ang I only, the response to the last dose of the drug (6 months after) caused significantly higher levels of Ang I and Ang-(1-7). Neither acute nor chronic therapy with captopril had a significant effect on plasma concentrations of Ang II. Although plasma levels of prostaglandin E2 and 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha were not modified by a first exposure to captopril, the concentrations of 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha but not prostaglandin E2 rose significantly in subjects treated with the inhibitor for 6 months. A negative correlation was also demonstrated between diastolic blood pressure and plasma Ang-(1-7) levels in the 11 essential hypertensive subjects in whom blood pressure was controlled with captopril monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme with captopril had a significant effect on blood pressure that was not directly accounted for by a suppression of plasma Ang II levels. Continuous therapy with captopril unmasked a contribution of Ang-(1-7) and prostacyclin to the antihypertensive actions of this drug.     

Metoclopramide blocks bromocriptine induced antihypertensive effect in hypertensive patients

Two groups of patients with essential hypertension were studied at the Vargas Hospital of Caracas. The first group of 9 patients under placebo treatment for 1 week received a single 2.5 mg oral dose of bromocriptine. Cardiovascular and biochemical parameters including arterial pressure, heart rate, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone levels were evaluated during the 6-hour period before and after the administration of drugs. The second experimental design was as follows: 9 patients received 30 mg metoclopramide daily (divided in 3 doses) for 1 week. At the end of the period a single oral dose of 2.5 mg of bromocriptine was given to each patient. The cardiovascular and biochemical parameters were also determined. Bromocriptine reduced both systolic and diastolic arterial pressure. The peak antihypertensive effect was shown 3 hours after administration of the drug, but the reduction of arterial pressure lasted approximately 6 hours. At the same time bromocriptine reduced plasma aldosterone levels and plasma renin activity. This reduction persisted 6 hours after its administration. Metoclopramide reversed the antihypertensive effect of bromocriptine and its effect on aldosterone secretion and plasma renin activity. We conclude from these findings that bromocriptine acts as an antihypertensive agent by stimulating DA2 dopaminergic receptor, the dopaminergic receptor involved in aldosterone and renin secretion is possibly DA2.     

Anti-hyperalgesic and anti-allodynic effects of intrathecal nociceptin/orphanin FQ in rats after spinal cord injury, peripheral nerve injury and inflammation

OBJECTIVE: To compare the acute and sustained renal hemodynamic effects on hypertensive patients of 100 mg irbesartan and 20 mg enalapril each once daily. PATIENTS: Twenty patients (aged 35-70 years) with uncomplicated, mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and normal serum creatinine levels completed this study. STUDY DESIGN: After random allocation to treatment (n=10 per group), administration schedule (morning or evening) was determined by further random allocation, with crossover of schedules after 6 weeks' therapy. Treatment and administration assignments were double-blind. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure was monitored before and after 6 and 12 weeks of therapy. Renal hemodynamics were determined on the first day of drug administration and 12 and 24 h after the last dose during chronic treatment. RESULTS: Administration of each antihypertensive agent induced a renal vasodilatation with no significant change in glomerular filtration rate. However, the time course appeared to differ: irbesartan had no significant acute effect 4 h after the first dose, but during chronic administration a renal vasodilatory response was found 12 and 24 h after the dose; enalapril was effective acutely and 12 h after administration, but no residual effect was found 24 h after the dose. Both antihypertensive agents lowered mean ambulatory blood pressure effectively, with no significant difference between treatments or between administration schedules (morning versus evening). CONCLUSIONS: Irbesartan and enalapril have comparable effects on blood pressure and renal hemodynamics in hypertensive patients with normal renal functioning. However, the time profiles of the renal effects appear to differ, which might be important for long-term renoprotective effects.     

Angiotensin I modulates Ca-transport systems in the rat heart through angiotensin II

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of angiotensin I (Ang I) treatment in vivo on two major Ca-transport systems-the L-type voltage dependent calcium channel (L-VDCC) and the Na/Ca exchanger in rat heart. For our experiments we used four groups of rats, treated differently with saline, Ang I, the ACE inhibitor enalapril and/or combination of both for 6 days, every 24 h. We observed an increase in the activity, and also in mRNA expression of the Na/Ca exchanger, after repeated administration of Ang I in vivo. The maximal binding capacity of Ca-antagonist PN 200-110, which binds to the alpha 1 subunit of the L-VDCC was elevated from 0.8-1.85 pg/mg protein. mRNA expression of the voltage-dependent calcium channels of L-type system was also upregulated by Ang I administration, but not when enalapril was applied simultaneously with Ang I. These results demonstrate that in vivo application of the Ang I significantly modulates not only the activity, but also expression of the Na/Ca exchanger and the L-VDCC in rat hearts through angiotensin II (Ang II). Since in the in vitro experiments on the isolated cardiomyocytes, Ang II (100 nM) increased the calcium uptake after depolarization, and the AT1 receptor agonist losartan prevented this increase, we assume that this regulation might involve the AT1 receptors.     

Losartan blocks aldosterone and renal vascular responses to angiotensin II in humans

In vitro and animal studies have demonstrated that the effect of angiotensin II (Ang II) on aldosterone is mediated through the Ang II type 1 receptor. However, it has been difficult to demonstrate an effect of Ang II type 1 receptor blockade on aldosterone levels in human studies. One possible explanation is that subjects have not been studied under salt-controlled conditions. Therefore, we examined the effects of losartan on the aldosterone and renal plasma flow responses to Ang II infusion in six normotensive subjects under low and high salt conditions. Ang II was infused in graded doses (0.3 to 10 ng/kg per minute) in the presence and absence of losartan (a single 50-mg oral dose). Renal plasma flow was assessed by measurement of para-aminohippurate clearance. Blood pressure, plasma aldosterone levels (low salt conditions only), and para-aminohippurate clearance were measured before and after each Ang II dose. Losartan had no effect on baseline systolic pressure but attenuated the systolic pressure response to exogenous Ang II during both low salt (0.7 +/- 1.9 versus 6.7 +/- 1.4 mm Hg, P = .001) and high salt (2.0 +/- 1.9 versus 12.3 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, P = .006) conditions. Under low salt conditions, losartan reduced the baseline plasma aldosterone level from 1135 +/- 204 to 558 +/- 102 pmol/L (P = .015) and blocked the aldosterone response to Ang II (-49 +/- 110 versus +436 +/- 83 pmol/L, P = .019). During high salt conditions, losartan had no effect on baseline renal plasma flow but attenuated the renal plasma flow response to Ang II (-90.1 +/- 15.1 versus -185.1 +/- 2.6 mL/min per 1.73 m2, P = .013). These data confirm that losartan lowers both basal and exogenous Ang II-stimulated aldosterone levels under low salt conditions. Losartan does not significantly affect baseline renal plasma flow but does attenuate the renal plasma flow response to exogenous Ang II under high salt conditions.     

Antihypertensive effect of chronic KT3-671, a structurally new nonpeptide angiotensin AT1-receptor antagonist, in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats

KT3-671 (2-propyl-8-oxo-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazole-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]-4,5,6, 7-tetrahydrocycloheptimidazole), a structurally new nonpeptide angiotensin AT1-receptor antagonist, was administered orally and repeatedly to 15-week-old stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats for 7 weeks; and its effects on blood pressure, heart rate, renal function, plasma renin concentration (PRC), plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and hypertension-related tissue damage in the brain, heart, kidney and mesenteric artery were investigated. KT3-671 at a dose of 3 or 10 mg/kg, p.o. per day prevented development of hypertension and produced a significant and consistent reduction of blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. Enalapril at a dose of 10 mg/kg per day produced cardiovascular effects similar to those of KT3-671 at 10 mg/kg. Despite marked reduction in blood pressure, neither KT3-671 nor enalapril affected the heart rate. KT3-671 at 10 mg/kg produced a transient and significant reduction of urinary sodium excretion in the second week, but did not affect renal function at any other time during the experimental period. Both KT3-671 at 10 mg/kg and enalapril at 10 mg/kg produced a significant increase in PRC and showed a tendency to decrease PAC. Repeated administration of KT3-671 reduced the severity of the pathological changes in the kidney. These results suggest that KT3-671 is a potentially useful antihypertensive drug.     

Public health developments in colonial Malaya: colonialism and the politics of prevention

-Previous studies have shown that whereas the nonclipped kidney in two-kidney, one clip (2K1C) rats undergoes marked depletion of renin content and renin mRNA, intrarenal angiotensin II (Ang II) levels are not suppressed; however, the distribution and functional consequences of intrarenal Ang II remain unclear. The present study was performed to assess the plasma, kidney, and proximal tubular fluid levels of Ang II and the renal responses to intrarenal Ang II blockade in the nonclipped kidneys of rats clipped for 3 weeks. The Ang II concentrations in proximal tubular fluid averaged 9.19+/-1.06 pmol/mL, whereas plasma Ang II levels averaged 483+/-55 fmol/mL and kidney Ang II content averaged 650+/-66 fmol/g. Thus, as found in kidneys from normal rats with normal renin levels, proximal tubular fluid concentrations of Ang II are in the nanomolar range. To avoid the confounding effects of decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP), we administered the nonsurmountable AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan directly into the renal artery of nonclipped kidneys (n=10). The dose of candesartan (0.5 microg) did not significantly decrease MAP in 2K1C rats (152+/-3 versus 148+/-3 mm Hg), but effectively prevented the renal vasoconstriction elicited by an intra-arterial bolus of Ang II (2 ng). Candesartan elicited significant increases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (0.65+/-0. 06 to 0.83+/-0.11 mL. min-1. g-1) and renal blood flow (6.3+/-0.7 to 7.3+/-0.9 mL. min-1. g-1), and proportionately greater increases in absolute sodium excretion (0.23+/-0.07 to 1.13+/-0.34 micromol. min-1. g-1) and fractional sodium excretion (0.38+/-0.1% to 1.22+/-0. 35%) in 2K1C hypertensive rats. These results show that proximal tubular fluid concentrations of Ang II are in the nanomolar range and are much higher than can be explained on the basis of plasma levels. Further, the data show that the intratubular levels of Ang II in the nonclipped kidneys of 2K1C rats remain at levels found in kidneys with normal renin content and could be exerting effects to suppress renal hemodynamic and glomerular function and to enhance tubular reabsorption rate.     

Total-body and regional bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density in children aged 8-18 y: the Fels Longitudinal Study

We used a modification of the isolated perfused rat heart, in which coronary effluent and interstitial transudate were separately collected, to investigate the localization and production of angiotensin II (Ang II) in the heart. During combined renin (0.7 to 1.5 pmol Ang I/mL per minute) and angiotensinogen (6 to 12 pmol/mL) perfusion (4 to 8 mL/min) for 60 minutes (n=3), the steady-state levels of Ang II in interstitial transudate in two consecutive 10-minute periods were 4.3+/-1.5 and 3.6+/-1.5 fmol/mL compared with 1.1+/-0.4 and 1.1+/-0.6 fmol/mL in coronary effluent (mean+/-half range). During perfusion with Ang II (n=5), steady-state Ang II in interstitial transudate was 32+/-19% of arterial Ang II compared with 65+/-16% in coronary effluent (mean+/-SD, P<.02). During perfusion with Ang I (n=5), Ang II in interstitial transudate was 5.1+/-0.6% of arterial Ang I compared with 2.2+/-0.3% in coronary effluent (P<.05). The tissue concentration of Ang II in the combined renin/angiotensinogen perfusions (per gram) was as high as the concentration in interstitial transudate (per milliliter). Addition of losartan (10(-6) mol/L) to the renin/angiotensinogen perfusion (n=3) had no significant effect on the tissue level of Ang II, whereas losartan in the perfusions with Ang I (n=5) or Ang II (n=5) decreased tissue Ang II to undetectably low levels. The results indicate that the heart is capable of producing Ang II and that this can lead to higher levels in tissue than in blood plasma. Cardiac Ang II does not appear to be restricted to the extracellular fluid. This is in part due to AT1-receptor-mediated cellular uptake of extracellular Ang II, but our results also raise the possibility of intracellular Ang II production.     

Barnidipine, a novel calcium antagonist for once-daily treatment of hypertension: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Dutch Barnidipine Multicenter Study Group

The antihypertensive effects and tolerance of once-daily barnidipine, a novel dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, were evaluated. A total of 190 patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 95-114 mmHg were investigated in this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. After a 4-week single-blind placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to placebo or barnidipine (10 mg, 20 mg, or 30 mg modified release capsules) once daily for 6 weeks. Nonresponders (sitting DBP > or =90 mmHg and a decrease of < 10 mmHg) were treated for an additional 6 weeks with a dose increase of 10 mg. At each clinic visit, sitting and standing blood pressure and heart rate were measured approximately 24 hours after the last dose of study drug was taken. Compared with placebo, barnidipine lowered blood pressure, with a trend toward a dose-response relationship over the dose range 10-30 mg. A dose increment of 10 mg in nonresponders resulted in additional reductions in blood pressure. At the end of the active treatment period, the responder rates were 41% and 57% for 10 mg and 20 mg barnidipine, respectively. Heart rate in both sitting and standing positions was not affected by barnidipine. Treatment with barnidipine was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events was dose related and consistent with vasodilatation. In conclusion, barnidipine (10-30 mg) administered once daily is well tolerated and reduces blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.