建筑工程审核中索赔与反索赔分析

建筑工程中的索赔和反索赔现象非常常见,建筑工程中的承包方可以向合同发包商提出索赔,索赔可以保护承包方的利益,合理有效的索赔可以增加企业的经济效益;工程合同的发包方也可以对承包商进行反索赔。本文对当前建筑工程中的索赔与反索赔现象进行分析,主要分析了索赔和反索赔的原因和依据,为以后建筑工程中索赔和反索赔现象的解决提供借鉴。     

工程合同索赔与反索赔初探

介绍了工程合同索赔和反索赔的概念，通过对承包商、监理工程师与索赔和发包商与反索赔正反两方面的阐述，总结出了索赔与反索赔的一般程序、方法及依据。     

建设工程施工索赔和反索赔的探讨

索赔与反索赔是工程建设合同管理的一个重要内容,针对当前索赔与反索赔的认识误区,阐明了索赔与反索赔的概念,进而具体分析了二者之间的关系和对建筑市场的作用。     

谈建设工程监理工作中索赔与反索赔的作用

明确了建设工程中索赔与反索赔的类型,对合同中的索赔事件进行了罗列,指明了索赔的依据和程序,并阐述了建设工程中反索赔的定义及审批流程,以正确处理监理工作中索赔与反索赔的关系,真正发挥二者在建设工程监理工作中的作用。     

论工程施工索赔与反索赔

结合索赔概念,介绍了承包人在工程施工中要求索赔的起因、索赔程序及发包人反索赔的方法,指出施工项目潜在的索赔机会是客观存在的,要善于运用合同条件,进行索赔和反索赔工作,以维护自身权利.     

建设工程施工索赔和反索赔

本文在对当前索赔与反索赔认识误区分析的基础上,阐明了索赔与反索赔的概念,进而具体分析了二者之间的关系和对建筑市场的作用。     

FIDIC合同条件下的索赔与反索赔

讨论了ＦＩＤＩＣ合同条件下承包商的索赔事件及其索赔程序、索赔注意事项和业主的反索赔措施,分析了索赔与反索赔的解决方式,有益于国际工程承包企业开展索赔与反索赔工作,更好地发展并获取效益     

浅析建设工程中的索赔与反索赔

介绍了建设工程预防索赔的基本对策,从设计、施工、意外风险和不可预见因素等方面分析了索赔与反索赔的原因,研究了索赔的依据,以及审查和反驳的措施及方法,并对索赔程序进行了概述.     

浅谈建设工程项目的索赔与反索赔

在建设工程中正确处理施工过程中的索赔,可最大限度的降低施工成本,取得最大的经济效益。本文主要从我国建设工程施工中索赔的现状,工程索赔的现实意义,实际操作中建设工程索赔与反索赔的关系,反索赔进行阐述,以供参考。     

建设工程施工索赔和反索赔的探讨

结合当前建筑市场发展趋势,具体介绍了建设工程中常遇的施工索赔和反索赔。从风险引起的索赔,工程延长和延误的索赔,工程量变化太大引起的索赔等几方面进行了论述,说明了施工索赔和反索赔,对于培养和发展建设市场,促进建筑业的发展,起着非常重要的作用。     

施工企业工程索赔要点探讨

从掌握合同文件、主动把握索赔机会、收集索赔证据、准确合理计算索赔数据、及时提交索赔报告、积极预防反索赔等方面系统分析了索赔要点,以帮助施工企业提高自身的索赔管理水平,不仅敢于索赔,而且善于索赔。     

浅析国际工程承包活动中承包商的索赔工作

针对国际工程承包活动中承包商索赔工作进行了分析,陈述了概念、种类、程序等,同时对防止索赔、反索赔等项工作进行了分析,阐述了索赔在国际工程承包活动中的重要性。     

浅谈工程造价控制中的索赔与反索赔

就施工阶段工程造价控制中索赔与反索赔造成的原因、实施条件、程序、难点等进行了探讨,并列举了一些实际案例.     

关于建设单位施工索赔管理的研究

施工索赔管理是项目的施工过程一个重要环节。对索赔要做到科学面对、提前面对和依法面对。本文将从索赔事件发生的时间点角度出发,分别从事件发生前、中、后对索赔管理予以梳理和分析,以此来防止在今后的施工项目中类似事件的发生。     

Resolution of disputes arising from set-off clauses between main contractors and subcontractors

Set-off relates to the situation where a main contractor raises a counterclaim against a subcontractor's claim or where an employer raises a counterclaim against the main contractor. The alternative terms cross claim, counterclaim, contra charge, compensation and retention are explained in the context of Scots law. Set-off in the construction industry in Scotland is then discussed within the contractual frameworks upon which main contractors are entitled to exercise such rights and how these conditions of contract have been formed over recent years. A study reported shows the extent of the use of amended and unamended forms of subcontract and main contractors' own forms of subcontract which imposed more onerous set-off conditions than the standard forms, the reasons given by main contractors for exercising their rights of set-off, the level of satisfaction amongst subcontractors with the sums set-off against them, the means by which main contractors and subcontractors settled disputed set-offs, and subcontractors' reasons for accepting unsatisfactory instances of set-off. The research was undertaken using a questionnaire to a stratified sample of subcontractors throughout central Scotland in 1995. Forty-seven subcontractors responded to the questionnaire and 427 instances of set-off were recorded. The study indicated that, despite the considerable protection given to subcontractors in the standard forms of subcontract and in common law, they were prepared to settle set-offs with which they were dissatisfied without initiating contractual proceedings which would have improved their situation. It would appear from this study that subcontractors are reluctant to use their contractual entitlements either because of fears over the costs of disputing set-offs or because they fear that they will be denied opportunities to tender for work in the future. Until there is a culture shift in the industry, reliance on contractual conditions alone may be inadequate to meet the needs of subcontractors.     

Minority Business Access to Mainstream Markets

As minority‐owned firms have penetrated the broader national marketplace—selling goods and services to corporate as well as government clients—the issue of capacity has surfaced. Particularly in government markets, one claim is that minority business enterprises (MBEs) are smaller, younger firms than nonminorities, and hence they often lack the capacity to compete effectively for government contracts. Affirmative action procurement programs, in this view, provide preferential treatment for less qualified businesses, generating reverse discrimination against the dominant, typically white‐male group of business owners. A counterclaim, put forth by proponents of preferential procurement programs, is that discriminatory barriers such as entrenched old‐boy networks impede MBE expansion into mainstream markets. Do the entrenched networks really thwart MBEs, or do they simply lack the capacity to compete? Empirical findings of this study support the discriminatory barrier explanation.     

工程施工分包商和总承包商配合与索赔的探讨

结合自身工作实践,介绍了国内工程施工管理现状,阐述了国内工程分包中存在的问题,并对总承包商与分包商之间的权利、义务及配合等进行了探讨,提出了分包商索赔时应考虑事项,以期规范分包商与总承包商之间的合作。     

浅谈建筑施工企业如何提高索赔意识

阐述了工程索赔的种类及索赔费用的构成,对如何提高索赔意识和加强索赔管理进行了分析,介绍了引起索赔常见的因素,并对工程反索赔进行了简要介绍,提出了现阶段加强索赔管理的措施,从而形成有效索赔。     

施工企业项目成本管理的组织与对策

本文从项目责任成本的测定、成本责任制的落实、成本的动态控制和制定企业定额、加强变更索赔的管理等方面,阐述了施工企业应如何科学地建立成本管理体系和加强成本管理,以实现最佳经济效益的目标。