Differential effects of endotoxaemia on pressor and vasoconstrictor actions of angiotensin II and arginine vasopressin in conscious rats

1. Regional haemodynamic responses to arginine vasopressin (AVP; 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 pmol i.v.) and angiotensin II (AII; 5.0, 10.0, 50.0 pmol i.v.) were measured in conscious Long Evans rats at various times (0, 2, 6 and 24 h) during infusion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 150 microg kg(-1) h(-1), i.v., n=9) or saline (n=9). Additional experiments were performed in vasopressin-deficient (Brattleboro) rats infused with LPS (n=7) or saline (n=8) to determine whether or not, in the absence of circulating vasopressin, responses to the exogenous peptides differed from those in Long Evans rats. 2. In the Long Evans rats, during the 24 h infusion of LPS, there was a changing haemodynamic profile with renal vasodilatation from 2 h onwards, additional mesenteric vasodilatation at 6 h, and a modest hypotension (reduction in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) from 103+/-1 to 98+/-2 mmHg) associated with renal and hindquarters vasodilatation at 24 h. 3. In the Brattleboro rats, the changes in regional haemodynamics during LPS infusion were more profound than in the Long Evans rats. At 2 h and 6 h, there was a marked fall in MAP (from 103+/-3 mmHg; to 65+/-3 mmHg at 2 h, and to 82+/-4 mmHg at 6 h) associated with vasodilatation in all three vascular beds. After 24 h infusion of LPS, the hypotension was less although still significant (from 103+/-3 mmHg; to 93+/-4 mmHg, a change of 10+/-4 mmHg), and there was renal and hindquarters vasodilatation, but mesenteric vasoconstriction. 4. During infusion of LPS, at each time point studied, and in both strains of rat, pressor responses to AII and AVP were reduced, but the changes were less marked at 6 h than at 2 h or 24 h. The reduced pressor responses were not accompanied by generalized reductions in the regional vasoconstrictor responses. Thus, in the Long Evans rats, the renal vasoconstrictor responses to both peptides were enhanced (at 6 h and 24 h for AVP; at all times for AII), whereas the mesenteric vasoconstrictor response to AVP was unchanged at 2 h, enhanced at 6 h and reduced at 24 h. The mesenteric vasoconstrictor response to AII was reduced at 2 h, normal at 6 h and reduced at 24 h. The small hindquarters vasoconstrictor responses to both peptides were reduced at 2 h and 6 h, but normal at 24 h. 5. In the Brattleboro rats, the renal vasoconstrictor responses to both peptides were reduced at 2 h and enhanced at 6 h and 24 h, whereas the mesenteric vasoconstrictor response to AVP was normal at 2 h and 6 h, and reduced at 24 h. The response to AII was reduced at 2 h, normal at 6 h and reduced again at 24 h. There were no reproducible hindquarters vasoconstrictions to AVP in the Brattleboro rats. The small hindquarters vasoconstrictor responses to AII were unchanged at 2 h and enhanced at 6 h and 24 h. 6. In isolated perfused mesenteric vascular beds, removed after 24 h of LPS infusion in vivo, there was an increase in the potency of AVP in both strains (Long Evans, ED50 saline: 56.9+/-15.0 pmol, ED50 LPS: 20.4+/-4.8 pmol, Brattleboro, ED50 saline: 38.6+/-4.2, ED50 LPS: 19.6+/-2.9 pmol), but no change in the responses to AII. 7. These findings indicate that a reduced pressor response to a vasoconstrictor challenge during LPS infusion is not necessarily associated with a reduced regional vasoconstriction. The data obtained in the Brattleboro rats indicate a potentially important role for vasopressin in maintaining haemodynamic status during LPS infusion in Long Evans rats. However, it is unlikely that the responses to exogenous AVP (or AII) are influenced by changes in the background level of endogenous vasopressin, since the patterns of change were similar in Long Evans and Brattleboro rats. 8. The results obtained in isolated perfused mesenteric vascular beds differed from those in vivo, possibly due to the conditions pertaining with in vitro perfusion.     

Mechanisms of the regional hemodynamic effects of a mu-opioid receptor agonist microinjected into the hypothalamic paraventricular nuclei of conscious unrestrained rats

The present study was undertaken to characterize the mechanisms of the hemodynamic responses to microinjection of the selective mu-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, in conscious rats chronically instrumented with pulsed Doppler flow probes. We found that i.v. pretreatment with phentolamine had no effect on the tachycardia elicited by DAMGO (1 nmol); however, the pressor response was reversed to a state of hypotension, the renal and superior mesenteric vasoconstrictions were attenuated and the hindquarter vasodilation was potentiated. In the presence of propranolol, the pressor response and renal vasoconstriction were unchanged, whereas the superior mesenteric vasoconstriction was reduced and the hindquarter vasodilation was abolished. Moreover, in those animals we observed bradycardia followed by tachycardia. Combined i.v. pretreatment with phentolamine and propranolol abolished the pressor and heart rate responses to DAMGO but had no effect on the renal and superior mesenteric vasoconstrictions, although the hindquarter vasodilation was reduced. Intravenous pretreatment with a vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist or captopril had no effect on the cardiovascular responses to DAMGO. Together, these results indicate that the hypertension observed after injection of DAMGO into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus was secondary to alpha adrenoceptor-mediated vasoconstrictions in renal and superior mesenteric vascular beds and to beta adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilation in the hindquarter vascular bed, whereas the involvement of circulating vasopressin or angiotensin seems less obvious from the present findings. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that nonadrenergic, nonvasopressinergic and nonangiotensinergic vasoconstrictor mechanisms were acting in the renal and superior mesenteric vascular beds.     

Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 regulates oral tolerance induction by inhibition of T helper cell 1-related cytokines

Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) choline (50-150 microg) increased blood pressure and decreased heart rate in spinal cord transected, hypotensive rats. Choline administered intraperitoneally (60 mg/kg), also, increased blood pressure, but to a lesser extent. The pressor response to i.c.v. choline was associated with an increase in plasma vasopressin. Mecamylamine pretreatment (50 microg; i.c.v.) blocked the pressor, bradycardic and vasopressin responses to choline (150 microg). Atropine pretreatment (10 microg; i.c.v.) abolished the bradycardia but failed to alter pressor and vasopressin responses. Hemicholinium-3 [HC-3 (20 microg; i.c.v.)] pretreatment attenuated both bradycardia and pressor responses to choline. The vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist, (beta-mercapto-beta,beta-cyclopenta-methylenepropionyl1, O-Me-Tyr2, Arg8)-vasopressin (10 microg/kg) administered intravenously 5 min after choline abolished the pressor response and attenuated the bradycardia-induced by choline. These data show that choline restores hypotension effectively by activating central nicotinic receptors via presynaptic mechanisms, in spinal shock. Choline-induced bradycardia is mediated by central nicotinic and muscarinic receptors. Increase in plasma vasopressin is involved in cardiovascular effects of choline.     

Fixation of acetabular cups without cement in total hip arthroplasty. A comparison of three different implant surfaces at a minimum duration of follow-up of five years

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the roles of brain angiotensin II and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) in the hypertensive mechanism of deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertension. METHODS: We injected 50 microg/kg CV-11 974, an angiotensin II type-1 receptors antagonist, 30 nmol/kg CNP-22, or the vehicle (artificial cerebrospinal fluid) into the cerebral ventricle or intravenously 5 min before the intracerebroventricular infusion of 1.5 mol/I NaCl solution for 30 min into either male normotensive Wistar rats or DOCA-salt hypertensive rats anesthetized with urethane, and their arterial pressures and heart rates were continuously recorded. Blood (2 ml) was collected at the end of the infusion for the measurement of plasma concentration of arginine vasopressin. We infused 10 or 50 microg/kg per day CV-11 974, 10 or 50 nmol/kg per day CNP-22, or the vehicle (1 microl/h) into the cerebral ventricles of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats for 7 days by using osmotic minipumps, and measured their systolic arterial pressures, pulse rates, and urinary excretions of vasopressin. RESULTS: Intracerebroventricular pre-administrations of CV-11 974 and of CNP-22 inhibited increases in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and plasma vasopressin concentration induced by intracerebroventricular infusion of 1.5 mol/l NaCl into normotensive rats; increases in hemodynamics and plasma level of vasopressin induced by intracerebroventricular infusion of 1.5 mol/l NaCl were suppressed by intracerebroventricular pre-injections of CV-11 974, but not of CNP-22, into DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. Continuous intracerebroventricular infusions of 50 microg/kg per day CV-11 974 attenuated hypertension in DOCA-salt treated rats, accompanied by a reduction in urinary excretion of vasopressin. Continuous intracerebroventricular infusions of 50 nmol/kg per day CNP-22, however, affected neither hypertension nor urinary excretion of vasopressin in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. CONCLUSION: Brain angiotensin II could play a role in the pressor mechanism of DOCA-salt hypertension by increasing release of vasopressin via type 1 receptors. That brain CNP has an inhibitory effect on release of vasopressin in acute experiments indicates that the impairment of this inhibitory effect of brain CNP on secretion of vasopressin could be involved in the pathogenesis of DOCA-salt hypertension in rats.     

Central pathology review in clinical trials for patients with malignant glioma. A Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-02

We previously described delayed pressor response (DPR) 3 h after endothelin (ET)-1 injection in normotensive rats. In the current study, we examined effects of the ETA receptor antagonist BQ123 (0.01 mumol/kg/min intravenously, i.v.), phosphoramidon (100 mumol/kg i.v.), the neutral endopeptidase inhibitor SQ28603 (112 mumol/kg + 0.04 mumol/kg/min i.v.), the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalaprilat (10 mumol/kg i.v.), and the thromboxane receptor antagonist, SQ29548 (0.5 mumol/kg + 0.5 mumol/kg/h i.v.) on DPR. Vehicle and ET-1 (1.0 nmol/kg i.v.) were administered on day 1; vehicle or drug and ET-1 were administered on day 2. BQ123 inhibited DPR 36% (vehicle 44 +/- 5, BQ123 28 +/- 3 mm Hg); phosphoramidon inhibited DPR 56% (vehicle 45 +/- 4, and phosphoramidon 20 +/- 5 mm Hg). DPR was unchanged after SQ28603 (vehicle 39 +/- 2 and SQ28603 44 +/- 2 mm Hg), enalaprilat (vehicle 39 +/- 2 and enalaprilat 38 +/- 7 mm Hg), or SQ29548 (vehicle 46 +/- 6 and SQ29548 43 +/- 3 mm Hg). The results suggest that DPR 3 h after ET-1 injection in rats is mediated in part through ETA receptors. DPR does not appear to involve thromboxane or synthesis of angiotensin II (AII), but may be related to synthesis of ET-1.     

Mediation of endothelin-1-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation via the ETB receptor

1. The effects of FR139317 (ETA antagonist) or PD145065 (non-selective ETA/ETB antagonist) on endothelin-1 (ET-1)-induced changes in blood pressure and inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation were investigated in the anaesthetized rabbit. 2. ET-1 (1 nmol kg-1, i.a. bolus) caused a sustained increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) (peak increase 47 +/- 5 mmHg, n = 8). Intravenous infusion of FR139317 at 0.2 (n = 4) or 0.6 mg kg-1 min-1 (n = 4) inhibited the ET-1 pressor response by 83 or 89%, respectively. Infusion of PD145065 at 0.2 (n = 4) or 0.6 mg kg-1 min-1 (n = 4) inhibited the ET-1-induced increase in MAP by 79 or 75%, respectively. 3. The transient depressor response (-16 +/- 3 mmHg) which preceded the rise in blood pressure induced by ET-1 (1 nmol kg-1, i.a., n = 8) was enhanced by an intravenous infusion of FR139317 (0.6 mg kg-1 min-1) to -35 +/- 5 mmHg (P < 0.05, n = 4). This enhancement was abolished by indomethacin (5 mg kg-1, i.v.) pretreatment (-17 +/- 1 mmHg, n = 4). PD145065 (0.2 mg kg-1 min-1, i.v.) attenuated the ET-1-induced fall in blood pressure to -9 +/- 1 mmHg (n = 4), while a higher dose of this antagonist (0.6 mg kg-1 min-1, i.v.) completely abolished the ET-1-mediated depressor response. 4. ET-1 (1 nmol kg-1, n = 8) inhibited ex vivo platelet aggregation by 96% at 5 min after injection of the peptide. FR139317 (0.2 or 0.6 mg kg-1 min-1, i.v.) or PD145065 (0.2mg kg-1 min-1, i.v.) did not affect the inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation in response to ET-1. In contrast, intravenous infusion of PD145065 (0.6 mg kg-1 min-1) abolished the anti-aggregatory effects of ET-1.5. Thus, FR139317 inhibits the pressor, but not the depressor actions of ET-1 and has no effect on the ET-l-induced inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation. In contrast, PD145065 antagonizes the pressor and depressor responses to ET-1 and abolishes the anti-aggregatory effects of the peptide.6. These results strongly suggest that ET-1-induced vasoconstriction in the anaesthetized rabbit is primarily mediated via the ETA receptor while the depressor and antiaggregatory actions of ET-1 are due to activation of the ETB receptor.     

Role of the brain renin-angiotensin system in the maintenance of blood pressure in conscious spontaneously hypertensive and sinoaortic baroreceptor-denervated rats

1. Evidence suggesting an involvement of the brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the development/maintenance of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) relies, in part, on early experimental data reporting centrally mediated antihypertensive effects of saralasin. However, recent data using non-peptide AT1 receptor antagonists does not always support this theory because these compounds usually do not lower blood pressure when given centrally. 2. In the present study we have re-assessed the central effects of saralasin in conscious SHR as well as in sinoaortic baroreceptor-denervated (SAD) rats. Both of these models exhibit heightened sensitivity to the central pressor effects of angiotensin II (AngII) and, thus, any potential antihypertensive activity would provide functional evidence of activated brain RAS mechanisms in these models. 3. In SHR, saralasin failed to lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) when given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) as bolus or infusion doses that blocked the centrally mediated pressor effect of AngII. 4. In SAD rats, there was a marked impairment of the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex function and enhanced centrally mediated pressor responses to AngII. However, i.c.v. saralasin infusions again did not alter MAP. 5. Collectively, these results suggest that the central RAS is not involved in the maintenance of MAP in SHR and SAD rats, both of which are models exhibiting a functional hyperresponsiveness to AngII.     

Restoration of blood pressure by choline treatment in rats made hypotensive by haemorrhage

1. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of choline (25-150 micrograms) increased blood pressure in rats made acutely hypotensive by haemorrhage. Intraperitoneal administration of choline (60 mg kg-1) also increased blood pressure, but to a lesser extent. Following i.c.v. injection of 25 micrograms or 50 micrograms of choline, heart rate did not change, while 100 micrograms or 150 micrograms i.c.v. choline produced a slight and short lasting bradycardia. Choline (150 micrograms) failed to alter the circulating residual volume of blood in haemorrhaged rats. 2. The pressor response to i.c.v. choline (50 micrograms) in haemorrhaged rats was abolished by pretreatment with mecamylamine (50 micrograms, i.c.v.) but not atropine (10 micrograms, i.c.v.). The pressor response to choline was blocked by pretreatment with hemicholinium-3 (20 micrograms, i.c.v.). 3. The pressor response to i.c.v. choline (150 micrograms) was associated with a several fold increase in plasma levels of vasopressin and adrenaline but not of noradrenaline and plasma renin. 4. The pressor response to i.c.v. choline (150 micrograms) was not altered by bilateral adrenalectomy, but was attenuated by systemic administration of either phentolamine (10 mg kg-1) or the vasopressin antagonist [beta-mercapto-beta,beta-cyclopenta-methylenepropionyl1, O-Me-Tyr2,Arg8]-vasopressin (10 micrograms kg-1). 5. It is concluded that the precursor of acetylcholine, choline, can increase and restore blood pressure in acutely haemorrhaged rats by increasing central cholinergic neurotransmission. Nicotinic receptor activation and an increase in plasma vasopressin and adrenaline level appear to be involved in this effect of choline.     

Role of thromboxane and angiotensin in cyclosporine-induced renal vasoconstriction in the dog

Cyclosporine is associated with renal insufficiency characterized by a reduction in glomerular filtration rate that may result from renal vasoconstriction. Injection of cyclosporine in the isolated renal artery perfused at a constant flow induces a potent dose-dependent vasoconstriction of renal arterial vessels in the dog. The present study was designed to investigate the role of thromboxane A2, angiotensin, and endothelial-dependent vasodilation in the cyclosporine-induced renal vasoconstriction. A specific thromboxane A2-receptor antagonist (pinane-thromboxane A2), administered at a dose of 150 micrograms, significantly decreased the renal vasoconstriction response to cyclosporine from 103 +/- 26 mm Hg to 45 +/- 11 mm Hg (p < 0.05), with cyclosporine serum levels at the end of injection averaging 382 +/- 105 and 421 +/- 150 nmol/L before and after injection of the antagonist. In contrast, pharmacologic blockade of angiotensin receptors by saralasin had no effect on the cyclosporine arterial vasoconstriction in the kidney. The endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine was not modified during cyclosporine injection. Thus cyclosporine renal vasoconstriction appears independent of the renin-angiotensin system and of endothelium-dependent vasodilation. It is at least partly mediated by thromboxane A2. Prevention of cyclosporine vasoconstriction by thromboxane A2-receptor antagonist may likely be possible, with more potent agents having more affinity to thromboxane A2 renal receptors.     

Renal vascular responses to angiotensin II in conscious spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats

It has been postulated that exaggerated renal sensitivity to angiotensin II may be involved in the development and maintenance of hypertension in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). The purpose of this study was to compare the renal vascular responses to short-term angiotensin II infusions (50 ng/kg/min, i.v.) in conscious SHRs and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. Renal cortical blood flow was measured in conscious rats by using quantitative renal perfusion imaging by magnetic resonance, and blood pressure was measured by an indwelling carotid catheter attached to a digital blood pressure analyzer. Renal vascular responses to angiotensin II were similar in control SHRs and WKY rats. Pretreatment with captopril to block endogenous production of angiotensin II significantly augmented the renal vascular response to exogenous angiotensin II in the SHRs but not in the WKY rats. The renal vascular responses to angiotensin II were significantly greater in captopril-pretreated SHRs than in WKY rats (cortical blood flow decreased by 1.66 +/- 0.13 ml/min/g cortex in WKY rats compared with 2.15 +/- 0.14 ml/min/g cortex in SHR; cortical vascular resistance increased by 10.5 +/- 1.4 mm Hg/ml/min/g cortex in WKY rats compared with 15.6 +/- 1.7 mm Hg/ml/min/g cortex in SHRs). Responses to angiotensin II were completely blocked in both strains by pretreatment with the angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonist losartan. Results from this study in conscious rats confirm previous findings in anesthetized rats that (a) the short-term pressor and renal vascular responses to angiotensin II are mediated by the AT1 receptor in both SHRs and WKY rats, and (b) the renal vascular responses to angiotensin II are enhanced in SHRs compared with WKY rats when endogenous production of angiotensin II is inhibited by captopril pretreatment.     

Lack of effect of a selective vasopressin V1A receptor antagonist SR 49,059, on potentiation by vasopressin of adrenoceptor-mediated pressor responses in the rat mesenteric arterial bed

The vasopressin receptor subtype involved in the enhancement by vasopressin of adrenoceptor-mediated vasoconstriction was investigated in rat isolated perfused mesenteric arteries. [Arg8]vasopressin (1-10 nM) dose-dependently increased the perfusion pressure and enhanced the pressor response to the adrenoceptor agonist methoxamine (40 nmol) or electrical stimulation of periarterial nerves (16 Hz), at the concentration of 10 nM of [Arg8]vasopressin up to 4 and 3 fold, respectively. During prolonged exposure (45 min) the direct vasoconstrictor effect of [Arg8]vasopressin (10 nM) rapidly declined whereas the potentiation of methoxamine-induced vasoconstriction was maintained. The selective vasopressin V1A receptor antagonist SR 49,059 (1-3 nM) and the non-selective V1A/B and oxytocin receptor antagonist [deamino-Pen1,Tyr(Me)2,Arg8]vasopressin (15-45 nM) inhibited the direct vasoconstrictor action of [Arg8]vasopressin but had no effect on the enhancement of the pressor response to methoxamine or electrical stimulation. The V1B receptor agonist [deamino-Cys1,beta-(3-pyridyl)-D-Ala2,Arg8]vasopressin (100-1000 nM) and the V2 receptor agonist [deamino-Cys1,D-Arg8]vasopressin (1-10 nM) were devoid of any pressor activity and did not potentiate methoxamine-evoked vasoconstriction. In contrast, [1-triglycyl,Lys8]vasopressin (100 - 1000 nM) potentiated the methoxamine responses without per se inducing vasoconstriction. In arteries precontracted with methoxamine (7.5 microM) pressor responses to [Arg8]vasopressin (3-10 nM) were not inhibited by a dose of SR 49,059 (3 nM) which abolished the peptide's vasoconstrictor effect under control conditions. These data show that the direct vasoconstrictor effect of [Arg8]vasopressin is mediated by V1A receptors while the enhancement of adrenoceptor-mediated pressor responses is insensitive to V1A, V1B, and oxytocin receptor antagonists and is not mimicked by selective agonists of V1B and V2 receptors. In conclusion, an unusual interaction of vasopressin with V1A receptors, or even the existence of a novel receptor subtype, has to be considered.     

Inhibition of neutral endopeptidase causes vasoconstriction of human resistance vessels in vivo

BACKGROUND: Neutral endopeptidase (NEP) degrades vasoactive peptides, including the natriuretic peptides, angiotensin II, and endothelin-1. Systemic inhibition of NEP does not consistently lower blood pressure, even though it increases natriuretic peptide concentrations and causes natriuresis and diuresis. We therefore investigated the direct effects of local inhibition of NEP on forearm resistance vessel tone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four separate studies were performed, each with 90-minute drug infusions. In the first study, 10 healthy subjects received a brachial artery infusion of the NEP inhibitor candoxatrilat (125 nmol/min), which caused a slowly progressive forearm vasoconstriction (12+/-2%; P=0.001). In a second two-phase study, 6 healthy subjects received, 4 hours after enalapril (20 mg) or placebo, an intra-arterial infusion of the NEP inhibitor thiorphan (30 nmol/min). Thiorphan caused similar degrees of local forearm vasoconstriction (P=0.6) after pretreatment with both placebo (13+/-1%, P=0.006) and enalapril (17+/-6%, P=0.05). In a third three-phase study, 8 healthy subjects received intra-arterial thiorphan (30 nmol/min), the endothelin ETA antagonist BQ-123 (100 nmol/min), and both combined. Thiorphan caused local forearm vasoconstriction (13+/-1%, P=0.0001); BQ-123 caused local vasodilatation (33+/-3%, P=0.0001). Combined thiorphan and BQ-123 caused vasodilatation (32+/-1%, P=0.0001) similar to BQ-123 alone (P=0.98). In a fourth study, 6 hypertensive patients (blood pressure >160/100 mm Hg) received intra-arterial thiorphan (30 nmol/min). Thiorphan caused a slowly progressive forearm vasoconstriction (10+/-2%, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of local NEP causes vasoconstriction in forearm resistance vessels of both healthy volunteers and patients with hypertension. The lack of effect of ACE inhibition on the vasoconstriction produced by thiorphan and its absence during concomitant ETA receptor blockade suggest that it is mediated by endothelin-1 and not angiotensin II. These findings may help to explain the failure of systemic NEP inhibition to lower blood pressure.     

An inhibitor of lymphocyte proliferation produced by a human colonic adenocarcinoma cell line in culture

1. The relative ability of the renal and femoral vascular beds to remove infused angiotensin II and noradrenaline was examined in anaesthetized greyhounds. 2. The degree of extraction of infused drug by each vascular bed was expressed as a percentage, calculated by comparing the pressor response to intra-arterial infusion with that obtained when the same dose was administered by the intravenous route. 3. When compared with the same dose given intravenously, the pressor responses after renal artery administration of angiotensin II were reduced by a mean of 77.8 +/- 4.1% (mean +/- SEM, n = 12), whereas those after femoral artery infusions at the same dose were reduced by a mean of only 27.2 +/- 4.9% (n = 12). 4. The pattern of extraction seen with noradrenaline infusions administered in a similar manner was the reverse of that with angiotensin II. There was a 28.9 +/- 6.8% (n = 7) reduction in pressor responses to renal artery infusions; in contrast, femoral artery infusions of the same dose exhibited a 99.0 +/- 1.0% (n = 7) reduction in the pressor responses. 5. Local arterial administration of the angiotensin II competitive antagonist, [Sar1,Ile8]angiotensin II, potentiated the systemic pressor responses to renal artery infusions of angiotensin II, but not those to femoral artery infusions. 6. It is suggested that the marked ability of the renal vascular bed to remove circulating angiotensin II may, in part, involve receptor-binding, although this seems not to be the case in the femoral vascular bed.     

Mechanisms underlying the decrease in circulating angiotensin II concentration after sodium loading

1. Acute sodium loading causes a rapid decrease in the circulating concentration of angiotensin II (AngII), which is apparent from 5 min after sodium administration. This could result from an increase in AngII catabolism and/or a decrease in AngII synthesis/secretion. However, the major determinant of AngII synthesis is thought to be a change in plasma renin activity, which occurs over a longer time frame (15 min). 2. To investigate the mechanisms underlying the rapid decrease in plasma AngII engendered by sodium administration, we performed metabolic clearance studies in male New Zealand white rabbits before and after a hypertonic sodium load of 1.5 mmol/kg as 0.513 mol/L saline i.v. bolus. 3. The metabolic clearance rate of AngII increased significantly from 42.2 +/- 9.0 mL/min per kg before sodium to 110.8 +/- 33.7 mL/min per kg after sodium administration (P < 0.05). The calculated or theoretical secretion rate decreased from 1470.7 +/- 404.2 to 573.5 +/- 139.5 fmol/min per kg (P < 0.025) in response to sodium. 4. We conclude that an increase in AngII metabolism and a decrease in synthesis/secretion contribute to the reduction in circulating AngII, which occurs in the first 60-90 min after sodium loading.     

An extension of Satterthwaite''s approximation applied to pharmacokinetics

Central inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 150 microg/5 microl) to conscious rats produced a biphasic pressor response characterized by an initial transient increase within 5 min, and a delayed response starting between 60-90 min. The effect was stereospecific, as D-NAME (250 microg/5 microl) did not modify the resting arterial blood pressure, nor did L-arginine (323 microg/5 microl, i.c.v.), indicating the substrate for NOS is not rate-limiting. Intracerebroventricular pretreatment with losartan (25 microg/5 microl), a non-peptide antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor subtype, or indomethacin (100 microg/5 microl), a blocker of cyclooxygenase, however, prevented the initial increase in blood pressure without affecting the delayed pressor response. In contrast, neither intravenous losartan (10 mg/kg b.wt) nor prazosin, an alpha1 adrenergic receptor antagonist, at doses of 5 microg/5 microl (i.c.v.) or 0.3 mg/kg b.wt (i.v.) were effective in altering the pressor responses. These results indicate that centrally produced NO maintains the resting arterial blood pressure at least partially through modulation of the brain angiotensin system and prostaglandins.     

Breakdown of blood pressure and body fluid homeostasis in heart transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate disturbances in arterial blood pressure and body fluid homeostasis in stable heart transplant recipients. BACKGROUND: Hypertension and fluid retention frequently complicate heart transplantation. METHODS: Blood pressure, renal and endocrine responses to acute volume expansion were compared in 10 heart transplant recipients (57 +/- 9 years old [mean +/- SD]) 20 +/- 5 months after transplantation, 6 liver transplant recipients receiving similar doses of cyclosporine (cyclosporine control group) and 7 normal volunteers (normal control subjects). After 3 days of a constant diet containing 87 mEq/24 h of sodium, 0.154 mol/liter saline was infused at 8 ml/kg per h for 4 h. Blood pressure and plasma vasopressin, angiotensin II, aldosterone, atrial natiuretic peptide and renin activity levels were determined before and at 30, 60, 120 and 240 min during the infusion. Urine was collected at 2 and 4 h. Blood pressure, fluid balance hormones and renal function were monitored for 48 h after the infusion. RESULTS: Blood pressure did not change in the two control groups but increased in the heart transplant recipients (+15 +/- 8/8 +/- 5 mm Hg) and remained elevated for 48 h (p < or = 0.05). Urine flow and urinary sodium excretion increased abruptly in the control groups sufficient to account for elimination of 86 +/- 9% of the sodium load by 48 h; the increases were blunted (p < or = 0.05) and delayed in the heart transplant recipients, resulting in elimination of only 51 +/- 13% of the sodium load. Saline infusion suppressed vasopressin, renin activity, angiotensin II and aldosterone in the two control groups (p < or = 0.05) but not in the heart transplant recipients. Heart transplant recipients had elevated atrial natriuretic peptide levels at baseline (p < or = 0.05), but relative increases during the infusion were similar to those in both control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure in heart transplant recipients is salt sensitive. These patients have a blunted diuretic and natriuretic response to volume expansion that may be mediated by a failure to reflexly suppress fluid regulatory hormones. These defects in blood pressure and fluid homeostasis were not seen in liver transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine and therefore cannot be attributed to cyclosporine alone. Abnormal cardiorenal neuroendocrine reflexes, secondary to cardiac denervation, may contribute to salt-sensitive hypertension and fluid retention in heart transplant recipients.     

Nitric oxide release as an essential mitigating step in tubuloglomerular feedback: observations during intrarenal nitric oxide clamp

Nitric oxide synthase inhibition in the kidney enhances tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) responsiveness. This may reflect either the effect of reduced basal nitric oxide (NO) availability or the effect of impaired NO release that is physiologically induced by TGF activation. However, it is unknown whether the latter actually takes place. In this study, it was hypothesized that NO is released (from macula densa cells or endothelium) as part of the normal TGF loop, and mitigates the TGF response. In Sprague Dawley rats, TGF responsiveness was assessed (fall in tubular stop flow pressure, deltaSFP, upon switching loop of Henle perfusion rates from 0 to 40 nl/min) during an intrarenal NO clamp (systemic infusion of nitro-L-arginine, 10 microg/kg per min, followed by intrarenal nitroprusside infusion adjusted to restore renal blood flow [RBF]). This maneuver was presumed to fix intrarenal NO impact at a physiologic level. To validate the approach, TGF responsiveness during an intrarenal angiotensin II (AngII) clamp (systemic infusion of enalaprilat 0.2 mg/kg per min, followed by intrarenal AngII infusion) was also studied. AngII is presumed to modulate but not mediate, TGF, thus not to increase as part of the TGF loop. In untreated animals, RBF was 7.4 +/- 0.4 ml/min, and deltaSFP was 5.7 +/- 1.6 mmHg. Nitro-L-arginine infusion alone reduced RBF to 5.3 +/- 0.5 ml/min (P < 0.05); with nitroprusside infusion, RBF was restored to 8.3 +/- 0.7 ml/min. In this condition (NO clamp), deltaSFP was markedly increased to 19.6 +/- 3.2 mmHg (P < 0.05). By contrast, deltaSFP, which was virtually abolished during enalaprilat alone (0.2 +/- 0.3 mmHg), was not significantly different from controls during AngII clamp (8.2 +/- 1.0 mmHg). These data suggest that NO may well be released upon TGF activation. By contrast, AngII is not dynamically involved in TGF activation, but may modulate the TGF response. Thus, dynamic release of NO during TGF activation mitigates the TGF response, so that it will offset the action of a primary, as yet undefined, vasoconstrictor mediator. The source of this NO, macula densa or endothelium, remains to be elucidated.     

Renal effects of intracerebroventricularly injected tachykinins in the conscious saline-loaded rat: receptor characterization

1. The effects of intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) injected substance P (SP), neurokinin A (NKA) and [MePhe7]neurokinin B (NKB) were investigated on renal excretion of water, sodium and potassium in the conscious saline-loaded rat. The central effects of [MePhe7]NKB were characterized with selective tachykinin antagonists for NK1 (RP 67580), NK2 (SR 48968) and NK3 (R 820) receptors. 2. Whereas SP or NKA (65 or 650 pmol) failed to modify the renal responses, [MePhe7]NKB (65-6500 pmol) produced dose-dependent and long-lasting (30-45 min) decreases in renal excretion of water (maximal reduction at 65 pmol: from 66.14 +/- 7.62 to 21.07 +/- 3.79 microliters min-1), sodium (maximal reduction at 65 pmol: from 10.19 +/- 2.0 to 1.75 +/- 0.48 mumol min-1) and potassium (maximal reduction at 65 pmol: from 4.31 +/- 1.38 to 0.71 +/- 0.27 mumol min-1). While 650 pmol [MePhe7]NKB elevated urinary osmolality, neither 65 pmol nor 6.5 nmol [MePhe7]NKB altered this parameter. 3. Both the antidiuresis and antinatriuresis induced by [MePhe7]NKB (65 pmol) were significantly blocked by the prior i.c.v. injection of R 820 (1.3 nmol, 5 min earlier), although the potassium excretion was only partially reduced. However, R 820 did not affect the antidiuresis and antinatriuresis elicited by endothelin-1 (1 pmol, i.c.v.). On its own, R 820 decreased renal potassium excretion with no effect on urinary osmolality and renal excretion of water and sodium. The i.c.v. co-injection of RP 67580 and SR 48968 (6.5 nmol each, 5 min earlier) failed to modify the renal responses to [MePhe7]NKB in a similar study. 4. The central effects of [MePhe7]NKB (65 pmol) on renal excretion were blocked by the prior i.v. administration of a linear peptide vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist (50 micrograms kg-1, 5 min earlier). 5. These results suggest that the central NK3 receptor, probably located in the hypothalamus, is implicated in the renal control of water and electrolyte homeostasis through the release of vasopressin in the conscious saline-loaded rat.     

Effect of renal perfusion pressure on excretion of calcium, magnesium, and phosphate in the rat

Abnormalities in renal handling of calcium, magnesium, or phosphate have been implicated in the development and/or maintenance of human hypertension. We have shown recently that renal excretion of these ions is correlated to blood pressure in Dahl salt-sensitive as well as salt-resistant rats. The present study was designed to determine whether renal perfusion pressure per se could affect excretion of these ions. Urinary excretion of calcium, magnesium, and phosphate was studied in anaesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats under basal conditions and during an intravenous infusion of angiotensin II (ANG II), vasopressin (AVP) or phenylephrine (PE). A cuff, placed around the aorta between the two renal arteries, allowed maintenance of normal perfusion pressure in the left kidney, while that in the right kidney was allowed to rise. Infusion of pressor agents raised mean arterial blood pressure to comparable levels (means +/- SE): ANG II (n = 7), before = 102 +/- 4, during = 133 +/- 3 mmHg, AVP (n = 8), before = 110 +/- 7, during = 136 +/- 5 mmHg, PE (n = 6), before = 111 +/- 6, during = 141 +/- 6 mmHg. Although there was no difference in excretion of calcium, magnesium and phosphate between the two kidneys under basal conditions, infusion of ANG II or PE induced hypercalciuria, hypermagnesiuria and hyperphosphaturia in the right kidney which was exposed to the increased arterial pressure. Such effects did not appear in the pressure-controlled left kidney. Infusion of AVP was associated with reduced excretion of calcium and magnesium, and increased excretion of phosphate, in the normotensive kidney. The response to the similarly increased renal perfusion pressure in this group was also reduced for calcium and magnesium, and enhanced for phosphate. The results indicate (1) renal excretion of calcium, magnesium and phosphate is renal perfusion pressure-dependent; the higher the renal perfusion pressure, the greater the excretion of these ions. (2) Independently of perfusion pressure, AVP can inhibit phosphate reabsorption and stimulate divalent cation reabsorption.     

Effects of long-term intrarenal angiotensin II infusion on renal vascular responsiveness to vasoactive agents

1. We tested whether chronic intrarenal angiotensin II (AngII) infusion altered renal vascular responsiveness to vasoactive agents, which would provide evidence of vascular structural changes. 2. The renal blood flow (RBF) responses to renal arterial administration of bolus doses of acetylcholine, glyceryl trinitrate, AngII and noradrenaline were measured before commencement of and 1 day after cessation of 28 days intrarenal AngII infusion (0.5 ng/kg per min) in chronically instrumented conscious dogs. 3. The RBF responses to these vasoactive agents were unaltered by chronic intrarenal AngII infusion in conscious dogs. 4. These functional studies provide no evidence for renal vascular hypertrophy in response to chronic intrarenal AngII infusion in conscious dogs.