Analysis of Pesticides in Tomato Combining QuEChERS and Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

A new sample preparation procedure combining QuEChERS and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) was optimized for the determination at trace levels of 13 pesticides from different chemical families (i.e. 2,4-D, acetamiprid, bentazone, cymoxanil, deltamethrin, dicamba, diuron, foramsulfuron, mesotrione, metalaxyl-M, methomyl, pyraclostrobin and tembotrione) in tomato by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. Target pesticides from tomato samples were isolated by liquid partitioning with acetonitrile and salts and cleaned up by dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE); the analytes were concentrated in trichloromethane by the DLLME procedure. The disperser solvent from DLLME was used at the same time as carrier of analytes form extraction in QuEChERS method. The main factors affecting sample cleanup by d-SPE in QuEChERS and DLLME yield were optimized by means of an experimental design. Under the optimum conditions, good linearity was obtained, the recoveries of pesticides in tomato samples at spiking levels between 0.01 and 1.00 mg/kg ranged from 86 to 116 % (for foramsulfuron and cymoxanil, respectively). Precision was within 15.0 % (RSD) except at the LQ for tembotrione, which was 17.4 %. Limits of quantification achieved (ranging from 0.0058 to 0.15 mg/kg) were below the maximum residue limits established by the European Union.     

Application of Fast Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry in Combination with the QuEChERS Method for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables

A fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method has been developed for multiresidue determination of up to 56 pesticides in fruits and vegetables in a chromatographic run time of <10 min, using a single quadrupole mass spectrometer operating in selected ion monitoring mode. The well-known acetate-buffering version of the QuEChERS method has been used for sample preparation. Programmable temperature vaporizer injection of 3 μL allowed reaching limits of detection between 0.15 and 15 μg/kg for most compounds in the sample matrices tested. The applicability of the method has been evaluated in apple, orange, carrot, and tomato. Recoveries at three fortification levels (0.01, 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg) ranged from 70 to 120 % for most compounds, with relative standard deviations below 20 % in all cases. The developed method has been applied to fruit and vegetable samples from different Spanish provinces.     

Determination of Triazoles in Tea Samples Using Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction Combined with Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

In this study, dispersive solid phase extraction (DSPE) combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method was developed for the determination of triazole fungicide residues in tea samples. DSPE with ODS C₁₈, primary secondary amine, and florisil as sorbents was applied to clean up and minimize matrix interference from tea samples; it was followed with the enrichment of target compounds in the DLLME procedure and detection with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The effects of various experimental parameters on the DSPE and DLLME procedures were studied systematically, such as the kinds and volume of sorbents, extraction and dispersive solvents, and extraction time. Under optimum conditions, the method was validated in a tea matrix. The matrix-matched calibration curves of three triazoles had good linearity in the range of 0.0125–50 μg kg^?1, and the linear regression coefficients (r) ranged from 0.9998 to 0.9999. The limits of quantification (S/N?=?10) for penconazole, tebuconazole, and triadimenfon were 4.0, 7.8, and 31.6 ng kg^?1, respectively. The intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations varied from 3.6 to 18.6 %. Recoveries in three concentration levels were between 91 and 118 %. The obtained results show that the proposed DSPE-DLLME-LC-MS method has the potential to analyze trace fungicides in a complex sample matrix.     

Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction for Determination of Four Parabens in Beverage Samples by Ultra-performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

In this study, a two-step extraction technique was developed for extraction and preconcentration of parabens from beverage samples using ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL-DLLME) and magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE). In this IL-DLLME followed by MSPE method, ionic liquid (IL, 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate) formed hydrophobic microdroplets in beverage samples as an extractant of parabens; after the IL-DLLME process was completed, graphene modified Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles (Fe₃O₄@G) were placed to adsorb and isolate IL from the sample solution. After the supernatant was carefully moved, acetonitrile was added to elute the IL containing parabens from Fe₃O₄@G. The experimental variables affecting the extraction procedure have been systematically studied. Under optimal conditions, the detection limits were less than 1.53 ng/mL and the linear detection ranges were 2–500 ng/mL (R ² ≥ 0.998) for these analytes. The recoveries for spiked samples were 58.8–89.2% and satisfactory precision (RSD ≤ 4.8%) were obtained.     

Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Followed by Solid-Phase Extraction Followed by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Sensitive Determination of Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos in Rice

Selectivity of solid-phase extraction (SPE) was combined with the concentration power of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) to obtain a sensitive, low solvent consumption method for high-performance liquid chromatography determination of diazinon and chlorpyrifos in rice. In this method, rice samples were extracted by ultrasound-assisted extraction followed by SPE. Then, the SPE eluent was used as a disperser solvent in the next dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction step for further purification and enrichment of diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Under the optimal conditions, the linear range was from 5.0 to 250 μg kg^?1 for diazinon and from 2.5 to 250 μg kg^?1 for chlorpyrifos. Limits of detection of diazinon and chlorpyrifos were 1.5 and 0.7 μg kg^?1, respectively. Limits of quantitation of diazinon and chlorpyrifos were 5.5 and 3.0 μg kg^?1, respectively. The precisions and recoveries also were investigated by spiking 10 μg kg^?1 concentration in rice. The recoveries obtained were over 90 % with relative standard deviation (RSD%) below 9.0 %. The new approach was utilized to successfully detect trace amounts of diazinon and chlorpyrifos in different Iranian rice samples.     

Simultaneous Determination of 69 Pesticide Residues in Coffee by Gas Chromatography?CMass Spectrometry

A method using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) combined with solid-phase extraction (SPE) cleanup followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has been established for quantitative determination of 69 pesticide residues in coffee. Based on an appraisal of the characteristics of GC-MS, validation experiments were conducted for 69 pesticides. In the method, 2.0 g samples were mixed with 5 ml water and 1 g sodium chloride and extracted with 5 ml of ethyl acetate by blender homogenization, centrifugation, and filtration. Evaporation was conducted and the sample was injected into a 250 mm × 10 mm S-X3 GPC column, with ethyl acetate–n-hexane (1:2 v/v) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 3 ml/min. The 4–15 min fraction was collected for the SPE cleanup, which was Envi-Carb SPE cartridge coupled with NH₂-LC SPE cartridge with acetone–ethyl acetate (2:5 v/v) as the eluted solvent. The eluents were collected and then evaporated to dryness, which was redissolved in 0.5 ml ethyl acetate for GC-MS analysis. For the 69 pesticides determined by GC-MS, the portions collected from GPC were concentrated to 0.5 ml and exchanged with 5 ml n-hexane. In the linear range of each pesticide, the correlation coefficient was R ² ≥ 0.99. At the low, medium, and high fortification levels of 0.05–1.0 mg/kg, recoveries fell within 60–120%. The relative standard deviation was between 1.3% and 22.3% for all 69 pesticides. The limits of detection for the method were 10 μg/kg to 150 μg/kg, depending on each pesticide.     

QuEChERS in Combination with Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Based on Solidification of Floating Organic Droplet Method for the Simultaneous Analysis of Six Fungicides in Grape

A method for simultaneous analysis of six fungicides in grape was developed by using ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method (UA-DLLME-SFO) combined with high-performance liquid chromatography equipped with UV detector (HPLC-UV). The extractant was obtained from grape samples using the modified QuEChERS (acronym of quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe) method. Then the target fungicides were rapidly transferred from the acetonitrile extract to the phase of 100 μL of 1-undecanol, which is of low density, low toxicity, and proper melting point near room temperature using UA-DLLME-SFO. Experimental parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were studied and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, recovery tests were carried out at three different concentrations. The average recoveries ranged from 72.5 % to 100.6 % with relative standard deviations of 0.8 % to 7.3 % (n?=?5). The limits of quantifications of the method for all the target fungicides varied from 0.5 to 5 mg?kg^?1, which were lower than the MRLs established by Codex Alimentarius Commission and USA. Compared with the conventional method, the proposed method is easy, fast, economic, and less toxic and avoids conventional concentration methods like rotary evaporation and nitrogen stream drying.     

Comparison of Simple and Rapid Extraction Procedures for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fruit Juices by Fast Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Three sample treatment methods, based on QuEChERS, solid-phase extraction (SPE) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME), were compared and evaluated in order to obtain the best conditions to determine pesticide residues in fruit juice by fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (single quadrupole GC-MS). Analysis were performed under selected ion monitoring, acquiring the three most abundant and/or specific ions for each analyte and using their relative intensity ratios as a confirmatory parameter. The 3 methodologies (QuEChERS, SPE and SPME) were validated taking 15 selected pesticides as model compounds, using commercial apple juice. QuEChERS procedure was based on the AOAC Official Method 2007.01, using acetonitrile (containing 1 % acetic acid) as extraction solvent and primary–secondary amine during the dispersive solid-phase extraction. Oasis hydrophilic–lipophilic balance cartridges were used for SPE, and polyacrylate fibers were used for direct immersion SPME procedure. Three isotopically labeled standards were added to the samples before extraction and used as surrogate standards. Validation parameters as recoveries, limits of detection, and limits of quantification (LOQ), as well as matrix effects and sample throughput, were obtained and compared for the three extraction procedures. QuEChERS was considered faster and led to the best quantitative results. In this way, validation was extended to up to 56 pesticides by applying QuEChERS in multi-fruit juice samples, obtaining LOQs ranging from 2 to 20 μg/L for most compounds. Accuracy and precision were evaluated by means of recovery experiments at two concentration levels (10 and 100 μg/L), obtaining recoveries between 70 and 120 % in most cases and relative standard deviations below 15 %. Finally, the QuEChERS method was applied to the analysis of commercial juices, including mango–apple, pineapple, grapefruit and orange.     

Optimized Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction and Determination of Sorbic Acid and Benzoic Acid in Beverage Samples by Gas Chromatography

A new rapid method for direct determination of trace levels of sorbic and benzoic acids was developed by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. In the proposed approach, the separation procedure of sorbic and benzoic acids was performed on a general chromatographic column without any prior derivatization processes. Some effective parameters on the microextraction recovery were studied and optimized utilizing multilevel factorial and central composite experimental designs. The best concurrent extraction efficiency acquired using ethanol and chloroform as dispersive and extraction solvents. Central composite design (CCD) resulted in the optimized values of microextraction parameters as follows: 1.0 mL of dispersive and 0.1 mL of extraction solvents, ionic salt concentration of 50 g?L^?1 at pH 4. Under optimum conditions, the calibration curve was linear over the range 0.5–20 mg L^?1. Relative standard deviation was 11% and 13% for five repeated determinations for sorbic and benzoic acids, respectively. Limits of detection were acquired as 0.2 mg L^?1 for sorbic acid and 0.5 mg L^?1 for benzoic acid. The average recoveries were 31% and 39% for sorbic and benzoic acids, respectively. The method was successfully applied to the determination of sorbic and benzoic acids as preservatives in beverage samples.     

A Miniaturized Preconcentration Method Based on Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for the Spectrophotometric Determination of Aziridine in Food Simulants

In this work a simple, rapid and sensitive method using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) combined with UV–Vis spectrophotometry has been developed for the preconcentration and determination of trace amounts of aziridine in food simulants. The method is based on derivatization of aziridine with Folin's reagent (1,2-naphthoquione-4-sulphonic acid) and extraction of color product using DLLME technique. Some important parameters, such as reaction conditions, and type and volume of extraction solvent and disperser solvent were studied and optimized. Under optimum conditions, a linear calibration curve in the range of 2.0–350 ng mL^?1 of aziridine was obtained. Detection limit based on 3S_b was 1.0 ng mL^?1, and the relative standard deviation for 50 ng mL^?1 of aziridine was 2.49c (n?=?7). The proposed method was applied for the determination of aziridine in food simulants.     

Modified QuEChERS Combination with Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction for the Determination of 16 Preservatives by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

In this paper, based on the mechanism of the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) method, a novel graphene grafted silica-coated Fe₃O₄ (Fe₃O₄@SiO₂@G) was synthesized and applied as the efficient magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) adsorbent for rapid cleanup of vegetable samples prior to analyzing 16 preservative residues by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The method, which took advantages of the novel nanoparticle adsorbent and an external magnetic field separation targets from samples, not only could avoid the time consuming of the traditional solid-phase extraction, but also could be developed for simultaneous determination of 16 preservative residues in vegetables. Various experimental parameters that could affect the extraction efficiencies have been investigated. Under the optimum conditions, 16 preservatives showed good linearity over the range of 0.02–2.00 mg/L and correlation coefficients (R ²) of 0.9946–0.9998. The limits of detections (LODs) were in the range of 0.21–11.50 μg/kg. The recoveries of 16 preservatives ranged from 78.3 to 116.7 %, and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 1.4 to 11.9 %.     

Application and Optimization of Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Followed by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for the Determination of Oleuropein and Hydroxytyrosol in Olive Pomace

In the present study, a new method based on microwave-assisted extraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (MAE–DLLME) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was proposed for the separation and determination of oleuropein (Ole) and hydroxytyrosol (HyT) from olive pomace samples. The effective factors in the MAE–DLLME process such as microwave power, extraction time, the type and volume of extraction, and dispersive solvents were studied and optimized with the aid of response surface methodology (RSM) based on a central composite design (CCD) to obtain the best condition for Ole and HyT extraction. At the optimized conditions, parameter values were 220 W microwave power, 12 min extraction time, 60 μL extracting solvent, and 500 μL dispersive solvent. The calibration graphs of the proposed method were linear in the range of 10–500,000 μg L^?1, with the coefficient of determination (R²) higher than 0.99 for Ole and HyT. Repeatability of the method, described as the relative standard deviation (RSD), was 4.12–5.63% (n?=?6). The limits of detection were 35 and 20 μg L^?1 for Ole and HyT, respectively. The recoveries of these compounds in the spiked olive pomace sample were from 93 to 98%. The proposed method, MAE–DLLME–HPLC–UV, was an accurate, rapid, and reliable method when compared with previous methods.     

Ultra-Trace Determination of Co (ІІ) in Real Samples Using Ion Pair-Based Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Followed by Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

Ion pair-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction technique was used for preconcentration and determination of ultra-trace levels of Co (??) followed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS). Thiocyanate (SCN^?) forms an anionic complex with Co (??) followed by addition of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) as a positive counterion to produce hydrophobic cobalt-thiocyanate-CPC complex. The resulting hydrophobic complex was extracted into the fine droplets of carbon tetrachloride by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME). In DLLME, a mixture of 1.5 mL of acetone (as disperser solvent) containing 40 μL of carbon tetrachloride (as extraction solvent) was rapidly injected into the sample solution to extract the hydrophobic cobalt-thiocyanate-CPC complex. Under the optimum conditions, the calibration curve was linear in the range of 0.08–1.5 μg L^?1 of Co (??) with a correlation coefficient of 0.9997. The relative standard deviation (RSD, %) based on six replicate analyses of 0.5 μg L^?1 of Co (??) was 3.7 %, and the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.02 μg L^?1. The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated by the analysis of a certified reference material and spike method. The proposed method was successfully applied for determination of ultra-trace levels of Co (??) in different water samples and spinach leaves.     

Development of a Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Method for the Determination of α-Tocopherol in Pigmented Wheat by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) method coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography was developed for the analysis of α-tocopherol in grain samples. The DLLME parameters including the type and volume of extractants, the volume of disperser and the addition of salt were examined. The optimized DLLME procedure consisted in the formation of a cloudy solution promoted by the fast addition to the sample (5 mL of saponified sample solution diluted with 5 mL of water) of a mixture of carbon tetrachloride (extraction solvent, 80 μL) and ethanol (dispersive solvent, 200 μL) without the addition of salt, followed by shaking for 5 min and centrifuging for 3 min at 5,000 rpm. Intra- and inter-day repeatability expressed as % RSD were 3.5 and 7.6 %, respectively. The limit of detection and the limit of quantification were 1.9 and 6.3 μg?L^?1. The comparison of this method with the national standardized extraction method, supercritical carbon dioxide extraction, accelerated solvent extraction, and conventional heat-reflux extraction indicates that the DLLME was accurate (no significant differences at the 0.05 % probability level), high efficient, low organic solvent-consuming, and low cost. This procedure was successfully applied to 42 samples of 14 types of purple wheat, for which the content of α-tocopherol exhibited a significantly negative correlation with the pigment content measured by a spectrophotometer. The recovery rates ranged from 90.5 to 103.7 %.     

QuEChERS Method for the Determination of 3‑Alkyl‑2‑Methoxypyrazines in Wines by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

A new method for determining 3-isopropyl-2-methoxypyrazine, 3-sec-butyl-2-methoxypyrazine, and 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine in wines is presented. A modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) were used for sample preparation and compound determination, respectively. The analytes were extracted from wine (30 mL) with 1 mL toluene, in the presence of 12 g anhydrous MgSO₄ and 3 g NaCl. Cleanup of the toluene phase was performed by a miniaturized dispersive solid-phase extraction with a combination of anhydrous CaCl₂ (25 mg), anhydrous MgSO₄ (25 mg), and primary-secondary amine (10 mg), which was effective for minimizing co-extractives and matrix effects. GC-MS parameters were also tuned up to optimize limits of detection between 4.2 and 7.1 ng L^?1. The overall recoveries (trueness) of the method ranged between 71 and 87 % for the white and red wine samples, respectively, spiked at 40 and 100 ng L^?1, with relative standard deviations below 21 %. The method was applied for the determination of target methoxypyrazines in the samples of commercial wines from Argentina.     

Determination of Sulfite in Water and Dried Fruit Samples by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Combined with UV–Vis Fiber Optic Linear Array Spectrophotometry

A simple and rapid dispersive liquid?Cliquid microextraction (DLLME) method was applied to preconcentrate sulfite ions from aqueous samples as a prior step to its determination by fiber optic-linear array detection spectrophotometry. The procedure is based on the color reaction of sulfite with o-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) in the presence of ammonia to form isoindole and extraction of the formed isoindole derivative using the DLLME technique. The conditions for the microextraction performance were investigated and optimized. The calibration graph was linear in the range of 2?C100???g?L^?1with a detection limit of 0.2???g?L^?1. The relative standard deviation for five replicate measurements of 10 and 50???g?L^?1of sulfite were 2.8 and 2.0?%, respectively. Under the optimized conditions, the enrichment factor of ~133 was obtained from a sample volume of 10?mL. The proposed method was successfully applied to the sulfite determination in drinking water and in food samples.     

Evaluation of Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction–HPLC–UV for Determination of Deoxynivalenol (DON) in Wheat Flour

A fast and simple method for the extraction of deoxynivalenol (DON) from wheat flour using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography–UV detection has been developed and compared with immunoaffinity column cleanup (IAC) process. The influence of several important parameters on the extraction efficacy was studied. Under optimized conditions, a linear calibration curve was obtained in the range of 50–1,000 μg/L. Average recoveries of DON from spiked wheat samples at levels of 500 μg/kg for DLLME and IAC ranged from 72.9?±?1.6 and 85.5?±?3.1, respectively. A good correlation was found for spiked samples between DLLME and IAC methods. The limit of detection was 125 and 50 μg/kg for DLLME and IAC method, respectively. Advantages of DLLME method with respect to the IAC have been pointed out.     

A Rapid Quantification of β-Carotene in Fruits and Vegetables by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction Coupled with UV–Vis Spectrophotometry: Optimized by Response Surface Methodology

A simple, fast, and efficient method consisted of optimized dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) followed by UV–vis spectrophotometry was developed for determination of β-carotene in fruits and vegetables. Chloroform and methanol were chosen as extraction and disperser solvents, respectively. The extraction process was optimized using a central composite design (CCD) with the optimum points of 115 μL for volume of extraction solvent and 6.5 % (w/v) for salt concentration. Under the optimal conditions, the relative standard deviation (RSD, C?=?500 μg L^?1, n?=?5), limit of detection (LOD), linear dynamic range (LDR), and coefficient of determination (R²) were 1.08 %, 2 μg L^?1, 50–1,500 μg L^?1, and 0.991, respectively. The present method consisted of a simple and fast sample preparation procedure without any antioxidant addition, saponification, and purification was used.     

Application of Matrix Solid-Phase Dispersion and Liquid Chromatography–Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Fruits

This study presents an application of rapid and sensitive multiresidue method for the analysis of acephate, acetamipride, atrazine, carbendazim, carbaryl, carbofuran, dimethoate, imidacloprid, linuron, malathion, monocrotophos, monuron, propazine, simazine, and tebufenozide in fruits. The method involves an extraction procedure based on matrix solid-phase dispersion using diatomaceous earth as a dispersant and dichloromethane as the eluent. The target pesticides were determined using liquid chromatography–ion trap mass spectrometry. Quantification of the analytes was carried out using the most sensitive ion transition. Ion trap parameters, like activation q and time, were found to have a prominent influence on method sensitivity for some pesticides and they were optimized accordingly. The confirmation of residues detected in real samples was performed by repeated injection and acquiring additional ion transitions besides the ones used for quantification. The method was validated for accuracy, linearity, reproducibility, and sensitivity. Mean values for recoveries were in the range of 70–120 % for all tested matrices. Repeatability of the method, expressed as the relative standard deviation, was in general lower than 20 %. The applicability of the method to routine analysis was tested in real fruit samples with good performance.     

Determination of Six Paraben Residues in Fresh-cut Vegetables Using QuEChERS with Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

In this study, an optimized QuEChERS sample preparation method was developed to analyze residues of six parabens: methyl-, ethyl-, n-propyl-, isopropyl-, n-butyl-, and isobutylparaben in five fresh-cut vegetables (potato, broccoli, carrot, celery, and cabbage) with high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS). Homogenized samples were extracted using acetonitrile, and the extracts were cleaned with the novel sorbent multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). MWCNTs provided 84–94% removal of chlorophyll and lower matrix effects (MEs) compared to commonly used primary-secondary-amine (PSA) sorbent. Selected parabens were separated by HPLC with isocratic elution using acetonitrile and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid solution and determined by triple quadrupole MS/MS. The method validation results showed that recoveries were at 70–120% with RSDs <20%. Calibration curves showed linear responses of six parabens with R ² > 0.99. Fifty fresh-cut vegetable samples from different farmer markets in Beijing, China were collected to measure the paraben residues, and only one sample was tested positive with methylparaben concentration at 81 μg/kg.