Response of Laterally Loaded Large-Diameter Bored Pile Groups

This paper presents results of full-scale lateral load tests of one single pile and three pile groups in Hong Kong. The test piles, which are embedded in superficial deposits and decomposed rocks, are 1.5 m in diameter and approximately 30 m long. The large-diameter bored pile groups consist of one two-pile group at 6 D (D = pile diameter) spacing and one two-pile and one three-pile group at 3 D spacing. This paper aims to investigate the nonlinear response of laterally loaded large-diameter bored pile groups and to study design parameters for large-diameter bored piles associated with the p-y method using a 3 D finite-element program, FLPIER. Predictions using soil parameters based on published correlations and back-analysis of the single-pile load test are compared. It is found that a simple hyperbolic representation of load-deflection curves provides an objective means to determine ultimate lateral load capacity, which is comparable with the calculated values based on Broms' theory. Lateral deflections of bored pile groups predicted using the values of the constant of horizontal subgrade reaction, suggested by Elson and obtained from back-analysis of the single pile load test, are generally in good agreement with the measurements, especially at low loads.     

Centrifuge Model Study of Laterally Loaded Pile Groups in Clay

A series of centrifuge model tests has been conducted to examine the behavior of laterally loaded pile groups in normally consolidated and overconsolidated kaolin clay. The pile groups have a symmetrical plan layout consisting of 2, 2×2, 2×3, 3×3, and 4×4 piles with a center-to-center spacing of three or five times the pile width. The piles are connected by a solid aluminum pile cap placed just above the ground level. The pile load test results are expressed in terms of lateral load–pile head displacement response of the pile group, load experienced by individual piles in the group, and bending moment profile along individual pile shafts. It is established that the pile group efficiency reduces significantly with increasing number of piles in a group. The tests also reveal the shadowing effect phenomenon in which the front piles experience larger load and bending moment than that of the trailing piles. The shadowing effect is most significant for the lead row piles and considerably less significant for subsequent rows of trailing piles. The approach adopted by many researchers of taking the average performance of piles in the same row is found to be inappropriate for the middle rows, of piles for large pile groups as the outer piles in the row carry significantly more load and experience considerably higher bending moment than those of the inner piles.     

Numerical Analysis of Laterally Loaded 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 Pile Groups in Sands

The coupled bridge foundation-superstructure finite-element code FLPIER was employed to predict the lateral response of the single piles and 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 pile groups founded in both loose and medium dense sands. The p-multiplier factors suggested by McVay et al. for laterally loaded pile groups with multiple pile rows were implemented for the predictions. The soil parameters were obtained through a back-analysis procedure based on single pile test results. The latter, as well as the numerical predictions of both the single and group tests, are presented. It was found that the numerical code FLPIER did an excellent job of predicting the response of both the single piles and the 3 × 3 to 7 × 3 pile groups. The latter involved the predictions of lateral load versus lateral deflection of the group, the shears and bending moments developed in the individual piles, and the distributions of the lateral loads in each pile row, which were all in good agreement with the measured results.     

Centrifuge Modeling of Torsionally Loaded Pile Groups

This paper reports a series of centrifuge model tests on torsionally loaded 1×2, 2×2, and 3×3 pile groups in sand. The objectives of the paper are to investigate: (1) the response of the pile groups subjected to torsion; (2) the way in which the applied torque is transferred in the pile groups; (3) the internal forces mobilized in these torsionally loaded pile groups and their contributions to resist the applied torque; and (4) the influence factors that affect the load transfer, such as soil density and pile-cap connection. In these model tests, the group torsional resistances of the pile groups increased monotonically in the test range of twist angles up to 8°. Both torsional and lateral resistances of the individual piles were simultaneously mobilized to resist the applied torque. The torsional resistances were substantially mobilized at small twist angles, while the lateral resistances kept increasing in the whole range of twist angles. Thus, the contribution of the torsional resistances to the applied torque decreased at large twist angles. The piles at different locations in a pile group could develop not only different horizontal displacements, but also different pile–soil–pile interactions and load–deformation coupling effect, hence, the torsional and lateral resistances of the piles are a function of pile location. The soil density had a more significant effect on the torsional resistances than on the lateral resistances of the group piles.     

Reliability of Axially Loaded Driven Pile Groups

A method was presented to evaluate the reliability of axially loaded pile groups designed using the traditional concept of group efficiency along the lines of load and resistance factor design. Group effects and system effects were identified as the major causes that led to a significantly greater observed reliability of pile foundations than calculated reliability of single piles. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate these effects based on observed pile performance. A database of pile group load tests was collected and interpreted for this purpose. Subsequently, the reliability of pile groups associated with the allowable stress design practice was calculated using the suggested method. The calculated probability of failure of pile groups was found to be one to four orders of magnitude smaller than that of single piles, depending on the significance of group effects and system effects. Finally, values of the target reliability index βTS for single piles required to achieve a specified target reliability of pile group foundations were calculated for several design methods. Due to group effects and system effects, the values of βTS should be different for single piles, a pile group, and a pile system of several groups.     

Strain Wedge Model Capability of Analyzing Behavior of Laterally Loaded Isolated Piles, Drilled Shafts, and Pile Groups

This paper demonstrates the application of the strain wedge (SW) model to assess the response of laterally loaded isolated long piles, drilled shafts, and pile groups in layered soil (sand and/or clay) and rock deposits. The basic goal of this paper is to illustrate the capabilities of the SW model versus other procedures and approaches. The SW model has been validated and verified through several comparison studies with model- and full-scale lateral load tests. Several factors and features related to the problem of a laterally loaded isolated pile and pile group are covered by the SW model. For example, the nonlinear behavior of both soil and pile material, the soil-pile interaction (i.e., the assessment of the p-y curves rather than the adoption of empirical ones), the potential of soil to liquefy, the interference among neighboring piles in a pile group, and the pile cap contribution are considered in SW model analysis. The SW model analyzes the response of laterally loaded piles based on pile properties (pile stiffness, cross-sectional shape, pile-head conditions, etc.) as well as soil properties. The SW model has the capability of assessing the response of a laterally loaded pile group in layered soil based on more realistic assumptions of pile interference as compared to techniques and procedures currently employed or proposed.     

Group Interaction Effects on Laterally Loaded Piles in Clay

This paper presents the results of static lateral load tests carried out on 1×2, 2×2, 1×4, and 3×3 model pile groups embedded in soft clay. Tests were carried out on piles with length to diameter ratios of 15, 30, and 40 and three to nine pile diameter spacing. The effects of pile spacing, number of piles, embedment length, and configuration on pile-group interaction were investigated. Group efficiency, critical spacing, and p multipliers were evaluated from the experimental study. The experimental results have been compared with those obtained from the program GROUP. It has been found that the lateral capacity of piles in 3×3 group at three diameter spacing is about 40% less than that of the single pile. Group interaction causes 20% increase in the maximum bending moment in piles of the groups with three diameter spacing in comparison to the single pile. Results indicate substantial difference in p multipliers of the corresponding rows of the linear and square pile groups. The predicted field group behavior is in good agreement with the actual field test results reported in the literature.     

Reliability Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles Involving Nonlinear Soil and Pile Behavior

An alternative approach of analyzing laterally loaded piles in the ubiquitous spreadsheet platform is presented. The numerical procedure couples nonlinear pile flexural rigidity (EpIp) with nonlinear p-y analysis. The deterministic study is then extended to carry out reliability analysis, which reflects the uncertainties and correlation structure of the underlying parameters. The reliability index is evaluated based on the alternative intuitive perspective of an expanding equivalent ellipsoid in the original space of the random variables. This paper investigates two modes of failure: deflection and bending moment, and considers non-normal random variables. Spatial variability of the soil medium is accounted for by incorporating an autocorrelation model. The spreadsheet-based reliability approach can also be coupled with stand-alone programs via the response surface method. The probabilities of failure inferred from reliability indices agree well with Monte Carlo simulations. Simple reliability-based design is demonstrated, in which the appropriate pile section or length that satisfies target reliability in one or more limit states is sought.     

Liquefaction-Induced Settlement of Pile Groups in Liquefiable and Laterally Spreading Soils

The results of a series of dynamic centrifuge tests on model pile groups in (level) liquefied and laterally spreading soil profiles are presented. The piles are axially loaded at typical working loads, which has enabled liquefaction-induced settlements of the foundations to be studied. The development of excess pore pressures within the bearing layer (dense sand) was found to lead to a reduction in pile capacity and potentially damagingly large coseismic settlements. As the excess pore pressure increased, these settlements were observed to exceed postshaking downdrag-induced settlements, which occur due to the reconsolidation of liquefied sand around the pile shaft. In resisting settlement, the pile cap was found to play an important role by compensating for the capacity lost by the piles. This was shown to be achieved by the development of dilative excess pore pressures beneath the pile cap within the underlying loose liquefied sand which provide increasing bearing capacity with settlement. The centrifuge test data show good qualitative and quantitative agreement with the limited amount of model and full-scale data currently available in the literature. The implications of settlement for the design of piled foundations to serviceability conditions in both level and sloping ground are discussed, with settlement becoming an increasingly important consideration for laterally stiffer piles. Finally, empirical relationships have been derived from the test data to relate suitable static safety factors to given increases in excess pore pressure in the bearing layer within a performance-based design framework (i.e., based on limiting displacements).     

Laterally Loaded Pile Study in Permafrost of Northern Québec, Canada

This paper describes a study undertaken at Umiujaq, in northern Québec, on laterally loaded piles in permafrost subject to a constant displacement rate. Test results of bending moments, shear load, soil reaction, and pile displacements demonstrate the complex nature of creep of frozen soils. FEM simulations show a good concurrence with field test results and confirm a clear distinction between stationary and nonstationary creep.     

Moment/Rotation Effects on Laterally Loaded Drilled Shaft Group Response

Drilled shaft groups are often designed to resist lateral loads for transportation structures. The shaft group capacity usually corresponds to a load being applied at the shaft cap level. However, in abutment wall applications, the lateral load is, in fact, applied well above the cap elevation. Thus, the load is transferred to the cap with an additional moment, causing the cap to deflect and rotate more than if this added moment were absent. As a result, the lateral capacity for a given allowable deflection of the group should be reduced because of this effect. Design engineers usually select or approve the allowable deflection at the top of the abutment wall. However, deflection at the cap level is needed to design the group capacity. The main objective of this paper is to report the results from a series of finite-element analyses on abutment wall cap configurations to study the effect of moment on the capacity of the shaft group under lateral load. A scaling factor is defined as the ratio between the group capacity for load applied at a given height above the cap and the group capacity for load applied at the bottom of the cap, and it was found to be dependent on the wall height, the spacing between shafts, and the cap deflection level, and more or less independent of the soil type, the cap thickness, and the shaft diameter. The ratio between the deflection at the top of the abutment wall and the deflection at the cap was found to be dependent on the wall stiffness (wall thickness to wall height ratio).     

Liquefaction-Induced Softening of Load Transfer between Pile Groups and Laterally Spreading Crusts

Laterally spreading nonliquefied crusts can exert large loads on pile foundations causing major damage to structures. While monotonic load tests of pile caps indicate that full passive resistance may be mobilized by displacements on the order of 1–7% of the pile cap height, dynamic centrifuge model tests show that much larger relative displacements may be required to mobilize the full passive load from a laterally spreading crust onto a pile group. The centrifuge models contained six-pile groups embedded in a gently sloping soil profile with a nonliquefied crust over liquefiable loose sand over dense sand. The nonliquefied crust layer spread downslope on top of the liquefied sand layer, and failed in the passive mode against the pile foundations. The dynamic trace of lateral load versus relative displacement between the “free-field” crust and pile cap is nonlinear and hysteretic, and depends on the cyclic mobility of the underlying liquefiable sand, ground motion characteristics, and cyclic degradation and cracking of the nonliquefied crust. Analytical models are derived to explain a mechanism by which liquefaction of the underlying sand layer causes the soil-to-pile-cap interaction stresses to be distributed through a larger zone of influence in the crust, thereby contributing to the softer load transfer behavior. The analytical models distinguish between structural loading and lateral spreading conditions. Load transfer relations obtained from the two analytical models reasonably envelope the responses observed in the centrifuge tests.     

Behavior of Axially Loaded Pile Groups Driven in Clayey Silt

This paper presents a case history describing measurements made during the installation and load testing of groups of five, closely spaced, precast concrete piles in a soft clay-silt. The test results extend the presently limited set of reported high-quality data for pile groups at field scale and allow assessment of the reliability of existing numerical and analytical predictive approaches. Full scale maintained compression and tension load tests on groups as well as tests on single (reference) piles and an individual test on a pile within a pile group enable the effects of multiple pile installations and interaction between piles under load to be assessed. The results are compared with existing simple methods of pile group analysis and with other case histories reporting results on small pile groups. A simple expression to evaluate pile group stiffness efficiency is proposed.     

Behavior of Laterally Loaded Large-Section Barrettes

A barrette is a large cross section rectangular pile. Due to dependence of the flexural stiffness of the rectangular section on its orientation and the nonlinear behavior of barrette materials, loading direction affects the lateral resistance of the barrette. Recently, full-scale lateral load tests were conducted on two barrettes in Hong Kong, one (DB1) with a cross section of 2.8 m by 0.86 m and a length of 51 m and the other (DB2) with a cross section of 2.7 m by 1.2 m and a length of approximately 30 m. This paper aims to investigate the response of laterally loaded large-section barrettes based on the load tests, to simulate the response of the two test barrettes, and to study the influence of loading direction on the lateral response of barrettes. Nonlinear p–y curves for soils and nonlinear stress–strain relations for barrette concrete and reinforcement are used to simulate the lateral response of the test barrettes considering five loading directions. The simulations were able to capture the apparently different behaviors before and after cracking of the barrette section. Sudden increases of displacement and rotation under a small lateral load increment and reduced depths of load transfer in the ground are predicted when the barrette section cracked. Based on this study, the direction of the resultant horizontal displacement is different from the loading direction if the barrette is not loaded along the major or minor axis of the cross section.     

Case History Evaluation of Laterally Loaded Piles

This paper examines seven case histories of load tests on piles or drilled shafts under lateral load. Since the current design software to estimate lateral load resistance of deep foundations requires p-y curves. The first approach used was correlative whereby soil parameters determined from in situ tests [standard penetration test (SPT) and cone penetration test (CPT)] were used as input values for standard p-y curves. In the second approach p-y curves were calculated directly from the stress deformation data measured in dilatometer (DMT) and cone pressuremeter tests. The correlative evaluation revealed that, on the average, predictions based upon the SPT were conservative for all loading levels, and using parameters from the CPT best predicted field behavior. Typically, predictions were conservative, except at the maximum load. Since traditionally SPT and CPT correlation-based p-y curves are for “sands” or “clays,” this study suggests that silts, silty sands, and clayey sands should use cohesive p-y curves. For the directly calculated curves, DMT derived p-y curves predict well at low lateral loads, but at higher load levels the predictions become unconservative. p-y curves derived from pressuremeter tests predicted well for both “sands” and “clays” where pore pressures are not anticipated.     

Theoretical Elastic-Plastic Solution for Laterally Loaded Piles

In this paper, the theoretical solutions of maximum deflection and moment for laterally loaded long piles in a uniform subgrade reaction modulus linear-plastic soil are presented. These solutions are in the form of normalized results and enable easy and exact calculation of the deflection or moment for three head loading conditions. Comparisons between the theoretical solution and a numerical solution established previously showed good agreement.     

Static Pushover Analyses of Pile Groups in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground in Centrifuge Tests

Monotonic, static beam on nonlinear Winkler foundation (BNWF) methods are used to analyze a suite of dynamic centrifuge model tests involving pile group foundations embedded in a mildly sloping soil profile that develops liquefaction-induced lateral spreading during earthquake shaking. A single set of recommended design guidelines was used for a baseline set of analyses. When lateral spreading demands were modeled by imposing free-field soil displacements to the free ends of the soil springs (BNWF_SD), bending moments were predicted within ?8% to +69 (16th to 84th percentile values) and pile cap displacements were predicted within ?6 to +38%, with the accuracy being similar for small, medium, and large motions. When lateral spreading demands were modeled by imposing limit pressures directly to the pile nodes (BNWF_LP), bending moments and cap displacements were greatly overpredicted for small and medium motions where the lateral spreading displacements were not large enough to mobilize limit pressures, and pile cap displacements were greatly underpredicted for large motions. The effects of various parameter relations and alternative design guidelines on the accuracy of the BNWF analyses were evaluated. Sources of bias and dispersion in the BNWF predictions and the issues of greatest importance to foundation performance are discussed. The results of these comparisons indicate that certain guidelines and assumptions that are common in engineering design can produce significantly conservative or unconservative BNWF predictions, whereas the guidelines recommended herein can produce reasonably accurate predictions.     

Tangent Stiffness Equations for Laterally Distributed Loaded Members

Tangent stiffness equations for a beam-column, which is subjected to either uniformly or sinusoidally distributed lateral loads, are presented. The equations have been derived by differentiating the slope-deflection equations under axial forces for a member. Thus, the tangent stiffness equations take into consideration axial forces, bowing effect, and laterally distributed loads. As a numerical example, elastic buckling behavior of parallel chord latticed beams with laterally distributed loads is investigated to compare the results obtained from the present method with those from the conventional matrix method in which the distributed loads are considered as a series of concentrated loads at additional intermediate nodes of a member. Furthermore, buckling tests were carried out to confirm the equations derived as well as to clarify the buckling behavior of space frame structures. In conclusion, it can be said that the new equations can provide a good efficient way of estimating the equilibrium paths and buckling loads. They can also lead to a significant savings in core storage and computing time required for the analysis of space frame structures.     

Note on the Interaction Factor for Two Laterally Loaded Piles

This technical note revisits the interaction factors for two piles under lateral loading by means of a rigorous analytical method. The basic idea of the approach presented is to decompose the problem into an extended elastic soil and two fictitious piles having Young’s modulus equal to the difference between the modulus of the real pile and the surrounding soil. By considering the displacement compatibility condition, the pile–soil interaction problem is found to be governed by a Fredholm equation of the second kind. The displacement and bending moment distribution along the fictitious piles, and consequently, the desired interaction factor at the pile head are obtained. Comparison with existing solutions validates the accuracy of the present formulation and confirms that the conventional interaction factor approach would exaggerate the interaction effect for long flexible piles. Some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the influences of the pile spacing, pile–soil stiffness ratio, pile slenderness ratio, and departure angle of the loading direction on the calculated results. A set of interaction factor charts is also provided.