Case History Evaluation of Laterally Loaded Piles

This paper examines seven case histories of load tests on piles or drilled shafts under lateral load. Since the current design software to estimate lateral load resistance of deep foundations requires p-y curves. The first approach used was correlative whereby soil parameters determined from in situ tests [standard penetration test (SPT) and cone penetration test (CPT)] were used as input values for standard p-y curves. In the second approach p-y curves were calculated directly from the stress deformation data measured in dilatometer (DMT) and cone pressuremeter tests. The correlative evaluation revealed that, on the average, predictions based upon the SPT were conservative for all loading levels, and using parameters from the CPT best predicted field behavior. Typically, predictions were conservative, except at the maximum load. Since traditionally SPT and CPT correlation-based p-y curves are for “sands” or “clays,” this study suggests that silts, silty sands, and clayey sands should use cohesive p-y curves. For the directly calculated curves, DMT derived p-y curves predict well at low lateral loads, but at higher load levels the predictions become unconservative. p-y curves derived from pressuremeter tests predicted well for both “sands” and “clays” where pore pressures are not anticipated.     

Load Testing and Settlement Prediction of Shallow Foundation

The purpose of this study was to critically examine insitu test methods as a means for predicting settlement of shallow foundations. Accordingly, a 1.8?m (6?ft) diameter concrete footing was statically load tested. Prior to construction, insitu [standard penetration test (SPT), cone penetration test (CPT), dilatometer (DMT), and pressuremeter (PMT)] and laboratory tests were performed to determine engineering properties of the soil. Predictions of the footing settlement were made by traditional as well as finite element methods. The results of the static load test showed settlements were over predicted by all methods. However, the traditional methods provided reasonable settlement estimates using either SPT-N or back computed CPT(N) as input. Finite element analyses using either DMT or CPT derived input parameters provided reasonable settlement estimates. Finite element analyses using SPT or PMT derived input parameters provided poor settlement estimates. The Mohr–Coulomb (elastoplastic) model, accounting for overconsolidation, provided better estimates than the hardening soil (hyperbolic-cap) model for all insitu test derived parameters.     

Estimating Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Displacements Using the Standard Penetration Test or Cone Penetration Test

A semiempirical approach to estimate liquefaction-induced lateral displacements using standard penetration test (SPT) or cone penetration test (CPT) data is presented. The approach combines available SPT- and CPT-based methods to evaluate liquefaction potential with laboratory test results for clean sands to estimate the potential maximum cyclic shear strains for saturated sandy soils under seismic loading. A lateral displacement index is then introduced, which is obtained by integrating the maximum cyclic shear strains with depth. Empirical correlations from case history data are proposed between actual lateral displacement, the lateral displacement index, and geometric parameters characterizing ground geometry for gently sloping ground without a free face, level ground with a free face, and gently sloping ground with a free face. The proposed approach can be applied to obtain preliminary estimates of the magnitude of lateral displacements associated with a liquefaction-induced lateral spread.     

Accounting for Soil Aging When Assessing Liquefaction Potential

It has been recognized that liquefaction resistance of sand increases with age due to processes such as cementation at particle contacts and increasing frictional resistance resulting from particle rearrangement and interlocking. As such, the currently available empirical correlations derived from liquefaction of young Holocene sand deposits, and used to determine liquefaction resistance of sand deposits from in situ soil indices [standard penetration test (SPT), cone penetration test (CPT), shear wave velocity test (Vs)], are not applicable for old sand deposits. To overcome this limitation, a methodology was developed to account for the effect of aging on the liquefaction resistance of old sand deposits. The methodology is based upon the currently existing empirical boundary curves for Holocene age soils and utilizes correction factors presented in the literature that comprise the effect of aging on the in situ soil indices as well as on the field cyclic strength (CRR). This paper describes how to combine currently recorded SPT, CPT, and Vs values with corresponding CRR values derived for aged soil deposits to generate new empirical boundary curves for aged soils. The method is illustrated using existing geotechnical data from four sites in the South Carolina Coastal Plain (SCCP) where sand boils associated with prehistoric earthquakes have been found. These sites involve sand deposits that are 200,000?to?450,000?years in age. This work shows that accounting for aging of soils in the SCCP yields less conservative results regarding the current liquefaction potential than when age is not considered. The modified boundary curves indicate that old sand deposits are more resistant to liquefaction than indicated by the existing empirical curves and can be used to evaluate the liquefaction potential at a specific site directly from the current in situ properties of the soil.     

Estimation of Footing Settlement in Sand

The settlement of foundations under working load conditions is an important design consideration. Well‐designed foundations induce stress‐strain states in the soil that are neither in the linear elastic range nor in the range usually associated with perfect plasticity. Thus, in order to accurately predict working settlements, analyses that are more realistic than simple elastic analyses are required. The settlements of footings in sand are often estimated based on the results of in situ tests, particularly the standard penetration test (SPT) and the cone penetration test (CPT). In this article, we analyze the load‐settlement response of vertically loaded footings placed in sands using both the finite element method with a nonlinear stress‐strain model and the conventional elastic approach. Calculations are made for both normally consolidated and heavily overconsolidated sands with various relative densities. For each case, the cone penetration resistance qc is calculated using CONPOINT, a widely tested program that allows computation of qc based on cavity expansion analysis. Based on these analyses, we propose a procedure for the estimation of footing settlement in sands based on CPT results.     

Retesting of Liquefaction and Nonliquefaction Case Histories from the 1976 Tangshan Earthquake

A field investigation was performed to retest liquefaction and nonliquefaction sites from the 1976 Tangshan earthquake in China. These sites were carefully investigated in 1978 and 1979 by using standard penetration test (SPT) and cone penetration test (CPT) equipment; however, the CPT measurements are obsolete because of the now nonstandard cone that was used at the time. In 2007, a modern cone was mobilized to retest 18 selected sites that are particularly important because of the intense ground shaking they sustained despite their high fines content and/or because the site did not liquefy. Of the sites reinvestigated and carefully reprocessed, 13 were considered accurate representative case histories. Two of the sites that were originally investigated for liquefaction have been reinvestigated for cyclic failure of fine-grained soil and removed from consideration for liquefaction triggering. The most important outcome of these field investigations was the collection of more accurate data for three nonliquefaction sites that experienced intense ground shaking. Data for these three case histories is now included in an area of the liquefaction triggering database that was poorly populated and will help constrain the upper bound of future liquefaction triggering curves.     

Validation and Application of Empirical Liquefaction Models

Empirical liquefaction models (ELMs) are the standard approach for predicting the occurrence of soil liquefaction. These models are typically based on in situ index tests, such as the standard penetration test (SPT) and cone penetration test (CPT), and are broadly classified as deterministic and probabilistic models. No objective and quantitative comparison of these models have been published. Similarly, no rigorous procedure has been published for choosing the threshold required for probabilistic models. This paper provides (1) a quantitative comparison of the predictive performance of ELMs; (2) a reproducible method for choosing the threshold that is needed to apply the probabilistic ELMs; and (3) an alternative deterministic and probabilistic ELM based on the machine learning algorithm, known as support vector machine (SVM). Deterministic and probabilistic ELMs have been developed for SPT and CPT data. For deterministic ELMs, we compare the “simplified procedure,” the Bayesian updating method, and the SVM models for both SPT and CPT data. For probabilistic ELMs, we compare the Bayesian updating method with the SVM models. We compare these different approaches within a quantitative validation framework. This framework includes validation metrics developed within the statistics and artificial intelligence fields that are not common in the geotechnical literature. We incorporate estimated costs associated with risk as well as with risk mitigation. We conclude that (1) the best performing ELM depends on the associated costs; (2) the unique costs associated with an individual project directly determine the optimal threshold for the probabilistic ELMs; and (3) the more recent ELMs only marginally improve prediction accuracy; thus, efforts should focus on improving data collection.     

Estimation of Axial Load Capacity for Bored Tapered Piles Using CPT Results in Sand

Tapered piles in comparison to cylindrical piles can be beneficial in terms of the load capacity. In this paper, estimation of the load capacity for tapered piles using cone penetration test (CPT) resistance was investigated. Fourteen calibration chamber load tests using different pile types and six CPTs were conducted under various soil conditions. From the calibration chamber test results, the total, base, and shaft load capacities were analyzed in terms of soil conditions and taper angle. To evaluate CPT-based load capacity of tapered piles, normalized base and shaft resistances were obtained from normalized unit load-settlement curves. Based on the normalized base and shaft resistances, design equations that can be used to evaluate the base and shaft resistances of tapered piles were proposed. The proposed method is valid for sands of medium to dense conditions, while it may result in unconservative predictions for loose sands. To check the accuracy of the proposed method, field load tests using both cylindrical and tapered piles were conducted and compared with the predictions using the proposed method. A simplified approach using an equivalent cylindrical pile was also investigated and compared.     

Evaluation of Cone Penetration Test-Based Settlement Prediction Methods for Shallow Foundations on Cohesionless Soils at Highway Bridge Construction Sites

The cone penetration test (CPT) method is gaining popularity in the United States as one of the premier subsurface exploration techniques. The writers previously monitored settlement behavior of spread footing foundations at five highway bridge construction sites in Ohio and evaluated the standard penetration test-based settlement prediction methods in light of the field performance data. The authors recently conducted CPT sounding at these bridge sites. In this paper, settlement behavior of five spread footings resting on cohesionless soils at two sites were predicted with the CPT-based settlement prediction methods proposed by Amar, DeBeer, Meyerhof, and Schmertmann. The results showed that the prediction methods by Schmertmann and DeBeer were both conservative but reasonably reliable in predicting the settlement of shallow foundations observed in the field.     

Assessment of Direct Cone Penetration Test Methods for Predicting the Ultimate Capacity of Friction Driven Piles

This paper evaluates the applicability of eight direct cone penetration test (CPT) methods to predict the ultimate load capacity of square precast prestressed concrete (PPC) driven friction piles. Analyses and evaluation were conducted on 35 driven friction piles of different sizes and lengths that were failed during pile load testing. The CPT methods, as well as the static α and β methods, were used to estimate the load carrying capacities of the investigated piles (QP). The Butler–Hoy method was used to determine the measured load carrying capacities from pile load tests (Qm). The pile capacities determined using the different methods were compared with the measured pile capacities obtained from the pile load tests. Four criteria were selected as bases of evaluation: the best fit line for Qp versus Qm, the arithmetic mean and standard deviation for the ratio Qp/Qm, the cumulative probability for Qp/Qm, and the histogram and log normal distribution for Qp/Qm. Results of the analyses showed that the best performing CPT methods are the LCPC method by Bustamante and Gianeselli as well as the De Ruiter and Beringen method. These methods were ranked number one according to the mentioned criteria.     

Subsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey

Ground failure in Adapazari, Turkey during the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake was severe. Hundreds of structures settled, slid, tilted, and collapsed due in part to liquefaction and ground softening. Ground failure was more severe adjacent to and under buildings. The soils that led to severe building damage were generally low plasticity silts. In this paper, the results of a comprehensive investigation of the soils of Adapazari, which included cone penetration test (CPT) profiles followed by borings with standard penetration tests (SPTs) and soil index tests, are presented. The effects of subsurface conditions on the occurrence of ground failure and its resulting effect on building performance are explored through representative case histories. CPT- and SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures adequately identified soils that liquefied if the clay-size criterion of the Chinese criteria was disregarded. The CPT was able to identify thin seams of loose liquefiable silt, and the SPT (with retrieved samples) allowed for reliable evaluation of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils. A well-documented database of in situ and index testing is now available for incorporating in future CPT- and SPT-based liquefaction triggering correlations.     

Effects of Construction on Laterally Loaded Pile Groups

Full-scale lateral load tests on a group of bored and a group of driven precast piles were carried out as part of a research project for the proposed high-speed rail system in Taiwan. Standard penetration tests, cone penetration tests (CPT), and Marchetti Dilatometer tests (DMT) were performed before the pile installation. The CPT and DMT were also conducted after pile installation. Numerical analyses of the laterally loaded piles were conducted using p-y curves derived from preconstruction and postconstruction DMT and by applying the concept of p multipliers. Comparisons between preconstruction and postconstruction CPT and DMT data and evaluation of the results of computations show that the installation of bored piles softened the surrounding soil, whereas the driven piles caused a densifying effect.     

CPT-Based Evaluation of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading in Centrifuge

Two series of centrifuge model tests were conducted using Nevada sand. Four saturated models placed in a mildly inclined laminar box and simulating a 6-m-thick deposit were shaken inducing liquefaction effects and lateral spreading. The sand was deposited at a relative density, Dr = 45 or 75%; two of the 45% models were subjected to overconsolidation or preshaking. The second series involved in-flight measurements of static cone tip penetration resistance, qc, simulating the standard cone penetration test (CPT) 36-mm cone. Values of qc increased with Dr, overconsolidation, and preshaking. A normalized resistance, qc1N, was assigned to each of the four liquefaction/lateral spreading models. Increases in Dr, overconsolidation, and preshaking decreased liquefaction and ground deformation, but relative density alone captured these effects rather poorly. Conversely, qc1N predicted extremely well the liquefaction and lateral spreading response of the four models, confirming Seed’s hypothesis to explain the success of penetration-based seismic liquefaction charts. The depth to liquefaction measured in the four centrifuge models is consistent with the field CPT liquefaction chart.     

Prediction of Soil Composition from CPT Data Using General Regression Neural Network

Soil type is typically inferred from the information collected during a cone penetration test (CPT) using one of the many available soil classification methods. In this study, a general regression neural network (GRNN) was developed for predicting soil composition from CPT data. Measured values of cone resistance and sleeve friction obtained from CPT soundings, together with grain-size distribution results of soil samples retrieved from adjacent standard penetration test boreholes, were used to train and test the network. The trained GRNN model was tested by presenting it with new, previously unseen CPT data, and the model predictions were compared with the reference particle-size distribution and the results of two existing CPT soil classification methods. The profiles of soil composition estimated by the GRNN generally compare very well with the actual grain-size distribution profiles, and overall the neural network had an 86% success rate at classifying soils as coarse grained or fine grained.     

Field Investigation of a Sandwich Plate System Bridge Deck

This paper presents the results of a live-load test of the Shenley Bridge, the first bridge application of the sandwich plate system technology in North America. The investigation focused on the evaluation of in-service performance including lateral load distribution behavior and dynamic load allowance. Real-time midspan deflections and strain values were measured under both static and dynamic conditions and under various loading configurations to assess the in-service performance. Distribution factors were determined for interior and exterior girders subjected to single and paired truck loadings. In addition, dynamic load allowance was determined from a comparison of the bridge’s response under static conditions to the response under dynamic conditions. From a comparison of measured results to AASHTO LRFD, AASHTO standard, and CHBDC provisions, it was determined that the current provisions tend to produce conservative predictions for lateral load distribution, but can be unconservative for dynamic load allowance. As a result of the testing program containing a single field test, a finite-element model was also used for determination of lateral load distribution and yielded predictions similar to measured results. The results from the finite-element models were often less conservative than the code provisions.     

Unit Skin Friction from the Standard Penetration Test Supplemented with the Measurement of Torque

The standard penetration test (SPT) supplemented with the measurement of torque (SPT-T) may be used to obtain a direct measurement of unit skin friction (fs) between the sampler and the surrounding soil. The test is performed after the standard SPT procedure and does not compromise conventional SPT results. In order to perform the SPT-T, the split-barrel sampler is rotated after driving the ASTM specified distance and the maximum torque is measured using a calibrated torque wrench or transducer mounted to the top of the drill string. The measured torque is used along with the known geometry of the split-barrel sampler to determine a value of unit skin friction. SPT-T test results at 12 sites are presented. The results also show that the unit skin friction values obtained from the SPT-T generally correlate well with SPT N60 values. The results may be valuable for making preliminary estimates of unit skin friction for driven piles and provide some rationale for reported correlations between N60 and skin friction from piles.     

CPT-DMT Correlations

Although the cone penetration test (CPT) and flat-plat dilatometer test (DMT) have been used for over 30 years, relatively little has been published regarding comprehensive correlations between the two in situ tests. This paper presents preliminary correlations between the main parameters of the CPT and DMT. The key to the proposed correlations is the recognition that the main DMT parameters are normalized and hence, should be correlated with normalized CPT parameters. The suggested correlations are developed and evaluated using published records and existing links to various other parameters as well as comparison profiles. The suggested correlations may guide future more detailed correlations between these two in situ tests.     

Load Configuration and Lateral Distribution of NATO Wheeled Military Trucks for Steel I-Girder Bridges

This paper presents the lateral load distribution of various North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) wheeled military trucks on a simple-span steel I-girder bridge (L = 36?m). The military trucks are classified into the military load classification (MLC) system. The MLC trucks demonstrate different load configurations when compared to the standard HS20 truck in terms of wheel-line spacing, number of axles, and weight. A calibrated three-dimensional finite-element analysis is conducted to examine the MLC load effects. The applicability of the AASHTO LRFD provisions is evaluated using 72 different load models. The wheel-line spacing and weight of the MLC trucks cause different flexural behavior and load distributions of the bridge when compared to those of HS20. The current AASHTO LRFD approach to determine live load distribution factors may be reasonably applicable to the MLC trucks, including approximately 20% of conservative predictions.     

Behavior of Five Large Spread Footings in Sand

Five square spread footings ranging in size from 1 to 3 m were load tested up to 150 mm of settlement. They were all embedded 0.75 m into a medium dense, fairly uniform, silty silica sand. Load-settlement curves are presented, as well as creep curves relating settlement and time under a constant load. Since the soil mass was instrumented with telltales and inclinometers, vertical and horizontal movements in the soil mass were obtained as a function of depth and lateral extent. Conclusions are reached regarding how best to measure footing settlement, how to present load test results, new correlations for use in design, creep settlement, effect of cyclic loading and preloading on creep rate, zone of influence under the footing, mode of deformation of the soil mass, and volume change observations. Twelve settlement methods, six bearing capacity methods, and the WAK (wave activated stiffness) test are evaluated by comparing the predictions with the measurements. Many results of these large-scale instrumented tests confirm findings at small scale of previous researchers.