云南某铜尾矿中铜和金的选矿回收试验

云南某铜尾矿主要金属矿物有黄铜矿、黄铁矿、磁黄铁矿等,黄铜矿以原生硫化铜为主,金以裸露金和黄铜矿包裹金为主。为综合回收其中有价铜、金,进行了选矿试验。试样在磨矿细度为-200目占85%的情况下采用两次粗选、第二次粗选后扫选、两次精选、第二次精选后扫选、混精矿再磨至-325目占85%、粗选后扫选精矿再磨至-325目占85%、中矿循序返回流程处理。最终获得铜品位15.51%、回收率68.34%、产率1.41%的铜金精矿,其中的金品位19.93 g/t、回收率54.04%,银品位231.72 g/t、回收率41.89%。     

富银铜锌多金属矿选矿试验研究

某富银铜锌多金属硫化矿,其银品位为125 g/t,铜品位为0.26%,锌品位为1.13%,硫品位为3.04%;90%的银赋存于银黝铜矿、黝铜矿等铜矿物中。采用“优先浮银铜﹣锌硫混浮﹣锌硫分离”工艺流程进行处理,选择高效银捕收剂SAC强化银的回收,全流程实验获得的银(铜)精矿含银10094 g/t,含铜16.67%,银回收率88.78%,铜回收率80.23%,锌精矿含锌45.46%,锌回收率81.81%。实现了矿石中银铜锌的综合回收。     

某含银高硫铜矿的综合回收试验

某含银高硫铜矿含铜0.76%、硫24.35%及银34.92 g/t,有价矿物种类多、矿石性质复杂,采用抑硫优先浮选铜-活化浮选硫的原则工艺流程进行试验,配合石灰作为硫化铁矿物抑制剂以及筛选出丁基黄药+酯-105作为硫化铜矿物的组合捕收剂,强化了银在铜精矿中的富集。在选定工艺条件下,可获得铜品位21.60%、银品位602.84 g/t的铜精矿(铜和银回收率分别为89.30%和54.39%),硫品位45.60%、银21.55 g/t的硫精矿(硫和银回收率分别为89.79%和29.59%),实现了铜、硫和银的综合回收利用。     

选冶联合流程回收铜银金的工艺

采用ＤＸ 低碱度抑制剂， 用ＮａＯＨ 调节ｐＨ， 在ｐＨ＝ ９ ～１０ 的范围内浮铜抑硫， 使混合精矿中的有价金属与黄铁矿分离， 再选精矿产率２０ ％ ～３０ ％ ， 尾矿含金低于３ ．０ ｇ／ｔ。在较低的压力下（ 氧压０ ．４ ～０ ．６ ＭＰａ） 对所得精矿进行氧压氨浸， 使硫转化为硫酸铵， 铜进入溶液， 金银留在浸渣中。分选中金、银、铜回收率分别为９５ ％ ，９０ ％ 和８５ ％ ； 分选条件为ｐＨ＝ ９ ．５ ， 捕收剂用量２００ ｇ／ｔ， ＤＸ 抑制剂３ｋｇ／ｔ。低压氨浸铜浸出率为９５ ％ ， 浸出压力０ ．５ ＭＰａ， 温度１２０ ℃， 时间３ ｈ ， 氨浓度４５ ｇ／Ｌ。氰化浸出金、银浸出率为９７ ％ 和９５ ％ ， 置换率９９ ％ 和９８ ％ 。金、银、铜总回收率分别为９４ ％ ，８４ ％ 和８１ ％ 。     

高铁富金铜硫多金属矿选矿实验研究

某高铁富金铜硫多金属矿铁品位为31.81%,金品位为1.37 g/t,铜品位为0.70%,硫品位为6.52%,矿石中71.83%的金赋存于铜矿物、黄铁矿、磁铁矿等矿物,而铜矿物、黄铁矿、磁铁矿的嵌布粒度均较粗,普遍在+0.04 mm。采用“优先浮选铜-活化浮选硫-硫尾磁选回收铁”联合工艺处理该矿石,并采用ZA作铜捕收剂,全流程实验获得金品位27.80 g/t,铜品位20.60%,金回收率59.05%,铜回收率83.29%的铜精矿;金品位2.16 g/t,硫品位45.07%,金回收率20.24%,硫回收率86.25%的硫精矿;金品位0.80 g/t,铁品位60.83%,金回收率14.25%,铁回收率45.90%的铁精矿。实现了矿石中金铜铁及载体矿物的高效回收。     

云南某含银铜矿伴生银矿物强化回收实验研究

云南某含银铜矿石银品位为21.77 g/t,主要赋存于黄铜矿、游离银和磁黄铁矿中,在选别过程中铜硫分离时兼顾银的回收具有一定的难度。采用抑硫浮铜流程,研究筛选出石灰及Z200作为合适的调整剂和高效捕收剂,在抑制黄铁矿、磁黄铁矿的同时强化银的回收。最终闭路试验获得了品位23.92%、回收率97.10%的铜精矿,且含银136.38 g/t,银的回收率达到77.05%,实现了铜硫分离的同时强化银的回收。     

湾阳河多金属矿床银的赋存状态及选矿产品考查

湾阳河铜铅锌多金属矿床主金属品位高,伴生金、银、碲、铋造次我咎有益元素,综合利用程度较好主要金属粒度均以细、生细粒嵌布为主,彼此紧密连生,较为复杂。银主要以独立的角矿物存在,与方铅内铜矿、闪锌矿、锑黝铜矿、斑铜矿、钠铁矿、稀矿等关系十分密切,大多 呈包裹体赋丰于金属矿化物,碲化物中,少量产出于矿物粒间或裂隙中。银矿物以碲银矿、银锑黝铜矿为主,其次有含银自然金、银金矿、碲金银矿、自然银、螺状硫银矿、     

某低品位铜硫矿综合回收浮选工艺技术试验研究

针对该低品位铜硫矿的矿物特征,采用抑硫浮铜的优先浮选方案,配合石灰、硫化钠组合抑制剂抑制黄铁矿,成功实现了铜硫的有效分离。该浮选工艺流程结构简单,最终取得了铜精矿品位20.02%,回收率94.33%;硫精矿品位47.33%,回收率79.24%较为理想的试验指标。     

高银铅铜混合精矿选矿试验研究

某高银铅铜混合精矿为铜铅混浮产品,表面受到浮选药剂严重污染,导致铜矿物与铅矿物可浮性差异微小,给铜铅分离带来非常不利的影响,其银品位达到4208.0 g/t,铅品位43.28%,铜品位3.39%,98.80%的银赋存于方铅矿。采用“活性炭脱药-抑铅浮铜”工艺流程处理,环保高效的方铅矿抑制剂GYC,高效铜捕收剂SAC,全流程试验获得银品位4839.2 g/t,银回收率97.36%,铅品位50.05%,铅回收率97.90%的银铅精矿;铜品位20.16%,铜回收率91.23%,银品位724.6 g/t,银回收率2.64%的铜精矿,实现了混合精矿中银铅与铜的高效回收。     

铜阳极泥处理过程中贵金属的行为

针对某有色金属公司在铜阳极泥回收处理过程中出现的铂、钯金属回收率低,金的直收率不够高等情况,应用物质流方法对其处理铜阳极泥中的金、银、铂、钯等贵金属的行为进行研究。结果表明:在目前阳极泥处理工艺中,金、银的分布比较集中,粗金粉富集了阳极泥中近88%(质量分数)的金;97%左右的银集中于粗银粉中;铂与钯分布较分散,铂钯精矿、沉氯化银后液、析铂钯后液以及分银渣中都含有金属铂和钯,其含量都分别在53%、14%、26%和8%左右。     

纳米比亚某含银硫化铜矿选矿试验研究

纳米比亚Karas矿区罗雷铜矿区的原生矿铜主要以黄铜矿、斑铜矿等硫化铜矿物形式存在,银分别以银黝铜矿为主的独立银矿物和以黄铜矿为载体的载体银矿物形式存在,铜、银品位分别为0.60%和3.03 g/t。浮选试验结果表明,矿样适当细磨至-0.074 mm占80%,以石灰做调整剂,Z200做捕收剂,在矿浆p H值为8的条件下,可获得铜品位22.3%,银品位61.8 g/t的含银铜精矿,铜、银回收率分别为90.6%和51.8%。     

山东某含金磁黄铁矿浮选尾矿磁选回收试验研究

山东某含金磁黄铁矿原矿金品位1.60 g/t,硫品位1.86%,属含金硫铁矿。矿石性质研究结果表明,部分以磁黄铁矿为载体的金,矿物含量为0.96%,金品位8.25 g/t,原矿金分配率5.25%。生产流程对以磁黄铁矿为载体的金矿物的回收水平仍有提高空间。为了解决这一问题,开展了从生产原矿和生产尾矿中回收以磁黄铁矿为载体的金的对比试验,结果表明,磁选不宜用于原矿、重选不宜用于尾矿中载金磁黄铁矿的回收;尾矿磁选流程可以实现含金磁黄铁矿的有效富集,最终选择全粒级磁选工艺流程,获得了金品位1.52 g/t,硫品位2.87%的含金磁黄铁矿。尾矿金、硫回收率分别为52.09%、62.93%,对原矿回收率分别为12.27%、18.56%,实现了以磁黄铁矿为载体的金矿物的综合利用。     

山东某含金硫铁矿强化浮选回收试验研究

山东某含金硫铁矿原矿金品位为3.06 g/t、含硫量为2.65%。工艺矿物学研究表明,金主要以自然金等独立金矿物形式存在,其次以黄铁矿为载体,少量以磁黄铁矿为载体。采用快速浮选和常规浮选组合的工艺流程,以硫酸铜做活化剂,MA-1做捕收剂,HX-609做起泡剂,分别获得了金品位为34 g/t、32 g/t的快速浮选精矿和常规浮选精矿,金总回收率达到90%以上。     

Impact of silver sulphides on gold cyanidation with polymetal sulphides

Gold leaching was influenced in association with silver and polymetal sulphide minerals. A packed bed was adopted to single out the galvanic and passivation effects with four sets of minerals: pyrite–silica, chalcopyrite–silica, sphalerite–silica and stibnite–silica. Pyrargyrite enhanced Au recovery to 77.3% and 51.2% under galvanic and passivation effects from pyrite (vs 74.6% and 15.8%). Pyrargyrite in association with sphalerite also enhanced Au recovery to 6.6% and 51.9% (vs 1.6% and 15.6%) under galvanic and passivation effects from sphalerite. Pyrargyrite associated with chalcopyrite retarded gold recovery to 38.0% and 12.1% (vs 57% and 14.1%) under galvanic and passivation effects. Accumulative silver minerals enhanced Au recovery to 90.6% and 81.1% (vs 74.6% and 15.8%) under galvanic and passivation impacts from pyrite. Silver minerals with sphalerite under galvanic and passivation effects enhanced Au recovery to 71.1% and 80.5% (vs 1.6% and 15.6%). Silver minerals associated with chalcopyrite retarded Au recovery to 10.2% and 4.5% under galvanic and passivation impacts (vs 57% and 14.1%). Stibnite retarded Au dissolution with pyrargyrite and accumulative silver minerals. Pyrargyrite and accumulative silver enhanced gold dissolution for free gold and gold associated with pyrite and sphalerite. Gold dissolution was retarded for gold and silver minerals associated with chalcopyrite and stibnite.     

Improving gold recovery of Pb–Zn sulfide ore by selective activation with organic acid

Free gold and gold wrapped in sulfides are considered as the object of gold floatation. However,floatation of free gold exhibits more variables in practice.In this study, improving gold recovery of a Pb–Zn sulfide ore from Yunnan Province, China, was investigated. The results show that free gold and auriferous sulfides account for 94.99 % of total gold. Without adding organic acid in floatation, only 82 % recovery of gold could be obtained.Gold recovery in Au/Pb concentrates increases by 9.29 %with oxalate added and by 7.35 % with citric acid added,respectively, while performances of lead and arsenic nearly keep a constant. A possible reason is that free gold is of wonderful selectivity against pyrite with organic activators.A new method to enhance gold recovery is proposed.     

Alkaline sulfide pretreatment of an antimonial refractory Au-Ag ore for improved cyanidation

This paper presents the alkaline sulfide pretreatment of an antimonial refractory gold and silver ore. In the ore, gold occurs mainly as gold-silver alloys and as associated with quartz and framboidal pyrite grains, and, to a small extent, as the inclusions within antimonial sulfides. Silver is present extensively as antimonial sulfides such as andorite. Alkaline sulfide pretreatment was shown to allow the decomposition of the antimonial sulfide minerals (up to 98% Sb removal) and to remarkably improve the amenability of gold (e.g., from <49% up to 83%) and silver (e.g., from <18% up to 90%) to subsequent cyanide leaching. An increase in reagent concentration (1–4 mol/L Na₂S or NaOH) and temperature (20–80°C), and a decrease in particle size seem to produce an enhancing effect on metal extraction. These findings suggest that alkaline sulfide leaching can be suitably used as a chemical pretreatment method prior to the conventional cyanidation for antimonial refractory gold and silver ores.     

河北某石英脉型金矿石选矿试验研究

河北某石英脉型金矿石金品位5.4 g/t,银品位6.4 g/t。针对该矿石性质,开展浮选试验,在最佳药剂制度条件下浮选闭路试验获得精矿金回收率为78.9%,银回收率35.6%,金品位44.0 g/t,银品位23.5 g/t。为提高选矿指标,开展重选与浮选工艺联合试验。与单一浮选工艺相比,重、浮联合工艺获得混合精矿金回收率提高6.8%,银回收率提高2.2%。     

Acid equilibrium during bioleaching of alkaline low-grade sulfide copper ore

This article reports the study on acid equilibrium during bioleaching of alkaline low-grade copper sulfide ore. Adding auxiliary agents 1# （sulfur） and 2# （pyrite） makes bacterial leaching of copper and acid production carried out simultaneously because the auxiliary agents can be oxidized by bacteria and the oxidation products involve acid. The acid required for dissolving alkaline gangue during bacterial leaching is produced, and acid equilibrium is reached during the ore bio-leaching. The recovery of copper reaches more than 95%.