Mid-diastolic aortic valve opening in bacterial endocarditis of aortic valve

Echocardiographic features of acute aortic regurgitation resulting from bacterial endocarditis have been well documented (Nathan et al., 1980; Weaver et al., 1977; Wray, 1975a), and include thick shaggy echoes from aortic valve in diastole, fine diastolic flutter of aortic valves suggestive of rupture of cusps, and premature closure of mitral valves. Echocardiography being a sensitive noninvasive technique for detecting aortic valve vegetations is heavily relied on for earlier diagnosis and prompt therapy of these patients. Prognosis of echocardiographically positive endocarditis is known to be worse than for echo-negative patients. The following case is being presented because of an unusual echocardiographic manifestation with mid-diastolic aortic valve opening secondary to flail aortic valve from staphylococcal endocarditis of the aortic valve.     

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with different valve substitutes

OBJECTIVE: Stentless biologic aortic valves are less obstructive than stented biologic or mechanical valves. Their superior hemodynamic performances are expected to reflect in better regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. We compared the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in 3 groups of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. Group I (10 patients) received stentless biologic aortic valves, group II (10 patients) received stented biologic aortic valves, and group III (10 patients) received bileaflet mechanical aortic valves. METHODS: Echocardiographic evaluations were performed before the operation and after 1 year, and the results were compared with those of a control group. Left ventricular diameters and function, left ventricular wall thickness, and left ventricular mass were assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS: Group I patients had a significantly lower maximum and mean transprosthetic gradient than the other valve groups (P = .001). One year after operation there was a significant reduction in left ventricular mass for all patient groups (P < .01), but mass did not reach normal values (P = .05). Although the rate of regression in the interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness differed slightly among groups, their values at follow-up were comparable and still higher than control values (P = .002). The ratio between interventricular septum and posterior wall and the ratio between wall thickness and chamber radius did not change significantly at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Because the number of patients was relatively small, we could not use left ventricular mass regression after I year to distinguish among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis by means of valve prostheses with different hemodynamic performances.     

Surgical treatment of traumatic rupture of the aortic valve with dove-coo murmur--case report

Aortic regurgitation due to traumatic rupture of the aortic valve with dove-coo murmur is rare. A 71-year-old man was admitted for cardiac failure due to aortic regurgitation with dove-coo murmur, 4 years after the traffic accident. The aortic valve replacement was performed and his postoperative course was good. The aortic valve was tricuspid valve with the tear in the left side of right coronary cusp, and the size of the tear was 7 mm. The aortic valve was not recognized the findings of inflammatory or rheumatic change in the pathological study.     

Risk of reoperative valve replacement for failed mitral and aortic bioprostheses

BACKGROUND: One factor influencing the choice of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves is reoperation for bioprosthetic valve failure. To define its operative risk, we reviewed our results with valve reoperation for bioprosthetic valve failure. METHODS: Records of 400 consecutive patients having reoperative mitral, aortic, or mitral and aortic bioprosthetic valve replacement from January 1985 to March 1997 were reviewed. RESULTS: Reoperations were for failed bioprosthetic mitral valves in 219 patients, failed aortic valves in 153 patients, and failed aortic and mitral valves in 28 patients. Including 26 operations (6%) for acute endocarditis, 153 operations (38%) were nonelective. One hundred nine patients (27%) had other valves repaired or replaced, and 72 (18%) had coronary bypass grafting. The incidence of death in the mitral, aortic, and double-valve groups was respectively, 15 (6.8%), 12 (7.8%), and 4 (14.3%); and the incidence of prolonged postoperative hospital stay (>14 days) was, respectively, 57 (26.0%), 41 (26.8%), and 8 (28.6%). Only 7 of 147 patients (4.8%) having elective, isolated, first-time valve reoperation died. Multivariable predictors (p < 0.05) of hospital death were age greater than 65 years, male sex, renal insufficiency, and nonelective operation; and predictors of prolonged stay were acute endocarditis, renal insufficiency, any concurrent cardiac operation, and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative bioprosthetic valve replacement can be performed with acceptable mortality and hospital stay. The best results are achieved with elective valve replacement, without concurrent cardiac procedures.     

Combined tracheal resection and aortic valve replacement with a cryopreserved aortic valve allograft

A 69-year-old patient presented with an association of tracheal squamous cell carcinoma and severe aortic valve stenosis. As there was no evidence of metastatic spread a potentially curative resection could be considered. The patient underwent tracheal resection and aortic valve replacement in a one-stage procedure. In light of the potential risk of infection to a prosthetic valve, a cryopreserved aortic valve homograft was implanted. The patient made a full recovery and is doing well after 2 years of follow-up.     

Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allograft: ten-year experience

OBJECTIVE: Cryopreserved aortic allograft can be used for aortic valve replacement in congenital, rheumatic, degenerative, and infected native valve conditions, as well as failed prosthetic valves. This study was conducted to determine the long-term results of aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allografts. METHODS: Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allografts was performed in 117 patients from July 1985 until August 1996. All patients requiring aortic valve replacement regardless of valve disease were considered for allograft replacement; the valve was preferentially used in patients under age 55 years and in the setting of bacterial endocarditis. Four operative techniques involving cryopreserved aortic allografts were used: freehand aortic valve replacement with 120-degree rotation, freehand aortic valve replacement with intact noncoronary sinus, aortic root enlargement with intact noncoronary sinus, and total aortic root replacement. Valve function was assessed by echocardiography during the operation in 78 patients (66%) and after the operation in 77 patients (65%). RESULTS: One-hundred eighteen aortic valve replacements with cryopreserved aortic allografts were performed on 117 patients; mean age was 45.6 years (range 15 to 83 years) and mean follow-up was 4.6 years (range up to 11 years). Intraoperative echocardiography disclosed no significant aortic valve incompetence. There were four operative deaths (3%) and seven late deaths; freedom from valve-related mortality at 10 years was 9:3% +/- 4.55%. New York Heart Association functional status at latest follow-up was normal in 98 (94%) patients. On postoperative echocardiography, 90% had no or trivial aortic valve incompetence. Freedom from thromboembolism at 10 years was 100% and from endocarditis, 98% +/- 2.47%. Seven (6%) patients required valve explantation, four for structural deterioration. At 10 years, freedom from reoperation for allograft-related causes was 92% +/- 3.47%. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allografts can be performed with low perioperative and long-term mortality. Most patients have excellent functional status, and reoperation for valve-related causes is unusual. Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allografts demonstrates excellent freedom from thromboembolism, endocarditis, and progressive valve incompetence.     

Upper T mini-sternotomy for aortic valve operations

OBJECTIVES: New minimally invasive approaches for cardiac surgical procedures are constantly being developed in the hope of decreasing patient morbidity and enhancing the postoperative recovery. This report reviews the use of an upper T mini-sternotomy approach to aortic valve surgery. PATIENTS: Nine consecutive nonselected patients (5 men, 4 women, mean age, 66 years) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with the use of this approach. Two patients had isolated aortic valve stenosis, three had isolated aortic valve incompetence, and four patients had mixed aortic valve disease. RESULTS: In all cases, an excellent view of the aortic valve was obtained, aortic valve replacement with a bileaflet mechanical prostheses was performed, and no intraoperative difficulties were encountered. Mean aortic cross-clamp time was 83 min and mean cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion time was 97 min. All patients were extubated in the operating room at the end of the surgical procedure, and there were no postoperative complications. All patients were discharged home on postoperative day 3, and there were no late complications. CONCLUSION: Through an upper T mini-sternotomy, aortic valve surgery can be performed in the conventional manner using standard surgical instruments with no alteration in cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial protection routines. With this method, postoperative pain is reduced and patient recovery is expeditious.     

Mini-sternotomy for aortic valve surgery

In the recent years more and more efforts have been made widely to introduce new techniques in the minimally invasive cardiac surgery. At our Department and the Link?ping University Hospital, Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, from August 1996 to January 1997, aortic valve surgery was performed in 23 adult patients (9 female, 14 male), age 28-86 years (mean age 62.5 years). Twenty-two patients had aortic valve replacement, among these, in 3 cases concomitant aortic annulus dilatation was made and in one case reduction-plasty of the dilated ascending aorta. In another one case resection of a sub-aortic membrane was performed. The operations and postoperative period were free of complications in all patients. Following an average 36 hours intensive care all patients were discharged after an average of 11.2 day hospital stay. The authors introduce the new surgical technique and present its advantages and disadvantages. Mini-sternotomy has less detrimental structural and functional effects on the thorax. Moreover, due to its minimal surgical trauma, this less invasive technique reduces patient morbidity, hospital stay and cost of care. Since mini-sternotomy is a safe and advantageous technique, the authors recommend applying this new technique in most of aortic valve operations.     

Effects of dobutamine on aortic valve indexes in asymptomatic patients with bileaflet mechanical prostheses in the aortic valve position

We investigated the effects of alternating transvalvular flow rate on Doppler-derived aortic valve resistance and valve area in asymptomatic patients with mechanical aortic valve replacement under dobutamine infusion. The Gorlin-derived aortic valve area and continuity equation-derived aortic valve area seem to be less flow dependent; valve resistance tends to be flow dependent.     

Treatment of the aortic valve and ascending aorta. The significance of reconstructive methods on the aortic root

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The standard surgical repair of disease of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta has been combined replacement, which includes the disadvantage of inserting a mechanical valve. We have investigated an individualized approach which preserves the native valve. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1995 and October 1997, a consecutive total of 101 patients (72 men, 29 women, aged 21-83 years) underwent operations for disease of the ascending aorta: aortic dissection type A in 34 patients, aneurysmal dilatation in 67. Dilatation of the aortic arch was associated with aortic regurgitation in 58 patients. There were 11 patients with aortic valve stenosis or previously implanted aortic valve prosthesis among a total of 46 whose aortic valve was replaced (group II). Supracommissural aortic replacement with a Dacron tube was performed in 16 patients (group I) with normal valve cusps and an aortic root diameter < 3.5 cm. In 28 patients with an aortic root diameter of 3.5-5.0 cm the aortic root was remodelled (group III). Resuspension of the native aortic valve was undertaken in 11 patients with aortic root dilatation of > 5.0 cm (group IV). RESULTS: Operative intervention was electively performed in 72 patients, without any death. Of 29 patients operated as an emergency for acute type A dissection four died (14%). In 55 of the 58 patients with aortic regurgitation in proved possible to preserve native aortic valve (95%). In the early postoperative phase and after an average follow-up time of 11.8 months, transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated good aortic valve function, except in one patient each of groups III and IV who developed aortic regurgitation grades I or II. CONCLUSION: The described individualized approach makes it possible to preserve the native aortic valve in most patients with aortic regurgitation, at a low risk. Follow-up observations so far indicate good results of the reconstruction.     

Systemic hypertension as a risk factor for complications with an aortic mechanical valve

We sought to determine the effect of preoperative systemic hypertension on prosthesis related complications or postoperative aortic dissection after valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of systemic hypertension: Group I, with hypertension (n = 35), and Group II, without hypertension (n = 37). The survival rate and event free rate were examined for 72 patients who were alive 30 days after valve replacement with a St. Jude Medical valve for aortic regurgitation. The cumulative 10 year survival rate of Group I (65% +/- 12%) was lower than that of Group II (79% +/- 15%). The 10 year event free rate of all prosthesis related complications was 62% +/- 13% in Group I, and 96% +/- 3% in Group II (p < 0.05). The 10 year event free rate for ascending aortic dissection was 73% +/- 12% in Group I and 100% in Group II (p < 0.05). The linearized event rate of all prosthesis related complication was 3.8% per patient-year in Group I and 0.5% per patient-year in Group II. In conclusion, systemic hypertension was a risk factor for prosthesis related complications and for complicated aortic lesions after aortic valve replacement. Careful postoperative management for hypertension is necessary in patients with systemic hypertension after aortic valve replacement. Tissue valves may be recommended in patients with aortic valve disease and severe hypertension.     

Should a bicuspid aortic valve be replaced in the presence of subvalvar or supravalvar aortic stenosis?

BACKGROUND: A bicuspid aortic valve is commonly associated with other levels of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Providing the bicuspid aortic valve is competent and nonobstructive, repair of subvalvar or supravalvar stenosis usually focuses on the obstructive lesions, leaving the valve in situ. The aim of this report was to examine the impact of a bicuspid aortic valve on the risk of reoperation for patients undergoing operation for subvalvar or supravalvar aortic stenosis. METHODS: Since 1976, 47 patients with supravalvar or subvalvar aortic stenosis have undergone repair. The median follow-up is 5.1 years (range, 2 months to 20.1 years). Sixteen patients (34%) had a bicuspid aortic valve that was competent and nonobstructive, and 31 (66%) had a tricuspid aortic valve. RESULTS: Reoperation was required in 9 patients (56%) with a bicuspid aortic valve, in each involving aortic valve replacement with an autograft (3), homograft (2), or prosthesis (4). Six patients (19%) with a tricuspid aortic valve required reoperation, yet only 1 required aortic valve replacement. The freedom from valve replacement was 43% (70% confidence interval, 31% to 55%) in the bicuspid aortic valve group versus 100% (70% confidence interval, 94% to 99.5%) in the tricuspid group at 5 years (p = 0.0001). The freedom from any reoperation at 5 years was 43% (70% confidence interval, 31% to 55%) in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve versus 86% (70% confidence interval, 80% to 93%) in the tricuspid group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that patients with subvalvar or supravalvar aortic stenosis and a bicuspid valve may be better palliated with a more definitive operation such as the Ross or Ross-Konno procedure.     

Myxoma of the aortic valve

Myxoma of the aortic valve is exceedingly uncommon. In this article, we report a 58-year-old man with myxoma arising from the aortic valve. Aortic valve replacement was performed, and postoperative histologic examination showed myxoma of aortic valve.     

Planimetric quantification of aortic valve stenoses using multiplanar transesophageal echocardiography

Standard techniques used in order to quantify the severity of aortic valve stenoses in clinical practice comprise: transthoracic echocardiography, namely, by determining maximum and mean transvalvular gradients and evaluating aortic valve areas, as well as invasive techniques which quantify aortic valve areas through hemodynamic pressure measurements and application of the Gorlin formula. Since the introduction of the multiplane TEE technique, it has become feasible to scan the aortic valve in a strictly horizontal plane and quantify the aortic valve orifice by planimetry. In this study, we investigated 23 patients with various degrees of aortic valve stenoses. We compared aortic valve areas, which had been planimetrically determined by multiplane TEE scans, and mean aortic valve gradients (standard TEE technique) with pressure gradients and valve areas derived from hemodynamic measurements obtained during cardiac catheterization, and have found that the valve areas as well as the mean pressure gradients correlate well.     

Impact of size mismatch and left ventricular function on performance of the St. Jude disc valve after aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic function of the St. Jude valve may change relative to changes in left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. From theoretical reasons one may hypothesize that prosthetic valve hemodynamic function is related to left ventricular failure and mismatch between valve size and patient/ventricular chamber size. METHODS: Forty patients aged 24 to 82 years who survived aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with a standard St. Jude disc valve (mean size, 23.5 mm; range, 19 to 29 mm) were followed up prospectively with Doppler echocardiography and radionuclide left ventriculography preoperatively and 9 days, 3 months, and 18 months after the operation with assessment of intravascular hemolysis at 18 months. Follow-up to a maximum of 7.4 years (mean, 6.3 years) was 100% complete. RESULTS: Left ventricular muscle mass index decreased from 198 +/- 62 g.m-2 preoperatively to 153 +/- 53 g.m-2 at 18 months (p < 0.001), paralleled by a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction, peak ejection rate, and peak filling rate; only 18% of the patients had normal left ventricular muscle mass index and only 32% normal ventricular function (normal left ventricular ejection fraction, peak ejection rate, peak filling rate, early filling fraction, and late filling fraction during atrial contraction) at 18 months. Prosthetic valve peak Doppler gradient dropped from 20 +/- 6 mm Hg at 9 days to 17 +/- 5 mm Hg at 18 months (p < 0.05). Reduction of left ventricular muscle mass index was unrelated to peak gradient and size of the valve. Peak gradient at 18 months rose with valve orifice diameter of 17 mm or less (by 6 mm Hg), orifice diameter/body surface area of 9 mm.m-2 or less (by 5 mm Hg), left ventricular enddiastolic dimension (by 23 mm Hg per 10 mm increase), and impaired ventricular function (by 3 mm Hg). All but 2 patients (5%) had intravascular hemolysis; none had anemia. Two patients with moderate paravalvular leak had the highest serum lactic dehydrogenase levels; 4 patients with trivial leak had higher serum lactic dehydrogenase levels than those without leak. Serum lactic dehydrogenase levels rose with moderate paravalvular leak, impaired ventricular function, and valve orifice diameter. Six patients with trivial or moderate paravalvular leak had a cumulative 7-year freedom from bleeding and thromboembolism of 44% +/- 22% compared with 87% +/- 5% for those without leak (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The peak gradient of the St. Jude aortic valve dropped marginally over the first 18 postoperative months in association with incomplete left ventricular hypertrophy regression and marginal improvement of ventricular function. Mismatch between valve size and ventricular cavity size or patient size and impaired function of a dilated ventricle significantly compromised the performance of the St. Jude valve. Probably explained by platelet destruction or activation, paravalvular leak was related to bleeding and thromboembolic complications.     

A case of infective endocarditis with the mycotic aortic valve aneurysm

A 49-year old man was admitted with a complaint of syncopal attack. Transient A.V block was detected and permanent pacemaker (DDD) was implanted. Five months later he was re-admitted because of dyspnea and palpitation. Infective endocarditis with aortic regurgitation and mycotic aortic valve aneurysm was diagnosed by echocardiography and cineangiography. The aortic valve and valve aneurysm were resected and AVR was performed using Bj?rk-Shiley disc valve (23A) in the usual manner. But 6 months later he suffered from acute cardiac failure due to perivalvular leakage. He died in spite of re-AVR with translocation method.     

Retrograde coronary artery flow in aortic valve disease

Retrograde coronary artery flow was observed angiographically in 43 patients with aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation. In the 24 patients with pure or predominant aortic stenosis, retrograde flow was seen in all 24 during end-systole. In the eight patients with pure aortic regurgitation, retrograde flow was seen mainly during end-diastole (6/8). Among the 11 patients with stenosis and regurgitation, retrograde flow was both end-systolic and enddiastolic. Dominant left coronary arteries were seen in 13 patients; 13 showed retrograde flow in the dominant arteries. Dominant right coronary arteries were seen in 25 patients: all 25 showed retrograde flow equally in the right and left coronary. Five of the 43 patients could not be evaluated for dominance because of coronary artery occlusions. The severity of retrograde flow did not correlate with usual clinical, hemodynamic or tension-stress parameters: angina, electrocardiographic abnormality, end-diastolic pressure or volume, end-systolic pressure or volume, ejection fraction, severity of aortic regurgitation, peak or mean valve gradient, aortic valve area, myocardial tension and stress calculations, or DPTI:SPTI. In summary, retrograde coronary artery flow was seen in all 43 patients with severe aortic valve disease. The time in the cardiac cycle when retrograde flow occurred was related to the type of valve disease. Retrograde flow was seen mainly in the coronary arteries supplying the left ventricle and may result from increased regional myocardial stresses.     

A new procedure for aortic valve repair

A new technique is presented for aortic valve repair. This procedure involves shaving the surface of rheumatic aortic valves using a high-speed electric rasp. It is safer and more expeditious to shave the concave shaped aortic cusp at the base, and then shave the body of the cusp along the flexion stress line. In a patient treated using this procedure, aortic valve regurgitation decreased and the aortic valve gradient almost disappeared.     

Clinical, echocardiographic, and pathologic features of aortic wall dehiscence of porcine bioprosthetic valves: a cause of rapidly progressive mitral regurgitation and heart failure after bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement

The aim of this study was to define the clinical, echocardiographic, and pathologic correlates of commissural dehiscence of aortic wall from the stent post of the porcine bioprostheses in the mitral position. This form of valve degeneration was found in 5 of 23 explanted mitral bioprostheses. A thickened, separated aortic wall at multiple commissural sites along with other evidence of valve degeneration was identified in the three patients who had chronic congestive heart failure. A large dehiscence at a single commissural site with otherwise normal valve morphology was present in the two patients who had acute heart failure. Two dimensional/Doppler echocardiography showed a prolapsing or a flail anteriorly positioned leaflet and an eccentric posteriorly directed mitral regurgitation jet in all patients. These echocardiographic findings in patients with a porcine bioprosthetic mitral valve should suggest commissural dehiscence from the aortic wall as a possible mechanism of valve failure. Exclusive involvement of the porcine aortic bioprosthesis placed in the mitral position along with involvement of strut of the bioprosthesis facing the aortic root in all cases suggests excessive hemodynamic stress on the valve in the mitral position and in particular on the anteriorly placed strut as the potential cause of this form of valve degeneration.     

Enterococcal infective endocarditis on native aortic valve

Enterococcal endocarditis accounts for 10% of all bacterial endocardits. The infection progresses in a subacute way and when localized on the aortic valve it has a very poor prognosis since the valve is usually destroyed being death the fatal outcome. We report a case of a patient with infective endocarditis resulting from the implantion of the Enterococcus on the native aortic valve. Nor visk factors or an apparent main gate could be found. The patient was hospitalized after several months of a non especific febrile syndrome. The literature is reviewed. Diagnostic tests and clinical signs are discussed making emphasis on the refractoriness to chemotherapy.