Losartan blocks aldosterone and renal vascular responses to angiotensin II in humans

In vitro and animal studies have demonstrated that the effect of angiotensin II (Ang II) on aldosterone is mediated through the Ang II type 1 receptor. However, it has been difficult to demonstrate an effect of Ang II type 1 receptor blockade on aldosterone levels in human studies. One possible explanation is that subjects have not been studied under salt-controlled conditions. Therefore, we examined the effects of losartan on the aldosterone and renal plasma flow responses to Ang II infusion in six normotensive subjects under low and high salt conditions. Ang II was infused in graded doses (0.3 to 10 ng/kg per minute) in the presence and absence of losartan (a single 50-mg oral dose). Renal plasma flow was assessed by measurement of para-aminohippurate clearance. Blood pressure, plasma aldosterone levels (low salt conditions only), and para-aminohippurate clearance were measured before and after each Ang II dose. Losartan had no effect on baseline systolic pressure but attenuated the systolic pressure response to exogenous Ang II during both low salt (0.7 +/- 1.9 versus 6.7 +/- 1.4 mm Hg, P = .001) and high salt (2.0 +/- 1.9 versus 12.3 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, P = .006) conditions. Under low salt conditions, losartan reduced the baseline plasma aldosterone level from 1135 +/- 204 to 558 +/- 102 pmol/L (P = .015) and blocked the aldosterone response to Ang II (-49 +/- 110 versus +436 +/- 83 pmol/L, P = .019). During high salt conditions, losartan had no effect on baseline renal plasma flow but attenuated the renal plasma flow response to Ang II (-90.1 +/- 15.1 versus -185.1 +/- 2.6 mL/min per 1.73 m2, P = .013). These data confirm that losartan lowers both basal and exogenous Ang II-stimulated aldosterone levels under low salt conditions. Losartan does not significantly affect baseline renal plasma flow but does attenuate the renal plasma flow response to exogenous Ang II under high salt conditions.     

The effect of lead selection on traditional and heart rate-adjusted ST segment analysis in the detection of coronary artery disease during exercise testing

1. The present studies were designed to measure the affinity of UP 269-6, a newly developed angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, for vascular AT1 receptors from normotensive and hypertensive rats and to investigate in vitro, its effects on angiotensin II (AII)-induced hyperplasia and hypertrophy of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). In addition the in vivo effects of UP 269-6 on neointimal proliferation in a carotid artery balloon injury in normotensive rats were also investigated. 2. UP 269-6 selectively inhibited [125I]-Sar1-Ile8-AII binding to vascular AT1 receptors present on VSMC derived from normotensive Wistar rat and from SHR (Ki = 16.6 +/- 3.6 nM and 7.5 +/- 2.0 nM, respectively). In comparison, losartan and its metabolite, EXP 3174, inhibited [125I]-Sar1-Ile8-AII binding to vascular AT1 receptors derived from both cell models with Ki values slightly lower (losartan) and higher (EXP 3174), respectively, than that of UP 269-6. 3. AII (1 microM) induced a weak and variable hyperplastic response (4 to 32% increase in cell number) in Wistar rat VSMC after 96 h. 4. AII (1 microM) induced a time-dependent increase in cell number in VSMC from SHR. UP 269-6 inhibited concentration-dependently this effect with an IC50 value of 159 +/- 58 nM. Losartan was clearly less potent and EXP 3174 showed nearly the same inhibitory potency, compared to UP 269-6. UP 269-6 (1 microM) inhibited nearly completely the action of AII. 5. AII (500 nM) caused maximal stimulation of protein synthesis in Wistar rat VSMC (117 +/- 36%). UP 269-6, losartan and EXP 3174 totally inhibited this stimulation with IC50 values of 28 +/- 6 nM, 3504 +/- 892 nM and 21 +/- 3 nM, respectively. 6. AII (50 nM) induced maximal stimulation of protein synthesis in SHR VSMC (237 +/- 67%). UP 269-6, losartan and EXP 3174 totally inhibited this stimulation with IC50 values of 16 +/- 3 nM, 282 +/- 122 nM and 3.3 +/- 1.0 nM, respectively. 7. UP 269-6 (75 mg kg-1 day-1) administered orally in the diet for 20 days induced a 38% reduction in neointimal area and a 36% reduction in neointima/media ratio associated with the intimal thickening induced by carotid artery balloon injury. 8. In conclusion, UP 269-6 was shown to be a potent antiproliferative agent both in vitro on AII-induced hyperplasia and hypertrophy of VSMC derived from normotensive and hypertensive rats, and in vivo upon intimal thickening induced by carotid artery balloon injury in the rat.     

Decisions, decisions

Losartan is the first angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist to become available for the treatment of hypertension. However, recent reports have revealed several cases of losartan-induced bronchoconstriction. We investigated to determine the mechanism of losartan-induced bronchoconstriction, considering in particular the involvement of endogenous nitric oxide (NO). In this study, we examined the effects of losartan on airway obstruction and endogenous NO production using anesthetized guinea pigs and cultured airway epithelial cells. Five minutes after administration of angiotensin II (Ang II), the bronchoconstriction induced by acetylcholine was not changed. In contrast, Ang II in the presence of losartan caused a significant increase in the acetylcholine responsiveness. Pretreatment with L-N omega-nitroarginine-methylester (L-NAME) potentiated acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction 5 min after administration of Ang II, and L-arginine reversed this action of L-NAME on the acetylcholine responsiveness. Moreover, Ang II administration increased NO concentration in expired air (12.5 +/- 1.5 ppb for saline, 40 +/- 5 ppb for Ang II, p < 0.01), and losartan significantly inhibited Ang II-stimulated NO release (20 +/- 3.5 ppb) from guinea pig airway. In cultured airway epithelial cells, Ang II also increased NO release (160 +/- 25 nM), and the effect of this Ang II-induced NO release was significantly inhibited by pretreatment with losartan (25 +/- 8 nM, p < 0.01). These findings suggest that losartan-induced bronchoconstriction may result from inhibition of endogenous NO release in the airway.     

Angiotensin subtype 1 blockade selectively potentiates adenosine subtype 2-mediated vasodilation

A previous report demonstrated that infusion of adenosine into the forearm increased local vascular production of angiotensin II. We hypothesize that this increase in angiotensin II could attenuate the vasodilator response to adenosine subtype 2 (A2) receptor activation. The depressor and regional hemodynamic responses to the A2-selective adenosine agonist DPMA were measured in the presence and absence of angiotensin subtype 1 (AT1) receptor blockade (losartan, 10 mg/kg IV) in anesthetized rats. Losartan pretreatment (without versus with losartan) significantly potentiated DPMA-induced reductions in renal (-13 +/- 2% versus -22 +/- 4%, P < .05) and mesenteric (-11 +/- 2% versus -23 +/- 4%, P < .05) vascular resistances, resulting in a greater depressor response (-7 +/- 2 versus -18 +/- 3 mm Hg, P < .05). The decrease in hindquarter vascular resistance was not affected. To test the specificity of this interaction, we also evaluated nitroglycerin and nifedipine. Pretreatment with losartan had no effect on the responses to nitroglycerin, whereas the responses to nifedipine either were not affected or were attenuated (percent change in mesenteric vascular resistance: without losartan pretreatment, -30 +/- 1%; with losartan pretreatment, -24 +/- 2%, P < .05). To determine whether the decrease in arterial pressure after losartan pretreatment contributed to the potentiation of the DPMA-mediated effects, we infused nitroglycerin to lower mean arterial pressure comparably to losartan treatment. None of the hemodynamic responses to subsequent DPMA administration were affected. These data suggest that endogenous levels of angiotensin II, whether released locally or systemically, selectively attenuate the A2-mediated reductions in renal and mesenteric vascular resistances.     

Effect of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on portal pressure in cirrhosis

Administration of angiotensin II causes an increase in portal pressure, and plasma concentration of angiotensin II is elevated in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting that angiotensin II may be involved in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. We evaluated the effect of the orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Thirty patients with severe (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >/= 20 mm Hg) and 15 patients with moderate (HVPG < 20 mm Hg) portal hypertension at baseline measurement were treated with an oral dose of 25 mg losartan once daily for 1 week and compared with 15 (HVPG >/= 20 mm Hg) and 10 (HVPG < 20 mm Hg), respectively, cirrhotic controls. On the seventh day, HVPG was determined again, and blood pressure, heart rate, body weight, and parameters of liver and kidney function were recorded. Losartan induced a significant (P <.001) decrease of HVPG in the patients with severe (-46.8% +/- 15.5%) and moderate (-44.1% +/- 14.7%) portal hypertension, while no significant change was seen in the controls. Losartan caused a slight but significant (P <.01) fall in mean arterial blood pressure (-3.1 +/- 5.0 and -3.5 +/- 4.3 mm Hg, respectively). One patient treated with losartan had a short symptomatic hypotensive reaction after the first dose of losartan that did not recur despite continued treatment. No deterioration of liver or kidney function was observed. The present study indicates that angiotensin II blockade with orally administered losartan is safe and highly effective in the treatment of portal hypertension.     

Adhesiveness of the free surface of a human endometrial monolayer for trophoblast as related to actin cytoskeleton

We have previously shown that angiotensin II(3-7) [Ang II(3-7)] stimulates behavioural activity of rats similar to angiotensin II (Ang II). The involvement of AT1 angiotensin receptors in stimulating the behavioural activity of rats, using their selective ligand losartan (DUP 753), was examined. Ang II(3-7), given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) at a dose of 1 nmol, significantly enhanced recall of a passive avoidance behaviour, object recognition, learning of conditioned avoidance responses (CARs) and apomorphine (1 mg kg-1, i.p.) stereotypy. Losartan (1 microgram, i.c.v.) did not alter any of the behaviours except for that measuring anxiety which was diminished both, in peptide treated and in control rats. On the other hand, losartan abolished Ang II(3-7) facilitation of recall of the passive avoidance, object recognition and the increase in apomorphine stereotypy. Losartan did not influence the increased rate of CARs acquisition after the peptide. None of the treatments significantly changed locomotor activity estimated in an open field. These data point to some involvement of AT1 angiotensin receptors in the behavioural activity of Ang II(3-7).     

Effects of angiotensin II and losartan in the forearm of patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor-mediated constrictor effects may be modulated by hypertension-related vascular changes, changes in receptor function and in neurohumoral activity. DESIGN: The forearm blood flow (FBF) effects of angiotensin II, methoxamine, and losartan were investigated in essential hypertensive patients. Minimal forearm vascular resistance was measured to determine structural vascular changes. METHODS: Seven hypertensive patients were selected, and seven matched normotensives. Angiotensin II (0.01-10 ng/kg per min) was infused during predilatation by sodium nitroprusside (6.1 +/- 0.6 ng/kg per min) before and during losartan infusion (0.3-3 microg/kg per min). Methoxamine (0.2-2 microg/kg per min) was co-infused with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. FBF, measured by venous occlusion plethysmography, was expressed as the change in FBF ratio (FBFinfused arm/FBFnon-infused arm). RESULTS: Baseline FBF (infused arm) was increased by sodium nitroprusside from 2.56 +/- 0.80 to 5.46 +/- 0.92 (P<0.05) and from 2.66 +/- 0.25 to 5.42 +/- 0.40 ml/100 ml per min (P<0.05) in the hypertensive and normotensive group, respectively. Baseline forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was higher in the hypertensive than in the normotensive group [51 +/- 8 versus 33 +/- 3 mmHg/ (ml/100 ml per min); P<0.05]. Angiotensin II caused a maximal change in FBF ratio (Emax) by -70 +/- 3 and -72 +/- 6% in the hypertensive and normotensive group, respectively (NS). Tachyphylaxis did not occur. Infusions of losartan at 0.3, 1 and 3 microg/kg per min reduced the Emax values from -70 +/- 3 to -50 +/- 5, -45 +/- 5 and -15 +/- 2%, respectively, in the hypertensive group, and from -72 +/- 6 to -62 +/- 4, -45 +/- 2 and -32 +/- 2%, respectively, in the normotensive group (NS). Infusion of methoxamine significantly reduced the FBF ratio by -58 +/- 6 and -69 +/- 5% in the hypertensive and normotensive groups, respectively (NS). Minimal FVR, after forearm ischemia, was the same in hypertensives and normotensives, namely 3.2 +/- 0.7 and 3.2 +/- 0.4 mmHg/(ml per 100 ml per min), respectively (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II type 1- and alpha1-mediated vascular effects were unchanged by essential hypertension. Baseline FVR was greater in the hypertensives than in the normotensives, while minimal FVR was the same. These results indicate that the forearm vascular bed of the patient group studied does not show important structural and renin-angiotensin system-related functional changes as a result of hypertension.     

The nature of the spondylolytic defect. Demonstration of a communicating synovial pseudarthrosis in the pars interarticularis

The in vitro effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) in human vessels are not well studied. The development of specific Ang II-receptor antagonists has made it possible to delineate more carefully the receptor mechanisms involved. The objective of this study was twofold: to investigate the effect of Ang II on human coronary arteries and to study the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade with losartan. The setting was contractile experiments with ring segments of coronary arteries. We observed that Ang II is a vasoconstrictor of human coronary arteries, with a pEC50 value of 9.26 +/- 0.22 and Emax of 68.7 +/- 9.61% of potassium-induced contraction. Losartan (10-100 nM) shifted the concentration-response curve of Ang II to the right, with pEC50 values of 7.64 +/- 0.10 and 7.00 +/- 0.15, respectively (p = 0.001), demonstrating the antagonistic properties of losartan. We also noted a decreased maximal response to Ang II after incubation of losartan, with Emax of 51.1 +/- 7.08% and 41.9 +/- 4.70% (p = 0.05), respectively. In conclusion, this is the first report describing the contractile effect of Ang II and the antagonizing effects of losartan in isolated human coronary arteries.     

The effect of angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade in the brain on the maintenance of blood pressure during haemorrhage in sheep

The effect of systemic or intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist losartan on blood pressure during hypotensive haemorrhage was investigated in five conscious sheep. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured during haemorrhage (15 mL kg-1 body wt). Losartan (1 or 0.33 mg h-1) was given to sheep by ICV, intravenous or intracarotid administration, beginning 60 min before and continuing during the haemorrhage. During control infusion of ICV artificial cerebrospinal fluid, MAP was maintained until 13.16 +/- 0.84 mL kg-1 blood loss, when a rapid reduction of at least 15 mmHg in arterial pressure occurred (the decompensation phase). ICV infusion of losartan at 1 mg h-1 caused an early onset of the decompensation phase after only 9.8 +/- 0.8 mL kg-1 of blood loss compared with control. Intravenous infusion of losartan (1 mg h-1) also caused an early onset (P < 0.05) of the decompensation phase at 10.2 +/- 1.0 mL kg-1 blood loss. This dose of losartan inhibited the pressor response to ICV angiotensin II, but not to intravenously administered angiotensin II, indicating that only central AT1 receptors were blocked. Bilateral carotid arterial administration of losartan at 0.33 mg h-1 caused an early onset of the decompensation phase during haemorrhage at 11.06 +/- 0.91 mL kg-1 blood loss (P < 0.05), which did not occur when infused by intravenous or ICV routes. The results indicate that an angiotensin AT1-receptor-mediated mechanism is involved in the maintenance of MAP during haemorrhage in sheep. The locus of this mechanism appears to be the brain.     

Acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in man is attenuated by type I angiotensin II receptor blockade

OBJECTIVES: We examined the hypothesis that angiotensin II (ANG II) is a modulator of acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) by looking at the effect of losartan, a selective type 1 ANG II receptor antagonist, on acute HPV in man. METHODS: Ten normal volunteers were studied on two separate days. They either received pre-treatment with losartan 25, 50, 100, 100 mg respectively on four consecutive days or matched placebo. They were then rendered hypoxaemic, by breathing an N2/O2 mixture for 20 min to achieve an SaO2 of 85-90% adjusted for a further 20 min to achieve an SaO2 of 75-80%. Pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography was used to measure mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), cardiac output and hence pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). RESULTS: Baseline MPAP and PVR (during normoxaemia) were unaffected by losartan pre-treatment compared with placebo. However, losartan significantly reduced MPAP at both levels of hypoxaemia compared with placebo: 14.7 +/- 0.7 vs 19.0 +/- 0.7 mmHg at an SaO2 85-90% (P < 0.01) and 20.0 +/- 0.7 vs 25.7 +/- 0.8 mmHg at an SaO2 75-80% (P < 0.05) respectively. Similarly losartan significantly reduced PVR compared to placebo: 191 +/- 9 vs 246 +/- 10 dyne.s.cm-5 at an SaO2 85-90% (P < 0.005) and 233 +/- 12 vs 293 +/- 18 dyne.s.cm-5 at an SaO2 75-80% (P < 0.05), respectively. Pre-treatment with losartan, however, had no significant effect on systemic vascular resistance although losartan compared to placebo resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in mean arterial pressure at an SaO2 75-80%: 78 +/- 2 vs 87 +/- 2 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan had no effect on baseline pulmonary haemodynamics but significantly attenuated acute hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, suggesting that angiotensin II plays a role in modulating this response in man via its effects on the type 1 angiotensin II receptor.     

Salt-dependent renal effects of an angiotensin II antagonist in healthy subjects

This study was designed to evaluate in healthy volunteers the renal hemodynamic and tubular effects of the orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan (DuP 753 or MK 954). Losartan or a placebo was administered to 23 subjects maintained on a high-sodium (200 mmol/d) or a low-sodium (50 mmol/d) diet in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. The two 6-day diet periods were separated by a 5-day washout period. On day 6, the subjects were water loaded, and blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and urinary electrolyte excretion were measured for 6 hours after a single 100-mg oral dose of losartan (n = 16) or placebo (n = 7). Losartan induced no significant changes in blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, or renal blood flow in these water-loaded subjects, whatever the sodium diet. In subjects on a low-salt diet, losartan markedly increased urinary sodium excretion from 115 +/- 9 to 207 +/- 21 mumol/min (P < .05). The fractional excretion of endogenous lithium was unchanged, suggesting no effect of losartan on the early proximal tubule in our experimental conditions. Losartan also increased urine flow rate (from 10.5 +/- 0.4 to 13.1 +/- 0.6 mL/min, P < .05); urinary potassium excretion (from 117 +/- 6.9 to 155 +/- 11 mumol/min); and the excretion of chloride, magnesium, calcium, and phosphate. In subjects on a high-salt diet, similar effects of losartan were observed, but the changes induced by the angiotensin II antagonist did not reach statistical significance. In addition, losartan demonstrated significant uricosuric properties with both sodium diets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mechanisms of angiotensin II chronotropic effect in anaesthetized dogs

1. The chronotropic effect of angiotensin II (5 micrograms in 1 ml of Tyrode solution), injected directly into the sinus node artery of 24 anaesthestized and vagotomized dogs pretreated with a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, was evaluated before and after the administration of: (a) an angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist (losartan, 50 micrograms kg-1 min-1 infused i.v. for 120 min), (b) an alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist (prazosin, 1 mg kg-1 i.v. bolus injected), (c) a Ca2+ channel blocker (nifedipine 50, 100 and 200 micrograms kg-1 i.v. bolus injected) and (d) a protein kinase inhibitor (staurosporine, 800 nM infused via the sinus node artery at 0.6 ml min-1 for 15 min). 2. Losartan and staurosporine by themselves had no effect on basal systemic arterial pressure and heart rate, whereas prazosin and nifedipine caused significant diminutions of both parameters. 3. Angiotensin II induced significant increases in heart rate, the mean augmentations being 29 +/- 2 beats min-1. Losartan, nifedipine and staurosporine significantly decreased the chronotropic effect of angiotensin II, the mean respective diminutions being 65 +/- 8, 40 +/- 9 and 64 +/- 10%, whereas prazosin had no effect. 4. This work has demonstrated that angiotensin II exerts in vivo a significant positive chronotropic effect that is mediated via AT1 receptors located in the region of the sinoatrial node. This effect is independent of the adrenergic system. It is decreased by the inhibition of the production of protein kinases, most probably of protein kinase C, and by the blockade of the voltage-sensitive L-type Ca2+ channels. Other studies are obviously needed to ascertain the role of angiotensin II in the control of heart rate and/or the genesis of arrhythmias.     

Role of pseudolynchia canariensis in the transmission of haemoproteus turtur from the migrant Streptopelia turtur to new bird hosts in Egypt

OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to establish the roles of angiotensin II and of the cardiopulmonary baroreceptor reflex in the regulation of peripheral vascular tone in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Forearm blood flow responses to subsystemic, locally active intrabrachial infusions were measured in patients with Child's Grade C cirrhosis and matched controls using bilateral venous occlusion plethysmography. Responses were determined to the angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist, losartan, noradrenaline, angiotensin II and the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NG-monomethyl arginine. RESULTS: Losartan at 30 and 90 micrograms/min caused no significant change in blood flow in controls, but caused 23 +/- 6% and 27 +/- 5% increases in patients respectively (p < 0.001). Lower body negative pressure caused a mean bilateral reduction in forearm blood flow of 20 +/- 4% in controls (p < 0.001) but only tended to reduce flow (9 +/- 5%; p = 0.06) in patients (p < 0.001; controls vs. patients). Noradrenaline, angiotensin II and L-NG-monomethyl arginine caused significant vasoconstriction (p < 0.001) in both patients and controls although angiotensin II caused significantly less vasoconstriction in patients (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that angiotensin II makes an important contribution to basal peripheral vascular tone in patients with cirrhosis in the face of reduced vascular responses to its local administration. In addition, the vasoconstrictor response to cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading is attenuated despite normal vascular responses to noradrenaline. These responses are consistent with chronic activation of the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems in patients with advanced cirrhosis.     

AT2-antagonist sensitive potentiation of angiotensin II-induced vasoconstrictions by blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in rat renal vasculature

1. Although the actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) on renal haemodynamics appear to be mediated by activation of the AT1 receptor subtype, AT2 binding sites have also been evidenced in the adult kidney vasculature. As NO is known to mask part of the renal effects of vasoconstrictor drugs, we queried whether the Ang II-induced vasoconstrictions could occur via multiple receptor subtypes during inhibition of NO synthesis. We explored the effect of AT1 and AT2 receptor (AT-R) antagonists on Ang II-induced pressure increases during NO synthase or soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibition in rat isolated kidneys perfused in the presence of indomethacin at constant flow in a single-pass circuit. 2. In the absence of NO blockade, the AT1-R antagonist L-158809 (500 nM) antagonized the Ang II-induced vasoconstrictions, while the AT2-R antagonist PD-123319 (500 nM) had no effect. 3. Perfusing kidneys in the presence of either NO synthase inhibitors, L-NAME (100 microM) or L-NOARG (1 mM), or soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor, LY-83583 (10 microM), significantly increased both molar pD2 (from 9.40+/-0.25 to 10.36+/-0.11) and Emax values (from 24.9+/-3.1 to 79.9+/-4.9 mmHg) of the concentration-response curve for Ang II-induced vasoconstriction. 4. In the presence of L-NAME, 500 nM L158809 abolished the Ang II-induced vasoconstrictions whatever the concentration tested. On the other hand, 500 nM PD-123319 reversed the left shift of the concentration-response curve for Ang II (molar pD2 value 9.72+/-0.13) leaving Emax value unaffected (91.3+/-7.6 mmHg). 5. In the presence of L-NAME, the potentiated vasoconstriction induced by 0.1 nM and the augmented vasoconstriction induced by 10 nM Ang II were fully inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by L-158809 (0.05-500 nM). By contrast, PD-123319 (0.5-500 nM) did not affect the 10 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction and concentration-dependently decreased the 0.1 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction plateauing at 65% inhibition above 5 nM antagonist. 6. Similar to PD-123319, during NO blockade the AT2-R antagonist CGP-42112A at 5 nM decreased by 50% the 0.1 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction and at 500 nM had no effect on 10 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction. 7. In conclusion, the renal Ang II-induced vasoconstriction, which is antagonized only by AT1-R antagonist in the presence of endogenous NO, becomes sensitive to both AT1- and AT2-R antagonists during NO synthesis inhibition. While AT1-R antagonist inhibited both L-NAME-potentiated and -augmented components of Ang II-induced vasoconstriction, AT2-R antagonists inhibited only the L-NAME-potentiated component.     

An inhibitor of lymphocyte proliferation produced by a human colonic adenocarcinoma cell line in culture

1. The relative ability of the renal and femoral vascular beds to remove infused angiotensin II and noradrenaline was examined in anaesthetized greyhounds. 2. The degree of extraction of infused drug by each vascular bed was expressed as a percentage, calculated by comparing the pressor response to intra-arterial infusion with that obtained when the same dose was administered by the intravenous route. 3. When compared with the same dose given intravenously, the pressor responses after renal artery administration of angiotensin II were reduced by a mean of 77.8 +/- 4.1% (mean +/- SEM, n = 12), whereas those after femoral artery infusions at the same dose were reduced by a mean of only 27.2 +/- 4.9% (n = 12). 4. The pattern of extraction seen with noradrenaline infusions administered in a similar manner was the reverse of that with angiotensin II. There was a 28.9 +/- 6.8% (n = 7) reduction in pressor responses to renal artery infusions; in contrast, femoral artery infusions of the same dose exhibited a 99.0 +/- 1.0% (n = 7) reduction in the pressor responses. 5. Local arterial administration of the angiotensin II competitive antagonist, [Sar1,Ile8]angiotensin II, potentiated the systemic pressor responses to renal artery infusions of angiotensin II, but not those to femoral artery infusions. 6. It is suggested that the marked ability of the renal vascular bed to remove circulating angiotensin II may, in part, involve receptor-binding, although this seems not to be the case in the femoral vascular bed.     

Role of extracellular signal-regulated kinases in angiotensin II-stimulated contraction of smooth muscle cells from human resistance arteries

BACKGROUND: We assessed the role of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) in Ang II-stimulated contraction and associated signaling pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from human small arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: VSMCs derived from resistance arteries (<300 microm in diameter) from subcutaneous gluteal biopsies of healthy subjects (n=8) were used to assess Ang II-stimulated [Ca2+]i, pHi, and contractile responses. [Ca2+]i and pHi were measured with fura 2-AM and BCECF-AM, respectively, and contraction was measured photomicroscopically in cells grown on Matrigel matrix. To determine whether tyrosine kinases and ERKs influence Ang II-stimulated responses, cells were pretreated with 10(-5) mol/L tyrphostin A-23 (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and PD98059 (MEK inhibitor). Ang II-stimulated MEK activity was determined by tyrosine phosphorylation of ERKs. The angiotensin receptor subtypes (AT1 and AT2) were assessed with [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II (a nonselective subtype antagonist), losartan (a selective AT1 antagonist), and PD123319 (a selective AT2 antagonist). Ang II dose-dependently increased [Ca2+]i (pD2=8.4+/-0.36, Emax=541+/-55 nmol/L), pHi (pD2=9. 4+/-0.29, Emax=7.19+/-0.01), and contraction (pD2=9.2+/-0.21, Emax=36+/-2.2%). Ang II induced rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of ERKs, which was inhibited by PD98059. Tyrphostin A-23 and PD98059 attenuated (P<0.05) Ang II-stimulated second messengers, and PD98059 reduced Ang II-induced contraction by >50%. [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II and losartan, but not PD123319, blocked Ang II-stimulated responses. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that in VSMCs from human peripheral resistance arteries, functional Ang II receptors of the AT1 subtype are coupled to signaling cascades involving Ca2+ and pHi pathways that are partially dependent on tyrosine kinases and ERKs. ERKs, the signaling cascades characteristically associated with cell growth, may play an important role in Ang II-stimulated contraction of human VSMCs.     

Losartan but not verapamil inhibits angiotensin II-induced tissue endothelin-1 increase: role of blood pressure and endothelial function

Endothelin partially mediates angiotensin (Ang) II-induced vascular changes in vivo. This study investigated the effects of the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker verapamil on vascular reactivity and tissue endothelin-1 levels in aortas of Wistar-Kyoto rats treated for 2 weeks with Ang II (200 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Ang II increased systolic blood pressure (39+/-4 mm Hg, P<0.05). Concomitant treatment with losartan abolished the Ang II-induced pressure increase (P<0.05), whereas verapamil reduced it only partially (P<0.05). In the aortas of rats with Ang II-induced hypertension, tissue endothelin-1 content was increased threefold and contractions to endothelin-1 were impaired (P<0.05). Interestingly, these alterations were normalized by losartan (P<0.05) but not by verapamil. Hence, there was a strong, negative correlation between contractions to endothelin-1 and tissue endothelin-1 content (r=-0.733, P<0.0001). In contrast, both antihypertensive drugs normalized impaired endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine and reduced the sensitivity of vascular smooth muscle to sodium nitroprusside compared with Ang II-treated rats (P<0.05). Ang II-induced hypertension enhanced endothelium-dependent contractions to acetylcholine, and these were normalized by either drug. In conclusion, these findings suggest that long-term treatment with Ang II modulates endothelin-1 protein expression in the rat aorta. Although both antihypertensive agents lowered blood pressure and normalized endothelial function, only losartan prevented the increase in tissue endothelin-1 content, suggesting that angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonists but not calcium antagonists modulate tissue endothelin-1 in vivo.     

Public health developments in colonial Malaya: colonialism and the politics of prevention

-Previous studies have shown that whereas the nonclipped kidney in two-kidney, one clip (2K1C) rats undergoes marked depletion of renin content and renin mRNA, intrarenal angiotensin II (Ang II) levels are not suppressed; however, the distribution and functional consequences of intrarenal Ang II remain unclear. The present study was performed to assess the plasma, kidney, and proximal tubular fluid levels of Ang II and the renal responses to intrarenal Ang II blockade in the nonclipped kidneys of rats clipped for 3 weeks. The Ang II concentrations in proximal tubular fluid averaged 9.19+/-1.06 pmol/mL, whereas plasma Ang II levels averaged 483+/-55 fmol/mL and kidney Ang II content averaged 650+/-66 fmol/g. Thus, as found in kidneys from normal rats with normal renin levels, proximal tubular fluid concentrations of Ang II are in the nanomolar range. To avoid the confounding effects of decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP), we administered the nonsurmountable AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan directly into the renal artery of nonclipped kidneys (n=10). The dose of candesartan (0.5 microg) did not significantly decrease MAP in 2K1C rats (152+/-3 versus 148+/-3 mm Hg), but effectively prevented the renal vasoconstriction elicited by an intra-arterial bolus of Ang II (2 ng). Candesartan elicited significant increases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (0.65+/-0. 06 to 0.83+/-0.11 mL. min-1. g-1) and renal blood flow (6.3+/-0.7 to 7.3+/-0.9 mL. min-1. g-1), and proportionately greater increases in absolute sodium excretion (0.23+/-0.07 to 1.13+/-0.34 micromol. min-1. g-1) and fractional sodium excretion (0.38+/-0.1% to 1.22+/-0. 35%) in 2K1C hypertensive rats. These results show that proximal tubular fluid concentrations of Ang II are in the nanomolar range and are much higher than can be explained on the basis of plasma levels. Further, the data show that the intratubular levels of Ang II in the nonclipped kidneys of 2K1C rats remain at levels found in kidneys with normal renin content and could be exerting effects to suppress renal hemodynamic and glomerular function and to enhance tubular reabsorption rate.