Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost

OBJECTIVE: To compare tension-free open mesh hernioplasty under local anaesthetic with transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair under general anaesthetic. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial of 403 patients with inguinal hernias. SETTING: Two acute general hospitals in London between May 1995 and December 1996. SUBJECTS: 400 patients with a diagnosis of groin hernia, 200 in each group. Main outcome measures: Time until discharge, postoperative pain, and complications; patients' perceived health (SF-36), duration of convalescence, and patients' satisfaction with surgery; and health service costs. RESULTS: More patients in the open group (96%) than in the laparoscopic group (89%) were discharged on the same day as the operation (chi2 = 6.7; 1 df; P=0.01). Although pain scores were lower in the open group while the effect of the local anaesthetic persisted (proportional odds ratio at 2 hours 3.5 (2.3 to 5.1)), scores after open repair were significantly higher for each day of the first week (0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) on day 7) and during the second week (0.7 (0.5 to 0.9)). At 1 month there was a greater improvement (or less deterioration) in mean SF-36 scores over baseline in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group on seven of eight dimensions, reaching significance on five. For every activity considered the median time until return to normal was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group. Patients randomised to laparoscopic repair were more satisfied with surgery at 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The mean cost per patient of laparoscopic repair was 335 pounds (95% confidence interval 228 pounds to 441 pounds) more than the cost of open repair. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that laparoscopic hernia repair has considerable short term clinical advantages after discharge compared with open mesh hernioplasty, although it was more expensive.     

Prospective randomized comparative study of laparoscopic hernioplasty and Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty]

To compare the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TAPP) and the open Lichtenstein technique, in 1992 a prospective randomized trial was initiated. Until 1995 108 patients with 130 hernias took part in the trial: 64 TAPP (group A) and 66 Lichtenstein (group B). 22 patients had simultaneous bilateral repairs. Laparoscopic approach (group A) was able to expose otherwise-occult controlateral hernias in 3 cases and discovered a complex hernia (a hernia with more than one defect in the wall) in 2 patient in whom a direct hernia had been diagnosed before the operation. Mean operating time for monolateral operations was significantly longer in group A (p < 0.05). The corresponding figures for bilateral operations were longer in group B (p < 0.01). No intraoperative complications, conversions from TAPP to open repair, postoperative deaths. There were not less pain quicker mobility and shorter period of disability in the laparoscopic group (group A). Ten (15.6%) postoperative complications occurred in group A: local hematoma (6 cases, 9.3%), neuralgias (3 cases, 4.7%), urinary retention (1 case, 1.6%). Eight (12.1%) postoperative complications: hematomas (3 cases, 4.5%), urinary retention (3 cases, 4.5%), neuralgias (2 cases, 3%) occurred in group B. Differences were not significant. The current follow-up period is 36 months (15-54) in median. In both groups no recurrences occurred, but 3 patients in group B who were operated on for monolateral hernia (6.5%) discovered to be affected by contralateral hernia. The results of the present report suggest that TAPP does not appear to be associated with better results in terms of complications, pain or period of disability as compared to open tension free hernia repair, but the ability of the laparoscopic approach to expose otherwise-occult defects eliminated the risk of recurrences due to missed hernias.     

10 years experience in performing Shouldice operation

206 male patients were operated for primary direct and indirect inguinal hernia, or both, by Shouldice technique at general surgical departments of Madadeni Hospital, Newcastle, South Africa, Pásztó Hospital and Szolnok MAV Hospital, Hungary between 1986 and 1996. Mean age was 51 yrs +/- 15 yrs (17-91 yrs). The operations were performed by the original way of Shouldice described that type of hernia repair in 1945. 175 patients had spinal and 31 patients had local anesthesia with intravenous fluid and sedation respectively. Studies indicate that collagen metabolic dysfunction plays a major rule in the etiology of groin hernia. Until this is more clearly defined, surgeons will continue to repair groin hernias constitute 15% of operations in general surgery. In approach to groin hernia, the best view for examination of the inguinal region can be obtained by Shouldice technique to decide the proper surgical intervention to repair groin hernia. With low recurrence rate and rapid rehabilitation, author reports 2% of recurrence rate, the Shouldice operation highly recommended.     

The medical demands of the special athlete

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Before choosing between open and laparoscopic preperitoneal tension-free repair, a study comparing their safety and short-term outcome was needed. No randomised studies comparing the two hernia repair techniques have hitherto been published. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomised study was carried out comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh herniorrhaphy (n = 24) to open preperitoneal mesh herniorrhaphy (n = 25). RESULTS: When comparing unilateral repairs, the mean operation time was significantly (P < 0.01) shorter in the open group (55 min) than in the laparoscopic group (66 min). Pain on movement (P < 0.05) and pain on coughing (P < 0.01) receded more rapidly in the laparoscopic group. The median time before return to work or normal activity was 7 days (range 1-60) in laparoscopic and 5 days (1-30) in open repair. There were five (21%) complications associated with the laparoscopic procedure, while the open procedure resulted in two (8%) complications. After a median follow-up of 18 months the recurrence rate in the laparoscopic group was 13% and in the open group 8%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study the open method was associated with fewer complications and recurrences than the laparoscopic technique. Despite the decreased postoperative discomfort after laparoscopic repair, there was no significant difference in median time before return to work or normal activity. These results together with the higher cost of the laparoscopic procedure suggest that the open method is more suitable at least for unilateral hernias.     

Inguinal hernia--which method leads to the goal? Endoscopic and open surgical procedures are available

In recent years, the methods available for repair of inguinal hernia have greatly expanding, resulting in confusion as to what constitutes a suitable choice. Is it to be laparoscopy or open surgery, plastic mesh yes or no, general anesthesia or local anesthesia? Bassini's operation has now been ousted by the Shouldice procedure, which is suitable for all primary forms of hernia. The Lichtenstein procedure is readily and rapidly carried out under local anesthesia, making it suitable for use in multimorbid and old patients; the recurrence rate is low. The laparoscopic approach can be recommended for patients who, for private or occupational reasons need to be up and about again as soon as possible. It is also particularly suitable for the treatment of recurrent hernias or for the simultaneous repair of bilateral hernias. Disadvantages are the high costs, a lack of long-term results and unusual complications that are not seen in open surgery.     

Mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy: a ten-year review

Inguinal herniorrhaphy remains one of the most common surgical operations, with approximately 10 to 20 per cent performed for recurrence. Reviews by specialized hernia centers show mesh repair has a recurrence rate of 0.2 per cent. Detractors of this repair include increased cost, technical difficulty, and risk for infection. The purpose of this study was to compare mesh versus nonmesh inguinal herniorrhaphy at a large teaching institution. From 1985 to 1994, 892 patients underwent primary repair for inguinal hernia at the Veterans Administration Hospital at Memphis, TN. Patients were stratified by repair [Lichtenstein (Mesh), open anterior (Bassini, Marcy, McVay, and Shouldice), laparoscopic (Lap), and preperitoneal (Post)]. Operative time for Mesh repair (111 +/- 2 minutes) was longer than for Bassini or McVay (91 +/- 2 and 98 +/- 2 minutes; P < 0.05), and Lap repairs were longer than all others (192 +/- 16 minutes; P < 0.05). Hospital stay averaged 2.2 +/- 0.1 days for Mesh versus 2.6 +/- 0.1 days for all repairs combined (P = not significant). Mesh patients developed four wound infections (1.0%), none requiring mesh removal, versus nine infections (1.8%) in other groups (P = not significant). One Mesh patient (0.3%) developed recurrence, compared with 16 (3.5%) with open anterior repair (P < 0.01). Inguinal herniorrhaphy using an open mesh repair technique provides superior recurrence rates without increasing risk for infection, length of stay, or technical difficulty.     

A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair with a standard tension-free open mesh repair (open). METHODS: A total of 108 low-risk patients with unilateral (primary or recurrent) or bilateral hernias were randomized to TAPP (group 1 = 52 cases) or open (group 2 = 56 cases). The outcome measures included operating time, complications, postoperative pain, return to normal activity, operating theater costs, and recurrences. RESULTS: The mean operative time was longer for the TAPP than for the open group only in unilateral primary hernias. At rest, the median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was higher for group 1 than group 2 at 48 h postoperatively. Mild to discomforting pain in the inguinal region after 7 days, night pain after 30 days, and inguinal hardening after 3 months were more frequent in group 2 than group 1. No significant differences were observed in return to normal activities between the groups. One hernia recurrence was observed after 1 month in group 1. TAPP was significantly more expensive than open. CONCLUSIONS: TAPP was associated with less postoperative pain than open. The increase in operating theater costs, however, was dramatic and was not compensated by shorter time away from work. TAPP should not be adopted routinely unless its costs can be drastically reduced.     

Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hernia repair has often been criticized for its high costs. METHODS: To compare the costs of laparoscopic and open hernia repair, 40 patients were randomized for either transabdominal laparoscopic or Lichtenstein mesh repair (under local anesthesia) in a day-case surgery unit. RESULTS: Median operative times for the laparoscopic and open groups were 62 and 65 min, respectively. Postoperative pain was comparable for the two groups. The period before return to normal life was 14 days in the laparoscopic group and 21 days in the open group. The hospital costs were 2051 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) higher in the laparoscopic group, but the total costs for employed patients (including expenses due to lost work days) were lower. CONCLUSION: Although the Lichtenstein operation is cheaper for the hospital, the total costs for working patients are lower with the laparoscopic technique, when the cost of lost work days is factored into overall expense.     

Experience with 300 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs with up to 3 years follow-up

The long-term results of 300 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs are reported with 11 cases followed up more than 3 years, 104 cases more than 2 years, and 225 cases more than 1 year. There were five early failures owing to the use of too small a piece of mesh. There have been no long-term recurrences. The results indicate that transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic mesh repair of hernias is a satisfactory technique with a low recurrence rate and a low major complication rate (4%). Patients have found the procedure to be remarkably pain free and 51% have taken no analgesics after discharge from hospital. Of the patients, 78% returned to work within 2 weeks of the operation. These results suggest that laparoscopic hernia repair can be performed safely with excellent long-term results.     

Prospective randomized trial comparing Shouldice and Bassini-Kirschner operation technique in primary inguinal hernia repair

The authors conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the Shouldice and the Bassini-Kirschner technique between April, 1994 and December, 1995. During this period 129 adult patients, mean age 54 (17-87) years underwent operation on primary inguinal hernias in their department. 63 Shouldice and 66 Bassini-Kirschner operations were performed by 17 surgeons. The duration of surgery, the technique of anesthesia, the perioperative complications, the duration of postoperative care, then one year after the operation the recurrence rate and the patient's subjective complains were investigated. 85 patients of 129 were examined one year after the operation in spite of that all the patients were invited for control. Both operations gave almost the same results in the perioperative period and nearly identical recurrence rate (4.44% in Shouldice and 5.0% in Bassini-Kirschner group). The patient's subjective complains were also very similar one year after the operation. The authors could not find significant difference in the results of the two types of surgery although they were well experienced with the Bassini-Kirschner operation and just starting to practice the Shouldice procedure. These facts suggest that having more experience with the Shouldice operation makes available the extreme low recurrence rate published by several authors.     

Recurrent inguinal hernia: preferred operative approach

Inguinal herniorrhaphy remains one of the most common general surgical operations, with approximately 10 to 20 per cent performed for recurrence. Subsequent repairs provide considerable technical challenge, as well as substantially greater risk of developing further recurrence. Mesh repair is advocated by several specialized hernia centers, demonstrating re-recurrence rates less than 2 per cent. Detractors of this repair include cost, technical difficulty, and risk for infection. The purpose of this study was to compare results of mesh and nonmesh repairs for recurrent inguinal hernia, either using an anterior or posterior approach, at a large teaching institution. From January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1994, 146 patients underwent repair for recurrent inguinal hernia at the Veterans Administration Hospital at Memphis, Tennessee. Patients were stratified by type of repair: Lichtenstein (Mesh), open anterior (OA), Bassini, Marcy, McVay, Shouldice, and preperitoneal with or without mesh. Patient ages and weights were similar between groups. Mean operative time for Mesh repair (104 +/- 4 minutes) was longer than that for OA repairs (80 +/- 5 minutes, P < 0.05) or preperitoneal without mesh repairs (92 +/- 5 minutes, P < 0.05). Mesh-based posterior repairs had the longest operative times (116 +/- 5 minutes). Hospital stay averaged 2.8 +/- 0.3 days, similar among all groups. One wound infection (1.0%) occurred in patients undergoing Mesh repair, which required operative drainage. No patient required removal of mesh. Two patients in the Mesh group (5.9%) developed recurrence compared with four recurrences (18.0%) in patients undergoing OA repairs. Only one patient with a mesh-based posterior repair recurred (1.9%) compared to eight without mesh (21.6%, P < 0.01). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 12 years. Repair of recurrent inguinal hernia using either an anterior or posterior mesh repair technique, performed at a teaching facility, provides superior recurrence rates without increasing risk for infection or length of stay. Preperitoneal mesh based repair is the preferred technique.     

Surgical outcome and cost-minimisation-analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomised prospective trial with one year follow up

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome and costs between laparoscopic and open hernia repair. DESIGN: Prospective randomised study. SETTING: One university and two district hospitals in Sweden. SUBJECTS: 200 men aged 25-75 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operating time, hospital stay, complications, and time to recovery. A cost-minimisation-analysis was used in which the total costs were calculated for a defined period of time for each option. RESULT: The one year follow-up rate was 98%. Mean (SD) operation times in the laparoscopic and open groups were 72 (30) and 62 (25) minutes, respectively (p = 0.009). Hospital stay and complication rates did not differ between the groups. Among employees the mean (SD) periods off work in the laparoscopic and open groups were 10 (8) and 23 (21) days, respectively (p = 0.0001). The mean direct costs of the laparoscopic operation were increased by SEK 4037 (US$ 483) but the savings in indirect costs resulting from earlier return to work were SEK 11392 (US$ 1364). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hernia repair gave the employed patients faster recovery and return to work, and was the most cost-effective strategy provided that both direct and indirect costs were included.     

The nuclear scaffold structures and plasmid DNA replication in the cells of higher eukaryotes]

In a prospective randomized trial comparing the totally preperitoneal (TPP) laparoscopic approach and the Stoppa procedure (open), 100 patients with inguinal hernias (Nyhus IIIA, IIIB, IV) were followed over a 3-year period. Both groups were epidemiologically comparable. In the laparoscopic group, operating time was significantly longer (p = 0.01), but hospital stay (3.2 vs. 7.3 days) and delay in return to work (17 vs. 35 days) were significantly reduced (p = 0.01). Postoperative comfort (less pain) was better (p = 0.001) after laparoscopy. In this group, morbidity was also reduced (4 vs. 20%; p = 0.02). The mean follow-up was 605 days, and 93% of the patients were reviewed at 3 years. There were three (6%) recurrences after TPP, especially at the beginning of the surgeon's learning curve, versus one for the Stoppa procedure (NS). For bilateral hernias, the authors suggest the use of a large prosthesis rather than two small ones to minimize the likelihood of recurrence. In the conditions described, the laparoscopic (TPP) approach to inguinal hernia treatment appears to have the same long-term recurrence rate as the open (Stoppa) procedure but a real advantage in the early postoperative period.     

Randomized clinical trial of two laparoscopic treatments of endometriomas: cystectomy versus drainage and coagulation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of two laparoscopic methods for the management of endometriomas with regard to pain relief, pregnancy rate, and disease recurrence. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENT(S): Sixty-four patients with advanced stages of endometriosis. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomly allocated at the time of laparoscopy to undergo either cystectomy of the endometrioma (group 1) or drainage of the endometrioma and bipolar coagulation of the inner lining (group 2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pain relief and pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): Thirty-two patients were enrolled in each group. The 24-month cumulative recurrence rates of dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain were lower in group 1 than in group 2 (dysmenorrhea: 15.8% versus 52.9%; deep dyspareunia: 20% versus 75%; nonmenstrual pelvic pain: 10% versus 52.9%). The median interval between the operation and the recurrence of moderate to severe pelvic pain was longer in group 1 than in group 2 (19 months [range, 13.5-24 months] versus 9.5 months [range, 3-20 months]). The 24-month cumulative pregnancy rate was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (66.7% versus 23.5%). CONCLUSION(S): For the treatment of ovarian endometriomas, a better outcome with a similar rate of complications is achieved with laparoscopic cystectomy than with drainage and coagulation.     

Controlled trial of preperitoneal local anaesthetic for reducing pain following laparoscopic hernia repair

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized trial was performed to determine whether local anaesthetic solutions injected into the preperitoneal space may provide additional pain relief following transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair were allocated randomly to receive (1) bupivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, (2) bupivacaine 1.5 mg/kg with 1 in 200000 adrenaline, (3) bupivacaine 3 mg/kg or (4) saline instilled into the preperitoneal space at the end of the operation. An independent clinical assessor determined the level of pain using a visual analogue pain score and noted the parenteral and oral analgesia requirements at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after operation. Results: At each of the time intervals, there was no significant difference between the groups for pain scores (at 24 h, P = 0.71) or the number of doses of either morphine (at 24 h, P = 0.73) or oral analgesia (at 24 h, P = 0.89). There was also no significant difference in the time to return to normal activity or work between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that instilling local anaesthetic into the preperitoneal space has no significant effect on postoperative pain relief requirement following laparoscopic hernia repair. Other methods of reducing postoperative pain should be sought that may facilitate day-case laparoscopic hernia surgery.     

Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: the new gold standard of hernia repair?

The surgical treatment of the common inguinal hernia has been one of the most analyzed and debated topics in medicine. Recently, with the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, interest in minimally invasive surgical techniques has led to it's application for inguinal hernia repair. Current laparoscopic herniorrhaphies are based on the principles of conventional open preperitoneal repairs and are classified into two types: 1) transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and 2) totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Common advantages to both techniques include a decrease in postoperative pain, earlier return to normal activity, and improved cosmesis. Both laparoscopic techniques have the disadvantage of requiring general or regional anesthesia and increased procedural costs. Lastly, there is a concern that laparoscopic hernia repair has not been around long enough to know the risk of late recurrences. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, however, is a viable alternative to standard open inguinal hernia repair.     

Posterior approaches in groin hernia repair with prosthesis: open or closed

Laparoscopic herniorraphies have been used to reduce the pain and convalescence associated with open approaches. However, there is still not any consensus of the best approach. We compared open preperitoneal and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal approaches in groin hernia repair. METHODS: Thirty-two patients underwent open preperitoneal herniorraphy (Group I) and other 32 patients underwent total extraperitoneal repair (Group II). Time of surgery was noted. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was applied to evaluate the postoperative pain intensity. RESULTS: Operation time was 35 (20-65) minutes in Group I and 58 (40-85) minutes in Group II (p < 0.05). The difference of complication ratios between two groups was not significant. Laparoscopic approach was associated with less pain within postoperative 24 hours as compared to the open technique. However, after the first postoperative day, there was no longer statistically significant difference between both groups. No recurrence has yet been seen in follow-up period of 15 (4-24) months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic herniorraphy is associated with better results in term of postoperative pain within the first 24 hours as compared to open technique.     

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. A preperitoneal tension-free approach

At the present time laparoscopic herniorrhaphy appears to be successfully performed by utilizing a preperitoneal approach. The major indications are bilaterals hernia and the recurrent hernia. Other routine hernias may be done at the decision of the surgeon and patient depending upon the necessity of rapid return to work and desire to minimize pain. Utilizing this approach, the recurrence rate at the present time is less than 1%, which compares favorably with all other types of repair.     

Perioperative transfusion, postoperative infection, and recurrence of head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND: Considering the high recurrence rate after conventional inguinal hernia repair, the totally preperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been used. METHODS: The present experience of the authors embraces 1085 patients with a total of 1717 inguinal hernias, including 200 recurrences. The operative technique is described with emphasis on pitfalls and tricks. RESULTS: Analysis of the data concerning the first 403 patients with 1 year complete follow-up reveals a mean (SEM) operating time of 42 (1.2) min for unilateral and 58 (1.0) min for bilateral hernia repair. Mean (SEM) postoperative hospital stay was 2 (0.04) days. Complication rates during and after operation were 0.3% and 3.3% respectively. The morbidity rate at 1 month after operation was 3.5%. The recurrence rate was 0.3% at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Totally preperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair is safe and reproducible for any type of primary or recurrent inguinal hernia, even in patients with previous subumbilical surgery or severe systemic disease. Careful follow-up is mandatory to assess the late recurrence rate.