Exergetic life cycle assessment of a hydrogen production process

Exergetic life cycle assessment (ExLCA) is applied with life cycle assessment (LCA) to a hydrogen production process. This comparative environmental study examines a nuclear-based hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a copper–chlorine cycle. LCA, which is an analytical tool to identify, quantify and decrease the overall environmental impact of a system or a product, is extended to ExLCA. Exergy efficiencies and air pollution emissions are evaluated for all process steps, including the uranium processing, nuclear and hydrogen production plants. LCA results are presented in four categories: acidification potential, eutrophication potential, global warming potential and ozone depletion potential. A parametric study is performed for various plant lifetimes. The ExLCA results indicate that the greatest irreversibility is caused by uranium processing. The primary contributor of the life cycle irreversibility of the nuclear-based hydrogen production process is fuel (uranium) processing, for which the exergy efficiency is 26.7% and the exergy destruction is 2916.3 MJ. The lowest global warming potential per megajoule exergy of hydrogen is 5.65 g CO₂-eq achieved a plant capacity of 125,000 kg H₂/day. The corresponding value for a plant capacity of 62,500 kg H₂/day is 5.75 g CO₂-eq.     

Environmental evaluation of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using the Cu-Cl Cycle: A parametric study

Variations of environmental impacts with lifetime and production capacity are reported for nuclear based hydrogen production plants using the three-, four- and five-step (copper-chlorine) Cu-CI thermochemical water decomposition cycles. Life cycle assessment is utilized which is essential to evaluate and to decrease the overall environmental impact of any system and/or product. The life cycle assessments of the hydrogen production processes indicate that the four-step Cu-Cl cycle has lower environmental impacts than the three- and five-step cycles due to its lower thermal energy requirement. Parametric studies show for the four-step Cu-Cl cycle that acidification and global warming potentials can be reduced from 0.0031 to 0.0028 kg SO₂-eq and from 0.63 to 0.55 kg CO₂-eq, respectively, if the lifetime of the system increases from 10 to 100 years.     

Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources

In this study, we present a comparative environmental impact assessment of possible hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources with a special emphasis on their application in Turkey. It is aimed to study and compare the performances of hydrogen production methods and assess their economic, social and environmental impacts, The methods considered in this study are natural gas steam reforming, coal gasification, water electrolysis via wind and solar energies, biomass gasification, thermochemical water splitting with a Cu–Cl and S–I cycles, and high temperature electrolysis. Environmental impacts (global warming potential, GWP and acidification potential, AP), production costs, energy and exergy efficiencies of these eight methods are compared. Furthermore, the relationship between plant capacity and hydrogen production capital cost is studied. The social cost of carbon concept is used to present the relations between environmental impacts and economic factors. The results indicate that thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl and S–I cycles become more environmentally benign than the other traditional methods in terms of emissions. The options with wind, solar and high temperature electrolysis also provide environmentally attractive results. Electrolysis methods are found to be least attractive when production costs are considered. Therefore, increasing the efficiencies and hence decreasing the costs of hydrogen production from solar and wind electrolysis bring them forefront as potential options. The energy and exergy efficiency comparison study indicates the advantages of biomass gasification over other methods. Overall rankings show that thermochemical Cu–Cl and S–I cycles are primarily promising candidates to produce hydrogen in an environmentally benign and cost-effective way.     

Environmental impacts of a standalone solar water splitting system for sustainable hydrogen production: A life cycle assessment

Hydrogen is broadly utilized in various industries. It can also be considered as a future clean energy carrier. Currently, hydrogen is mainly produced from typical fuels such as coal; however, there exist some other clean alternatives which use water decomposition techniques. Water splitting via the copper-chlorine (Cu–Cl) thermochemical cycle is a superb option for producing clean carbon-free fuel. Here, the life cycle assessment (LCA) technique is used to investigate the environmental consequences of an integrated solar Cu–Cl fuel production facility for large-scale hydrogen production. The impact of varying important input parameters including irradiation level, plant lifetime, and solar-to-hydrogen efficiency on various environmental impacts are investigated next. For instance, an improve in the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency from 15% to 30%, results in a reduction in the GWP from 1.25 to 6.27E-01 kg CO₂ eq. An uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to deal with the study uncertainties. The results of the LCA show that the potential of acidification and global warming potential (GWP) of the current system are 8.27E-03 kg SO₂ eq. and 0.91 kg CO₂ eq./kg H₂, respectively. According to the sensitivity analysis, the plant lifetime has the highest effect on the total GWP of the plant with a range of 0.63–1.88 kg of CO₂ eq./kg H₂. Results comparison with past thermochemical-based studies shows that the GWP of the current integrated system is 7% smaller than that of a solar sulfur-iodine thermochemical cycle.     

Global warming potential of the sulfur–iodine process using life cycle assessment methodology

A life cycle assessment (LCA) of one proposed method of hydrogen production – thermochemical water-splitting using the sulfur–iodine cycle couple with a very high-temperature nuclear reactor – is presented in this paper. Thermochemical water-splitting theoretically offers a higher overall efficiency than high-temperature electrolysis of water because heat from the nuclear reactor is provided directly to the hydrogen generation process, instead of using the intermediate step of generating electricity. The primary heat source for the S–I cycle is an advanced nuclear reactor operating at temperatures corresponding to those required by the sulfur–iodine process. This LCA examines the environmental impact of the combined advanced nuclear and hydrogen generation plants and focuses on quantifying the emissions of carbon dioxide per kilogram of hydrogen produced. The results are presented in terms of global warming potential (GWP). The GWP of the system is 2500 g carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO₂-eq) per kilogram of hydrogen produced. The GWP of this process is approximately one-sixth of that for hydrogen production by steam reforming of natural gas, and is comparable to producing hydrogen from wind- or hydro-electric conventional electrolysis.     

Life cycle assessment of nuclear-based hydrogen and ammonia production options: A comparative evaluation

In this study, nuclear energy based hydrogen and ammonia production options ranging from thermochemical cycles to high-temperature electrolysis are comparatively evaluated by means of the life cycle assessment (LCA) tool. Ammonia is produced by extracting nitrogen from air and hydrogen from water and reacting them through nuclear energy. Since production of ammonia contributes about 1% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, new methods with reduced environmental impacts are under close investigation. The selected ammonia production systems are (i) three step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (ii) four step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (iii) five step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (iv) nuclear energy based electrolysis, and (v) nuclear high temperature electrolysis. The electrolysis units for hydrogen production and a Haber–Bosch process for ammonia synthesis are utilized for the electrolysis-based options while hydrogen is produced thermochemically by means of the process heat available from the nuclear power plants for thermochemical based hydrogen production systems. The LCA results for the selected ammonia production methods show that the nuclear electrolysis based ammonia production method yields lower global warming and climate change impacts while the thermochemical based options yield higher abiotic depletion and acidification values.     

Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods

A comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) is reported for five methods of hydrogen production, namely steam reforming of natural gas, coal gasification, water electrolysis via wind and solar electrolysis, and thermochemical water splitting with a Cu–Cl cycle. Carbon dioxide equivalent emissions and energy equivalents of each method are quantified and compared. A case study is presented for a hydrogen fueling station in Toronto, Canada, and nearby hydrogen resources close to the fueling station. In terms of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl cycle is found to be advantageous over the other methods, followed by wind and solar electrolysis. In terms of hydrogen production capacities, natural gas steam reforming, coal gasification and thermochemical water splitting with the Cu–Cl cycle methods are found to be advantageous over the renewable energy methods.     

Economic comparison of solar hydrogen generation by means of thermochemical cycles and electrolysis

Hydrogen is acclaimed to be an energy carrier of the future. Currently, it is mainly produced by fossil fuels, which release climate-changing emissions. Thermochemical cycles, represented here by the hybrid-sulfur cycle and a metal oxide based cycle, along with electrolysis of water are the most promising processes for ‘clean’ hydrogen mass production for the future. For this comparison study, both thermochemical cycles are operated by concentrated solar thermal power for multistage water splitting. The electricity required for the electrolysis is produced by a parabolic trough power plant. For each process investment, operating and hydrogen production costs were calculated on a 50 MW_th scale. The goal is to point out the potential of sustainable hydrogen production using solar energy and thermochemical cycles compared to commercial electrolysis. A sensitivity analysis was carried out for three different cost scenarios. As a result, hydrogen production costs ranging from 3.9–5.6 €/kg for the hybrid-sulfur cycle, 3.5–12.8 €/kg for the metal oxide based cycle and 2.1–6.8 €/kg for electrolysis were obtained.     

A well to pump life cycle environmental impact assessment of some hydrogen production routes

In the present study, a comparative well to pump life cycle assessment is conducted on the hydrogen production routes of water electrolysis, biomass gasification, coal gasification, steam methane reforming, hydrogen production from ethanol and methanol. The CML 2001 impact assessment methodology is employed for assessment and comparison. Comparatively higher life cycle Carbon dioxide and Sulphur oxide emissions of 27.3 kg/kg H₂ and 50.0 g/kg H₂ respectively are determined for the water electrolysis hydrogen production route via U.S. electricity mix. In addition, the life cycle global warming potential of this route (28.6 kg CO_2eq/kg H₂) is found to be comparatively higher than other routes followed by coal gasification (23.7 kg CO_2eq/kg H₂)_. However, the ethanol based hydrogen production route is estimated to have comparatively higher life cycle emissions of nitrogen dioxide (19.6 g/kg H₂) and volatile organic compounds (10.3 g/kg H₂). Moreover, this route is determined to have a comparatively higher photochemical ozone creation potential of 0.0045 kg-ethene_eq/kg H₂ as well as eutrophication potential of 0.0043 kg PO_4eq/kg H_2. The results of this study are comparatively discussed to signify the importance of life cycle assessment in comparing the environmental sustainability of hydrogen production routes.     

Hydrogen from solar energy,a clean energy carrier from a sustainable source of energy

Solar energy is going to play a crucial role in the future energy scenario of the world that conducts interests to solar-to-hydrogen as a means of achieving a clean energy carrier. Hydrogen is a sustainable energy carrier, capable of substituting fossil fuels and decreasing carbon dioxide (CO₂) emission to save the world from global warming. Hydrogen production from ubiquitous sustainable solar energy and an abundantly available water is an environmentally friendly solution for globally increasing energy demands and ensures long-term energy security. Among various solar hydrogen production routes, this study concentrates on solar thermolysis, solar thermal hydrogen via electrolysis, thermochemical water splitting, fossil fuels decarbonization, and photovoltaic-based hydrogen production with special focus on the concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) system. Energy management and thermodynamic analysis of CPV-based hydrogen production as the near-term sustainable option are developed. The capability of three electrolysis systems including alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis, and solid oxide electrolysis for coupling to solar systems for H₂ production is discussed. Since the cost of solar hydrogen has a very large range because of the various employed technologies, the challenges, pros and cons of the different methods, and the commercialization processes are also noticed. Among three electrolysis technologies considered for postulated solar hydrogen economy, AWE is found the most mature to integrate with the CPV system. Although substantial progresses have been made in solar hydrogen production technologies, the review indicates that these systems require further maturation to emulate the produced grid-based hydrogen.     

Review and comparison of various hydrogen production methods based on costs and life cycle impact assessment indicators

Hydrogen is a clean, renewable secondary energy source. The development of hydrogen energy is a common goal pursued by many countries to combat the current global warming trend. This paper provides an overview of various technologies for hydrogen production from renewable and non-renewable resources, including fossil fuel or biomass-based hydrogen production, microbial hydrogen production, electrolysis and thermolysis of water and thermochemical cycles. The current status of development, recent advances and challenges of different hydrogen production technologies are also reviewed. Finally, we compared different hydrogen production methods in terms of cost and life cycle environmental impact assessment. The current mainstream approach is to obtain hydrogen from natural gas and coal, although their environmental impact is significant. Electrolysis and thermochemical cycle methods coupled with new energy sources show considerable potential for development in terms of economics and environmental friendliness.     

Life cycle assessment of clean ammonia synthesis from thermo-catalytic solar cracking of liquefied natural gas

Ammonia is considered a sustainable energy storage medium with zero carbon content. In this work, thermal catalytic cracking of liquefied natural gas (LNG) at elevated temperatures employing concentrated solar tower is considered to produce clean hydrogen (CO₂-free) and studied in terms of life cycle emissions. The generated hydrogen is utilized for clean ammonia synthesis in a Haber-Bosch reactor. The proposed system is initially assessed from a thermodynamic perspective, considering energy and exergy analyses emphasizing optimization of operating conditions. Then, the proposed system's life cycle assessment (LCA) is performed to analyze ammonia synthesis's environmental impacts. The aggregate environmental impact of the proposed system is quantified and compared with conventional production processes. Through the utilization of solar energy resources, ammonia production can be attained, avoiding high harmful emissions. The LCA study is carried out in GaBi software, and the selected impact assessment methodology is ReCiPe. The impact categories studied in this work are global warming potential (GWP), terrestrial acidification, human toxicity, and particulate matter formation potential. Considering 30 years of use phase and allocation, the predicted GWP is approximately 0.616 kg CO₂ (eq.)/kg NH₃, showing the potential to reduce up to 69.2% of the GWP compared to the global average value. Concerning human toxicity and fine particulate matter formation impact categories, the system produces about 3.32E-2 kg 1,4-DB (eq.) and 5.96E-4 kg PM2.5 (eq.), respectively, per kg NH₃. The results are further analyzed by dominance, break-even, and variation analyses in detail.     

Analysis of biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent using a pilot-scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket fixed-film reactor in life cycle perspective

This study aims to analyse the life-cycle assessment of biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) in a pilot-scale up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket fixed-film reactor. The SimaPro LCA software and ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method were used. Electricity usage was found to be a significant source of environmental impacts, with 50–98% of the total impacts. Furthermore, an improvement analysis was conducted, resulted in a reduction in all impacts, especially global warming impact with 77% reduction from 818 to 189 kg CO₂-eq per kg biohydrogen. While shifting the pilot reactor to Sarawak may further lessen the impact to 142 kg CO₂-eq due to cleaner grid in that region. Besides, if the environmental burden avoided due to usage of POME is considered, the global warming impact can be further reduced to 54.9 kg CO₂-eq. Thus, the pilot reactor has huge potential, especially in utilizing waste to produce bioenergy.     

新型太阳能制氢系统的分析与研究进展

本文对太阳能分解水制氢系统进行了理论和应用方面的分析，重点介绍了光解水的光热电化学分析。对近几年利用太阳能光解水制氢的进展进行了概述，并指出了它们目前存在的缺点。介绍了通过光热化学循环进行太阳能分解水制氢的新途径，并对未来的研究方向进行了展望。     

Hydrogen production from solar energy

Three alternatives for hydrogen production from solar energy have been analyzed on both efficiency and economic grounds. The analysis shows that the alternative using solar energy followed by thermochemical decomposition of water to produce hydrogen is the optimum one. The other schemes considered were the direct conversion of solar energy to electricity by silicon cells and water electrolysis, and the use of solar energy to power a vapor cycle followed by electrical generation and electrolysis. The capital cost of hydrogen via the thermochemical alternative was estimated at $575/kW of hydrogen output or $3·15/million Btu. Although this cost appears high when compared with hydrogen from other primary energy sources or from fossil fuel, environmental and social costs which favor solar energy may prove this scheme feasible in the future.     

Life cycle assessment of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production via nuclear energy

A life cycle assessment (LCA) of one proposed method of hydrogen production—the high temperature electrolysis of water vapor—is presented in this paper. High temperature electrolysis offers an advantage of higher energy efficiency over the conventional low-temperature alkaline electrolysis due to reduced cell potential and consequent electrical energy requirements. The primary energy source for the electrolysis will be advanced nuclear reactors operating at temperatures corresponding to those required for the high temperature electrolysis. The LCA examines the environmental impact of the combined advanced nuclear-high temperature electrolysis plant, focusing upon quantifying the emissions of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides per kilogram of hydrogen produced. The results are presented in terms of the global warming potential (GWP) and the acidification potential (AP) of the system. The GWP for the system is 2000 g carbon dioxide equivalent and the AP, 0.15 g equivalents of hydrogen ion equivalent per kilogram of hydrogen produced. The GWP and AP of this process are one-sixth and one-third, respectively, of those for the hydrogen production by steam reforming of natural gas, and are comparable to producing hydrogen from wind- or hydro-electricity powered conventional electrolysis.     

Upgrading waste heat from a cement plant for thermochemical hydrogen production

A calcium oxide/steam chemical heat pump (CHP) is presented in the study as a means to upgrade waste heat from industrial processes for thermochemical hydrogen production. The CHP is used to upgrade waste heat for the decomposition of copper oxychloride (CuO.CuCl₂) in a copper–chlorine (Cu–Cl) thermochemical cycle. A formulation is presented for high temperature steam electrolysis and thermochemical splitting of water using waste heat of a cement plant. Numerical models are presented for verifying the availability of energy for potential waste heat upgrading in cement plants. The optimal hydration and decomposition temperatures for the calcium oxide/steam reversible reaction of 485 K and 565 K respectively are obtained for the combined heat pump and thermochemical cycle. The coefficient of performance and overall efficiency of 4.6 and 47.8% respectively are presented and discussed for the CHP and hydrogen production from the cement plant.     

Experimental study and development of an improved sulfur–iodine cycle integrated with HI electrolysis for hydrogen production

The sulfur–iodine (SI or IS) thermochemical cycle assembled with solar or nuclear energy has been proposed as a large-scale, clean and renewable hydrogen production method. In present work, an improved SI cycle integrated with HI electrolysis for hydrogen production was developed according to experiments and simulation. The mathematical models of HI electrolysis using proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolytic cell was developed, and then the user-defined module of HI electrolysis was set up through Aspen Plus and verified by experimental data. After designing and simulating the new flowsheet of the SI cycle based on HI electrolysis, 10 L/h of H₂ and 5 L/h of O₂ were obtained. The theoretic thermal efficiency of flowsheet reached 25–42% in terms of the utilization of waste heat. An ideal thermal efficiency of 33.3% through the proper internal heat exchange in the flowsheet was determined. Sensitivity analyses of parameters in the system were conducted. Increasing proton transfer number of PEM electrolytic cell in HI section improved the thermal efficiency of SI cycle. The ratio of distillate to feed rate and the plate number of distillation column in H₂SO₄ section were the most sensitive factors to the heat duty of overall SI cycle. The proposed new flowsheet for SI cycle is competitive to the flowsheets previously proposed in the field of flowsheet simplification.     

A life cycle impact analysis of various hydrogen production methods for public transportation sector

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is an important task to reduce the adverse effects of climate change. A large portion of greenhouse gas emissions apparently originates from the transportation sector. Therefore, adopting cleaner technologies with lower emission footprints has become vital. For this reason, in this study, a life cycle impact analysis of hydrogen production technologies as an alternative to fossil fuels and the utilization of hydrogen in fuel cell electric buses is carried out. According to the results of this study, the operational contributions of internal combustion engines have a significant impact on life cycle impact analysis indicators. The global warming potentials of clean hydrogen production technologies result in much lower results compared to conventional hydrogen production technologies. Also, almost all indicators for biohydrogen production technologiess yield lower results because of the wastewater removal. The global warming potential results of hydrogen production methods are found to be 6.8, 1.9, 2.1, 0.5, 0.2, and 7.9 kg CO₂ eq./kg H₂ for PV electrolysis, wind electrolysis, high temperature electrolysis, dark fermentation, photo fermentation and conventional hydrogen production, respectively. However, the chemicals used in PV and wind turbine production increased the ecotoxicological indicators. On the other hand, hydrogen utilization in buses is a better option environmentally. The global warming potentials for PV electrolysis, wind electrolysis, high temperature electrolysis, dark fermentation, photo fermentation, conventional hydrogen, compressed natural gas bus, and diesel bus are found to be 0.060, 0.016, 0.018, 0.007, 0.006, 0.053, 0.082, and 0.125 kg CO₂ eq./p.km, respectively. The results are especially important in terms of reducing the effects at the source and optimizing the systems.