Mechanical properties and morphology of high-density polyethylene/linear low-density polyethylene blend

The binary blend of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) in the range of composition from 100% HDPE to 100% LLDPE has been investigated for tensile and flexural properties and the morphology in the deformed state on tensile fracture. Tensile properties (initial modulus, yield stress, and elongation-at-yield, ultimate tensile strength and elongation-at-break, and work of yield and work of rupture) and flexural properties (flexural modulus and flexural yield stress) are studied as a function of blend composition. Behavior, in terms of these properties, is distinguishable in three zones of blend composition, viz. (i) HDPE-rich blend, (ii) LLDPE-rich blend, and (iii) the middle zone. In zones (i) and (ii), the variations of these properties are more or less linear, whereas in the middle region [i.e., zone (iii)], there is a reversal of trends in variation or sometimes a behavior opposite to the expected one. The results are explained on the basis of the effects of cocrystallization and the presence of octene-containing segments in the amorphous phase. Scanning electron micrographs of the tensile fracture surfaces are presented to illustrate the occurrence of transverse bands interconnecting the fibrils.     

Crystallization kinetics of high-density polyethylene/linear low-density polyethylene blend

This article presents crystallization kinetics studies on a cocrystallizing polymer highdensity polyethylene (HDPE)/linear lowd-ensity polyethylene (LLDPE) blend. The nonisothermal crystallization exotherms obtained by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were analyzed to investigate the effect of cocrystallization on kinetics parameters, namely the Avrami exponent and activation energy. The regular change of Avrami exponent with blend composition from a value of about 3 corresponding to HDPE to a value of 2 corresponding to LLDPE is observed. A sheaf-like crystalline growth with variation of nucleation depending on blend composition is concluded from these results of DSC exotherm analysis in conjunction with the small-angle light scattering observations. The observed variation of activation energy of crystallization with blend composition suggests the role of interaction of side chains and comonomer units present in the LLDPE. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Crystallization behavior of high-density polyethylene/linear low-density polyethylene blend

Binary blend of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), prepared by melt mixing in an extruder, in the entire range of blending ratio, is studied for crystallization behavior by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction measurements. Cocrystallization was evident in the entire range of blend composition, from the single-peak character in both DSC crystallization exotherms and meltingendotherms and the X-ray diffraction peaks. A detailed analysis of DSC crystallization exotherms revealed a systematic effect of the addition of LLDPE on nucleation rate and the subsequently developed crystalline morphology, which could be distinguished in the three regions of blending ratio, viz, the “HDPE-rich blend,” “LLDPE-rich blend,” and the “middle range from 30–70% LLDPE content.” Variations in crystallinity, crystallite size, and d spacing are discussed in terms of differences in molecular structure of the components.     

Crystal and morphology development in immiscible nonpolar polymer blend nanocomposite based on low-density polyethylene and linear low-density polyethylene in presence of clay and compatibilizer

In this work, polyolefin-blend/clay nanocomposites based on low-density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), and organically modified clay (OC) were prepared by melt extrusion. Various grades of maleic anhydride (MA) grafted polyethylene (PE-g-MA) were used and examined as compatibilizers in these nanocomposites. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis showed that OC and compatibilizer affect the crystallization behavior of LDPE/LLDPE with different mechanisms. Thermodynamic calculations of wetting coefficient based on interfacial energy between OC, LD, and LL, Morphological characterization based on field emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, small angles X-ray scattering, and dynamic rheology measurements revealed that the compatibilizer and OC were localized at the interface of LDPE and LLDPE phases with a preferred tendency toward one phase. Results demonstrated that at a specific amount of OC, there is an optimum compatibilizer concentration to achieve nanodispersed OC and beyond that the compatibilizer causes a structural change in the polymer crystalline morphology. It was also found that the tensile property enhancement of LDPE/LLDPE/OC nanocomposites is closely related to the crystalline structure development made by incorporation of both OC and compatibilizer.     

Crystallization of high-density polyethylene–linear low-density polyethylene blend

The crystallization studies revealed that the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) formed strong cocrystalline mass when they were melt blended in a single screw extruder. The progress of crystallization was observed through a small-angle light scattering instrument, scanning electron microscope, and differential scanning calorimeter. Analysis showed that these constituents followed individual nucleation and combine growth of crystallites in blends. The growth of crystallites all through the blend compositions were two-dimensional. Interestingly, the crystallites resembled each other for a particular blend composition; however, they differ widely as the composition changes. The rate of crystallization depends greatly to the number of crystallites and their interfacial boundary in contact with the amorphous phase pool. The t_1/2 and percentage of crystallinity showed a mutually exclusive trend and were seen to be varied in the following three regions of blend composition: the HDPE-rich, the LLDPE-rich, and the middle region of blend composition. The percentage of crystallinity decreases in both the HDPE-rich and LLDPE-rich blends, and it showed a plateau value in the middle region of blend composition. The t_1/2 showed opposite trend to that of % crystallinity. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 69: 2599–2607, 1998     

Liquid-liquid phase separation in blends of a linear low-density polyethylene with a low-density polyethylene

A linear low-density butene copolymer, of overall branch content 3 mol %, has been blended with a low-density polyethylene. The low-density polyethylene has an overall branch content of 5 mol %, including both long and short branches. The two materials were blended in a wide range of compositions and the phase behavior investigated using indirect experimental methods, the examination of quenched blends by differential scanning calorimetry, and transmission electron microscopy. After quenching from temperatures up to 170°C, blends, of almost all compositions, show two crystal populations, separated on a micron scale. It is argued that this implies that the blends were phase separated in the melt before quenching. This behavior shows good agreement with predictions based on previous extensive studies of binary and ternary blends of linear with lightly branched polyethylenes. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65: 1921–1931, 1997     

Effect of cocrystallization on kinetic parameters of high-density polyethylene/linear low-density polyethylene blend

The isothermal crystallization kinetics of a binary melt blend of high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) is presented. An effort was made to understand the phenomenon of cocrystallization between these two constituting components of the blend with the help of kinetic parameters. The analysis based on the Avrami exponent entails that both HDPE and LLDPE undergo individual seeding of nuclei and they merge with each other in the growth process to form cocrystallites. The incorporation of the LLDPE segment in the HDPE crystallites progressively dilutes the properties of HDPE in the blend. The half-time of crystallization (t_1/2) shows variation in three distinct stages: The t_1/2 increases slowly in the region of 0–30% LLDPE content (HDPE-rich blend), remains constant in the 30–70% LLDPE-containing region (middle region of blend composition), and increases sharply thereafter. These variations of t_1/2 quite appreciably explain the change in % crystallinity, the Avrami exponent, and crystallite-size distribution. These observations were further supported by the small-angle light-scattering experiment. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Hot tack of metallocene catalyzed polyethylene and low-density polyethylene blend

Films made of metallocene catalyzed polyethylene (mPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and their blend were prepared to investigate how LDPE influences the hot tack of film. Experimental results showed hot tack is independent of film thickness. The addition of 30 wt % of LDPE can increase the hot tack of mPE film. The thermograms of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) suggest the respective partial melting and recrystallization of those smaller size crystals at the bond forming and joint fracture stages play very important roles. The large amount of partial melting and high flow may induce a higher degree of molecular diffusion. Higher residual crystallinity and recrystallization at the hot tack testing process may induce higher resistant to bond fracture. Those two positive influences show that the mPE/LDPE film has the higher hot tack. The evidence from optical (higher optical transmission and lower haze) as well as viscoelastic (higher storage modulus and lower melt viscosity) properties further support this hypothesis. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 1769–1773, 1999     

Dynamically vulcanized thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites based on linear low-density polyethylene/styrene-butadiene rubber/nanoclay/bitumen: morphology and rheological behavior

Dynamically crosslinked thermoplastic elastomer nanocomposites were synthesized as modifier for the bitumen binder-based asphalts. Linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) and styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), with the ratio of 80/20, bitumen, and organically modified clay (OC) were all melt mixed in the presence of the sulfur curing system. The proposed mixing was carried out in an internal mixer at 160 °C with a rotor speed of 120 rpm. To enhance the molecular interactions between the polymer phases and the clay silicate layers, maleic anhydride-grafted LLDPE (PE-g-MA) with the maleiation degree of 50% was also incorporated into the mixture. Observation of the composite samples, using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM), revealed the matrix dispersed type of morphology for all dynamically vulcanized samples. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examinations evidenced the exfoliation of the clay silicate layers with good dispersion. Rheomechanical spectrometry (RMS) was performed on the prepared nanocomposites. All dynamically vulcanized nanocomposites comprising 2.5% of OC exhibited shear-thinning behavior and non-terminal characteristics with a low frequency range. These indicate the formation of three-dimensional physical networks by the clay nanolayers throughout the LLDPE matrix. The presence of the bitumen in the composition of the prepared nanocomposites improved the flowability of the samples. This is a promising feature of the prepared nanocomposites to be used as an elastic and resistant modifier in the composition of the bitumen-based asphalts.

     

Elongation viscosity estimates of linear low-density polyethylene/ low-density polyethylene blends

The elongational viscosity (EV) of two series of linear low-density polyethylene/low-density polyethylene blends was estimated using an entry flow analysis. The difference, t ? n, between the power law index t of the elongational viscosity and the power law index n of the viscosity, is proportional to the LDPE content for both series of blends investigated. Comparison of the EV of the LLDPE/LDPE blend estimated from the analysis of the flow into an orifice die to the EV value estimated from the analysis of the flow into a capillary die with a flat entry, showed that the difference in geometry had little effect on the EV estimates.     

Phase morphology and compatibilization mechanism in ternary polymer blend systems of polyethylene terephthalate,polyolefin rubber,and ionomer

The phase morphology and the mechanism of the compatibilization in ternary blends of PET/EBM (ethylene buten rubber)/ionomer (partially neutralized ethylene and methyl methacrylic acid copolymer, EMAA) are examined. Applying the repulsion idea in random copolymer, the ionomer was selected as an encapsulating agent to compatibilize PET/EBM blend. As anticipated, the ionomer can encapsulate EBM in PET matrix and effectively compatibilize PET and EBM. The results of droplet sandwich experiments verified that the actual driving force for the encapsulation is wettability. In addition, this wettablility was found to be realized by the contribution of the polar and nonpolar units in the ionomer: The polar units decrease the interfacial tension between PET and the ionomer, and the nonpolar units decrease that between EBM and the ionomer. The metal ions in the ionomer have little influence on the wettability, and consequently EMAA can encapsulate EBM even when unneutralized. The efficiency of the compatibilization, on the other hand, is not determined by the wettability only, and the metal ions play an important role. EMAA can effectively compatibilize EBM and PET only when neutralized. This compatibilization effectiveness of the ionomer is supposedly due to the strong interaction between PET and the metal ions. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1567–1576, 2004     

Comparison between a linear and a branched low-density polyethylene

Two low-density polyethylenes, a linear low-pressure (LLDPE) and a branched high-pressure (LDPE), have been compared. Their shear and extensional behavior and melt fracture phenomena have been investigated, and some mechanical and optical properties of their blown films have been measured. The rheological analysis showed major differences between the samples, both in shear viscosity and in elongational viscosity. The LLDPE exhibited two types of melt fracture, the first of which—a fine scale extrudate roughness—was not shown by the LDPE and appeared at a very low shear rate. The concomitance in LLDPE of a high shear viscosity and a low elongational viscosity and the presence of melt fracture at low shear rate resulted in its more difficult processing into film. The mechanical properties of the LLDPE film approached those of high-density polyethylene while the optical characteristics were in the range of LDPE. Such a coexistence of properties makes LLDPE an interesting material for film production.     

Gas barrier and morphology characteristics of linear low-density polyethylene and two different polypropylene films

In this research, linear low-density polyethylene (PE-LLD), cast polypropylene (PPcast), and bioriented coextruded polypropylene (BOPP) were used as polymeric materials. Permeability, diffusivity, and solubility of N₂, O₂, and CO₂ through above polymers were obtained at different temperatures. The structure and thermal–mechanical features of the films were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The permeability, diffusivity, solubility, and their temperature dependency were studied by correlations with gas molecule properties. The highest permeation coefficients (>3.8 × 10⁻⁸ cm³ cm⁻¹ s⁻¹ bar⁻¹) are obtained for PPcast at 60 °C. Activation energy for permeation follows the sequence: N₂ > O₂ > CO₂ for PE-LLD and PPcast. On the other hand, the diffusion activation energy follows the order: O₂ > CO₂ > N₂ and N₂ > CO₂ > O₂ for PE-LLD and PPcast, respectively. In the case of BOPP, activation energy follows the sequence: O₂ > CO₂ > N₂; CO₂ > N₂ > O₂; and O₂ > CO₂ > N₂ for permeation, diffusion, and heat of sorption, respectively.     

Blending of natural rubber with linear low-density polyethylene

Blends of natural rubber (NR) with linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) were prepared by melt blending of the materials in a plasticorder mixer at various temperatures around the melting point of LLDPE and at various mixing rates. The optimum processing conditions were a temperature of about 135°C and a mixing rate of 55 rpm. The tensile properties, stress and strain, of the blend had improved significantly with the addition of liquid natural rubber (LNR) into the blend. For blends with compositions around 50% NR, about 10–15% LNR produced the most significant improvement in the physical properties. Welldispersed plastic particles in a rubber matrix were strongly indicated in these samples. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of the samples also indicated an increase in the homogeneity of the mixes with the addition of LNR. A single glass transition temperature of about?55°C for the blend was observed via dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Interfacial linking between the NR and LLDPE phases was attributed to the presence of active groups on the polyisoprene chain of LNR, which induced the interphase reaction between the NR and LLDPE phases. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Nonlinear behavior of linear low-density polyethylene

To predict the response of polyethylene thin films subjected to stress for a long time, it is necessary to understand the influence of stress on either the relaxation modulus or creep compliance. Extensive testing has been conducted on 20-micron-thick samples of a particular linear low-density polyethylene film at temperatures from 23°C to −50°C. When reduced to creep compliance and compared with results from dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), the influence of nonlinearities in the response function is apparent. However, the use of a two-step loading procedure has produced sufficient data to discriminate between the effect of stress on amplitude and time on the creep compliance. It has been found that a master curve of compliance generated by DMA equipment may be used in conjunction with certain nonlinear functions to accurately predict the response of the polyethylene. Perhaps of more importance is the observation that the principles of simple time-temperature superposition, commonly used with linear viscoelastic characterization, are insufficient for use with polyethylene films at most stress levels of interest.     

Gas permeability of thin dense films from polymer blend of thermoplastic elastomer and polyolefin

Stretched thin films composed of a thermoplastic elastomer, a polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene butylene)‐block‐polystyrene triblock copolymer (SEBS), and polyolefins, poly(ethylene‐co‐ethylacrylate) and poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene), were obtained by blow‐molding, uniaxial stretching, and cooling to room temperature and the gas permeability of the stretched films was investigated. When the as‐blown annealed film was subjected to uniaxial stretching in the machine direction, P_O2 and P_N2 increased with an increase in the stretching ratio K and approached a constant value at high stretching ratios. In addition, P_O2/P_N2 decreased gradually with K and approached a value of 2.95–3.0. The reason for this unique gas permeation behavior is that the molecular mobility of poly(ethylene butylene) chains in a direction normal to the film increases and reaches an equilibrium state at around K = 4.5. The change in gas permeability of the stretched films can be explained using a deformation model for the SEBS matrix. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 39386.     

Crystallization,structure, morphology,and properties of linear low-density polyethylene blends made with different comonomers

Linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) 7042, which has a butene comonomer, is widely used but has poor tear and dart strengths. For practical applications, small amounts of other materials can be blended with 7042 to effectively improve its properties. In this study, four blend resins and films (cast and compressed films) were prepared by blending 7042 with four LLDPEs (2045G, 9030, 23F, and 9085) in 8:2 ratios. The results indicated that after blending 2045G, 23F, or 9030 with 7042, the crystallization ability of the three blends was significantly suppressed and crystal size decreased. Moreover, the molecular chain can pass though more lamellar stacks in the blends, leading to an increased tie-chain concentration. Therefore, the tear and dart impact strength of the blend films improved. In contrast, the crystallization ability of the 7042/9085 blend was only slightly suppressed and did not significantly impact its properties. These findings contribute to our understanding of the relationship between material structures and properties, demonstrating that LLDPE blends can be used to improve the tear and dart strengths of 7042.     

Effects of the processing conditions and blending with linear low-density polyethylene on the properties of low-density polyethylene films

Effects of blending low-density polyethylene (LDPE) with linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) were studied on extrusion blown films. The tensile strength, the tear strength, the elongation at break, as well as haze showed more or less additivity between the properties of LDPE and LLDPE except in the range of 20–40% where synergistic effects were observed. The LLDPE had higher tensile strength and elongation at break than did the LDPE in both test directions, as well as higher tear strength in the transverse direction. The impact energies of the LLDPE and the LDPE were approximately the same, but the tear strength of the LLDPE was lower than that of LDPE in the machine direction. The comparative mechanical properties strongly depend on the processing conditions and structural parameters such as the molecular weight and the molecular weight distribution of both classes of materials. The LLDPE in this study had a higher molecular weight in comparison to the LDPE of the study, as implied from its lower melt flow index (MFI) in comparison to that of the LDPE. The effects of processing conditions such as the blow-up ratio (BUR) and the draw-down ratio (DDR) were also studied at 20/80 (LLDPE/LDPE) ratio. Tensile strength, elongation at break, and tear strength in both directions became equalized, and the impact energy decreased as the BUR and the DDR approached each other.     

Elongational flow properties of low-density polyethylene and linear low-density polyethylene from nonisothermal melt spinning experiments

Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and also linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) resins can be characterized by the degree of strain hardening and down-gaging during elongation. A new method for the determination of the apparent elongational flow characteristics is presented. In a small scale apparatus, a molten monofilament is stretched under nonisothermal conditions similar to those found in tubular film extrusion. Measurement of resistance to elongational flow and apparent elongational strain rates permit the comparison of the process-ability of different resins under specified conditions. The effect of melt temperature and extension ratio are examined. The importance of the molecular structure of both LDPE and LLDPE resins on these properties is also outlined.     

Effects of mixing on morphology,rheology, and mechanical properties of blends of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene with linear low-density polyethylene

Various blends of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) with linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) were prepared in an internal (Banbury type) mixer, a static mixer, and by solvent blending. Two mixing techniques, namely simultaneous and sequential loading methods, were employed with the internal mixer. In the former case, the two polymer components were simultaneously loaded at 180°C and mixed. The latter method allowed the UHMWPE component to diffuse at 250°C and cooled it down to 180°C, then the LLDPE component was added subsequently and mixed. Rheological and mechanical properties of these blends are profoundly affected by the mixing techniques used. Rheological results shows yield characteristics of UHMWPE/LLDPE blends, in particular in blends of high UHMWPE contents. Tensile properties of sequentially loaded blends vary more or less linearly with blend compositions. However, negative or positive deviations are seen in the simultaneously prepared blends. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies indicate that co-crystallization takes place between UHMWPE and LLDPE components in sequentially mixed blends. DSC and small-angle light scattering (SALS) studies show that separate crystallization takes place in simultaneously blended compounds as a result of poor mixing. It seems that the sequential loading method provides more homogeneous compounds than those of simultaneous blending.