Distributed clinical neurophysiology

We have performed a clinical phase I trial of a combination treatment with paclitaxel given as 3-hour infusion and cisplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. Doses administered ranged from 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel/75 mg/m2 cisplatin to 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin. Twenty-four patients have been entered into this study. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 225-250 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin. The dose-limiting toxicity of this regimen was myelosuppression (granulocytopenia). Neurosensory and neuromotor toxicity was moderate. However, analyses of threshold electrotonus studies indicated subclinical neurotoxicity in most patients. One patient receiving 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin developed grade 3 motor-neurotoxicity. Orthostatic hypotension was observed in 8 patients receiving doses of 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/100 mg/m2 cisplatin or higher. Objective responses were observed at paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/ cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 5; complete response in 1 patient), paclitaxel 200 mg/ m2/cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 3; partial response in 3 patients) and at paclitaxel 225 mg/m2/cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (n = 8; partial response in 1 patient). Eleven additional patients had stable disease. We conclude that paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion followed by cisplatin is an active regimen in advanced head and neck cancer and that orthostatic hypotension may be a potentially significant clinical toxicity.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer

This is a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced gastric cancer patients. The patients, refractory to the PELF regimen (5-FU, leucovorin, cisplatin, epidoxorubicin), received weekly 5-FU at the fixed dose of 500 mg/m2, and escalating doses of paclitaxel every 3 weeks with a starting dose of 150 mg/m2 given as in 3-h infusion. The dose was escalated by 25 mg/m2 every 3 patients. Fifteen patients entered the study. The upper paclitaxel dose (225 mg/m2) was given to 6 patients. Up to this dose, no severe toxicity (grade 3-4) was recorded. Apart from alopecia, grade 1-2 leukopenia occurred in 5 patients and grade 1-2 neurotoxicity in 2 patients. All patients were evaluable for response (at least 2 cycles): 2 patients achieved an objective response (200 and 225 mg/m2). In 6 patients, treatment resulted in notable relief from symptoms. Out-patient paclitaxel given over 3 h and 5-FU may be combined safely for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. The recommended doses for phase II study are paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 and 5-FU 500 mg/m2.     

Phase I study of a weekly 1 h infusion of paclitaxel in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

The majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma will develop either unresectable or metastatic disease and, therefore, are candidates for systemic chemotherapy. Only a few chemotherapeutic agents have shown documented activity in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and there is clearly a need for the evaluation of new active drugs. Therefore, we performed a phase I trial with a weekly schedule of paclitaxel in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. 16 patients with documented progression of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included. After premedication, paclitaxel was given as a 1 h infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36 representing one treatment cycle. The cycle was repeated every 50 days. The starting dose was 70 mg/m2 and the doses were escalated in steps of 10 mg/m2/week. A minimum of 3 patients were treated at each dose level. All treatment was given on an out-patient basis. Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at a dose of 100 mg/m2/week with 2 of 6 patients treated at that dose level having WHO grade 4 neutropenia. Other toxic side-effects were only mild. 1 partial response and 9 cases with disease stabilisation were observed in 16 patients with initially progressive disease. We, therefore, conclude that the recommended dose for a further phase II trial in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is 90 mg/m2/week. These data indicate that paclitaxel given at this dose and schedule might have activity in hepatocellular carcinoma and further investigation in phase II trials is warranted.     

Phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: a double modulation proposal

Twenty-six patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with UFT and leucovorin (LV). On day 1, patients received LV 500 mg/m2 in IV infusion, followed by 15 mg/12 h for 13 days. On days 1 to 14, patients took oral UFT twice daily. Three cycles were given every 28 days, unless grade III-IV toxicity appeared. The initial dose of UFT (200 mg/day) was increased until 800 mg/day. Dose limiting toxicities were stomatitis, diarrhea and epigastralgia. The maximum tolerated dose of UFT was 390 +/- 10 mg/m2. Three out of 24 evaluable patients achieved a partial response and 1 a complete response with UFT doses of 260 to 390 mg/m2. These results warrant confirmation in phase II studies.     

Results of a phase II trial with second-line cystemustine at 60 mg/m2 in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a trial of the EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group

The aim of this phase II trial was to examine the efficacy of a new nitrosourea, cystemustine, in soft tissue sarcoma. Between January 1990 and March 1991, 32 pretreated patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma were enrolled. Cystemustine was given every 2 weeks at 60 mg/m2 via a 15-min i.v. infusion. All eligible patients were considered evaluable for response and toxicity (WHO criteria). Of the 32 enrolled patients, 4 were ineligible, leaving 28 evaluable patients. All but 1 had been pretreated: 6 with adjuvant chemotherapy, 18 patients with first-line palliative chemotherapy without nitrosourea, 3 with both treatments, and 18 had received radiotherapy. Median age was 54 years (range 20-73) and median performance status was 1 (0-2). One partial response (PR, duration 12 weeks), 2 stable disease and 25 progressions were observed, giving an overall response rate of 3.57% (confidence interval: 0.1-18.4%). Toxicity was mild, and was mainly neutropenia (no grade 3 or 4), thrombocytopenia (3.57% grade 3 and grade 4) and nausea-vomiting (no grade 3 or 4). It should be noted that the treatment for the patient who obtained a PR was third line with no previous response. Cystemustine with this schedule appears to have a low clinical activity and toxicity in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.     

Purification and characterization of human sarcomeric mitochondrial creatine kinase

PURPOSE: A dose-escalation study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) combined with fixed-dose cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with or without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicities and response. On day 1, CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous (I.V.) infusion, which was followed 2 hours later by a 120-minute I.V. infusion of cisplatin 80 mg/m2. CPT-11 alone at the same dose was administered again on day 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression was observed. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The MTD of this combination was CPT-11 80 mg/m2. At this dose level, 16.7% of patients (two of 12) had leukopenia of less than 1,000/microL, 66.7% (eight of 12) had neutropenia of less than 500/microL, and 16.7% (two of 12) had severe diarrhea of grade 4 during the first course. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Ten patients achieved a partial response (PR), and the overall response rate was 41.7% among 24 patients (95% confidence interval, 21.9% to 61.4%). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose and schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. This combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin, considered to be active against advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxicity, should be further assessed in a phase II study.     

One-hour paclitaxel plus carboplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of a multicentre, phase II trial

The aim of this phase II study was to determine the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel (administered by 1-h infusion) and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer when used in a multicentre, community-based treatment setting. 100 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer were treated between March 1995 and February 1996. All patients had Karnofsky performance status 70-100, measurable disease and adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function. All patients received intravenous (i.v.) paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 by 1-h infusion followed immediately by carboplatin at a targeted area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 6.0 using the Calvert formula. Courses were repeated every 21 days. Colony stimulating factors were not used routinely. 38 of 94 evaluable patients (40%) had objective responses to treatment (3 complete responses, 35 partial responses). An additional 32 patients had stable disease at initial re-evaluation. Weight gain during treatment was experienced by 47% of patients with objective response or stable disease. The median survival in this group of 100 patients was 8 months, with an actuarial 1-year survival of 42%. Leucopenia was common, but hospitalisation for treatment of neutropenia and fever occurred in only 3% of courses. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy was common, but usually appeared after the third or fourth course and was severe (grade 3) in only 15% of patients. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicity was uncommon. There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis. This large multicentre community-based phase II trial demonstrated the efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. When paclitaxel is given by 1-h infusion, this regimen is easily administered in the outpatient setting.     

Cardiovascular disease prevention in eastern Europe

A phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by methotrexate (MTX) (with leucovorin (LV) rescue) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced (inoperable) or metastatic gastric carcinoma. From July 1993 through August 1996, 36 patients with advanced gastric carcinoma received a regimen that consisted of: MTX 200 mg/m2 diluted in 250 ml normal saline by intravenous infusion over 20 minutes at hour 0; 5-FU 1,200 mg/m2 intravenous push injection at hour 20. Beginning 24 hours after MTX administration all patients received LV 15 mg/m2 intramuscularly every 6 hours for six doses. Cycles were repeated every 15 days. One patient was not assessable for response. Objective regression was observed in 15 of 37 patients (43%; 95% confidence interval, 26%-60%). One patient (3%) achieved complete response and 14 (40%) achieved partial response. No change was recorded in 14 patients (40%) and progressive disease was noted in six patients (17%). The median time to treatment failure was 7 months and the median survival was 12 months. Toxicity was within acceptable limits but one therapy-related death resulting from severe leukopenia occurred. The dose-limiting toxicity was mucositis. Five episodes of grade 3 or 4 stomatitis were observed and caused dosage modifications of MTX and 5-FU. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU by MTX appears as an attractive modality in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further investigation both in experimental and clinical fields is needed to clearly define its role and to design the best modulatory strategy.     

Oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (folfox) in pretreated patients with metastatic advanced cancer. The GERCOD

Preliminary studies suggest synergy between oxaliplatin and fluorouracil (5-FU). To assess this issue, we performed a study in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) resistant to leucovorin and 5-FU. Regimen consisted of oxaliplatin day 1, 130 mg/m2 every two cycles (folfox 1) or 100 mg/m2/cycle (folfox 2) or 85 mg/m2/cycle (folfox 3) and leucovorin 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion, followed by 5-FU 22 h infusion 1.5-2 g/m2 for two consecutive days every 2 weeks. One hundred and thirteen patients have been treated. One complete response (CR) and 32 partial responses (PRs) were observed for an overall response rate of 29.2%. Sixty-seven patients had prior documented progression while receiving the same schedule of leucovorin and 5-FU than the one used in the folfox regimens, among them 18 had PRs (26.9%). The best response rate was observed in patients treated with the folfox 2 regimen: 41.7%. From start of folfox, median progression-free survival was 6 months and median survival 13 months. Limiting toxicities were peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. Fifty-four percent of the patients experienced WHO toxicity > or = grade 3 with the folfox1 regimen, 45% with the folfox2 and 40% with the folfox3. The folfox regimens achieve a high response rate in pretreated patients with CRC. Further studies are needed to determine the best oxaliplatin dose-intensity.     

Very high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral stem cell support in advanced ovarian cancer

20 patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer were submitted to induction chemotherapy (ICT) (40 mg/m2 cisplatin, days 1-4; 1.5 g/m2 cyclophosphamide, day 4; every 4 weeks for 2 cycles) followed by intensified CT (100 mg/m2 cisplatin, day 1; 650 mg/m2 etoposide, day 2; 1.8 g/m2 carboplatin by 24 h infusion, day 3). Haematological support consisted of autologous peripheral stem cells (APSC) and bone marrow (ABM) transplant (T) in 16 and 4 patients, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 19 for pathological response (PR), one patient dying of systemic mycosis after ABMT. Severe (grade 3-4) non-haematological toxic effects were gastrointestinal (100%), neurological (10%) and hepatic (10%). PR was observed in 84% of patients (complete response 37%, partial response with microscopic residual disease 26%, partial response with macroscopic residual disease 21%). Five year overall survival was 60% and progression-free survival was 51% with 9 patients still disease-free (DFS). APSCT significantly reduced the duration of aplasia compared with ABMT, and toxicity was acceptable in those patients undergoing APSCT. The prolonged DFS in patients showing PCR suggests that this new approach may have a therapeutic impact.     

Vinorelbine and epirubicin in metastatic breast cancer. A dose finding study

The aim of the study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine given as one or two weekly doses in combination with epirubicin 60 mg/m2 every third week. The MTD was defined as the dose resulting in a WHO grade III or IV leucopenia exceeding 50% of patients. Patients were treated in groups of 10 at escalating doses of vinorelbine. The number of patients at the final dose level was expanded to 20. The dose of epirubicin was kept constant at 60 mg/m2 every third week. At dose level 1, 15 mg/m2 vinorelbine was given on day 1 at level 2, 20 mg/m2 was given on day 1 and at level 3, 20 mg/m2 was given on days 1 and 8. The MTD was reached at dose level 3. WHO haematological toxicity grade IV occurred in 0, 10 and 45% and grade III at 60, 30 and 30% of patients at dose levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Despite the common occurrence of grade IV haematological toxicity, only two serious infections were noted. Non-haematological toxicity of vinorelbine included neurotoxicity, manifesting as muscle weakness, constipation and paresthesias in the majority of patients. Neurotoxicity was usually mild and did not require treatment discontinuation. Phlebitis at the injection site was troublesome in many patients. Alopecia and nausea, probably due to epirubicin, occurred in most patients. The response rates were 22% (95% CI (confidence interval) 3-60%), 40% (12-74%) and 60% (36-81%) at levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively (non-significant).     

Loss of biological activity due to Glu-->Arg mutation at residue 11 of the B subunit of cholera toxin

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of edatrexate (E), an antifolate agent with enhanced in vitro antitumor activity as compared with methotrexate (M), when given in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and filgrastim (G-CSF) to patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) following three different subsequently developed schedules. Schedule 1 was patterned after the MVAC regimen, a combination chemotherapy program with activity against different epithelial malignancies, and consisted of E, 40 mg/m2/day, days 1/15/22; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2/15/22; A, 30 mg/m2/ day, day 2; C, 70 mg/m2/day, day 2; repeated every 28 days. Schedules 2 and 3 were designed to avoid observed dose-limiting toxicity on schedule 1 consisting of transient elevation of serum creatinine levels and delayed myelosuppression. Schedule 2 consisted of E, 40 or 60 mg/ m2/day, days 1 and 15; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2 and 15; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 28 days. Schedule 3 consisted of E, 60 to 120 mg/m2/day, day 1; V, 3 mg/m2/day, day 2; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 21 days. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day was given to all patients subcutaneously until the absolute neutrophil count was greater than 10,000/microL postnadir. Three patients were treated on schedule 1, 10 on schedule 2 (four at an E dose of 40 mg/m2/day and six at an E dose of 60 mg/m2/day), and 24 on schedule 3 (six at each of the following E dosages: 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2/day). RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and transient elevation of serum creatinine values were observed in two of three patients treated on schedule 1. A dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia was noted in two of six patients treated on schedule 2 at an edatrexate dose of 60 mg/m2/day. Two of six patients treated on schedule 3 at an edatrexate dose of 120 mg/m2/day had a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis (one patient) and grade 3 cytopenia (one patient). Nineteen of 37 patients with evaluable or measurable disease had a response to treatment (response rate 51%, 95% confidence intervals = 35%-67%). Nine of 15 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer responded, including one complete remission (response rate 60%, confidence intervals = 35%-85%). A median survival of 517 days (confidence interval = 163-808 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 60% (confidence interval = 35%-85%) was seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose of edatrexate is 100 mg/m2/day when administered as part of the EVAC/G-CSF program following schedule 3. Promising antineoplastic activity against non-small cell lung carcinomas was observed, and a phase II study is planned.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in women with advanced breast cancer: an active regimen with limiting neurotoxicity

PURPOSE: A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate and make further observations about the toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the breast with no more than one chemotherapeutic treatment for advanced disease. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered as a 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously on day 3 until WBC recovery. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients continued to receive therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four patients entered the trial. Forty-two patients were assessable for response. Nineteen patients (43%) had no prior chemotherapy and 41 had no chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The median number of cycles administered per patient was five (range, one to seven). There were five complete responses (CRs) (11.9%) and 17 partial responses (PRs) (40.5%), with an overall response rate of 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.4% to 68.0%). Nine patients had stage III disease. The response rate for this group was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.0% to 92.5%), with three CRs and three PRs. Among 35 patients with stage IV disease, there were two CRs and 14 PRs, with an overall response rate of 48.5% (95% CI, 30.8% to 66.5%). Overall, the median response duration was 10.6 months. Thirty patients (68%) developed transient grade 4 neutropenia. Cumulative neuropathy was the major dose-limiting toxicity. After five cycles of chemotherapy, 96% of patients had at least grade 1 neurotoxicity and 52% had at least grade 2 neurotoxicity. One patient had a toxic death after cycle 1 of therapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with advanced breast cancer is an active regimen. However, the cumulative neurotoxicity was significant and dose-limiting in the majority of patients.     

Treatment of patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract with ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin: a phase II trial

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP) was conducted in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) to assess its efficacy and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic or unresectable TCC were treated with ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2/d for 3 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28-day treatment cycle. Therapy was continued for a maximum of six cycles. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factor (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [rhG-CSF]) was given on days 6 to 17 of each cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 29 assessable patients (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 92%) demonstrated a major response (six complete [CR] and 17 partial [PR]) with response durations that ranged from 5 to 24+ months. Five patients with T4 bladder primary tumors had a major response, two with pathologic CR. At a median follow-up duration of 17.9 months, nine (31%) patients remain disease-free (range, 10+ to 24+). Hematologic toxicity included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia; febrile neutropenia was observed in 17% of patients and 4% of cycles. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included alopecia, allergy (3%), renal insufficiency (13%), and neuropathy (10%). Dose reductions or drug omissions were necessary for adverse events in seven (23%) patients. CONCLUSION: ITP is an active, well-tolerated regimen in previously untreated patients with TCC of the urothelial tract. Further study of this regimen in patients with both TCC and non-transitional-cell urothelial tumors is ongoing.     

High-dose edatrexate with oral leucovorin rescue: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study in adults with advanced cancer

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of i.v. edatrexate with p.o. leucovorin. Thirty-one adults with advanced solid tumors received edatrexate as a 2-h infusion, once a week for 3 weeks, recycled every 28 days. p.o. leucovorin (10 mg/m2, every 6 h for 10 doses) began 24 h later. All had urinary alkalinization and p.o. hydration. Nine dosage levels ranging from 120 to 3750 mg/m2 were explored. Fatigue, epistaxis, nausea/emesis, mucositis, rash, myalgias, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transient elevations of serum aspartate transferase were observed. Leukoencephalopathy with clinical manifestations occurred in two patients (one had prior cranial irradiation). Pharmacokinetic studies carried out at the 120- and 1080-mg/m2 dose levels revealed no significant difference in the elimination half-life at the two dose levels studied and no significant intrapatient variability between day 1 and day 8 edatrexate administration. Serum edatrexate levels measured using a dihydrofolate reductase inhibition assay correlated with those by high-performance liquid chromatography. Three major and two minor antitumor responses occurred. The maximum tolerated dose was 3750 mg/m2, with grade 3 or 4 leukopenia (one patient), stomatitis (one patient), and leukoencephalopathy (one patient). Because of the occurrence of leukoencephalopathy, further study of high-dose edatrexate with leucovorin rescue is not recommended.     

Phase I study of daily times five topotecan and single injection of cisplatin in patients with previously untreated non-small-cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan in combination with cisplatin, to describe the principal toxicities, and to define the maximally-tolerated doses of the drugs in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed to evaluate escalated doses of topotecan (starting at 0.75 mg/m2/day) as a 30-minute infusion daily for five consecutive days with a fixed clinically-relevant dose of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin given on day 1, every three weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen chemotherapy-naive patients entered the study and 14 were evaluable for toxicity. All 11 patients treated at the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level of 0.75/75 mg/m2, experienced at least one episode of grade 4 neutropenia. For six patients, absolute neutrophil counts were below 500/ml for more than five days, and two of them developed a grade 4 thrombocytopenia. At the next higher topotecan/cisplatin dose level (1.0/75 mg/m2), grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than five days occurred in all three evaluable patients, including one patient who expired due to a severe neutropenia associated with sepsis. Non-hematologic toxicities, predominantly nausea and vomiting, were mild to moderate in severity and manageable. Four patients had partial responses (30.7%; 95% confidence interval (9%-61%) of relatively short duration. CONCLUSION: Both severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia precluded dose escalation of topotecan and cisplatin administered on this schedule. In previously untreated patients, the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level (0.75/75 mg/m2), was associated with intolerable myelosuppression, and, therefore, the dose levels evaluated in this study cannot be recommended for subsequent phase II investigations. The high toxicity of this schedule and the recent understanding of the pharmacokinetic interaction between those drugs may encourage the investigation of the alternate sequence of cisplatin after TPT in phase II studies.     

Preliminary report of the activity of docetaxel in advanced or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the cervix

Eighteen patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix were treated with i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 over 1 h every 21 days. No patient received prior chemotherapy, except as a radiation sensitizer. Median age was 42 years (range 30-58) and Zubrod performance status was 1 (0-2). Ten (59%) patients had prior surgery and 11 (65%) had prior radiation therapy. Sixteen patients were evaluable for response. Two patients had a partial response (13%; 95% CI 0-32%) and eight (50%; 95% CI 23-77%) had stable disease. Dose reduction to 75 mg/m2 was required in 10 patients and to 55 mg/m2 in one patient. Granulocytopenia was the major hematopoietic toxicity (31% grade 3 and 44% grade 4). Docetaxel is active in patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix and may be tolerable at this dose schedule.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: To assess the activity and toxicity profile of combined taxol (paclitaxel), ifosfamide, and platinum (cisplatin) (TIP) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Recurrent or metastatic head and neck SCC patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-hour infusion on day 1; ifosfamide 1,000 mg/m2 in a 2-hour infusion on days 1 through 3; mesna 600 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3; and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 to 4 weeks. All were premedicated with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not permitted. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were assessable for response and toxicity; 53 for survival (local-regional recurrence alone in 57% and distant metastasis with or without local-regional recurrence in 43%). Overall response rate was 58% (30 of 52) of patients; complete response rate was 17% (nine of 52) of patients, with six complete responses that continued for a median 15.7+ months. Median follow-up of all patients was 17.7 months. Median survival was 8.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1 to 17.5 months). Toxicity was relatively well tolerated and caused no deaths. The most frequent moderate-to-severe toxicity (90% of patients) was transient grades 3 to 4 neutropenia; neutropenic fever occurred in 27%. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in three patients, none had grade 4. Grade 3 mucositis occurred in only one patient, none had grade 4. CONCLUSION: TIP had major activity in this setting, with a 58% objective response rate, 17% complete response rate, durable complete responses (six of nine persisting), and relatively well-tolerated toxicity, with no toxic deaths. The activity of TIP, a novel taxol-cisplatin-based regimen, in recurrent or metastatic head and neck SCC should be confirmed in a phase III trial.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of weekly doxorubicin and 1 h infusional paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer

Doxorubicin and paclitaxel both display strong antitumor activity in the treatment of breast cancer. The optimal schedule of this combination, however, remains undefined. In this phase I and pharmacologic study, we administered weekly 12 mg/m2 doxorubicin as a bolus infusion immediately followed by a 1 h 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel infusion to patients with metastatic breast cancer. A total of 119 weekly courses were delivered to seven patients. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in two patients at the first dose level, thus already defining the maximum tolerated dose. Pronounced non-hematologic toxicities were mild neuropathy (grade I: 39%) and stomatitis (grade I: 19%, grade II: 8%). No signs of cardiac toxicity were observed with this dose schedule. Three partial responses were achieved in this group of heavily pretreated patients. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, doxorubicin and Cremophor EL with this schedule were analyzed. Overall, the schedule was well tolerated and combined with its preliminary response rate justifies further evaluation in phase II studies.     

Phase I trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior chemotherapy and to recommend a dose for phase II studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy received docetaxel over 1 hour followed by cisplatin over 1 hour with hydration. Dose levels studied were (docetaxel/cisplatin) 50/75, 75/75, 75/100, and 100/75 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. Colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support was not used. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and cisplatin were studied in the first cycle of therapy. Most patients (79%) had metastatic disease or intrathoracic recurrence after prior radiation and/or surgery. RESULTS: Of 24 patients entered, all were assessable for toxicity and 18 for response. The MTD schedules were docetaxel 75 mg/m2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] in five of six patients), and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (DLTs in two of two patients, including one fatal toxicity). Limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and nonhematologic, principally diarrhea and renal. Two patients had neutropenic enterocolitis. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were consistent with results from single-agent studies, which suggests no major pharmacokinetic interaction. Neutropenia was related to docetaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). An alternative schedule was investigated, with cisplatin being administered over 3 hours commencing 3 hours after docetaxel, but toxicity did not appear to be less. Independently reviewed responses occurred in eight of 18 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22% to 69%), most following 75 mg/m2 of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour is recommended for phase II studies. The responses seen in this phase I study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated advanced NSCLC.