Ergonomics International News and Information—Winter 1992

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of load knowledge on lifting technique. Ten men lifted a box containing either no weight or weights of 150, 250 or 300 N with and without knowledge of what was inside the box. The kinetics and kinematics of the HA were analysed using a force plate, an optoelectronic motion analysis system, and a rigid body link model. At ON lifting, the unknown load resulted in a jerk–like motion and a significantly increased peak L5–S1 flexion–extension moment. At 150N there was also a significant increase in the speed of trunk extension with unknown weights, but the L5–S1 moment remained unchanged. At higher load levels there were only minor differences between lifting techniques when knowing and not knowing the load. We conclude that lifts are approached assuming a certain weight, and that when the assumption is wrong and the load lighter than anticipated lifting is performed with a ‘jerking’ motion, creating unnecessary loads on the lower back.     

The Ergonomics Society – The Society Lectures 2003

Spinal rotation, though being a very common motion of the body, is poorly understood. Furthermore, this motion and the extent of its development is unique to the human. Beyond the extent of its need in common activities, spinal rotation is a destabilizating motion for an inherently unstable structure. Spinal rotation has been argued to be an essential feature for an efficient bipedal gait. Also, it provides leverage to the upper extremities in delivering a forceful impact. An artificial restriction/elimination of spinal rotation resulted in significantly shorter stride length, slower walking velocity, and higher energy consumption in walking (p?<?0.05). Spinal rotation also decreases the amount of force the spinal muscles can generate (to 25% of spinal extension). However, its extensive employment in industrial activities has been associated with 60.4% of back injuries. It is further stated that the amount of scientific information currently available is inadequate to biomechanically model the spinal response in a working environment. For example, when the spine is pre-rotated, a further rotation in the direction of pre-rotation decreases the force production significantly (p?<?0.01) and increases the EMG activity significantly (p?<?0.01) but the pattern changes with effort in the opposite direction. This and other properties (described in the paper) render biomechanical models inadequate. Muscle activation pattern and neuromotor behaviour of spinal muscles in flexion/extension and rotation of the spine are significantly different from each other (p?<?0.01). The localized fatigue in different spinal muscles in the same contraction is significantly different and has been called differential fatigue. Finally, the trunk rotation, being pivotal for bipedal locomotion has brought many back problems to the human race.