Comparative study of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay, polymerase chain reaction, serology, and shell vial assay in the early diagnosis and monitoring of CMV infection after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, which is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients, remains of great importance. This prospective study was performed in kidney transplant recipients to determine the diagnostic value of the CMV antigenemia assay in comparison with polymerase chain reaction (PCR), serology, and shell vial assay. METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive renal transplant recipients were enrolled in this study and monitored by both antigenemia assay and serology. The initial 34 of the 75 patients were subjected to PCR and shell vial assay. RESULTS: Antigenemia, PCR, and shell vial assay became positive before the onset of CMV-related symptoms in 31/34 (89%), 13/16 (81%), and 2/16 (13%), respectively. None of the 34 patients who had symptomatic CMV disease showed a significant increase in IgG or IgM before the onset of symptoms. Antigenemia and PCR assays turned positive, 7 and 11 days (median), respectively, before the onset of clinical symptoms. Serology and shell vial assay became positive 21 and 25 days (median), respectively, after the onset of CMV-related clinical symptoms. To examine the clinical value of these assays, "good correlation" was defined based on the correlation between the clinical course and the results of the assays. Good correlation with the antigenemia assay was observed in 33 (96%) out of 34 renal transplant recipients who recovered from their CMV disease after ganciclovir therapy. Only one of 16 (7%) patients showed good correlation by shell vial assay, whereas PCR and serology did not show a good correlation. Consequently, antigenemia was considered the best way to monitor CMV infections after kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Only the CMV antigenemia assay can be successfully employed after renal transplantation for the early diagnosis and extensive monitoring of active CMV infection.     

A randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Posttransplantation cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. We performed a randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in a group of renal allograft recipients considered at high risk for CMV disease due to the use of OKT3 induction therapy. METHODS: A total of 101 recipients of cadaveric (83) and zero haplotype-matched live donor (18) kidney transplants were entered into the trial. A total of 22 D-R- patients received no prophylaxis. Twenty-seven D+R-, 29 D+R+, and 23 D-R+ patients were randomized to receive 3 months of either oral acyclovir (800 mg q.i.d.) or oral ganciclovir (1000 mg t.i.d.). Doses were adjusted according to the level of renal function. The D+R- patients were also given CMV immune globulin biweekly for 16 weeks. Surveillance blood cultures were obtained at transplantation, at months 1, 2, 3, and 6, and when clinically indicated. The primary study end points were time to CMV infection and disease the first 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS: The mean follow up was 14.4 months. Both agents were well tolerated, and no drug interruptions for toxicity occurred. CMV was isolated in 14 of 39 (35.9%) acyclovir-treated and 1 of 40 (2.5%) ganciclovir-treated recipients by 6 months (P=0.0001). Symptomatic CMV disease occurred in 9 of 14 (64%) of the acyclovir patients, two with tissue-invasive disease. Infection rates for acyclovir vs. ganciclovir, respectively, stratified by CMV serology were: D+R-, 54 vs. 0%, P=0.0008; D+R+, 43 vs. 6.6%, P=0.01; D-R+, 8.3 vs. 0%, P=NS. No patient developed CMV infection while taking oral ganciclovir, however three delayed infections occurred 2-7 months after finishing therapy. Each patient had been previously treated for acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Oral acyclovir provides effective CMV prophylaxis only for recipients of seronegative donor kidneys. Oral ganciclovir is a superior agent providing effective CMV prophylaxis for recipients of seropositive donor kidneys. Recipients who are treated for acute rejection are at risk for delayed CMV infection during the first posttransplantation year.     

Self-inflicted intramyocardial injury with a sewing needle: a rare cause of pneumothorax

Ganciclovir susceptibilities and UL97 sequences were analyzed in 20 cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolates recovered from 15 bone marrow transplant recipients with active CMV infection after prophylaxis with acyclovir (group I; 12 isolates) or after acyclovir prophylaxis followed by ganciclovir therapy (group II; 8 isolates). All group I isolates were susceptible to ganciclovir. Five group II isolates were susceptible to ganciclovir, and 3 isolates (all from the same person) were resistant to ganciclovir (IC50 > 12 microM). Ganciclovir resistance UL97 mutations were found in 4 group II isolates, including a ganciclovir-susceptible isolate obtained from 1 patient after 41 days of therapy with ganciclovir and 3 ganciclovir-resistant isolates obtained from another patient after 73, 116, and 132 days of treatment with ganciclovir. Ganciclovir-resistant CMV isolates may emerge rapidly in bone marrow transplant recipients who are treated with ganciclovir after receiving prophylaxis with acyclovir.     

Impact of high-dose oral acyclovir prophylaxis on cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in CMV high-risk renal transplant recipients

Recent studies showed contradictory results concerning the efficacy of oral acyclovir in the prevention or amelioration of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after renal transplantation (TX). This study evaluated the incidence and severity of CMV disease within the first year after TX in high-risk renal transplant recipients (CMV-seropositive donor, seronegative recipient) treated prophylactically with oral acyclovir (800 to 3200 mg/day) over a period of 12 wk (ACY, N = 22), compared with high-risk patients randomly assigned as controls (CO, N = 10). Follow-up for CMV infection included serological determination of CMV-specific immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M antibodies, antigen detection in peripheral blood leukocytes (PP 65), shell vial culture (blood), and virus isolation/early antigen detection (urine). Severity of CMV disease was quantified by a scoring system for CMV-related symptoms. Nine patients (40.1%) in the acyclovir group and four patients (40%) in the control group developed CMV disease. Neither severity (ACY, 11.4 versus CO; 12.5 points score), nor duration of disease (ACY, 21 days; CO, 22 days), nor transplant function at the end of the observation period differed significantly. The onst of CMV disease was not delayed significantly in acyclovir-treated patients compared with controls (ACY, 47 +/- 34 days versus CO, 27 +/- 14 days after TX, not significant). Our results show no beneficial effect of oral acyclovir prophylaxis in CMV high-risk renal transplant recipients.     

Prophylactic oral ganciclovir compared with deferred therapy for control of cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Treatment with prophylactic oral acyclovir, intravenous ganciclovir, or immunoglobulins to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in renal transplantation is associated with variable efficacy and significant expense. We studied control of CMV in renal transplant recipients using either prophylactic oral ganciclovir or deferred therapy with intensive monitoring with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. METHODS: Forty-two recipients were followed for 6 months after transplantation. Ganciclovir (1000 mg p.o. t.i.d.; n=19) or acyclovir (200 mg p.o. b.i.d.; n=23) was begun at transplantation and continued for 12 weeks. PCR for CMV was performed on buffy-coat specimens every week for 15 weeks and at months 5 and 6. RESULTS: No patients in the ganciclovir group, compared with 14 of 23 patients (61%) in the deferred-therapy group (P<0.0001), developed CMV disease during the first 12 weeks. In the ganciclovir group, 4 of 19 patients (21%) subsequently experienced 5 episodes, whereas 14 patients in the deferred-therapy group experienced 18 episodes (P=0.013 for subjects and P=0.026 for episodes). The time to disease was also delayed in the ganciclovir group compared with the deferred-therapy group (133+/-17 days vs. 51+/-7 days; P<0.0001). Oral ganciclovir also prevented CMV viremia during prophylaxis (2/19 patients [11%] vs. 23/23 patients [100%]). Time to CMV viremia was delayed in the ganciclovir group; however, 13/19 patients (68%) ultimately showed PCR evidence for CMV viremia (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: An initial 12-week course of oral ganciclovir prevents CMV disease and infection in renal transplant recipients during prophylaxis, and the benefits persist after discontinuation.     

Rapid detection cytomegalovirus pneumonia in recipients of bone marrow transplant: evaluation and comparison of five survey methods for bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

To detect cytomegalovirus-associated interstitial pneumonia (CMV-IP) in recipients of BMT in its earliest stage, five CMV methods were assessed for their usefulness using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid as the test specimen. Of the 43 cases enrolled in the study, PCR was positive in 12 cases, shell vial in eight, culture in eight and cytology in three. There were no positive cases in in situ hybridization. Based on this result, the 43 cases were classified into four groups: Group 1, three cases: positive in PCR, shell vial and cytology; Group 2, five cases: positive in PCR and shell vial; Group 3, four cases: positive only in PCR; and Group 4, 31 cases: negative in all CMV tests. Cases in Group 1 were judged as having the highest risk of overt CMV-IP. They were successfully treated with a combination of ganciclovir and immunoglobulin. Group 2 was diagnosed as having active CMV infection and ganciclovir monotherapy was effective for these patients. Groups 3 and 4 were not given anti-CMV therapy, but they were free from CMV-related manifestations throughout the study. The sensitivity and specificity of each survey method for the detection of Groups 1 and 2 were 1.0 and 0.89 in PCR, 1.0 and 1.0 in shell vial, 0.88 and 1.0 in culture, and 0.38 and 1.0 in cytology. Similarly, the positive and negative predictive values were 0.67 and 1.0 in PCR, 1.0 and 1.0 in shell vial, 1.0 and 0.97 in culture, and 1.0 and 0.88 in cytology. Thus, CMV survey on bronchoalveolar fluid was thought to be useful in detecting post BMT CMV-IP in its earliest stage.     

Comparison of PCR and pp65 antigenemia assay with quantitative shell vial culture for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood leukocytes from solid-organ transplant recipients

This study compared PCR and an assay for cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigenemia (CMV-vue; INCSTAR Corp.) with a quantitative shell vial culture (QSVC) technique for the detection of CMV in serial blood specimens from 46 solid-organ transplant recipients. In a comparison based on 535 specimens tested by PCR and QSVC, CMV was detected by PCR in 41 and by QSVC in 37 of 43 recipients at risk of CMV infection. The mean number of days after transplantation of initial detection of CMV was 29.9 for PCR and 34.0 for QSVC (P = 0.01). The antigenemia assay was performed on 395 specimens, including 304 of those also tested by PCR. In these specimens, CMV was detected by the antigenemia assay, QSVC, and PCR in 30, 32, and 35 (respectively) of 38 patients at risk, with no statistically significant difference in the time to detection. Each of the assays detected CMV in similar proportions of patients with and without clinically significant CMV infection. PCR stayed positive longer after transplantation than the other assays but frequently returned to negative when more than 6 months had elapsed after transplantation. The antigenemia assay and PCR stayed positive longer after institution of antiviral therapy than QSVC. PCR can provide highly sensitive detection of CMV viremia, but a PCR assay for CMV is not yet available in kit form. The pp65 antigenemia assay and shell vial culture are quantifiable and comparable in sensitivity. Either is recommended for rapid detection of CMV in blood specimens from solid-organ transplant recipients.     

Evaluation of Murex CMV DNA hybrid capture assay for detection and quantitation of cytomegalovirus infection in patients following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Murex hybrid capture DNA assay (HCS) is a solution hybridization antibody capture assay for detection and quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in leukocytes. To determine whether CMV HCS is sensitive enough to initiate and monitor antiviral therapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), 51 consecutive SCT recipients were prospectively screened for the appearance of CMV infection by HCS, PCR, and culture assays from blood samples. Preemptive antiviral therapy was initiated after the second positive PCR result in all patients, as previously reported, and HCS was not considered for clinical decision making. A total of 417 samples were analyzed. Of these, 21 samples were found to be positive by PCR and HCS, 88 samples were PCR positive but HCS negative, and 308 were negative by both assays. Concordance of results between PCR and HCS and between HCS and blood culture was observed in 78.9 and 95.9% of the samples assayed, respectively. PCR was found to be more sensitive than HCS, and HCS was more sensitive than the blood culture assay (P < 0.0001). Four patients with symptomatic CMV infection were PCR positive prior to the onset of CMV-related symptoms, whereas HCS detected CMV DNA in three patients prior to and one at onset of CMV disease. The numbers of genomes per milliliter of blood were higher in patients with symptomatic CMV infection than in those with asymptomatic CMV infection (P = 0.06). None of the HCS-negative patients developed CMV disease. Thus, all patients with CMV disease were correctly identified by HCS; however, the lower sensitivity limit of the HCS assay may still be insufficient to allow diagnosis of CMV infection early enough to prevent CMV disease in patients following allogeneic SCT.     

Lack of clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cultures for cytomegalovirus in HIV infection

This study assessed the presence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in three subpopulations of HIV-infected patients and correlated its presence with clinical status during 3 mo of follow-up. Nineteen asymptomatic volunteers, six patients with CMV retinitis, and 46 patients with acute pulmonary symptoms underwent BAL and were assessed for CMV by cytopathology, conventional shell vial cultures, and antigen detection. Transbronchial biopsies were also obtained when possible and evaluated for histopathologic changes of CMV. All patients were followed for approximately 3 mo. Cytomegalovirus was detected in BAL in nine of 19 (47%) asymptomatic volunteers, in all six patients with CMV retinitis, and in 33 of 46 (72%) patients with pulmonary symptoms. Only one symptomatic patient with a positive CMV BAL culture developed clinically significant CMV pulmonary disease; this patient developed disseminated CMV and died. The only other death occurred in a patient with CMV retinitis who developed staphylococcal bacteremia. None of the asymptomatic volunteers or patients with CMV retinitis developed evidence of CMV pneumonia or any other organ disease with CMV. Cytomegalovirus is frequently detected in BAL from HIV-infected patients regardless of their pulmonary symptoms and its presence does not clinically predict significant pulmonary morbidity or mortality in 3 mo of follow-up.     

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction to predict occurrence of symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection and assess response to ganciclovir therapy in renal transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA levels were measured by quantitative-competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in weekly leukocyte samples from 50 renal transplant recipients, including 23 with symptomatic and 27 with asymptomatic CMV infection. Peak and week 4 CMV DNA levels were higher in symptomatic subjects (P = .07 and .02, respectively). In a logistic regression model, the logarithm of the week 4 level independently predicted symptomatic infection (odds ratio, 1.78 for a 1 log10 increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.78; P = .01). All subjects whose week 4 level exceeded 1000 copies/100,000 leukocytes developed symptoms. In subjects with adequate samples for analysis, CMV levels declined exponentially with ganciclovir treatment, with an average half-life of 3.3 days. Levels exceeding 10,000 copies were associated with prolonged time to clearing of CMV DNA. Potential clinical applications of quantitative CMV PCR include predicting occurrence of symptomatic first episodes after transplantation and individualizing duration of antiviral therapy.     

Strategies for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after marrow transplantation

The purposes of this review are to examine the epidemiology of disease due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) in recipients of autologous and allogeneic marrow transplants and to compare different antiviral regimens used for the prevention of such disease in recipients of allogeneic marrow transplants, with an emphasis on ganciclovir. In seven studies, ganciclovir reduced the incidence of CMV infection and disease after allogeneic marrow transplantation. In one study mortality after transplantation was reduced because of a decreased rate of CMV-related death among ganciclovir-treated patients. Ganciclovir was effective when given to all CMV-seropositive patients (prophylaxis) or to patients who were considered at high risk for CMV disease on the basis of a positive surveillance culture (early treatment). The effectiveness of ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV infection and disease is limited by drug-induced neutropenia. Experience with other antiviral agents, such as foscarnet, has been limited. Initial studies of the adoptive transfer of CMV-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells have been conducted. In short, ganciclovir is currently effective for the prevention of CMV disease in allogeneic marrow transplant recipients, but its usefulness is limited by neutropenia. Future studies must be aimed at confining the toxicity of ganciclovir to patients at the highest risk for CMV disease.     

Unesterified cholesterol content of human sperm regulates the response of the acrosome to the agonist, progesterone

A prospective virologic follow-up of solid organ transplant patients was designed to determine the usefulness of antigenemia and viremia as virologic markers for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, and also for monitoring CMV disease and therapy control. A total of 629 blood samples from 127 patients (60 liver, 47 kidney, and 20 heart transplant recipients) were studied by tube and shell vial cultures, and by antigenemia assay. This later was carried out by an indirect immunofluorescent assay method for formalin-fixed cytospin slides containing 2 x 10(5) leukocytes, using a monoclonal antibody directed against the CMV pp65 antigen. CMV was detected by at least one of the three methods in 238 specimens (37.8%) from a total of 63 patients. The antigenemia assay was positive in 215 (90.3% of positive samples). A total of 94 samples were detected only by this marker, which occurred either in samples with low positive counts (70.2% with antigenemia counts < 10 positive cells/10(5) leukocytes) or in specimens from treated patients. There were 30 episodes of CMV disease in 23 patients. Antigenemia was positive in all these episodes, 27 of them with counts > 20 positive cells/10(5) leukocytes. With this cut-off, positive and negative predictive values for symptomatic CMV infection were 100% and 97.2%, respectively. The antigenemia assay is a rapid, sensitive, specific, and early marker of CMV infection in transplantees. Cultures became negative with antiviral therapy while remaining antigenemia detectable. There was an association between highest quantitative antigenemia test results and clinical symptoms in our patients. In its quantitative version, the assay is useful to detect symptomatic infection and appears to be a helpful tool in managing patients at risk and in guiding antiviral therapy.     

Clinical evaluation in organ transplant patients of a polymerase chain reaction test for CMV DNA applied on white blood cells and serum

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for CMV DNA was evaluated for clinical usefulness. Leukocytes and serum were sampled from 36 patients who had recently undergone organ transplantation. Clinical symptoms, virus culture, and IgG and IgM antibodies were used to identify, in retrospect, patients with CMV disease certified beyond all doubt, with probable disease, with asymptomatic infection, or without infection. PCR tests for CMV DNA in leukocytes (BC-PCR) and serum (SE-PCR) were then evaluated. BC-PCR was positive in all patients with certified CMV disease but also in 31% of the samples from patients without infection. SE-PCR was positive in 11/13 patients with certified disease and was concordant with CMV culture in 192/231 tests. Of the 39 discordant cases, 27 had a positive SE-PCR with a negative culture. The effect of ganciclovir treatment could not be predicted by any test. In conclusion, a negative BC-PCR is strong evidence against CMV disease and a positive SE-PCR strongly suggests CMV disease, but the opposite results are of little clinical help.     

Psychiatric diseases presenting as infectious diseases

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is an important cause of organ transplant-related morbidity and mortality. During the last 5 years at our institution, prophylactic ganciclovir and hyperimmune globulin have been routinely administered to lung transplant recipients whenever the donor or the recipient was CMV antibody-positive. We sought to assess the efficacy of prophylaxis on viremia, CMV disease, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 61 consecutive lung transplants performed between recipients between January 1993 and August 1995 was performed. Fifty-six patients who survived at least 1 month were analyzed. Patients were considered at risk for CMV disease whenever pretransplant donor or recipient serology was positive. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 39 patients at risk (36%) had viremia while on prophylaxis. The rate of CMV disease was 13% during the first 6 months following transplantation. A donor whose CMV serology was positive appeared to increase the risk of BOS in a Cox regression model (relative risk=2.4; 95% confidence interval=0.86-6.74; p=0.0957). Neither age, CMV infection (viremia or a positive specimen from BAL), recipient's serology at the time of transplantation, or CMV disease was associated with BOS. None of these variables was associated with mortality on Cox regression analysis or univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of combination ganciclovir and hyperimmune globulin prophylactic therapy to lung transplant recipients at risk for CMV infection and disease is associated with a relatively low incidence of disease, which appears only after prophylaxis treatment with ganciclovir is completed. Ganciclovir prophylaxis does not prevent CMV viremia; however, viremia while on prophylaxis is not predictive of disease.     

Failure of ganciclovir prophylaxis to prevent allograft reinfection following orthotopic liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B infection

The effect of ganciclovir prophylaxis on reinfection of hepatic allografts by hepatitis B virus (HBV) was studied in 26 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for decompensated cirrhosis due to HBV. Patients were randomized to receive either ganciclovir (6 mg/kg/day intravenously for a total of 100 days) or acyclovir (10 mg/kg every 8 hours intravenously until discharged and then 800 mg orally every 6 hours) for a total of 100 days after OLT as part of a study of prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection. All patients received hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG), 10,000 units intravenously, during the anhepatic phase, daily for the first 7 days, after OLT, and then every 4 weeks for 6 months, Seven of 12 (58%) patients in the ganciclovir group developed recurrent HBV, compared with 6/14 (46%) of the acyclovir group (nonsignificant). No significant difference was observed in time to recurrent HBV in the ganciclovir group (mean 13.2 months) compared to the acyclovir group (mean 11 months). Our results suggest that ganciclovir administered prophylactically for 100 days after OLT does not prevent or delay graft reinfection by HBV.     

Utility of major leukocyte subpopulations for monitoring secondary cytomegalovirus infections in renal-allograft recipients by PCR

The feasibility of the major peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) subsets for use in qualitative and quantitative PCR to monitor secondary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and ganciclovir therapy was assessed with 188 blood samples derived from 40 CMV immunoglobulin G-positive renal-allograft recipients. In pp65 antigen-positive patients all leukocyte fractions, but only 79.5% of plasma preparations, were PCR positive. In pp65 antigen-negative samples from patients after antiviral treatment only 7.3% of polymorphonuclear cell (PMNL) samples, but 81.8% of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and 10.9% of plasma samples remained PCR positive. Similarly, in patients with latent infections only 5.0% of PMNL, but 51.7% of PBMC preparations, and 8.0% of plasma samples were PCR positive. Regarding patients with active CMV infection, CMV DNA copy numbers in PMNL correlated significantly with pp65 antigen-positive cell counts before and after onset of ganciclovir therapy. Significant differences in CMV DNA copy numbers in PMNL and plasma were observed (i) between patients with symptomatic infection and those with asymptomatic infection and (ii) between patients with active infection and those with latent infection. In contrast, PBMC harbored equally low CMV DNA levels both in patients with active infection and those with latent infections, and no decline of CMV DNA load in PBMC was observed during antiviral treatment. We conclude that detection of CMV DNA in PMNL, not in PBMC, is associated with active infections and is more sensitive than detection of CMV DNA in plasma. Negative PCR results for PMNL after antiviral therapy indicate recovery, and fewer unwanted positive results occur compared to PBMC and plasma. Therefore, purified PMNL should be preferred for analysis by qualitative CMV PCR to avoid unwanted positive results. The CMV DNA load in PBMC compared with that in PMNL is negligible during active infection, so mixed PBL are sufficient for use in quantitative PCR.     

Randomized comparison of ganciclovir plus intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) with IVIG alone for prevention of primary cytomegalovirus disease in children receiving liver transplants

A randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted to determine the benefit of ganciclovir (5 mg/[kg x d]) for 30 days in addition to intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) for 16 weeks for prevention of primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in children receiving liver transplants. Patients were monitored for 6 months after transplantation. The two groups of patients (recipients of 29 ganciclovir plus IVIG and 27 recipients of IVIG alone) were similar in terms of age, sex, and underlying disease. The incidence of CMV disease among the ganciclovir plus IVIG recipients and the IVIG alone recipients was 17% and 26%, respectively, and the time to disease in these recipients was 46 days and 32 days, respectively. There was no difference between groups in terms of survival; episodes of rejection, bacteremia, or fungemia; use of immunosuppressive agents; and incidence of leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. These results suggest that a 4-week course of ganciclovir with IVIG is not more effective than IVIG alone for prevention of primary CMV disease. Since short-term prophylaxis with ganciclovir may delay the onset of CMV disease, further studies with a longer course of ganciclovir prophylaxis are warranted.     

Comparison of monoclonal antibodies for immunostaining in the cytomegalovirus shell vial assay on 4,388 specimens

The shell vial assay is a sensitive, rapid test for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in a variety of specimens. The sensitivity of this assay is dependent on a number of factors including the antibodies used for immunostaining. Monoclonal antibodies to the CMV major immediate-early antigen (p72) from Chemicon (MAB810) and Dupont (NEA-9221) were assessed side by side in duplicate vials on 4,388 specimens from a patient population consisting of > 90% organ transplant recipients. A total of 240 specimens (5.5%) were CMV positive in either one or both vials. Positivity rates were variable across different specimen types but highest (12.9%) in urine specimens. Of the positive specimens, 175 (72.9%) tested positive in both vials, 43 (17.9%) tested positive in the Chemicon-stained vial only, and 22 (9.2%) tested positive in the Dupont-stained vial only (P < 0.01, McNemar's chi-square test). This gave an overall positivity rate of 5.0% for Chemicon antibodies and 4.5% for Dupont. There was no difference in the fluorescent focus counts produced by the two antibody sets. It is concluded that use of the Chemicon antibodies provides increased sensitivity of detection of CMV in the shell vial assay above that afforded by the Dupont antibody.     

Clinical utility of cytomegalovirus urine cultures for ophthalmic care in patients with HIV

BACKGROUND: The utility of cytomegalovirus (CMV) urine cultures was checked in patients with HIV (a) to identify those at risk for CMV retinitis and (b) to guide clinical decisions on treatment and prophylaxis of CMV retinitis. METHODS: HIV infected patients were tested for CMVuria by shell vial cell cultures. The prevalence of CMVuria was related to CD4 count, HIV risk group, and time before and after diagnosis of CMV retinitis. RESULTS: A total of 639 shell vial cell cultures were obtained from 266 HIV infected ophthalmic patients. Only 4% of all patients with a CD4 count > 400 x 10(6)/l shed CMV in their urine compared with 42% with a CD4 count < or = 50 x 10(6)/l. Twenty three of 25 patients with CMV retinitis had a CD4 count < or = 50 x 10(6)/l. Among 130 patients with a CD4 count < or = 50 x 10(6)/l (a) those who were CMVuric had a nearly sevenfold risk (p < 0.0001) of developing CMV retinitis (35%) compared with those who did not shed CMV in their urine (5%), and (b) CMVuria and CMV retinitis were more frequent in homosexuals (58%/25%) than in intravenous drug users (23%/15%). More than 1 year before diagnosis of CMV retinitis 18% of patients were CMVuric compared with 83% of patients who were CMV culture positive in the last 3 months. CMVuria under virustatic maintenance therapy is associated with worsening of retinitis in two thirds of cases. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmic screening of patients with HIV should include those with a CD4 count < or = 50 x 10(6)/l and focus on the subgroup with additional CMVuria. Screening of other patients can be dropped without undue risk in order to spare AIDS patients unnecessary hospital visits. CMVuria as a single finding, however, does not justify antiviral prophylaxis of CMV retinitis.     

Effect of oral acyclovir or ganciclovir therapy after preemptive intravenous ganciclovir therapy to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus seropositive renal and liver transplant recipients receiving antilymphocyte antibody therapy

BACKGROUND: Organ transplant recipients who are seropositive for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and who are treated with antilymphocyte antibody (ALA) therapy have a high rate of symptomatic CMV disease. The intravenous administration of ganciclovir therapy once daily during ALA therapy decreased the incidence from 24% to 10% in patients receiving ALA as an induction therapy and from 64% to 22% in those treated for rejection. The present study was undertaken to determine whether a more intensive and sustained antiviral regimen could be more effective. METHODS: From April 1995 to December 1997, all CMV seropositive renal and liver transplant recipients who received ALA therapy were treated with intravenously administered ganciclovir (5 mg/kg/day with dose adjusted for renal dysfunction) for the length of ALA therapy and then with orally administered acyclovir (400 mg three times/day) or ganciclovir (1 gm twice/day) for 3 to 4 months. The incidence of CMV viremia and of CMV disease was determined during the 6 months after completion of ALA therapy. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (35 renal and 6 liver transplant recipients) were studied. CMV disease occurred in 2 patients (4.9%), both of whom were treated for rejection; it occurred in 1 of 21 patients (4.8%) treated with orally administered acyclovir, and in 1 of 20 patients (5%) treated with orally administered ganciclovir. The only patient who developed CMV disease in the ganciclovir group had received only 26 days of oral antiviral therapy. No CMV disease was documented in the group of patients receiving ALA therapy as induction therapy. CMV viremia occurred in three patients in the acyclovir group (14.3%) and in one patient in the ganciclovir group (5%). Among renal transplant recipients only, 1 of 35 patients developed CMV disease (2.9%) and no case of CMV disease was documented in patients treated with orally administered ganciclovir. All six patients receiving two courses of ALA therapy each were free of CMV disease. Toxicity of the regimen was minimal, and antiviral resistance did not develop. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive antiviral therapy with intravenously administered ganciclovir during ALA therapy and then orally administered ganciclovir for 3 to 4 months provides virtually complete protection against the excessive rate of CMV disease that occurs in CMV seropositive allograft recipients receiving ALA therapy.