Erythrocyte Na/K ATPase activity and diabetes: relationship with C-peptide level

The purpose of this study is to clarify the volume effect of epidural saline injection 20 min after spinal anesthesia. Thirty patients undergoing combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups: a control group (n = 15) and a saline group (n = 15). In the control group, 2% lidocaine 3 ml with 0.4% tetracaine was injected into the subarachnoid space from L 4-5 interspace using Durasafe (Becton Dickinson, USA) and saline was not injected into the epidural space. In the saline group, saline 10 ml was injected through an epidural catheter 20 min after spinal anesthesia. The levels of analgesia 20 min after spinal anesthesia were not significantly different between the groups. However, the levels of analgesia 3, 5, 10, 40 and 100 min after epidural saline injection in the saline group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The highest analgesic level was obtained 10 min after epidural saline injection and reached to T 4.3 +/- 1.1. In conclusion, epidural saline injection increases the analgesic level 20 min after spinal anesthesia because of the volume effect.     

Autonomic hyperreflexia in a pregnant paraplegic patient. Case report

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pregnant patients with spinal cord injuries are predisposed to autonomic hyperreflexia, which if unrecognized or untreated can lead to death. Hypertension occurring in laboring patients at risk for autonomic hyperreflexia must be managed aggressively. METHODS: Epidural anesthesia can safely control autonomic hyperreflexia during labor and delivery, but because spinal cord impaired patients lack sensory and motor function below the level of injury, it is difficult to determine the dermatomal spread of epidural anesthesia by the usual methods. This difficulty is highlighted by the following case, reporting an epidural that failed during labor, with the subsequent development of autonomic hyperreflexia. RESULTS: Previously, autonomic hyperreflexia occurring in pregnant patients (undergoing surgical procedures) was treated with intravenous antihypertensive agents. During labor, however, titrating these agents to coincide with uterine contractions is difficult. In this case, epidural anesthesia was repeated and the autonomic hyperreflexia resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Autonomic hyperreflexia can develop in unanesthetized laboring paraplegic patients (failed epidural) but it can be successfully managed with adequate epidural anesthesia.     

Treatment of human pulmonary paragonimiasis with triclabendazole: clinical tolerance and drug efficacy

We report the anesthetic management of a patient with aortitis syndrome using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. A 28-year-old gravida with aortitis syndrome accompanied by faints was scheduled for an urgent cesarean section. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was thought to be better for this case in order to monitor the cerebral circulation by her consciousness level and to reduce the hemodynamic change during surgery as compared to spinal or epidural anesthesia alone. After inserting an epidural catheter at the Th 12/L 1 interspace, spinal anesthesia was performed with 1.5 ml of 0.3% dibucaine at the L 4/L 5 interspace. The level of analgesia was under L 1 with the pinprick method 10 min after the spinal anesthesia. Next, 5 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine was injected through the epidural catheter. The level of analgesia reached to Th 6 without major hemodynamic changes. A healthy 2740 g infant was delivered and she had an uneventful recovery. We conclude that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia is useful in a patient with aortitis syndrome undergoing an urgent cesarean section in order to monitor the cerebral circulation by the consciousness level and to reduce the hemodynamic change.     

Value of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in the management of peroperative analgesia in prosthetic surgery of the lower limb. Prospective study of 68 cases

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Efficient peri-operative analgesia is more comfortable, allows earlier mobilisation and better functional results for lower limb arthroplasties. We report our 60 cases prospective study of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia, and expose interests of this technique to control peri-operative pain. MATERIALS: From 1994 to 1995, 60 patients ASA class 1 were operated: 45 total hip replacement (THR), 15 total knee replacement (TKR). The average age was sixty five years (range thirty nine to eighty five years). Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was performed in every case. METHODS: In lateral decubitus position, a translucent 25 Gauge needle was introduced in L2-L3 interspace. In a first time spinal anesthesia was made with 20 mg Bupivacaine. In a second time, a lumbar epidural catheter was inserted. All patients received an epidural post-operative analgesia with 4 mg Morphine once a day during two days and intravenous Paracetamol. Visual analogue scale (0 to 10) (VAS) were recorded after the third post operative hour and every twelve hours. During this period satisfaction mark was also recorded (1 to 3). RESULTS: We didn't observe any case of respiratory depression or infection with the epidural catheter. We observed 10 cases of pruritus (one needed to stop protocol) and 18 urinary retentions. Six uretral catheters were necessary; we had one case of pyelonephritis (escherichia coli). The first micturition was obtained 13.5 hours after the end of surgery. For the fifty nine remaining patients, visual analogue scale was always inferior or equal to 2/10 and the satisfaction mark to 1/3. DISCUSSION: Different techniques allow peri-operative analgesia, but a few are efficient during the first two days. Plexus nerve blocks are simple and reliable but post-operative anesthesia is short (inferior to 15 hours). Intravenous morphine controlled by patients themselves with programmed display needs expensive and sophisticated material. The principal risk is respiratory depression. Epidural morphine has a lower respiratory depression risk, but needs a heavier technique. The principal problems is higher incidence of urinary side effects. Epidural anesthesia might tend to show a greater efficacity with the best visual analogue scale and satisfaction mark. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for the management of peri-operative pain provide an excellent pain control with a daily morphine injection. For lower limb arthroplasties, visual analogue scale is always inferior or equal to 2 and satisfaction mark equal to 1.     

A case of systemic lupus erythematosus associated with spinal epidural hematoma

A 47 year-old Japanese female who showed transverse myelopathy (TM) due to spinal epidural hematoma diagnosed by MRI in the course of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was reported. She was admitted to Keio University Hospital due to paraplegia, anesthesia of lower extremity, urinary disturbance. Neurological examination revealed transverse disturbance of Th 10. Lumbar spinal cord MRI showed irregular mass that located at epidural region of 9th-11th thoracic vertebrae. When the laminectomy of 9th-11th thoracic vertebrae was performed, hematoma (4.5 cm x 1.5 cm in size) was confirmed and removed completely. Post operative condition was stable and symptoms had been improving gradually. It has been reported that TM associated with SLE was closely related to myelitis. In this case, epidural hematoma was a major cause of TM and MRI was very useful for her diagnosis and treatment. This is the rare case of SLE associated with spinal epidural hematoma and was thought as a important case to consider the cause of neurological complication of SLE.     

Spinal epidural abscess associated with epidural anesthesia: gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and its usefulness in diagnosis and treatment

A case of spinal epidural abscess following epidural anesthesia is described. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance images were essential in diagnosis of the abscess without frank pus formation, in defining the extension of the infection, and in assessing the therapeutic effect. The patient was successfully treated non-operatively before neurological symptoms developed and full recovery was achieved.     

Current local anesthetics in segmental nerve blocks

The evolution of central segmental blockades was studied in 133 patients by using epidural and spinal anesthesias. The efficiencies of 2% Ultracaine (Hoechst) and 2% Lidocaine (Egis) solutions used for epidural anesthesia and 5% Ultracaine (Hoechst) and 0.75% Bupivacaine (Astra) hyperbaric solutions were evaluated. Central segmental blockade induced by Ultracaine was found to be similar to Lidocaine and Bupivacaine in clinical parameters. At epidural blockade, the latent period was identical for the two agents and the duration of analgesia caused by Ultracaine was 20 minutes longer than that with Lidocaine, the consumption of the former being 20% less. At spinal anesthesia, there were no great differences in the depth and duration of conduction block, but with 5% Ultracaine, the analgesic zone was large (13.2 +/- 1.0 and 15.1 +/- 0.6 segments, p < 0.05). No differences were found in the magnitude of hemodynamic changes both with various anesthetics and different types of segmental blockades. The findings make it possible to regard Ultracaine as an drug that has some advantage over Lidocaine for prolonged epidural anesthesia and similar to the latter in pharmacological characteristics. Ultracaine may be regarded as alternative to Bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia.     

CSE vs. augmented epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Spinal and epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.5% "isobar" require augmentation

Incomplete anaesthesia is a major clinical problem both in single spinal and in single epidural anaesthesia. The clinical efficacy of epidural anaesthesia with augmentation (aEA) and combined epidural and spinal anesthesia (CSE) for cesarean section was investigated in a prospective randomized study on 45 patients. METHODS: Anaesthesia extending up to Th5 was aimed for. Depending on the patient's height, epidural anaesthesia was administered with a dose of 18-22 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and spinal anaesthesia with a dose of 11-15 mg 0.5% bupivacaine. Augmentation was carried out in all cases in epidural anaesthesia, initially with 7.5 ml 1% Lidocaine with epinephrine 1:400,000, raised by 1.5 ml per missing segment. The epidural reinjection in CSE was carried out as necessary with 9.5-15 ml 1% lidocaine with epinephrine, depending on the height and difference from the segment Th5. RESULTS: The extension of anaesthesia achieved in epidural anaesthesia after an initial dose of 101.8 mg bupivacaine and augmenting dose of 99 mg lidocaine reached the segment Th5. The primary spinal anaesthesia dose up to 15 mg corresponding to height led to a segmental extension to a maximum of Th3 under CSE. Augmentation was necessary in 13 patients; in 5 cases because of inadequate extent of anaesthesia and 8 cases because of pain resulting from premature reversion. The augmenting dose required was 13.9 ml. Readiness for operation was attained after 19.8 min (aEA) and after 10.5 min (CSE). No patient required analgesics before delivery. The additional analgesic requirement during operation was 63.6% (aEA) and 39.1% (CSE). Taking into account pain in the area of surgery, the requirement of analgesics was 50% (aEA) vs. 17.4% (CSE). Antiemetics were required in 18.2 (aEA) and in 65.2% (CSE). The systolic blood pressure fell by 17.7% (aEA) and in 30.3% (CSE). The minimum systolic pressure was observed after 13.4 min in aEA, and after 9.5 min in CSE. The APGAR score and the umbilical pH did not show any differences. General anaesthesia was not required in any case.     

Safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in parturients with chorioamnionitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in patients with chorioamnionitis was explored. METHODS: A retrospective study was made of the charts of 517 parturients who had received epidural anesthesia and 14 who had received spinal anesthesia before delivery and whose placentas had subsequently been found to be positive for chorioamnionitis. RESULTS: Of the 146 blood culture results that were reported, 13 were positive. Of these 13 blood cultures, 5 had been drawn within 6 hours after placement of the epidural block, and four of the five bacteremic patients did not receive antibiotics until after the regional anesthetic was administered. One quarter (11/45) of the patients who were febrile and three quarters (174/229) of those who had leukocytosis before their block received no antibiotics before the block was placed. After the epidural block was performed, the catheter was left in place for over 24 hours in 18% (46/260) of the women who spiked a fever and in 14% (18/130) of those who exhibited leukocytosis during that period. There was no report of an epidural or spinal abscess or of meningitis in any of the women in the study. CONCLUSION: Conduction anesthesia may be safe in parturients with chorioamnionitis without prior antibiotic therapy.     

Neurologic complications after placement of cerebrospinal fluid drainage catheters and needles in anesthetized patients: implications for regional anesthesia. Mayo Perioperative Outcomes Group

Subarachnoid or epidural needle placement in an anesthetized patient is controversial because general anesthesia and muscle relaxation may mask neural trauma. However, placement of a needle or catheter in the subarachnoid space for the purpose of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) drainage is frequently performed in anesthetized patients undergoing neurosurgery. The records from 530 consecutive transsphenoidal surgeries performed with lumbar CSF drainage were reviewed to determine the types of neurologic complications attributable to spinal drainage and their rates of occurrence. All patients were anesthetized during CSF drain placement. A 19-gauge malleable needle was placed in 473 (89%) patients. Subarachnoid catheters (20- or 16-gauge catheters placed via 18- or 14-gauge epidural needles, respectively) were placed in 17 (3%) patients. In 40 (8%) patients, the type of drain was unspecified. No new neurologic deficits attributable to spinal drain insertion were detected in the immediate postoperative period or within 1 yr of surgery. Thirteen patients developed postdural puncture headache (2.5%, exact 95% confidence interval 1.3%-4.2%); seven required epidural blood patch (1.3%, 0.5%-2.7%). The low incidence (0%, 0.0%-0.7%) of neurologic injury from spinal drain insertion in anesthetized patients from this study is similar to the incidence of neurologic complications historically reported for both CSF drain insertion and spinal anesthesia. Implications: The performance of regional anesthesia in an anesthetized patient is controversial due to the possibility of unrecognized nerve injury. We report no cases of nerve injury caused by the placement of cerebrospinal fluid drainage needles and catheters in 530 anesthetized patients undergoing neurosurgery.     

Anesthesia for funnel chest operation

The incidence of perioperative complication and days of hospital stay were studied in 56 patients with funnel chest operation under inhalational anesthesia (18 cases), intravenous anesthesia (23 cases) and epidural anesthesia (15 cases). Perioperative complication occurred most frequently in the inhalational group and was followed by intravenous and epidural group. Postoperative hospitalization on an average was 21.4 days in the inhalational group, 21.9 days in the intravenous group and 16.7 days in the epidural group. It is said that postoperative pain leads to splinting of the chest, which can cause atelectasis and/or pneumonia. Severe postoperative pulmonary complication was reduced in the epidural groups. As a result, hospitalization in the epidural group was shorter than in other groups. This study suggests that epidural anesthesia is more advantageous for funnel chest operation because epidural anesthesia has protective action against arrhythmia and postoperative pulmonary complication.     

Pharmacology of local anesthetics and clinical aspects of segmental blocking. II. Spinal anesthesia

Clinical picture of development of segmental blocking after subarachnoidal injection of hyperbaric solutions of 0.75% bupivacaine, 5% ultracaine, and isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine is studied. A total of 152 patients operated on the lower part of the body and the lower limbs were examined under conditions of single, prolonged subarachnoidal, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Ultracaine and bupivacaine in different concentrations with different barism provided anesthesia equivalent by the efficacy, depth, and dissemination of sensory block. Segmental blocking with 5% ultracaine was characterized by the shortest latent period (3.14 +/- 0.16 min, p < 0.05) but was no shorter (124.1 +/- 3.37 min) than operative analgesia with 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine (120.0 +/- 5.10 min). Isobaric bupivacaine provided the longest effective analgesia (215.0 +/- 45.0 min, p < 0.05). Microcatheter technique improved the safety and control of subarachnoidal anesthesia in comparison with a single injection, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia shortened the latent period of segmental blocking and ensured intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia at the expense of the epidural component.     

Changes in human evoked spinal potentials (ESP) by epidural lidocaine

Controversies exist on the sites of action of epidural anesthesia. Leading opinion says that it works on spinal nerve root. We examined ESP and tactile sensations in 4 patients during epidural anesthesia with lidocaine to determine the effects of the anesthesia on spinal cord. Prolongation of latency and decrease in amplitude of ESP appeared 10 min after injection of 1.5% lidocaine 4 ml, each parameter reaching maximum value of 115% and 60% of the control value 30 min afterwards, respectively. Then they started to recover slowly, reaching normal values 150 min later. Changes in ESP and tactile sensation were closely related. Decreases in amplitude to 90%, 80%, 60% of the control values were observed for hypesthesia, analgesia, and anesthesia, respectively. We conclude that the spinal cord also is an important site of action of epidural anesthesia.     

Spinal epidural abscess. Optimizing patient care

The medical literature regarding spinal epidural abscess has two common threads: reports of poor prognosis and appeals for rapid treatment. Spinal epidural abscess is a difficult diagnosis to make because of its rarity--many physicians will never see a case during their careers. Among all patients admitted to hospitals, the incidence is approximately one to two cases per 10,000. Only increased awareness and swift management of spinal epidural abscess will improve outcome. Our goal through this report is to enhance the recognition and treatment of spinal epidural abscess. We present 28 new cases of spinal epidural abscess, giving special attention to the peculiarities of the disease; we compile and analyze comprehensive data from cases from literature; and finally, we present the results of 16 retrospective personal interviews of infected patients.     

Usefulness of radiologic monitoring of epidural catheters using epidurography

INTRODUCTION: Peridural analgesia involves a segmental block which at the thoracic level allows for early pulmonary recovery after chest or high abdominal surgery. The approach is difficult in children for reasons related to anatomy, maintenance, insertion of the catheter and dosing. OBJECTIVE: To report the radiologic monitoring of epidural catheter placement by epidurography as a technique for placing the epidural catheter in 17 patients for whom postoperative analgesia was to be provided by the same route. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen children (aged from 2 to 12) were given general anesthesia followed by epidural anesthesia. After catheterization of the epidural space, 1 or 1-5 ml of contrast was injected. Immediately afterwards an X-ray of the thoracic or lumbar spinal column, as appropriate to each case, was obtained. Epidural analgesia was provided with a mixture of bupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl, in continuous perfusion or in fractionated doses. RESULTS: Placement of the catheter tip was confirmed in 17 cases by visualization of symmetry and the presence of contrast medium in the epidural space. In one case we observed extravasation of contrast medium, which had invaded the paravertebral space. The course was linear in 17 cases, with no looping. No complications related to injection of contrast medium were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Epidurography provides objective monitoring of tip placement and trajectory of epidural catheters, advantages which argue in favor of more frequent application of this imaging technique.     

Peridural anesthesia versus subarachnoid anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To compare technical and clinical differences between epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 64 pregnant women at term scheduled for elective cesarean section. Two groups were randomized: A) PD Group (n = 32): continuous epidural anesthesia by administration of bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1/400,000 via an epidural catheter. Epidural morphine 3 mg was administered at the end of surgery. B) SP Group (n = 32): "single shot" spinal anesthesia by intrathecal administration of hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine 1-1.4 ml plus morphine 0.2 mg. The pin prick block level reached T2-T6 at incision time. DATA COLLECTION: 1) Time from the beginning of anesthesia to surgical incision. 2) Hypotension episodes. 3) Ephedrine consumption. 4) Intraoperative discomfort at delivery, traction and uterine manipulation, peritoneal toilette. 5) Nausea and vomiting. 6) Apgar score. 7) Postoperative headache. RESULTS: Women in the SP group had more hypotensive episodes (81% vs 53%: p < 0.05) and more ephedrine consumption with a large individual variability (29.12 mg +/- 20.4 vs 12.83 +/- 13.8: p < 0.01) when compared to PD group, without any difference in the Apgar score. The SP group required less time consumption (10.5 min. +/- 6.7 vs 35.9 min. +/- 17.3: p < 0.01) and had less intraoperative discomfort with less analgesic and/or sedative drugs consumption (9.7% vs 29%: p < 0.05) and less vomiting (3% vs 22.5%: p < 0.05). No postoperative headache was noticed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the described pharmacological and technical approach, spinal anesthesia is more suitable than continuous epidural technique for cesarean section, unless contraindicated.     

Oral anticoagulant prophylaxis and epidural catheter removal

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of regional anesthesia in patients receiving anticoagulants is controversial. The purpose of this review is to document the incidence of neurologic complications with insertion and removal of an epidural catheter in patients receiving oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet medication. METHODS: A retrospective review was made of the charts of 459 patients who underwent hip pinning or hip or knee replacement under regional anesthesia and received postoperative epidural analgesia and warfarin thromboembolism prophylaxis. The number of patients receiving preoperative antiplatelet therapy and warfarin, as well as baseline coagulation parameters, was documented. For patients who had postoperative epidural analgesia, the prothrombin time on the day of epidural catheter removal was obtained. Neurologic complications during the hospital stay were noted. RESULTS: Spinal anesthesia was administered to 47 patients and epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia to 412. Before surgery, antiplatelet therapy was given to 270 and warfarin to 180 patients, with some patients receiving both. The mean +/- SD preoperative prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times were 10.8 +/- 1.2 seconds (normal, 9.6-11.1 seconds) and 27.5 +/- 3.5 seconds (normal, 24.6-33.2 seconds), respectively. Blood on needle or catheter insertion was noted in 21 patients, all of whom were taking antiplatelet medication and/or warfarin. Epidural catheters remained postoperatively for a mean of 43.6 +/- 12.5 hours (range 5-118 hours). The mean prothrombin time on the day of epidural catheter removal was 14.1 +/- 3.2 seconds. Four postoperative peripheral neuropathies were detected. There was no clinical evidence of spinal hematoma in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural catheter placement and removal in patients taking oral anticoagulants appears to be safe. Careful monitoring of the patient for evidence of spinal hematoma after epidural catheter removal is recommended.     

Attentional bias in active smokers, abstinent smokers, and nonsmokers

Pure autonomic failure is characterized by orthostatic hypotension, sweating disorder, urinary incontinence, and syncope. A 64 year-old man with pure autonomia failure was scheduled for suprapubic prostatectomy. We monitoring direct arterial pressure and inserted pulmonary artery catheter prior to the induction of anesthesia. General anesthesia was induced with diazepam 10 mg, fentanyl 0.3 mg, and vecuronium 8 mg for tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (0.2-1.5%), 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen supplemented with intermittent epidural anesthesia. During anesthesia, blood loss was immediately replaced with banked blood because autonomic failure could not compensate hypovolemia well. Epidural anesthesia in this patient was considered to cause less hypotension than in patients with normal autonomic function. Therefore, we think epidural anesthesia is a useful anesthesia method for patients with pure autonomic failure. The emergence from anesthesia was smooth and no complications were seen during the perioperative period.     

Comparison of lidocaine and saline for epidural top-up during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in volunteers

This study was designed to determine the efficacy of saline as an epidural top-up to prolong spinal anesthesia during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). Eight volunteers received three separate CSEAs with intrathecal lidocaine (50 mg). After two-segment regression, each subject received either a saline (10 mL), lidocaine 1.5% (10 mL), or control sham (0.5 mL saline) epidural injection in a randomized, double-blind, triple cross-over fashion. Sensory block was assessed by pinprick and tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent to surgical stimulation at the knee and ankle. Motor strength was assessed with iso-metric force dynamometry. Data were analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance and a paired t-test. Sensory block to pinprick was prolonged in the thoracolumbar dermatomes only by lidocaine (P < 0.05). Neither lidocaine nor saline prolonged the duration of tolerance to TES at the tested sites. Instead, saline decreased the duration of tolerance to TES by 20 and 24 min at the knee and ankle (P < 0.05). Recovery from motor block at the quadriceps was prolonged by an epidural injection of lidocaine (P < 0.05). We conclude that when 10 mL of epidural saline is administered after two-segment regression, it is an ineffective top-up and may decrease the duration of spinal anesthesia during CSEA.     

The epidural blood patch--current practices and concerns

Post dural puncture headache is a common sequelae of spinal and, sometimes, epidural anesthesia. Since 1960, the practice of placing autologous blood into the epidural space to treat spinal headache has been used with great success. The blood patch can provide immediate symptom relief from spinal headache and repair of the CSF leak, which is the basic mechanism of post dural puncture headache. Discrepancies exist in the literature and in today's common practice regarding technique and timing for this treatment. This is a procedure not without complications and requires caution. Contained herein are recommendations for safe and effective use of the epidural blood patch. Following these procedures, anesthetists will likely see an 85% to 98% immediate cure rate for post dural puncture headache with the fewest possible complications.