Higher nicotine and carbon monoxide levels in menthol cigarette smokers with and without schizophrenia.

This study examined whether smoking menthol cigarettes was associated with increased biochemical measures of smoke intake. Expired carbon monoxide (CO) and serum nicotine and cotinine were measured in 89 smokers with schizophrenia and 53 control smokers immediately after smoking an afternoon cigarette. Serum nicotine levels (27 vs. 22 ng/ml, p = .010), serum cotinine levels (294 vs. 240 ng/ml, p = .041), and expired CO (25 vs. 21 ppm, p = .029) were higher in smokers of menthol compared with nonmenthol cigarettes, with no differences in 3-hydroxycotinine/cotinine ratios between groups when controlling for race. Backward stepwise linear regression models showed that, in addition to having a diagnosis of schizophrenia, smoking menthol cigarettes was a significant predictor of nicotine and cotinine levels. Individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder smoked more generic or discount value brands (Basic, Doral, Monarch, USA, Wave, others) compared with control smokers (28% vs. 6%, p = .002) but did not smoke more brands with high nicotine delivery as estimated by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission method. Although rates of mentholated cigarette smoking were not higher in smokers with schizophrenia overall, they were significantly higher in non-Hispanic White people with schizophrenia compared with controls of the same ethnic/racial subgroup (51% vs. 28%, p<.0001). The higher exhaled CO in menthol smokers suggests that the higher nicotine levels are at least partly related to increased intake of smoke from menthol cigarettes, although menthol-mediated inhibition of nicotine metabolism also may be a factor. Menthol is an important cigarette additive that may help explain why some groups have lower quit rates and more smoking-caused disease.     

Cigarette nicotine yields and nicotine intake among Japanese male workers

OBJECTIVES: To analyse brand nicotine yield including "ultra low" brands (that is, cigarettes yielding less-than-or-equal 0.1 mg of nicotine by Federal Trade Commission (FTC) methods) in relation to nicotine intake (urinary nicotine, cotinine and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine) among 246 Japanese male smokers. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: Two companies in Osaka, Japan. SUBJECTS: 130 Japanese male workers selected randomly during their annual regular health check up and 116 Japanese male volunteers taking part in a smoking cessation programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Subjects answered a questionnaire about smoking habits. Following the interview, each participant was asked to smoke his own cigarette and, after extinguishing it, to blow expired air into an apparatus for measuring carbon monoxide concentration. Urine was also collected for the assays of nicotine metabolites. RESULTS: We found wide variation in urinary nicotine metabolite concentrations at any given nicotine yield. Based on one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the urinary nicotine metabolite concentrations of ultra low yield cigarette smokers were significantly lower compared to smokers of high (p = 0.002) and medium yield cigarettes (p = 0.017). On the other hand, the estimated nicotine intake per ultra low yield cigarette smoked (0.59 mg) was much higher than the 0.1 mg indicated by machine. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of Japanese male smokers, actual levels of nicotine intake bore little relation to advertised nicotine yield levels. Our study reinforces the need to warn consumers of inappropriate advertisements of nicotine yields, especially low yield brands.     

Efficacy of the nicotine inhaler in smoking reduction: A double-blind, randomized trial.

Many smokers are not ready to quit but are interested in changing their smoking behavior, particularly if such a change is associated with a reduction in health risk. The present study evaluated the efficacy of the nicotine inhaler in reducing smoking. Exploratory studies assessed whether reduction in smoking was associated with reduction in markers of disease risk. A total of 429 healthy smokers (smoking at least 20 cigarettes/day) were randomly assigned to either nicotine-containing or placebo inhalers, which subjects were allowed to use ad libitum for up to 1 year. The nicotine inhaler was significantly superior to placebo in achieving reduction in daily cigarette consumption by at least 50% after 4 months, compared with baseline (18% vs. 8%, p = .004). Active treatment promoted smoking cessation: 8% of subjects in the nicotine group and 1% in the placebo group were abstinent at month 15. Throughout the study, smoking reduction, per se, independent of treatment group, was associated with a statistically significant decrease in exhaled carbon monoxide and serum cotinine and thiocyanate. Smoking reduction also improved established risk markers for cardiovascular disease over 4 months. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the active and placebo groups. The most common treatment-related adverse events were throat irritation and cough. In conclusion, the nicotine inhaler can help smokers who are unable or unwilling to quit to reduce daily cigarette consumption, which may be a health benefit on its own and may further promote quitting.     

Effects of smoking cessation and reduction in asthmatics.

The present study examined the effect of smoking reduction and cessation on asthma regulation and biomarkers of exposure to cigarette smoke. In a prospective open design, we allocated 220 asthmatics among three groups: (a) Smoking reduction (reducers), with the aim of smoking fewer than seven cigarettes per day, (b) complete smoking cessation (abstainers), or (c) continuation of usual smoking (continuing smokers). Subjects used nicotine chewing gum or an oral nicotine inhaler to promote reduction and cessation. We monitored changes in the biomarkers carbon monoxide, cotinine, and thiocyanate, and in peak flow, medicine use, bronchial reactivity, and asthma symptoms. The analysis used the three outcome groups, regardless of original allocation to treatment groups. At 4 months, analysis of abstainers (n = 27), reducers (n = 33), and continuing smokers (n = 50) showed marked, statistically significant decreases in expired carbon monoxide of 17 ppm (abstainers) and 15 ppm (reducers); in plasma cotinine of 124 ng/ml (abstainers) and 122 ng/ml (reducers); and in plasma thiocyanate of 5.03 ng/ml (abstainers) and 3.74 ng/m (reducers). For abstainers, we observed improvements in the asthma-specific quality-of-life score, and reductions in self-reported day and night use of rescue beta2-agonists, in doses of inhaled corticosteroids, in daytime asthma symptoms, and in bronchial hyperreactivity. For reducers, smaller improvements occurred for night use of rescue beta2-agonists, doses of inhaled corticosteroids, and bronchial hyperreactivity. Smoking cessation resulted in a marked decrease in three biomarkers of cigarette smoke inhalation and improved asthma regulation, whereas smoking reduction had a less pronounced effect on biomarkers and only a small effect on asthma regulation.     

Acute effects of Advance: a potential reduced exposure product for smokers

OBJECTIVE: To examine the acute effects of Advance, a potential reduced exposure product (PREP) for smokers marketed as a means to reduce exposure to toxic gases and tobacco specific nitrosamines. Design, setting, participants: Latin square ordered, three condition, laboratory based, crossover design with 20 smokers of light or ultra-light cigarettes (15 or more cigarettes/day). In each 2.5 hour condition, participants completed an 8-puff smoking bout from their own brand, Advance, or an unlit cigarette (that is, sham smoking) every 30 minutes for a total of four bouts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subject rated measures of tobacco/nicotine withdrawal; carbon monoxide (CO), and heart rate; plasma nicotine concentrations. RESULTS: Relative to own brand, Advance produced similar withdrawal suppression and heart rate increase, lower CO boost, and higher plasma nicotine concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: PREPs for smokers need to be evaluated using a comprehensive strategy that includes empirical examination of acute and long term effects. Adequate withdrawal suppression and potentially lower concentrations of CO associated with Advance use are positive factors, although higher nicotine concentrations do not constitute "reduced exposure". Overall, longer exposure periods are necessary to determine carcinogen delivery. PREP evaluation is complex and should be completed objectively.     

Smoke constituent exposure and smoking topography of adolescent daily cigarette smokers.

Adolescent smoking prevalence is a major health concern, with 24.4% reporting smoking in the past 30 days and 15.8% considered daily smokers. The purpose of this study was to characterize biobehavioral nicotine dependence, smoke constituent exposure and smoking topography in adolescent daily smokers. Relationships among biological markers of nicotine dependence (nicotine boost, carbon monoxide [CO] boost and cotinine levels) with existing self-report measures (modified Fagerstr?m Tolerance Questionnaire [mFTQ] and the motivations for smoking scale) were examined. Gender differences were characterized. Fifty adolescents 13-18 years old were recruited for the study, 50% female. CO, plasma nicotine levels pre- and postcigarette, cotinine, and smoking topography were measured during a smoking bout with participant's usual cigarette. Average CO boost, pre- to postcigarette was 7.2 + 3.6 ppm, baseline cotinine level averaged 224.0 +/- 169.6 ng/ml and nicotine boost averaged 23.4 +/- 21.7 ng/ml. Mean puffs per cigarette was 14.2 +/- 6.3. Males had significantly higher total puff volumes, but similar smoke constituent exposure to females, and higher handling of cigarettes as smoking motive. In regression analysis, 35% of variance in tobacco use, as indicated by baseline cotinine concentration, was explained by maximum puff duration, postcigarette CO level, and nicotine dependence, as measured by the mFTQ. Results indicated adolescents had considerable smoke constituent exposure and nicotine dependence suggesting the importance of appropriate smoking cessation treatment.     

Sex-based and hormonal contraception effects on the metabolism of nicotine among adolescent tobacco-dependent smokers.

Variations in nicotine metabolism influence smoking patterns. Differences between sexes or related to sex hormones may affect nicotine metabolism. Because smoking initiation starts during adolescence, observations gathered from adolescent smokers might broaden our understanding of such sex-based differences. We tested the hypothesis that nicotine metabolism--as indexed primarily by the ratio of trans-3'-hydroxycotinine (3HC) to cotinine--is more rapid among adolescent girl smokers compared with boys and that regular use of hormonal contraceptives influences nicotine and cotinine metabolism. We also hypothesized that more rapid nicotine metabolism is associated with higher nicotine dependence as indexed by smoking frequency and morning urgency. Plasma samples of nicotine, cotinine, and 3HC concentrations were obtained from 120 adolescents (36 boys). Plasma nicotine and cotinine concentrations were similar in boys and girls. Median plasma 3HC concentrations were 44.45 ng/ml for girls versus 35.74 ng/ml for boys (p = .025), and median plasma 3HC-cotinine ratios were significantly higher in girls than in boys (0.317 vs. 0.253, p = .025). After stratifying girls into two groups based on use versus nonuse of hormonal contraception, plasma 3HC-cotinine ratios in girls using hormonal contraception (0.47) were substantially higher (p<.0001) than in boys (0.25) and were significantly higher than in girls not using hormonal contraception (0.28). Controlling for cigarettes smoked per day, ethnicity, and age did not modify these results. Although plasma nicotine, cotinine, or 3HC concentrations were significantly lower in less dependent adolescent smokers, nicotine and cotinine metabolite ratios were similar. This study showed that hormonal contraception in adolescent girls may accelerate cotinine metabolism, an effect likely related to induction of cytochrome P450 2A6 and independent of ethnicity and cigarette consumption. Prospective controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the role of hormonal contraception in patterns of adolescent smoking and nicotine metabolism.     

Nicotine, cotinine, withdrawal, and craving patterns during smoking and nicotine nasal spray use: results from a pilot study with African American men.

Nicotine intake via smoking is highly variable. Individualized dosing of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) may improve product efficacy, but a better understanding of the within-day and within-subject relationships between smoking, NRT use, nicotine and cotinine concentrations in blood, and cravings and withdrawal symptoms is needed to inform dosing algorithms. A pilot study was undertaken to collect data on these relationships and to assess the feasibility of the methods needed for this type of research, including a sophisticated statistical modeling technique (a two-part mixed-effects model with correlated random effects that accounts for clumping at zero). Because nicotine metabolism varies by gender and race, the sample was homogeneous with respect to these characteristics. In a within-subjects study, 27 African American adult male smokers carried a computerized cigarette dispenser for 1 week, capturing the time each cigarette was smoked. Subjects then entered an inpatient setting for 1 day of scheduled smoking (matched to data from the cigarette dispenser to create an ecologically valid schedule) and 4 days of ad libitum nicotine nasal spray use, while tobacco abstinent. Eight times per day, at 2-hour intervals, blood was drawn and ratings of cigarette cravings and withdrawal symptoms were obtained. On average, subjects used less than half of the manufacturer's recommended minimum daily dose of nicotine nasal spray. Large differences in nicotine and cotinine levels were observed between individuals. When predicting nicotine, cotinine, withdrawal, and cravings, we observed significant interactions between route of nicotine intake and a variety of independent variables.     

Characteristics of selectors of nicotine replacement therapy

Objective: To assess differences in demographic and smoking characteristics between smokers who have and have not used nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Design: Mail survey of US smokers from a national research panel. Participants: Smokers 18 years and over who returned a survey on smoking (n = 9630). The sample was weighted to match the US smoker population on age and sex. Main outcome measures: Compared smokers who had/had not used NRT in a quit attempt (ever NRT use or over the counter (OTC) NRT use) on: demographic characteristics, nicotine dependence, history of craving and withdrawal, expected difficulty quitting, and self reported history of smoking related medical illness and psychopathology. Results: NRT users (both ever-users and OTC users) were more likely to be older, male, and better educated. They were also heavier smokers, had experienced more craving and withdrawal upon quitting, and scored higher on measures of dependence. These differences were evident among light smokers, and remained even when smoking rate and time to first cigarette were controlled. Conclusion: Smokers who elect to use NRT differ from non-NRT users in ways that predispose them to failure in cessation. Controlling for smoking rate and time to first cigarette does not eliminate these differences, even among light smokers. These differences must be considered when comparing the effectiveness of NRT among samples of smokers who self select their treatment and are likely to bias such outcome comparisons.     

Tobacco specific nitrosamines and potential reduced exposure products for smokers: a preliminary evaluation of Advance

Objective: To develop a method for evaluating the carcinogen delivery of potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) like Advance^TM, a PREP marketed to reduce smokers' exposure to one tobacco specific nitrosamine (TSN), NNK, a potent lung carcinogen.

Design, setting, and participants: Latin square ordered, three condition, outpatient, crossover design with 12 smokers of light or ultra-light cigarettes (15 or more cigarettes/day). In each five day condition, participants either smoked own brand, Advance^TM, or no cigarettes. Also, on the first and last day of each condition, participants smoked one cigarette in the laboratory.

Main outcome measures: Subject rated measures of tobacco/nicotine withdrawal, expired air carbon monoxide, urine concentrations of cotinine and NNAL (one TSN biomarker), puff volume, duration, number, and interpuff interval.

Results: Relative to own brand, Advance^TM produced similar withdrawal suppression, slightly lower carbon monoxide, equivalent cotinine, and 51% lower NNAL concentrations. The lowest cotinine and NNAL concentrations were observed in the no cigarette condition. Participants took fewer puffs when smoking Advance^TM.

Conclusions: Past experience with PREPs that failed to reduce smoking's harm demonstrates the need for clinical methods in PREP evaluation. This study shows how assessing PREP induced changes in withdrawal and exposure to carbon monoxide, nicotine, and carcinogens may help predict PREP harm reduction potential. Adequate withdrawal suppression, slightly lower concentrations of carbon monoxide, and reduction of one TSN biomarker were observed for Advance^TM. In the future, clinical methods like those described here may be valuable for evaluating PREPs before they are marketed publicly.

     

Roll-your-own smoke yields: theoretical and practical aspects

OBJECTIVE—To identify the key parameters that influence smoke yields from roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes and to compare smoke yields of cigarettes made under laboratory conditions with those made by habitual RYO consumers.
DESIGN AND SETTING—One-way parametric variations in the laboratory-based production of RYO cigarettes complemented by a consumer survey conducted in a busy street at Romford, Essex, United Kingdom.
SUBJECTS—26 habitual RYO consumers.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Cigarette weights, puff numbers, and yields (carbon monoxide, nicotine, and tar).
RESULTS—Smoke yields vary for specimen changes in weight of tobacco used, paper porosity, and the incorporation of a filter in the cigarette. Yields of cigarettes produced by 26 RYO smokers ranged from 9.9 to 21.0 mg tar per cigarette and from 0.9 to 1.8 mg nicotine per cigarette, and were generally lower than yields of laboratory-produced RYO cigarettes.
CONCLUSIONS—Laboratory studies can provide useful information concerning the parameters that affect smoke yields of RYO cigarettes such as the incorporation of a filter to reduce yields. However, such studies must be complemented by surveys of cigarettes made by actual current RYO smokers. In one such investigation, it was found that the mean tar yields from cigarettes produced by 57% of the smokers were above the current maximum of 15 mg per cigarette for manufactured cigarettes. Currently 8% of manufactured cigarettes in the UK have a declared nicotine yield of greater than 1.1 mg per cigarette whereas 77% of RYO smokers produced cigarettes with a nicotine yield greater than this value.


Keywords: roll-your-own cigarettes; smoke yield; carbon monoxide; tar; nicotine     

Aiding reduction of smoking with nicotine replacement medications: hope for the recalcitrant smoker?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the various nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) on smoking reduction. DESIGN: During an initial sampling week, the subjects familiarised themselves with nicotine gum, patch, nasal spray, vaporiser (vapour inhaler) and sublingual tablet. A crossover design was used during the next four study weeks; during two of these weeks the subjects could select one nicotine replacement product of their choice to use, whereas during the other two they were randomly assigned a product to use. SUBJECTS: 143 men and women smoking an average of 22.6 (SD 7.0) cigarettes per day and exhibiting a Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) score of 7.0 (SD 1.9). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were asked to use as much NRT as they wished, yet to smoke enough to feel comfortable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self- reported cigarette consumption, exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), withdrawal symptom score, cotinine plasma levels and motivation to quit were monitored over a period of five weeks. RESULTS: Self-reported smoking declined steadily over the five weeks, from 22.6 (SD 7.0) to 10.4 (SD 1.0) (P<0.001) cigarettes daily (54% decrease), with the biggest drop (37%) during the first product-sampling week. Smoking reduction was greater on average during the weeks when the subjects could choose their nicotine product than when products were assigned. CO readings decreased from 22.7 (SD 8.5) to 14.8 (SD 8.4) ppm (P<0.001) confirming a reduction in smoking (35% decrease), although cotinine levels remained steady, suggesting that subjects were titrating nicotine to their original levels. Withdrawal scores decreased over time (32% decrease, P<0.001), showing that there was no discomfort associated with the smoking reduction, and motivation to quit was enhanced by the treatment in most subjects (93%). CONCLUSIONS: NRT for aiding smoking reduction appeared to be safe, was associated with a clinically significant reduction in smoke exposure over a five-week follow up, and increased motivation to stop smoking. A smoking reduction procedure may help the very recalcitrant smoker gain confidence and increase the control over his/her smoking behaviour. More controlled research is needed to follow up these promising results.


     

Pilot study on lower nitrosamine smokeless tobacco products compared with medicinal nicotine.

Smokeless tobacco (ST) products have the potential to be used as a harm reduction method for cigarette smokers. These products can deliver significantly less toxicants than cigarettes, although they are not toxicant free nor harmless. It is important to examine potential health risks and benefits of these products. These two small pilot studies examined the effects of two different ST products (Exalt and Ariva) compared with medicinal nicotine, another potential harm reduction product. Dependent, healthy adult cigarette smokers, who were motivated to quit smoking, underwent 1 week of baseline smoking measurement. They were then asked to quit smoking and were randomly assigned to use either an ST product or a medicinal nicotine lozenge (MNL, Commit) for 2 weeks, then crossed over to use the other product for 2 weeks. In the last week, following the sampling phase, subjects could choose the product they wished to use. Assessments were made repeatedly during baseline cigarette use and throughout the 5 weeks of treatment. Outcome measures included biomarkers for tobacco exposure and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses. Tobacco-specific carcinogen uptake was greater from Exalt than from the MNL, and was comparable between the MNL and Ariva. Physiological effects and subjective effects on withdrawal and craving were comparable among Exalt, Ariva, and the MNL. Ariva was preferred over the MNL, which was preferred over Exalt. With the exception of medicinal nicotine products, low-nitrosamine ST products have the greatest potential to result in reduced toxicant exposure compared with other combustible reduced exposure products and have promise for reducing individual risk for disease. However, the population effect of marketing of such products as reduced exposure/reduced risk is unknown. The need for further research in this area and regulation of tobacco products is evident.     

Clinical laboratory evaluation of potential reduced exposure products for smokers.

Smoking-related cancer and other disease account for more than 400,000 U.S. deaths annually. Smoking cessation reduces smoking-related disease rates, but relapse rates are high. Thus, interest in reducing the harm of continued smoking is growing. Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) are marketed to reduce smokers' exposure to smoke toxicants such as carbon monoxide (CO) and carcinogens and may be harm reduction tools. New PREPs are proliferating, but past experience with "low-yield" cigarettes that failed to reduce smokers' toxicant exposure suggests that comprehensive evaluation is necessary to predict if these new products are likely to alter the harm caused by smoking. The purpose of the study was to develop clinical laboratory methods for PREP evaluation. Smokers (N = 35) completed four, 5-day conditions that differed by product used: Advance, Eclipse, own brand cigarettes, or no cigarettes. Carcinogen (as assessed by one nitrosamine and one polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biomarker) and nicotine exposure were assessed via thrice-weekly urine sampling. Withdrawal symptoms were measured daily, and smoking behavior was assessed on the first and last day of each condition. Relative to own brand, Advance reduced exposure to the nitrosamine NNK and CO, and Eclipse reduced exposure to nicotine and the nitrosamine NNK, increased exposure to CO, and resulted in larger, longer, and more frequent puffs. No smoking reduced exposure to the nitrosamine NNK, CO, and nicotine, whereas withdrawal was elevated (all p values <.05). Clinical laboratory evaluation of PREPs for smokers is valuable for measuring users' smoke toxicant exposure, withdrawal, and smoking behavior and should be incorporated into a comprehensive PREP evaluation strategy.     

Rate of nicotine onset from nicotine replacement therapy and acute responses in smokers.

The subjective and reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse may depend partly on their rate of onset, with faster acting formulations typically producing stronger effects than slower ones. In this within-subjects study, we examined the acute effects of nicotine replacement therapy via nicotine nasal spray (fast delivery) vs. transdermal nicotine patch (slow delivery) on craving, withdrawal, cardiovascular responses, subjective ratings, and reinforcing effects of smoking. Smokers (N=30) not seeking treatment participated in three sessions, each after overnight smoking abstinence, involving 14-mg nicotine (Nicoderm) or placebo patch, followed 4 hr later by intermittent administration of nicotine (Nicotrol) or placebo nasal spray. Specifically, the three group comparisons were nicotine patch condition (with placebo spray), nicotine spray condition (with placebo patch), and placebo condition (placebo spray and patch). Nicotine patch and nicotine spray were never administered in the same session. Blood nicotine levels were similar between nicotine patch and nicotine spray conditions, by design. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were higher following nicotine spray vs. the other conditions, as hypothesized. However, other than reductions in craving related to nicotine spray and patch at some points, no differences between conditions were observed in withdrawal, subjective effects of sprays and smoking, or smoking reinforcement assessed by a computer task. Thus, under these acute conditions, the speed of nicotine delivery from nasal spray vs. patch differentially affected cardiovascular responses and perhaps craving but did not influence withdrawal, subjective ratings, and smoking reinforcement.     

烟碱依赖和祛烟碱依赖研究进展

烟草依赖有多种因素,如心理因素,环境因素和生理因素等,其中的物质基础是烟草中的烟碱与脑中烟碱受体的相互作用。目前对烟碱依赖的治疗方法包括药物治疗如烟碱替代疗法的烟碱贴剂、口胶、鼻喷雾剂和吸入剂等,采用乙酰胆碱受体(nAChR)抑制剂药物治疗,心理治疗、针灸和中药治疗等,这些方法表现出不同程度的祛烟瘾效果。本文就烟碱依赖和祛烟碱依赖的研究进展做一综述。     

Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk

Context: The tobacco industry is introducing modified tobacco products claiming to reduce the risk of smoking (potential reduced exposure products, PREPs). If PREPs are perceived as safe, they may deter smokers from quitting and encourage re-initiation by smokers who have quit.

Objective: To assess smokers' and ex-smokers' perceptions of PREPs and the impact of PREP claims on interest in quitting (among smokers) or in resuming smoking (ex-smokers).

Design: A random-digit-dialled survey of US smokers and ex-smokers. We used Eclipse, a modified PREP cigarette, as an exemplar PREP. During the survey, the interviewer read risk reduction claims made for Eclipse by its manufacturer, assessing smokers' interest in quitting before and after the exposure.

Participants: 1000 current cigarette smokers and 499 ex-smokers (300 quit within the last two years), over 18 years old.

Main outcome measures: Perception of risk reduction from Eclipse; interest in using Eclipse; smokers' interest in quitting was assessed using a stage of change approach (pre- and post-exposure to claims).

Results: 91% of smokers thought Eclipse was safer than regular cigarettes. 24% believed Eclipse was completely safe. 57.4% of smokers were interested in using Eclipse; interest was greatest among smokers who were contemplating quitting. Exposure to Eclipse's claims was followed by reduced interest in quitting. Among all ex-smokers, interest in Eclipse was 6.2%, but interest was 15.2% among young adults (18–25 years) who had stopped smoking within two years.

Conclusions: There is substantial risk that smokers will overinterpret reduced risk claims made for modified tobacco products. PREPs appeal to smokers who are contemplating quitting and exposure to reduced risk product claims appears to reduce smokers' readiness to quit. PREPs also appealed to young adults who had recently stopped smoking. Thus, reduced risk tobacco product claims can undermine adult cessation and youth prevention, possibly resulting in increased harm even if the products are less toxic.

     

Effects of smoking abstinence, smoking cues and nicotine replacement in smokers with schizophrenia and controls.

The mechanisms underlying the low smoking cessation rates among smokers with schizophrenia (SS) are unknown. In this laboratory study, we compared the responses of 21 SS and 21 non-psychiatric controls (CS) to manipulations of 5-hour smoking abstinence, transdermal nicotine replacement (0 mg, 21 mg and 42 mg), and in vivo smoking cues. Results indicate that SS were more sensitive than CS to the effects of acute abstinence on carbon monoxide (CO) boost, but not more sensitive to the effects of abstinence on urge levels or withdrawal symptoms. SS and CS did not differ in urge response to in vivo smoking cues, but SS were less consistent in their reactions. These findings suggest that heightened sensitivity to the effects of abstinence on smoke intake may partially account for the low cessation rates experienced by SS, but other potential mechanisms should be explored using behavioral laboratory models.     

Smoking behaviour and toxin exposure during six weeks use of a potential reduced exposure product: Omni

Objective: To determine smoking behaviour, acceptability, and toxin exposure when smokers switch to the potential reduced exposure product—Omni cigarette.

Design: 12 week randomised, crossover study of Omni versus own cigarettes.

Participants: 19 light/ultralight and 15 regular smokers.

Outcomes: Cigarettes/day, smoking topography, craving, withdrawal symptoms, urinary cotinine plus its glucuronide (total cotinine), nicotine plus its glucuronide (total nicotine), and carcinogen metabolites (4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol plus its glucuronides and 1-hydroxypyrene).

Results: When switched to Omni, smokers smoked the same number of cigarettes/day, smoked Omni cigarettes less intensely (total puff volume = –11%) and had slightly lower total cotinine (–18%) levels than their own cigarettes, but had a slightly greater carbon monoxide boost/cig (+21%). Craving and withdrawal ratings were similar with Omni and own cigarettes. Carcinogen metabolite levels were somewhat but not significantly lower with Omni. About half of smokers rated Omni as better for their health and about two thirds stated it was weaker and worse tasting than their own cigarettes.

Conclusions: Although Omni may be an adequate behavioural and pharmacological substitute for traditional cigarettes, it may not decrease carcinogen exposure and may increase carbon monoxide. Replications with larger sample sizes and longer follow up are needed. These results indicate the need for regulation of reduced exposure and reduced risk claims.