Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice – 2019 Update

PurposeA survey in 2015 identified a high level of eye care practitioner concern about myopia with a reported moderately high level of activity, but the vast majority still prescribed single vision interventions to young myopes. This research aimed to update these findings 4 years later.MethodsA self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in eight languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy of available strategies and adoption levels of such strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.ResultsOf the 1336 respondents, concern was highest (9.0 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) in Asia and lowest (7.6 ± 2.2; p < 0.001) in Australasia. Practitioners from Asia also considered their clinical practice of myopia control to be the most active (7.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.001), the North American practitioners being the least active (6.3 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by pharmaceutical approaches and approved myopia control soft contact lenses (p < 0.001). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall, most practitioners did not consider single-vision distance under-correction to be an effective strategy for attenuating myopia progression (79.6 %), but prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients (63.6 ± 21.8 %). The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (20.6 %) and inadequate information (17.6 %).ConclusionsWhile practitioner concern about myopia and the reported level of activity have increased over the last 4 years, the vast majority of eye care clinicians still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. With recent global consensus evidence-based guidelines having been published, it is hoped that this will inform the practice of myopia management in future.     

The effect of concentric and aspheric multifocal soft contact lenses on binocular vision in young adult myopes

PurposeMultifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) are prescribed to inhibit myopia progression; these include aspheric and concentric designs. The effects of MFCLs on visual quality, accommodation and vergence in young-adult myopes were evaluated.MethodsParticipants were twenty-six myopes (19–25 years, spherical equivalent ?0.50 to ?5.75D), with normal binocular vision and no past myopia control. Pupil sizes were 4.4 ± 0.9 mm during distance viewing and 3.7 ± 0.8 mm at near. In random order, participants wore four MFCLs: Proclear single vision distance, MiSight concentric dual focus (+2.00D), distance center aspheric (Biofinity, +2.50D) (CooperVision lenses), and NaturalVue aspheric (Visioneering Technologies). Testing included visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson), stereoacuity, accommodation response, negative and positive relative accommodation, horizontal phorias, horizontal fusional vergence and AC/A ratio, and a visual quality questionnaire.ResultsThe four lenses differed in distance (p = 0.001) and near visual acuity (p = 0.011), and contrast sensitivity (p = 0.001). Compared with the single vision lens, the Biofinity aspheric had the greatest visual impact: 0.19 ± 0.14 logMAR distance acuity reduction, 0.22 ± 0.15 log contrast sensitivity reduction. Near acuity was affected less than distance acuity; the reduction was greatest with the NaturalVue (0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR reduction). The MFCLs altered the autorefraction measure at distance and near (p = 0.001); the accommodation response was less with aspheric lenses. Negative relative accommodation reduced with the aspheric lenses (p = 0.001): by 0.9 ± 0.5D with Biofinity and 0.5 ± 0.7D with NaturalVue. Exophoric shifts were greater with aspheric lenses (1.8 ± 2.4Δ Biofinity, 1.7 ± 1.7Δ NaturalVue) than with the concentric MiSight (0.5 ± 1.3Δ).ConclusionsMFCLs alter visual performance, refraction and vergence; two aspheric lenses had greater effect than a concentric lens.     

Orthokeratology lenses with increased compression factor (OKIC): A 2-year longitudinal clinical trial for myopia control

PurposeTo investigate the effectiveness of orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses and corneal changes with increased compression factor for myopia control over a 2-year period.MethodsYoung participants (age: 6–<12 years), with low myopia (0.50–4.00 D) and low astigmatism (≤1.25 D), were recruited and allowed to choose to wear either single-vision spectacles or ortho-k lenses (randomly assigned to compression factor of either 0.75 or 1.75 D). Axial length and cycloplegic refraction were measured at six monthly intervals for two years by a masked examiner. The myopia control effectiveness was determined by axial elongation.ResultsA significant number of control (63 %) dropped out, mainly due to concern about myopia progression (58 %). A total of 75 participants (mean age: 9.3 ± 1.0 years; control: n = 11, ortho-k [0.75 D]: n = 29, ortho-k [1.75 D]: n = 35) completed the study. Considering ortho-k groups only, the mean axial elongation of participants wearing ortho-k lenses of conventional compression factor (0.75 D) and increased compression factor (1.75 D) were 0.53 ± 0.29 and 0.35 ± 0.29 mm, respectively, over the 2-year study period. The between-group differences in corneal health were not significant at all visits.ConclusionParticipants wearing ortho-k lenses of increased compression factor further slowed axial elongation by 34%, when compared with the conventional compression factor without compromising corneal health. Further investigations are warranted to confirm the potential mechanism of an increased compression factor for improved myopia control effectiveness.     

Anterior eye shape in emmetropes,low to moderate myopes,and high myopes

PurposeMyopia prevalence has increased in recent years, including the levels of high myopia. While myopia has been associated with scleral remodelling and changes in posterior scleral shape, there has been little research examining how myopia affects in-vivo anterior sclera shape. We compared anterior scleral shape in emmetropes, low to moderate myopes, and high myopes.MethodsIn this prospective study, the Eye Surface Profiler instrument was used to quantify anterior eye surface shapes of forty-five young adult participants (58 % females) aged between 18 and 35 years, including 15 emmetropes, 15 low to moderate myopes, and 15 high myopes. Sagittal height and axial radius of curvature of regions over the nasal and temporal corneal periphery and anterior sclera were exported and analysed.ResultsAfter quality control of the data, 39 and 43 subjects had data analysed from the nasal and temporal sides, respectively. The nasal sides of the surfaces of the corneal periphery and anterior sclera had greater sagittal height in high myopes than in emmetropes across all regions (mean sagittal heights 2.44 ± 0.07 and 2.21 ± 0.04 mm, respectively, p = 0.02), but no significant differences were found between low to moderate myopes with emmetropes or with high myopes. No significant refractive group differences occurred for temporal anterior eye surface height. High myopes’ nasal-temporal asymmetry of sagittal height was less than of emmetropes (means 0.20 ± 0.07 and 0.46 ± 0.06 mm, respectively, p = 0.02). High myopes also exhibited less nasal-temporal axial radius of curvature asymmetry than emmetropes (mean 0.35 ± 0.08 and 0.71 ± 0.08 mm, respectively, p = 0.01) across all regions.ConclusionsHigh myopes exhibited a different anterior eye surface shape than emmetropes, having greater sagittal height in the nasal corneal periphery and anterior sclera. There was less nasal-temporal asymmetry of sagittal height and axial radius of curvature in high myopes than in emmetropes. Asymmetric growth of the eye associated with myopia development may be the underlying reason. These findings have implications for design of contact lenses, particularly soft and larger rigid lenses such as mini-sclerals.     

The efficacy of multifocal soft contact lenses for the alleviation of asthenopic symptoms in myopes with accommodative lag

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of multifocal soft contact lenses to reduce asthenopic symptoms in myopes with accommodative lag.MethodsTwenty-four myopic participants, aged 18–35 years, with mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of ≤ -0.75D, were recruited in a randomised, double-blind crossover study. All participants were existing contact lens wearer with near orthophoria or esophoria, presenting with subjective asthenopic symptoms at baseline [Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) score ≥ 21] and a lag of accommodation ≥ +0.75 D. All participants were initially fitted with single vision contact lenses for a one month period. Participants were then randomly assigned 1:1 to wear low add or high add multifocal soft contact lenses for a further month. After this period, the groups were reversed. Data were collected at baseline and following one month’s wear of each lens. Change in CISS score was evaluated as the primary outcome measure, while secondary outcome measures were changes in accommodative lag and heterophoria status.ResultsBaseline CISS score was (mean ± SD) 25.04 ± 4.58. Post-intervention scores were as follows: single vision: 24.46 ± 4.59, low add: 12.17 ± 6.89, high add: 13.71 ± 7.23. Both low add and high add multifocal soft contact lens wear was associated with an improvement in CISS score compared to baseline CISS and single vision (all p < 0.01). No significant difference was found between the CISS score for the baseline CISS and single vision (p = 1.00). No significant difference was found in lag of accommodation between lens conditions (all p > 0.05), however, there was an exophoric shift in near heterophoria between single vision and both multifocal contact lenses (low add: (mean difference 1.33 Δ, p = 0.02; high add: mean difference 1.23 Δ, p = 0.02) but not between habitual spectacle or any other modality (all p > 0.05).ConclusionsThe use of multifocal soft contact lenses for a one-month period was associated with reduced severity of asthenopic symptoms in pre-presbyopic myopes with accommodative lag. Whilst improvement of symptoms does not appear to be mediated by a significant reduction in accommodative lag, changes in heterophoria may play a role in reducing asthenopic symptoms.     

A comparison of vision-related quality of life between Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lenses and single-vision spectacles in Chinese children

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) between Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lenses and single-vision spectacles in Chinese children, in order to evaluate their visual performance and subjective acceptance of this bifocal designed contact lenses treatment.MethodsChinese participants aged 7 to 12 years, with myopia of ?4.00 to ?0.75 D, astigmatism < 1.50 D, and monocular best-corrected visual acuity 0.0 or better, were recruited in the study. All participants had been wearing DISC lenses, or single-vision spectacles, for the last 6 to 18 months and were requested to complete the routine ocular examination and Chinese version of the Pediatric Refractive Error Profile (PREP 2) questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 7 scales: vision, symptoms, appearance, activities, handling, peer perception, and overall score. According to their habitual correction modalities, fifty-four children were allocated to the DISC group and 56 to the single-vision spectacles group. A generalized linear model was fitted to assess variables associated with the PREP 2 score.ResultsParticipants wearing DISC lenses scored significantly higher than those wearing single-vision spectacles for vision, appearance, activities, peer perception, and overall (all P < 0.05). The improvement of VRQoL in the DISC group was mainly represented in appearance, peer perception, and activities. The quality of life improved more for older participants on scales of vision, symptoms, handling, appearance, and overall score (all P < 0.05). The interaction between treatment and age was statistically significant for the activities scale (P < 0.05).ConclusionDISC lens wear significantly improves VRQoL in Chinese children compared with single-vision spectacles for most of the survey scales, especially in the areas of appearance, peer perception, and activities. The benefits provided by DISC lenses contribute to greater satisfaction than single-vision spectacles for myopic children.     

Orthokeratology in adults and effect on quality of life

ObjectiveTo determine changes in various ocular parameters of adults wearing orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses and their levels of satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) after commencing treatment.MethodsAdults aged 18–38 years, with mild to moderate myopia and astigmatism < 1.50D, were wearing ortho-k lenses for one year. Data collection, which included history taking, refraction, axial length (AL), corneal topography, corneal biomechanics, and biomicroscopy examination, was performed at baseline and every 6 months during the study period. The level of satisfaction with the treatment and QoL was determined via questionnaires.ResultsForty-four subjects completed the study. AL was shortened significantly at the 12-month visit: AL −0.03 (-0.45 to 0.13) mm compared to baseline (p < 0.05). A significant number of subjects in both groups presented with overall and central corneal staining, but the majority were mild (Grade 1). Central endothelial cell density was reduced by 40/mm² (loss rate 1.4 %) (p < 0.05). High scores were obtained in the satisfaction questionnaire, with no significant differences between visits. At the 12-month visit, NEI-RQL-42 total score, dependence on correction, activity limitation, appearance, and satisfaction with the treatment all significantly increased compared to baseline values.ConclusionsResults suggest that ortho-k can be an effective and safe myopia correction technique for adults with low to moderate myopia, improving daytime vision without serious adverse events. Satisfaction with ortho-k lens wear was high, particularly those who were dependent on vision correction and found spectacles or contact lenses limiting specific activities or cosmetically undesirable.     

A comparative study of visual function of young myopic adults wearing contact lenses vs. spectacles

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of contact lenses wear vs. spectacles wear on visual function of young adults with mild to moderate myopia.Methods57 students (27 male and 30 female) with a mean age of 23 years old participated in the study. Their mean best corrected visual acuity was 10/10 binocularly, all suffered from mild to moderate myopia (?3.75 sph/SD 1.25 sph) and they were both contact lenses and spectacles wearers. The VF-14 questionnaire was administered to assess the contact lenses wear vs. spectacles wear impact score on general daily living among the young individuals. It was used translated in Greek after following the ‘translation-back translation’ procedure.ResultsThe mean VF-14 score among spectacles and contact lenses wearers was 100 and 86.78 (SD 4.08) respectively. Although there was a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), both scores were related to a satisfactory functional vision for daily living. The contact lenses wearers were facing difficulty especially while driving at night, seeing steps, as well as doing fine handwork (i.e. sewing, knitting or carpentry).ConclusionsThe use of both spectacles and contact lenses provides satisfactory visual functioning for daily activities in young individuals suffering from mild to moderate myopia. However, there is a spectacles’ wear superiority in personal satisfaction when compared to contact lenses.     

Dynamics of the accommodative response and facility with dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of using dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control on the dynamics of the accommodative response and facility.Methods24 young adult myopes were fitted with dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control (MiSight®) and single-vision soft contact lenses (Proclear®). The WAM-5500 open-field autorefractor was used to measure the dynamics of the accommodative response (magnitude and variability) in binocular conditions, with accommodative data being gathered from the dominant eye, at three viewing distances (500 cm, 40 cm, and 20 cm) during 90 s. Also, the binocular accommodative facility was assessed with the WAM-5500 autorefractor. All participants performed the same experimental protocol with the dual-focus (MiSight) and single-vision (Proclear) soft contact lenses, with both experimental sessions being carried in two different days and following a counterbalanced order.ResultsThis study showed greater lags of accommodation with the MiSight than the Proclear lenses at near distances (40 cm: 1.27 ± 0.77 vs. 0.68 ± 0.37 D, corrected p-value = 0.002, Cohen-d = 0.90; and 20 cm: 1.47 ± 0.84 vs. 1.01 ± 0.52 D, corrected p-value = 0.007, Cohen-d = 0.75), whereas a higher variability of accommodation was observed with the dual-focus than the single-vision lenses at 500 cm (0.53 ± 0.11 vs. 0.23 ± 0.10 D), 40 cm (0.82 ± 0.31 vs. 0.68 ± 0.37 D), and 20 cm (1.50 ± 0.56 vs. 1.15 ± 0.39 D) (corrected p-value < 0.001 in all cases, and Cohen-ds = 0.67–2.33). Also, a worse quantitative (27.75 ± 8.79 vs. 34.29 ± 10.08 cycles per minute, p = 0.029, Cohen-d = 0.48) and qualitative (23.68 ± 7.12 vs. 28.43 ± 7.97 score, p = 0.039, Cohen-d = 0.45) performance was observed with the MiSight when compared to the Proclear lenses.ConclusionsThe use of dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control alters the dynamics of accommodative response and facility in the short-term. Although this optical design has demonstrated its effectiveness for myopia control, eye care specialists should be aware of the acute effects of these lenses on accommodation performance.     

Decreased effectiveness of 0.01% atropine treatment for myopia control during prolonged COVID-19 lockdowns

The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 and its' accompanied lockdowns impacted the entire globe in ways the world is only beginning to comprehend. In Israel, children age 9–15 had not been in a frontal classroom and been socially restricted from March 2020 till March 2021. Fourteen of these children that had been under myopia control treatment which had been effective prior to the pandemic were included in this retrospective study to learn if their myopia continued to stay under control, or if the unique environmental modifications affected their progression. The results showed that average increase in spherical equivalent refraction and axial length, measured with optical biometer OA-2000 (Tomey GmbH, Nagoya, Japan), during the year of lockdowns was ?0.73 ± 0.46D/0.46 ± 0.31 mm respectively, while the average increase in the year prior was ?0.33 ± 0.27D/0.24 ± 0.21 mm. Though several articles have indicated the pandemic environment has influenced myopia progression in children, this communication indicates a possible significant impact of the environment on myopia increase even in individuals under effective atropine treatment. These children's' progression suggests practitioners consider and address multiple aspects simultaneously when attempting myopia control.     

Controlling anisomyopia in children by orthokeratology: A one-year randomised clinical trial

PurposeTo investigate the effects of overnight orthokeratology (OK) lenses wear on the interocular axial length (AL) difference in anisomyopic children.MethodsSixty anisomyopic children (8–14 years old) were enrolled in this one-year prospective, randomised controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned to wear OK lenses (OK group) or single-vision spectacles (control group). AL was monitored at baseline and every six months using an IOL Master biometer, and axial elongation and interocular AL differences were compared between the groups.ResultsIn the control group, the more myopic eyes had similar axial elongation (0.36 ± 0.17 mm) to the less myopic eyes (0.37 ± 0.17 mm) at the one-year follow-up (P > 0.05). In the OK group, the less myopic eyes exhibited significantly greater axial elongation (0.24 ± 0.17 mm) than the more myopic eyes (0.13 ± 0.13 mm) at the one-year follow-up (P < 0.05). The mean interocular AL difference significantly decreased in the OK group over one year, from 0.47 ± 0.24 mm to 0.35 ± 0.22 mm (P < 0.05). However, the mean interocular AL difference decreased only slightly in the control group, from 0.56 ± 0.28 mm to 0.55 ± 0.28 mm (P > 0.05).ConclusionThis randomised, controlled study demonstrated that OK reduces the interocular AL difference in anisomyopic children due to stronger myopic control of the more myopic eye.     

Orthokeratology reshapes eyes to be less prolate and more symmetric

PurposeThis prospective study assessed the influence of wearing and then discontinuing orthokeratology (OK) lenses on retinal shape and peripheral refraction in myopic children.MethodsFifty-eight myopic children (age 8–12 years) were equally divided into an OK group and a single vision spectacles (SVS) group. After 12 months of OK, it was discontinued for 1 month. Peripheral eye length (PEL), relative peripheral refraction (RPR), and corneal parameters were measured in the right eye on the nasal and temporal retinal sides at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months (13 months in OK group) visits.ResultsIn the SVS group, faster elongation of the temporal side PEL made the eyes more asymmetric and prolate, developing a temporal pointed shape. In the OK group, the nasal retinal side PEL grew faster, the nasal RPR developed less hyperopic defocus, and the eye shape became more symmetric and less prolate. The central cornea became thinner and flattened, while the peripheral cornea became steeper. Changes in corneal thickness, relative peripheral corneal power, and K-values were no significant differences for the OK and SVS groups at 12 months.ConclusionsThe cornea reverted to be no difference with myopic children with SVS after 1 month discontinuation of OK. The retinal shape of SVS eyes became more asymmetric and prolate with myopia progression. OK remodelled retinal shape to be less asymmetric and less prolate.     

Near binocular visual function in young adult orthokeratology versus soft contact lens wearers

Purpose

To compare near point binocular vision function of young adult myopes wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses to matched single vision soft disposable contact lens (SCL) wearers.

High myopia-partial reduction orthokeratology (HM-PRO): Study design

PurposeTo report the study design and preliminary results of a pilot study, High Myopia-Partial Reduction Orthokeratology study.MethodsChildren with myopia of 6.00D or above and who satisfied the recruitment criteria were randomly assigned to partial reduction orthokeratology (PR ortho-k) and spectacle-wearing control groups. The myopia of the PR ortho-k children were partially reduced using custom made 4-zone ortho-k lenses of target 4.00D. Residual refractive errors were corrected with single vision spectacles. Control subjects were fully corrected with single vision spectacles. PR ortho-k subjects were also required to return for assessment after the first overnight lens wear, and one week and one month after lens wear.ResultsFifty-two eligible subjects were randomly assigned to PR ortho-k group (n = 26) and control group (n = 26). The median age of each group was 10.00 years. The median (range) subjective myopia of the right eye at baseline was 6.41D (5.00–8.00D) and 6.22D (6.00–8.00D) for PR ortho-k and spectacle groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Nineteen (79%) PR ortho-k subjects achieved successful lens fit at the one month visit and the median myopic reduction was 3.75D in the right eye. The incidence of (mild) corneal staining in PR ortho-k subjects reduced from 30% at the first overnight lens wear to 16% at the 1-month visit. Corneal pigmented arc was observed in 32% of PR ortho-k subjects at the 1-month visit.ConclusionsPR ortho-k was successfully applied to high myopic children with no significant changes in ocular health/best corrected visual acuity after one month of lens wear.     

Short-term effects of atropine combined with orthokeratology (ACO) on choroidal thickness

PurposeTo analyse the one-month change in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFChT) of myopic children treated with 0.01 % atropine, orthokeratology (OK), or their combination.MethodsThis is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. One hundred fifty-four children aged between 8 and 12 years with a spherical equivalent (SE) of -1.00 to -6.00 diopters were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 0.01 % atropine and orthokeratology (ACO, n = 39), 0.01 % atropine and single vision glasses (atropine, n = 42), orthokeratology and placebo (OK, n = 36), or placebo and single vision glasses (control, n = 37). SFChT was assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Ocular parameters, including axial length (AL), were measured using a Lenstar LS 900.ResultsSFChT significantly increased in the ACO (14.12 ± 12.88 μm, p < 0.001), OK (9.43 ± 9.14 μm, p < 0.001) and atropine (5.49 ± 9.38 μm, p < 0.001) groups, while it significantly decreased in the control group (-4.81 ± 9.93 μm, p = 0.006). The one-month change in SFChT was significantly different between the control and treatment groups (p < 0.001). The results of pairwise comparisons among the treatment groups showed that the magnitude of the SFChT change was larger in the ACO group than in the atropine group (p = 0.002). The changes in the ACO and OK groups were not significantly different (p = 0.326).ConclusionThe combination of OK and atropine induced a greater increase in SFChT than monotherapy with atropine, which might indicate a better treatment effect for childhood myopia control.     

Orthokeratology lens for management of myopia in anisometropic children: A contralateral study

PurposeTo investigate the effect of overnight orthokeratology (OK) lens wear on axial growth in anisometropic children.MethodsThe study involved 17 males and 12 females with an average age of 11.4 ± 2.9 years. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent error (SER) was −0.50D to −6.00D, and anisometropia ≥1.00D. The eyes with greater myopia were assigned to the G eye group and the fellow eyes with less myopia to the L eye group. All eyes were fitted with OK lenses. Axial length (AL) was measured at the beginning of the study and at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-up visits. Refractive error was measured at the beginning and at the 24-month visit. Linear mixed model analysis was used to evaluate the effect of time, group, and time*group on axial growth. Paired t test was used to compare the myopia increase over 24 months between the two groups.Results:The mean baseline AL was 25.06 ± 0.61 mm for the G eyes and 24.48 ± 0.61 mm for the L eyes. After 24 months, AL had increased by 0.31 ± 0.23 mm in the G eye group and by 0.41 ± 0.31 mm in the L eye group. Axial growth of the L eyes was significantly greater than that of the G eyes (p = 0.006). The mean baseline myopia of the G eye and the L eye was −3.62 ± 1.27D [−5.75D to −1.75D] and −1.93 ± 1.02D [−4.00D to −0.50D] respectively. At 24 months, the increase in myopia in the G eyes was significantly less than that in the L eyes (−0.84 ± 0.63D vs, −1.21 ± 0.89D, p < 0.001).Conclusions: In anisometropic children who wore OK lenses, axial growth was greater in the eye with less baseline myopia than in the fellow eye with greater baseline myopia after 2 years.     

Comparison of vision-related quality of life between wearing Orthokeratology lenses and spectacles in myopic children living in Kuala Lumpur

PurposeThere are limited reports available on the impact of wearing Orthokeratology (ortho-K) lenses on the quality of life of Asian children. This study evaluated and compared vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) between myopic children wearing ortho-K lenses and single-vision spectacles (SVSs), living in Kuala Lumpur, using Paediatric Refractive Error Profile (PREP) questionnaires.MethodsThis is a cross sectional study. Myopic children who had been wearing ortho-K and SVSs for 12 months were recruited, and the questionnaires were distributed online. The PREP scores were obtained using a summary scoring method. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to determine data normality. Unpaired t-test was performed for normally distributed data, and the Mann–Whitney test for non-normally distributed data. P < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsA total of 70 subjects participated in this study (45 ortho-K and 25 SVSs), with a mean age of 10.86 ± 0.73 years. The mean scores for all the items were higher in ortho-K than SVS wearers (p < 0.05). With regard to symptoms during ortho-K lens wear at night, <10 % of the subjects reported difficulty falling asleep, itch/burning/dry eyes and foreign body sensation after lens insertion.ConclusionOrtho-K improves the vision-related quality of life of myopic school children in Kuala Lumpur. Thus, it should be considered by more local optometrists when managing myopic children.     

Rehabilitation of vision disabling corneal opacities: Is there hope without corneal transplant?

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of contact lenses in visual rehabilitation of a series of patients with corneal scars/opacities.MethodRetrospective review of case records of 158 patients (n = 162 eyes) with poor vision subsequent to corneal scar/opacity, who underwent contact lens fitting, was done. Primary outcome assessed was quantum of additional improvement in vision with rigid gas permeable (RGP) or soft lenses over spectacles. Success was defined as visual improvement of ≥2 lines over that of spectacles and/or improvement of vision to ≥20/60 (LogMAR 0.48).ResultsRigid gas permeable lenses were fitted in 137 eyes and soft contact lenses in 25 eyes. Lenses were successful in improving visual acuity by two or more lines over that of spectacles in 70% eyes (113 of 162 eyes), of which RGP lens accounted for 85% (96 of 113 eyes). Alternative outcome of success was defined as attainment of reasonable functional vision of >20/60 (LogMAR 0.48). This could be achieved in 65% cases (105 of 162 eyes) of which 83% (88 eyes) were with use of RGP lenses. Almost one-fourth (23.4%) patients were children less than 15 years old. Soft contact lenses were attempted in 25 instances, where RGP lens could not be fitted and were successful in 17 (68%) of these. All these 17 patients were aphakes.ConclusionsRehabilitation of corneas with visually disabling corneal opacities is possible with usage of appropriate contact lenses even in young children.     

Changes in corneal thickness,corneal volume,and densitometry after long-term orthokeratology wear

PurposeTo investigate changes in the corneal volume, corneal densitometry and pachymetry of young myopes wearing over-night orthokeratology (OK) contact lenses.MethodsThe medical records of 28 right eyes of young myopes wearing OK between 2013 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The baseline refractive error, best corrected visual acuities at baseline and uncorrected visual acuity at the most recent visit were recorded. Corneal volume of the central 10 mm cornea; densitometry at central, nasal and temporal cornea; and pachymetry along the horizontal and vertical meridians were collected from the Pentacam® HR at baseline, after one night of lens wear, and at the latest visit.ResultsThe mean age of subjects was 12.03 ± 3.80 years at the time of OK lens fitting and wore OK overnight for a mean duration of 666 days (range 206–1736 days). The baseline spherical equivalent refractive error was ?3.03 ± 1.56 D (range ?1.00 to ?6.00 D). The corneal volume increased significantly after OK wear (p = 0.001). Corneal densitometry increased after OK wear, but the change did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.113). Pachymetry in the central cornea did not change significantly across all visits (p > 0.05) but increased significantly in the mid-peripheral regions of the cornea. Baseline refractive error was not found to be correlated with the changes in corneal volume, corneal densitometry, or pachymetry.ConclusionThe increase in corneal volume and densitometry and no significant change in the central corneal thickness may indicate the presence of corneal oedema from long-term OK wear. The baseline refraction was not correlated with the changes in corneal volume, densitometry or pachymetry.