Primary immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and antithymocyte globulin for kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal graft

BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation the beneficial immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporin (CsA) may be curtailed by its nephrotoxicity, specially in patients receiving a cadaveric allograft from suboptimal donors or at risk of delayed graft function. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have each demonstrated to be potent immunosuppressants in renal transplantation. In a prospective analysis we have studied the results at 6 months of the combination of MMF, ATG and low-dose steroids in patients with low immunological risk receiving a first cadaveric renal allograft from a suboptimal donor or at risk of delayed graft function. METHODS: Patients with preformed reactive antibodies < 500% receiving a first graft from a suboptimal donor (age > or = 40 years, non-heart-beating, acute renal failure, arterial hypertension) or at risk of delayed graft function (cold ischaemia time > or = 24 h) were eligible for this open single-arm pilot trial. From September 1996 to March 1997 we recruited 17 patients. They were treated with MMF 2 g p.o. preoperatively, and after transplantation at 3 g/day; rabbit ATG i.v. at 2 mg/kg preoperatively, and 1.5 mg/kg/day the first day after transplantation, followed by four doses of 1 mg/kg on alternate days; prednisone was given at 0.25 mg/kg/day and reduced progressively to 0.1 mg/kg/day at 3 months. Primary outcomes were incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, delayed graft function, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and the need for introduction of CsA treatment. RESULTS: delayed graft function occurred in two cases (12%). Four of 17 patients (24%) had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (2 grade I and 2 grade II) within the first 3 months after transplantation. CsA was added in two cases with grade II biopsy-proven acute rejection, and in one with grade I biopsy-proven acute rejection. In one patient MMF was replaced by CsA because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Mean serum creatinine 6 months after transplantation was 159+/-59 micromol/1. Cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease occurred in one patient (6%). At 6 months follow-up all patients are alive with functioning allografts. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that in low-immunological-risk patients who receive a suboptimal renal allograft or at risk of delayed graft function, the combination of MMF, ATG, and steroids is an efficient immunosuppressive regime that may avoid the use of CsA in 70% of the recipients.     

Administration of desmopressin in brain-dead donors and renal function in kidney recipients

BACKGROUND: Diabetes insipidus is common among brain-dead donors and may lead to decreased graft function. The use of desmopressin to limit the consequences of diabetes insipidus is controversial. We assessed the effects of desmopressin administered to brain-dead donors on early and long-term graft function in kidney recipients. METHODS: In a randomised controlled study, 97 brain-dead donors received desmopressin as 1 microg bolus every 2 h when diuresis was more than 300 mL/h (desmopressin group n=49) or no desmopressin (control group n=48). In 175 kidney recipients (controls n=89, desmopressin group n=86) we measured serum concentrations of creatinine and haemodialysis requirements to assess early renal function in the first 15 days after transplantation. We assessed long-term results of transplantation (median time 45 months) for a homogeneous subgroup of 95 recipients (48 in the desmopressin group). FINDINGS: We found no significant differences between the two groups of brain-dead donors, except for final diuresis, which was lower in the desmopressin group than among controls. Haemodialysis requirement in controls and the desmopressin group (20 vs 23%, p=0.63) and serum creatinine concentrations (decrease from 903 micromol/L to 206 micromol/L vs 814 micromol/L to 193 micromol/L, p=0.14) did not differ significantly in the first 15 days after transplantation. Long-term graft survival was similar in the two groups (88 vs 87%). INTERPRETATION: Desmopressin can be given to brain-dead donors to limit the harmful effects of diabetes insipidus without any substantial effects to graft function in recipients.     

Effect of long-term immunosuppression in kidney-graft recipients on cancer incidence: randomised comparison of two cyclosporin regimens

BACKGROUND: Long-term administration of cyclosporin carries a risk of renal toxicity, and immunosuppressants are associated with an increased rate of malignant disorders. We undertook an open randomised study of the risks and benefits of two long-term maintenance regimens of cyclosporin in kidney-allograft recipients. The primary endpoint was graft function; secondary endpoints were survival and occurrence of cancer and rejection. METHODS: 231 recipients of a first allograft with at most one previous rejection episode were randomised 1 year after transplantation. Most were receiving cyclosporin and azathioprine. One group received cyclosporin doses adjusted to yield trough blood concentrations of 75-125 ng/mL (low-dose group); the second received doses that yielded trough concentrations of 150-250 ng/mL (normal-dose group). Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: At 66 months' follow-up, the low-dose and normal-dose groups were similar in mean serum creatinine (182 [SD 160] vs 184 [157] micromol/L; p=0.9) and mean creatinine clearance (47.5 [25.1] vs 45.3 (22.5] mL/min; p=0.6). Nine of 116 patients in the low-dose group and one of 115 in the normal-dose group had symptoms of rejection (p<0.02). There was no difference between the low-dose and normal-dose groups in survival (95 vs 92%; p=0.7) or graft survival (89 vs 82%; p=0.17) at 6 years. 60 patients developed cancers, 37 in the normal-dose group and 23 in the low-dose group (p<0.034); 66% were skin cancers (26 vs 17; p<0.05). INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence that halving of trough blood cyclosporin concentrations significantly changes graft function or graft survival. The low-dose regimen was associated with fewer malignant disorders but more frequent rejection. The design of long-term maintenance protocols for transplant recipients based on powerful immunosuppressant combinations should take these potential risks into account.     

Renal transplantation following renal failure due to urological disorders

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft outcome, during an 8 year period (1985-1992), has been assessed in 56 renal transplants performed in 55 patients who had end-stage renal failure as a consequence of urological abnormalities. The abnormalities were: primary vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) or renal dysplasia (26 patients); posterior urethral valves (PUV) (15); neuropathic bladders (6); vesico-ureteric tuberculosis (5); bladder exstrophy (3); and prune belly syndrome (1). Six patients had augmented bladders, and eight transplants were performed in seven patients with urinary diversions. RESULTS: Overall, 1 and 5 year actuarial graft survival was 89 and 66%, with mean creatinine of 154 micromol/l +/- 11 (SE) and 145 +/- 9 respectively. Patients with abnormal bladders or conduits (n = 28) had worse graft function than those with normal bladders (n = 28) although graft survival was not significantly different in the two groups at 1 and 5 years: 93 and 75% with normal bladders vs 86 and 57% with abnormal systems. Symptomatic urinary tract infections were common in the first 3 months after transplantation (63%); fever and systemic symptoms occurred in 39% with normal bladders and 59% with abnormal bladders. Urinary tract infection directly contributed to graft loss in six patients with abnormal bladders, but had no consequences in those with normal bladders. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal bladders must be assessed urodynamically before transplantation, and after transplantation adequacy of urinary drainage must be re-assessed frequently. Prophylactic antibiotics are now given for the first 6 months and urinary tract infections must be treated promptly. With these measures, good results, similar to those of patients without urological problems, can be obtained.     

Treatment of end-stage renal failure after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND: Five to 10% of heart-transplant recipients develop end-stage renal failure (ESRF). Little is known about the outcome of these patients under renal replacement therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in 16 men (mean age 52.8+/-7.4 years at heart transplantation) who developed ESRF 5.3+/-2.1 years later. Results. Haemodialysis (HD) was the first-line treatment (mean Kt/V 1.35+/-0.4). Vascular access was unsuccessful in six patients (37.5%) due to peripheral arteriopathy and they were treated with tunnelled catheters for an average 15 months without bacterial infection. Mean weight was 68.4+/-10 kg at onset of HD and 61.7+/-9 kg one month later. Despite this reduction in extracellular overload, one antihypertensive drug was required in 75% of patients and two drugs in 12.5%. One patient tolerated automated peritoneal dialysis (PD) for 16 months (weekly Kt/V 2.1) despite persistent anuria. Renal transplantation (RT) was contraindicated in eight patients because of aortoiliac arteriopathy (n=5), poor general status (n=2), or ischaemic heart disease (n=1). RT was performed in eight patients with no acute episode of heart or renal graft rejection. There were no serious infectious complications. Three months after RT, mean serum creatinine was 115 micromol/l. One patient developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder 3.5 months after RT and was successfully treated with transplant nephrectomy. Sudden death occurred in two patients 18 and 33 months after RT. Overall patient survival was 100, 78, and 59%, 1, 2 and 3 years after HD onset respectively. Using a time-dependent variable, the Cox model analysis demonstrated that heart-transplant recipients with ESRF have a relative risk of death 3.2 times higher than those without ESRF (95% CI = 1.3-7.8). CONCLUSIONS: HD, PD, and RT can be useful for the treatment of ESRF after heart transplantation. After initiating HD, patient survival is nearly the same as that reported in patients in Europe undergoing HD for other causes. But ESRF seems to reduce life expectancy in heart-transplant recipients.     

Risk factors for delayed graft function in cadaveric kidney transplantation: a prospective study of renal function and graft survival after preservation with University of Wisconsin solution in multi-organ donors. European Multicenter Study Group

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) remains an important complication in renal transplantation. In this multicenter study, we investigated the influence of donor and recipient factors on the occurrence of DGF and DGF's effect on long-term graft survival. METHODS: A total of 547 transplanted kidney allografts, retrieved from multi-organ donors, were analyzed, and results were compared with literature on kidney-only donors. RESULTS: Median follow-up of patients without graft failure was 3.4 years. Twenty-four percent of the recipients developed DGF. In univariate analysis, the following factors significantly increased the incidence of DGF: (a) among the donor factors, mean creatinine level >120 micromol/L and prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT); and (b) among the recipient factors, previous transplant(s), no intraoperative use of mannitol, poor quality of reperfusion, absence of intraoperative diuresis, and pretransplant anuria or oliguria. After stepwise logistic regression, donor age, CIT, recipient's number of previous transplants, and intraoperative diuresis proved to be of independent prognostic value for the occurrence of DGF. Overall graft survival was 91%, 87%, and 72% at 3 months, 1 year, and 4 years after transplantation, respectively. In case of DGF, graft survival was approximately 10% lower when compared with cases with immediate graft function (P<0.001). No difference in incidence of DGF was found between grafts of multi-organ donors and kidney-only donors. CONCLUSIONS: DGF results in an approximately 10% higher rate of graft failure. DGF incidence can be reduced by the administration of mannitol during transplantation, which minimizes CIT and optimizes donor management. Grafts from multi-organ donors and kidney-only donors appear to be of equal quality.     

Low-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with suboptimal renal function

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity can be identified by functional changes and chronic renal damage. CsA-associated renal fibrosis has been related to the overproduction of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1, a fibrogenic cytokine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may allow CsA dose reduction without increasing the risk of rejection. METHODS: We studied the impact of CsA dose reduction in association with MMF on renal function and TGF-beta1, production in 16 long-term renal allograft recipients with suspected CsA nephrotoxicity. Two grams/day of MMF were introduced, and CsA dose was reduced to reach whole-blood levels between 40 and 60 ng/ml within 1 month. CsA dose and levels, renal function parameters, and platelet-poor plasma TGF-beta1 levels were evaluated before and 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: MMF allowed a decrease in both the mean dose of CsA (3.8+/-1.35 vs. 2.2+/-0.73 mg/kg/day; P<0.01) and CsA levels (148+/-36 vs. 53+/-19 ng/ml; P<0.001). The reduction of CsA was associated with a decrement of serum creatinine levels (210+/-46 vs. 172+/-41 micromol/L; P<0.001) and an increase in both the glomerular filtration rate (32.9+/-12 vs. 39.1+/-14 ml/min/1.73 m2; P<0.02) and renal plasma flow (195+/-79 to 218.6+/-74.02 ml/min/1.73 m2; P<0.02). There was a reduction in plasma TGF-beta1 levels (4.6+/-4.2 vs. 2.0+/-1.4 ng/ml; P=0.003) and CsA levels correlated with TGF-beta1 (r=0.536, P=0.002). No rejection episodes occurred, and an improvement in both systolic (149+/-13 vs. 137+/-12 mmHg; P<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (89+/-14 vs. 83+/-10 mmHg; P<0.04) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These short-term results show that MMF introduction allows a CsA dose reduction, which improves renal function, reduces TGF-beta1 production, and improves the control of hypertension, without increasing the incidence of acute rejection.     

Prednisone withdrawal 14 days after liver transplantation with mycophenolate: a prospective trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: The long-term complications of immunosuppressive therapy such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension are a major source of morbidity in liver transplant recipients. In this prospective, randomized, open-label study we completely withdrew prednisone (PRED) 14 days after liver transplantation in an effort to decrease these metabolic complications. Patients were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with either cyclosporine (CsA; Neoral formulation) or tacrolimus (TAC). Thus, we also were able to compare CsA to TAC in patients not receiving PRED with respect to efficacy, toxicity, and effect on posttransplant metabolic complications. METHODS: A total of 71 patients were randomized to receive either TAC-MMF (n=35) or CsA-MMF (n=36) after liver transplantation and were analyzed for patient and graft survival. Fifty-eight patients continued the immunosuppressive protocol for at least 6 months after transplantation and were analyzed for the incidence of acute rejection and the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. RESULTS: The 6-month patient survival rates were 94.4% for CsA-MMF and 88.6% for TAC-MMF. Corresponding 6-month graft survival rates were 88.7% and 85.71% with no immunologic graft losses in either group. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 46% for CsA-MMF and 42.3% for TAC-MMF. Six patients were converted from CsA to TAC (four for recurrent rejection) and seven patients were converted from TAC to CsA (four for neurotoxicity). Only one patient (in the TAC-MMF group) developed new-onset posttransplant diabetes. In contrast, four of eight patients in the CsA-MMF group who were diabetic before transplant became nondiabetic in the first 3 months after transplant. The mean serum cholesterol level was significantly lower in the TAC-MMF group than in the CsA-MMF group (145.2+/-41.8 mg/dl and 190.3+/-62.2, respectively; P<0.001) and the incidence of hypertension was lower in the TAC-MMF group (12% vs. 30.3% in the CsA-MMF group, P<0.01). Both groups had a lower incidence of metabolic complications compared with a historical group (n=100) maintained on CsA and PRED (10 mg/day at 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: MMF in combination with either TAC or CsA allows withdrawal of PRED 14 days after liver transplantation with a moderate rejection rate and no immunologic graft losses. Early PRED withdrawal decreases posttransplant diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, but patients maintained on TAC have lower serum cholesterol levels and a lower incidence of hypertension than CsA-treated patients.     

Steroid-free immunosuppression after kidney transplantation with antithymocyte globulin induction and cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil maintenance therapy

BACKGROUND: Our goal in clinical renal transplantation is to find immunosuppressive procedures that not only promote long-term patient and graft survival but also improve the overall well-being of the patients. METHODS: In a retrospective consecutive clinical study with historical controls, 68 patients were discharged from our center with functioning grafts between September 1995 and December 1997. Patients received steroid-free immunosuppression using an initial 10-day antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance therapy with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). No steroids were given. RESULTS: After an observation for up to 2.5 years (median 488 days, range 127 to 945 days), 66 patients (one died from sepsis after 6 months, and one died of peritonitis after returning to dialysis) were alive and well. Sixty-four grafts were functioning well, hemolytic uremic syndrome recurred in one graft, one graft had to be removed for noncompliance, and two patients returned to dialysis after chronic rejection-one after 8 months (the patient who died in peritoneal dialysis) and one (a third graft in an antibody-positive patient) 16 months after transplantation. We observed only 10 acute rejections (15%), a rate significantly lower (P=0.0006) than the 71 acute rejections observed in 190 previous consecutive transplants (37.4%) treated without MMF but otherwise after exactly the same protocol. In further comparison, the MMF-treated group also showed an equivalent (P=NS) rate of cytomegalovirus infections and a lower rate (P<0.00005) of Epstein-Barr virus infections. Graft function was excellent (median serum creatinine below 200 micromol/L at 1 year), and no malignancies were observed in the MMF-treated patients. Side effects were mainly leukopenia and two gastrointestinal disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Our first-line, steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol allows initial graft function, provides a safe level of long-term graft survival and function with a very low rejection rate, gives an acceptable rate of side effects, and possesses the potential for lowering the incidence of chronic rejection over the long-term. Compared with protocols that discontinue steroids after the initial posttransplant period, a steroid-free protocol avoids the increased risk of infection and body disfigurement in the early posttransplant period. It also avoids the long-term risks of steroid use and the increased risks of rejection when the steroids are withdrawn.     

Prevalence of asthma and wheeze in primary school children in northern Jordan

While the existence of chimeric cells in host tissue following organ transplantation is well documented, its distribution, temporal evolution and relationship to allograft survival is less clear. To explore this phenomenon, Lewis recipients of ACI cardiac allografts representing a wide range of immunosuppressive protocols and graft survival times were examined for the presence of chimerism using a sensitive polymerase chain reaction assay. Four groups of animals were examined: untransplanted animals receiving donor specific transfusion (DST)/cyclosporine A (CsA); allograft recipients with no treatment; recipients treated with DST/CsA/supplementary immunosuppression with rejection at 21-183 days; and recipients sacrificed with functioning allografts, treated with DST/CsA/supplementary immunosuppression and surviving > 200 days. To elucidate variations in the tissue distribution of chimeric cells, bone marrow, skin, liver, spleen, and thymus were examined in each animal. Untransplanted animals receiving DST/CsA displayed no evidence of chimerism. In animals receiving a cardiac allograft but no treatment, there was extensive evidence of chimerism in four of five animals. Chimerism was also detected in seven of nine animals with intermediate graft survival at the time of rejection. In animals with long-term graft survival, only four of eight displayed chimerism. These results suggest that, without immunosuppression, early chimerism does not lead to prolonged graft survival and that, even when graft survival is moderately prolonged, these cells are not sufficient to prevent rejection. In conclusion, chimerism appears to be a common phenomenon following transplantation, is not a result of DST, and may not be necessary for maintenance of long-term graft survival.     

The pharmacokinetics and steady state pharmacodynamics of mivacurium in children

BACKGROUND: The main causes of allograft failure after cardiac transplantation are primary graft dysfunction, intractable acute rejection, and coronary graft disease. Despite the important progress in the last several years in graft preservation, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and treatment of coronary graft disease, retransplantation in selected cases is the only way to achieve long-term recipient survival. METHODS: We compare here in a case-control study 24 retransplantations with 47 first transplants in patients matched for date of transplantation. RESULTS: Between 1973 and 1996, 1,063 patients underwent cardiac transplantation in our institution. In this cohort, 22 patients had a total of 24 retransplantations (2 second-time retransplantations). The causes of retransplantations were primary graft failure (n=4), acute rejection (n=7), coronary graft disease (n=11), and miscellaneous (n=2). Survival at 1 and 5 years of patients with retransplantations is 45.5% and 31.2%, and survival of control patients is 59.4% and 38.8% (p=0.07). An interval between first transplantation and retransplantation shorter (n=11) or longer (n=13) than 1 year is associated with a 1-year survival of 27.3% and 61.5% and a 4-year survival of 27.3% and 46%, respectively (not significant). Intervals shorter than 1 year between first transplantation and retransplantation were exclusively secondary to primary graft failure or intractable acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In the face of lack of donor grafts, these and other data indicate that retransplantation should be considered cautiously, especially when the interval between the first transplantation and retransplantation is short.     

Delayed function reduces renal allograft survival independent of acute rejection

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms by which delayed allograft function reduces renal allograft survival are poorly understood. This study evaluated the relationship of delayed allograft function to acute rejection and long-term survival of cadaveric allografts. METHODS: 338 recipients of cadaveric allografts were followed until death, resumption of dialysis, retransplantation, loss to follow-up, or the study's end, which ever came first. Delayed allograft function was defined by dialysis during the first week following transplantation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards survival analysis was used to assess the relationship of delayed allograft function to rejection and allograft survival. RESULTS: Delayed allograft function, recipient age, preformed reactive antibody levels, prior kidney transplantation, recipient race, rejection during the first 30 days and rejection subsequent to 30 days following transplantation were predictive of allograft survival in multivariate survival models. Delayed allograft function was associated with shorter allograft survival after adjustment for acute rejection and other covariates (relative rate of failure [RR]+1.72 [95% CI, 1.07, 2.76]). The adjusted RR of allograft failure associated with any rejection during the first 30 days was 1.99 (1.23, 3.21), and for rejection subsequent to the first 30 days was 3.53 (2.9 08, 6.00). The impact of delayed allograft function did not change substantially (RR=1.84 [1.15, 2.95]) in models not controlling for acute rejection. These results were stable among several subgroups of patients and using alternative definitions of allograft survival and delayed allograft function. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that delayed allograft function and acute allograft rejection have important independent and deleterious effects on cadaveric allograft survival. These results suggest that the effect of delayed allograft function is mediated, in part, through mechanisms not involving acute clinical rejection.     

Postoperative pain relief following laparoscopic tubal sterilization with silastic bands

The value of urine flow cytometry (UFC) in diagnosing acute renal allograft rejection (AR) was recently established in a prospective double-blind study. In this study, we report the 1-year follow-up of three groups of patients identified during the previous study: group 1--stable patients (no ARs) with persistently negative UFCs (n=7); group II--patients who had early ARs (<3 months after transplantation), with positive UFCs that completely normalized with antirejection therapy (n=8); group III--stable patients (no ARs) with positive UFCs (n=7). By definition, group III consists of patients previously considered to have "false positive" UFCs. All patients received standard immunosuppressive therapy, with regimens that included cyclosporine at doses adjusted to maintain target levels. Serum creatinine (SCr) levels (mg/dl) were similar in all three groups at 1 month after transplantation. However, at 1 year after transplantation, SCr was 1.4 +/- 0.2 in group I, 2.0 +/- 0.9 in group II, and 1.9 +/- 0.3 in group III (P=0.004 group I vs. group III). There were no ARs clinically diagnosed during this follow-up period in any of the three groups of patients, but there were significantly higher SCr increments among group III patients after the 1 year of follow-up. The detection of an active urine sediment by flow cytometry in "clinically stable" allograft recipients may indicate ongoing, subclinical acute rejection activity, which in this study was found to be associated with worse renal function at the end of the first posttransplant year as compared with patients with persistently negative UFCs. Increased immunosuppression may be indicated for these patients with persistently positive UFCs.     

Deleterious effects of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplant recipients independent of acute rejection

BACKGROUND: In cadaveric renal transplantation, delayed graft function (DGF) correlates with poor long-term graft survival; however, whether its effects are independent of acute rejection is controversial. We wished to study the effect of DGF on graft survival, controlling for acute rejection, discharge creatinine, and human leukocyte antigen match. METHODS: We analyzed 27,096 first cadaveric donor renal transplants reported to the UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry between January 1994 and November 1997. DGF was defined as dialysis need in the first week. Acute rejection was recorded for initial hospitalization and within 6 months. Kaplan Meier survival curves were analyzed with the log rank test. RESULTS: DGF increased the incidence of acute rejection before discharge (8% without DGF; 25% with DGF, P<0.01) and any acute rejections by 6 months (25% without DGF, 42% with DGF, P<0.01). Without early rejection, DGF reduced 1-year graft survival from 91 to 75% (P<0.0001) and graft half-life from 12.9 to 8.0 years. In kidneys with acute rejection within 6 months, DGF decreased 3-year graft survival from 77 to 60% and graft half-life from 9.4 to 6.2 years (P<0.001). With a discharge creatinine of less than 2.5 mg/dl, the difference in graft half-life between no DGF and no rejection (13.4 years) and DGF with rejection (9.8 years) was significant (P<0.001). Increased donor age and cold ischemia time additionally decreased graft survival, whereas a good human leukocyte antigen match could not overcome the deleterious effects of DGF or acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: DGF is an important independent predictor of poor graft survival. Newer immunosuppressive strategies must minimize nonimmune and immune renal injury if long-term graft survival is to improve.     

Physician and patient factors influencing the treatment of low back pain

From January 1989 to December 1995, 5 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (1 woman, 4 men) underwent kidney-alone transplantation. The mean age of the recipients at the time of transplantation was 37.4 years (range, 32 to 43). Craft function and glucose tolerance was evaluated for 5 to 72 months after surgery. Postoperative complications were seen in 2 patients; nonspecific subcutaneous infections and an asymptomatic partial allograft infarction. All renal allografts were functioning 1 year after transplantation, with a mean serum creatinine level of 1.10 mg/dL (range, 0.8 to 1.8 mg/dL), and a mean urinary protein level of 17.8 mg/dL (range, 5 to 27 mg/dL). The postoperative daily dose of insulin was higher than the preoperative dose, while the level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) increased after surgery and peaked 6 months after transplantation; 1 year after transplantation it had reverted to the preoperative level. As long as the diabetic complications of the renal allograft recipients are not severe, the short-term survival and the renal function of diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease improves after kidney-alone transplantation, which is still the standard method of treatment in Japan.     

Primate renal transplants using immunotoxin

BACKGROUND: T-lymphocyte depletion 7 days before transplantation with immunotoxin FN 18-CRM9 has resulted in tolerance to subsequent renal allografts. We tested the effect of giving immunotoxin on the day of the transplantation and evaluated its effect on rhesus monkey and allograft survival, on antibody production, and on T-cell recovery. METHODS: Major histocompatibility complex mismatched renal allografts were performed in rhesus monkeys. Immunotoxin was given starting on the day of transplantation, with and without prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil for 3 days. T-cell subsets and alloantibody levels were measured by flow cytometry. The ability of treated monkeys to develop antibody to tetanus, diphtheria, and xenoantibody was measured. Histology of renal transplants was read in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Immunotoxin started on the day of transplantation resulted in prolonged allograft survival in all treatment groups. Graft loss between days 50 and 135 was most often due to interstitial nephritis. Later graft loss was due to chronic rejection. Monkeys had intact antibody responses to alloantigen, tetanus, diphtheria, and xenoantibody. Their CD4 cells recovered gradually over 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Immunotoxin reliably prolongs renal allograft survival when started on the day of transplantation, but interstitial nephritis and chronic rejection limit the development of long-term tolerance. T-cell-dependent B-cell responses remain intact after treatment.     

Long-term improvement in renal function after cyclosporine reduction in renal transplant recipients with histologically proven chronic cyclosporine nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Chronic cyclosporine (CsA) nephropathy, which has been unequivocally documented in recipients of heart, heart-lung, liver, or bone marrow transplants, as well as in nontransplant situations, usually results in a progressive deterioration of renal function. In this study, we assessed the potential reversibility of chronic CsA nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three renal transplant patients with biopsy-proven CsA nephropathy associated with long-term CsA administration (27+/-4 months) were followed up for more than 2 years after CsA reduction (18/23 patients) or withdrawal (5/23 patients) and addition of azathioprine. Changes in effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate were assessed before and 2 years after CsA reduction, whereas serum creatinine, proteinuria, blood pressure, and CsA concentrations were monitored up to 5 years. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, glomerular filtration rate increased from 40+/-3 to 47+/-4 (P<0.05) and effective renal plasma flow from 217+/-23 to 244+/-24 ml/min/1.73 m2 (NS). Mean arterial pressure significantly decreased from 98.7+/-2.9 to 93.1+/-2.7 mmHg (P<0.05). There was no significant change in renal vascular resistance, filtration fraction, or albumin excretion. A significant decrease in serum creatinine was also observed during the whole follow-up (73+/-6.5 months). CsA reduction was followed by only one episode of acute reversible rejection; chronic rejection developed in three patients 2 years or later after CsA reduction. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that CsA nephropathy participates in graft dysfunction in a small group of renal transplant recipients. In addition, graft dysfunction may be reversible when CsA dosage is reduced early after diagnosis of chronic CsA nephropathy.     

Prophylaxis of acute renal allograft rejection using FTY720 in combination with subtherapeutic doses of cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: In rodent transplant models, FTY720 exerts a synergistic affect with cyclosporine (CsA) to prolong allograft survival. The present experiments sought to test this combination in subhuman primates. METHODS: Cynomolgus monkeys were transplanted with kidney allografts that were incompatible in mixed lymphocyte culture reactions. The animals were treated with daily intramuscular injections of CsA using doses selected to maintain whole blood trough concentrations at therapeutic values between 40 and 200 ng/ml. The 4 experimental groups included CsA without or with 0.1, 0.3, or 1 mg/kg/day FTY720 delivered daily by intravenous bolus injection. Therapeutic effects were suggested both by the graft histology of biopsy within the first 10 posttransplant days and by the length of host survival. RESULTS: Whereas recipients treated with CsA alone rejected kidney allografts at a median survival time of 8.5 days (n=4), those treated with either 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg/day FTY720 in addition to CsA showed significant prolongation of kidney allograft survival to 71 days (n=3; P<0.04) or 63 days (n=5; P<0.05), respectively. The hosts in the 1.0 mg/kg/day FTY720 group survived 48 days, with 2 of 5 recipients succumbing at 9 or 17 days postgraft, suggesting possible complications caused by overimmunosuppression. Biopsies of the 0.1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group on posttransplant day 7 documented mild to moderate rejection (grade I), indicated by multiple focal areas of tubular destruction. The histology results of transplants in the 0.3 or 1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group showed only minimal interstitial inflammatory infiltrates (borderline grade), with no evidence of tubular or arterial damage. Serum creatinine values among the animals in the 0.1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group showed increases in 2 of 3 recipients by day 20 and in the third by day 41 postgraft. Among the 0.3 mg/kg/day FTY720 group, 3 of 5 recipients maintained baseline creatinine values to 45 days postgraft; 1 recipient had stable kidney function for 120 days postgraft. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of FTY720 therapy to a subtherapeutic CsA immunosuppressive regimen delays the rejection of renal allografts in subhuman primates.     

Inhibitory effect of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii on coronary arteriosclerosis after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND: Graft coronary arteriosclerosis (GCA) is the major limiting factor for long-term survival after heart transplantation. In this study, we investigated the effect of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii (MT) on GCA and platelet-derived growth factor A (PDGF-A) mRNA expression of transplanted hearts. METHODS: Two groups of Lewis rats (n=7/group) underwent heterotopic heart transplantation from Wistar-King donors and were treated with either cyclosporine (CsA;10 mg/kg/day) or MT (30 mg/kg/ day). Histological evaluations of rejection and coronary arteriosclerosis, as well as Northern blot analysis on graft PDGF-A mRNA expression were made 60 days after transplantation. RESULTS: Morphometric results indicated no significant difference in rejection between the CsA- and MT-treated groups. However, the extent of GCA in the MT-treated group was significantly less than that seen in the CsA-treated group (P<0.01). The expression of PDGF-A mRNA of cardiac allograft was also significantly suppressed in the MT-treated group when compared with the CsA-treated group (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: MT is superior to CsA in preventing graft coronary arteriosclerosis, and this efficacy is probably associated with the depressed expression of graft PDGF-A mRNA in the MT-treated group.     

Acute intracranial complications of temporal bone trauma

BACKGROUND: A total of 110 patients, in whom kidneys from 95 living related and 15 cadaver donor, had experienced renal transplantation between February 1985 and October 1996 in our clinic. This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of the various pre-operative factors to the graft survivals and clinical course of patients in living related renal transplantation. METHODS: In 95 recipients, 17 adult patients had long term graft survivals over 5 years including 6 recurrent or denovo nephritis without chronic allografts nephropathy. Eight failed to graft loss attributed to chronic allografts nephropathy diagnosed within 5 years. Retrospective analysis were performed to elucidate the differences of these recipients. RESULTS: Donors of long graft survival recipients were younger (49.1 +/- 12.1 v.s. 58.9 +/- 10. 2) and had a better renal function evaluated by preoperative creatinine clearance in living related donors (115.5 +/- 37.0 v.s. 79.7 +/- 22.0 1/day). Graft long survival recipients had experienced less frequencies of acute rejection within 6 months (0.53 +/- 0.62: 8 patients, 9 times) compared with chronic allografts nephropathy recipients (1.00 +/- 0.53: 7 patients, 8 times). Long graft survival recipients had better responses to the antirejection therapy. Additionally acute rejection over 6 months were experienced only in chronic allografts nephropathy recipients. Higher serum creatinine level was revealed in recipients with chronic allografts nephropathy at 1 year after transplantation (1.27 +/- 0.27 v.s. 1.88 +/- 0.42 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that donor age and renal function are related to the graft long survival as background factors. Long graft survival recipients had less frequency of acute rejection and good response to the antirejection therapy. In recipients with of acute rejection and good response to the antirejection therapy. In recipients with chronic allografts nephropathy, serum cretine level had already increased gradually within 1 year.