Time trend of female breast carcinoma in situ by race and histology in Connecticut, USA

BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures used to remove genital warts (cryotherapy, electrodesiccation) are painful. Attempts to reduce the discomfort of surgery by prior lidocaine infiltration anesthesia are compromised by the pain of the infiltration. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of topically applied lidocaine/prilocaine cream to reduce the pain of lidocaine infiltration and the pain associated with cryotherapy to remove genital warts. METHODS: Men, scheduled for removal of genital warts by cryotherapy, were randomly selected to receive one of three treatments: (1) lidocaine/prilocaine cream application, (2) 1% lidocaine infiltration, and (3) lidocaine/prilocaine cream application followed by infiltration of 1% lidocaine. RESULTS: Application of lidocaine/prilocaine cream for 15 minutes markedly reduced the pain of lidocaine infiltration. The combination of lidocaine/prilocaine cream followed by infiltration of 1% lidocaine gave greater pain relief from the cryotherapy than did either anesthetic alone. CONCLUSION: The application of lidocaine/prilocaine cream as an adjunct to lidocaine infiltration reduced the pain of infiltration and the pain associated with cryotherapy for the removal of genital warts.     

Femoral and genitofemoral nerve blocks versus spinal anesthesia for outpatients undergoing long saphenous vein stripping surgery

Long saphenous vein stripping (LSVS) surgery is often used to treat varicose veins. We tested the hypothesis that femoral nerve block (FNB) with genitofemoral nerve infiltration provides sufficient analgesia and superior recovery characteristics to spinal anesthesia for LSVS procedures in the ambulatory setting. Thirty-six patients were randomized to receive FNB with 30 mL of 3% alkalinized chloroprocaine, and 32 patients received spinal anesthesia with 65 mg of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine. Data collected included patient demographics, time required for induction of and recovery from anesthesia, postoperative anesthesia complications, and patient report of pain severity after the operation. During a follow-up call, a blinded observer noted the onset of any complications, the requirement for analgesics, and the patients' satisfaction with the anesthetic technique. Patients in the FNB group had significantly faster recovery (P < 0.01) and lower incidences of pain (P < 0.05) and complications (P < 0.05) than the patients in the spinal group. All patients who received FNB indicated that they would choose this type of anesthesia in the future, whereas five (15%) patients in the spinal group would refuse spinal anesthesia in the future (P < 0.01). We conclude that FNB is an excellent anesthetic choice for LSVS.     

Should interstitial thermometry be used for deep hyperthermia?

This study was performed to determine whether premedication with midazolam and fentanyl prevents reliable detection of an i.v. lidocaine test dose. Thirty ASA physical status I or II patients received either 3 mL of saline or 1.5 mg of midazolam (1.5 mL) plus 75 microg of fentanyl (1.5 mL) i.v. in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Five minutes later, lidocaine 1 mg/kg was injected i.v. At 1.5 min before and every minute after lidocaine administration, each subject was questioned regarding the presence of four symptoms of systemic lidocaine toxicity. Any new tinnitus, perioral numbness, metallic taste, or light-headedness within 5 min after lidocaine administration was considered a positive response. All 15 patients in the saline group (100% sensitivity) had a positive response to i.v. lidocaine, but only 9 of 15 patients in the sedation group had a positive response (60% sensitivity; P = 0.017). We conclude that midazolam and fentanyl premedication decreases the reliability of subjective detection of i.v. lidocaine. Implications: Anesthesiologists often rely on subjective symptoms to prevent local anesthetic toxicity while performing regional anesthesia. Sedatives are often administered during the administration of regional anesthesia. This study demonstrates that typical sedation decreases the reliability of detection of local anesthetic toxicity by subjective symptoms.     

The local addition of tenoxicam reduces the incidence of low back pain after lumbar epidural anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Postepidural backache is a common postoperative complaint after lumbar epidural anesthesia. Useful interventions to decrease the incidence of postepidural backache would be helpful. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the effect of local addition of tenoxicam on the incidence of postepidural backache after nonobstetric surgery. One thousand unpremedicated ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy were assigned randomly to tenoxicam or control groups. Patients in the control group received 25 ml lidocaine, 2%, with epinephrine 1:200,000 epidurally and 4 ml lidocaine, 1%, for local skin infiltration. Patients in the tenoxicam group received 25 ml lidocaine, 2%, with epinephrine 1:200,000 epidurally and 4 ml lidocaine, 1%, with tenoxicam (2 mg) 1:2,000 for local skin infiltration. Patients were interviewed at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using a standard visual analog scale for evaluation of postepidural backache. A patient was considered to have postepidural backache when the postoperative visual analog scale score was higher than the preoperative score. RESULTS: The incidence of postepidural backache in patients in the control group for the 3 days were 22.8%, 17.4%, and 9.2%, all of which were significantly more frequent than observed in the patients in the tenoxicam group (6.8%, 4.0%, and 1.2%, P < 0.01). There was a significant association between backache and multiple attempts at epidural needle insertion. CONCLUSION: In summary, the local addition of tenoxicam reduced the incidence and severity of postepidural backache.     

Cocaine, lidocaine, tetracaine: which is best for topical nasal anesthesia?

The quality of nasal anesthesia obtained with three local anesthetic solutions (4% cocaine, 2% lidocaine in oxymetazoline, and 1% tetracaine in oxymetazoline) was evaluated in a randomized study. Each local anesthetic mixture was applied to the nasal septum of healthy volunteers using medication-soaked pledgets. Measurements of anesthetic effect (sensation threshold and pain perception) were made with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Measurements were performed prior to local anesthetic application and 10 and 70 min after local anesthetic application. Subjects had greater increases in sensation threshold with tetracaine than with lidocaine or cocaine at both 10 and 70 min (P < 0.05). Subjects had greater decreases in pain perception with tetracaine than with lidocaine or cocaine at both time intervals (P < 0.05). Tetracaine mixed with oxymetazoline appears to be a superior topical anesthetic for nasal procedures.     

Comparison of iontophoresis of lidocaine with a eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) for topically administered local anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Almost all dermatologic surgery is accomplished using local anesthesia. To make our patients more comfortable, there is a constant search for less painful methods of administering anesthetic agents. Topical EMLA as well as iontophoresis are both useful in this regard. OBJECTIVE: In this study we compared topical EMLA with lidocaine delivered by iontophoresis in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Our goal was to assess the degree of anesthesia obtained as well as the relative rapidity of onset. METHODS: A double-blind controlled study was performed on 10 healthy volunteers between 26 and 37 years of age. Three test sites were placed on each forearm. EMLA or a moisturizer control was placed on two of the three test sites on each arm. Each site was wiped free of cream and tested for sensitivity to pinprick 30 and 60 minutes after cream placement. One iontophoretic unit was placed on each forearm. Both units were saturated with anesthesia with the control unit being turned off. Sensitivity to pinprick was evaluated at the iontophoretic sites and one of the EMLA sites 30 minutes after site placement on the subject. The additional EMLA-treated site was tested in the same manner 60 minutes after placement. RESULTS: Both EMLA cream and the iontophoretic unit delivered topical anesthesia greater than the control. Significantly more anesthesia was acquired 1 hour after application of EMLA than was seen 30 minutes earlier. The iontophoretic patch-treated area provided greater anesthesia than the EMLA-treated sites evaluated 30 and 60 minutes after placement. Both modalities provided significant anesthesia when left in place for 60 minutes. CONCLUSION: Both iontophoresis of lidocaine and topical EMLA delivered significant, and sometimes complete, local anesthesia. A greater degree of anesthesia is delivered via iontophoresis after 30 minutes as compared with EMLA left on the skin for 30 or 60 minutes. Both modalities have important and unique advantages and disadvantages. Topical EMLA and iontophoretically delivered lidocaine are both valuable tools for the dermatologic surgeon.     

The peripheral effect of fentanyl on postoperative pain

The clinical value of the analgesic effect of opioids administered peripherally (except for intraarticular administration) has not been clearly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that fentanyl, added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration, can enhance postoperative analgesia via a peripheral mechanism. Patients with inguinal herniorrhaphy performed under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups (n = 10 each). At the end of surgery, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL of lidocaine 0.5% and fentanyl 0.001% (10 microg) in one group; in the other group, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL of lidocaine 0.5% alone (and fentanyl 10 microg IM contralaterally). The following variables were determined in a double-blind manner: the duration of anesthesia (response to a von Frey filament), the duration of analgesia (time to mild postoperative pain), postoperative meperidine consumption, intensity visual analog scale of spontaneous and movement-associated pain 24 h after surgery, and wound pain threshold 24 h after surgery (pressure algometry). The addition of fentanyl for wound infiltration enhanced the duration of anesthesia (130+/-37 vs 197+/-27 min; P < 0.001) and decreased the intensity of spontaneous (50+/-17 vs 19+/-18 mm; P < 0.002) and movement-associated (56+/-15 vs 26+/-21 mm; P < 0.002) pain 24 h postoperatively. Differences between groups for other variables were not statistically significant. Fentanyl added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration after spinal anesthesia can enhance postoperative analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. IMPLICATIONS: Fentanyl can enhance analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. Added to a local anesthetic for wound infiltration, it may be of benefit for the relief of postoperative pain.     

Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in irreversible pulpitis

The purpose of this study was to determine the anesthetic efficacy of a supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. Fifty-one patients with symptomatic, vital maxillary, and mandibular posterior teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis received conventional infiltrations or inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Pulp testing was used to determine pulpal anesthesia after "clinically successful" injections. Patients who were positive to the pulp tests, or were negative to the pulp tests but felt pain during endodontic access, received an intraosseous injection using 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The results demonstrated that 42% of the patients who tested negative to the pulp tests reported pain during treatment and required supplemental anesthesia. Eighty-one percent of the mandibular teeth and 12% of maxillary teeth required an intraosseous injection due to failure to gain pulpal anesthesia. Overall, the Stabident intraosseous injection was found to be 88% successful in gaining total pulpal anesthesia for endodontic therapy. We concluded that, for posterior teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis, the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) was successful when conventional techniques failed.     

Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of buffered lidocaine infiltration. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted involving adults with lacerations being repaired following local anesthesia. Two 0.5-mL injections of buffered lidocaine were given in a standardized manner. Injection 1 was given prior to application of topical study solution. Injection 2 was given on the opposite side of the laceration after topical application of a study solution that was 4 mL of either tetracaine or normal saline. Pain of each infiltration was measured using a visual analog pain scale. Pain score differences (injection 1 - injection 2) were compared for the 2 study solutions using a Wilcoxon 2-sample signed-rank test. RESULTS: Of 57 subjects studied, 29 received tetracaine and 28 received saline. The groups were similar in age, gender, wound length, wound location, and initial pain score. Pain scores decreased significantly in the tetracaine group as compared with the saline group. The median pain score difference for tetracaine was 12.0 mm, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 2 to 43 mm, as compared with 2 mm, with an IQR of - 17 to 21 mm for saline (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Topical tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered lidocaine.     

Comparison of lidocaine and saline for epidural top-up during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in volunteers

This study was designed to determine the efficacy of saline as an epidural top-up to prolong spinal anesthesia during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). Eight volunteers received three separate CSEAs with intrathecal lidocaine (50 mg). After two-segment regression, each subject received either a saline (10 mL), lidocaine 1.5% (10 mL), or control sham (0.5 mL saline) epidural injection in a randomized, double-blind, triple cross-over fashion. Sensory block was assessed by pinprick and tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent to surgical stimulation at the knee and ankle. Motor strength was assessed with iso-metric force dynamometry. Data were analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance and a paired t-test. Sensory block to pinprick was prolonged in the thoracolumbar dermatomes only by lidocaine (P < 0.05). Neither lidocaine nor saline prolonged the duration of tolerance to TES at the tested sites. Instead, saline decreased the duration of tolerance to TES by 20 and 24 min at the knee and ankle (P < 0.05). Recovery from motor block at the quadriceps was prolonged by an epidural injection of lidocaine (P < 0.05). We conclude that when 10 mL of epidural saline is administered after two-segment regression, it is an ineffective top-up and may decrease the duration of spinal anesthesia during CSEA.     

The effects of general versus epidural anesthesia for outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Although many anesthetic techniques are described for immersion extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), regional and i.v. techniques are the most commonly reported. This randomized, prospective study compared general anesthesia (GA) and epidural anesthesia (EPID) with regard to effectiveness, side effects, induction time, and recovery in patients undergoing ESWL using an unmodified Dornier HM-3 lithotriptor. Twenty-six healthy outpatients were randomized to GA (propofol, N2O, laryngeal mask airway) or EPID (lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine). Intraoperative and postoperative supplemental medications, side effects, and complications were noted. Induction times and times required to meet standard recovery criteria were compared between groups. Patients were surveyed regarding their satisfaction with anesthesia. All patients in the EPID group had effective blocks with a single catheter insertion and local anesthetic injection. In the GA group, the LMA was inserted successfully in all patients. Time from room entry to procedure start was significantly less in the GA group (23 +/- 11 vs 34 +/- 9 min; P < 0.05). Patients in the GA group were ready for discharge home earlier (127 +/- 59 vs 178 +/- 49 min; P < 0.05). Only three patients experienced nausea (one in the GA group, two in the EPID group). There were no differences in patient or urologist satisfaction with anesthesia. We conclude that GA is associated with a rapid recovery compared with EPID. Implications: General anesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide, and a laryngeal mask airway is comparable to epidural anesthesia with lidocaine for outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy procedures. However, early recovery is more rapid after general anesthesia compared with epidural anesthesia.     

Analysis of health service areas: another piece of the psychiatric workforce puzzle

PURPOSE: To establish the benefit of nonpreserved intracameral lidocaine 1% as an adjunctive anesthetic agent to topical anesthesia for small incision cataract surgery and to determine the agent's safety with respect to corneal toxicity. SETTING: Advanced Vision Care, West Hills, California, USA. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of cataract surgery performed between January 1995 and March 1997 was done. The efficacy of intracameral lidocaine was determined by comparing the number of topical anesthesia cases (Group 1) and of combined topical and intracameral anesthesia cases (Group 2) that required conversion to a more profound level of local anesthesia, determined by patient discomfort, surgeon discomfort, or both. To determine the presence and bias of a surgical learning curve, Group 1 was subdivided chronologically into two subgroups. Corneal toxicity was assayed by the degree of clinical corneal edema noted by slitlamp examination on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-one charts satisfied the criteria for inclusion; 352 cases (Group 1) had topical anesthesia alone and 279 subsequent cases (Group 2), combined topical and intracameral anesthesia. In Group 1, 42.6% of cases required conversion to some form of additional local anesthesia, whereas in Group 2, less than 1.0% required conversion. In the earlier subgroup, 45.8% of cases required conversion and in the latter, 34.3%. On the first day after surgery, 88.2% of Group 2 cases and 76.7% of Group 1 cases were free from corneal edema. The difference was statistically significant but probably resulted from a change in phacoemulsification technique from sculpting to chopping in the latter cases, which were performed under combined topical and intracameral anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Intracameral nonpreserved lidocaine 1% appears to be both efficacious and nontoxic as an anesthetic adjunct in small incision cataract surgery.     

Ocular toxicity following topical application of anesthetic cream to the eyelid skin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of topical anesthetic cream in the periorbital region may be of clinical value. The potential for toxic effects from such use has not been studied in a controlled manner. This study was performed to evaluate the potential ocular toxicity of anesthetic cream topically applied to the eyelid in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten rabbits underwent periorbital eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) (2.5 percent lidocaine and 2.5 percent prilocaine) application and were observed for evidence of gross or microscopic ocular toxicity. Baseline external and anterior segment examinations were performed, including biomicroscopy and fluorescein staining, after which a standard quantity of EMLA cream (0.75 g) was applied along the upper eyelid and covered with an occlusive dressing. After 1 hour of treatment, the eyelid and anterior segment were examined for evidence of adverse reaction. The eyelids were excised and examined histopathologically. RESULTS: No significant adverse effects were noted on external lid and anterior segment examination. The histopathologic findings were within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that external application of EMLA cream to the eyelid does not induce local toxicity in the rabbit model. The external application of EMLA cream may be safe in the periorbital region.     

Correction of adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis with a new type of offset apical instrumentation: preliminary results

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the approximate incidence of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) [formerly known as transient radicular irritation (TRI)] associated with procaine spinal anesthesia, and whether fentanyl prolongs the duration of procaine spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Unrandomized pilot study. SETTING: Community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 106 consecutive patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia for procedures anticipated to last less than 90 minutes. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 5% procaine for spinal anesthesia. Fentanyl 20 micrograms was added for procedures anticipated to last longer than 45 minutes (but less than 90 min). Intraoperatively the adequacy of duration, level, and intensity of anesthesia were observed. Time from injection of local anesthetic until knee-bending was recorded. Three days postoperatively, patients were questioned intensively in an effort to determine whether back pain and/or symptoms consistent with TNS had occurred. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Duration of anesthesia was adequate in all but one instance. The intensity and the sensory level of anesthesia were satisfactory with one exception, a woman who had an unexpectedly low sensory level (L1) after 60 mg of procaine for cerclage, and who was also was the only patients to develop TNS. The incidence of TNS (0.9%) was markedly less than that reported after lidocaine and similar to the incidence observed after bupivacaine. Mild back pain without radiation occurred in 11 patients (10%), an incidence that is similar to that seen after bupivacaine and lidocaine. Compared with procaine alone, the addition of fentanyl significantly (p = 0.0001) prolonged the time to bending knees from 72 minutes to 97 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Procaine may be a useful alternative to lidocaine for short procedures, and it is less likely to produce TNS. Fentanyl prolongs motor block when added to procaine.     

Sub-Tenon's anesthesia and orbicularis oculi function

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the necessary volume of local anesthetic with added hyaluronidase that must be infiltrated to the sub-Tenon's space to achieve complete eyelid akinesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive patients were randomly assigned to two groups, receiving either 5 ml or 7 ml of local anesthetic to the sub-Tenon's space. Each patient was assessed clinically at 5 and 10 minutes for orbicularis oculi function. The anesthetic solution consisted of 5 ml of 2% lidocaine, 5 ml of 0.75% bupivacaine hydrochloride, and 1500 IU of hyaluronidase. A top-up of anesthetic infiltration was given in doses of 2 ml if excessive orbicularis muscle function persisted at 10 ml. Routine phacoemulsification surgery was performed, and, if necessary, a top-up of anesthetic was given on the table. RESULTS: Complete eyelid akinesia was achieved in 7.5% (3 of 40) of the patients in the 5-ml group and in 93.3% (42 of 45) of the patients in the 7-ml group (P < .005). There was no effect for 57.5% (23 of 40) of the patients in the 5-ml group and for 2.2% (1 of 45) of the patients in the 7-ml group. A top-up of anesthetic was given in the anesthetic room to 40 patients, 37 of whom were in the 5-ml group, and a Van Lint block of the facial nerves was necessary for 1 patient from the 5-ml group. An on-the-table top-up of anesthesia was necessary for 3 patients (2 from the 5-ml group, 1 from the 7-ml group). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of hyaluronidase promotes diffusion of sub-Tenon's anesthetic, resulting in effective akinesia of the orbicularis oculi. The infiltration of 7 ml of the anesthetic solution significantly improves the rate of eyelid akinesia.     

Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of using methotrexate vs Goeckerman therapy for psoriasis. A pilot study

PURPOSE: To compare topical tetracaine 0.5% alone and with intracameral lidocaine 1% as a local anesthetic agent in phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: The Toronto Hospital-Western Division, Toronto, Canada. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (60 eyes) having phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable acrylic IOL (AcrySof) were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: The intracameral balanced salt solution (BSS) group received topical tetracaine 0.5% plus intracameral BSS; the intracameral lidocaine group received topical tetracaine 0.5% with preservative-free intracameral lidocaine 1%. The patients' subjective experience of pain was measured at 4 points during surgery using a 4-point pain scale. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with the anesthesia used was measured using a 5-point satisfaction scale. Central endothelial cell counts were obtained preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured preoperatively and 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean pain score after phacoemulsification was significantly higher in the intracameral BSS group than in the intracameral lidocaine group (0.63 +/- 0.7 [SD] and 0.23 +/- 0.4, respectively, P < .019). The mean pain score at the end of surgery was also significantly higher in the intracameral BSS group than in the intracameral lidocaine group (0.60 +/- 0.6 and 0.21 +/- 0.4, respectively; P < .014). The surgeon satisfaction score was significantly lower for the intracameral BSS group than for the intracameral lidocaine group (3.90 +/- 1.2 and 4.73 +/- 0.8, respectively; P < .0007). There was no difference in patient satisfaction between the intracameral BSS and intracameral lidocaine groups (4.60 +/- 0.6 and 4.70 +/- 0.8). Endothelial cell loss 1 month postoperatively was similar between the 2 groups (6.1% +/- 8% and 6.7% +/- 6%). Ninety-seven percent of patients (29/30) in each group noted BCVA improvement from preoperatively. The rate of potential visual acuity recovery was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Topical tetracaine 0.5% with intracameral lidocaine was safe and effective in patients having phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. The advantage of using intracameral lidocaine 1% over a placebo was a significant decrease in the patients' subjective experience of pain and in the surgeon's satisfaction with the anesthesia used. None of the other parameters measured in this study differed significantly between the 2 groups.     

Spleen cells of non-obese diabetic mice fed with pig splenocytes display modified proliferation and reduced aggressiveness in vitro against pig islet cells

We experienced two cases of circulatory failure after local infiltration of 0.0005% epinephrine solution for the purpose of prophylactic hemostasis during tonsillectomy under sevoflurane anesthesia. Case 1: A 14 year-old girl developed ventricular bigeminy, tachycardia and hypertension following infiltration of the epinephrine solution 6ml around the tonsil. Sinus rhythm returned with intravenous lidocaine 40 mg and propranolol 0.4 mg. However, the patient showed gradually decreasing heart rate, depressed ST segments and inverted T waves and poor peripheral circulation. Her blood pressure decreased abruptly at the same time and finally the pulsation of the radial and femoral arteries was not palpable. She was treated with intravenous ephedrine in vain. Therefore, she received intravenous epinephrine and cardiac massage, and then recovered from the circulatory failure with her ECG showing normal sinus rhythms. Emergence from the anesthesia was smooth. Her cardiac failure may have been caused by the decreasing cardiac contraction and the increasing afterload due to the vasoconstriction after the intravenous beta-blocker. Case 2: An eleven year-old boy showed ventricular tachycardia and hypertension after infiltration of the epinephrine solution 11.5 ml around the tonsil. Lidocaine was given intravenously. This restored sinus rhythm but the ST segments on his ECG were elevated. ST segments became normalized after intravenous nitroglycerin. However, pulmonary edema developed suddenly, and it was cured by intensive treatment. His ventricular tachycardia and hypertension after the local administration of epinephrine were presumably responsible for the acute heart failure causing the pulmonary edema. Our experience suggests that the maintenance of cardiac function and the reduction of afterload are important to overcome the circulatory disaster following the local infiltration of epinephrine.     

Concept of stress ulcer prevention. Is re-thinking necessary?

BACKGROUND: Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) has been considered to be better in temporal and dose flexibility, as well as hemodynamic stability than single dose spinal anesthesia. However, the failure of spinal anesthesia is not a rare experience for anesthesiologists. Here we present our experience in solving the problem and discuss the possible causes for the failure. METHODS: 236 cases were studied retrospectively from January to December in 1996. All were over 65 years old, ASA III, scheduled for transurethral procedures or orthopedic operation. CSA was performed with 0.2% bupivacaine. Failed CSA was confirmed by positive pin-prick test at T10 dermatome(umbilicus) 30 minutes after 20 mg bupivacaine was injected. For failed cases, 5 mL 1% lidocaine was injected intrathecally for rescue. The failure rate, sensory and motor blockade, success rate by changing to lidocaine and its dosage were recorded. RESULTS: Eleven of 236 cases (4.7%) were considered spinal failure since the initial 20 mg bupivacaine could not provide adequate T10 anesthesia in 30 minutes. Addition of 5 mL 1% lidocaine produced a profound sensory and motor blockade in 9 cases, while further lidocaine injection was required in two cases. The success rate by rescuing lidocaine was 100% with an average lidocaine consumption by 52.5 +/- 4.5 mg. DISCUSSION: Factors contributed to failure spinal anesthesia including failure of technique, errors of judgment, maldistribution and failure of local anesthetic itself. However, we thought that change of pH value of local anesthetic in CSF may play a great part in these failed CSAs. Despite the reasons for failure, we demonstrate that failure of continuous spinal anesthesia by 0.2% bupivacaine can be readily resolved by 1% lidocaine.     

Continuous thoracic epidural blockade in combination with general anesthesia with nitrous oxide, oxygen, and sevoflurane in two patients with myasthenia gravis

Continuous thoracic epidural anesthesia (T4/5) using 4-5 ml.h-1 of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and inhaled anesthesia using nitrous oxide, oxygen and sevoflurane were performed in two patients, (40 and 22 yr-old females) with myasthenia gravis. This combined anesthetic technique provided muscle relaxation for endotracheal intubation and optimal operating conditions, including muscle relaxation and stability of hemodynamics during transsternal thymectomy. Further, continuous epidural anesthesia using 4 ml.h-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine provided postoperative pain relief without other analgesics and stable postoperative respiratory conditions. In conclusion, we confirm the benefits of this technique which provides not only safe and stable conditions during the surgery, but also an improved comfort for patients in the postoperative period following transsternal thymectomy for myasthenia gravis.     

Serum hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA in multitransfused thalassemics from eastern Sicily

To evaluate the efficacy of continuous administration of 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen for reducing pain during flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy 32 children aged 3-60 months were randomly assigned to an experimental or a control group. Indications for endoscopy included persistent atelectasis (6), wheezing (10) cystic fibrosis (2) pneumonia (11) persistent cough (3). All patients received Midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) atropine (20 mcg/kg) intra rectaly 20 minutes before the procedure. The flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus BF3C4) was inserted transnasally through a face mask. Topical anesthesia with 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (3 mg/kg) was applied to the nose, larynx, trachea and bronchial tree over 15 minutes through the suction chanel of the bronchoscope. All patients were monitored with a pulse oximeter and a cardiac monitor. The experimental group (n = 16) received 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen prior (3 minutes) and during flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy, the control group (n = 16) received only oxygen. We measured pain of the children by a behavioral observation scale (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale: CHEOPS) at each phase of topical anesthesia during bronchoscopy in the two groups. At the end of bronchoscopy physician's satisfaction was scored by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100) in which 0 corresponded to absence of satisfaction. Nitrous oxide was associated with lesser pain scores than those with oxygen. Physician significantly preferred these procedure compared with oxygen. No complication occurred during procedure. Combined with local anesthesia midazolam and atropin the administration of 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen seems a better choice for flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in children and should be used routinely.