The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types

This study compared the effect of different adhesive systems and composite resins on the shear bond strength (SBS) of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill composites(Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) and investigated failure modes. One hundred twenty cylindrical bulk-fill composite blocks (diameter 5?mm) were fabricated and thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5–55?°C). Specimens were roughened by diamond bur and divided into 8 groups (n?=?15). Bulk-fill blocks were repaired with the same material or nanohybrid composite resin(Tetric EvoCeram Nanohybrid) (diameter 3?mm) using different adhesive systems:Tetric N-Bond Universal (TSE);37% phosphoric acid etching?+?Tetric N-Bond Universal (TER); Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); 37% phosphoric acid etching?+?Adper^TMSingle Bond 2(SB). After repair procedures, all specimens were thermocycled again. The shear bond strengths were measured for all specimens using a universal test machine (crosshead speed of 1?mm/min). Cohesive strengths of bulk-fill composites were measured and described as control group. Debonded surfaces were observed with a stereomicroscope under 10x magnification to determine mode of failure. The SBS data of all groups was statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni correction test (p?<?0.05). The specimens repaired with bulk-fill composites showed significantly higher SBS values (25.86?±?5.74, 27.05?±?4.93, 24.49?±?6.95MPa) than those with nanohybrid composites (20.41?±?3.70, 22.08?±?6.37, 18.74?±?6.40?MPa) for TER,CSE,SB, respectively (p?<?0.05). There were no significant differences in SBS according to the type of adhesive systems for both repair materials (p?>?0.05). The predominant mode of failure was a mixed type in the restorative material except for the ones repaired with nanohybrid composites using Adper^TMSingle Bond 2. High-viscosity bulk-fill composites could be successfully repaired with the same materials. SBS of repaired bulk-fill composites reached cohesive strength for all tested groups.     

Effect of timing for core preparation,luting cement type and root level on adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin

This study assessed the effect of timing of core preparation and luting cement on adhesion of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts on different levels of intraradicular dentin when cemented with either conventional dual-polymerized or self-adhesive resin cement. Single-rooted human teeth (N = 80) were endodontically treated and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 40) according to resin cement: (a) Conventional dual resin cement (Variolink II, V) or (b) Self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, R). They were further divided into two subgroups according to timing of core preparation (n = 20): (a) immediate (i) or (b) delayed (d). FRC posts (Cytec Blanco) were cemented and the roots were sliced into discs at the coronal, middle, and apical levels. Push-out tests were then performed in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests considering the factors ‘core preparation time’, ‘luting cement’, and ‘root level’ (α = 0.05). Type of luting cement (p < 0.001), time of core preparation (p < 0.001), and root level (p < 0.001) significantly affected the bond strength results. R cement was more significantly affected by core preparation time (Ri: 2.91 ± 1.1; Rd: 4.83 ± 1.68) compared to V cement (Vi: 2.92 ± 1.63; Vd: 2.65 ± 1.6) (p < 0.05). Coronal region demonstrated significantly higher bond strength values than those of middle and apical third in all groups (coronal: 4 ± 1.9; middle: 3.1 ± 1.4; apical: 2.4 ± 1.1) (p < 0.05). Adhesive failure between cement and dentin was the most frequent (64%) followed by adhesive failure between cement and post (18%). Delayed core preparation can improve bond strength of FRC posts to intraradicular dentin when cemented with self-adhesive cement compared to conventional dual-polymerized resin cement.     

Degree of conversion and adhesion of methacrylate-based resin cements with phosphonic or phosphoric acid acrylate to glass fiber posts at different regions of intraradicular dentin

This study evaluated the degree of conversion (DC) and adhesion of methacrylate-based resin cements to glass fiber posts at different regions of intraradicular dentin. Single-rooted teeth (N?=?24, n?=?12 per group) were cut at the cement–enamel junction (CEJ), endodontically treated and post space (depth?=?8 mm) was prepared. Teeth were randomly divided into two groups according to the resin cements: (a) Group ML: methacrylate-based cement with phosphonic acid acrylate (Multilink Automix, Ivoclar Vivadent); (b) Group RXU: methacrylate-based cement with phosphoric acid acrylate (RelyX Unicem 2 Automix, 3 M ESPE). Fiber-reinforced composite root posts (RelyX Fiber Post, 3 M ESPE) were cemented according to the manufacturers’ instructions of the resin cements. Root slices of 2-mm thickness (n?=?3 per tooth) were cut below the CEJ 1, 3, and 5 mm apically. The DC of each section was analyzed with micro-Raman spectrometer and push-out test was performed in the Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). After debonding, all specimens were analyzed using optical microscope to categorize the failure modes. While data (MPa) were statistically evaluated using Kruskal Wallis, Mann–Whitney U tests for DC data 3-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were used (α?=?0.05). Regardless of the resin cement type, the mean push-out bond strength results (MPa), were significantly higher for the coronal slices (ML: 9.1?±?2.7; RXU: 7.3?±?4.1) than those of the most apical ones (ML: 7?±?4.9; RXU: 2.89?±?1.5) (p?=?0.002). Resin cement type and (p?p?=?0.002) significantly affected the DC values, while the interaction terms were not significant (p?=?0.606). Overall, DC was significantly higher for ML (67?±?8.2%) than RXU (26?±?8.8%) (p?相似文献   

The effect of curing lights and modes on dentin bond strength of bulk-fill composites applied in different thickness

To investigate shear bond strength (SBS) to dentin of a conventional and three bulk-fill composites applied in different increment thickness and cured by mono- and multi-wave LED LCUs. Two hundred and fifty-two extracted sound human molars were prepared for SBS test. The teeth were divided into four groups according to the resin composites used. Conventional composite: Tetric N-Ceram (control); high-viscosity bulk-fills: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, X-tra Fil, and SonicFill. Each group was subdivided (n?=?7) according to increment thickness (2, 4, and 6?mm) and cured by standard mode of a mono-wave LED or two different modes (standard and xtra power) of a multi-wave LED. The failure mode was stereomicroscopically determined at 40× magnification. Data were analyzed using Three-way ANOVA and further comparisons were assessed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. There were no significant differences within X-tra fil and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill groups for any of the variables (p?>?0.05). A significant decrease in SBS values with increase of layer thickness was observed for SonicFill and control groups. Also, curing mode had a significant effect on both composites at 6?mm thickness and standard mode of multi-wave LED caused the highest SBS value (p???0.05). Adhesive failure was the most common fracture pattern especially at 6?mm thickness applications. Based on the results of this study, the bulk-fill composites can be safely applied in one-step with 4?mm increments, although the examined composites performed better at 2?mm thickness. The performance of the composites at 6?mm increment may show differences related to the curing lights and modes.     

Bond strength of fiber posts and short fiber-reinforced composite to root canal dentin following cyclic loading*

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cyclic loading on the bond strength of fiber posts and short fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) to root canal. One hundred single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups according to the material used for luting fiber posts: (1) Resin-core material (Gradia Core, GC Corp.) and (2) Short FRC (EverX Posterior, GC Corp.). Then the specimens were randomly assigned into three sub-groups according to the post material and the groups are indicated as follows: (1) Short FRC (EverX Posterior) used instead of post and core, (2) Fiber post (GC post, GC Corp.) cemented with resin-core (Gradia Core), (3) Fiber post (GC post, GC Corp.) cemented with short FRC (EverX Posterior), (4) Experimental fiber post cemented with resin-core (Gradia Core, GC Corp), (5) Experimental fiber post cemented with short FRC (EverX Posterior). Then the specimens were subdivided into a further two groups in accordance with the storage condition (cyclic loading and 24 h water storage-control group) (n = 10/per group). The micropush-out bond strength between root dentin and posts was measured. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α = 0.05). Micropush-out bond strength of the posts to dentin was significantly affected by the type of post material (p < 0.05). However, the load cycling and the resin-based luting agent used had no effect on bond strength values (p = 0.706 and p = 0.346, respectively).     

Fatigue and fracture resistance of minimally invasive ceramic and resin composite veneers with different designs bonded adhesively to severely eroded teeth

This study evaluated the load bearing capacity of minimal invasive restoration alternatives on severely worn teeth after cyclic loading. Sound human maxillary incisors (N?=?72, n?=?9 per group) were randomly divided into nine experimental groups to receive one of the following restoration types: Group 1: Intact tooth, Group 2: Direct resin composite, Group 3: Lingual: Indirect resin composite, Labial: Ceramic veneer with lingual overlap, Group 4: Lingual: Indirect resin composite with lingual overlap, Labial: Ceramic, Group 5: Lingual: Direct composite, Labial: Ceramic, Group 6: Lingual: Feldspathic Ceramic, Labial: Feldspathic ceramic, Group 7: Lithium disilicate crown, Group 8: Metal-ceramic crown. Teeth were prepared simulating erosion/wear conditions. Specimens were subjected to cyclic loading (1,200,000 cycles, 5–55?°C) and then loaded to failure from the lingual surface at 105° inclination (1?mm/min). Data (Newton) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey`s tests and Weibull moduli were calculated (α?=?0.05). Significant differences were observed between the groups for the initial (p?=?0.006) and maximum fracture load (p?=?0.002). Group 3 (55?±?36) presented significantly lower initial fracture load compared to other groups (79?±?35–134?±?36) (p?<?0.05). When maximum fracture load is considered, control group (1) (602?±?355) and from restored groups 2 (449?±?144) and 4 (495?±?291) showed significantly higher results (p?<?0.05). Weibull modulus for the maximum fracture load was the highest for Group 2 (m?=?3.47) among all groups (m?=?1.61–4.18). Groups 2, 3, 6 presented the highest incidence of repairable failures. Based on the results, severely worn teeth could be restored with lingual direct resin composite and labial veneering with indirect resin with overlap.     

Effect of temporary cement removal methods from human dentin on zirconia-dentin adhesion

This study evaluated the effect of temporary cement residue removal methods from human coronary dentin on the bond strength of adhesively-luted zirconia on dentin. Forty non-carious human molars were embedded in acrylic resin and the dentin surfaces were exposed. Temporary acrylic crowns were provisionally cemented with zinc oxide cement without eugenol and stored in distilled water (37?°C/15?days). After crown removal, the excess temporary cement was removed from dentin according to one of the following cleaning methods: (n?=?8 per group): (a) air-water rinse (AW), (b) pumice paste (PP), (c) air-abrasion with aluminum oxide particles (Al₂O₃) (AA), (d) sodium bicarbonate spray (SB) or (e) glycine powder (CP). Forty zirconia cylinders were made and each cylinder was adhesively luted onto each tooth after adhesive resin (Scotch Bond Universal, 3?M ESPE-SBU) application using resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3?M ESPE) and photo-polymerized from each surface for 20?s. The bonded specimens were stored in distilled water (37?°C) for 90?days. The bonded interface was loaded under shear (1?mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α?=?0.05). Mean bond strength was significantly affected by the cleaning method (p?=?0.0289). Cleaning with AA method resulted in significantly higher bond strength than with SB (p?<?0.05) but similar to CP, PP and AW (p?>?0.05). All cleaning methods were effective in removing temporary resin cement from dentin surfaces. Air-abrasion with aluminum oxide particles was more effective than with sodium bicarbonate spray promoting adhesion between zirconia and dentin.     

Effects of chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of resin composite to different mineral trioxide aggregate based cements

This study investigated the adhesion of resin composite to mineral trioxide aggregate based cements after different chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods. Mineral trioxide aggregate based cements (Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, Imicryl MTA) were embedded in Teflon disks (N?=?180). After storing at 37?°C at 100% humidity for 72?h, substrate surfaces were polished using silicon carbide papers. Specimens were allocated to 3 groups to be conditioned with one of the following (n?=?15 per group): a) Adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond, CSE), b) Adhesive resin (Adper Single Bond 2, SB2), c) air-abrasion with 30?μm alumina coated with silica?+?silane?+?adhesive resin (ALB), d) no surface conditioning, control group (CON). Microhybrid resin composite (Filtek Z250) was applied on the conditioned substrate surfaces and photo-polymerized. After storage at 37?°C at 100% humidity for 24?h, adhesive interfaces were loaded under shear (1?mm/min) in a universal testing machine. After debonding failure types were analyzed. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = 0.05). SBS results were significantly affected by surface conditioning (p?<?0.05) and materials (p?<?0.05). Interaction terms were significant (p?<?0.05). Biodentine-ALB resulted in significantly higher SBS values (3.96?±?1.24) compared to those of other combinations, while ALB and SB2 resulted in no significant difference for ProRoot MTA and Imicryl MTA (p?>?.05). CSE (1.36?±?0.5- 1.98?±?0.76) did not significantly increase SBS for all MTA materials compared to the control group (0.8?±?0.52 – 2?±?0.91) (p?>?9.05). While CON groups resulted in exclusively adhesive failures, ALB presented the highest incidence of mixed failures for all materials tested (60–100%).     

Cuspal deflection and microleakage in pre molar teeth restored with bulk-fill resin-based composites

The aim of this study was to assess the cuspal deflection and cervical microleakage of premolar teeth filled with a bulk-fill composite resin or bulk-fill flowable composite resin base, and comparison between them and a conventional dimethacrylate and a silorane-base composite resin. Forty maxillary premolar teeth were divided into four groups (n?=?10), standardized large mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared. The distance between cusp tips was measured before and after the cavity preparations with a digital micrometer. In Group 1 Quixfil was used with bulk-fill technique. Teeth in Group 2 were restored to within 2?mm of palatal cusp in a single increment with x-tra base. The remaining occlusal cavity was restored with GrandioSO. In Groups 3 and 4, the teeth were incrementally restored with GrandioSO and Filtek Silorane, respectively. Cuspal deflection was measured 5?min, 24?h, 1 week, and 2 weeks after the completion of restorations. Each restored tooth was subjected to thermocycling regime, and microleakage was assessed. Data were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests (p?<?0.05). Groups restored with bulk-fill composites (Groups 1 and 2) showed similar cuspal deflection with the group restored incrementally with GrandioSO. A significant reduction in cuspal deflection was observed in Filtek Silorane restorations. None of the groups showed complete prevention of dye penetration. Group 2 showed the best marginal sealing. In Conclusion, conventional composite resin applied by incremental technique caused cuspal deflection similar to that of bulk-fill composites used as restorative or base. The flowable bulk-fill composites were superior to others in preventing microleakage.     

Efficacy of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill composite repair

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments and aging on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill composite resins. Bulk-fill composites (Filtek One; 3M ESPE) randomly received five different surface treatments: (1) no treatment, control, (2) 37% phosphoric acid etching (PA), (3) 9% hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), (4) air-borne particle abrasion with 50-μm alumina particles (Al₂O₃), (5) tribochemical silica coating (CoJet). Following, the specimens were divided into three subgroups according to universal adhesive applied: Clearfil Universal Bond (CU; Kuraray), Prime&Bond Universal (PBU; Dentsply Sirona), or Single Bond Universal (SBU; 3M ESPE). A nanofill composite (Filtek Ultimate; 3M ESPE) was employed as a repair. Bonded specimens were stored in water for 24?h at 37?°C or thermal aged, then subjected to the μTBS test. Additionally, specimens were analyzed with a contact profilometer and were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy. Control and PA treatments were showed the lowest µTBS (p?<?0.05), and there was no significant difference between these two groups (p?>?0.05). Al₂O₃ and CoJet treatments generally exhibited a similar influence on µTBS values. In addition, a correlation was found between surface roughness and bond strength (r?=?0.831). CoJet resulted in significantly higher repair µTBS values when compared to the other surface treatments. In addition, the use of silane-containing universal adhesive was increased the cohesive failure rate and maintained the repair µTBS values after thermocycling.     

Adhesion potential of relining materials to polyamide and PMMA-based denture base materials: effect of surface conditioning methods

This study evaluated the bond strength of relining materials to different denture base materials polyamide and polymethylmethacrylate denture base materials after various surface conditioning methods. Denture base resin specimens (N?=?128; n?=?8 per group) (10?×?10?×?2.5?mm³) were fabricated out of injection-moulded thermoplastic polyamide resin (POL) (Deflex) and heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA, Dura Dent) (HC). The specimens were randomly divided into 4 main groups according to different surface conditioning methods: (a) No conditioning, control (C), (b) grinding with green stone (G), (c) application of primer (V), (d) silica coating with Al₂O₃ particles coated with SiO₂ (Rocatec) (R). Half of the specimens in each group received auto-polymerized hard relining resin (GC, GC Reline Hard) and the other half PMMA based relining resin (SC, Dura Dent). After thermocycling (×5000), the bonded specimens were tested under tensile forces (0.5?mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests (alpha = 0.05). Bond strength of relining resins were significantly higher to PMMA than to POL, regardless of the conditioning method (p?<?0.05). While R positively affected the bond strength results (p?<?0.05) (4.99?±?1.65–3.27?±?1.31), application V or G did not show significant effect to POL-relining resin adhesion. After R conditioning, bond strength values were significantly higher in HC-GC group (7.48?±?2.32) than POL-GC group (3.27?±?1.31) (p?<?0.05). Adhesion of auto-polymerized relining materials to thermoplastic polyamide or polymethylmethacrylate denture resins could be improved after surface conditioning with silica-coating.     

The bonding effect of adhesive systems and bulk-fill composites to sound and caries-affected dentine

Purpose: To investigate the influence of adhesive type and increment thickness on shear bond strength of flowable bulk-fill resin composites compared with a flowable conventional resin composite, in both sound and caries-affected dentine.

Methods: Shear bond strength was tested in 100 extracted human molars with coronal dentine caries. Half of the teeth were restored with Adper? Easy Bond and the other half with Adper? Single Bond Plus. Bonded surfaces were restored with Filtek? Ultimate Flow and two bulk-fill composites (SDR and X-tra base) (n = 10 teeth for each subgroup). Restorations of 4 mm were performed with incremental or bulk-fill technique. The shear bond was determined and statistically analysed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc tests (p ≤ 0.05). Dentine–resin interfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy.

Results: For both adhesives, the highest shear bond strength values were obtained for sound dentine. In sound dentine, the highest bond strength observed with Easy Bond when used in 2-mm increments of SDR. In caries-affected dentine, Single Bond in combination with SDR displayed significantly lower bond strength.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the incremental and bulk-fill groups for molars with sound dentine when the etch-and-rinse adhesive system was used; however, for the self-etch adhesive system, incremental application caused higher bond strength than bulk application.     

Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of repair composite to indirect restorative materials

This study evaluated the effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a restorative composite to indirect restorative materials. Blocks (5?×?5 × 4?mm³) (N?=?72) of (a) Zirconia (In-Ceram Zirconia, Vita) (ZR), (b) lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS Empress II, Ivoclar Vivadent) (LD), (c) Indirect resin composite (Gradia, GC) (GR) were fabricated (n?=?24 per group) and divided randomly into three groups: 1-Control: no conditioning, 2-Silane coupling agent, 3-Hydrofluoric acid (9.5%) (HF)+silane. Each block was duplicated in resin composite. The adhesion surfaces were conditioned with airborne-particle abrasion (110?µm Al₂O₃ particles). Half of the conditioned blocks received no bonding and the other half one coat of bonding (ED Primer II, Kuraray). Each conditioned block was bonded to a composite block with a resin luting agent (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray). The blocks were sectioned into 1?mm² microsticks and tested for microtensile bond strength (µTBS) (0.5?mm/min) in a μTBS testing machine. Failure types were evaluated under stereomicroscope and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, Bonferroni corrected and independent sample t-tests (p?<?0.05). Significant effect of the bonding (p?<?0.001) and surface conditioning (p?<?0.001) were observed in all groups. The highest mean bond strength values were obtained in the bonded, HF etched and silanized groups of ZR, LD and GR (12.4?±?2.9, 28.1?±?1.5 and 27.2?±?2?MPa, respectively). HF acid?+?silane increased the repair bond values in all materials. Majority of the failure types were adhesive for ZR group, whereas HF?+?silane conditioned LD and GR groups presented predominantly cohesive failures in the cement.     

Effect of different air-abrasion protocols on topography,surface wettability and adhesion of MDP monomer-based resin cement to zirconia

This study evaluated the effect of air-abrasion protocols on the topography, surface wettability and adhesion of resin cement to zirconia. Ceramic specimens (N?=?49; n?=?7) (15?mm × 2?mm) were randomly allocated to seven groups to be treated with: (1) Air-abrasion with 45?μm Al₂O₃ (A45), (2) 80?μm Al₂O₃ (A80), (3) 30?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (CoJet) (C30), (4) 30?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (Rocatec Soft) (R30), (5) 110?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (Rocatec Plus) (R110); (6) R110R30 (Rocatec) (R110R30) and (7) control, no conditioning (NC). Air-abrasion was performed using a chairside air-abrasion device (2.5?bar, 10?mm, 90?s). Contact angle measurements were performed using goniometry (n?=?5). MDP-based dual resin cement (Panavia F2.0) was bonded on four locations after air-abrasion protocols (n?=?20 per group). Half of the specimens were tested after 24?h and the other half after thermal cycling (×3000, 5–55?°C). Data were analyzed using 1-, 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = 0.05). Significantly lower contact angle values were observed for groups C30 (62.6?±?0.91), R30 (61.91?±?1.05) and R110R30 (61.54?±?1.02) compared to those of other groups (65.5?±?0.9–110.61?±?0.9) (p?<?0.05). In dry conditions, surface conditioning methods tested did not show significant effect on bond strength (MPa) (10.57?±?1.42–16.86?±?2.54) (p?=?0.238). After thermocycling, bond strength results decreased significantly (p?<?0.05) (12.6–51.2%). R110 (7.18?±?1.34) and A80 (4.92?±?1.53) showed significantly higher bond strength compared to other groups (2.13?±?0.73–4.16?±?1.34) (p?<?0.05). The best wettability and adhesion results with MDP-based resin cement to zirconia was achieved with A80 and R110 air-abrasion.     

An investigation of atomic force microscopy,surface topography and adhesion of luting cements to zirconia: effect of silica coating,zirconia primer and laser

This study evaluated the effect various surface conditioning methods on the surface topography and adhesion of luting cements to zirconia. Zirconia blocks (N?=?25) were randomly assigned to five groups according to the surface conditioning methods: (a) No conditioning, control (CON), (b) tribochemical silica coating (TSC), (c) MDP-based zirconia primer (ZRP), (d) coating with nano aluminum nitride (ALN) (e) etching with Er: YAG laser (LAS). The conditioned zirconia blocks were further divided into five subgroups to receive the luting cements: (a) MDP-based resin cement (Panavia F2.0) (PAN), (b) 4-META-based cement (Super Bond) (SUB), (c) UDMA-based (GCem) (GCE), (d) bis-GMA based (Bifix QM) (BIF) and (e) polycarboxylate cement (Poly-F) (POL). Cements were applied in polyethylene moulds (diameter: 3?mm; height: 2?mm). The bonded specimens were first thermocycled for 5500 cycles (5–55?°C) and then adhesive interface was loaded under shear (0.5?mm/min). The data (MPa) were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA, Tukey’s and Bonneferroni tests (alpha?=?0.05). Regardless of the cement type, TSC resulted in significantly higher bond strength (p???0.05) (13.3?±?4.35–25.3?±?6.3) compared to other conditioning methods (2.96?±?1.5–5.4?±?5.47). Regardless of the surface conditioning method, no significant difference was found between MDP, 4-META and UDMA based cements (p?>?0.05) being significantly higher than those of bis-GMA and polycarboxylate cements (p???0.05). Failure types were frequently adhesive in all groups. Tribochemical silica coating provided superior bond results compared to other conditioning methods tested on zirconia especially in conjunction with UDMA- and 4-META-based resin cements.     

Evaluation of different desensitizing agents effect on shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin

Desensitizing agents can inhibit the bonding strength between dentin and adhesive resin cement. This study evaluated the effects of different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin. Sixty freshly extracted and caries free teeth were classified into five experimental groups, randomly (n?=?12). Each group was treated with a different desensitizing agent (Teethmate, Shield Force Plus, Admira Protect and Ultra-Ez) respectively, except for an untreated control group. After desensitizing agents and adhesive resin cement were applied to each dentin surface, all specimens were stored in incubator at 37?°C for 24?h. The shear bond strength was tested with a Universal testing machine at a 0.5?mm/min crosshead speed. Data were analysed by using a statistical software (SPSS 22). The results of the measurements were analysed by Kruskal Wallis test with Bonferroni correction and multiple comparisons were made by Wilcoxon test (p???.01). Specimens were examined by a scanning electron microscope, additionally. The Shield Force Plus showed significantly the highest shear bond strength compared with other groups (p?<?.01). Ultra-Ez showed the lowest shear bond strength (p?>?.01). There was no significant difference among Teethmate and Admira Protect groups (p?>?.01). Desensitizing agents containing resin monomers increased the bonding strength, however desensitizers containing calcium phosphate, potassium nitrate and fluoride did not effect the bonding strength of resin cement to dentin.     

Microscopic evaluation of the thickness and structure of the cement and cement–dentin interdiffusion zone after luting posts with three different luting cements

Clinical studies report that failures of fiber post cementation occur mainly at the cement–dentin interface. The aim of this in vitro study is to compare the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) evaluations of the cement thicknesses in the root canals and the thickness of cement–dentin interface zones obtained after luting standardized glass-fiber posts with three different types of luting cements. Thirty single-rooted mandibular premolars of similar sizes were prepared for post insertion after biomechanical preparation and obturation. They were divided into three groups containing 10 samples each. Standardized glass-fiber posts were cemented with zinc phosphate cement for ZNP group, with conventional adhesive resin cement for CAR group, and with self-adhesive resin cement for SAR group. The formation and thickness of cement and cement–dentin interface zone were evaluated by stereomicroscope and SEM using ×800 magnification, and the data were analyzed. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of cement thickness (p = 0.835); however, there were significant differences among the cement layer thicknesses measured at the three examined levels of the root canals (p = 0.000). The groups using conventional adhesive resin cement presented longer micromechanical interlocking while the groups using self-adhesive resin cement showed wide gaps and zinc phosphate cement showed no bonding between cement–dentin interdiffusion zones along the root canal. As a clinical consequence, the use of zinc phosphate cement may not provide strong bond between dentin–cement interface. Conventional adhesive resin cements showed reliable bond to dentin when compared to zinc phosphate and self-adhesive resin cement.     

Bond strengths of bulk-fill resin composite repairs: effect of different surface treatment protocols in vitro

To evaluate the effect of different surface treatment protocols on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composite repairs. Thirty-five bulk-fill resin composite samples (Filtek Bulk Fill) were prepared (5 × 5 × 5 mm) and aged by thermocycling (X5000). Samples were randomly divided into five groups (n = 7): a control (no treatment) and four surface treatment groups (Single Bond Universal [SBU]; phosphoric acid (37%) + SBU; Er,Cr:YSGG laser + SBU; aluminum oxide sandblasting + SBU). Filtek Ultimate Universal composite was used as a repair material. After storage for 24 h in distilled water (37 °C), sticks were obtained and subjected to a μTBS test. The data (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with a post hoc test (α = 0.05). Failure mode was evaluated using a light microscope (10×). There were significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). The lowest bond strength values were obtained in the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between Group II (universal adhesive) and Group III (acid etch + universal adhesive) (p > 0.05). The bond strength of Group II was significantly lower than that of the other surface treatment groups (p < 0.05). While Group III showed significantly lower values than those of the laser treatment group (Group IV), similar values were obtained with Al₂O₃ sandblasting group (Group V). The highest repair bond strength was obtained in Group IV (p < 0.05) which was not significantly different from the Al₂O₃ sandblasting group (p > 0.05). The predominant failure mode was adhesive. Treatment of aged bulk-fill resin composite surfaces with laser and Al₂O₃ sandblasting provided higher repair bond strength values.     

Effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity disinfectant on microtensile bond strength of tooth-coloured restorative materials to sound and caries-affected dentin

This study evaluated the effect of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-based cavity disinfectant (CHX) on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and packable resin composite to sound and caries-affected dentin. Sound and occlusal caries-affected human third molars (N?=?36, n?=?3 per group) were randomly divided into three experimental groups to receive one of the following restorative materials. (a) Glass ionomer (Ketac Molar, 3 M ESPE; GI), (b) resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer, 3 M ESPE; RMGI) and (c) packable resin composite (Surefil, Dentsply; PRC) with a bonding agent (Prime Bond NT, Dentsply De Trey). Caries was removed using a caries-detecting dye (Caries Detector, Kuraray Medical Ltd.) and flat dentin surfaces were achieved by finishing up to 1200-grit silicon carbide abrasive. Half of the teeth in each group received 2% CHX (Consepsis, Ultradent). Dentin surfaces were built-up with the respective materials incrementally and were sectioned with a slow-speed saw into multiple beams. The beams were subjected to μTBS test (0.5 mm/min) in a Universal Testing Machine. The data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s tests. For each restorative material, μTBS results were not affected by the application of CHX (p?>?0.05) on both sound and caries-affected dentin (p?>?0.05). PRC in combination with the corresponding bonding agent showed significantly higher results (p?<?0.05) than those of GI and RMGI, on sound and caries-affected teeth, respectively. Cohesive failure in dentin was not observed in any of the groups. The use of 2% chlorhexidine-based cavity disinfectant did not impair the adhesion of the restorative materials tested to either sound or caries-affected dentin.     

The effect of canal cleansing protocols on cementation of a fiber post to saliva-contaminated root canals

Objective: This study investigated the effect of saliva contamination and cleansing effect of a self-etching primer (SEP), phosphoric acid (PA), chlorhexidine (CHX), and ethanol (EtOH) on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a fiber post cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement (SAC) to root canal dentin.

Material and methods: Sixty human lower premolar roots were randomly divided into 10 groups: (1) no saliva contamination, no cleansing (Control); (2) no saliva contamination, cleansing with SEP (NC-SEP); (3) no saliva contamination, cleansing with PA (NC-PA); (4) no saliva contamination, cleansing with CHX (NC-CHX); (5) no saliva contamination, cleansing with EtOH (NC-EtOH); (6) with saliva contamination, no cleansing (SC-NC); (7) with saliva contamination, cleansing with SEP (SC-SEP); (8) with saliva contamination, cleansing with PA (SC-PA); (9) with saliva contamination, cleansing with CHX (SC-CHX); (10) with saliva contamination, cleansing with EtOH (SC-EtOH). After cementation of posts, the roots were transversally sectioned to obtain six slices (n = 36) followed by μTBS test. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (p = 0.05).

Results: Saliva contamination and cleansing methods had a significant effect on μTBS values (p < 0.0001). All cleansing agents improved bond strengths when compared with Control and SC-NC. Cleansing with CHX and ethanol showed lower μTBS values than phosphoric acid and SEP, regardless of saliva contamination (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Saliva contamination negatively affected bonding performance of SAC to root dentin. However; SEP, PA, CHX and EtOH can be used on contaminated dentin surfaces to optimize bonding performance of self-adhesive cements.