Influence of different surface treatments on zirconia/resin shear bond strength using one-bottle universal adhesive

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different treatments on the zirconia/resin shear bond strength (SBS) using commercial one-bottle universal adhesive. Zirconia discs with different surface treatments (blank control; airborne-particle-abrasion; glazing) were bonded to the bovine enamel surfaces using one-bottle universal adhesive. All specimens were tested for SBS (MPa) before and after 10000 thermocycles. Statistically analysis were conducted by using one-way analysis of variance and multiple-comparison least significant difference tests (α = 0.05). Airborne-particle-abrasion group showed higher SBS (36.19 ± 11.86) than control group (14.98 ± 5.90) and glazing group (10.63 ± 5.39) (p < 0.05). After thermocycling test, the SBS significantly decreased for control group (8.84 ± 2.55) and glazing group (6.18 ± 2.78) while not for airborne-particle-abrasion group (41.5 ± 7.95). One-bottle universal adhesives combined with airborne-particle-abrasion showed quite high SBS of zirconia/resin, which was appropriate for bonding of zirconia restoration.     

The effect of curing lights and modes on dentin bond strength of bulk-fill composites applied in different thickness

To investigate shear bond strength (SBS) to dentin of a conventional and three bulk-fill composites applied in different increment thickness and cured by mono- and multi-wave LED LCUs. Two hundred and fifty-two extracted sound human molars were prepared for SBS test. The teeth were divided into four groups according to the resin composites used. Conventional composite: Tetric N-Ceram (control); high-viscosity bulk-fills: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, X-tra Fil, and SonicFill. Each group was subdivided (n?=?7) according to increment thickness (2, 4, and 6?mm) and cured by standard mode of a mono-wave LED or two different modes (standard and xtra power) of a multi-wave LED. The failure mode was stereomicroscopically determined at 40× magnification. Data were analyzed using Three-way ANOVA and further comparisons were assessed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. There were no significant differences within X-tra fil and Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill groups for any of the variables (p?>?0.05). A significant decrease in SBS values with increase of layer thickness was observed for SonicFill and control groups. Also, curing mode had a significant effect on both composites at 6?mm thickness and standard mode of multi-wave LED caused the highest SBS value (p???0.05). Adhesive failure was the most common fracture pattern especially at 6?mm thickness applications. Based on the results of this study, the bulk-fill composites can be safely applied in one-step with 4?mm increments, although the examined composites performed better at 2?mm thickness. The performance of the composites at 6?mm increment may show differences related to the curing lights and modes.     

Microtensile bond strength of composite-to-composite repair with different surface treatments and adhesive systems

Objectives: The purpose was to investigate the effect of different surface treatments and bonding agents on the repair bond strength of different resin-based restorative materials by microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing protocol. Materials and Methods: 24 Grandio SO(VOCO) and 24 Filtek Z250(3?M) resin composite blocks were prepared. Half of the samples (N?=?12) were diamond bur-roughened and the other half (N?=?12) were sandblasted by 50?μm aluminum oxide particles. They were further divided into four sub-groups (n?=?3) and received the following: Sub-Group1: Adper Single Bond2 (Etch&Rinse) (3?M); Sub-Group2: Clearfil SE (Self-etch) (Kuraray); Sub-Group3: Beauty Bond (HEMA-free all-in-one) (Shofu); Sub-Group4: All Bond3 (HEMA-free, hydrophobic, etch&rinse) (Bisco). The samples were repaired by Filtek Z250 to form a block. All of the resultant sub-groups combinations consisted of one of the composite type, surface treatment type, and adhesive systems. A total of 18 groups were prepared including 2 homogeneous blocks. They were thermocycled and μTBS measurements were performed. Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: The experimental regroups’ μTBS reached to 34.67–66.36% and 43.44–95.52% of the cohesive bond strength for Grandio SO and Z250, respectively. The pre-existing composite type is found to be statistically important. When the surface is bur-finished Grandio performed better; when air-abrasion is considered Z250 showed higher bond strength. All-in-one adhesive system produced the weakest bond strength at all parameters. Conclusion: It may be suggested that when the pre-existing composite is unknown, air-abrasion may be performed with etch&rinse or two-step self-etch adhesives.     

The influence of retention hole and adhesive systems on the shear bond strengths of resin composite to amalgam

The aim of the study is to evaluate the influence of surface-treatment methods with and without the use of a retention hole on the shear bond strength of a resin composite adhered to amalgam using an adhesive system. Amalgam specimens were divided into six groups. Group 1 (Bur) specimens were roughened with a diamond bur, Group 2 (Al₂O₃) specimens were sandblasted with a 50?μm aluminum oxide powder, Group 3 (CoJet^®) specimens were sandblasted with 30?μm CoJet^® Sand, Group 4 (Bur?+?Rh) specimen surfaces were prepared with a retention hole 1?mm in diameter and 1?mm deep and roughened with a diamond bur, Group 5 (Al₂O₃?+?Rh) specimens were also prepared with a retention hole and sandblasted with 50?μm aluminum oxide powder, and Group 6 (CoJet^®?+?Rh) surfaces were prepared with a retention hole and sandblasted with 30?μm CoJet^® Sand. Resin composite cylinders were bonded onto the amalgam surfaces using Xeno^® IV, Optibond? All-In-One, Clearfil? SE Bond, Adper? Single Bond Plus, and Scotchbond? Multi-Purpose adhesive systems. In addition, silane (Monobond S) was used for Groups 5 and 6. The shear bond was determined and statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey’s tests (p?≤?0.05). The surface treatment significantly affected the shear bond strengths of the adhesive systems. The shear bond strengths of Optibond? All-In-One (2.661?±?0.48?MPa) in Group 1 and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3.818?±?0.98) in Group 4 were significantly higher than those of the other adhesive systems. Silica coating of the amalgam surface significantly improved the shear bond strength of the resin composites. The addition of a retention hole on the amalgam affects the bonding strength of the composite adhesion.     

Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength of refrigerated and pre-heated of different composite resins to orthodontic molar tubes

Objective: To evaluate the effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic tubes to acid-etched human enamel using different temperatures and orthodontic composite resins. Methods: One hundred and twenty metal tubes were bonded to human third molars, which were randomly divided into three groups depending on the composite used: Transbond XT (XT); Transbond Supreme LV (LV); and Light Bond (LB). Each group was divided into four subgroups depending on the temperature (5°, 20°, 40°, and 60°) applied to the composite before cementing. For each experimental subgroup, half the specimens were bonded in combination with XT Primer. After 72?h, a SBS test was performed using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, post hoc intergroup comparisons, chi-square test, and linear regression. Two representative molar surfaces from each subgroup were assessed under Scanning electron microscope. Results: The composite type only influenced XT regarding LB. The use of adhesive does not affect the SBS values of any composite. The flowable composites with adhesive containing zirconia (LV) as a filler showed lower SBS when cooled to 5?°C and when increases the temperature from 40?°C. Whether adhesive was used or not, composites with silica as filler (LB) showed lower SBS at 60?°C and increased to 5?°C. Conclusions: For all composites, from 20?°C, SBS values tend to increased and started to decline at 40°C except when adhesive is applied to the quartz-filled composite, which continues to increase, and the silica-filled composite without adhesive, which tend to decreases from 5?°C.     

Effect of surface conditioning methods,adhesive systems and resin composite on repair strength of dimethacrylate and silorane resin composites

This study evaluated the effect of surface conditioning methods and adhesive systems on the repair bond strength of resin composites. Specimens (FLS: Filtek LS) (N = 144) were prepared using a silicone matrix. The specimens were stored in distilled water and then were randomly divided into the twelve groups (n = 12) according to the surface conditioning method (unground or diamond bur) and adhesive system (no adhesive, LS: Filtek LS, AS: Adper Scotchbond SE Plus) and resin composite (FLS: Filtek LS; FS: Filtek Supreme). The specimens were fixed in an hourglass-shaped silicone matrix and the other half of the specimen was restored. Hourglass-shaped specimens (n = 12) were used as positive control to measure the cohesive strength of the resin composite (Filtek LS). Microtensile bond test was performed (0.5 mm/min) and failure types were analyzed. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, Tukey’s and Dunnett’s tests (α = 0.05). Adhesive protocol and resin composite significantly affected the results (p < 0.05). For the FS composite, the highest results were obtained using LS adhesive with (18.4 ± 7.7) and without (18.8 ± 4.8) bur roughening. For FLS composite, the highest results were obtained using AS adhesive with (33.2 ± 7.1) and without (25.7 ± 3.6) bur roughening. Without the use of adhesive resin, significantly lower bond strength results were observed with both LS (5 ± 2.1, 4.5 ± 1.5) and FLS (2.2 ± 1.2, 4.4 ± 1.1) for unground and diamond bur roughened groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Cohesive strength of the FLS (52.3 ± 7.6) was significantly higher than any of the repaired groups (p < 0.0001). FS–LS combination and the groups repaired without adhesive presented more adhesive (Type I) failures.     

Bond strengths of bulk-fill resin composite repairs: effect of different surface treatment protocols in vitro

To evaluate the effect of different surface treatment protocols on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composite repairs. Thirty-five bulk-fill resin composite samples (Filtek Bulk Fill) were prepared (5 × 5 × 5 mm) and aged by thermocycling (X5000). Samples were randomly divided into five groups (n = 7): a control (no treatment) and four surface treatment groups (Single Bond Universal [SBU]; phosphoric acid (37%) + SBU; Er,Cr:YSGG laser + SBU; aluminum oxide sandblasting + SBU). Filtek Ultimate Universal composite was used as a repair material. After storage for 24 h in distilled water (37 °C), sticks were obtained and subjected to a μTBS test. The data (MPa) were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with a post hoc test (α = 0.05). Failure mode was evaluated using a light microscope (10×). There were significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). The lowest bond strength values were obtained in the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between Group II (universal adhesive) and Group III (acid etch + universal adhesive) (p > 0.05). The bond strength of Group II was significantly lower than that of the other surface treatment groups (p < 0.05). While Group III showed significantly lower values than those of the laser treatment group (Group IV), similar values were obtained with Al₂O₃ sandblasting group (Group V). The highest repair bond strength was obtained in Group IV (p < 0.05) which was not significantly different from the Al₂O₃ sandblasting group (p > 0.05). The predominant failure mode was adhesive. Treatment of aged bulk-fill resin composite surfaces with laser and Al₂O₃ sandblasting provided higher repair bond strength values.     

The effect of different bonding protocols on the repair microshear bond strength of water-stored CAD/CAM resin composite

This study evaluated the repair microshear bond strength (μSBS) of water stored CAD/CAM resin composite under eight different surface treatments using a silane-containing universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse and self-etching modes. In total, 48 CAD/CAM resin composite slices were prepared from Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM blocks and stored in water for 6 months. The slices were assigned into 8 main groups, according to surface treatments (no treatment, no-treatment/silane, surface grinding, surface grinding/silane, sandblasting, sandblasting/silane, silica coating and silica coating/silane). Each main group was divided according to the universal adhesive application mode (either the etch-and-rinse mode or the self-etch mode). Each slice received 6 resin composite micro-cylinders (0.8 × 1 mm). Micro-shear bond strength was run at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until failure. Treated surfaces were examined using SEM. Bond strength data were statistically analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA/Tukey HSD post hoc test. Only ‘surface treatment’ significantly affected the repair μSBS (p ? 0.001). Parameters ‘Adhesive application mode’ and ‘surface treatment × adhesive mode’ showed no significant effect on μSBS (p = 0.458 and p = 0.286 respectively). Regardless of the adhesive application mode, silica coating showed the highest μSBS (21.6 ± 6.8 MPa), while sandblasting/silane showed the lowest μSBS (13.0 ± 6.1 MPa). Regardless of adhesive application mode, the use of silica coating to treat the water-stored CAD/CAM resin composite surfaces is crucial to improve the repair bond strength.     

Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength of flowable composite resins and APC plus to orthodontic molar tubes

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic tubes to acid-etched human enamel when using different flowable composite resins and the APC Plus system (APC). Study design: One hundred metal tubes were bonded to human third molars, which were randomly divided into five groups: Tetric EvoFlow (TF); Wave mv Flow (W); Transbond Supreme LV (S); Transbond XT (XT); and APC. For each experimental group, half of the specimens were bonded in combination with Transbond XT adhesive. After 72?h, an SBS test was performed using a universal testing machine. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was run for multiple comparison tests and for comparing the mean SBS among the 10 subgroups to evaluate the effect of both the composite and the adhesive factors. Then, a Student-Newman-Keuls test was used for pairwise comparisons using the highest mean SBS group as reference. Adhesive Remnant Index scores were determined for the teeth after failure and compared by χ ²-test. Two representative molar surfaces from the 10 subgroups were assessed under scanning electron microscope. Results: The application of adhesive did not have a significant effect, but there was a marked tendency toward the influence of the factor composite on SBS. The mean SBS of tubes bonded with XT with adhesive was significantly higher than that of those bonded with APC with adhesive, TF with and without adhesive, and S with adhesive. Conclusion: Flowable composites and the APC system without intermediate bonding resin could be conveniently applied for orthodontic tube bonding.     

Evaluation of different desensitizing agents effect on shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin

Desensitizing agents can inhibit the bonding strength between dentin and adhesive resin cement. This study evaluated the effects of different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin. Sixty freshly extracted and caries free teeth were classified into five experimental groups, randomly (n?=?12). Each group was treated with a different desensitizing agent (Teethmate, Shield Force Plus, Admira Protect and Ultra-Ez) respectively, except for an untreated control group. After desensitizing agents and adhesive resin cement were applied to each dentin surface, all specimens were stored in incubator at 37?°C for 24?h. The shear bond strength was tested with a Universal testing machine at a 0.5?mm/min crosshead speed. Data were analysed by using a statistical software (SPSS 22). The results of the measurements were analysed by Kruskal Wallis test with Bonferroni correction and multiple comparisons were made by Wilcoxon test (p???.01). Specimens were examined by a scanning electron microscope, additionally. The Shield Force Plus showed significantly the highest shear bond strength compared with other groups (p?<?.01). Ultra-Ez showed the lowest shear bond strength (p?>?.01). There was no significant difference among Teethmate and Admira Protect groups (p?>?.01). Desensitizing agents containing resin monomers increased the bonding strength, however desensitizers containing calcium phosphate, potassium nitrate and fluoride did not effect the bonding strength of resin cement to dentin.     

Effect of thermal cycling on micro-tensile bond strength of composite restorations bonded with multimode adhesive

Objective: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of thermal cycling on the micro-tensile bond strength (Mtbs) of multimode adhesive agents. Materials and methods: Eight freshly extracted caries-free human third molars were used. The flat dentin surfaces were prepared and polished with 600-grit SiC abrasive paper for standard smear layer formation. The teeth were restored using Single Bond Universal Adhesive [(total etch (G1, G2)/self etch (G3, G4)]?+?Filtek Z550 and All-Bond Universal Adhesive [(total etch (G5, G6)/self etch (G7, G8)]?+?Aelite all-purpose. The specimens in groups G1, G3, G5, and G7 were subjected to thermal cycling (1000 cycles at 5–55 °C, for a 30?s dwell time), while the specimens in other groups were not exposed to an aging procedure. The Mtbs test was determined in all procedures. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and post hoc tests. The significance level was set at?=?0.05. Results: Group five was highly affected by the thermal cycling following the total etch procedure, while group one was not significantly affected. Group seven was highly affected by thermal cycling, while group three was not significantly affected after the self etch procedure. Group eight exhibited a higher mean Mtbs value after the thermal cycling procedure. Conclusion: The bond strength of multimode (universal) adhesives was found to be material dependent. The total etch procedure showed a higher Mtbs value than the self etch procedure.     

Bond strength and durability of universal adhesive agents with lithium disilicate ceramics: A shear bond strength study

The aim was to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of lithium disilicate (LD) ceramic to resin composite with different universal adhesives, duration of ageing and silane. One hundred and twenty LD ceramic discs were processed, fired and etched (HF acid 5%) for 20 s (sec). All specimens were divided into 12 groups (n = 10), based on different combinations of, 3 different universal adhesives [Scotchbond (SB) Universal Adhesive, All-Bond (AB) Universal, and Futurabond U (FU)], silane and different duration of ageing [24 h and 3 months]. Composite resin cylinders (Tetric ceram) (3mm × 2 mm) were formed using bonding jig on ceramic and were light-cured. The specimens in groups 1–6 and 7–12 were stored in distilled water (37 °C) for 24 h and 3 months (thermocycling -5000 cycles 5–55 °C/30 s dwell time) before being subjected to bond strength testing respectively. Using universal testing machine shear bond test was performed at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Failure modes and fracture patterns were assessed using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. Analysis of variance was performed to analyze data. SBS was significantly higher with silane than without silane (p < 0.01), regardless of the type of adhesive or storage duration. Specimens tested at 24 h storage showed significantly higher (p < 0.01) SBS than specimens tested after 3-months. A comparison among different universal adhesives showed significantly distinct bond strength (p < 0.01). Optimal bonds to LD were achieved by application of silane. While ageing through storage had a negative impact on the SBS, it varied among different adhesives.     

Bonding effectiveness of different dentin conditions on etch-and-rinse mode of two universal adhesives: the confocal laser scanning and shear bond strength

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength and the morphological differences of adhesive/dentin interface of two one-step universal adhesives to dentin using different dentin-conditioning methods with etch-and-rinse mode. Ninety-six dentin specimens were randomly divided into two groups based on application of two adhesives and assigned to three subgroups according to different dentin conditioning (wet-bonding; air-dried; rewetting). After etching and rinsing, experimental dentin conditioning was conducted on the etched dentin specimens. All specimens were subjected to shear bond strength testing using a universal testing machine, and all data were statistically analyzed using two- way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post hoc test. All debonded specimens were examined for fracture pattern by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Adjunctively, one specimen per group was prepared by the same processing and longitudinally sectioned. Then, the infiltration ability of adhesives into dentin was examined by observing the interface using confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM). Wet and Rewet groups exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength than dry groups on the etch-and-rinse system, regardless of different adhesives. The bond strength between wet and rewet groups showed no significant difference in Tukey’s test. Analysis of failure surface using SEM showed that predominant failure patterns were mixed in both the wet-bonding group and dry-bonding group. CLSM presented that resin penetration into etched dentin was enhanced similarly in wet and rewet group. Application of rewetting agents on dried dentin increased the bonding performance of universal adhesives on etch-and-rinse mode.     

Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite

Purpose: To evaluate the wetting ability and the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems in various depths of dentin. Materials and Method: 48 extracted human molars cut in half in buccolingual direction. Buccal and lingual surfaces were used to obtain deep (n = 48) and superficial (n = 48) dentin. Groups were divided into 4 subgroups: Self-etch (CSE), etch&rinse (SB), multi-mode self-etch (SAU) and multimode etch&rinse (EAU) adhesive systems. 3 consecutive contact-angle measurements were obtained: T0- 3 μl drop of distilled water on dentin; T1-Droplet of the adhesive; T2- Distilled water after polymerization of the adhesive. After composite build-ups, microtensile measurements were performed. Contact angle data were analysed with analysis of variance for repeated measures. Bond strength data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance, comparisons were made according to the logarithmic values (p < 0.05). Results: The difference between groups was not significant regardless of dentin depth for all measurements (p < 0.05). All groups except CSE enhanced the wetting ability of the adhesive but reduced the wetting ability of distilled water after application of the adhesive (p < 0.05). Regarding adhesive systems, the groups showed no significant difference between bond strengths to various depths of dentin except SAU (p > 0.05); in SAU, bond strength to deep dentine were significantly higher than superficial dentin (p < 0.05). Regarding adhesives’ bond strength, CSE showed significantly greater values than the other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The cavity depth does not affect the bonding ability for all adhesive systems; self-etch adhesive systems might be a better choice since different adhesives may influence the wetting ability and microtensile bond strength of the dentin substrates.     

Bond strength of repaired composite resins: surface treatments,adhesive systems,and composite type

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of three different surface treatments and two different adhesives on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of repaired composites using the same or different type of resin. Twenty-four nano-hybrid (Ceram X mono-C) and 24 nanofilled (Filtek Ultimate-F) composite discs were prepared. The specimens were aged with 5000 thermocycles and randomly divided into groups according to the surface treatment methods: (a) phosphoric acid (b) Er:YAG laser and (c) aluminum trioxide particle (air abrasion). Fresh composite resins (C and F) were added to the treated surfaces with two different adhesives (two-step and one-step self-etch adhesives). Then, the specimens were aged again. The stick-shaped specimens were prepared from the discs (n = 25) and the sticks were subjected to the μTBS test. Results indicated that significant differences were found in μTBS values among the surface treatment methods. In the C groups, the highest μTBS value (41.3 ± 8.3 MPa) was recorded in the air abrasion and one-step self-etch adhesive group, which were repaired with the same kind of composite. In the F groups, the highest μTBS value was observed in the air abrasion and one-step self-etch adhesive (37.6 ± 12.3 MPa) group. The treatment with air abrasion is more effective than the others, and it may be suggested for composite repair.     

Effect of different adhesive protocols on bond strength between composite resins for indirect use and repair materials

Abstract

The aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of different adhesive protocols on the bond strength (SBS) of composite resin for indirect use to repairs of bulk-fill or conventional nanoparticulated composites. Forty-eight cylindrical specimens of composite resin for indirect use were prepared, aged, and randomly divided into four groups (n?=?12), a control group without any adhesion protocol, and three experimental groups: Silane?+?Scotch Bond Multipurpose adhesive (S?+?SBMP), Tetric N Bond Universal (TBU), and Single Bond Universal (SBU). The treated surfaces were restored using two different composite resins: Filtek Bulk-Fill or Filtek Z350XT. Then, the specimens were submitted to the SBS test, and the resultant data were analyzed with ANOVA on ranks test and Tukey’s test (α?=?0.05). There were no significant differences between the two types of resins used as repair material. For both resins, the groups treated with S?+?SBMP obtained the highest values (p?<?0.001). Groups TBU and SBU did not have statistically significant differences between them. Pre-treatment with a silane coupling agent and a layer of a hydrophobic adhesive can improve the bond strength of repairs performed on a composite resin for indirect use.     

The bonding effect of adhesive systems and bulk-fill composites to sound and caries-affected dentine

Purpose: To investigate the influence of adhesive type and increment thickness on shear bond strength of flowable bulk-fill resin composites compared with a flowable conventional resin composite, in both sound and caries-affected dentine.

Methods: Shear bond strength was tested in 100 extracted human molars with coronal dentine caries. Half of the teeth were restored with Adper? Easy Bond and the other half with Adper? Single Bond Plus. Bonded surfaces were restored with Filtek? Ultimate Flow and two bulk-fill composites (SDR and X-tra base) (n = 10 teeth for each subgroup). Restorations of 4 mm were performed with incremental or bulk-fill technique. The shear bond was determined and statistically analysed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc tests (p ≤ 0.05). Dentine–resin interfaces were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy.

Results: For both adhesives, the highest shear bond strength values were obtained for sound dentine. In sound dentine, the highest bond strength observed with Easy Bond when used in 2-mm increments of SDR. In caries-affected dentine, Single Bond in combination with SDR displayed significantly lower bond strength.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the incremental and bulk-fill groups for molars with sound dentine when the etch-and-rinse adhesive system was used; however, for the self-etch adhesive system, incremental application caused higher bond strength than bulk application.     

The effects of universal adhesive and innovative fabrication techniques of metal-ceramic restorations on repair strength of porcelain fracture with metal exposure

This study was to evaluate the effects of universal adhesive and innovative fabrication techniques of Cobalt-Chromium (Co-Cr) alloys on shear bond strength (SBS) between the repair material. One hundred forty-four Co-Cr alloys specimens were fabricated by casting (C), milling (M), direct process powder-bed method (CL), and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) (EL). Each group was then divided randomly into three groups, according to the chemical agent used: alloy primer (Z), universal adhesive (A), or both (AZ). The composite resin cylinders were built on metal specimens. SBSs were determined after water storage and thermocycling, and data were statistically analyzed. The method used for the fabrication of Co-Cr alloy had a significant effect on bond strength (p?=?0.016). AZ (12.077?±?0.575?MPa) groups showed highest SBS values. Co-Cr alloys fabricated with DMLS method have a superior repair capacity. The universal adhesive increased the repair strength when applied with an alloy primer.     

Effect of hot-etching treatment on shear bond strength of zirconia to resin cement

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of hot-etching surface treatment on the shear bond strength between zirconia ceramics and resin cement. Ceramic cylinders were divided randomly into 10 groups (n?=?10) according to different surface treatments (blank control; airborne particle abrasion; hot-etching for 10?min; hot-etching for 30?min; hot-etching for 60?min) and whether or not performed thermal cycling fatigue test. Flat enamel surfaces, were prepared from human permanent incisors and were bonded to the zirconia discs. All specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test by a universal testing machine. All data were statistically analysed using one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparison least significant difference tests (α?=?0.05). Hot-etching for 60?min treatment produced higher bond strengths than the other treatment. Surface treatment of zirconia with a hot-etching solution might enhance surface roughness and bond strength between zirconia and resin cement.     

Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength using different cementing agents in molar and premolar attachments

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets and tubes to acid-etched human enamel when using different cementing agents. Study Design: One hundred and sixty metal attachments (80 tubes and 80 brackets) were bonded to human third molars and premolars that were randomly divided into identical groups of four: Transbond XT (XT); Wave MV Flow (WF); APC Plus System (APC); and Fuji Ortho LC (LC). For each experimental group, half of the specimens were bonded in combination with Transbond XT adhesive. After 72?h, a SBS test was performed using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc comparisons, χ² tests, and linear regression modeling. Adhesive remnant index scores were determined for the teeth after failure. Representative tooth surfaces from each subgroup were assessed under SEM. Results: Considering that each cement was observed, each of them showed similar SBS when the adhesive system was applied as when the adhesive was not applied. By comparing all cements together, it was noted that if an adhesive is not applied, all cements have similar values. If an adhesive is applied, cement XT, WF, and APC showed significantly higher SBS values than LC did. The tubes showed higher SBS than the brackets did in cements XT and WF with or without an adhesive, as well as APC Plus with an adhesive. Conclusions: The use of an adhesive system in bonding brackets and tubes does not influence the SBS obtained, independently of the cement.