Assessment of insulin sensitivity and secretion with the labelled intravenous glucose tolerance test: improved modelling analysis

A new modelling analysis was developed to assess insulin sensitivity with a tracer-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). IVGTTs were performed in 5 normal (NGT) and 7 non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) subjects. A 300 mg/kg glucose bolus containing [6,6-(2)H2]glucose was given at time 0. After 20 min, insulin was infused for 5 min (NGT, 0.03; NIDDM, 0.05 U/kg). Concentrations of tracer, glucose, insulin and C-peptide were measured for 240 min. A circulatory model for glucose kinetics was used. Glucose clearance was assumed to depend linearly on plasma insulin concentration delayed. Model parameters were: basal glucose clearance (Cl(b)), glucose clearance at 600 pmol/l insulin concentration (Cl600), basal glucose production (Pb), basal insulin sensitivity index (BSI = Cl(b)/basal insulin concentration); incremental insulin sensitivity index (ISI = slope of the relationship between insulin concentration and glucose clearance). Insulin secretion was calculated by deconvolution of C-peptide data. Indices of basal pancreatic sensitivity (PSIb) and first (PSI1) and second-phase (PSI2) sensitivity were calculated by normalizing insulin secretion to the prevailing glucose levels. Diabetic subjects were found to be insulin resistant (BSI: 2.3 +/- 0.6 vs 0.76 +/- 0.18 ml x min(-1) x m(-2) x pmol/l(-1), p < 0.02; ISI: 0.40 +/- 0.06 vs 0.13 +/- 0.05 ml x min(-1) x m(-2) x pmol/l(-1), p < 0.02; Cl600: 333 +/- 47 vs 137 +/- 26 ml x min(-1) x m(-2), p < 0.01; NGT vs NIDDM). Pb was not elevated in NIDDM (588 +/- 169 vs 606 +/- 123 micromol x min(-1) x m(-2), NGT vs NIDDM). Hepatic insulin resistance was however present as basal glucose and insulin were higher. PSI1 was impaired in NIDDM (67 +/- 15 vs 12 +/- 7 pmol x min x m(-2) x mmol/l(-1), p < 0.02; NGT vs NIDDM). In NGT and in a subset of NIDDM subjects (n = 4), PSIb was inversely correlated with BSI (r = 0.95, p < 0.0001, log transformation). This suggests the existence of a compensatory mechanism that increases pancreatic sensitivity in the presence of insulin resistance, which is normal in some NIDDM subjects and impaired in others. In conclusion, using a simple test the present analysis provides a rich set of parameters characterizing glucose metabolism and insulin secretion, agrees with the literature, and provides some new information on the relationship between insulin sensitivity and secretion.     

The effect of acarbose on insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, on postprandial plasma glucose and insulin and insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with IGT were randomly treated in a double-blind fashion with placebo (n = 10) or acarbose (n = 8) at 100 mg t.i.d. for 4 months. All subjects were submitted before randomization and at the end of the study to a standardized breakfast and a 12-h daytime plasma glucose and plasma insulin profile, and insulin sensitivity was measured as steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) using the insulin suppression test. RESULTS: While placebo had no effect on postprandial plasma glucose and plasma insulin incremental area under the curve (AUC) (3.03 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.76 +/- 0.6 mmol.h-1.l-1, P = NS; 1,488 +/- 229 vs. 1,609 +/- 253 pmol.h-1.l-1, P = NS), acarbose resulted in a significant reduction for both glucose (1.44 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.45 +/- 0.9 mmol.h-1.l-1, P = 0.002) and insulin (626.7 +/- 104.3 vs. 1,338.3 +/- 220.5 pmol.h-1.l-1, P = 0.003). The reduction in 12-h plasma glucose and insulin AUC on acarbose (11.2 +/- 2.1 mmol.h-1.l-1 and 7.5 +/- 0.7 nmol.h-1.l-1) was significantly greater than that on placebo (4.0 +/- 1.6 mmol.h-1.l-1 and 0.8 +/- 0.4 nmol.h-1.l-1) (P = 0.014 and 0.041). While SSPG was not affected by placebo (13.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 13.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; P = NS), it was significantly improved by acarbose (10.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 13.1 +/- 1.5 mmol/l, P < 0.004) and was also significantly different from placebo at 4 months (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that in subjects with IGT, acarbose treatment decreases postprandial plasma glucose and insulin and improves insulin sensitivity. Acarbose may therefore be potentially useful to prevent the progression of IGT to NIDDM.     

Glucagon-like peptide 1 improves the ability of the beta-cell to sense and respond to glucose in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and NIDDM are both associated with an impaired ability of the beta-cell to sense and respond to small changes in plasma glucose concentrations. The aim of this study was to establish if glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), a natural enteric peptide and potent insulin secretagogue, improves this defect. Two weight-matched groups, one with eight subjects having IGT (2-h glucose, 10.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) and another with seven subjects with diet-treated NIDDM (2-h glucose, 14.5 +/- 0.9 mmol/l), were studied on two occasions during a 12-h oscillatory glucose infusion, a sensitive test of the ability of the beta-cell to sense and respond to glucose. Glucose was infused with a mean rate of 4 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1), amplitude 33% above and below the mean rate, and periodicity of 144 min, with infusion of saline or GLP-1 at 0.4 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 12 h. Mean glucose levels were significantly lower in both groups during the GLP-1 infusion compared with during saline infusion: 9.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/l in the IGT subjects (P < 0.0004) and 14.6 +/- 1.0 vs. 9.3 +/- 0.7 mmol/l in NIDDM subjects (P < 0.0002). Despite this significant reduction in plasma glucose concentration, insulin secretion rates (ISRs) increased significantly in IGT subjects (513.3 +/- 77.6 vs. 583.1 +/- 100.7 pmol/min; P < 0.03), with a trend toward increasing in NIDDM subjects (561.7 +/- 122.16 vs. 642.8 +/- 128 pmol/min; P = 0.1). These results were compatible with enhanced insulin secretion in the presence of GLP-1. Spectral power was used as a measure of the ability of the beta-cell to secrete insulin in response to small changes in the plasma glucose concentration during the oscillatory infusion. Spectral power for ISR increased from 2.1 +/- 0.9 during saline infusion to 7.4 +/- 1.3 during GLP-1 infusion in IGT subjects (P < 0.004), but was unchanged in NIDDM subjects (1.0 +/- 0.4 to 1.5 +/- 0.6; P = 0.3). We concluded that low dosage GLP-1 improves the ability of the beta-cell to secrete insulin in both IGT and NIDDM subjects, but that the ability to sense and respond to subtle changes in plasma glucose is improved in IGT subjects, with only a variable response in NIDDM subjects. Beta-cell dysfunction was improved by GLP-1 infusion, suggesting that early GLP-1 therapy may preserve beta-cell function in subjects with IGT or mild NIDDM.     

Pharmacoeconomic model of enoxaparin versus heparin for prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement

Non-diabetic first degree relatives of non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) families are at increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus, and have been studied to identify early metabolic abnormalities. Hormone concentrations measured by specific enzyme immunoassays were assessed in non-diabetic relatives of North European extraction, and control subjects with no family history of diabetes were matched for age, sex and ethnicity. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was conducted and those with newly diagnosed NIDDM were excluded. Basal insulin resistance was determined by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), and hepatic insulin clearance by C-peptide:insulin molar ratio. Relatives (n = 150) were heavier (BMI: p < 0.0001) than the control subjects (n = 152), and had an increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (15 vs 3%, p < 0.01). The relatives had increased fasting proinsulin levels and decreased C-peptide levels following the glucose load, while insulin levels were increased at all time points. To examine whether the differences in hormone levels were secondary to the differences in glucose tolerance and adiposity, we studied 100 normal glucose tolerant relatives and control subjects pair-matched for age, sex, waist-hip ratio and BMI. The differences in proinsulin levels were no longer apparent. However, the relatives remained more insulin resistant, and had decreased C-peptide levels and C-peptide:insulin ratios at all time points. In conclusion, we have identified several metabolic abnormalities in the normal glucose tolerant relatives, and propose that the decreased hepatic insulin clearance helps to maintain normoglycaemia in the face of combined insulin resistance and decreased insulin secretion.     

Psychological and socio-medical aspects of HIV/AIDS: a reflection on publications in AIDS care (1989-1995)

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and first degree relatives of such patients are at increased risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The aim of the present study was to determine whether lipid abnormalities occur in normoglycaemic relatives of non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. Cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A-I and apolipoprotein B concentrations were measured in serum; the lipoprotein fractions very low density, intermediate density, low density and high density lipoprotein were prepared by sequential flotation ultracentrifugation and their composition investigated. The groups were matched for age, sex and blood glucose concentrations although the relatives (n = 126) were more insulin resistant as determined using the homeostasis model assessment method [1.9 (0.8-9.0) vs 1.6 (0.4-4.9) mmol/mU per l (mean [95% confidence intervals]); p < 0.001] and had greater body mass indices [26.6 (4.1) vs 24.8 (3.9) (mean [S.D.]); p = 0.001] than control subjects (n = 126). Relatives had higher serum apolipoprotein B concentrations than control subjects [0.9 (0.3) vs 0.8 (0.3) g/l, p = 0.02) and lower serum apolipoprotein A-I concentrations (1.4 (0.3) vs 1.5 (0.3), p = 0.02). In multivariate linear regression analysis of all subjects log insulin resistance (p = 0.0001), age (p = 0.002) and waist:hip ratio (p = 0.01) were independent predicators of apolipoprotein B concentrations while waist:hip ratio (p < 0.001) and smoking status (p = 0.002) were independent predictors of apolipoprotein A-I concentrations. Lipoprotein composition (measured in a subgroup of 76 control subjects and 88 relatives), serum cholesterol and serum triglyceride concentrations did not differ between the groups. We conclude that atherogenic apolipoprotein abnormalities occur in normoglycaemic relatives of non-insulin dependent diabetic patients.     

Alterations in glucose metabolism in the elderly patient with diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To determine the alterations in glucose metabolism in elderly patients with NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 9 healthy elderly control subjects (73 +/- 1 yr of age; body mass index 25.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m2) and 9 untreated elderly NIDDM patients (72 +/- 2 yr of age; BMI 25.9 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). Each subject underwent a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (40 g/m2); a 2-h hyperglycemic glucose clamp study (glucose 5.4 mM above basal); and a 4-h euglycemic insulin clamp (40 mM.m2.min-1). Tritiated glucose methodology was used to measure glucose production and disposal rates during the euglycemic clamp. RESULTS: Patients with NIDDM had a higher fasting glucose (9.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.1 +/- 0.1 mM in control subjects vs. NIDDM patients, respectively, P < 0.001) and a greater area under the curve for glucose during the OGTT (16.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 6.7 +/- 0.3 mM in control subjects vs. NIDDM patients, respectively, P < 0.01) than the healthy control subjects. During the hyperglycemic clamp, patients with NIDDM had an absent first-phase insulin response (112 +/- 6 vs. 250 +/- 31 pM in control subjects vs. NIDDM patients, respectively, P < 0.01), and a blunted second-phase insulin response (159 +/- 11 vs. 337 +/- 46 pM in control subjects vs. NIDDM patients, respectively, P < 0.01). Before the euglycemic clamp, fasting insulin (99 +/- 5 vs. 111 +/- 10 pM in control subjects vs. NIDDM patients, respectively) and hepatic glucose production (11.8 +/- 0.7 vs. 11.5 +/- 0.5 mumol.kg-1-min-1 in control subjects vs. NIDDM patients, respectively) were similar. Steady-state (180-240 min) glucose disposal rates during the euglycemic clamp were slightly, but not significantly, higher in the normal control subjects (36.5 +/- 1.1 vs. 33.1 +/- 1.9 mumol.kg-1-min-1 in control subjects vs. NIDDM patients, respectively, NS). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that NIDDM in nonobese elderly subjects is characterized by a marked impairment in insulin release. This may be attributable to the toxic effects of chronic hyperglycemia on the beta-cell. When compared with age-matched control subjects, the NIDDM patients showed no increase in fasting insulin or hepatic glucose production, and insulin resistance was mild.     

Outcome of post-term pregnancy: a matched-pair case-control study

Insulin resistance is a feature of non-diabetic relatives of non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) families. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) expression is linked with insulin resistance, and is under strong genetic control. We examined the relationship between insulin resistance and two polymorphisms of the TNF alpha promoter region (positions -238 and -308). Non-diabetic relatives (n = 123) of NIDDM families and control subjects (n = 126) with no family history of diabetes were studied. Insulin resistance was determined by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and short insulin tolerance test (ITT), and genotyping was by restriction digest. The -238 polymorphism (TNFA-A allele) was carried by 14 relatives and 11 control subjects, and all were heterozygotes. To examine the relationship between the -238 polymorphism and insulin resistance independent of potentially confounding factors, the relatives with the TNFA-A allele were individually pair-matched for age, sex, waist-hip ratio, body mass index, and glucose tolerance with relatives homozygous for the wild-type allele. Relatives with the TNFA-A allele had decreased insulin resistance (HOMA index: 2.0, 3.6 +/- 2.1 [means +/- SD of differences], p = 0.03), and this was true for comparable pair-matched control subjects (HOMA index: 1.1, 1.9 +/- 0.8, p = 0.01). Combining relative (n = 7) and control (n = 4) pairs that had undergone an ITT, subjects with the TNFA-A allele had an increased K(ITT) (3.8, 3.0 +/- 1.0%/min, p = 0.04) similarly indicating decreased insulin resistance. There was no significant relationship between the -308 polymorphism and insulin resistance. We conclude that the TNFA-A allele is associated with decreased insulin resistance as assessed by two independent methods, and may protect against the future development of NIDDM in susceptible individuals.     

Characterization of adrenocortical cell lines produced by genetically targeted tumorigenesis in transgenic mice

Microvascular hyperaemia is decreased in subjects at risk of developing non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who have fasting hyperglycaemia. Such microvascular abnormalities may be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic microangiopathy. To investigate the relationship of reduced microvascular hyperaemia to metabolic and blood pressure abnormalities associated with the prediabetic state, we studied 24 subjects with fasting hyperglycaemia and 24 age- and sex-matched control subjects. The microvascular hyperaemic response to local heating of the skin on the dorsum of the foot measured by laser Doppler fluximetry was reduced in the subjects with fasting hyperglycaemia (1.18 [0.87-1.83] volts vs 1.51 [1.30-2.14] volts normal subjects; p = 0.0002) and was negatively correlated with fasting plasma insulin concentration (Rs = 0.70; p = 0.001) and positively related to insulin sensitivity determined by continuous infusion of glucose with model assessment (CIGMA) (Rs = 0.52; p = 0.01), but showed no association with fasting plasma glucose, beta-cell function 24 h ambulatory blood pressure profiles or serum lipid concentrations. These results suggests that hyperinsulinaemia, as a result of insulin resistance, may have a detrimental effect on microvascular function in the prediabetic state.     

Glucagon-like peptide I enhances the insulinotropic effect of glibenclamide in NIDDM patients and in the perfused rat pancreas

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the acute effects of glibenclamide and glucagon-like peptide I (GLP-I) and their combination in perfused isolated rat pancreas and in patients with secondary failure to sulfonylureas. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Rat islets were perfused with 10 nmol/l GLP-I in combination with 2 mumol/l glibenclamide. In human experiments, GLP-I (0.75 pmol. kg-1.min-1) was given as a continuous infusion during 240 min, while glibenclamide (3.5 mg) was administered orally. Eight patients participated in the study (age 57.6 +/- 2.7 years, BMI 28.7 +/- 1.5 kg/m2, mean +/- SE). In all subjects, blood glucose was first normalized by insulin infusion administered by an artificial pancreas (Biostator). RESULTS: GLP-I increased the insulinotropic effect of glibenclamide fourfold in the perfused rat pancreas. In human experiments, treatment with GLP-I alone and in combination with glibenclamide significantly decreased basal glucose levels (5.1 +/- 0.4 and 4.5 +/- 0.1 vs. 6.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P < 0.01), while with only glibenclamide, glucose concentrations remained unchanged. GLP-I markedly decreased total integrated glucose response to the meal (353 +/- 60 vs. 724 +/- 91 mmol.l-1. min-1, area under the curve [AUC] [-30-180 min], P < 0.02), whereas glibenclamide had no effect (598 +/- 101 mmol.l-1. min-1, AUC [-30-180 min], NS). The combined treatment further enhanced the glucose lowering effect of GLP-I (138 +/- 24 mmol. l-1.min, AUC [-30-180 min], P < 0.001). GLP-I, glibenclamide, and combined treat-stimulated meal-induced insulin release as reflected by insulinogenic indexes (control 1.44 +/- 0.4; GLP-I 6.3 +/- 1.6, P < 0.01; glibenclamide 6.8 +/- 2.1, P < 0.01; combination 20.7 +/- 5.0, P < 0.001). GLP-I inhibited basal but not postprandial glucagon responses. Using paracetamol as a marker for gastric emptying rate of the test meal, treatment with GLP-I decreased gastric emptying at 180 min by approximately 50% compared with the control subjects (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In acute experiments on overweight patients with NIDDM, GLP-I exerted a marked antidiabetogenic action on the basal and postprandial state. The peptide stimulated insulin, suppressed basal glucagon release, and prolonged gastric emptying. The glucose-lowering effect of GLP-I was further enhanced by glibenclamide. This action may be at least partially accounted for by a synergistic effect of these two compounds on insulin release. Glibenclamide per se enhanced postprandial but not basal insulin release and exerted a less pronounced antidiabetogenic effect compared with GLP-I.     

Neural network subtyping of depression

OBJECTIVE: To examine the mechanisms by which weight loss improves glycemic control in overweight subjects with NIDDM, particularly the relationships between energy restriction, improvement in insulin sensitivity, and regional and overall adipose tissue loss. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Hyperinsulinemic glucose clamps were performed in 20 subjects (BMI = 32.0 +/- 0.5 [SEM] kg/m2, age = 48.4 +/- 2.7 years) with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 10) or mild NIDDM (n = 10) before and on the 4th (d4) and 28th (d28) days of a reduced-energy (1,100 +/- 250 [SD] kcal/day) formula diet. Body composition changes were assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and insulin secretory changes were measured by insulin response to intravenous glucose before and after weight loss. RESULTS: In both groups, energy restriction (d4) reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (delta FPG: NGT = -0.4 +/- 0.2 mmol/l and NIDDM = -1.1 +/- 0.03 mmol/l, P = 0.002), which was independently related to reduced carbohydrate intake (partial r = 0.64, P = 0.003). There was a marked d4 increase in percent of insulin suppression of hepatic glucose output (HGO) in both groups (delta HGO suppression: NGT = 28 +/- 15% and NIDDM = 32 +/- 8%, P = 0.002). By d28, with 6.3 +/- 0.4 kg weight loss, FPG was further reduced (d4 vs. d28) in NIDDM only (P = 0.05), and insulin sensitivity increased in both groups (P = 0.02). Only loss of abdominal fat related to improvements in FPG (r = 0.51, P = 0.03) and insulin sensitivity after weight loss (r = 0.48, P = 0.05). In contrast to insulin action, there were only small changes in insulin secretion. CONCLUSIONS: Both energy restriction and weight loss have beneficial effects on insulin action and glycemic control in obesity and mild NIDDM. The effect of energy restriction is related to changes in individual macronutrients, whereas weight loss effects relate to changes in abdominal fat.     

Forearm substrate exchange during hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia in normal man

To assess muscle substrate exchange during hypoglycaemia, 8 healthy young male subjects were studied twice during 2 h of hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemia followed by 4 h of (1) hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose < 2.8 mmol l-1), and (2) euglycaemia. Insulin was infused at a rate of 1.5 mU kg-1 min-1 throughout. When compared to euglycaemia, hypoglycaemia was associated with: (1) increment in circulating glucagon (65 +/- 8 vs 23 +/- 4 ng l-1, p < 0.05), growth hormone (19.9 +/- 3.6 vs 2.6 +/- 1.3 micrograms l-1, p < 0.05), adrenaline (410 +/- 88 vs 126 +/- 32 ng l-1, p < 0.05) and increased suppression of C-peptide (0.5 +/- 0.1 vs 1.0 +/- 0.1 micrograms l-1, p < 0.05) along with a modest lowering of insulin (103 +/- 10 vs 130 +/- 13 mU l-1, p < 0.05); (b) decrease in plasma glucose level (3.0 +/- 0.07 vs 5.0 +/- 0.12 mmol l-1, p < 0.05), forearm glucose uptake (0.21 +/- 0.09 vs 1.21 +/- 0.21 mmol l-1, p < 0.05) and requirement for exogenous glucose (5.6 +/- 1.1 vs 13.2 +/- 0.9 mg kg-1 min-1 p < 0.005) together with an impaired suppression of isotopically determined endogenous glucose production (0.34 +/- 0.5 vs -2.3 +/- 0.3 mg kg-1 min-1, p < 0.05); (3) exaggerated increase in blood lactate (1680 +/- 171 vs 1315 +/- 108 mumol l-1, p < 0.05) and a decrease in alanine (215 +/- 18 vs 262 +/- 19 mumol l-1, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Insulin resistance versus insulin deficiency in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: problems and prospects

A definitive assessment of the relative roles of insulin resistance and insulin deficiency in the etiology of NIDDM is hampered by several problems. 1) Due to better methodology, data on insulin resistance are generally more accurate and consistent than data on insulin deficiency. 2) In source data, case-control studies are prone to selection bias, while epidemiological associations, whether cross-sectional or longitudinal, are liable to misinterpretation. 3) Insulin secretion and action are physiologically interconnected at multiple levels, so that an initial defect in either is likely to lead with time to a deficit in the companion function. The fact that both insulin resistance and impaired insulin release have been found to precede and predict NIDDM in prospective studies may be in part a reflection of just such relatedness. 4) Direct genetic analysis is effective in rarer forms of glucose intolerance (MODY, mitochondrial mutations, etc.) but encounters serious difficulties with typical late-onset NIDDM. Despite these uncertainties, the weight of current evidence supports the view that insulin resistance is very important in the etiology of typical NIDDM for the following reasons: 1) it is found in the majority of patients with the manifest disease; 2) it is only partially reversible by any form of treatment (117); 3) it can be traced back through earlier stages of IGT and high-risk conditions; and 4) it predicts subsequent development of the disease with remarkable consistency in both prediabetic and normoglycemic states. Of conceptual importance is also the fact that the key cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle insulin resistance (defective stimulation of glucose transport, phosphorylation, and storage into glycogen) have been confirmed in NIDDM subjects by a variety of in vivo techniques [ranging from catheter balance (118) to multiple tracer kinetics (119) to 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (120)], and have been detected also in normoglycemic NIDDM offspring (121). If insulin resistance is a characteristic finding in many cases of NIDDM, insulin-sensitive NIDDM does exist. On the other hand, given the tight homeostatic control of plasma glucose levels in humans, beta-cell dysfunction, relative or absolute, is a sine qua non for the development of diabetes. If insulin deficiency must be present whereas insulin resistance may be present, is this proof that the former is etiologically primary to the latter? If so, do we have convincing evidence that the primacy of insulin deficiency is genetic in nature? The answer to both questions is negative on several accounts. The defect in insulin secretion in overt NIDDM is functionally severe but anatomically modest: beta-cell mass is reduced by 20-40% in patients with long-standing NIDDM (122). Moreover, the insulin secretory deficit is progressively worse with more severe hyperglycemia (123) and recovers considerably upon improving glycemic control (124). These observations indicate that part of the insulin deficiency is acquired (through glucose toxicity, lipotoxicity, or both). In addition, although insulin deficiency is necessary for diabetes, it may not always be sufficient to cause NIDDM. In fact, subtle defects in the beta-cell response to glucose may be widespread in the population (108, 125) and only cause frank hyperglycemia when obesity/insulin resistance stress the secretory machinery. Conceivably, there could be beta-cell dysfunction without NIDDM just as there is insulin resistance without diabetes. Incidentally, any defect in insulin secretion, whether in normoglycemic or hyperglycemic persons, could be due to other factors than primary beta-cell dysfunction: amyloid deposits in the pancreas (126), changes in insulin secretagogues (amylin, GLP-1, GIP, galanin) (127-130), early intrauterine malnutrition (131). Finally, the predictive power of early changes in insulin secretion for the development of typical NIDDM is generally lower than that of insulin     

Quantitative, competitive PCR assay for HIV-1 using a microplate-based detection system

OBJECTIVE: Amylin, a secretory peptide of beta-cells, is the constituent peptide of islet amyloid, which is characteristic of NIDDM, and changes in amylin secretion in response to therapies may influence the rate of production of islet amyloid. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether therapy with sulfonylurea or basal insulin in NIDDM would alter amylin secretion in a way that might affect the formation of islet amyloid. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized crossover design, eight subjects with NIDDM underwent three 8-week periods of therapy with diet alone, sulfonylurea, or exogenous basal insulin, with evaluation of amylin, amylin-like peptide (ALP), and glucose and C-peptide concentrations, both during fasting and after a standard breakfast. Changes in beta-cell function (% beta) were assessed, in the basal state by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and in the stimulated state by hyperglycemic clamps. Seven nondiabetic control subjects each underwent a meal profile and hyperglycemic clamp. RESULTS: Both sulfonylurea and insulin therapy reduced basal glucose concentrations compared with diet alone, but neither reduced the increased postprandial glucose increments. Both sulfonylurea and insulin therapy increased basal % beta, assessed by HOMA, but only sulfonylurea increased the second-phase C-peptide responses to the hyperglycemic clamp. Sulfonylurea increased time-averaged mean postprandial amylin and ALP concentrations compared with diet alone (geometric mean [1-SD range] for amylin, 4.9 [2.0-11.8] vs. 3.0 [1.4-6.2] pmol/l, P = 0.003; for ALP, 16.4 [8.5-31.7] vs. 10.1 [4.9-20.8] pmol/l, P = 0.001). Insulin therapy reduced basal ALP concentrations compared with diet alone (2.9 [1.5-5.6] vs. 6.0 [2.6-13.6] pmol/l, P = 0.03), but had no effect on postprandial concentrations of amylin (3.0 [1.3-6.5] pmol/l) or ALP (10.0 [5.5-18.1] pmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: By increasing postprandial concentrations of the constituent peptides of islet amyloid, sulfonylurea therapy might increase the rate of deposition of islet amyloid and thereby accelerate the decline of % beta in NIDDM, compared with diet therapy alone.     

Forearm nitric oxide balance, vascular relaxation, and glucose metabolism in NIDDM patients

Endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular responses were assessed in 10 NIDDM patients and 6 normal subjects with no evidence of atherosclerotic disease. Changes in forearm blood flow and arteriovenous (AV) serum nitrite/nitrate (NO2-/NO3-) concentrations were measured in response to intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine (ACh) (7.5, 15, 30 microg/min, endothelium-dependent response) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (0.3, 3, 10 microg/min, endothelium-independent response). Insulin sensitivity (determined by minimal model intravenous glucose tolerance test) was lower in NIDDM patients (0.82 +/- 0.20 vs. 2.97 +/- 0.29 10(4) min x microU(-1) x ml(-1); P < 0.01). Baseline forearm blood flow (4.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.3 ml x 100 ml(-1) tissue x min(-1); NS), mean blood pressure (100 +/- 4 vs. 92 +/- 4 mmHg; NS), and vascular resistance (21 +/- 1 vs. 21 +/- 1 units; NS), as well as their increments during ACh and SNP, infusion were similar in both groups. No difference existed in baseline NO2-/NO3- concentrations (4.09 +/- 0.33 [NIDDM patients] vs. 5.00 +/- 0.48 micromol/l [control subjects]; NS), their forearm net balance (0.31 +/- 0.08 [NIDDM patients] vs. 0.26 +/- 0.08 micromol/l x 100 ml(-1) tissue x min(-1); NS), and baseline forearm glucose uptake. During ACh infusion, both NO2- and NO3- concentrations and net balance significantly increased in both groups, whereas glucose uptake increased only in control subjects. When data from NIDDM and control groups were pooled together, a correlation was found between the forearm AV NO2- and NO3- differences and blood flow (r = 0.494, P = 0.024). On the contrary, no correlation was evident between NO2- and NO3- concentrations or net balance and insulin sensitivity. In summary, 1) no difference existed in basal and ACh-stimulated NO generation and endothelium-dependent relaxation between uncomplicated NIDDM patients and control subjects; 2) in both NIDDM and control groups, forearm NO2- and NO3- net balance following ACh stimulation was related to changes in the forearm blood flow; and 3) ACh-induced increase in forearm blood flow was associated with an increase in glucose uptake only in control subjects but not in NIDDM patients. In conclusion, our results argue against a role of impaired NO generation and blood flow regulation in determining the insulin resistance of uncomplicated NIDDM patients; rather, it supports an independent insulin regulation of hemodynamic and metabolic effects.     

Localization of Rho GTPase in sea urchin eggs

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies in our laboratory showed that the platelet anti-aggregating effect exerted by insulin, mediated by a nitric oxide (NO)-induced increase of guanosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP), is lost in the insulin-resistant of obesity and obese NIDDM. It is not clear 1) whether the alterations observed in obese NIDDM patients are attributable to the obesity-related insulin resistance or to diabetes per se and 2) whether insulin-resistant states present a normal or a blunted response to NO. This study has been conducted to investigate 1) the platelet sensitivity to insulin in lean NIDDM and 2) the platelet sensitivity to an NO donor, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), in obesity and in both lean and obese NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We determined 1) ADP-induced platelet aggregation and platelet cGMP content in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) obtained from 11 lean NIDDM patients, after a 3-min incubation with insulin (0, 240, 480, 960, 1,920 pmol/l) and 2) ADP-induced platelet aggregation and platelet cGMP content in PRP obtained from 9 obese subjects, 11 lean and 8 obese NIDDM patients, and 18 control subjects, after a 3-min incubation with 0, 20, 40, and 100 mumol/l GTN. RESULTS: Insulin dose-dependently decreased platelet aggregation in lean NIDDM patients (P = 0.0001): with 1,920 pmol/l of insulin, ADP ED50 was 141.5 +/- 6.4% of basal values (P = 0.0001). Furthermore, insulin increased platelet cGMP (P = 0.0001) from 7.5 +/- 0.2 to 21.1 +/- 3.7 pmol/10(9) platelets. These results were similar to those previously described in healthy subjects. GTN reduced platelet aggregation in all the groups (P = 0.0001) at all the concentrations tested (P = 0.0001), but GTN IC50 values were much higher in insulin-resistant patients: 36.3 +/- 5.0 mumol/l in healthy control subjects, 26.0 +/- 6.0 mumol/l in lean NIDDM patients (NS vs. control subjects), 123.6 +/- 24.0 mumol/l in obese subjects (P = 0.0001 vs. control subjects), and 110.1 +/- 19.2 mumol/l in obese NIDDM patients (P = 0.0001 vs. control subjects). GTN dose-dependently increased platelet cGMP in all the groups (P = 0.0001 in control subjects, lean NIDDM patients, and obese subjects; P = 0.04 in obese NIDDM patients). Values reached by obese subjects and obese NIDDM patients, however, were lower than those reached by control subjects (with 100 mumol/l of GTN, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0001, respectively). In healthy control subjects and in obese subjects, the insulin:glucose ratio, used as an indirect measure of insulin sensitivity, was positively correlated to GTN IC50 (r = 0.530, P = 0.008), further suggesting that the sensitivity to NO is reduced in the presence of insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The insulin anti-aggregating effect is preserved in lean NIDDM; platelet sensitivity to GTN in preserved in lean NIDDM but is reduced in the insulin-resistant states of obesity and obese NIDDM. Resistance to nitrates, therefore, could be considered another feature of the insulin-resistance syndrome.     

Association of a polymorphism in the beta 3-adrenergic-receptor gene with features of the insulin resistance syndrome in Finns

BACKGROUND: Because visceral obesity predicts insulin resistance, we studied whether alterations in the gene encoding for the beta 3-adrenergic receptor in visceral fat are associated with insulin resistance. METHODS: We studied the frequency of a cytosine-to-thymidine mutation that results in the replacement of tryptophan by arginine at position 64 (Trp64Arg) of the beta 3-adrenergic receptor by restriction-enzyme digestion with BstOl in 335 subjects from western Finland, 207 of whom were nondiabetic and 128 of whom had non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). We also determined the frequency of the mutation in 156 subjects from southern Finland. Sensitivity to insulin was measured by the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique in 66 randomly selected nondiabetic subjects. RESULTS: In the subjects from western Finland, the frequency of the mutated allele was similar in the nondiabetic subjects and the subjects with NIDDM (12 vs. 11 percent). The mean age of the subjects at the onset of diabetes was lower among those with the mutation than those without it (56 vs. 61 years, P = 0.04). Among the nondiabetic subjects, those with the mutation had a higher ratio of waist to hip circumference (P = 0.02), a greater increase in the serum insulin response after the oral administration of glucose (P = 0.05), a higher diastolic blood pressure (82 vs. 78 mm Hg, P = 0.01), and a lower rate of glucose disposal during the clamp study (5.3 vs. 6.5 mg [29 vs. 36 mumol] per kilogram of body weight per minute; P = 0.04) than the subjects without the mutated allele. In an analysis of sibling pairs, the siblings with the mutation generally had higher waist:hip ratios (P = 0.05) and higher responses of blood glucose and serum insulin after the oral administration of glucose than their siblings without the mutation (P = 0.02 and P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Trp64Arg allele of the beta 3-adrenergic receptor is associated with abdominal obesity and resistance to insulin and may contribute to the early onset of NIDDM:     

History of gestational diabetes leads to distinct metabolic alterations in nondiabetic African-American women with a parental history of type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and positive parental history of type 2 diabetes are predictors of the future development of type 2 diabetes in several populations. However, the relative importance of parental history of diabetes and/or history of GDM as risk factors for the pathogenesis of diabetes in African-Americans remains unknown. Thus, the objectives of the present study were 1) to characterize the glucose homeostatic regulations and 2) to examine the contribution of parental history of type 2 diabetes to the potential metabolic alterations found in nondiabetic African-American women with a history of GDM (HGDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated beta-cell secretion, insulin sensitivity (SI), and glucose-dependent glucose disposal (SG) in 15 glucose-tolerant African-American women with a parental history of type 2 diabetes and prior GDM (HGDM) and 35 women with a parental history of type 2 diabetes but without prior GDM (NHGDM). Fifteen healthy nonobese nondiabetic subjects without a family history of diabetes served as control subjects. Body composition was determined by bioelectrical impedance analyzer, and body fat distribution pattern was determined by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) test was performed in each subject. SI and SG were determined by the minimal model method. RESULTS: The mean age, BMI, percent body fat content, and lean body mass were not different between the subgroups of relatives with and without a history of GDM, but were greater than those of the healthy control subjects. Mean fasting and postchallenge serum glucose levels were slightly but significantly greater in the HGDM versus NHGDM subjects and the healthy control subjects. However, the 2-h glucose levels were greater in the relatives with and without GDM when compared with the healthy control subjects. In contrast, mean postprandial serum insulin responses were significantly lower between t = 30 and 120 min in the HGDM versus NHGDM groups and the healthy control subjects. The mean serum insulin levels were not different in the NHGDM subjects and healthy control subjects. During the FSIGT test, acute first-phase insulin release (t = 0-5 min) was significantly lower in the HGDM versus NHGDM groups and healthy control subjects. Mean SI was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the HGDM versus NHGDM subjects and healthy control subjects (1.87 +/- 0.47 vs. 2.87 +/- 0.35 and 3.09 +/- 0.27 x 10(-4).min-1.[microU/ml]-1, respectively). SG was significantly lower in HGDM than NHGDM subjects and healthy control subjects (2.11 +/- 0.15 vs. 3.25 +/- 0.50 and 2.77 +/- 0.22 x 10(-2).min-1, respectively). Mean glucose effectiveness at zero insulin concentrations (GEZI) was significantly lower in the HGDM subjects when compared with the NHGDM and healthy control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that in African-American women with a parental history of type 2 diabetes and GDM, defects in early-phase beta-cell secretion, as well as a decreased SI, SG, and GEZI, persist when compared with those without GDM. We suggest that African-American women with a positive history of GDM have additional genetic defects that perhaps differ from that conferred by a parental history of diabetes alone. Alternatively, the metabolic and hormonal milieu during GDM may be associated with permanent alterations in beta-cell function, SI, and glucose effectiveness in African-American women. These defects could play a significant role in the development of GDM, and perhaps in the subsequent development of type 2 diabetes, in African-American women.     

Cardiovascular risk factors prior to the development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in persons with impaired glucose tolerance: the Hoorn Study

The aim of the study was to analyze cardiovascular risk factors as predictors for developing non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in people with impaired glucose tolerance. A cross-sectional survey of glucose tolerance was conducted in people, aged 50-74, who were randomly selected from the registry of the middle-sized town Hoorn (The Netherlands). Based on the mean values of two oral glucose tolerance tests, people were classified in glucose tolerance categories according to the WHO criteria. The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range 13-55 months). The cumulative incidence of NIDDM was 34% (95% CI 16.9-45.1). In multiple logistic regression analysis, cardiovascular risk factors at baseline did not predict the conversion from impaired glucose tolerance to NIDDM, in contrast with the two-hour plasma glucose level (odds ratio 3.56, p < 0.001) and the fasting proinsulin level, as one of the determinants of beta-cell dysfunction (Odds ratio 2.1, p < 0.05). The baseline HDL-cholesterol level, one of the components of the insulin resistance syndrome, was associated with the conversion from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance (Odds ratio 1.58, p < 0.05). The results of our study seem to support the hypothesis that conversion from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance depends on insulin resistance and the development of NIDDM from impaired glucose tolerance depends on beta-cell dysfunction.     

Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are associated with multiple abnormalities of lipoprotein subclasses in glucose-tolerant relatives of NIDDM patients. Botnia Study Group

We studied the subclasses of plasma lipoproteins in normolipidemic, glucose-tolerant male relatives of noninsulin dependent diabetic patients (NIDDM), who represented either the lowest (n = 14) or the highest (n = 18) quintiles of fasting plasma insulin. The higher plasma triglyceride level in the high insulin group (1.61 mmol/l vs. 0.87 mmol/l, P < 0.001) was due to multiple differences in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. The concentrations of larger VLDL1, smaller VLDL2 particles, and IDL particles were 3.8-fold, 2.5-fold, and 1.5-fold higher, respectively, in the high insulin group than in the low insulin group (P < 0.01 or less). In addition, hyperinsulinemic subjects had VLDL1, VLDL2, and IDL particles enriched in lipids and poor in protein. The lower plasma HDL cholesterol level in the high insulin group (1.20 mmol/l vs. 1.44 mmol/l, P < 0.01) compared to the low insulin group was a consequence of a 27% reduction of HDL2a concentration (P < 0.05) and a significantly reduced percentage of cholesterol in HDL3a, HDL3b, and HDL3c subclasses. On the other hand, the percentages of triglycerides in HDL2b, HDL2a, HDL3a, and HDL3b subclasses were 76%, 79%, 61%, and 50% higher, respectively, in the high insulin group than in the low insulin group (P < 0.01 or less). In the combined group, the concentration of VLDL1 and VLDL2 correlated positively with the concentrations of LDL2 and LDL3 and negatively with HDL2b and HDL2a subclasses (P < 0.05 or less). In conclusion, normolipidemic, glucose-tolerant but hyperinsulinemic relatives of NIDDM patients have qualitatively similar lipoprotein abnormalities as NIDDM patients. These abnormalities are not observed in insulin-sensitive relatives, suggesting that they develop in concert with insulin resistance.     

NIDDM in the elderly

OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to assess the metabolic alterations in elderly patients with NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy, lean (n = 15; age, 73 +/- 1 years; BMI, 23.8 +/- 0.5 kg/m2), and obese (n = 10; age, 71 +/- 1 years; BMI, 28.9 +/- 1.2 kg/m2) control subjects and lean (n = 10; age, 75 +/- 2 years; BMI, 24.0 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) and obese (n = 23; age, 73 +/- 1 years; BMI, 29.9 +/- 0.7 kg/m2) NIDDM patients underwent a 3-h glucose tolerance test, a 2-h hyperglycemic glucose clamp study, and a 3-h euglycemic glucose clamp study with tritiated glucose methodology to measure glucose production and disposal rates. RESULTS: Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was greater in both lean and obese NIDDM patients than in control subjects. Insulin responses during the oral glucose tolerance test were similar in obese subjects (control subjects: 417 +/- 64 pmol/l; NIDDM patients: 392 +/- 47 pmol/l) but were reduced in lean NIDDM patients (control subjects: 374 +/- 34 pmol/l; NIDDM patients: 217 +/- 20 pmol/l, P < 0.01). Lean and obese NIDDM patients had absent first-phase insulin responses during the hyperglycemic clamp. Second-phase insulin responses were reduced in lean (P < 0.01 vs. control subjects by analysis of variance) but not obese NIDDM patients. Hepatic glucose output was not increased in lean or obese NIDDM patients. Steady-state (150-180 min) glucose disposal rates were 16% less in lean NIDDM patients (control subjects: 8.93 +/- 0.37 mg.kg LBM (lean body mass)-1.min-1; NIDDM patients: 7.50 +/- 0.28 mg.kg LBM-1.min-1, P < 0.05) and 37% less in obese NIDDM patients (control subjects: 8.17 +/- 0.38 mg.kg LBM-1.min-1; NIDDM patients: 5.03 +/- 0.36 mg.kg LBM-1.min-1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lean elderly NIDDM patients have a profound impairment in glucose-induced insulin release but mild resistance to insulin-mediated glucose disposal. Obese elderly NIDDM patients have adequate circulating insulin, but marked resistance to insulin-mediated glucose disposal. Hepatic glucose output is not increased in elderly NIDDM patients.