Eudragit NE40–Drug Mixed Coating System for Controlling Drug Release of Core Pellets

This study was aimed at developing a controlled-release coating system around core pellets with aqueous dispersion, along with some water channeling agents. Core pellets of diltiazem were prepared using the extrusion-spheronization technique and subsequently coated with aqueous dispersion of Eudragit NE40 alone, or drug–polymer mixtures using bottom-spray fluidized bed coater. The lag time in drug release profiles increased as the coating levels of Eudragit NE40 were increased, whereas no lag time was observed in core pellets coated with drug–polymer mixtures. Mixed coating at the 7% level exhibited comparatively better release profiles and provided desirable release rates during the 12-hour testing interval. Diltiazem HCl release from mixed coating was fairly independent of pH and drug loading. Curing of coated pellets was found to be an essential step for stable drug release profiles. The selection of core size range had remarkable effect on drug release rate and was considerably reduced by using greater core size.     

Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride Sustained-Release Pellets Prepared by a Combination of Hot-Melt Subcoating and Polymer Coating

Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride is an active very highly water soluble substance. In order to control release of a drug with this property, we developed the application of a combination of hot-melt subcoating and polymer coating was developed. The main objective was to investigate the influence of this combination on the release of highly water soluble drug and how it works. Hot-melt subcoating was achieved by using a coating pan. Subsequently, the outer polymer coating was prepared by fluidized bed, and the drug release was determined by high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) method. Hot-melt subcoating can form a barrier between the drug-loaded pellets and the polymer coating layer, which prevents migration of the drug during film application. Consequently, the level of polymer coating can be reduced significantly, and the effectiveness of the polymer coating increased. In this study, the release profile of pellets with a 10% hot-melt subcoating and 5% polymer coating weight gain met the dissolution requirement of USP29 for pseudoephedrine hydrochloride extended-release capsules. Compared with pellets only polymer coated (10% level), the polymer coating level of pellets prepared by this technology was reduced by half due to hot-melt subcoating. By means of this hot-melt subcoating and polymer coating, sustained-release pellets containing pseudoephedrine hydrochloride were successfully prepared.     

Tableting of Eudragit RS and Propranolol Hydrochloride Solid Dispersion: Effect of Particle Size,Compaction Force,and Plasticizer Addition on Drug Release

The application of a solid dispersion (SD) system of propranolol HCl and Eudragit RS was evaluated in the preparation of prolonged release tablets. The effects of SD size fraction, compaction force, and inclusion of plasticizers [namely diethylphtalate (DEP) and triethylcitrate (TEC)] on crushing strengths of matrices and release profile of drug were also investigated. The results showed that when compressed as a tablet, the SD system was more efficient in prolonging drug release than physical mixture. This effect was due to formation of much harder tablets of the SD system (crushing strength 8.5 kg) compared with those of physical mixtures (crushing strength 2.7 kg). All matrices of the SD system showed release rate patterns that were best described by the Higuchi equation. It was also shown that the rate of drug release decreased from 19.8% to 9.13% min^??1/2 as the SD size fraction decreased from 300–350 to 125–250 µm. However, further reduction of size fraction did not significantly affect tablet crushing strength and drug release rate. Increase in compaction force from 5 to 30 kN increased the crushing strength of matrices from 2.9 to 13.6 kg. However, the rate of drug release remained nearly unchanged beyond compaction pressure of 10 kN, indicating that crushing strength of matrices in the range of 8.5–13.6 kg did not affect drug release rate. The addition of 5% or 10% of either plasticizer (DEP or TEC) led to an increase in crushing strength of matrices and more retardation of drug release. This effect was more pronounced for higher concentrations of plasticizers. This effect was probably due to more plastic deformation of matrices under the compaction force, which helped matrices to retain their shape throughout the dissolution test.