Determination of 3‐MCPD esters in edible oil – methods of analysis and comparability of results

The discovery of fatty acid esters of 3‐chloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD) in edible oil products initiated food monitoring campaigns in many EU Member States. As the determination of 3‐MCPD esters was new to most laboratories, questions on the reliability of the produced analysis data were raised. In response to this, the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) organised a proficiency test on the determination of 3‐chloropropane‐1,2‐diol esters (3‐MCPD esters) in edible oils. The aim of this proficiency test was to scrutinise the capabilities of official food control laboratories, private food control laboratories as well as laboratories from food industry to determine the 3‐MCPD esters content of edible oils. The study was carried out in accordance with “The International Harmonised Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of Analytical Chemistry Laboratories” and ISO Guide 43. The test materials dispatched to the participants were: refined palm oil, extra virgin olive oil spiked with 3‐chloropropane‐1,2‐dioleate and 3‐MCPD standard solution in sodium chloride. Altogether 41 laboratories from 11 EU Member States, Switzerland and Macedonia subscribed for participation in the study. The analysis task was to determine the 3‐MCPD esters content as total 3‐MCPD content of the test samples. Participants were free to choose their analysis methods. In total, 34 laboratories reported results to the organisers of the study. The performance of laboratories in the determination of 3‐MCPD esters in edible oils was expressed by z‐scores. About 56% of the participants performed satisfactorily in the determination of 3‐MCPD esters in palm oil and 85% for the spiked extra virgin olive oil test sample. The study revealed that the direct transesterification of the sample without the prior removal of glycidol esters might lead to strong positive bias.     

Generation of 3‐monochloro‐1,2‐propanediol and related materials from tri‐, di‐, and monoolein at deodorization temperature

Heating tests of pure tri‐, di‐, and monoolein (TO, DO, and MO, respectively) with and without the addition of tetrabutylammonium chloride as a chloride source at 240°C revealed the characteristic reactions that generate 3‐monochloro‐1,2‐propanediol‐related materials (3‐MCPD‐RM) in each acylglycerol. 3‐MCPD‐RM were formed mainly from DO and MO, with only a small amount from TO. Glycidyl ester was the predominant class of 3‐MCPD‐RM generated from both DO and MO, and was increased continuously throughout the heating period with comparable rates in both DO and MO, which also generated 3‐MCPD esters with chloride in a short completion time with an achieved level that was fourfold higher for MO than for DO. The production of free glycidol and 3‐MCPD was confirmed only in heated MO, but not from TO and DO, in a closed heating system, although these compounds were never detected in oils heated under simulated distillation conditions using a gas stream. In a closed system, both free glycidol and 3‐MCPD were increased throughout the heating period, which differed from the esters. Since an interesterification reaction, which produced free glycerol, was observed only in heated MO, free glycerol might be one of the precursors for those free forms. For clarification, further investigation is required.     

Determination of total 3‐chloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD) in edible oils by cleavage of MCPD esters with sodium methoxide

A method for the determination of total 3‐chloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD) in edible fats and oils was presented. 3‐MCPD was released from 3‐MCPD fatty acid esters by transesterification with NaOCH₃/methanol. After derivatization with phenylboronic acid, 3‐MCPD was determined by GC‐MS. Deuterium‐labeled 3‐MCPD was used as internal standard. In a model experiment, it was shown that acidic hydrolysis with methanol/sulfuric acid, which is normally used for the release of 3‐MCPD from its esters, can cause problems because under acidic conditions additional 3‐MCPD can be formed. No additional 3‐MCPD was formed using NaOCH₃/methanol for transesterification. Eleven samples of cold‐pressed and refined safflower oils were analyzed with this method. Levels of total 3‐MCPD were in the range from <100 up to 3200 µg/kg.     

Fatty acid esters of glycidol in refined fats and oils

Discrepancies in the analysis of 3‐chloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD) esters can be explained by the hypothesis that in some refined oils significant amounts of fatty acid esters of glycidol (glycidyl esters) are present in addition to 3‐MCPD esters. Glycidyl esters were separated from triacylglycerols by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and detected by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS). Six samples of palm oil and palm oil‐based fats were analyzed by GPC and GC‐MS. In chromatograms of all samples, significant peaks, retention time and mass spectra in conformity with self‐synthesized glycidyl palmitate and glycidyl oleate were detectable. Quantification of individual glycidyl esters was not possible because of a lack of pure standards. Concentration of ester‐bound glycidol in different samples of fats and oils was estimated using an indirect difference method. Glycidyl esters could be detected only in refined, but not in crude or native, fats and oils. The highest concentrations were detected in palm oil and palm oil‐based fats. In a palm oil sample, glycidyl ester concentration varied according to different deodorization parameters, temperature, and time, while 3‐MCPD ester concentration was relatively constant, indicating that mitigation of glycidyl esters possibly may be achieved by optimizing refining parameters.     

Enzymatic removal of 3‐monochloro‐1,2‐propanediol (3‐MCPD) and its esters from oils

3‐Monochloro‐1,2‐propanediol (3‐MCPD) is a contaminant in processed food well known for about 30 years. More recently, this compound has observed attendance due to its occurrence as fatty acid esters in edible oils and products derived from them. In this study, the first enzymatic approach to remove 3‐MCPD and its esters from aqueous and biphasic systems by converting it into glycerol is described. First, 3‐MCPD was converted in an aqueous system by an enzyme cascade consisting of a halohydrin dehalogenase from Arthrobacter sp. AD2 and an epoxide hydrolase from Agrobacterium radiobacter AD1 with complete conversion to glycerol. Next, it could also be shown, that the corresponding oleic acid monoester of 3‐monochloropropanediol‐1‐monooleic‐ester (3‐MCPD‐ester) was converted in a biphasic system in the presence of an edible oil by Candida antarctica lipase A to yield free 3‐MCPD and the corresponding fatty acid. Hence, also 3‐MCPD‐esters can be converted by an enzyme cascade into the harmless product glycerol. Practical applications: Since several reports have been recently published on the contamination of foods with 3‐MCPD and its fatty acid esters, there is a great demand to remove these compounds and an urgency to find useful methods for this. In this contribution, we present an easy enzymatic way to remove 3‐MCPD and its esters from the reaction media (i.e., plant oil) by converting it to the nontoxic glycerol. The method requires neither high temperature nor organic solvents.     

Mitigation of 3‐MCPD and glycidyl esters within the production chain of vegetable oils especially palm oil

In 2007 the oil producing industry and the downstream food processing industry were worried by the announcement that fatty acid esters of 3‐MCPD and later in 2008 that glycidyl esters have been found in different types of vegetable oils after processing. The reason for the concern was that the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment assumed in a first statement the complete degradation of the esters to free 3‐MCPD and glycidol both classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as possible and probably, respectively, carcinogenic to humans. In the meantime a lot of research has been done on these heat‐induced compounds to mitigate their formation during oil processing and today the content in vegetable oils could be remarkably lower if all approaches were implemented. This paper summarizes the different mitigation strategies and shows their effect on lowering the amount of 3‐MCPD and glycidyl esters in refined vegetable oils.     

Application of Indirect Enzymatic Method for Determinations of 2-/3-MCPD-Es and Gly-Es in Foods Containing fats and Oils

Because of the potential health risks, fatty acid esters of 3‐chloro‐1,2‐propanediol (3‐MCPD‐Es), 2‐chloro‐1,3‐propanediol (2‐MCPD‐Es) and glycidol (Gly‐Es) in foods are drawing the attention of public health authorities. To assess applicability of the rapid indirect method developed earlier by using a Candida rugosa lipase for the analyses of refined fats and oils was applied to the analyses of various foods. Mayonnaise, vegetable oil margarine and fat spread could be analyzed with the hydrolysis condition of 30 min at room temperature. Analyses of 3‐MCPD‐Es in margarines and fat spreads containing milk fat could be analyzed by increasing the hydrolysis temperature to 40 °C. The results in a mayonnaise, four fat spreads and five margarines analyzed by the enzymatic method were 0.10–0.98 mg/kg for 3‐MCPD, 0.05–0.41 mg/kg for 2‐MCPD and 0.15–0.59 mg/kg for Gly, and correlated well with the results obtained by AOCS Cd 29a with Cd 30–15 with slopes of 0.99–1.13, and R²s of 0.87–0.99. Further, by adding a simple fat extraction step using a solvent mix at 60 °C, foods high in protein and carbohydrate, such as infant formulas, could also be successfully analyzed with >90 % recovery in 1 day. Because the enzymatic method requires only 30 min for hydrolysis, the method is considered suitable for routine analyses of 2‐/3‐MCPD‐Es and Gly‐Es in foods.     

Influence of milling conditions on the α‐tocopherol content of Picual olive oil

The aim of this study was to estimate the α‐tocopherol content in Picual extra‐virgin olive oils obtained from the 2004/2005 harvesting season and to evaluate the influence that different extraction processes and sample handling had on the final vitamin E content in the oils. A new experimental oil extraction carried out at 9 °C enabled us to obtain encouragingly high quantities of α‐tocopherol with an average quantity reaching 341.34 ± 50.17 mg/L (n = 13), with significant differences among the same oil types produced from the traditional two‐phase system at low (9 °C, p <0.01) and moderate (21.5 °C, p <0.001; 33 °C, p <0.0001) temperatures. The temperature at which extraction was carried out should be considered as a major factor to be taken into account. Additionally, we also developed a precise method for the extraction of α‐tocopherol from olive oil samples, which enables high recovery (96 ± 2%) for use in subsequent HPLC/DAD/fluorescence quantification.     

A Novel Method for Simultaneous Monitoring of 2-MCPD, 3-MCPD and Glycidyl Esters in Oils and Fats

The availability of a reliable methodology for the quantification of fatty acid esters of monochloropropropanediol (MCPD) and glycidol is essential for understanding the mechanism of formation of these process contaminants and for developing effective mitigation strategies. While several analytical methods for the determination of MCPD esters have already been developed and evaluated, only very few procedures are currently available for the analysis of glycidyl esters. This work presents a new indirect method for the simultaneous quantification of fatty acid esters of 2-MCPD, 3-MCPD and glycidol. The method is based on the acid-catalyzed conversion of glycidyl esters into 3-monobromopropanediol (3-MBPD) monoesters which, owing to the structural similarity to MCPD esters, are quantified by using the procedure we previously optimized for the analysis of MCPD esters. The critical step of the method, which is the conversion of glycidyl esters, was optimized by testing different reagent concentrations and varying other condition settings. The novel method showed good repeatability (RSD <2.5 %) and between-day reproducibility (RSD ≤5 %). The limit of detection was 0.04 mg/kg for bound 2-MCPD and 3-MCPD and 0.06 mg/kg for bound glycidol. The trueness of the method was evaluated by the analysis of spiked samples and by interlaboratory comparison.     

Factors Impacting the Formation of 3-MCPD Esters and Glycidyl Esters During Deep Fat Frying of Chicken Breast Meat

The effect of the frying temperature, frying duration and the addition of NaCl on the formation of 3‐monochloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD) esters and glycidyl esters (GE) in palm olein after deep frying was examined in this study. The eight frying systems were deep‐fat frying (at 160 and 180 °C) of chicken breast meat (CBM) (with 0, 1, 3 and 5% sodium chloride, NaCl) for 100 min/day for five consecutive days. All oil samples collected after each day were analyzed for 3‐MCPD ester, GE, and free fatty acid (FFA) contents, specific extinctions at 232 and 268 nm (K₂₃₂ and K₂₆₈), p‐anisidine value (pA), and fatty acid composition. There was a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the 3‐MCPD esters and a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the GE with the increasing of the frying duration. There were significant (p < 0.05) increases in the 3‐MCPD esters formed when the concentration of NaCl increased from 0 to 5%. The addition of NaCl to the CBM during deep frying had no significant effect on the GE generation. The FFA contents, K₂₃₂ and K₂₆₈ and pA showed that all the frying oils were within the safety limit.     

Improvement of accuracy in quantification of 3‐monochloropropane‐1,2‐diol esters by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fettwissenschaft standard methods C‐III 18

By Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fettwissenschaft (DGF) standard methods C‐III 18 for the determination of 3‐monochloropropane‐1,2‐diol (3‐MCPD), the minimum limit of detection was lower in the case of actual oil samples compared to the calibration samples. The problem was found to be lied in the low recovery of 3‐MCPD derivatives from the aqueous phase to the organic phase at the extraction step of the standard procedure. The substitution of the conventional solvent, n‐hexane, with n‐butanol, chloroform, and ethyl acetate increased the recovery to the relative extent of 5.6, 4.7, and 3.9, respectively. The modification contributed to improve the accuracy of the method, especially at lower concentration (<1 ppm) of 3‐MCPD. Practical applications: This paper provides the modification of DGF standard methods C‐III 18 in order to improve the accuracy to quantify 3‐MCPD at lower concentration. It might be important for estimation and control of our daily intake of 3‐MCPD, and for the product control in the fat and oil processing.     

Intestinal digestion of fish oils and ω‐3 concentrates under in vitro conditions

A comparative study of the in vitro bioaccesibility of ω‐3‐oils (salmon oil, SO; tuna oil, TO; enriched‐ω‐3 oil as triacylglycerols (TAGs), ω‐3‐TAG; and enriched‐ω‐3 oil as ethyl esters (EEs), ω‐3‐EE) was performed after treatment with pancreatin (pancreatic lipase as major lipolytic enzyme) at pH 7.5. Aliquots were taken at different times of digestion for analyzing the evolution of lipid products. The micellar phase (MP) formed at 120 min of digestion was isolated, its total lipid content was extracted and its composition in lipid products was analyzed. The rate of hydrolysis of ω‐3‐TAG concentrates was continuous throughout the time of reaction (51% hydrolysis of TAGs at 120 min), whereas the digestion of SO and TO was initially faster but stopped after 10 min of reaction (35 and 38% hydrolysis of TAGs at 120 min of SO and TO, respectively). A poor hydrolysis of EEs took place for the ω‐3‐EE oil (around 7% hydrolysis of EEs at 120 min). The MP of ω‐3‐TAG oil, SO, and TO mainly consisted of free fatty acids (FFAs) and MAGs. The MP from digested ω‐3‐EE oil consisted of FFAs and undigested EEs. Therefore, the highest degree of hydrolysis and inclusion of lipid products in the micellar structure was found for the ω‐3‐TAG oil, but compared to fish oils long times of digestion were required. This experience also shows for the first time the MP composition from ω‐3‐concentrates in the form of EEs. Practical applications: Commercial ω‐3 sources can be found as purified fish oil or concentrates in the form of TAGs, FFAs, and EEs. Despite differences exist regarding their intestinal metabolism, there is lack of information about the specific composition in lipolytic products of the absorbable fraction (MP) from ω‐3‐TAG or ω‐3‐EE concentrates. This comparative study showed that (i) the in vitro bioaccesibility of ω‐3‐polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) seems to be better as ω‐3‐TAG concentrates than purified fish oils, but after long times of digestion; and (ii) the in vitro hydrolysis of ω‐3‐PUFA as EEs seems to be poor, at least after the activity of the major lipolytic enzyme of pancreatin, namely pancreatic lipase. Furthermore, the inclusion of EEs within micellar structures seems to be limited. These results contribute to the knowledge of the intestinal lipolysis of ω‐3 sources by showing the composition of the MP on lipid products for the first time.     

What we know and what we should know about virgin oils – a general introduction

On international scale the Codex Alimentarius Standard for Named Vegetable Oils differentiates between virgin oils and cold‐pressed oils, while in Germany virgin, non‐refined and refined oils are available. Here cold‐pressed is an additional quality feature. The paper explains and comments the various definitions for vegetable oils other than olive oil obtained by mechanical extraction only, because they are partly contradictory. Resulting from gentle processing virgin oils are often appreciated by the consumers as the better oils. The answer of the present paper to the question which type of oil is better is that there is no better or worse oil, but only a better or worse suitability of an oil for application in food processing or the kitchen. Finally, the paper picks up the upcoming debate on the potential ’?new' contaminant, 3‐MCPD‐fatty acid esters, which were found in refined oils.