Declarative paradigm of test coverage

Two facts about declarative programming prevent the application of conventional testing methods. First, the classical test coverage measures such as statement, branch or path coverage, cannot be used, since in declarative programs no control flow notion exists. Second, there is no widely accepted language available for formal specification, since predicate logic, which is the most common formalism for declarative programming, is already a very high-level abstract language. This paper presents a new approach exending previous work by the authors on test input generation for declarative programs. For this purpose, the existing program instrumentation notion is extended and a new logic coverage measure is introduced. The approach is mathematically formalized and the goal of achieving 100% program logic coverage controls the automatic test input generation. The method is depicted by means of logic programming; the results are, however, generally applicable. Finally, the concepts introduced have been used practically within a test environment. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The narrowing-driven approach to functional logic program specialization

Partial evaluation is a semantics-based program optimization technique which has been investigated within different programming paradigms and applied to a wide variety of languages. Recently, a partial evaluation framework for functional logic programs has been proposed. In this framework, narrowing—the standard operational semantics of integrated languages—is used to drive the partial evaluation process. This paper surveys the essentials of narrowing-driven partial evaluation. Elvira Albert, Ph.D.: She is an associate professor in Computer Science at the Technical University of Valencia, Spain. She received her bachelors degree in computer science in 1998 and her Ph.D. in computer science in 2001, both from the Technical University of Valencia. She has investigated on program optimization and on partial evaluation for declarative multi-paradigm programming languages. Her current research interests include term rewriting, multi-paradigm declarative programming, and formal methods, in particular semantics-based program analysis, transformation, specification, verification, and debugging. Germán Vidal, Ph.D.: He is an associate professor in Computer Science at the Technical University of Valencia, Spain. He obtained his bachelors degree in computer science in 1992 and his Ph.D. in computer science in 1996, both from the Technical University of Valencia. He is active on several research topics in Functional Logic Programming. He has worked on compositionality, on abstract interpretation, and on program transformation techniques for functional logic programs. Currently, his research interests include declarative multi-paradigm programming languages, term rewriting, and semantics-based program manipulation, in particular partial evaluation.     

Logic programming with solution preferences

Preference logic programming (PLP) is an extension of logic programming for declaratively specifying problems requiring optimization or comparison and selection among alternative solutions to a query. PLP essentially separates the programming of a problem itself from the criteria specification of its solution selection. In this paper we present a declarative method for specifying preference logic programs. The method introduces a precise formalization for the syntax and semantics of PLP. The syntax of a preference logic program contains two disjoint sets of definite clauses, separating a core program specifying a general computational problem from its preference rules for optimization; the semantics of PLP is given based on the Herbrand model and fixed point theory, where how preferences affects the least Herbrand model of a logic program is interpreted as a sequence of meta-level mapping operations. In addition, we present an operational semantics based on a new resolution strategy and a memoized recursive algorithm for computing strictly stratified logic programs with well-formed preferences, and further show that the operational semantics of such a preference logic program is consistent to its declarative semantics.     

Beyond multi-adjoint logic programming

In ‘multi-adjoint logic programming’, MALP in brief, each fuzzy logic program is associated with its own ‘multi-adjoint lattice’ for modelling truth degrees beyond the simpler case of true and false, where a large set of fuzzy connectives can be defined. On this wide repertoire, it is crucial to connect each implication symbol with a proper conjunction thus conforming constructs of the form (←_i, &_i) called ‘adjoint pairs’, whose use directly affects both declarative and operational semantics of the MALP framework. In this work, we firstly show how the strong dependence of adjoint pairs can be largely weakened for an interesting ‘sub-class’ of MALP programs. Then, we reason in a similar way till conceiving a ‘super-class’ of fuzzy logic programs beyond MALP, which definitively drops out the need for using adjoint pairs, since the new semantics behaviour relies on much more relaxed lattices than multi-adjoint ones.     

Toward a programming theory for rational agents

An important problem in agent verification is a lack of proper understanding of the relation between agent programs on the one hand and agent logics on the other. Understanding this relation would help to establish that an agent programming language is both conceptually well-founded and well-behaved, as well as yield a way to reason about agent programs by means of agent logics. As a step toward bridging this gap, we study several issues that need to be resolved in order to establish a precise mathematical relation between a modal agent logic and an agent programming language specified by means of an operational semantics. In this paper, we present an agent programming theory that provides both an agent programming language as well as a corresponding agent verification logic to verify agent programs. The theory is developed in stages to show, first, how a modal semantics can be grounded in a state-based semantics, and, second, how denotational semantics can be used to define the mathematical relation connecting the logic and agent programming language. Additionally, it is shown how to integrate declarative goals and add precompiled plans to the programming theory. In particular, we discuss the use of the concept of higher-order goals in our theory. Other issues such as a complete axiomatization and the complexity of decision procedures for the verification logic are not the focus of this paper and remain for future investigation. Part of this research was carried out while the first author was affiliated with the Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Radboud University Nijmegen.     

A residualizing semantics for the partial evaluation of functional logic programs

Recent proposals for multi-paradigm declarative programming combine the most important features of functional, logic and concurrent programming into a single framework. The operational semantics of these languages is usually based on a combination of narrowing and residuation. In this paper, we introduce a non-standard, residualizing semantics for multi-paradigm declarative programs and prove its equivalence with a standard operational semantics. Our residualizing semantics is particularly relevant within the area of program transformation where it is useful, e.g., to perform computations during partial evaluation. Thus, the proof of equivalence is a crucial result to demonstrate the correctness of (existing) partial evaluation schemes.     

A program specialiser for meta-level compositions of logic programs

Metal-level compositions of object logic programs are naturally implemented by means of meta-programming techniques. Metainterpreters defining program compositions however suffer from a computational overhead that is due partly to the interpretation layer present in all meta-programs, and partly to the specific interpretation layer needed to deal with program compositions. We show that meta-interpreters implementing compositions of object programs can be fruitfully specialised w.r.t. meta-level queries of the form Demo (E, G), where E denotes a program expression and G denotes a (partially instantiated) object level query. More precisely, we describe the design and implementation of declarative program specialiser that suitably transforms such meta-interpreters so as to sensibly reduce — if not to completely remove — the overhead due to the handling of program compositions. In many cases the specialiser succeeds in eliminating also the overhead due to meta-interpretation. Antonio Brogi, Ph.D.: He is currently assistant professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Pisa, Italy. He received his Laurea Degree in Computer Science (1987) and his Ph. D. in Computer Science (1993) from the University of Pisa. His research interests include programming language design and semantics, logic programming, deductive databases, and software coordination. Simone Contiero: He is currently a Ph. D. student at the Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa (Italy). He received his Laurea Degree in Computer Science from the University of Pisa in 1994. His research interests are in high-level programming languages, metaprogramming and logic-based coordination of software.     

Discovering rules to design newspapers: An inductive constraint logic programming approach

Inductive logic programming combines both machine learning and logic programming techniques. ILP uses first-order predicate logic restricted to Horn clauses as an underlying language. Thus, programs induced by an ILP system inherit the classical limitations of PROLOG programs. Constraint logic programming avoids some of the limitations of logic programming, and so ILP aims to induce programs that employ this paradigm. Current ILP systems that induce constrained logic programs extend systems based on the normal semantics ofILP. In this article we introduce IC-Log, a new system that induces constrained logic programs and relies on an extension ofa nonmonotonic semantics-based system. We then present an application of IC-Log in the field ofcomputer-aided publishing.     

Protected completions of first-order general logic programs

Minker and Perlis [15] have made the important observation that in certain circumstances, it might be desirable to prevent the inference of A when A is in the finite failure set of a logic program P. In this paper, we investigate the model-theoretic aspects of their proposal and develop a Fitting-style [5] declarative semantics for protected completions of general logic programs (containing function symbols). This extends the Minker-Perlis proposal which applies to function-free pure logic programs. In addition, an operational semantics is proposed and it is proven to be sound for existentially quantified positive queries and negative ground queries to general, canonical protected logic programs. Completeness issues are investigated and completeness is proved for positive existential queries and negative ground queries for the following classes of programs: (1) function-free general protected logic programs (the Minker-Perlis operational semantics apply to function-free pure protected logic programs), (2) pure protected logic programs (with function symbols) and (3) protected general logic programs that do not contain any internal variables (though they may contain function symbols).     

Hyperequivalence of logic programs with respect to supported models

Recent research in nonmonotonic logic programming has focused on certain types of program equivalence, which we refer to here as hyperequivalence, that are relevant for program optimization and modular programming. So far, most results concern hyperequivalence relative to the stable-model semantics. However, other semantics for logic programs are also of interest, especially the semantics of supported models which, when properly generalized, is closely related to the autoepistemic logic of Moore. In this paper, we consider a family of hyperequivalence relations for programs based on the semantics of supported and supported minimal models. We characterize these relations in model-theoretic terms. We use the characterizations to derive complexity results concerning testing whether two programs are hyperequivalent relative to supported and supported minimal models.     

Dynamic reordering of alternatives for definite logic programs

Due to their highly declarative nature and efficiency, tabled logic programming systems have been applied to solving many complex problems. Tabled logic programming is essential for extending traditional logic programming with tabled resolution. In this paper, we propose a new tabled resolution scheme, called dynamic reordering of alternatives (DRA) resolution, for definite logic programs. The scheme keeps track of the type of the subgoals during resolution; if the subgoal in the current resolvent is a variant of a former tabled subgoal, tabled answers are used to resolve the subgoal; otherwise, program clauses are used similar to SLD resolution. Program clauses leading to variant subgoals at runtime are dynamically reordered for further computation until the subgoals are completely evaluated. DRA resolution allows query evaluation to be performed in a depth-first, left-to-right traversal order similar to Prolog-typed SLD resolution, thus yielding a simple technique for incorporating tabled resolution in traditional logic programming systems. We show the correctness of DRA resolution.     

An alternative approach to the semantics of disjunctive logic programs and deductive databases

In this paper, we study a new semantics of logic programming and deductive databases. Thepossible model semantics is introduced as a declarative semantics of disjunctive logic programs. The possible model semantics is an alternative theoretical framework to the classical minimal model semantics and provides a flexible inference mechanism for inferring negation in disjunctive logic programs. We also present a proof procedure for the possible model semantics and show that the possible model semantics has an advantage from the computational complexity point of view.This is a revised and extended version of the paper [36] which was presented at the Tenth International Conference on Logic Programming, Budapest, 21–25 June 1993.     

Aggregation and negation-as-failure

Set-grouping and aggregation are powerful operations of practical interest in database query languages. An aggregate operation is a function that maps a set to some value, e.g., the maximum or minimum in the set, the cardinality of this set, the summation of all its members, etc. Since aggregate operations are typically non-monotonic in nature, recursive programs making use of aggregate operations must be suitably restricted in order that they have a well-defined meaning. In a recent paper we showed that partial-order clauses provide a well-structured means of formulating aggregate operations with recursion. In this paper, we consider the problem of expressing partial-order programs via negation-as-failure (NF), a well-known non-monotonic operation in logic programming. We show a natural translation of partial-order programs to normal logic programs: Anycost-monotonic partial-order programsP is translated to astratified normal program such that the declarative semantics ofP is defined as the stratified semantics of the translated program. The ability to effect such a translation is significant because the resulting normal programs do not make any explicit use of theaggregation capability, yet they are concise and intuitive. The success of this translation is due to the fact that the translated program is a stratified normal program. That would not be the case for other more general classes of programs thancost-monotonic partial-order programs. We therefore develop in stages a refined translation scheme that does not require the translated programs to be stratified, but requires the use of a suitable semantics. The class of normal programs originating from this refined translation scheme is itself interesting: Every program in this class has a clear intended total model, although these programs are in general neither stratified nor call-consistent, and do not have a stable model. The partial model given by the well-founded semantics is consistent with the intended total model and the extended well founded semantics,WFS ⁺, defines the intended model. Since there is a well-defined and efficient operational semantics for partial-order programs^{14, 15, 21)} we conclude that the gap between expression of a problem and computing its solution can be reduced with the right level of notation. Mauricio J. Osorio G., Ph.D.: He is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Systems Engineering, University of the Americas, Puebla, Mexico. He is the Head of the Laboratory of Theoretical Computer Science of the Center of Research (CENTIA), Puebla, Mexico. His research is currently funded by CENTIA and CONACYT (Ref. #C065-E9605). He is interested in Applications of Logic to Computer Science, with special emphasis on Logic Programming. He received his B.Sc. in Computer Science from the Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, his M.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from CINVESTAV in Mexico, and his Ph.D. from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 1995. Bharat Jayaraman, Ph.D.: He is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the State University of New York at Buffalo. He obtained his bachelors degree in Electronics from the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras in 1975, and his Ph.D. from the University of Utah in 1981. His research interests are in Programming Languages and Declarative Modeling of Complex Systems. He has published over 50 research papers. He has served on the program committees of several conferences in the area of Programming Languages, and he is presently on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Functional and Logic Programming.     

Logic Programs,Compatibility and Forward Chaining Construction

Logic programming under the stable model semantics is proposed as a non-monotonic language for knowledge representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence. In this paper, we explore and extend the notion of compatibility and the Λ operator, which were first proposed by Zhang to characterize default theories. First, we present a new characterization of stable models of a logic program and show that an extended notion of compatibility can characterize stable submodels. We further propose the notion of weak auto-compatibility which characterizes the Normal Forward Chaining Construction proposed by Marek, Nerode and Remmel. Previously, this construction was only known to construct the stable models of FC-normal logic programs, which turn out to be a proper subclass of weakly auto-compatible logic programs. We investigate the properties and complexity issues for weakly auto-compatible logic programs and compare them with some subclasses of logic programs.     

Declarative error diagnosis

This paper presents an error diagnoser which finds errors in logic programs which use the extended syntax and advanced control facilities. The diagnoser isdeclarative, in the sense that the programmer need only know the intended interpretation of an incorrect program to use the diagnoser. In particular, the programmer needs no understanding whatever of the underlying computational behaviour of the PROLOG system which runs the program. It is argued that declarative error diagnosers will be indispensable components of advanced logic programming systems, which are currently under development.     

Semantic forgetting in answer set programming

The notion of forgetting, also known as variable elimination, has been investigated extensively in the context of classical logic, but less so in (nonmonotonic) logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning. The few approaches that exist are based on syntactic modifications of a program at hand. In this paper, we establish a declarative theory of forgetting for disjunctive logic programs under answer set semantics that is fully based on semantic grounds. The suitability of this theory is justified by a number of desirable properties. In particular, one of our results shows that our notion of forgetting can be entirely captured by classical forgetting. We present several algorithms for computing a representation of the result of forgetting, and provide a characterization of the computational complexity of reasoning from a logic program under forgetting. As applications of our approach, we present a fairly general framework for resolving conflicts in inconsistent knowledge bases that are represented by disjunctive logic programs, and we show how the semantics of inheritance logic programs and update logic programs from the literature can be characterized through forgetting. The basic idea of the conflict resolution framework is to weaken the preferences of each agent by forgetting certain knowledge that causes inconsistency. In particular, we show how to use the notion of forgetting to provide an elegant solution for preference elicitation in disjunctive logic programming.     

Relating the implementation techniques of functional and functional logic languages

Functional logic languages are declarative programming languages that integrate the programming paradigms of functional and logic languages within a single framework. They are extensions of functional languages with principles derived from logic programmingNarrowing, the evaluation mechanism of functional logic languages, can be defined as a generalization ofreduction, the evaluation mechanism of purely functional languages. The unidirectional pattern matching, which is used for parameter passing in functional languages, is simply replaced by the bidirectionalunification known from logic programming languages. We show in this paper, how to extend a reduction machine, that has been designed for the evaluation of purely functional programs to a machine that performs narrowing. The necessary extensions concern the realization of unification and backtracking, for which we fall back upon the methods of Warren’s Prolog engine.²¹⁾ The narrowing machine embodies an optimized treatment of deterministic computations. A complete specification of the reduction and the narrowing machine and of the translation of a sample language into abstract machine code is given. Comparative results of a C-implementation of the reduction and the narrowing machine show that the time overhead of the more complex narrowing evaluation is, in general, less than 10% of the reduction evaluation.     

Symmetric structure in logic programming

It is argued that some symmetric structure in logic programs could be taken into account when implementing semantics in logic programming. This may enhance the declarative ability or expressive power of the semantics. The work presented here may be seen as representative examples along this line. The focus is on the derivation of negative information and some other classic semantic issues. We first define a permutation group associated with a given logic program. Since usually the canonical models used to reflect the common sense or intended meaning are minimal or completed models of the program, we expose the relationships between minimal models and completed models of the original program and its so-called G-reduced form newly-derived via the permutation group defined. By means of this G-reduced form, we introduce a rule to assume negative information termed G-CWA, which is actually a generalization of the GCWA. We also develop the notions of G-definite, G-hierarchical and G-stratified logic programs,