Down regulation of yeast G protein-coupled receptors

In this research, totally 200 raw milk samples in different areas of Ankara were collected from various dairy plant. The isolated psychotrophic bacteria from the raw milk samples are the species of Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Alcaligenes and Aeromonas. Isolation of Pseudomonas and other gram(-) psychrotrophic bacteria types are determined as P. aeruginosa 11 (5.5%), P. putida 11 (5.5%), P. fluorescens biotype I 10 (5.0%), P. fluorescens biotype II 4 (2.0%), P. fluorescens biotype III 6 (3.0%), P. aurefaciens 2 (1.0%), P. pseudomallei 3 (1.5%), P. cepacia 1 (0.5%), A. calcoaceticus lowffii 5 (2.5%), A. calcoaceticus anitratum 4 (2.0%), A. faecalis 3 (1.5%) and A. hydrophilia 1 (0.5%).     

Possible involvement of a ubiquitous and several distinct elements in the transcription regulation of the chicken H3 histone gene family

HIV replication in vitro is regulated by many factors, including various exogeneous stimuli and proteins encoded by either virus or cellular genomes. During the asymptomatic period, cells latently or chronically infected with HIV gradually express virus, leading to immunosuppression and opportunistic infection. These conditions would result in the increased secretion of cytokines, especially TNF, from infected and uninfected cells, which can induce HIV and killing of infected cells. A vicious circle is then set in motion in which heterologous microbial infections directly or indirectly activate HIV and the production of cytokines, thereby accelerating lymphocyte depletion and immunodeficiency. AIDS is a disorder of the immune network caused by a unique retrovirus HIV. However, if the whole story described above is true, this disease can also be termed a "cytokine disease". Immunity resembles a "double-edged sword", with aspects not only protective, but also deleterious to the host. Therefore, it is essential to more extensively investigate the mechanism of cytokine regulation of HIV expression in vivo, not only to understand the complex pathophysiology of AIDS, but also to design a therapeutic strategy to halt this deadly disease.     

Vesicle budding on Golgi membranes: regulation by G proteins and myosin motors

One of the main functions of the Golgi complex is to generate transport vesicles for the post-Golgi trafficking of proteins in secretory pathways. Many different populations of vesicles are distinguished by unique sets of structural and regulatory proteins which participate in vesicle budding and fusion. Monomeric and heterotrimeric G proteins regulate vesicle budding and secretory traffic into and out of the Golgi complex. An inventory of G protein alpha subunits associated with Golgi membranes highlights their diverse involvement and potential for coupling Golgi trafficking, through various signal transduction pathways, to cell growth or other more specialized cell functions. Cytoskeletal proteins are now also known to associate specifically with the Golgi complex and Golgi-derived vesicles. Amongst these, conventional and unconventional myosins are recruited to vesicle membranes. Several roles in vesicle budding and vesicle trafficking can be proposed for these actin-based motors.     

Selective interactions of mu-opioid receptors with pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins: involvement of the third intracellular loop and the c-terminal tail in coupling

A cDNA encoding the rat mu-opioid receptor was expressed stably in a Rat-1 fibroblast cell line. Expression of this receptor was demonstrated with specific binding of the mu-opioid selective ligand [3H][D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin ([3H]DAMGO). In membranes of clone mu11 cells DAMGO produced a robust, concentration-dependent stimulation of basal high affinity GTPase activity. Cholera toxin-catalyzed [32P]ADP-ribosylation in membranes of this clone labelled a 40 kDa Gi family polypeptide(s) that was markedly enhanced by the addition of DAMGO. Antisera against Gi2alpha and Gi3alpha were both able to immunoprecipitate a [32P]-radiolabelled 40 kDa polypeptide(s) from DAMGO and cholera-toxin treated membranes of clone mu11, indicating that the mu-opioid receptor was able to interact effectively with both Gi2 and Gi3 in Rat-1 fibroblasts. A series of peptides derived from the delta-opioid receptor sequence were assessed for their ability to modify agonist-stimulated G protein activation and [3H] agonist binding to the receptor. In membranes from the clone mu11, specific binding of [3H]DAMGO was reduced by peptides corresponding to the NH2-terminal region of the third intracellular loop (i3.1) and the carboxyl-terminal tail (i4) of this receptor. Agonist stimulated GTPase activity and DAMGO dependent cholera toxin-catalyzed [32P]ADP-ribosylation were inhibited by peptides derived from the proximal (i3.1) and the distal portion (i3.3) of the third intracellular loop. Peptide i3.1 also inhibited DAMGO-stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP-gammaS) binding in the same membranes. In contrast, peptides derived from the second intracellular loop were without any effect.     

Suppression of ANP gene transcription by liganded vitamin D receptor: involvement of specific receptor domains

We showed previously that liganded vitamin D receptor (VDR) effects a suppression of human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP) gene-promoter activity in cultured neonatal rat atrial myocytes. In the present study, we have attempted to identify the structural domains of the VDR that are involved in mediating this suppression. We examined the effects of a series of VDR mutants on a cotransfected hANP promoter-driven chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter. Neither the native VDR nor any of the mutants tested displayed inhibitory activity in the absence of the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (VD3) ligand. Delta134, a deletant harboring solely the DNA binding region of the VDR, and L254G, a mutant shown to be defective in retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimer formation in other systems, were as effective as the native VDR in reducing promoter activity. HBD, a deletant containing only the hormone-binding domain of the VDR, and K246G, a point mutant that is defective in the activation function of the receptor, did not attenuate reporter activity. A similar activity profile was displayed when a positively regulated promoter containing a direct-repeat vitamin D responsive element (DR3-CAT) was examined in these cells. Liganded VDR, the delta134 mutant, and liganded L254G effected increases in DR3-CAT activity of 2.5-, 2-, and 4-fold, respectively. Two nonhypercalcemic analogues of VD3 (RO 23-7553 and RO 25-6760) displayed the same inhibitory activity as VD3. These studies suggest that the inhibition of hANP promoter activity requires both the DNA binding and activation functions of the receptor but does not appear to require formation of a classic RXR alpha-VDR heterodimer.     

Negative regulation of transcription by anti-sigma factors

The identification, mapping and eventual cloning of genes which determine or influence important epidemiological traits in parasites can have great benefits for the control of parasitic disease. In this review, strategies are outlined for identifying genetic markers for complex, quantitative traits. A genetic marker is a variable DNA sequence which co-occurs with a variable quantitative trait. Candidate markers are chosen because they are thought to directly influence the trait whereas random markers are expected to be linked to another DNA sequence which influences the trait. Association studies compare the value of a quantitative trait between different marker genotype classes in a population, without regard to family structure. Linkage studies compare the value of a quantitative trait between marker genotype classes within families or within a population (usually derived from a cross between inbred lines) which is segregating for both marker and quantitative trait loci. The most commonly used analytical methods for determining the significance of association or linkage between marker and quantitative trait loci, and for estimating parameters such as recombination rate and quantitative gene action, are least-squares and maximum likelihood. Both methods may be used to test either single markers or the interval between flanking markers, and both suffer from the need to minimize type I and type II error rates with multiple tests.