External Support of Problem Analysis in Design Problem Solving

Design is described as creative design problem solving. The first step of the design process is to identify and analyze the design problem. This step has an important influence on the creation of an effective design solution. In two experiments, we tested the benefits that sketching provides during the analysis process in design problem solving. In particular, this paper focuses on the design process, the act of sketching, the sketch itself, and the final product. In prior studies, the process of sketching has been shown to enhance the construction of a mental representation, and thus the sketch has improved the analysis of the problem. The memory supporting effect of sketches is verified in the second experiment discussed in this paper. Finally, this paper also discusses the support possibilities the sketch offers for the early stages of the design process.     

Design Support Using Distributed Web-Based AI Tools

Currently, designers are faced with searching through a ‘sea’ of on-line knowledge to support their decision making activities. This paper describes WebCADET, which is a reimplementation of the stand-alone CADET – a Knowledge-Based System (KBS) for product design evaluation. WebCADET aims to provide effective and efficient support for designers during their searches for design knowledge. WebCADET uses the ‘AI as text’ approach, where KBSs can be seen as a medium to facilitate the communication of design knowledge between designers. The development of WebCADET to include practical support via World Wide Web-based functionality, which illustrates the potential of the ‘AI as text’ approach, is described in the paper.     

Structure and Matrix Models for Tolerance Analysis from Configuration to Detail Design

A substantial amount of all quality problems that arise during assembly can be referred back to the geometrical design, and especially the geometrical concept of the product, i.e. the way in which parts are designed and located with each other. Special emphasis should thus be put on geometry design, especially during the early design phases, to try to find robust concepts and avoid solutions that may cause down-stream production problems.  This paper presents a generic set of evaluation tools for robust geometry design encountering (i) potential tolerance chain detection in configuration design, (ii) assembly robustness evaluation in concept design, and (iii) tolerance sensitivity analysis in detail design. Special attention is given to the development of a new matrix-based evaluation tool for the configuration design part. The tool presented is based on a new way of representing geometry variation constraints in an enhanced function-means tree structure model. Different parts of the function-means tree that are of interest for analysis purposes are then extracted and converted to matrix representation. The reason for doing this is that the structure model is most suitable for modeling, but becomes unsuitable for analysis as the model complexity increases. For this latter purpose, the matrix representation is far better. The use of the different tools is demonstrated in the design of a new vehicle front system for which the geometry a priori is unknown.     

Numerical Modeling of a Post & Dome Snap-Fit Feature

Snap-fits are often designed using guides that rely on classic beam theory, with the basic assumption that the beam undergoes small rotations and displacements. This is a poor assumption, for they typically experience both large rotations and displacements due to loading offset from the neutral axis and axial loading. This paper investigates the performance of the post & dome feature, establishes its nomenclature, and derives the equations needed to intelligently design different variations of it. The post & dome feature was selected for analysis because it is a high performance snap-fit that is self-datuming and can withstand some shear loading in addition to retention. The design equations were generated in three steps. First, an experimental array was created using a design of experiments approach. Finite element methods and multiple regression techniques were used in lieu of beam equations models for each of the trials in the experimental array. Finally, response surface methods were used to develop response curves based on the performance data generated by the finite element models. Sensitivity data was plotted for both the main effects and selected variable interactions. The traditional benchmarks for defining high performance snap-fits are retention strength, insertion force, and insertion strain. This paper uses an expanded definition of these benchmarks that also includes locking ratio (the ratio of retention force to insertion force).     

Functional Interdependence and Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs

In this paper, related product functions are determined for a group of approximately 70 consumer products. Using customer need data, a new matrix approach is introduced to identify these relationships. Techniques are then created for determining product similarity. These techniques are clarified and validated through three case studies, including beverage brewers and material-removal products. The results of these case studies are argued to have significant impact on design-by-analogy procedures, benchmarking methods, mass customization strategies and modular design. The paper concludes with a discussion of applications and related procedures for product development.     

A Taxonomy for Design Requirements from Corporate Customers

We have developed a taxonomy that classifies those needs of a corporation that impact product design. We call these needs corporate requirements. In contrast to the consumer or end-user requirements, corporate requirements come from internal sources such as marketing, finance, manufacturing, and service. This taxonomy allows for an organized method of gathering, managing, and retrieving the requirements. The taxonomy also helps to facilitate a broader, clearer form of Quality Function Deployment. Generic in nature, this taxonomy provides a template with which to create taxonomies for a given product within a given company or industry. We include an industrial case study to demonstrate this concept.     

Internet-Based Design Catalogue for the Shaft and Bearing

The Internet and World Wide Web (WWW) are evolving as an important communication technology. This paper examines the development of an Internet-based online catalogue on the WWW. An interactive website is prepared that helps a remote designer to design shafts and bearings based on various input parameters provided. The web site also provides solid models of the shaft to perform CAD and FEM analysis. This permits the user to make further investigations, and helps to modify the design satisfactory.     

Coordination Approaches and Systems – Part II: An Operational Perspective

This is the second of two papers surveying research in coordination approaches and systems. This paper is concerned with operational coordination, which is aimed at coordinating activities such that the design process can be performed in a near optimal manner with respect to time, and the allocation and utilisation of resources. Aspects of coordination categorised as operational include resource management, scheduling and planning. The first of these two papers presents a review of coordination from a strategic perspective, which is concerned with the decision management aspects of coordination. Greater emphasis is now being placed on the significance of organising the design process as this affects time to market, product quality, cost, and consequently product success. The aim of this paper is to present a fundamental review of operational coordination approaches and systems. The 1990s has seen much progress being made towards a greater understanding and appreciation of coordination in various disciplines through the development of a wide range of approaches and systems. However, there remains a requirement to formally identify the key issues involved in coordination such that a widely accepted representation can be agreed upon. Consequently, research should continue to be supported in the exploration for a unified approach to coordination which will permit a broader and greater understanding of those aspects involved.     

A Study on Engineering History Base

During engineering processes, many kinds and amounts of information are used and produced. Such information is useful in successive cases, and thus its reuse is desired. In this paper, information on attributes of the products is referred to as ‘product information’, and information on the reasons for and/or history of a designer’s thought process is referred to as ‘process information’. According to this classification, process information can be used for obtaining an explanation of product information. The purpose of this work is to build a database, called an ‘engineering history base’, from which engineers can retrieve explanations to enable the reuse of product information. In this paper, explanation from the ‘process’ viewpoint is thought to be important in promoting the reuse of product information. There are two types of explanation for the process: teleological and causal. However, until now, little attention has been paid to the causal explanation for the process. Thus, in this paper, an information model which focuses on both types of explanation is proposed. The model is adopted for the engineering history base and a prototype system is developed. The appropriateness of this model is discussed by analyzing the actual data in the development of a color video printer.     

Developing Strategic Alliances: A Framework for Collaborative Negotiation in Design

This work applies a theory-based framework of collaborative negotiation to some of the disputes that regularly arise during group design. Although the framework was developed to provide general support for group work, this paper focuses on its use as a design tool. The framework, embodied in our system NegotiationLens, has four facets. It: 1. Provides a negotiation method intended to produce gain for all parties. 2. Provides an efficient process for conflict resolution. 3. Develops working alliances. 4. Lets parties decide quickly when they should go their separate ways. The framework produces the above results by: • Helping parties develop well-reasoned and clearly articulated points of view (Adelson and Jordan, 1991; Conklin and Yakemovic, 1991; Conklin and Begeman, 1988; MacLean et al ., 1991). • Creating a context of committment and respect. • Moving negotiating parties away from an adversarial stance and into a collaboration. • Allowing joint construction of solutions that are more beneficial than the unilateral solutions each party initially brought to the table. We present our framework for collaborative negotiation, describe NegotiationLens, and present two cases in which it was used. We present a third case, a large design project with recurrent design conflicts, and argue how NegotiationLens could have been of benefit there.     

Tuning Parameter Tolerance Design: Foundations, Methods, and Measures

In this paper, a novel technique is presented to solve tolerance design problems. To achieve the desired performance tolerance, the technique uses a subtle, but significant, change in the design: the addition of a tuning parameter in place of an increase in component precision. Statistical models are used to develop a framework for the tuning parameter design method. Also developed is a new, dimensionless design metric which ranks candidate tuning parameters. A step-by-step method is developed for the application of tuning parameters using this metric. The step-by-step tuning parameter design method is applied to a heavy-duty manual stapler as a clarifying example.     

Observations on Some German Contributions to Engineering Design In Memory of Professor Wolfgang Beitz

This paper, written in memory of Professor Wolfgang Beitz, discusses some of the influences of the work undertaken in Germany on systematic engineering design. It highlights differences between the language regions, and gives examples of design research and design education linked to Konstruktionslehre– the standard text on systematic engineering design for which Professor Beitz was most widely recognised outside Germany. The paper finishes with a plea for a greater exchange of ideas.     

A-Design: An Agent-Based Approach to Conceptual Design in a Dynamic Environment

This paper provides an introduction to a new design methodology known as A-Design, which combines aspects of multi-objective optimization, multi-agent systems, and automated design synthesis. The A-Design theory is founded on the notion that engineering design occurs in interaction with an ever-changing environment, and therefore computer tools developed to aid in the design process should be adaptive to these changes. In this paper, A-Design is introduced along with some simple test problems to demonstrate the capabilities of different aspects of the theory. The theory of A-Design is then shown as the basis for a design tool that adaptively creates electro-mechanical configuration designs for changing user preferences.     

Coordination Approaches and Systems – Part I: A Strategic Perspective

This is the first part of a two-part paper presenting a fundamental review and summary of research of design coordination and cooperation technologies. The theme of this review is aimed at the research conducted within the decision management aspect of design coordination. The focus is therefore on the strategies involved in making decisions and how these strategies are used to satisfy design requirements. The paper reviews research within collaborative and coordinated design, project and workflow management, and, task and organization models. The research reviewed has attempted to identify fundamental coordination mechanisms from different domains, however it is concluded that domain independent mechanisms need to be augmented with domain specific mechanisms to facilitate coordination. Part II is a review of design coordination from an operational perspective.     

A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms

One of the topics that has received the attention of mathematicians, scientists and engineers is the notion of complexity. The subject is still being debated, as it lacks a common definition of complexity, concrete theories that can predict complex phenomena, and the mathematical tools that can deal with problems involving complexity. In axiomatic design, complexity is defined only when specific functional requirements or the exact nature of the query are defined. Complexity is defined as a measure of uncertainty in achieving a set of specific functions or functional requirements. Complexity is related to information, which is defined in terms of the probability of success of achieving the Functional Requirements (FRs). There are two classes of complexity: time-dependent complexity and time-independent complexity. There are two orthogonal components of time-independent complexity, i.e., real complexity and imaginary complexity. The vector sum is called absolute complexity. Real complexity of coupled design is larger than that of uncoupled or decoupled designs. Imaginary complexity can be reduced when the design matrix is known. As an example of time-independent imaginary complexity, the design of a printing machine based on xerography is discussed. There are two kinds of time-dependent real complexity: time-dependent combinatorial complexity and time-dependent periodic complexity. Using a robot-scheduling problem as an example, it is shown that a coupled design with a combinatorial complexity can be reduced to a decoupled design with periodic complexity. The introduction of periodicity simplifies the design by making it deterministic, which requires much less information. Whenever a combinatorial complexity is converted to a periodic complexity, complexity and uncertainty is reduced and design simplified.     

A Dominance-based Design Metric in Multiattribute Robust Design

This paper outlines the development of an effective and consistent ‘designing-in-quality’ strategy that can be used to deal with concepts of uncertainty, quality and robustness in engineering design. Specifically, this paper presents a decision analysis-based robust design metric that seamlessly integrates objective evaluations on the goodness of a design alternative with the designer’s intent and preferences. This is achieved through the development of a set of performance-reflecting dominance indices for the attributes and their utilization in a preference-influenced multiattribute utility formulation. Such a knowledge feedback-based decision model development will be particularly useful when dealing with complex iteration-based engineering design process where little information on the expected outcomes may be known a priori, or where product performance is computationally expensive to evaluate. Application of this robust design metric in a multi-stage experimentation and modeling design process is presented. The characteristics of the proposed design metric and the effectiveness of the overall design procedure in dealing with constrained engineering design problems are examined with the aid of demonstrative case studies and the results are discussed.     

More than Just Robust Design: Why Product Development Organizations Still Contend with Variation and its Impact on Quality

Current market conditions require design and manufacturing companies to continually increase product functionality, reduce design cycles, decrease cost and improve quality. One way to improve quality is to minimize the impact part and process variation has on final product quality. Although companies know they must reduce variation, they are still struggling with executing coherent variation management strategies. To understand why companies still fail to systematically address variation, an ideal model of variation management is proposed, entitled Variation Risk Management (VRM). This model was used to assess the state of industry practice. These results are compared to the current literature available on the subject. It was found that many problems with industry implementation are due to a lack of quantitative models that enable a design team to make quick and accurate decisions. This paper concludes with a list of interesting challenges facing the VRM field.     

CADOM: A Component Agent-based Design-Oriented Model for Collaborative Design

Information technology is the foundation for collaborative design. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of the current research on product modeling, and a schema for a Design-Oriented Model (DOM) containing functional, structural and management data is proposed. The functional data explains the design purpose, function, object behavior and design rationale; the management data is for keeping the consistency of the model data, capturing the evolution process and controlling the operation action and authority; the structural data is the core of the model data. The integration of functional and management data directs the model towards design integration in place of application integration. The modeling system adopts the Component Agent (CA) mechanism that represents a complex product in an intelligent, autonomous hierarchy. A CA encapsulates the DOM data and consists of a definer, a communicator, an adaptor and a manager. These units are responsible for defining the model data, interacting with other agents, deriving special data and managing the constraints, version, authority and operation. Finally, several aspect supporting the collaborative design enabled by the CADOM (CA-based DOM) are discussed, as the multi-views model, the semantics communication between perspectives, the dynamic constraints management, the version and authority management, and the product and process integration. The discussion indicate that the model is an information infrastructure with more capabilities for collaborative design.     

Designing Assemblies

This paper presents a theory to support the design of assemblies. It brings together prior work in a new synthesis, resulting in a top-down process for designing assemblies so that they deliver geometric Key Characteristics (KCs) that achieve top level customer requirements. The theory applies to assemblies that take the form of mechanisms (e.g. engines) or structures (e.g. aircraft fuselages), but has less relevance to assemblies that take the form of connective or distributive systems (e.g. hydraulic piping). The theory shows how kinematically constrained (statically determinate) assemblies can be unambiguously designed to satisfy geometrically-defined customer requirements. The top-down process presented here begins by creating a kinematic constraint structure and a systematic scheme by which parts are located in space relative to each other, followed by declaration of assembly features that join parts in such a way as to create the desired constraint relationships. This process captures design intent by creating a connective data model that contains information to support relevant analyses such as variation buildup, constraint analysis, and establishment of constraint-consistent assembly sequences. Adjustable assemblies, assemblies built using fixtures, and selective assemblies can also be described by this theory. Problems arising from multiple KCs and KC conflict can be identified. Issues unresolved by the theory are also noted.