An International Marine-Atmospheric 222Rn Measurement Intercomparison in Bermuda Part II: Results for the Participating Laboratories

As part of an international measurement intercomparison of instruments used to measure atmospheric ²²²Rn, four participating laboratories made nearly simultaneous measurements of ²²²Rn activity concentration in commonly sampled, ambient air over approximately a 2 week period, and three of these four laboratories participated in the measurement comparison of 14 introduced samples with known, but undisclosed (“blind”) ²²²Rn activity concentration. The exercise was conducted in Bermuda in October 1991. The ²²²Rn activity concentrations in ambient Bermudian air over the course of the intercomparison ranged from a few hundredths of a Bq · m⁻³ to about 2 Bq · m⁻³, while the standardized sample additions covered a range from approximately 2.5 Bq · m⁻³ to 35 Bq · m⁻³. The overall uncertainty in the latter concentrations was in the general range of 10 %, approximating a 3 standard deviation uncertainty interval. The results of the intercomparison indicated that two of the laboratories were within very good agreement with the standard additions, and almost within expected statistical variations. These same two laboratories, however, at lower ambient concentrations, exhibited a systematic difference with an averaged offset of roughly 0.3 Bq · m⁻³. The third laboratory participating in the measurement of standardized sample additions was systematically low by about 65 % to 70 %, with respect to the standard addition which was also confirmed in their ambient air concentration measurements. The fourth laboratory, participating in only the ambient measurement part of the intercomparison, was also systematically low by at least 40 % with respect to the first two laboratories.     

Radiochemical evaluation of groundwater around Mika uranium mineralization and environs

Seventeen groundwater samples around Mika uranium mineralization were collected, and the ²²²Rn concentrations were measured using a DURRIDGE RAD7 electronic radon detector. The ²²²Rn concentrations in the groundwater ranged from 2350 to 46200 Bq m^–3 with an average of 29 400 Bq m^–3. The results show that 76.5% of the groundwater samples collected have ²²²Rn concentrations far above the US EPA maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 11.1 Bq L^–1 (for states without radon monitoring policy and enhanced indoor air programs), and only 23.5% have lower values. On the other hand, all the ²²²Rn levels were below the MCL of 100 Bq L^–1, recommended by EU as the level that warrants consideration of possible remedial actions. Borehole samples show relatively higher ²²²Rn concentrations than samples collected from open wells. The annual effective dose due to ingestion (H _ing) of ²²²Rn in the groundwater ranged from 0.05 to 0.92 mSv, with an average of 0.59 mSv. These values are within the ICRP recommended reference level of 1 mSv year^–1 for the intake of the radionuclide in water by the general public for a prolonged exposure.     

Preparation and Calibration of Carrier-Free 209Po Solution Standards

Carrier-free ²⁰⁹Po solution standards have been prepared and calibrated. The standards, which will be disseminated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology as Standard Reference Material SRM 4326, consist of (5.1597 ±0.0024) g of a solution of polonium in nominal 2 mol · L⁻¹ hydrochloric acid (having a solution density of (1.031±0.004) g · mL⁻¹ at 22 °C) that is contained in 5 mL flame-sealed borosilicate glass ampoules, and are certified to contain a ²⁰⁹Po alpha-particle emission rate concentration of (85.42±0.29) s⁻¹ · g⁻¹ (corresponding to a ²⁰⁹Po activity concentration of (85.83 ±0.30) Bq · g⁻¹) as of the reference time of 1200 EST 15 March 1994. The calibration was based on 4πα liquid scintillation (LS) measurements with two different LS counting systems and under wide variations in measurement and sample conditions. Confirmatory measurements by 2πα gas-flow proportional counting were also performed. The only known radionuclidic impurity, based on α- and photon-emission spectrometry, is a trace quantity of ²⁰⁸Po. The ²⁰⁸Po to ²⁰⁹Po impurity ratio as of the reference time was 0.00124 ±0.00020. All of the above cited uncertainty intervals correspond to a combined standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor of k = 2. Although ²⁰⁹Po is nearly a pure α emitter with only a weak electron capture branch to ²⁰⁹Bi, LS measurements of the ²⁰⁹Po a decay are confounded by an a transition to a 2.3 keV (J^π= 1/2⁻) level in ²⁰⁵Pb which was previously unknown to be a delayed isomeric state.     

<Superscript>220</Superscript>Rn as an additional factor of radiation hazard in the Shelter

In 2003–2007, the content of ²¹²Pb (²²⁰Rn daughter product) inside the Shelter was, as a rule, in the range 0.5–5 Bq m⁻³. No seasonal and time dynamics of the ²¹²Pb concentration and no relationship with the technical activity were revealed. At simultaneous sampling of aerosols, the volume activities of ²¹²Pb in the bypass were higher by 1–2 orders of magnitude than in the surrounding medium (local zone). Hence, the sources of ²²⁰Rn emanation, in particular, ²³²U are inside the Shelter. Among 220 samples taken in the bypass, 94% had the activity median aerodynamic diameter of aerosol particles bearing ²²²Rn and ²²⁰Rn daughter products in the range from 0.05 to 0.4 μm. For the Shelter staff members, ²²²Rn and ²²⁰Rn daughter products, and also submicron size of their carriers are negative factors which were not taken into account previously when determining ionizing irradiation doses. The additional inhalation doses can reach tens of percents of the permissible annual dose.     

Calibration of Electret-Based Integral Radon Monitors Using NIST Polyethylene-Encapsulated 226Ra/222Rn Emanation (PERE) Standards

The recently developed ²²²Rn emanation standards that are based on polyethylene-encapsulated ²²⁶Ra solutions were employed for a first field-measurement application test to demonstrate their efficacy in calibrating passive integral radon monitors. The performance of the capsules was evaluated with respect to the calibration needs of electret ionization chambers (E-PERM^®, Rad Elec Inc.). The encapsulated standards emanate well-characterized and known quantities of ²²²Rn, and were used in two different-sized, relatively-small, accumulation vessels (about 3.6 L and 10 L) which also contained the deployed electret monitors under test. Calculated integral ²²²Rn activities from the capsules over various accumulation times were compared to the averaged electret responses. Evaluations were made with four encapsulated standards ranging in ²²⁶Ra activity from approximately 15 Bq to 540 Bq (with ²²²Rn emanation fractions of 0.888); over accumulation times from 1 d to 33 d; and with four different types of E-PERM detectors that were independently calibrated. The ratio of the electret chamber response E_Rn to the integral ²²²Rn activity I_Rn was constant (within statistical variations) over the variables of the specific capsule used, the accumulation volume, accumulation time, and detector type. The results clearly demonstrated the practicality and suitability of the encapsulated standards for providing a simple and readily-available calibration for those measurement applications. However, the mean ratio E_Rn/I_Rn was approximately 0.91, suggesting a possible systematic bias in the extant E-PERM calibrations. This 9 % systematic difference was verified by an independent test of the E-PERM calibration based on measurements with the NIST radon-in-water standard generator.     

36Cl/Cl Accelerator-Mass-Spectrometry Standards: Verification of Their Serial-Dilution-Solution Preparations by Radioactivity Measurements

A consortium of accclerator-mass-spectrometry (AMS) laboratories recently prepared a series of ³⁶Cl/Cl isotopic ratio AMS standards by an eight-step serial gravimetric dilution scheme. Of the resulting nine solutions, only the latter six could be assayed by AMS to confirm the gravimetric dilution factors. This paper provides the results of relative radioactivity measurements on the first four solutions to verify the first three dilution factors. The fourth solution was the only dilution capable of being directly measured by both AMS and radionuclidic metrology of ³⁶Cl, and therefore its assay by radioactivity counting was deemed of considerable importance. Assays were performed by 4πβ⁻ liquid scintillation (LS) counting of gravimetric aliquots of the solutions, with confirmatory measurements by 2πβ⁻ gas-flow proportional counting of gravimetrically-prepared solid sources. The radioactivity measurements on the fourth solution were complex and difficult because of the conflicting combination of a low activity concentration (0.036 Bq · g⁻¹) and high salt content (146 mg NaCl per g of solution). These conditions necessitated independent studies of the ³⁶Cl LS efficiency as a function of NaCl loading in the LS cocktails and of the feasibility of LS counting of precipitated samples, both of which are also reported here. The results of the radioactivity measurements confirmed the dilution factors for the first three solutions to absolute differences of about 1%, and that for the fourth solution to about 1% to 2%. The overall uncertainties for these verification measurements, at a relative three standard deviation uncertainty interval, were of comparable magnitude, i.e., in the range of ±1% to ±2% for the first three solutions and roughly ±3% for the fourth solution.     

Interlaboratory Comparison of Magnetic Thin Film Measurements

A potential low magnetic moment standard reference material (SRM) was studied in an interlaboratory comparison. The mean and the standard deviation of the saturation moment m_s, the remanent moment m_r, and the intrinsic coercivity H_c of nine samples were extracted from hysteresis-loop measurements. Samples were measured by thirteen laboratories using inductive-field loopers, vibrating-sample magnetometers, alternating-gradient force magnetometers, and superconducting quantum-interference-device magnetometers. NiFe films on Si substrates had saturation moment measurements reproduced within 5 % variation among the laboratories. The results show that a good candidate for an SRM must have a highly square hysteresis loop (m_r/m_s > 90 %), H_c ≈ 400 A·m⁻¹ (5 Oe), and m_s ≈ 2 × 10⁻⁷ A·m² (2 × 10⁻⁴ emu).     

Thermal Conductivity of Magnesium Oxide From Absolute,Steady-State Measurements

The thermal conductivity of polycrystalline magnesium oxide has been measured over the temperature range from 400 K to 1300 K using a modified guarded-hot-plate design. Three different thicknesses of specimens having 93 % of theoretical density were tested to verify the operation, accuracy, and reproducibility of our apparatus. The measured thermal conductivity ranges from 30 W · m⁻¹ · K⁻¹ down to 8 W · m⁻¹ · K⁻¹ and has an inverse-temperature functionality. The results agree well with literature values for this material.     

Thermal-Conductivity Apparatus for Steady-State,Comparative Measurement of Ceramic Coatings

An apparatus has been developed to measure the thermal conductivity of ceramic coatings. Since the method uses an infrared microscope for temperature measurement, coatings as thin as 20 μm can, in principle, be measured using this technique. This steady-state, comparative measurement method uses the known thermal conductivity of the substrate material as the reference material for heat-flow measurement. The experimental method is validated by measuring a plasma-sprayed coating that has been previously measured using an absolute, steady-state measurement method. The new measurement method has a relative standard uncertainty of about 10 %. The measurement of the plasma-sprayed coating gives 0.58 W·m⁻¹·K^−l which compares well with the 0.62 W·m⁻¹·K^−l measured using the absolute method.     

Standardization of 63Ni by 4πβ Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry With 3H-Standard Efficiency Tracing

The low energy (E_βmax = 66.945 keV ± 0.004 keV) β-emitter ⁶³Ni has become increasingly important in the field of radionuclidic metrology. In addition to having a low β-endpoint energy, the relatively long half-life (101.1 a ± 1.4 a) makes it an appealing standard for such applications. This paper describes the recent preparation and calibration of a new solution Standard Reference Material of ⁶³Ni, SRM 4226C, released by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The massic activity C_A for these standards was determined using 4πβ liquid scintillation (LS) spectrometry with ³H-standard efficiency tracing using the CIEMAT/NIST method, and is certified as 50.53 kBq ·g⁻¹ ± 0.46 Bq · g⁻¹ at the reference time of 1200 EST August 15, 1995. The uncertainty given is the expanded (coverage factor k = 2 and thus a 2 standard deviation estimate) uncertainty based on the evaluation of 28 different uncertainty components. These components were evaluated on the basis of an exhaustive number (976) of LS counting measurements investigating over 15 variables. Through the study of these variables it was found that LS cocktail water mass fraction and ion concentration play important roles in cocktail stability and consistency of counting results. The results of all of these experiments are discussed.     

Light Scattering by Commercial Sugar Solutions

Using a direct measure of scattered light, it was found that commercial sugar solutions scatter light predominantly in a forward direction. The scattering at angles less than 30° was as much as one hundred times that at right angles to the incident beam.It was found that the light scattering by commercial sugar solutions is inversely dependent on wavelength to a power of between 2 and 3, and that severe multiple scattering occurs when the turbidity of the solution is larger than 2×10⁻¹cm⁻¹ at 436 mµ. The scattering of commercial sugar solutions is compared with that of highly purified sucrose.A method is discussed that will enable a good approximation of the turbidity of commercial sugar solutions to be made from a single forward scattering measurement at an angle of about 20° with respect to the incident light beam. A correction for scattered light in transmission measurements of these solutions is also introduced.     

Self-Broadening of Carbon Monoxide in the 2 v and 3 v Bands

The self-broadening of carbon monoxide has been measured for the 2 v and 3 v bands with pressures up to 3.5 atmospheres. A grating spectrometer of high resolving power was used for the measurements and the correction for finite slits was small. The corrections varied from 3 to 20 percent for the different conditions of measurement. The half-widths per atmosphere, γ°, decreased from 0.089 cm⁻¹ for |m| = 1 to 0.053 cm⁻¹ for |m| = 21. The half-widths are compared with those obtained by other investigators and it is shown that the results reported in this work fall in between the self-broadening values previously obtained.     

Electronic conduction in La-based perovskite-type oxides

A systematic study of La-based perovskite-type oxides from the viewpoint of their electronic conduction properties was performed. LaCo_0.5Ni_0.5O_3±δ was found to be a promising candidate as a replacement for standard metals used in oxide electrodes and wiring that are operated at temperatures up to 1173 K in air because of its high electrical conductivity and stability at high temperatures. LaCo_0.5Ni_0.5O_3±δ exhibits a high conductivity of 1.9 × 10³ S cm⁻¹ at room temperature (R.T.) because of a high carrier concentration n of 2.2 × 10²² cm⁻³ and a small effective mass m∗ of 0.10 m_e. Notably, LaCo_0.5Ni_0.5O_3±δ exhibits this high electrical conductivity from R.T. to 1173 K, and little change in the oxygen content occurs under these conditions. LaCo_0.5Ni_0.5O_3±δ is the most suitable for the fabrication of oxide electrodes and wiring, though La_1−xSr_xCoO_3±δ and La_1−xSr_xMnO_3±δ also exhibit high electronic conductivity at R.T., with maximum electrical conductivities of 4.4 × 10³ S cm⁻¹ for La_0.5Sr_0.5CoO_3±δ and 1.5 × 10³ S cm⁻¹ for La_0.6Sr_0.4MnO_3±δ because oxygen release occurs in La_1−xSr_xCoO_3±δ as elevating temperature and the electrical conductivity of La_0.6Sr_0.4MnO_3±δ slightly decreases at temperatures above 400 K.     

A study of indoor 220Rn and 222Rn decay product concentrations in the UK

In order to gain a better understanding of the risk of human exposure to 220Rn indoors, measurements of 220Rn decay products have been performed in a number of houses in England. The study focused mainly on areas where above-average indoor 220Rn concentrations were to be expected because of geological or other factors. Thoron (220Rn) in room air comes mainly from the building materials, with an additional contribution from soil gas; therefore, 220Rn concentrations were examined in relation to building materials as well as location. Measurements were carried out in 23 houses. The mean equilibrium equivalent 220Rn (EET) concentration found was 0.39 Bq m-3 and the mean equilibrium equivalent 222Rn (EER) concentration was 17.8 Bq m-3. The 220Rn concentration values and EET/EER ratios found in this investigation correspond well with other published results. Values imply that the 220Rn concentrations in English dwellings are a far less important problem than 222Rn concentrations.     

Experimental and Theoretical Study of Kinetics of Bulk Crystallization in Poly(Chlorotrifluoroethylene)

The rate of isothermal bulk crystallization of poly(chlorotrifluoroethylene), T_m=221° C, was measured from 170° to 200° C. The intrinsic bulk crystallization, which accurately followed an n = 2 law, was shown to be a result of the injection of primary nuclei sporadically in time, with one-dimensional growth of centers derived from these nuclei. The crystallites are exceedingly small. The one-dimensional growth process was isolated by nucleating specimens with seed crystals, and its temperature-dependence determined between 191° and 205° C. The seed crystal isotherms followed an n = 1 law. The temperature coefficients of the rate of nucleation and the rate of growth were both strongly negative.A theory of homogeneous nucleation that takes into account the segmental character of the polymer chains is developed in some detail. A cylindrical nucleus is assumed. In the temperature range near the melting point, region A, where the radius and length of the nucleus are unrestricted, the rate of nucleation is shown to be proportional to exp(−α/T³ΔT²). The nucleation rate is proportional to exp (−β/T²ΔT) in region B, which extends from somewhat below the melting point to considerably lower temperatures; the length of the nucleus has a constant value l₀ in this region, but the radius is unrestricted. (In the above expressions, α and β are constants). Finally, at sufficiently low temperatures, region C is entered. Under certain circumstances, the rate of nucleation in region C will be extremely rapid, and correspond to a “nucleative collapse” of the supercooled liquid state. A calculation of the one-dimensional growth rate shows that it is proportional to exp(−γ/T²ΔT) where β=γ.A careful analysis of the experimental data obtained between 170° and 200° C clearly showed that both the rate of nucleation and the rate of growth were proportional to exp(−β/T²ΔT), and not exp(−α/T³ΔT²). The primary nucleation event was thus of type B in this interval. A detailed analysis of the data is given, and surface free energies and the dimensions of the nuclei quoted. Quenching experiments, where the polymer was crystallized well below 170° C, gave a firm indication of the existence of region C.An experimental study was made of the extremely slow crystallization process that prevailed when the degree of crystallinity became high. The onset of this stage of the crystallization was interpreted as being the result of a massive degree of impingement. This interpretation is justified by the calculations of Lauritzen, who has given a theory of impingements that predicts a pseudoequilibrium degree of crystallinity.As indicated above, the growth process originating at homogeneous nuclei is not of a three-dimensional or spherulitic character in the region of study. Such stray spherulites as do appear in this region are shown to originate at heterogeneities. The possibility that the intrinsic growth process may become three-dimensional at crystallization temperatures sufficiently near T_m is discussed.     

Low-cost and fast synthesis of nanoporous silica cryogels for thermal insulation applications

Nanoporous silica cryogels with a high specific surface area of 1095 m² g⁻¹ were fabricated using tert-butyl alcohol as a reaction solvent, via a cost-effective sol–gel process followed by vacuum freeze drying. The total time of cryogel production was reduced markedly to one day. The molar ratio of solvent/precursor, which was varied from 5 to 13, significantly affected the porous structure and thermal insulating properties of the cryogels. The silica cryogels with low densities in the range of 0.08–0.18 g cm⁻³ and thermal conductivities as low as 6.7 mW (m·K)⁻¹ at 100 Pa and 28.3 mW (m·K)⁻¹ at 10⁵ Pa were obtained using this new technique.     

Calcium Fluoride Precipitation and Deposition From 12 mmol/L Fluoride Solutions With Different Calcium Addition Rates

The effects of different Ca-addition rates on calcium fluoride (CaF₂) precipitation and deposition were investigated in 12 mmol/L sodium fluoride solutions to which 0.1 mol/L calcium chloride solution was continuously added at average rates of (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15 or 20) mmol L⁻¹ min⁻¹. The changes in ionic fluoride and calcium concentrations, as well as turbidity, were continuously recorded by F and Ca electrodes, and a fiber optic based spectrophotometer, respectively. The F⁻ concentration decreased and turbidity increased with time indicating precipitation of CaF₂. For the systems with Ca-addition rates of (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, and 20) mmol L⁻¹ min⁻¹, the 1 min CaF₂ depositions in the model substrate (cellulose filter paper, pores 0.2 µm) expressed as mean ± SD of deposited F per substrate surface area were (3.78 ± 0.31, 11.45 ± 0.89, 9.31 ± 0.68, 8.20 ± 0.56, 6.63 ± 0.43, and 2.09 ± 0.28) µg/cm², respectively (n = 10 for each group). The 1-min F depositions did not show positive correlation to Ca-addition rates. The lowest 1-min F deposition was obtained in the systems with the highest Ca-addition rate of 20 mmol L⁻¹ min⁻¹ for which CaF₂ precipitation rate reached the maximum value of 0.31 mmol L⁻¹ s⁻¹ almost immediately after beginning of reaction (6 s). The largest 1-min F depositions were obtained from the systems with Ca addition rates of (7.5 to 12.5) mmol L⁻¹ min⁻¹ in which CaF₂ precipitation rates continuously increased reaching the maximum values of (0.13 to 0.20) mmol L⁻¹ s⁻¹ after (18 to 29) s, respectively. The 1-min F depositions were greatly enhanced in comparison with the control F solutions that did not have continuous Ca-addition. This indicates that continuous Ca addition that controls the rate of CaF₂ formation could be a critical factor for larger F depositions from F solutions. The efficacy of conventional F mouthrinses could be improved with addition of a substance that continuously releases Ca.     

The “1958 He4 Scale of Temperatures”: Part 1. Introduction

The generally used practical scale of temperatures between 1° and 5.2° K is the He⁴ vapor pressure scale based on an accepted vapor pressure equation or table. In Sèvres (near Paris), October 1958, the International Committee on Weights and Measures recommended for international use the “1958 He⁴ Scale” based on a vapor pressure table arrived at through international cooperation and agreement. This table resulted from a consideration of all reliable He⁴ vapor pressure data obtained using gas thermometers, and paramagnetic susceptibility and carbon resistor thermometers. The theoretical vapor pressure equation from statistical thermodynamics was used with thermodynamic data on liquid He⁴ and the vapor equation of state to insure satisfactory agreement of the vapor pressure table with reliable thermodynamic data.The International Committee on Weights and Measures at a meeting in Sèvres (near Paris), France, September 29 to October 3, 1958, approved the “1958 He⁴ Vapor Pressure Scale of Temperatures” as an international standard for thermometry from 1° to 5.2° K. This was the culmination of several years of intensive research and cooperation on the helium vapor pressure scale at the Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory in Leiden, Holland, and the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington.The vapor pressure of liquid He⁴ has for a long time been used as a standard for thermometry between 1° and 5.2° K. The first measurements of thermodynamic temperatures in the liquid He⁴ range were made with constant volume gas thermometers filled with He⁴. Simultaneous measurements of the vapor pressure of liquid helium in temperature equilibrium with the gas thermometer established a vapor pressure-temperature relation which then was used as the basis for determining thermodynamic temperatures from vapor pressure measurements. With these vapor pressure-gas thermometer measurements there were measurements of He⁴ vapor pressures made simultaneously with measurements of the He⁴ isotherms from which temperatures were obtained by extrapolating the isotherms to zero density (N/V→0) in accordance with the virial equation of state: pV/N = RT[1 + B(N/V) + C(N/V)² + …](1)After the latent and specific heats of liquid He⁴ had been measured, the experimental vapor pressure-temperature relation was improved through the use of the theoretical vapor pressure (P) equation: lnP=i0−L0RT+52lnT−1RT∫0TSldT+1RT∫0PVldP+ϵ(2)where i₀ ≡ ln (2πm)^3/2k^5/2/h³(3)and ? ≡ ln (PV/NRT)?2B (N/V)?(3/2) C (N/V)²(4)L₀ is the heat of vaporization of liquid He⁴ at 0° K, S_l and V_l are the molar entropy and volume of liquid He⁴, m is the mass of a He⁴ atom, B and C are the virial coefficients in eq (1), and the other symbols have their usual meaning. Both theoretically calculated and directly measured vapor pressures were considered in arriving at the 1958 He⁴ Temperature Scale.Equation (2) presupposes that the thermodynamic properties entering the equation have been measured on the thermodynamic scale, otherwise the use of this equation for the calculation of P is not valid. In practice, however, these properties are measured on an empirical scale that only approximates the thermodynamic scale. In general this empirical scale has been a He⁴ vapor pressure scale based on gas thermometer measurements.As T is lowered, the fourth, fifth, and sixth terms in eq (2) become smaller and less important relative to the first three terms. At 1.5° K, the inclusion or exclusion of the sum of the fourth, fifth, and sixth terms in eq (2) affects the temperature calculated from a given value of P by only 0.0005 deg. It may be said then, that below 1.5° K, the vapor pressure of He⁴ is in effect really determined, within the present accuracy of the vapor pressure measurement, by a single empirical constant, the heat of vaporization of liquid He⁴ at 0° K. At present, L_o for He⁴ is normally calculated from vapor pressure data obtained with a gas thermometer. The magnitude of the last three terms in eq (2) increases rather rapidly with rising T, and above the λ-point (2.172° K) the accuracy of the evaluation of these terms is a very important consideration.In Amsterdam in 1948, on the occasion of a General Assembly of the International Union of Physics, a small group of low temperature physicists, meeting informally, agreed to use and recommend for temperature measurements between 1° and 5.2° K, a table of vapor pressures of He⁴, then in use in Leiden, which came to be known as the “1948 Scale” [1].⁵ This scale has sometimes been referred to as the “1949” Scale. From 1° to 1.6°K, the “1948 Scale” was based on vapor pressures calculated by Bleaney and Simon [2] using eq (2). From 1.6° to 5.2° K, the scale was based on measured vapor pressures and temperatures determined with gas thermometers. From 1.6° to 4.2° K, it was based primarily on the vapor pressure measurements of Schmidt and Keesom [3].Even in 1948, when the “1948 Scale” was agreed to, there was evidence in the measurements and calculations of Kistemaker [4] that the “1948 Scale” deviated significantly from the thermodynamic scale. However, it was thought at the time that, on general principles, indicated changes in an existing scale should be made only after these changes had been confirmed. With improvements in the precision and accuracy of physical measurements at low temperatures, irregularities appeared in the temperature variation of physical properties between 1° and 5° K that were in the main reproducible in different substances and properties and were, therefore, attributable to errors in the “1948 Scale” [5]. Stimulated by these results which corroborated Kistemaker’s work, the investigations of the He⁴ vapor pressure scale were undertaken that culminated in the “1958 He⁴ Scale.”Paramagnetic susceptibility and carbon resistor thermometers were later employed in investigations of the He⁴ vapor pressure-temperature relation [6]. These thermometers were used for the interpolation of temperatures between calibration points (temperatures) using an assumed relation connecting temperature and paramagnetic susceptibility or carbon resistance for the calculation of the temperatures. For suitably chosen paramagnetic salts, the Curie-Weiss Law was assumed to hold: χ=CT+Δ(5)where χ is the magnetic susceptibility and C and Δ are empirical constants. Measurements at two temperatures would suffice to determine these two empirical constants if the measurement were really of χ or a quantity directly proportional to χ. However, a calibration of the paramagnetic thermometer at a third calibration temperature is necessary because the arbitrariness in the size and arrangement of the paramagnetic salt samples and the induction coils that surround the salt sample for the susceptibility measurement make the measurement a linear function of χ. Interpolation equations for carbon resistor thermometers are not as simple as eq (5) and do not have a theoretical basis. Hence, vapor pressure data obtained with carbon resistor thermometers are of more limited usefulness for the determination of the He⁴ vapor pressure-temperature relation. Clement used carbon thermometer data to examine the derivative d (ln P)/d (1/T), [7].Important use has been made of He⁴ vapor pressure measurements made with magnetic susceptibility and carbon resistor thermometers in arriving at the “1958 He⁴ Scale.” These vapor pressure measurements were considered along with those made with gas thermometers and vapor pressures calculated using eq (2). Temperature measurements with magnetic and carbon resistor thermometers are much simpler to make than measurements with gas thermometers, and hence vapor pressure data obtained with magnetic and carbon resistor thermometers are more numerous. Also, the measurements made with these secondary thermometers are more precise (to be distinguished from accurate) which makes them especially useful for interpolation between the gas thermometer data.There are, accordingly, three practical methods for determining the He⁴ vapor pressure-temperature relation: (1) By use of the direct vapor pressure measurements made with gas thermometers, (2) through the use of eq (2) with some vapor pressure-gas thermometer data, and (3) through the use of vapor pressure measurements with secondary thermometers which have been calibrated using some gas thermometer data. If all the pertinent experimental data were accurate and all temperatures were on the thermodynamic scale, these three methods would yield results in good agreement with each other, and any one might be relied upon for the construction of the He⁴ vapor pressure-temperature table defining the scale. Because of experimental errors, however, the vapor pressures obtained by the different methods differ when carried to the limit of the sensitivity of the measurements. For He⁴ between 1° and 4.5° K, different choices of the methods and different selections of the experimental data used, weighting factors and corrections to the published data yield scales all within about 4 millidegrees of each other. The primary evidence for this is that 4 millidegrees is the maximum difference between the L55 Scale [8] obtained by method (2) and the 55E Scale [9] obtained by method (3). This then is a measure of the range (total spread) of uncertainty at present in the He⁴ vapor pressure scale of temperatures between 1° and 4.5° K.All published He⁴ vapor pressure measurements, and thermodynamic data needed for eq (2) were independently studied and correlated by H. Van Dijk and M. Durieux at the Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory in Leiden [8] and by J. R. Clement and J. K. Logan at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory in Washington [9]. As far as possible, the experimental data of the original investigators were recalculated on the basis of later knowledge of the temperature scale, fundamental constants, and the properties of He⁴. In some cases, limitations were imposed on these recalculations by the incomplete reporting of the experimental data by the original investigator.After working independently, van Dijk and Clement cooperated to compromise their differences. They met first in Leiden, August 1955 and later in Washington, summer of 1957. From January 22 to March 14, 1958, Logan worked at Leiden, and later represented Clement at a conference in Leiden, June 1958, at which agreement was reached on the “1958 He⁴ Scale.” This cooperation was an important factor in the improvement of the scale.Where the differences between the values obtained by handling the experimental data differently are largest (4 millidegrees), the “1958 Scale” falls between the extremes. At other places it is close to the mean of these values and at no place does it deviate by more than 2 millidegrees from the mean. The estimated uncertainty of the “1958 He⁴ Scale” is accordingly ±2 millidegrees between 1° and 4.5° K. At higher temperatures, the estimated uncertainty is larger.Now that the International Committee on Weights and Measures has recommended the “1958 He⁴ Scale” as an international standard it is presumed that henceforth the International Committee on Weights and Measures will take the initiative in improving the scale when changes are needed. Before the International Committee on Weights and Measures assumed responsibility for the He⁴ vapor pressure scale, the Commission on Very Low Temperature Physics in the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics concerned itself with the scale. This began with the informal meeting in Amsterdam in 1948 that resulted in the “1948 Scale.” At the Low Temperature Conferences sponsored by the Commission on Very Low Temperature Physics of the International Union of Physics at Paris in 1955, and at Madison, Wisconsin, in 1957, sessions were held at which the He⁴ vapor pressure scale of temperatures was discussed.The National Bureau of Standards sponsored meetings, for discussion of the helium vapor pressure scale of temperatures, held at the NBS during the spring meetings of the American Physical Society in Washington, 1955 and 1957. Also, the NBS encouraged cooperation in reaching national and international agreement on the scale. It initiated or promoted the meetings for discussion of the differences between the L55 and 55E Scales proposed respectively by Van Dijk and Durieux, and by Clement. These were the meetings held August 26 and 27, 1955 in Leiden (before the Low Temperature Conference in Paris) [10], July 30, 31, and August 1, 1957 in Washington (before the Low Temperature Conference in Madison) [11], and June 13, 14, and 16, 1958 in Leiden (before the meeting of the Advisory Committee on Thermometry of the International Committee on Weights and Measures in Sèvres) [12]. Also, the National Bureau of Standards promoted the arrangement which sent Dr. Logan of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory to work in the Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory from January 22, to March 14, 1958.The Scale agreed upon at Leiden, June 13 to 16, 1958 was presented to the Advisory Committee on Thermometry of the International Committee on Weights and Measures at its meeting in Sèvres, June 20 and 21, 1958. The recommendation of the Advisory Committee to the International Committee was as follows [12]:

• “Le Comité Consultatif de Thermométrie,
• “avant reconnu la nécessité d’établir dans le domaine des très basses températures une échelle de température unique,
• “ayant constaté l’accord général des spécialistes dans ce domaine de la physique,
• “recommande pour l’usage général l’ “Echelle ⁴He 1958,” basée sur la tension de vapeur de l’hélium, comme définie par la table annexée.
• “Les valeur des températures dans cette échelle sont désignées par le symbole T₅₈.”

The table of He⁴ vapor pressures that was sent to the International Committee with this recommendation was the table distributed at the Kamerlingh Onnes Conference on Low Temperature Physics at Leiden, June 23 to 28, 1958. It was published in the Proceedings of the Kamerlingh Onnes Conference [13].On the recommendation of its Advisory Committee on Thermometry, the International Committee on Weights and Measures approved the “1958 He⁴ Scale of Temperatures” at its meeting at Sèvres, September 29 to October 3, 1958.The table adopted by the International Committee on Weights and Measures was a table of vapor pressures at hundredth degree intervals. This table was expanded by Clement and Logan making table I of this paper with millidegree entries. Table I was inverted to give tables II and III which express T as a function of vapor pressures. Auxiliary tables were added including a table of the differences between the 1958 Scale and other earlier used scales. Linear interpolation is valid for all tables except at the lower temperature end of table IV.The assistance at Leiden of H. ter Harmsel and C. van Rijn, students of Dr. H. van Dijk at the Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, with the computations for the defining and auxiliary tables is gratefully acknowledged.Various members of the Cryogenics Branch of the Naval Research Laboratory at Washington assisted with numerous calculations which contributed toward the development of the present scale. This assistance, especially that of Dr. R. T. Swim, is gratefully acknowledged.     

Infrared Spectrum of the v2+ v6 Band of C13C12H6

The infrared spectrum of the v₂+v₆ band of C¹³C¹²H₆ has been analyzed and a value of B₀= 0.64865 ±0.00005 cm⁻¹ determined. When this value is combined with that found in recent work on isotopically normal ethane, a “r_s” value of 1.527±0.004 A for the carboncarbon bond distance is obtained. (Uncertainties are probable errors.)