共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
以面包比容和感官评分为评价指标,采用单因素试验分析了黑小麦全麦粉、水、酵母、蔗糖添加量对面包品质的影响.通过响应面设计对黑小麦全麦面包的工艺配方进行优化,确定其最佳工艺配方,实验结果表明:以混合粉为基重,黑小麦全麦粉添加量为23%,水52%,酵母1.3%,蔗糖21%.采用优化工艺配方制作的全麦面包比容为5.21 cm3/g,综合评分为85.37.与普通面包相比,黑小麦全麦面包风味独特、质地柔软、老化速率明显降低,面包货架期延长,外观性状和内在品质均得到较大程度的改善. 相似文献
2.
《食品研究与开发》2015,(16)
在普通面包用料的基础上加入山楂粉和薄荷粉,采用一次发酵法制作山楂薄荷营养面包,通过单因素试验和正交试验研究,探讨山楂粉、薄荷粉和白砂糖的添加量对面包品质的影响。结果表明,影响山楂薄荷营养面包品质的主次因子为:山楂粉白砂糖薄荷。山楂薄荷营养面包烘焙的最佳配方为:面包粉1 000 g、山楂粉10 g、薄荷粉1.0 g、白砂糖250 g、酵母12 g、奶粉53 g、面粉改良剂6 g、鸡蛋100 g、食盐10 g、无水酥油100 g。按此配方研制成的山楂薄荷营养面包表皮颜色金黄,瓤心微红有透明感,气孔膜薄,组织均匀,有淡淡的薄荷芳香和山楂的酸味,有营养保健作用。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
以不同全麦粉比例(50%、70%、90%、100%)的全麦面包为原料,通过分析不同全麦面包的色度和基本成分,并进行感官评价、人体血糖测试试验,研究不同比例全麦粉全麦面包感官品质和稳糖效果的变化。结果表明:随着全麦粉比例增加,不同全麦面包面包芯的颜色变深,4种全麦面包总体评分在76.57~83.29,都在消费者可接受范围内。以不同全麦粉比例(50%、70%、90%、100%)的全麦面包膳食纤维含量在相比于全麦粉比例为50%、70%的全麦面包,全麦粉比例为90%、100%的全麦面包膳食纤维含量显著增加(P<0.05),直链淀粉含量显著降低(P<0.05)。人体血糖值测试研究表明:不同全麦粉比例全麦面包血糖指数(Glycemic Index,GI)值分别为70.28、64.76、45.47、43.43,其中全麦比例为50%的全麦面包为高GI食品,全麦比例为70%的全麦面包为中GI食品,全麦比例为90%、100%的全麦面包为低GI食品。综上所述,相比于全麦粉比例为50%、70%的全麦面包,全麦粉比例为90%、100%的全麦面包面包品质和稳糖效果较好。该结果为轻食系列产品提供理论参考。 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
1.褐色面色就是全麦面包注意饮食健康的人,经常被食品的颜色所迷惑。褐色面包被看作是健康和营养价值更高的食品。殊不知,那只是面包师烘制面包时添加的食用色素,从而使褐色面包更具有诱人购买的色调。注意,褐色面包并不等于全麦面包,购买全麦面包最好看清标识。全麦食品中富含人体所需的多种维生素、矿物质、纤维素等,人在经过一夜的营养消耗后,体内所缺的营养素能 相似文献
10.
全麦食品以较高的营养价值在近几年受到许多消费者的青睐,全麦面包也在人们日益增长的消费需求中扮演着越来越重要的角色。通过对全麦面包中营养价值、风味物质的形成过程及检测方法分析、影响全麦面包风味的因素、发酵过程对全麦面包风味的影响、贮藏过程中面包风味的变化及全麦面包亟待解决的问题及改良途径等的阐述,说明了全麦面包中起主要作用的风味物质和加工生产、贮藏的研究进展,以期为全麦面包标准化、产业化生产的改良与完善提供参考。 相似文献
11.
12.
为了拓宽豌豆蛋白的产品范围,满足食品营养多样化的需求,本文研制一种在传统面包中添加豌豆蛋白粉的新型面包。以小麦粉为主要原料,辅以豌豆蛋白粉、大豆油、鸡蛋、奶粉、糖、盐、酵母与黄油等辅料,研制豌豆蛋白面包。以感官评价为指标,运用单因素实验和响应面分析法优化了豌豆蛋白面包的制作工艺条件,并对其品质进行评价。结果表明,最佳工艺条件为:豌豆蛋白粉添加量8%,酵母添加量1.5%,糖添加量8%,发酵时间60 min。此条件下制得的面包的感官评分为82分,水分含量35.8%,酸度值3.23,比容3.35 mL/g,持水性98.2%,口感得分20分,香味得分17分。因此,优化的工艺条件合理、可行,豌豆蛋白面包具有较好品质特性。 相似文献
13.
14.
黑甜玉米保健面包的研制 总被引:12,自引:0,他引:12
以小麦粉和特制黑甜玉米粉为主要原料,添加酵母、改良剂、白砂糖、奶粉、鸡蛋、食盐、白油、奶香粉等辅料,采取快速发酵法,经过做型、醒发、烘烤、冷却等工序制成面包成品。本文主要介绍了黑甜玉米保健面包的加工工艺过程,通过正交实验确定了该产品的最佳配方,并对生产中容易出现的质量问题进行了分析讨论,提出了注意事项。 相似文献
15.
16.
Abstract: The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the capability of electronic (E) nose technology to discriminate refined and whole wheat bread made with white or red wheat bran according to their headspace volatiles. Whole wheat flour was formulated with a common refined flour from hard red spring wheat, blended at the 15% replacement level with bran milled from representative samples of one hard red and 2 hard white wheats. A commercial formula was used for breadmaking. Results varied according to the nature of the sample, that is, crust, crumb, or whole slices. Bread crust and crumb were completely discriminated. Crumb of whole wheat bread made with red bran was distinct from other bread types. When misclassified, whole wheat bread crumb with white bran was almost invariably identified as refined flour bread crumb. Using crust as the basis for comparisons, the largest difference in volatiles was between refined flour bread and whole wheat bread as a group. When refined flour bread crust was misclassified, samples tended to be confused with whole white wheat crust. Samples prepared from whole bread slices were poorly discriminated in general. E‐nose results indicated that whole wheat bread formulated with white bran was more similar in volatile makeup to refined flour bread compared to whole wheat bread made with red bran. The E‐nose appears to be very capable to accommodate differentiation of bread volatiles whose composition varies due to differences in flour or bran type. Practical Application: Consumer preference of bread made using refined flour in contrast to whole wheat flour is partly due to the different aroma of whole wheat bread. This study used an electronic nose to analyze bread volatiles, and showed that whole wheat bread incorporating white bran was different from counterpart bread made using red bran, and was closer in volatile makeup to “white” bread made without bran. Commercial millers and bakers can take advantage of these results to formulate whole wheat flour with brans of preferred type in order to foster increased consumption of whole wheat products which confer many favorable health benefits. 相似文献
17.
PETROS KEFALAS SAVAS KOTZAMANIDIS DIMITRIOS SABANIS ANASTASIA YUPSANI LIDA-AIKATERINI KEFALA ATHANASIOS KOKKALIS TRAIANOS YUPSANIS 《Journal of food quality》2009,32(5):644-668
Two ways of improving durum wheat bread-making quality were evaluated.
First, durum wheat (cultivar "Papadakis") was blended with bread wheat flour of good (A-flour) or medium (B-flour) quality (70% durum and 30% bread wheat flour). Durum wheat flour displayed the γ-gliadin 45 electrophoretic band and acceptable bread-making quality. Breads from flour blends had better volume, particularly the durum and A-flour blend. The addition of ascorbic and citric acid and malt flour improved dough rheological properties and thus bread volume, as well as staling rate and sensory characteristics. These were more pronounced in the blend of durum with B-flour.
Second, durum wheat flour alone was used to prepare chickpea sourdough-leavened bread, as flavor is important for consumer acceptance. With the addition only of salt, the chickpea sourdough-leavened durum wheat bread displayed acceptable loaf volume, distinguished flavor and longer shelf life compared with bread prepared with compressed baker's yeast.
One of the practical applications of this study is the possibility of using a common durum wheat cultivar instead of local varieties as is the case with traditional breads. Results of this work may be useful for promoting greater acceptance of durum wheat breads as well as expansion of the use of a traditional Mediterranean chickpea sourdough-leavened durum wheat bread with distinguished flavor and taste.
This work may serve as a guide for determining the quality of flours suitable for production of "home made" or "village" bread (which has high market value as specialty bread) by blending durum and bread wheat flours. Best results are obtained with good-quality bread wheat flour, regardless of the good quality of durum wheat cultivar used, together with the use of the dough improvers implemented in this work. 相似文献
First, durum wheat (cultivar "Papadakis") was blended with bread wheat flour of good (A-flour) or medium (B-flour) quality (70% durum and 30% bread wheat flour). Durum wheat flour displayed the γ-gliadin 45 electrophoretic band and acceptable bread-making quality. Breads from flour blends had better volume, particularly the durum and A-flour blend. The addition of ascorbic and citric acid and malt flour improved dough rheological properties and thus bread volume, as well as staling rate and sensory characteristics. These were more pronounced in the blend of durum with B-flour.
Second, durum wheat flour alone was used to prepare chickpea sourdough-leavened bread, as flavor is important for consumer acceptance. With the addition only of salt, the chickpea sourdough-leavened durum wheat bread displayed acceptable loaf volume, distinguished flavor and longer shelf life compared with bread prepared with compressed baker's yeast.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
One of the practical applications of this study is the possibility of using a common durum wheat cultivar instead of local varieties as is the case with traditional breads. Results of this work may be useful for promoting greater acceptance of durum wheat breads as well as expansion of the use of a traditional Mediterranean chickpea sourdough-leavened durum wheat bread with distinguished flavor and taste.
This work may serve as a guide for determining the quality of flours suitable for production of "home made" or "village" bread (which has high market value as specialty bread) by blending durum and bread wheat flours. Best results are obtained with good-quality bread wheat flour, regardless of the good quality of durum wheat cultivar used, together with the use of the dough improvers implemented in this work. 相似文献
18.
Pierre Gélinas Carole McKinnon 《International Journal of Food Science & Technology》2013,48(9):1956-1961
The bread‐making potential of flour may be roughly estimated by dough rheology, especially its tolerance to over‐mixing as determined with the farinograph. The objective of this study was to identify the relative effects of experimental conditions likely to affect dough mixing stability: mixer speed, temperature, salt, yeast and bread additives such as ascorbic acid and preservatives. The addition of 1–2% salt or ascorbic acid (50 mg kg?1 flour) improved dough mixing stability and counteracted the negative effect of bread preservatives. Mixing salted dough at slow speed (63 rpm) and 25 °C might be a more realistic bread‐making procedure for performing dough rheology assays with equipment such as the farinograph, compared to official methods (only flour and water, no salt; 30 °C). Amongst five bread wheat cultivars, differences existed in dough strengthening response to both salt and ascorbic acid, a property that may find application in wheat breeding and screening. 相似文献