Comparison of four digoxin immunoassays with respect to interference from digoxin-like immunoreactive factors

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of a new monoclonal digoxin assay with three polyclonal digoxin assays for their cross-reactivity to digoxin-like immunoreactive factors (DLIF) and digoxin metabolites. DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-six nondigitalized patient samples from 5 different groups: neonates, women in 3rd trimester pregnancy, and patients with liver or renal diseases, or undergoing organ transplants, and 139 samples from digoxin-treated patients of 4 categories (hospital sick, liver, renal, and outpatients) were compared in 4 different digoxin assays: (a) ACS Digoxin (ACS) developed for the automated chemiluminescent Ciba Corning ACS 180 system, (b) Baxter Stratus (Stratus, a fluoroimmunoassay), (c) Ciba-Corning Magic (Magic, a radioimmunoassay), and (d) an in-house radioimmunoassay (RIA). The ACS and RIA were also compared for their cross-reactivity to four principal digoxin metabolites. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Among the nondigitalized specimens, no significant DLIF interference was found for all 4 assays among the pregnant women or liver and transplant patients. However, the neonates registered high DLIF interference with Magic and RIA, but none for ACS or Stratus. DLIF interference in renal samples was highest in the Magic assay and lowest in RIA. Among the specimens with digoxin, a higher number of discrepant samples were found from the sick patients than from outpatients. In 75% of such discrepant samples, the ACS result was less than other assay results, suggesting DLIF as the probable cause. The two assays differed most in their cross-reactivity to the deglycated metabolites, digoxigenin and its mono-digitoxoside.     

Effects of benzodiazepine agonists on punished responding in pigeons and their relationship with clinical doses in humans

We evaluated the AxSYM troponin I (cTnI) immunoassay for assisting in the detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). At four sites, the total imprecision (CV) over 20 days was 6.3-10.2%. The minimum detectable concentration was 0.14 +/- 0.05 microgram/L. Comparison of cTnI measurements between the AxSYM and Stratus (n = 406) over the dynamic range of the AxSYM assay demonstrated good correlation, r = 0.881, with a proportional bias: AxSYM cTnI = 3.50(Stratus cTnI) - 1. 10. The confidence intervals (95%) for the slope and intercept were 3.39-3.64 and -1.32 to -0.95, respectively. The expected cTnI concentration in healthy individuals was /=96%, in skeletal muscle injury, chronic renal disease, and same-day noncardiac surgery patients.     

Calculation of serum digoxin levels in patients with normal and impaired renal function

Serum digoxin levels were examined in 55 patients with varying degrees of renal function impairment who were receiving chronic oral digoxin therapy. Three methods of predicting digoxin serum levels were investigated. Each method may be applied using serum creatinine values and does not require urinary data. Correlations between calculated and actual digoxin levels in combined male and female patients were improved when changes in digoxin distribution volumes in renal impairment were considered. Correlations between calculated and actual digoxin levels were poor in male patients but were again improved by incorporating changes in drug distribution volume. Correlations obtained in female patients were superior to those obtained in male patients and appeared to be independent of the method of calculation employed.     

Impairment of digoxin clearance by coadministration of quinidine

Seven healthy volunteers received a single 1.0-mg dose of intravenous digoxin in a drug-free control trial and again during concurrent therapy with therapeutic doses of quinidine. Digoxin kinetics were determined from multiple serum digoxin concentrations measured during 72 hours after dosage. Compared to the control state, quinidine coadministration reduced mean digoxin volume of distribution (15.1 vs. 12.4 l./kg), prolonged its elimination half-life (47.7 vs. 75.7 hours), and significantly reduced total clearance (6.06 vs. 2.18 ml/min.kg). Both renal and extrarenal digoxin clearances were impaired by quinidine. In nine cardiac patients receiving long-term digoxin therapy (0.25 mg twice daily), quinidine coadministration elevated mean morning digoxin levels from 1.37 to 2.0 ng/ml (P less than 0.001) and evening levels from 1.44 to 1.97 ng/ml (N.S.). If digoxin concentrations at the site of action are increased by quinidine, the interaction is likely to be of clinical importance in many patients.     

Biochemical evaluation of digoxin dosage in patients with heart failure

The investigations were carried out in 56 patients aged 54 to 84 years, treated with a supporting dosage 0.25 mg of digoxin because of chronical insufficiency of the heart, according to the NYHA classification II and III degree, in whom the functions of liver and kidneys have not been ascertained. A fourfold determination of digoxin concentrations in the blood was established in the time of distribution balance. From among the examined patients three groups were separated: receiving the drug chronically at 8.00 a.m. (group A), receiving it at 8.00 p.m. (group B) and group C, for which the sacral method was used. Depending on medical indications the patients received during the examination other drugs. In group C the therapy was limited to diuretic drugs. In no clinical symptoms of digitalism could be observed. Subtherapeutic levels of digoxin (< 0.8 ng/ml) were found in the three groups on an average in 50% of the patients. The high percentage of patients with nontherapeutic concentration in blood serum confirms once more, that treatment with digoxin without checking their concentration in the serum does not give the certainty of suitable dosage. The results of the studies show that the optimalization of digoxin therapy from the point of pharmacological view should be based on a penetrating estimation of the whole of the clinical image, the checking of the image with the help of the concentration determinations of the drug.     

Therapeutic digoxin level in chylous drainage with no detectable plasma digoxin level

A patient receiving digoxin for long-standing congestive heart failure developed a chylothorax following removal of an infected aortic graft. Drainage of the chylothorax resulted in plasma digoxin concentrations which were near zero while the digoxin levels in the chylous drainage fluid were therapeutic. The sequestration of even low lipid-soluble drugs, such as digoxin, in chyle should be recognized to prevent subtherapeutic plasma levels in patients undergoing chylothorax drainage.     

Immunoassay of digoxin in hair

Digoxin analysis in blood is an essential tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in cardiology because compliance with the treatment is a critical issue for the patient. Unfortunately, in postmortem cases blood digoxin concentration is of poor quality because there is a possible drug redistribution in the corpse and because of digoxin-like factors present in some people's blood. On the other hand, no biological fluid can be obtained at the autopsy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of an immunological method to determine digoxin in hair, in order to confirm that hair analysis can provide information on digoxin use before death. We studied 35 elderly patients who had been taking digoxin (60-250 micrograms/day) for 1-5 years. Two decontamination procedures were tested: washing by dichloromethane or by water and methanol. Three extraction procedures were compared: crushing in a ball mill and chloroform/acetone: crushing and methanol; enzymatic digestion. Immunoassays were performed by a microparticulate enzyme immunoassay. Serum digoxin levels were also assayed when sampling hair. The best results were obtained after decontamination with water and methanol followed by enzymatic digestion. Hair digoxin concentrations range from 3.6 to 11.4 pg/mg. Those very low concentrations are probably due to low and narrow range serum digoxin levels (0.3-1.4 ng/ml). No correlation was found between hair and blood digoxin. A forensic case is presented with 5 pg/mg digoxin in hair.     

Determination of cardiac troponin I forms in the blood of patients with acute myocardial infarction and patients receiving crystalloid or cold blood cardioplegia

To determine the forms of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) circulating in the bloodstream of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and patients receiving a cardioplegia during heart surgery, we developed three immunoenzymatic sandwich assays. The first assay involves the combination of two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for human cTnI. The second assay involves the combination of a mAb specific for troponin C (TnC) and an anti-cTnI mAb. The third assay was a combination of a mAb specific for human cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and an anti-cTnI mAb. Fifteen serum samples from patients with AMI, 10 serum samples from patients receiving crystalloid cardioplegia during heart surgery, and 10 serum samples from patients receiving cold blood cardioplegia during heart surgery were assayed by the three two-site immunoassays. We confirmed that cTnI circulates not only in free form but also complexed with the other troponin components (TnC and cTnT). We showed that the predominant form in blood is the cTnI-TnC binary complex (IC). Free cTnI, the cTnI-cTnT binary complex, and the cTnT-cTnI-TnC ternary complex were seldom present, and when present, were in small quantities compared with the binary complex IC. Similar results were obtained in both patient populations studied. These observations are essential for the development of new immunoassays with improved clinical sensitivity and for the selection of an appropriate cTnI primary calibrator.     

Effect of digoxin on the sensitivity to flickering light

1 The sensitivity to flickering light at various light frequencies (DeLange curve) was determined in 20 controls and 45 patients receiving maintenance doses of digoxin. 2 Flicker thresholds (mean percentage of maximal light modulation +/- s.d.; F 30 Hz) were 7.6 +/- 1.7 in controls and 9.4 +/- 1.7 in patients with optimal plasma digoxin levels (0.5-1.9 ng/ml), but they rose to 15.5 +/- 1.9 at subtoxic levels (2.0-3.0 ng/ml), and to 21.8 +/- 2.6 at toxic levels (above 3.0 ng/ml). 3 Flicker sensitivity was inversely correlated with plasma digoxin levels and returned to baseline values when the administration of digoxin was interrupted. 4 The DeLange curve seems to be a valuable tool to measure the toxic effects of digitalis on the visual system.     

Cross-reactivity of TDX and OPUS immunoassay systems for serum digoxin determination

The properties of the widely used TDX Analyzer and recently developed OPUS Immunoassay System were compared using 403 serum specimens taken from patients who did or did not take digoxin. Of the 210 specimens from patients not treated with digoxin, a false- positive digoxin concentration was detected in 15 specimens (7%) by TDX and in only 2 specimens (1%) by OPUS because of the cross-reactivity with structurally similar drugs. Potassium canrenoate, digitoxin, deslanoside, and methyldigoxin exhibited marked concentration-dependent cross-reactivity in the TDX assay method, whereas deslanoside and methyldigoxin only showed cross-reactivity with the antibody used in the OPUS method. Although a poor correlation was observed between these two methods for the determination of 193 samples from patients treated with digoxin, the correlation was remarkably improved (r = 0.914) and the slope approximated unity when excluded the data from patients who were treated concurrently with the cross-reactive compounds. In routine TDM of digoxin, the authors experienced two cases in which cross-reactivity of the assay system caused a clinical problem. Concurrent administration of intravenous canrenoate apparently interfered with the digoxin assay by TDX, but this problem was solved by using the OPUS system. The authors found OPUS more useful for monitoring serum digoxin concentrations in patients because of its superior specificity.     

Pharmacokinetic aspects of digoxin in patients with terminal renal failure. II. On hemodialysis

Pharmacokinetics of digoxin was studied in 9 patients during hemodialysis. All patients were treated with a short-dialysis schedule, using Gambro Lundia Major dialysers for 5 patients and Gambro Lundia Nova dialysers for 4 patients. Clearances of the dialysers and half-lives were calculated from plasma digoxin levels in blood samples taken simultaneously from arterial and venous blood lines during hemodialysis. The mean clearances of the Major and Nova were 28.3 and 21.8 ml/min respectively. During hemodialysis the mean plasma half-life was 13.8 hours with the Major and 19.1 hours with the Nova. The mean net lowering effect of hemodialysis on the plasma concentration decay line was 9.5 and 6.5% for the Major and Nova respectively. Post-dialysis plasma concentration data suggest that the rate at which digoxin returns to plasma from body tissues is the rate-controlling factor in the elimination of digoxin by the artificial kidney.     

Neutralization of cardiac toxins oleandrin, oleandrigenin, bufalin, and cinobufotalin by digibind: monitoring the effect by measuring free digitoxin concentrations

Oleandrin plant poisoning is common in children and the plant extract is used in Chinese medicines. The toxicity is due to oleandrin and the deglycosylated metabolite oleandrigenin. Bufalin and cinobufotalin (toad cardiac toxins) are also widely used in Chinese medicines like Chan SU, and Lu-Shen -WU. Severe toxicity from bufalin after consumption of toad soup has been reported. Taking advantage of structural similarities of these toxins with digitoxin, we demonstrated that these compounds can be rapidly detected in blood by the fluorescence polarization immunoassay for digitoxin. The cross reactivities of these compounds with digoxin assay were much lower. For example, when a drug free serum was supplemented with 10 microg/ml of oleandrin, we observed 127.7 ng/ml of digitoxin equivalent but only 2.4 ng/ml of digoxin equivalent concentration. Digibind neutralized all cardiac toxins studied as evidenced by significant fall of free concentrations. When aliquots of serum pool containing 50.0 microg/ml of oleandrin were supplemented with 0, 10.0, 25.0, 50.0, 100, and 200 microg/ml of digibind, the mean free concentrations were 30.6, 23.3, 16.0, 10.7, 7.8 and 5.5 microg/ml respectively. Similarly, with 50.0 microg/ml of oleandrigenin (total concentration: 36.2 ng/ml), the free concentration was 14.5 ng/ml digitoxin equivalent in the absence of digibind and 5.4 ng/ml in the presence of 200 microg/ml of digibind. In another specimen containing 500 ng/ml bufalin (total concentration: 156.9 ng/ml), the free concentration was 8.6 ng/ml in the absence of digibind and none detected in the presence of 100.0 microg/ml digibind. Because such neutralization may also occur in vivo, digibind may be useful in treating patients exposed to these toxins.     

Effect of furosemide on the renal excretion of digoxin

Digoxin serum and urine levels were determined by radioimmunoassay in 6 subjects (4 patients with heart disease and 2 volunteers without heart disease) who had been maintained on oral digoxin (0.25 or 0.5 mg daily). Observations were made during a 3-day control period and then during 8 days of concomitant digoxin and oral furosemide (40 mg daily) therapy. Serum digoxin levels determined 10 and 24 hr after each dose of digoxin averaged 1.2+/-0.1 ng/ml (M+/-SE) during control and 1.3+/-0.1 during the last 3 days on digoxin and furosemide. The daily urinary excretion of digoxine averaged 51+/-6% of the oral dose during control and 52+/-6 during the entire period of furosemide administration. The renal clearance of digoxin and creatinine averaged 94+/-7 and 87+/-11 ml/min, respectively, during control; corresponding values were 88+/-8 and 85+/-9 for urine collections demonstrating a distinct diuretic effect of furosemide and 87+/-8 and 75+/-10 for urine collections not demonstrating such an effect during diuretic therapy. The results suggest that the diuretic effect of furosemide does not significantly affect the excretion of digoxin     

The short-term effects of digoxin in patients with right ventricular dysfunction from pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVE: Studies on the effects of digoxin in patients with right ventricular failure and normal left ventricular function have not been performed. We evaluated the short-term effects of digoxin administration in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension on hemodynamics, neurohormones, and baroreceptor responsiveness. DESIGN: This was a prospective study with patients serving as their own controls. SETTING: University Hospital Intensive Care Unit with central monitoring. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients with primary pulmonary hypertension and symptomatic heart failure were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Following baseline hemodynamics, neurohormonal samples were drawn and the heart rate response to change in blood pressure following a challenge of phenylephrine and nitroprusside were recorded. One mg of intravenous digoxin was given and the measurements repeated after 2 hours. RESULTS: Following digoxin there was a significant increase in cardiac output (3.49+/-1.2 to 3.81+/-1.2 L/min., p=0.028), a significant fall in norepinephrine (680+/-89 to 580+/-85 pg/ml, p=.013), and a significant increase in atrial natriuretic peptide (311+/-44 to 421+/-9 pg/ml, p=0.01). All of the patients had changes in heart rate and blood pressure following phenylephrine and nitroprusside challenge, but there was no significant difference in the change in heart rate response to change in blood pressure when rechallenged after digoxin treatment. CONCLUSION: Digoxin produces a modest increase in cardiac output in patients with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure, as well as a significant reduction in circulating norepinephrine. No detectable effects of digoxin on baroreceptor responsiveness were apparent. The use of digoxin in pulmonary hypertension is warranted.     

Effect of intravenous furosemide on the renal excretion of digoxin

The effect of an 80-mg intravenous dose of furosemide on the urinary excretion of digoxin was determined in three adult men with normal renal function, each of whom was taking 0.25 mg digoxin daily on a chronic basis. On two separate days, serum samples were taken and urine was collected every 2 hours over an 8-hour period for determination of digoxin, creatinine, calcium, and sodium concentrations. On the first day of study, a saline bolus was given intravenously, and on the second day, furosemide was given. In all subjects, urinary digoxin excretion increased after furosemide in direct proportion to the increase in urine volume. No consistent correlation was seen between digoxin excretion and creatinine, calcium, or sodium output. No significant changes in serum digoxin were found in this active study. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that increasing glomerular filtration rate or total urine volume increases the renal excretion of digoxin and may result in increased total urinary output of this glycoside.     

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for digoxin disposition in dogs and its preliminary application to humans

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for digoxin disposition developed in the rat was modified to account for the interspecies differences in tissue-to-plasma digoxin concentration ratios and applied to the dog. The model provided a quantitative assessment of the time course of digoxin concentrations in dog plasma, various tissues, and urine. It also predicted the effect of renal failure on digoxin pharmacokinetics in the dog. An attempt to scale the dog model to humans by simply considering differences in organ volumes, organ flow rates, and digoxin clearances was partially successful. Good predictions of plasma digoxin concentration and urinary digoxin excretion after a single dose and of steady-state plasma, heart, and skeletal muscle digoxin concentrations were obtained. However, the model predicted considerably higher kidney digoxin concentrations than are actually found. Although the model adequately characterized the time course of digoxin concentrations in patients with moderate renal impairment, it provided a relatively poor fit to that observed in anuric patients.     

Value of digoxin in heart failure and sinus rhythm: new features of an old drug?

Digoxin has been a controversial drug since its introduction >200 years ago. Although its efficacy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation is clear, its value in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm has often been questioned. In the 1980s, reports of some large-scale trials indicated that digoxin, with or without vasodilators or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, reduced signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure and improved exercise tolerance. This beneficial influence was mainly found in patients with more advanced heart failure and dilated ventricles, whereas the effect in those with mild disease appeared to be less pronounced. In the last few years, new data have shown that digoxin may also have clinical value in mild heart failure, either when used in combination with other drugs or when administered alone. As neurohumoral activation has increasingly been recognized to be a contributing factor in the disease progression of chronic heart failure, the modulating effects of digoxin on neurohumoral and autonomic status have received more attention. Also, there is evidence that relatively low doses of digoxin may be at least as effective as higher doses and have a lower incidence of side effects. Further, the recognition that the use of digoxin too early after myocardial infarction may be harmful and the development of other drugs, in particular angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, have obviously changed the place of digoxin in the treatment of chronic heart failure. The large-scale survival trial by the Digitalis Investigators Group (DIG), whose preliminary results have recently been presented, has shown that although digoxin has a neutral effect on total mortality during long-term treatment, it reduces the number of hospital admissions and deaths due to worsening heart failure. The potentially new features of the old drug digoxin are discussed in this review.     

Mid- and long-term similarity of ventricular response to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: digoxin versus placebo

The effects of digoxin on ventricular response during atrial fibrillation (AF) and consequent effects on arrhythmic symptoms have still not been fully explained. This study investigated whether the treatment by digoxin contributes to mid- and long-term stabilization of ventricular cycles in patients with paroxysmal AF. A population of 45 patients with paroxysmal AF underwent 24-hour ECG recordings during each arm of a randomized crossover trial comparing digoxin and placebo. This yielded 30 Holter recordings from 22 patients that contained AF episodes lasting in excess of 2 minutes and with acceptably low Holter noise. Each AF episode was divided into nonoverlapping segments of 30 seconds and the distribution of RR intervals in each segment was compared with the distribution of all other AF segments in the same recording using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The percentage of tests that revealed significant differences at levels of P < or = 0.01, and P < or = 0.001 were sorted according to the time between the segments compared. The comparisons of these results were performed between: (a) all recordings on placebo (n = 16) and all recordings on digoxin (n = 14), and (b) between recordings on placebo and on digoxin in 8 patients in whom paired analysis was possible. Adjacent AF segments (distance 0) differed significantly only in < 30% of both recordings on placebo and on digoxin. However, with increasing the distance between segments, the proportion of the significant differences between RR interval distributions increased more with placebo than with digoxin (P < 10(-300), Chi-square test). Paired data revealed larger differences between placebo and digoxin with increasing distance between segments. Thus in patients with paroxysmal AF, digoxin leads to more reproducible patterns of ventricular cycles that may be better tolerated clinically.     

Serum digoxin concentration: dependence on body weight and age

In patients of a cardiological practice, 121 digoxin serum concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Some drugs were suspected of interfering with the RIA or with the pharmacokinetics of digoxin. Patients having such additional drugs or patients with elevated serum creatinine were not included. The daily maintenance dose of digoxin was roughly adjusted to body weight. Patients with 0.5 mg digoxin daily showed unexpectedly low serum digoxin levels not fully explained by the relatively high body weight. This dose group was not included in the following correlations. At a maintenance dose of 0.25 and 0.375 mg digoxin and in the age groups 40-69 years (n = 66) there was an approximately inverse proportionality between serum digoxin concentration (per 0.25 mg digoxin daily) and body weight. When all age classes from 20 to 89 years were included (n = 96), a week positive correlation between serum digoxin concentration (per 0.25 mg digoxin daily and per 69.28 kg body weight) and age was found. A similar positive correlation resulted between serum digoxin concentration (per 0.25 mg digoxin daily) and the reciprocal of the nomographically determined creatinine clearance, always within the normal serum creatinine range. Based on these correlations, two simplified formulas are presented to predict the serum concentration and therapeutic maintenance dose of digoxin. The formulas are valid for the normal serum creatinine range and for digoxin tablets of optimal bioavailability.     

Effects of terbinafine on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteers

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential effects of terbinafine, a new synthetic allylamine antifungal agent, on the pharmacokinetics of a single 0.75-mg oral dose of digoxin. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study consisting of two treatment periods. SUBJECTS: Sixteen healthy men and women volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: During treatment A, placebo was administered once/day for 12 days; during treatment B, terbinafine 250 mg was administered orally once/day for 12 days. The washout period between treatments was at least 2 weeks. A single 0.75-mg oral dose of digoxin was administered on day 8 of each period. Blood samples were collected after administration of digoxin to determine pharmacokinetics. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with placebo, terbinafine did not alter the time course of the digoxin serum levels. Although the time to maximum peak concentration with terbinafine was slightly reduced, the maximum concentration and area under the serum drug concentration-time curve from time zero to 120 hours were not significantly different with terbinafine than with placebo. No drug-related side effects were reported with either active treatment, and no clinically significant changes in vital signs, physical examination results, electrocardiograms, or clinical laboratory results were observed. CONCLUSIONS: No special dosage adjustments for digoxin appear to be necessary during concomitant therapy with terbinafine.