American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference definitions of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and allied disorders in relation to critically injured patients

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of the proposed definitions for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and septic shock, and to further define severe SIRS and sterile shock as determined at 24 hrs of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) in critically ill trauma patients without head injury, and their relationships to mechanism of injury, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, risk of death, Injury Severity Score (ISS), number of organ failures, and mortality rate. DESIGN: Prospective, inception cohort analysis. SETTING: Sixteen-bed surgical ICU in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Four hundred fifty critically injured patients without associated head trauma. Penetrating trauma accounted for 70% (gunshot 202; stab 113) and nonpenetrating trauma for 30% (motor vehicle collision 103; blunt 32) of admissions. Three hundred ninety-four (88%) patients underwent surgical procedures. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Infective and noninfective insults were distinguished by the need for therapeutic or prophylactic antibiotics, respectively, based on an established antibiotic policy. Three hundred ninety-five (87.8%) patients fulfilled a definition of the SIRS criteria. The frequency of the definitive categories was SIRS 21.8%, sepsis 14.4%, severe SIRS 8.4%, severe sepsis 13.6%, sterile shock 9.3%, and septic shock 20.2%. Patients with penetrating trauma had a significantly higher frequency of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock (p < .01). The APACHE II score, risk of death, and number of organ failures increased significantly in both infective and noninfective groups with increasing severity of the inflammatory response. Sterile shock was associated with a significantly higher APACHE II score (p < .02), risk of death (p < .01), and number of organ failures (p = .03) compared with septic shock. Only sterile shock was associated with a significantly higher ISS (p < .01). Organ system failure was significantly (p < .001) higher in nonsurvivors compared with survivors in all categories. The only significant (p < .001) difference in mortality rate was found between patients in shock and all other categories. CONCLUSIONS: The current definitions of SIRS, sepsis, and related disorders in critically injured patients without head trauma show a significant association with physiologic deterioration and increasing organ dysfunction. The only significant association with mortality, however, is the presence of shock. The definitions require refinement, with the possible inclusion of more objective gradations of organ system failure, if they are to be used for stratifying severity of illness in seriously injured patients.     

Epidemiology of sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the cumulated incidence and the density of incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in critically ill children; to distinguish patients with primary from those with secondary MODS. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Pediatric ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: One thousand fifty-eight consecutive hospital admissions. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: SIRS occurred in 82% (n=869) of hospital admissions, 23% (n=245) had sepsis, 4% (n=46) had severe sepsis, 2% (n=25) had septic shock; 16% (n=168) had primary MODS and 2% (n=23) had secondary MODS; 6% (n=68) of the study population died. The pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) scores on the first day of admission to pediatric ICU were as follows: 3.9 +/- 3.6 (no SIRS), 7.0 +/- 7.0 (SIRS), 9.5 +/- 8.3 (sepsis), 8.8 +/- 7.8 (severe sepsis), 21.8 +/- 15.8 (septic shock); differences among groups (p=0.0001), all orthogonal comparisons, were significant (p<0.05), except for patients with severe sepsis. The observed mortality for the whole study population was also different according to the underlying diagnostic category (p=0.0001; p<0.05 for patients with SIRS and those with septic shock, compared with all groups). Among, patients with MODS, the difference in mortality between groups did not reach significance (p=0.057). Children with secondary MODS had a longer duration of organ dysfunction (p<0.0001), a longer stay in pediatric ICU after MODS diagnosis (p<0.0001), and a higher risk of mortality (odds ratio, 6.5 [2.7 to 15.9], p<0.0001) than patients with primary MODS. CONCLUSIONS: SIRS and sepsis occur frequently in critically ill children. The presence of SIRS, sepsis, or septic shock is associated with a distinct risk of mortality among critically ill children admitted to the pediatric ICU; more data are needed concerning children with MODS. Secondary MODS is much less common than primary MODS, but it is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality; we speculate that distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms are involved in these two conditions.     

Septicemia and systemic inflammatory response

To determine the relation between endocarditis/septicemia and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), septic shock, MODS, we performed a retrospective analysis in 196 HIV-negative patients, with endocarditis/septicemia. No deaths were observed between 20 patients with endocarditis without severe infective SIRS/septic shock. On the other hand among 10 patients with endocarditis with severe infective SIRS/septic shock we registered 3 deaths (P = 0.052). No deaths were registered among 93 patients with septicemia without severe infective SIRS/septic shock. Between 73 patients with septicemia and severe infective SIRS/septic shock 9 (12.3%) patients died and, precisely, 7/61 in severe infective SIRS (11.4%) and 2/.12 (16.6%) in septic shock (P = 0.003). The definition of septicemia according to Schottmüller (1914), as a generalized bacterial infection with a persistent bacteremia is still justified. The term "sepsis" has become ambiguous because it has been used as synonym of "acute response to infection", while in the past and presently, at least in Europe, it is synonym of septicemia, persistent bacteremia. The term of SIRS could avoid the misunderstanding. The words: "infective SIRS", "severe infective SIRS", may label properly the reactive events mounted by the host as a useful defence against infections but they become dangerous and bring about septic shock, organ failure and mortality when excessive.     

Intestinal permeability correlates with severity of injury in trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Increased intestinal permeability (IP) and the release of toxic intraluminal materials have been implicated in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiple organ failure (MOF) observed in patients after severe trauma. Previous studies of intestinal permeability have failed to demonstrate a correlation between early measurements of IP and indicators of injury severity. This study examines the relationship between standard measures of injury severity and the early (day 1) and delayed (day 4) changes in IP. Associations between IP and the development of SIRS, MOF, and infectious complications were also studied. METHODS: The metabolically inactive markers lactulose (L) and mannitol (M) were used to measure IP in 29 consecutive patients who sustained injuries that required admission to the surgical intensive care unit and in 10 healthy control subjects. Measurements were made within 24 hours of admission and on hospital day 4. Severity of injury was assessed by A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. Postinjury infections and parameters of SIRS and MOF were recorded. RESULTS: The IP of healthy volunteers (L/M, 0.025 +/- 0.008) was within the normal range (L/M < or = 0.03), whereas the average IP in injured patients was increased both within 24 hours (L/M, 0.139 +/- 0.172) and on the fourth hospital day (L/M, 0.346 +/- 0.699). No significant correlation between severity of injury and increased IP was seen within 24 hours of injury. A significant correlation was seen on hospital day 4, however, with all severity indices measured (ASCOT: r = 0.93, R2 = 0.87, p < 0.001; TRISS: r = 0.93, R2 = 0.87, p < 0.001; ISS: r = 0.84, R2 = 0.70, p < 0.001; RTS: r = 0.68, R2 = 0.47, p = 0.002; APACHE II score: r = 0.51, R2 = 0.26, p = 0.04). Patients with markedly increased IP (L/M > or = 0.100) experienced a significant increase in the development of SIRS (83 vs. 44%; p = 0.03) and subsequent infectious complications (58 vs. 13%; p = 0.01) and showed close correlation with the multiple organ dysfunction scores (r = 0.87, R2 = 0.76, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These observations demonstrate that the increased IP observed after trauma correlates with severity of injury only after 72 to 96 hours and not within the initial 24 hours of injury. A large increase in IP is associated with the development of SIRS, multiple organ dysfunction, and an increased incidence of infectious complications.     

The presence of wild-type TP53 is necessary for the radioprotective effect of the Bowman-Birk proteinase inhibitor in normal fibroblasts

This paper uses definitions of a consensus conference (ACCP/CCM) describing the epidemiology of SIRS, sepsis and septic shock in surgical ICU patients. During a period of 2 years a total of 656 patients were prospectively enrolled into the study. 335 patients (51.1% of the total population) developed SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome); in 65 of these patients infection could be documented, i.e. they met the criteria of sepsis, 47 of these 65 septic patients developed septic shock, with mortality of 53.2%. SIRS is associated with a high sensitivity but a low specificity in predicting the outcome of ICU patients. Moreover, SIRS and sepsis appear to be of minor clinical relevance. On the contrary, septic shock describes a very high risk group of patients which should be characterized more closely in future studies.     

Effects of an immune-enhancing diet in critically injured patients

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of an immune-enhancing experimental diet (XD = supplemental arginine, trace elements, and increased omega-3 fatty acids) versus standard diet (SD), on immune cell function and clinical outcome of critically injured patients. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial of patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit after trauma (Injury Severity Score > 13). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received early enteral nutrition with either XD or SD for a minimum of 5 days. MEASUREMENTS: Mortality, intensive care unit, ventilator, and hospital days, as well as incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and infectious complications were recorded. Nutritional parameters were also studied. Peripheral blood leukocytes were isolated from normal volunteers and from patients on days 1, 6, and 10 of feeding. MAIN RESULTS: Demographics and injury severity were similar in both groups. Both SD (n = 21) and XD (n = 22) groups revealed depressed monocyte function (tumor necrosis factor, prostaglandin E2, and procoagulant activity) on day 1 compared with a reference group (p < 0.05). However, monocytes from XD patients began to "normalize" their response (tumor necrosis factor, prostaglandin E2, and procoagulant activity) by day 6. Although ARDS occurred more frequently in the XD group (45 vs. 19%), the majority of ARDS in both groups occurred very early, with only three patients in the XD (13.6%) and one patient in the SD (4.7%) groups developing ARDS after study entry. XD patients remained on the ventilator longer (16.4 vs. 9.7 days) and in the hospital longer (32.9 vs. 22 days) compared with the SD group, but overall mortality was nearly identical (4.5 vs. 5%). CONCLUSION: The exact role and timing for diets with immune-enhancing effects has yet to be defined.     

Intramedullary femoral osteosynthesis: an additional cause of ARDS in multiply injured patients?

This study analysed the effects of reaming and intramedullary nailing and thoracic injury related to development of ARDS and multi-organ failure in multiply injured patients. Sixty patients were entered into a retrospective follow-up study. Twenty-one patients with thoracic injury and femoral shaft fracture, treated by intramedullary nailing, were compared with 17 patients with a femoral shaft fracture without thoracic injury, and with 22 patients without femoral shaft fracture but with major thoracic injury. The incidence of ARDS, multiple organ failure (MOF) and the mortality rate in the groups was analysed, using chi 2 and Fisher exact tests. No significant differences in age, sex and ISS existed between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to the incidence of developing ARDS (P > 0.5), MOF (P > 0.5) and mortality rate (P > 0.2) after injury. The results of this study suggest that reaming of the femoral shaft as part of an intramedullary nailing procedure is not a major cause in developing ARDS and MOF in patients with femoral shaft fractures and thoracic injury. Conventional intramedullary nailing can be considered as a safe procedure in femoral shaft fractures in multiply injured patients, as well as in the presence of major thoracic injury.     

A randomized trial of isonitrogenous enteral diets after severe trauma. An immune-enhancing diet reduces septic complications

OBJECTIVE: The authors randomized patients to an enteral diet containing glutamine, arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and nucleotides or to an isonitrogenous, isocaloric diet to investigate the effect of septic outcome. A third group of patients, without enteral access but eligible by severity of injury, served as unfed controls and were studied prospectively to determine the risk of infection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laboratory and clinical studies suggest that diets containing specialty nutrients, such as arginine, glutamine, nucleotides, and omega-3 fatty acids, reduce septic complications. Unfortunately, most clinical trials have not compared these diets versus isonitrogenous, isocaloric controls. This prospective, blinded study randomized 35 severely injured patients with an Abdominal Trauma Index > or = 25 or a Injury Severity Score > or = 21 who had early enteral access to an immune-enhancing diet ([IED] Immun-Aid, McGaw, Inc., Irvine, CA; n = 17) or an isonitrogenous, isocaloric diet (Promote [Ross Laboratories, Columbus, OH] and Casec [Mead-Johnson Nutritionals, Evansville, IN]; n = 18) diet. Patients without early enteral access but eligible by severity of injury served as contemporaneous controls (n = 19). Patients were evaluated for septic complications, antibiotic usage, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital costs. RESULTS: Two patients died in the treatment group and were dropped from the study. Significantly fewer major infectious complications (6%) developed in patients randomized to the IED than patients in the isonitrogenous group (41%, p = 0.02) or the control group (58%, p = 0.002). Hospital stay, therapeutic antibiotics, and the development of intra-abdominal abscess was significantly lower in patients receiving the IED than the other two groups. This improved clinical outcome was reflected in reduced hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: An IED significantly reduces major infectious complications in severely injured patients compared with those receiving isonitrogenous diet or no early enteral nutrition. An IED is the preferred diet for early enteral feeding after severe blunt and penetrating trauma in patients at risk of subsequent septic complications. Unfed patients have the highest complication rate.     

Differences in mortality between elderly and younger adult trauma patients: geriatric status increases risk of delayed death

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients suffer higher mortality rates after trauma than younger patients. This increased mortality is attributable to age, preexisting disease, and complications as well as injury severity. METHODS: Records from 5,139 adult patients from a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), early mortality (<24 hours), and late mortality (>24 hours) were determined for elderly (> or =65 years) and younger (16-64 years) patients. Preexisting diseases and complications were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis coding. RESULTS: Mortality in elderly patients was twice that in younger patients despite equivalent injury severity (p < 0.001), and elderly patients were more likely to suffer later death than younger patients (p < 0.005). The prevalence of preexisting disease was greater in the elderly, as was the incidence of complications. Using logistic regression, ISS, RTS, preexisting cardiovascular or liver disease, the development of cardiac, renal, or infectious complications, and geriatric status were all independently predictive of late mortality (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Elderly trauma patients more frequently suffer late mortality than younger patients because of the combination of injury and increased preexisting disease and complications after injury. Aggressive treatment of the elderly trauma patient is warranted; however, in the face of significant preexisting disease or complications, survival is less likely. Predictive models of survival can be developed, taking into account preexisting disease and complications as well as admission parameters such as age, ISS, and RTS, and specific risk of mortality quantitated.     

Effect of surgical panel composition on patient outcome at a level I trauma center

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of staffing with general surgeons vs trauma specialists on patient outcome at a trauma center. DESIGN: The care of injured patients at a level I urban trauma center serving a population of 2.5 million was the responsibility of 12 surgeons (10 general surgeons and 2 trauma specialists) between January 1 and June 30, 1996 (group 1). Between July 1 and December 31, 1996 (group 2), trauma was the responsibility solely of 4 trauma specialists. An additional comparison was made with those patients in group 1 who were admitted to the general surgeons (group 1A). The outcomes and quality of care for these periods, as determined by the quality assurance screens, were retrospectively analyzed and compared. SETTING: Urban, tertiary care, level I trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Each trauma and burn patient admitted during the study periods is included in this study. Upon the patient's discharge from the hospital, specially trained nurses completed a review of the patient's stay and entered it into the TraumaOne database (Lancet Technology Inc, Cambridge, Mass). There were 693 trauma patients in group 1 (472 in group 1A) and 734 patients in group 2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, length of stay, and 16 quality assurance screens were quantified and compared using chi(2) analyses and t tests. RESULTS: The age and sex of the 2 groups were similar. The mortality rate was 6.2% (43/693) in group 1, 6.1% (29/472) in group 1A, and 6.5% (48/734) in group 2 (P = .80 and P = .78, respectively). When stratified by injury severity score (ISS), lengths of stay were statistically similar, except for patients with an ISS of 0 to 7. Patients with an ISS of 0 to 7 in groups 1 and 1A stayed a mean of 2.6 days, compared with 3.2 days for group 2 (P = .01 and P = .02, respectively). The results of quality assurance screens (missed injury, wound infection, readmission, and 13 others) were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transitions in staffing afforded the opportunity to examine patient outcomes by surgeon specialization and frequency of call. In our sample, 12 well-trained surgeons taking call less frequently managed a trauma service as efficiently as a group of 4 trauma specialists, without any differences in morbidity and mortality.     

Avoiding false positives in colony PCR

BACKGROUND: The Injury Severity Score (ISS) does not take into account multiple injuries in the same body region, whereas a New ISS (NISS) may provide a more accurate measure of trauma severity by considering the patient's three greatest injuries regardless of body region. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ISS and NISS in patients with blunt trauma. METHODS: Consecutive individuals treated from January of 1992 to September of 1996 at one institution were included if they had sustained blunt trauma and satisfied triage standards (n = 2,328). For each patient, we computed the ISS and the NISS to determine how often the two scores were identical or discrepant. Discrepant cases were then further analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves to determine which score better predicted short-term mortality. RESULTS: The mean ISS was 25 +/- 13, and the mean NISS was 33 +/- 18. The two predictive scores were identical in 32% of patients and discrepant in 68% of patients. Patients with identical scores had a lower mortality rate than patients with discrepant scores (10% vs. 13%; p < 0.02). In patients with discrepant scores, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was greater for the NISS than the ISS (0.852 vs. 0.799; p < 0.001), and greater amounts of discrepancy were associated with increasing rates of mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The NISS often increases the apparent severity of injury and provides a more accurate prediction of short-term mortality. The benefit associated with using the NISS rather than the ISS must be weighed against the disadvantages of changing a scoring system and the potential for still greater improvements.     

The effects of long-term prone positioning in patients with trauma-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome

Prone positioning improves gas exchange in some patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the effects of repeated, long-term prone positioning (20 h duration) have never been evaluated systemically. We therefore investigated 20 patients with ARDS after multiple trauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] 27.3 +/- 10, ARDS score 2.84 +/- 0.42). Patients who fulfilled the entry criteria (bilateral diffuse infiltrates, severe hypoxemia, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure [PAOP] < 18 mm Hg, and PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] < 200 mm Hg at inverse ratio ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] > 8 mm Hg for more than 24 h) were turned to the prone position at noon and were turned back to the supine position at 8:00 AM on the next day. Thus only two turns per day were necessary, and the risk of disconnecting airways or medical lines was minimized. Prone positioning was repeated for another 20 h if the patients fulfilled the entry criteria. Except for FIO2, the ventilator settings remained unchanged during the study period. All patients were sedated and, if needed paralyzed to minimize patient discomfort. One hour before and after each position change, ventilator settings and pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics were recorded and blood was obtained for blood gas analysis. Derived cardiopulmonary and ventilatory variables were calculated using standard formulas. Overall mortality was 10%. Oxygenation variables improved significantly each time the patients were placed prone. Immediately after the first turn from the supine to the prone position the following changes were observed: PaO2 increased from 97 +/- 4 to 152 +/- 15 mm Hg, intrapulmonary shunt (Qva/Qt) decreased from 30.3 +/- 2.3 to 25.5 +/- 1.8, and the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference decreased from 424 +/- 24 to 339 +/- 25 mm Hg. All these changes were statistically significant. Most of these improvements were lost when the patients were turned supine, but could be reproduced when prone positioning was repeated after a short period (4 h) in the supine position. Short periods in the supine position were necessary to allow for nursing care, medical evaluation, and interventions such as placement of central lines. No position-dependent changes of systemic hemodynamic variables were observed. We conclude that, in trauma patients with ARDS undergoing long-term positioning treatment, lung function improves significantly during prone position compared to short phases of conventional supine position during which the beneficial effects are partly lost.     

Six-year experience with Swan neck presternal peritoneal dialysis catheter

Airway control is the initial priority in the management of the injured patient. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the experience of an aeromedical transport team in the utilization of rapid sequence induction (RSI) for endotracheal intubation in the prehospital setting. Records of a consecutive series of injured patients undergoing RSI between June 1988 and July 1992 by a university-based aeromedical transport team were reviewed for demographics, intubation mishaps, and pulmonary complications. The relationship between intubation mishaps and pulmonary complications was analyzed. Eighty-four patients were studied with a mean age of 30.8 +/- 15.3 years. The mean Revised Trauma Score was 11.3 +/- 2.4, and the mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 19.6 +/- 11.5. Intubation mishaps occurred in 15 patients (18%), and pulmonary complications developed in 22 (29%) of the 75 patients surviving longer than 24 hours. There was no relationship between intubation mishaps and pulmonary complications. Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) face score was significantly higher in patients with intubation mishaps, compared with patients without mishaps (1.1 +/- 1.2 and 0.5 +/- 0.9, respectively, P < .05, Wilcoxon rank-sum). ISS and AIS chest were higher in patients with pulmonary complications, compared with those without (25.7 +/- 12.6 and 17.4 +/- 10.3 and 2.2 +/- 1.8 and 1.0 +/- 1.5, ISS and AIS respectively; P < .05, Wilcoxon rank-sum). Eighty-one patients (96%) underwent successful RSI, 73 (87%) on the first attempt. Failure to intubate occurred in three patients (4%). Performed under strict protocol by appropriately trained aeromedical transport personnel, RSI is an effective means to facilitate endotracheal intubation in the injured patient requiring definitive airway control. Pulmonary complications were related to injury severity and not to intubation mishaps.     

Effects of intravenous immunoglobulins in thrombopenia related to septic shock

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous immunoglobulins have been shown to be effective in the treatment of immunologically mediated thrombocytopenia. Several articles have been published on the positive effect of immunoglobulins in sepsis-related death. We retrospectively studied the effects of intravenous immunoglobulins used during septic shock thrombocytopenia over a 5-year period in a polyvalent intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were development of acute thrombocytopenia under 75 G/l during septic shock, excluding all cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thirty-five patients were included in the study; 18 were given polyvalent intravenous immunoglobulins (group IgIV) and 17 were not (controls). The two groups were comparable for SAPS and APACHE II gravity scores at admission and at day 0 (first day of septic shock with platelet count under 75 G/l), age, sex, platelet count at admission, OSF score, type of referral unit, McCabe score, and the presence of 4 parameters which might affect platelet count hemofiltration, ARDS, surgery, Swan-Ganz catheter. RESULTS: Platelet counts increased on day 8 in the treatment group (63.5 G/l, range 25-453 versus 105.7 G/l, range 38-355; p = 0.0505). The number of days with thrombocytopenia was the same in both groups. Overall mortality was high (60%) but there was a difference between the two groups in favor of the treated group (74.7% versus 44.4%; p = 0.053). The number of red cell units (214 vs. 164) and plasma units (175 vs. 54) transfused was higher in the control group. Platelet transfusion was equivalent in the two groups. DISCUSSION: Although we were unable to demonstrate a significant difference in the effects of immunoglobulins on platelet level and mortality, the trend during this evaluation was comparable with that reported in the literature. For transfusion, and although the results were not significant, a notion of reduced risk was evident. Prospective trials are needed to confirm these observations.     

Metastatic head and neck cancer: role and usefulness of FDG PET in locating occult primary tumors

OBJECTIVE: Secondary intracranial hypertension has been linked to leukocytosis. We examined our data bank containing physiologic recordings and outcome data of severely head injured patients to investigate the relationship between delayed increases in intracranial pressure (ICP), defined as occurring after a 12-hr period of normal ICP values, and leukocytosis. DESIGN: A retrospective study of observational data. SETTING: Regional neurosurgical unit and intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Sixty-four patients suffered increased ICP >20 mm Hg. Thirty-five patients fulfilled selection criteria for delayed increases in ICP (group 1). Twenty-nine patients with increased ICP with no preceding or intervening periods of normal ICP were selected as a comparison group (group 2). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Comparison of 12-month outcome revealed that 11% of group 1 patients died, with 49% remaining severely disabled, in contrast to group 2, where 35% of patients died and 14% were left severely disabled (p = .021). The pattern of outcome was independent of monitoring time, or injury severity. Regression modeling was performed for prediction of delayed increase in ICP. Of 46 patients with an initial increase then decrease in leukocyte count in the first 48 hrs, 65% experienced delayed increases in ICP, as compared with 18% of the 11 patients without this pattern p = .01 1). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with delayed increases have a significantly different pattern of outcome. Change in leukocyte count from admission to day 2 is a significant predictor of such a delayed increase.     

Necrosis of the femoral head after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Presentation of our experience in the treatment of war injuries to the thoracic esophagus at the Split University Hospital, Croatia, during the 1991-1995 wars in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and surgical data on patients with war injuries to the esophagus. RESULTS: Of 2494 treated injured persons, 5 patients (0.2%) had injuries to the esophagus. We performed temporary double-exclusion of the esophagus in all our patients, followed by gastric interposition after partial esophagegtomy in three patients and simple suturing with pericardial protection of the esophagus in one patient. One of our patients died after double-exclusion due to septic complications in spite of antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis regularly performed in all injured persons. Final surgical outcome and mortality rate (20%) in our patients were quite satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Prompt transportation, appropriate diagnostic methods and an adequate surgical treatment can markedly reduce mortality and complications rate in war injuries to the thoracic esophagus.     

Postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema. A retrospective analysis of associated variables

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the correlation between intravenous fluid administration and postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Large multispecialty group practice hospital. PATIENTS: Adults who had a pneumonectomy performed between 1977 and 1988. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients were identified who had postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema (PPE). Fluid administration and fluid balance information was found in records and compared with age- and sex-matched control patients who did not develop PPE. The side of pneumonectomy was noted for patients in each group. Autopsy findings were recorded for patients who died. Twenty-one patients met PPE criteria. No significant difference was found between groups for fluid administration or fluid balance. Patients who had right pneumonectomy had a significantly higher incidence of PPE. Patients with PPE had a 100 percent mortality rate and histologic evidence of the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at autopsy. CONCLUSIONS: PPE is caused by noncardiogenic pulmonary edema rather than excess intravenous fluid administration. There is a greater incidence of the syndrome with right pneumonectomy for unknown reasons. The mortality rate is high despite interventions for ARDS.     

Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidoses revisited

BACKGROUND: Recalcitrant coagulopathy "the bloody vicious cycle," produces the majority of deaths after torso trauma. A model predicting this life-threatening complication may facilitate clinical decision-making. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed patients > 15 years old who received a massive transfusion (> 10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC)/24 h) over a 2-year period. Excluding massive head injuries and pre-existing disease, the 58 study patients had a mean age = 35.4 years, Injury Severity Score (ISS) = 30.6, and PRBC = 24.2 units/24 h. RESULTS: Defined as prothrombin time of two times that of normal laboratory controls and partial thromboplastin time as two times that of normal laboratory controls, 27 patients (47%) developed life-threatening coagulopathy. Using a multiple logistic regression model, the four significant risk factors (with odds ratio) were (1) pH < 7.10 (12.3), (2) temperature < 34 degrees C (8.7), (3) ISS > 25 (7.7), and (4) systolic blood pressure < 70 mm Hg (5.8). The conditional probability of developing coagulopathy was ISS > 25 + systolic blood pressure < 70 mm Hg = 39%, ISS > 25 + temperature < 34 degrees C = 49%, ISS > 25 + pH < 7.10 = 49%; with all four risk factors the incidence was 98%. CONCLUSION: Postinjury life-threatening coagulopathy in the seriously injured requiring massive transfusion is predicted by persistent hypothermia and progressive metabolic acidosis.     

Septic shock in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognosis of patients with septic shock admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), according to their HIV serostatus. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Medical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 76 patients with septic shock admitted to the same ICU, of whom 28 were HIV positive and 48 were HIV negative. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Severity scores, number and type of organ failures, and survival rates were assessed in the two groups of patients. Glasgow Coma Scale and general severity scores [Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)] were significantly worse in HIV-infected patients. The total number of organ failures was also higher in the HIV-positive group: 3.7 +/- 0.2 vs 3.1 +/- 0.2 in the HIV-negative group (p < 0.001). On day 28, 21 (46%) HIV-negative patients were dead compared to 26 (93%) patients in the HIV-positive group (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, HIV infection was an independent risk factor for mortality, as were the SAPS score, use of mechanical ventilation, and the McCabe score. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a considerable excess mortality in HIV-infected patients with septic shock. Although severity of illness was clearly much more pronounced in HIV-positive patients, retroviral infection was independently associated with death. Improving survival in HIV-positive patients with septic shock may require earlier diagnosis and treatment of the causative infection.     

The sepsis syndrome in a Dutch university hospital. Clinical observations

BACKGROUND: Most studies of the cause of sepsis syndrome focus on patients hospitalized in intensive care units. In this study, we analyzed the incidence, cause, and outcome of the sepsis syndrome in all hospitalized patients. METHODS: Clinical and microbiologic data were obtained for 382 patients (5.6% of all patients admitted) from whom blood was drawn for culture. RESULTS: The incidence of the sepsis syndrome was 13.6 per 1000 patients admitted (1.06 per 1000 hospital days), while the incidence of septic shock was 4.6 per 1000. The respiratory tract was the predominant infection site. Of all patients with sepsis syndrome, 38% (n = 35) had positive blood cultures. More than half of these cultures (13 [57%]) were caused by gram-positive microorganisms (excluding patients receiving selective decontamination of the digestive tract and those with intravascular device-related bacteremias). The mortality for patients with sepsis syndrome without shock was 28% (17/61), while for patients with septic shock, it was 55% (17/31). Patients with cardiovascular diseases had a significantly (P < .005) greater risk of dying during a sepsis syndrome episode than patients with other predisposing factors. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing outcome identified the development of shock and an immunocompromised state as being significantly associated with outcome in patients with sepsis syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients fulfilling the criteria for the sepsis syndrome are at great risk of developing septic shock or multiple-organ failure and subsequently dying. In our hospital, the majority of bacteremic episodes were associated with gram-positive microorganisms.