Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 88-08 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4588: preliminary results of a phase III trial in regionally advanced, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Regionally advanced, surgically unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer represents a disease with an extremely poor prognosis. External-beam irradiation to the primary tumor and regional lymphatics is generally accepted as standard therapy. The use of more aggressive radiation regimens and the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy to radiotherapy have yielded conflicting results. Recently, however, results from clinical trials using innovative irradiation delivery techniques or chemotherapy before irradiation have indicated that patients treated with protocols that incorporate these modifications may have higher survival rates than patients receiving standard radiation therapy. PURPOSE: On the basis of these results, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) elected to conduct a phase III trial comparing the following regimens: 1) standard radiation therapy, 2) induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiation therapy, and 3) twice-daily radiation therapy. METHODS: Patients with surgically unresectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer were potential candidates. Staging was nonsurgical. Patients were required to have a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or more and weight loss less than 5% for 3 months prior to entry into the trial, to be older than 18 years of age, and to have no metastatic disease. Of the 490 patients registered in the trial, 452 were eligible. The disease in 95% of the patients was stage IIIA or IIIB. More than two thirds of the patients had a Karnofsky performance status of more than 80. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 60 Gy of radiation therapy delivered at 2 Gy per fraction, 5 days a week, over a 6-week period (standard radiation therapy); induction chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 29 and 5 mg/m2 vinblastine per week for 5 consecutive weeks beginning on day 1 with cisplatin, followed by standard radiation therapy starting on day 50; or 69.6 Gy delivered at 1.2 Gy per fraction twice daily (hyperfractionated radiation therapy). RESULTS: Toxicity was acceptable, with four treatment-related deaths. Three patients subsequently died of chronic pulmonary complications. Compliance with protocol treatment was acceptable. One-year survival (%) and median survival (months) were as follows: standard radiation therapy--46%, 11.4 months; chemotherapy plus radiotherapy--60%, 13.8 months; and hyperfractionated radiation therapy--51%, 12.3 months. The chemotherapy plus radiotherapy arm was statistically superior to the other two treatment arms (logrank P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In "good-risk" patients with surgically unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, induction chemotherapy followed by irradiation was superior to hyperfractionated radiation therapy or standard radiation therapy alone, yielding a statistically significant short-term survival advantage.     

VACOP-B versus VACOP-B plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicenter randomized study was to compare conventional therapy with conventional plus high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) as front-line treatment for poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1991 and June 1995, 124 patients, aged 15 to 60 years, with diffuse intermediate- to high-grade NHL (Working Formulation criteria), stages II bulky (> or = 10 cm), III, or IV were enrolled. Sixty-one patients were randomized to receive etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (VACOP-B) for 12 weeks and cisplatin, cytarabine, and dexamethasone (DHAP) as a salvage regimen (arm A), and 63 to receive VACOP-B for 12 weeks plus HDT and ABMT (Arm B). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of complete remissions (CRS) in the two groups: 75% in arm A, and 73% in arm B. The median follow-up observation time was 42 months. The 6-year survival probability was 65% in both arms. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. DFS was 60% and 80% (P = .1) and PFS was 48% and 60% (P = .4) for arms A and B, respectively. Procedure feasibility was the major problem. In arm B, 29% of enrolled patients did not undergo HDT and ABMT. A statistical improvement in terms of DFS (P = .008) and a favorable trend in terms of PFS (P = .08) for intermediate-/high- plus high-risk group patients assigned to HDT and ABMT was observed. CONCLUSION: In this study, conventional chemotherapy followed by HDT and ABMT as front-line therapy seems no more successful than conventional treatment in terms of overall results. However, our results suggest that controlled studies of HDT plus ABMT should be proposed for higher risk patients.     

A randomized trial of long term adjuvant tamoxifen plus postoperative radiation therapy versus radiation therapy alone for patients with early stage breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving surgery. Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND: The use of adjuvant tamoxifen to treat postmenopausal breast carcinoma patients as an adjunct to primary surgery is well established. The current study reports the long term results for a low risk stratum in a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen. The main focus of this analysis was to determine whether tamoxifen would result in a reduced local failure rate for lymph node negative, postmenopausal patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: The study population included 432 lymph node negative, postmenopausal patients with invasive breast carcinoma (classified as T1-T2) who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy in Stockholm during the period 1976-1990. The patients constituted a separate stratum of the Stockholm Adjuvant Tamoxifen Trial, which included a total of 2729 patients. Of 432 patients, 213 received 40 mg of tamoxifen daily for either 2 or 5 years. The median follow-up time was 8 years (range, 5-19 years). RESULTS: At 10 years, the overall survival was 90% for the tamoxifen group and 88% for the control group. The event free survival at 10 years was 80% for the tamoxifen group and 70% for the control group (P=0.03). Tamoxifen reduced the overall rate of ipsilateral (hazard ratio=0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.2-0.9, P=0.02) and contralateral breast tumor recurrences (hazard ratio=0.4, 95% CI=0.1-1.1, P=0.06). Trends toward a reduced number of distant metastases (hazard ratio=0.6, 95% CI=0.3-1.2, P=0.1) and deaths due to breast carcinoma (hazard ratio=0.5, 95% CI=0.2-1.2, P=0.1) also were observed. CONCLUSIONS. The addition of tamoxifen to radiotherapy for postmenopausal, lymph node negative breast carcinoma patients treated with breast-conserving surgery resulted in a reduced rate of ipsilateral and contralateral breast tumor recurrences. The avoidance of salvage mastectomies, reexcisions, and new contralateral malignancies justifies the use of tamoxifen even in the treatment of patients with a 10-year survival rate of 90%.     

Phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer treated with selective bladder preservation by combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy: initial results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 89-03

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant methotrexate, cisplatin, and vinblastine (MCV) chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invading bladder cancer treated with selective bladder preservation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three eligible patients with tumor, node, metastasis system clinical stage T2 to T4aNXMO bladder cancer were randomized to receive (arm 1, n=61 ) two cycles of MCV before 39.6-Gy pelvic irradiation with concurrent cisplatin 100 mg/m2 for two courses 3 weeks apart. Patients assigned to arm 2 (n=62) did not receive MCV before concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy. Tumor response was scored as a clinical complete response (CR) when the cystoscopic tumor-site biopsy and urine cytology results were negative. The CR patients were treated with an additional 25.2 Gy to a total of 64.8 Gy and one additional dose of cisplatin. Those with less than a CR underwent cystectomy. The median follow-up of all patients who survived is 60 months. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of the patients completed the protocol with, at most, minor deviations; 67% on arm 1 and 81% on arm 2. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rate was 49%; 48% in arm 1 and 49% in arm 2. Thirty-five percent of the patients had evidence of distant metastases at 5 years; 33% in arm 1 and 39% in arm 2. The 5-year survival rate with a functioning bladder was 38%, 36% in arm 1 and 40% in arm 2. None of these differences are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Two cycles of MCV neoadjuvant chemotherapy were not shown to increase the rate of CR over that achieved with our standard induction therapy or to increase freedom from metastatic disease. There was no impact on 5-year overall survival.