Resistance pattern of 2816 isolates isolated from 17631 blood cultures and etiology of bacteremia and fungemia in a single cancer institution

A phase III, open label randomized study was conducted in 50 patients comparing halothane and sevoflurane for paediatric day case surgery. A graded inhalational induction resulted in only slightly more rapid induction with sevoflurane (3.34 +/- 0.92 versus 3.85 +/- 1.02 minutes; P > 0.05). In children receiving sevoflurane, systolic blood pressure decreased to a lesser extent during induction (143 +/- 19.2 versus 26.9 +/- 10.9 percent decrease from resting values; P < 0.01) and heart rate was maintained. Respiratory events (coughing, breath-holding, bronchospasm, laryngospasm) were more common during induction with halothane, and excitement more common in children receiving sevoflurane. Emergence times were significantly more rapid in children who had received sevoflurane (21.4 +/- 10.9 versus 33.1 +/- 13.7 minutes; P < 0.01). Objective pain/discomfort scores were higher in patients receiving sevoflurane at 10, 20, 30 and 40 minutes after arrival in the recovery room, and the incidence of excitement during emergence was higher in this group. It is concluded that sevoflurane is well tolerated for inhalational induction and has an improved cardiovascular profile compared to halothane. Emergence was significantly more rapid following sevoflurane.     

Simple strategy for sequencing cDNA clones

This randomized, open-label study compared the investigational inhalational anesthetic sevoflurane with isoflurane in 47 healthy women undergoing elective ambulatory surgery. The women were randomized to receive either sevoflurane or isoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide-oxygen. Induction with thiopental 3-6 mg/kg was followed by vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg and fentanyl 0-200 micrograms. Duration of anesthesia, time to emergence, orientation, length of stay in the surgical unit, and hospital discharge were recorded. The emergence, length of stay, and discharge times after discontinuation of sevoflurane were 9.7 +/- 0.7, 120.6 +/- 8.0, and 244 +/- 15 minutes, respectively, and for isoflurane were 11.9 +/- 1.4, 106.8 +/- 7.1, and 282 +/- 24 minutes, respectively (NS). The isoflurane group had a higher frequency of postoperative cough. At the end of surgery, the sevoflurane group received a deeper level of anesthesia (minimum alveolar concentration 1.5 vs 1.3), however, these patients were oriented earlier (13.6 +/- 1.1 min vs 17.0 +/- 1.5 min isoflurane; p = 0.02) after discontinuation of anesthesia, although this difference is of little clinical significance.     

Oral clonidine premedication reduces minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for tracheal intubation in children

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is a useful anesthetic for inhalational induction in children because of its low solubility in blood and relatively nonpungent odor. Clonidine has sedative and anxiolytic properties and reduces the requirement for inhalation agents. Nitrous oxide (N2O) also decreases the requirement of inhaled anesthetics, but the effect is variable. The minimum alveolar concentration for tracheal intubation (MAC(TI)) of sevoflurane was assessed with and without N2O and clonidine premedication. METHODS: Seventy-two patients, aged 3-11 yr, were assigned to one of six groups (n = 12 each). They received one of three preanesthetic medications (two groups for each premedication): placebo (control), 2 microg/kg oral clonidine or 4 microg/kg oral clonidine. In one group of each premedication, anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane in oxygen; in the other group, anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane in the presence of 60% N2O. Each concentration of sevoflurane at which tracheal intubation was attempted was predetermined according to Dixon's up-and-down method and held constant for at least 20 min before the trial RESULTS: The MAC(TI) of sevoflurane in the absence of N2O (mean +/- SEM) was 3.2 +/- 0.2%, 2.5 +/- 0.1%, and 1.9 +/- 0.2% in the control, 2-microg/kg clonidine, and 4-microg/kg clonidine groups, respectively. Nitrous oxide (60%) decreased the MAC(TI) of sevoflurane by 26%, 24%, and 27% in the control, 2-microg/kg clonidine, and 4-microg/kg clonidine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral clonidine premedication decreased the MAC(TI) of sevoflurane. Nitrous oxide also decreased the MAC(TI). The combination of clonidine and N2O lessened the MAC(TI) of sevoflurane more than did either drug alone.     

Increase in serum creatine phosphokinase concentrations after suxamethonium during sevoflurane or isoflurane anaesthesia in children

We have studied whether sevoflurane or isoflurane anaesthesia modulates the effect of suxamethonium on serum concentrations of enzyme markers of skeletal muscle function in paediatric patients. Eighty patients undergoing bilateral tonsillectomy, aged 5-12 yr, were allocated randomly to receive anaesthesia with either sevoflurane and nitrous oxide or isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Serum creatine phosphokinase (CK), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentrations were measured before, and at 30 min and 20 h after induction of anaesthesia. Mean CK concentrations increased from 97.0 (SD 17.3) to 478 (170) iu litre-1 in the sevoflurane group and from 86.9 (22.4) to 628 (223) iu litre-1 in the isoflurane group, 20 h after induction of anaesthesia. Mean peak serum CK concentration in the sevoflurane group (478 (170) iu litre-1) was significantly less (P < 0.05) than that in the isoflurane group (628 (223) iu litre-1). Mean serum AST concentration increased from 17.5 (4.9) to 31.7 (3.5) iu litre-1 in the sevoflurane group and from 17.3 (2.4) to 34.8 (5.7) iu litre-1 in the isoflurane group, 20 h after induction of anaesthesia. Mean peak serum AST concentrations in the sevoflurane group were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than those in the isoflurane group. There were no significant differences in serum ALT or LDH concentrations between the groups either before or after anaesthesia. We conclude that administration of suxamethonium during either sevoflurane or isoflurane anaesthesia caused a marked increase in serum CK concentrations in paediatric patients. The clinical significance of this finding is uncertain.     

Propofol, but not thiopentone or etomidate, enhances isoflurane-induced coronary vasodilatation in dogs

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that thiopentone, propofol, and etomidate alter the coronary vascular effects of abruptly administered isoflurane. METHODS: Dogs (n = 6) received inspired isoflurane 5% in the presence of thiopentone (20 mg.kg-1 induction dose and 20 mg.kg-1.hr-1 infusion), propofol (5 mg.kg-1 induction dose and 40 mg.kg-1.hr-1 infusion), etomidate (2 mg.kg-1 induction dose and 5 mg.kg-1.hr-1 infusion), or isoflurane (1.0 MAC) anaesthesia in a random fashion. Haemodynamics were assessed in the conscious state, during baseline anaesthesia, and at 30 sec intervals for five minutes after beginning isoflurane 5%. RESULTS: Rapidly administered isoflurane caused greater (P < 0.05) reductions in coronary vascular resistance in thiopentone- or propofol--than in isoflurane-anaesthetized dogs. Isoflurane produced greater (P < 0.05) increases in the ratio of coronary blood flow velocity to pressure-work index (an index of myocardial oxygen consumption; +109 +/- 19% during isoflurane alone vs +182 +/- 27% change from baseline during propofol and isoflurane) consistent with relatively greater direct coronary vasodilatation during baseline propofol than during baseline isoflurane anaesthesia. Isoflurane caused larger increases in coronary blood flow velocity in dogs anaesthetized with etomidate concomitant with higher coronary perfusion pressure and pressure-work index than in those anaesthetized with isoflurane alone. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that thiopentone, propofol, and etomidate each uniquely modify the coronary vascular responses to abrupt administration of high inspired concentrations of isoflurane in chronically instrumented dogs.     

Perioperative physiological and cognitive functions following oral premedication with 3.75 mg midazolam in operations with retrobulbar anesthesia

The number of surgical procedures performed as day surgery has significantly increased in recent years. Therefore, a safe and short postoperative recovery period has become increasingly important. The aim of the present study was to investigate perioperative cognitive and physiological function after oral premedication with low-dose midazolam (3.75 mg), especially during the postoperative period. METHODS: Forty-seven men (age > 69 years, weight 50-90 kg) scheduled for elective cataract surgery under retrobulbar anaesthesia (RBA) were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to either group 1 (n = 28), receiving 3.75 mg midazolam p.o. (Dormicum), or group 2 (n = 19), receiving a placebo orally 30 min before RBA. We measured the following parameters: sedation (modified Glasgow coma scale); anxiety (visual analogue scale); numerical and verbal memory (digit span and reproduction of previously presented words); concentration (Revisions test of Stender/Marschner). To identify depression of ventilation, pulse oximetry and nasal end-tidal PCO2 were monitored intraoperatively. RESULTS: After premedication with 3.75 mg midazolam, patients were significantly more sedated (P < 0.01) and systolic blood pressures were significantly reduced (P < 0.05); 30 min after midazolam premedication only concentration was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased. The results of the other cognitive functions did not differ. No differences in cognitive and physiological functions between and groups could be found 2 h after the operation (293 +/- min after premedication). Intraoperatively, there were no significant differences in end-tidal PCO2 and oxygenation between the groups. In both groups anxiety and blood pressure were significantly higher pre- than postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of low-dose midazolam (0.049 +/- mg/kg) seems to be appropriate for premedication before ambulatory surgical procedures in elderly patients. In the interest of patient safety, standardised oral premedication with 3.75 mg midazolam may not be sufficient for some of the patients.     

Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and intravenous anesthesia

The potency and time course of action of rocuronium were studied in patients anesthetized with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of sevoflurane or isoflurane, or a propofol infusion. Potency was estimated by using the single-bolus technique. Neuromuscular block was measured by stimulation of the ulnar nerve and by recording the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. The mean (95% confidence limits) of the 50% and 95% effective doses were estimated tobe 142 (129-157) and 265 (233-301) microg/ kg, 165 (146-187) and 324 (265-396) microg/kg, and 183 (163-207) and 398 (316-502) microg/kg during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, respectively (P < 0.05 for sevoflurane versus propofol). The mean +/- SD times to onset of maximal block after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were 0.96 +/- 0.16, 0.90 +/- 0.16, and 1.02 +/- 0.15 min during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, respectively. The respective times to recovery of the first response in the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation (T1) to 25% and 90% were 45 +/- 13.1 and 83 +/- 29.3 min, 35 +/- 6.1 and 56 +/- 15.9 min, and 35 +/- 9.2 and 55 +/- 19.4 min. The times to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.8 were 103 +/- 30.7, 69 +/- 20.4, and 62 +/- 21.1 min, and the 25%-75% recovery indices were 26 +/- 11.7, 12 +/- 5.0, and 14 +/- 6.9 min, respectively. There were no differences among groups in the times for onset of action or to recovery of T1 to 25%. However, the times for recovery of T1 to 90%, TOF ratio to 0.8, and recovery index in the sevoflurane group were all significantly longer compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.01, respectively). We conclude that the effects of rocuronium, especially duration of action, are significantly enhanced during sevoflurane compared with isoflurane and propofol anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: In routine clinical use, the effects of rocuronium are enhanced by sevoflurane, in comparison with isoflurane and propofol anesthesia, and the recovery is slower. Particular attention should be paid to monitoring of neuromuscular block during sevoflurane anesthesia.     

Midazolam versus placebo before spinal anesthesia

The goal of this randomized, double blind and multicentric study was to compare the effects of midazolam (M) and placebo (P) administered by titration before puncture for spinal anaesthesia on the comfort of 211 patients scheduled for elective surgery after oral premedication with hydroxyzine. The administered dose of midazolam was 3.4 +/- 1.3 mg (mean +/- SD). Anxiety was nil in 92% of the patients of the M group and in 64% of the patients of the P group (p < 0.001) and memorization of the pain of the puncture was reported in 34% of the patients of the M group and in 66% of the patients of the P group (p < 0.001). However cooperation of the patient and easiness of the puncture were similar in both groups. In conclusion titrated sedation with midazolam before puncture for spinal anaesthesia increases the comfort of the patient.     

Inhaled induction and emergence from desflurane anesthesia in the ambulatory surgical patient: the effect of premedication

We studied the effect of premedication (1 microgram/kg fentanyl and 0.04 mg/kg midazolam 5 min before induction of anesthesia) on airway reactivity and hemodynamic stability during inhaled induction using desflurane in 10 ambulatory surgical patients. Eight patients who were anesthetized without premedication served as the controls. Induction and emergence were rapid and unaffected by premedication. End-tidal and inspired concentrations of desflurane at loss of consciousness were significantly reduced by premedication (10.1% end-tidal/14.1% inspired, no premedication, vs. 5.3% end-tidal/8.9% inspired, premedication). Airway irritability was markedly attenuated by premedication (100% no premedication versus 30% premedicated), as was apnea (37.5% no premedication versus 0% premedicated). We observed an increase in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate after loss of consciousness (mean arterial pressure 103 vs 121 mm Hg, heart rate 73 vs 100 bpm) in the unpremedicated patients, whereas both groups demonstrated a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure with no change in heart rate when baseline values were compared to those at incision (103 vs 74 mm Hg, no premedication, 99 vs 81 mm Hg premedicated). Patient acceptability was satisfactory and unchanged by premedication. We recommend the use of such premedication when desflurane is used during the induction of anesthesia.     

Intraoperative vascular monitoring of ipsilateral vs. contralateral TRAM flaps

The effects of halothane and isoflurane followed by subsequent administration of vecuronium on the QT interval have been investigated during the induction of anaesthesia. Fifty-eight children, ASA I, without cardiovascular and electrolyte abnormalities and not receiving any medication were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with either halothane (n = 28) or isoflurane (n = 30), and was maintained until the end of the study with end-tidal concentrations of 2.5-3%. Recordings of ECG, heart rate and systolic arterial pressure were obtained at the following times: prior to induction of anaesthesia; 1 and 3 min after stable end-tidal concentrations of the induction agent had been reached; 1 and 3 min following vecuronium administration; at the time of tracheal intubation; 1 and 3 min later. Halothane significantly shortened the QTc interval (P < 0.05); isoflurane prolonged it (P < 0.001). Heart rate decreased significantly after halothane administration (P < 0.01); in contrast, heart rate increased after induction of anaesthesia with isoflurane (P < 0.05), increasing further after laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (P < 0.001). Systolic arterial pressure decreased significantly (P < 0.001) in both groups after induction of anaesthesia and remained decreased until the end of the study. It is concluded that halothane may be a better choice than isoflurane for children with a long QT interval.     

The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane on hemodynamic responses during an inhaled induction of anesthesia via a mask in humans

A rapid increase in isoflurane or desflurane concentration induces tachycardia and hypertension and increases-plasma catecholamine concentration. Little information is available as to whether sevoflurane, halothane, and enflurane induce similar responses during anesthesia induction via mask. Fifty ASA physical status I patients, aged 20-40 yr, and scheduled for elective minor surgery, received one of four volatile anesthetics: sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, or enflurane. Anesthesia was induced with thiamylal, followed by inhalation of 0.9 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of the anesthetic in 100% oxygen via mask. The inspired concentration of anesthetic was increased by 0.9 MAC every 5 min to a maximum of 2.7 MAC. Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured before and every minute for 15 min during anesthetic inhalation. In the sevoflurane and isoflurane groups, venous blood samples were drawn to determine the concentrations of plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine 3 min after each increase in anesthetic concentration. Sustained increments in HR were observed after increases in inspired isoflurane concentration to 1.8 MAC and 2.7 MAC (peak changes of 15 +/- 3 and 17 +/- 3 bpm, respectively). Isoflurane also increased SBP transiently after the inspired concentration was increased to 2.7 MAC (peak change of 10 +/- 4 mm Hg). Enflurane increased HR after the inspired concentration was increased to 2.7 MAC (peak change of 9 +/- 2 bpm). In contrast, changes in sevoflurane and halothane concentrations did not induce hyperdynamic responses. Plasma norepinephrine concentration in the isoflurane group was significantly higher than that in the sevoflurane group during 2.7 MAC (P = 0.022). We propose that there is a direct relationship between airway irritation of the anesthetic and immediate cardiovascular change during an inhaled induction of anesthesia.     

Acetate-free biofiltration versus bicarbonate haemodialysis in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy: a cross-over multicentric study

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the spinal cord is an important site of anesthetic action that produces surgical immobility. Inhalation anesthetics depress the Hoffmann's reflex (H reflex) and F wave, indicating spinal motoneuron suppression. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between isoflurane-induced immobility and H- and F-wave suppression. METHODS: The baseline H reflex and F wave were measured before anesthesia in 15 adult patients. After induction, 1% end-tidal isoflurane was maintained for 20 min before the H and F waves were reelicited. Using an electric stimulus applied to the forearm and grading the response as movement or no movement, the authors increased or decreased the isoflurane concentration in 0.1% steps, depending on the movement responses. The H and F waves were recorded 20 min after each change of isoflurane concentration. The correlation between H- and F-wave suppression and surgical immobility was analyzed using a paired t test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: H-reflex amplitude (2.74 +/- 1.63 mV) and F-wave persistence (70.69 +/- 26.19%) at the highest isoflurane concentration that allowed movement response to a stimulus are different (P < 0.01) from these (1.97 +/- 1.46 mV; 43.16 +/- 22.91%) at the lowest isoflurane concentration that suppressed response. At 0.8% isoflurane, the H-reflex amplitude was 3.69 +/- 1.83 mV with movement and 1.01 +/- 1.14 mV without movement (P < 0.01); F-wave amplitude was 0.29 +/- 0.15 mV with movement and 0.11 +/- 0.06 mV without movement (P < 0.01); F-wave persistence was 80 +/- 22.36% with movement and 34.9 +/- 25.75% without movement (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of H- and F-wave amplitude and F-wave persistence suppression correlates with movement response, suggesting that isoflurane-suppressive action in the spinal cord plays a significant role in producing surgical immobility.     

Drug retention, efflux, and resistance in tumor cells

This prospective, randomized trial of paediatric surgical outpatients, premedicated with oral midazolam, was designed to determine if an intravenous thiopentone induction of anaesthesia prolongs postoperative recovery compared to an inhalation induction with halothane. One hundred children, one to ten years of age, undergoing ENT surgical procedures of 30-60 min duration received midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 with atropine 0.03 mg.kg-1 and were randomized to either halothane (Group 1, n = 50) or a thiopentone induction (Group 2, n = 50) technique, followed by a standardized anaesthetic-protocol. Time to extubation was significantly greater in the thiopentone group (8.8 +/- 4 min vs 7.1 +/- 3 min, P < 0.05). Patients receiving thiopentone were also more sedated than the halothane group on arrival in the PARR (3.9 +/- 1.5, 3.3 +/- 1.7, respectively P < 0.05), but the differences disappeared after 30 min. Children premedicated with oral midazolam who receive an intravenous thiopentone induction have a slightly prolonged emergence from anesthesia compared to children induced with halothane.     

A phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative study evaluating the effect of sevoflurane versus isoflurane on the maintenance of anesthesia in adult ASA class I, II, and III inpatients

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of sevoflurane and isoflurane when used for the maintenance of anesthesia in adult ASA I, II, and III inpatients undergoing surgical procedures of at least 1 hour's duration. DESIGN: Phase III, randomized, open-label clinical trial. SETTING: 12 international surgical units. PATIENTS: 555 consenting inpatients undergoing surgeries of intermediate duration. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received either sevoflurane (n = 272) or isoflurane (n = 283) as their primary anesthetic drug, each administered in nitrous oxide (N2O) (up to 70%) and oxygen (O2) after an intravenous induction using thiopental and low-dose fentanyl. The concentration of volatile drug was kept relatively constant but some titration in response to clinical variable was permitted. Comparison of efficacy was based on observations made of the rapidly and ease of recovery from anesthesia and the frequency of untoward effects for the duration of anesthesia in the return of orientation. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse experiences, hematologic and non-laboratory testing, and physical assessments. In 25% of patients (all patients 171 both treatment groups at selected investigational sites), plasma inorganic fluoride concentrations were determined preoperatively, every 2 hours during maintenance, at the end of anesthesia, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Emergence, response to commands, orientation, and the first request for postoperative analgesia were all more rapid following discontinuation of sevoflurane than following discontinuation of isoflurane (sevoflurane, 11.0 +/- 0.6, 12.8 +/- 0.7, 17.2 +/- 0.9, 46.1 +/- 3.0 minutes, respectively, versus isoflurane, 16.4 +/- 0.6, 18.4 +/- 0.7, 24.7 +/- 0.9, 55.4 +/- 3.2 minutes). The incidence of adverse experiences was similar for sevoflurane and isoflurane patients. Forty-eight percent of patients on the sevoflurane group had no untoward effect versus 39% in the isoflurane group. Three patients who received sevoflurane had serum inorganic fluoride levels 50 microM/I. or greater though standard tests indicated no evidence of associated renal dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane anesthesia, as compared with isoflurane, may be advantageous in providing a smoother clinical course with a more rapid recover.     

Endocrine stress reaction, hemodynamics and recovery in total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia. Propofol versus isoflurane

This prospective, randomised study compared total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anaesthesia with respect to endocrine stress response, haemodynamic reactions, and recovery. METHODS. The investigation included two groups of 20 ASA I-II patients 18-60 years of age scheduled for orthopaedic surgery. For premedication of both groups, 0.1 mg/kg midazolam was injected IM. Patients in the propofol group received TIVA (CPPV, PEEP 5 mbar, air with oxygen FiO2 33%) with propofol (2 mg/kg for induction followed by an infusion of 12-6 mg/kg.h) and fentanyl (0.1 mg before intubation, total dose 0.005 mg/kg before surgery, repetition doses 0.1 mg). For induction of patients in the isoflurane-group, 5 mg/kg thiopentone and 0.1 mg fentanyl was administered. Inhalation anaesthesia was maintained with 1.2-2.4 vol.% isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen at a ratio of 2:1 (CPPV, PEEP 5 mbar). For intubation of both groups, 2 mg vecuronium and 1.5 mg/kg suxamethonium were injected, followed by a total dose of 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium. Blood samples were taken through a central venous line at eight time points from before induction until 60 min after extubation for analysis of adrenaline, noradrenaline (by HPLC/ECD), antidiuretic hormone (ADH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and cortisol (by RIA). In addition, systolic arterial pressure (SAP) heart rate (HR), arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and recovery from anaesthesia were observed. RESULTS. Group mean values are reported; biometric data from both collectives were comparable (Table 1). Plasma levels of adrenaline (52 vs. 79 pg/ml), noradrenaline 146 vs. 217 pg/ml), and cortisol (82 vs. 165 ng/ml) were significantly lower in the propofol group (Table 2, Figs. 1 and 3). Plasma levels of ADH (4.8 vs. 6.1 pg/ml) and ACTH (20 vs. 28 pg/ml) did not differ between the groups (Table 2, Figs 2 and 3). SAP (128 vs. 131 mmHg) was comparable in both groups, HR (68/min vs. 83/min) was significantly lower in the propofol group, and SpO2 (97.1 vs 97.4%) showed no significant difference (Table 3). Recovery from anaesthesia was slightly faster in the propofol group (following of simple orders 1.9 vs. 2.4 min, orientation with respect to person 2.4 vs. 3.4 min, orientation with respect to time and space 2.8 vs. 3.7 min), but differences failed to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS. When compared with isoflurane inhalation anaesthesia, moderation of the endocrine stress response was significantly improved during and after TIVA with propofol and fentanyl. Slightly shorter recovery times did not lead to an increased stress response. With respect to intra- and postoperative stress reduction, significant attenuation of sympatho-adrenergic reaction comparable SAP and reduced HR, sympatholytic and hypodynamic anaesthesia with propofol and fentanyl seems to be advantageous for patients with cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. For this aim, careful induction and application of individual doses is essential.     

A case report of complete inversion of the bladder in an old woman

BACKGROUND: The inhaled anaesthetic desflurane is characterized by a rapid wash-in and wash-out and may be useful for short paediatric ENT procedures. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the effects of desflurane or isoflurane on intubating conditions and recovery characteristics in paediatric ENT patients. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised investigation, we studied 44 children scheduled for ENT surgery, aged 4-12 yr and classified ASA I-II. After thiopentone induction (5-8 mg/kg) the lungs were ventilated by face mask and the vaporizer was dialed to 1 MAC (age-adapted) of desflurane of isoflurane. A reduced dose of vecuronium (0.05 mg/kg) was administered, and intubating conditions were rated 3 min later. Following tracheal intubation, 50% nitrous oxide were added, and the concentration of desflurane or isoflurane was adjusted according to clinical needs. At the end of surgery all anaesthetics were discontinued simultaneously and recovery times were recorded. RESULTS: Intubating conditions were rated significantly better for desflurane (excellent or good 20 of 22) than for isoflurane (12 of 22). Recovery times were significantly shorter for desflurane than for isoflurane (mean +/- SE): spontaneous ventilation 4.0 +/- 0.5 min vs. 6.0 +/- 0.7 min, extubation 8.4 +/- 0.7 vs. 11.4 +/- 1.1 min and arrival at PACU 11.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 16.6 +/- 1.5 min. No airway complications (coughing, laryngospasm, or desaturation < 97%) were noted for either anaesthetic. CONCLUSIONS: Following an intravenous induction improved intubating conditions, shorter recovery times and the lack of airway complications make desflurane a suitable alternative to isoflurane for paediatric ENT anaesthesia.     

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials during isoflurane anaesthesia

PURPOSE: The effect of isoflurane on the subcortical P14 component of the median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) is poorly known. We studied whether the P14 wave from the upper brainstem, recorded with a nasopharyngeal electrode, was attenuated at the isoflurane-induced EEG burst-suppression level. We also compared the effect of isoflurane on the P14, cervical N13 and cortical N20, N35 and N6, components. METHODS: Seventeen elective patients were anaesthetized with isoflurane. Somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded prior to anaesthesia, at 0.5 MAC and 1 MAC end-tidal isoflurane as well as at the level when EEG was in burst-suppression (mean 1.9 vol% end-tidal isoflurane). RESULTS: Isoflurane had varying effects on the subcortical components of median SEP. The amplitude of nasopharyngeal P14 was stable, but the mean latency increased from 14.4 +/- 1.2 msec at 0.5 MAC to 15.2 +/- 1.1 msec at burst-suppression level (P < 0.05). In contrast, the N13 neck response amplitude was attenuated from 3.3 +/- 0.6 microV to 2.6 +/- 0.5 microV (P < 0.005) without latency changes. The latency of the cortical N20 wave was increased from 19.7 +/- 1.1 msec at awake to 24.4 +/- 1.6 msec at burst-suppression level (P < 0.0001) and amplitude was reduced from 3.3 +/- 1.1 microV to 1.3 +/- 0.6 microV (P < 0.0001). The later cortical components were attenuated even during 0.5 MAC isoflurane and were not recordable during EEG burst-suppression. CONCLUSION: We conclude that P14 can reliably be recorded with nasopharyngeal electrodes during isoflurane anaesthesia, even during EEG burst-suppression, when the N20 wave is attenuated. In contrast, the middle-latency SEP components are sensitive to isoflurane anaesthesia.     

Preservation of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction during sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia compared to the conscious state in chronically instrumented dogs

BACKGROUND: The authors' objective was to assess the extent to which sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia alter the magnitude of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction compared with the response measured in the same animal in the conscious state. METHODS: Left pulmonary vascular pressure-flow plots were generated in seven chronically instrumented dogs by continuously measuring the pulmonary vascular pressure gradient (pulmonary arterial pressure-left atrial pressure) and left pulmonary blood flow during gradual (approximately 1 min) inflation of a hydraulic occluder implanted around the right main pulmonary artery. Pressure-flow plots were generated during normoxia and hypoxia on separate days in the conscious state, during sevoflurane (approximately 3.5% end-tidal), and during desflurane (approximately 10.5% end-tidal) anesthesia. Values are mean+/-SEM. RESULTS: In the conscious state, administration of the hypoxic gas mixture by conical face mask decreased (P < 0.01) systemic arterial PO2 from 94+/-2 mmHg to 50+/-1 mmHg and caused a leftward shift (P < 0.01) in the pressure-flow relationship, indicating pulmonary vasoconstriction. The magnitude of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the conscious state was flow-dependent (P < 0.01). Neither anesthetic had an effect on the baseline pressure-flow relationship during normoxia. The magnitude of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction during sevoflurane and desflurane was also flow-dependent (P < 0.01). Moreover, at any given value of flow the magnitude of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction was similar during sevoflurane and desflurane compared with the conscious state. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is preserved during sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia compared with the conscious state. Thus, inhibition of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is not a general characteristic of inhalational anesthetics. The flow-dependent nature of the response should be considered when assessing the effects of physiologic or pharmacologic interventions on the magnitude of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.     

Transduction of cultured oligodendrocytes from normal and twitcher mice by a retroviral vector containing human galactocerebrosidase (GALC) cDNA

We examined in mice the effect of chronic diazepam treatment on the sensitivity to isoflurane, and that of repeated isoflurane exposure on the sensitivity to diazepam. Mice were divided into four groups: group 1, treated with diazepam, 10 mg/kg i.p. twice daily; group 2, vehicle-treated controls; group 3, exposed to 3% isoflurane for 25 min twice daily; and group 4, untreated controls. After 14 days the effect of the treatment was assessed. Twenty-four hours after the last 10 mg/kg diazepam treatment, groups 1 and 2 received diazepam, 5 mg/kg i.p., and were subjected to the horizontal wire test (HWT). All control mice but only 10% of the diazepam-treated mice failed the HWT. Groups 1 and 2 were then exposed to increasing concentrations of isoflurane. Diazepam-treated mice (group 1) lost the HWT at 0.7+/-0.7%, compared with 0.6+/-0.1% in controls (group 2) (P<0.001); the ED50 was 0.75% vs. 0.65%. Group 1 mice lost the righting reflex at 0.94+/-0.07% isoflurane vs. 0.87+/-0.06% in group 2 (P<0.01); the ED50 was 0.93% vs. 0.82%. Recovery time was 175+/-161 s in group 1 vs. 343+/-275 s in group 2 (P<0.02). Twenty-four hours after the last of the repeated exposures to isoflurane, we examined the responses of groups 3 and 4 to increasing concentrations of isoflurane. Mice in group 3 lost the righting reflex at 1.0+/-0.06% isoflurane vs. 0.9+/-0.04% in controls (group 4) (P<0.001); the ED50 was 0.96% vs. 0.85%. Recovery time was 113+/-124 s vs. 208+/-126 s in groups 3 and 4 (P<0.09). Diazepam, 3 mg/kg i.p. administered to groups 3 and 4, caused loss of the HWT reflex in 33% of group 3 mice and in 82% of controls (group 4) (P<0.001). It appears that prolonged exposure to both diazepam and isoflurane caused reduced sensitivity to each drug separately, as well as to the other drug. This finding may strengthen the theory that inhalational anesthetics may act via the same mechanism as the benzodiazepines.     

Relation between impedance and electrode temperature during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy, impact on hemodynamics, safety profiles, and cost of combined administration of propofol and midazolam (synergistic sedation) vs. midazolam and propofol administered as sole agents, for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Intensive care unit of SCIAS-Hospital de Barcelona. PATIENTS: Seventy-five mechanically ventilated patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery under low-dose opioid anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: According to the double-blind method, patients were randomly assigned to receive propofol (n = 25), midazolam (n = 25), or propofol combined with midazolam (n = 25). Infusion rates were adjusted to stay between 8 and 11 points on Glasgow Coma Score modified by Cook and Palma. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean +/- SD duration of sedation was 14.4 +/- 1.5 hrs, 14.1 +/- 1.1 hrs, and 14.7 +/- 1.9 hrs for the propofol, midazolam, and synergistic groups, respectively. The induction dose was 0.55 +/- 0.05 mg/kg for propofol as sole agent, 0.05 +/- 0.01 mg/kg for midazolam as sole agent, and 0.22 +/- 0.03 mg/kg for propofol administered in combination with 0.02 +/- 0.00 mg/kg of midazolam (p = .001). The maintenance dose was 1.20 +/- 0.03 mg/kg/hr for propofol as sole agent, 0.08 +/- 0.01 mg/kg/hr for midazolam as sole agent, and 0.50 +/- 0.09 mg/kg/hr for propofol administered in combination with 0.03 +/- 0.01 mg/kg/hr of midazolam (p < .001). All sedative regimens achieved similar efficacy in percentage of hours of adequate sedation (93% for propofol, 88% for midazolam, and 90% for the synergistic group, respectively). After induction, both propofol and midazolam groups had significant decreases in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, left atrial pressure, and heart rate. Patients in the synergistic group had significant bradycardia throughout the study, without impairment in other hemodynamic parameters. Patients sedated with propofol or synergistic regimen awoke sooner and could be extubated before those patients sedated with midazolam (0.9 +/- 0.3 hrs and 1.2 +/- 0.6 hrs vs. 2.3 +/- 0.8 hrs, respectively, p = .01). Synergistic sedation produced cost savings of 28% with respect to midazolam and 68% with respect to propofol. CONCLUSIONS: In the study conditions, the new synergistic treatment with propofol and midazolam administered together is an effective and safe alternative for sedation, with some advantages over the conventional regimen with propofol or midazolam administered as sole agents, such as absence of hemodynamic impairment, >68% reduction in maintenance dose, and lower pharmaceutical cost.