Outcome of mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones in an unselected series of 704 patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This paper evaluates the potential benefit of non mechanical bile duct stone lithotripsy techniques. The efficacy, limitations and risks of mechanical lithotripsy as first choice procedure were studied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed by Erlangen-type papillotomes, stone extraction by Olympus baskets and mechanical lithotripsy by the Wurbs-system. In an unselected series of 704 patients, everyone with common bile and hepatic duct stones (independent of size, number, location and stone consistency) was included in the study. RESULTS: Complete stone clearance by endoscopic sphincterotomy and basket extraction was possible in 87.6%. Additional mechanical lithotripsy led to a success rate of 98.4% and in combination with ESWL of 98.5%. In 11 patients without possibility of endoscopic stone removal (1.6%), 4 had no access transpapillary (B-II-situs or duodenal diverticulum), 5 anatomical problems (S-shaped common bile duct, intrahepatic stones or impacted stones in cystic duct orifice), and 2 refused further endoscopic interventions. Complication rate was 1.4% (thereof 1.1% successful treatment by endoscopic or surgical means), lethality rate 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A very high rate of stone clearance by standard endoscopic procedures is possible. In those patients where mechanical lithotripsy is not successful, other non-surgical lithotriptic procedures either cannot be applied because of anatomical reasons or if performed, the improvement in success rate is marginal.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and lithiasis of the common bile duct: prospective study on the importance of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment of symptomatic gallstones. At present, no consensus has been reached on the diagnostic and therapeutic methods of concomitant common bile duct stones. Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy during the same anesthetic procedure could be a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients underwent a prospective endoscopic ultrasonographic evaluation prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Fourty-four patients (35%) had at least one predictive factor for common bile duct stones. Endoscopic ultrasonography and cholecystectomy were performed on the same day. Endoscopic ultrasonography was followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy by the same endoscopist in case of common bile duct stones on endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients were routinely followed up between 3 and 6 months and one year after cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Endoscopic ultrasonography suggested common bile duct stones in 21 patients (17%). Endoscopic ultrasonography identified a stone in 17 of 44 patients (38.6%) with predictor of common bile duct stones and only in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) without predictor of common bile duct stone. Among these 21 patients, one patient was not investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because of the high risk of sphincterotomy, 19 patients had a stone removed after sphincterotomy, one patient had no visible stone neither on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, nor on exploration of the common bile duct after sphincterotomy. Endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in 104 patients (83%). However, two patients in this group were investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because endoscopic ultrasonography was incomplete in one case and because endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in the second case but a stone in the left hepatic duct was detected by ultrasonography. A stone was removed after endoscopic sphincterotomy in these two patients. In the group of 102 patients without stone, 91 out of 92, continued to be asymptomatic during a median follow-up of 8.5 months. One patient with symptoms one month after cholecystectomy underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy but no stone was found. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy is a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct for all patients. This alternative is only justifiable in patients with predictor of common bile duct stones.     

Ca(2+)-permeable, outwardly-rectifying K+ channels in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana

Advances in cannulation techniques and instruments have helped in difficult bile duct cannulation and thus stone extraction. For small common bile duct (CBD) stones, endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation has been proposed as an alternative to endoscopic papillotomy (EPT). The technique must undergo further evaluation before recommending its routine use. For most patients with bile duct stones, EPT remains the method of choice. Out of 8204 patients treated in three surgical endoscopy centers (Chile, Germany, and India), 86% to 91% of all CBD stones could be extracted subsequently after EPT using a Dormia basket; 4% to 7% required mechanical lithotripsy (ML) before removal and 3% to 10% of the patients needed other sophisticated techniques, such as electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL), or extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The local expertise and availability of equipment determines the choice of method used. In general, EHL or LISL is used for impacted CBD stones including stones in Mirizzi syndrome refractory to ML. ESWL is best suited for intrahepatic stones. Permanent stenting can be offered to poor risk patients instead of extensive procedures to clear the bile duct. Using currently available nonsurgical techniques, fewer than 1% of all patients with bile duct stones still require surgical intervention.     

Current results of endoscopic sphincterotomy for lithiasis of the common bile duct

Between January 1989 and June 1990, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 308 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones (mean age: 74 years). Complete clearance of common bile duct was achieved at the first attempt in 65% of cases. This rate was significantly related to the size and the number of biliary stones. The success rate reached 97 percent after repeated endoscopic sessions (127 patients), mechanical lithotripsy (20 patients), extracorporeal or intracorporeal lithotripsy (18 and 11 patients, respectively). During the month following the endoscopic sphincterotomy, 39 patients (13%) developed one or more complications and 11 patients (3.7%) died. The complication rate was related to the time elapsed between biliary opacification and endoscopic sphincterotomy (P = 0.04) and between endoscopic sphincterotomy and total common bile duct clearance (P = 0.0007). No patient younger than 75 years died, but death occurred in 4.5% of the patients older than 75 years. Thirty patients (10%) developed endoscopic sphincterotomy-related complications. Cholangitis and bleeding were the most frequent complications (4 and 2%, respectively). Cholangitis occurred more frequently among the patients older than 75 (P < 0.05) or when transhepatic guided endoscopic sphincterotomy or intracorporeal lithotripsy was used (P < 0.005). Cholangitis led to death in 2 patients, 86 and 87 years old (0.7%). Endoscopic sphincterotomy related complications developed within 48 hours in all but 4 patients (2 patients with pancreatitis and 2 patients with cholecystitis).     

Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones: results in 60 patients using a rhodamine 6G dye laser with optical stone tissue detection system

INTRODUCTION: Laser lithotripsy of bile duct stones has become a widely accepted endoscopic treatment modality for giant, impacted, or very hard stones. The procedure is usually carried out under direct endoscopic control in view of the potential risk of bile duct injuries in "blind" laser application. AIMS: To investigate the use of a rhodamine 6G laser lithotriptor with an integrated optical stone tissue detection system (oSTDS). METHODS: From 1 September 1991 to 7 March 1997, 60 patients with giant or impacted common bile duct stones refractory to endoscopic papillotomy stone extraction, and mechanical lithotripsy were treated via the endoscopic retrograde route using a rhodamine 6G dye laser (595 nm, 2.5 micros, 80-150 mJ pp, Lithognost Telemit/Baasel Corp., Germany) with integrated oSTDS. In case of tissue contact oSTDS cuts off the laser pulse after 190 ns (transmission of 5-8% of the total pulse energy). 47 patients (78.3%) were subjected to x ray targeting (oSTDS) alone, five (8.3%) to choledochoscope targeting alone, and eight (13.3%) to both techniques. RESULTS: At the end of treatment 52 (87%) patients were completely stone-free. The only major complications included transient haemobilia, cholangitis, and pancreatitis in five patients. All five were successfully treated by conservative methods. CONCLUSIONS: Laser lithotripsy using the described rhodamine 6G dye laser with oSTDS seems to be safe and effective and allows "blind" fragmentation of difficult common bile duct stones under radiological control only.     

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of common bile duct calculi

Fifteen patients with stones in the common bile duct, in whom treatment with endoscopic papillotomy and stone-extraction had been unsuccessful were treated with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Nine patients were stone-free after one or two sessions, and two patients after further endoscopic treatment. One patient achieved partial clearance and palliation. One patient had a choledochoduodenostomy performed due to ineffectiveness of the shockwave lithotripsy. Two patients, who were thought to have a stone, turned out to have neoplasma in the common bile duct. Complications were frequent but temporary and needed no treatment. We conclude that extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is a valuable and safe alternative in those cases where conventional endoscopic treatment has failed, and should be considered before operation, especially to old for high-risk patients.     

Intra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of complex lithiasis of the bile ducts. Comparison of endoscopic techniques and long-term results

OBJECTIVES: About 2% of common bile duct stones and most intra-hepatic stones cannot be removed by conventional endoscopy. Intra-corporeal lithotripsy is an alternative technique for these patients. Contact lithotripsy can be obtained by a pulsed dye laser or by electro-hydraulic shockwaves. We compared and assessed the results of these two methods. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (79 +/- 9.8 years, 25 women and 12 men) underwent laser lithotripsy (n = 21), electro-hydraulic lithotripsy (n = 9) or both methods consecutively (n = 7) for common bile duct stones (n = 31), intra-hepatic stones (n = 3) or diffuse lithiasis (n = 3). The mean diameter of the largest stone was 23 +/- 12 mm. Lithotripsy was performed by a retrograde approach in 35 cases and a combined, retrograde and transhepatic approach in 2 cases. RESULTS: The mean number of lithotripsy sessions was 1.5 +/- 0.65. The overall success rate (free bile ducts with patent drainage) was 95%. In 2 patients, stones were not fully extracted: one underwent surgery, the other one was treated conservatively with antibiotics. The duration of the hospital stay was 9.3 +/- 4.5 days. Morbidity at 30 days was 27% and only one case of major morbidity (hemorrhage after sphincterotomy, 2.7%) was observed. There were no procedure-related mortality. Electro-hydraulic and laser groups did not differ significantly for success rate, morbidity and time spent at hospital. Follow-up information was obtained in 34 patients (91.8%) a median of 17 months after lithotripsy (range: 4.52 months). Ten patients died of non-biliary diseases. Two patients (5.8%) developed biliary symptoms 24 and 34 months after lithotripsy, one after unsuccessful lithotripsy. CONCLUSION: Intra-corporeal lithotripsy is a valuable tool for the most complex cases of duct stones, and with an acceptable morbidity. The results of the two techniques are similar. Late biliary complications after intra-corporeal lithotripsy appear to be rare.     

The vaccine adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillary dilation (EPD) by balloon in the management of bile duct stones has recently been claimed to be effective for removing bile duct stones. METHODS: Without endoscopic sphincterotomy, we attempted to remove large or multiple bile duct stones through EPD combined with drip infusion of isosorbide dinitrate in 35 patients. Isosorbide dinitrate, at a rate of 5 mg/h, was administered intravenously, and a balloon dilator with a 10-mm diameter was inflated within 3 min across the papilla. Stones were then smashed using a mechanical lithotriptor, and the fragments were extracted with a basket or the balloon. RESULTS: Extraction of stones was successful in 33 (94%) of 35 patients by the combined therapy. Two of them (6%) developed mild pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: EPD combined with medical sphincter dilation was effective for large and multiple bile duct stones.     

Medical management of common bile duct stones

Common bile duct stones are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in adults. An increasing number of surgical and medical therapies are available to manage them, with different success rates reported. The various medical treatment strategies were developed during the last decade, but these medical modalities should not be contemplated as a first-line alternative of treatment. A consensus from experts is that there is no primary indication to use solvents on common bile duct stones because they have a relatively high rate of adverse effects and their success is limited compared with lithotripsy. However, there is a subgroup of patients in whom invasive or surgical treatment is risky or may fail. In these patients stone dissolution by solvent may constitute a plausible therapeutic alternative or may help reduce the size of the stones sufficiently to facilitate subsequent endoscopic extraction. Solvents may also be indicated in settings where endoscopic techniques or lithotripsy are not available and the patient has a T-tube in the common bile duct. Even in this condition, however, it is probably quicker and more effective to refer the patient to a center with expertise and technologic support to practice stone removal.     

Dormia baskets impacted in the bile duct: release by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones may be complicated by impaction of the Dormia basket with captured stones, or rupture of the traction wire of the basket during mechanical lithotripsy. In an attempt to release impacted baskets by nonoperative means, we studied the efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in this dangerous clinical situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen extracorporeal shock-wave treatments were performed in 12 consecutive patients (eight women and four men; mean age 73.2 +/- 13.2 years, range 46-86 years) with an electrohydraulic shock-wave lithotriptor, using fluoroscopy (n = 13) or ultrasound (n = 1) for targeting. A total of 1845 +/- 334 (mean +/- SD) shock-wave discharges at a voltage of 22 +/- 4 kV were delivered per treatment. Nine treatment sessions (64%) were performed while patients were under general anesthesia. An attempt to extract the Dormia basket was made after disintegration of the captured stone had been confirmed by fluoroscopy. RESULTS: It was possible to remove the Dormia basket by nonsurgical means in 11 of the 12 patients (92%) after one treatment session, and after three treatment sessions in the remaining patient. Thus, disintegration of the stones allowed extraction of the Dormia basket in all patients. None of the patients needed surgical intervention. All patients were rendered free of bile duct stones after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and subsequent endoscopic removal of the fragments. No adverse effects of shock-wave therapy with subsequent extraction of the Dormia baskets were observed. CONCLUSION: Shock-wave therapy represents a primary nonsurgical therapeutic option in patients with either impacted Dormia baskets or broken devices which cannot be extracted by endoscopic means.     

In vitro activity and clinical evaluation of cefixime in urinary tract infection

BACKGROUND: The management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) in the era of operative laparoscopy is evolving. Several minimally invasive techniques to remove CBDS have been described, including preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), postoperative ERCP, lithotripsy, laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration, and laparoscopic choledochotomy with common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Because of the risks and limitations of these procedures, we utilize laparoscopically placed endobiliary stents as an adjunct to CBDE. METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) by either choledochotomy or the transcystic technique with placement of endobiliary stents. These patients were identified during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as having occult choledocholithiasis, using routine dynamic intraoperative cholangiography. RESULTS: CBDS were successfully removed in all patients as demonstrated by completion cholangiography and intraoperative choledochoscopy. Eighty percent of patients were discharged the following day; the first three patients in this series were observed for 48 h prior to discharge. No patient required T-tube placement and closed suction drains were removed the morning after surgery. Stents were removed endoscopically at 1 month. Six- to 30-month follow-up demonstrates no complications to date. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting reduces operative morbidity, eliminates the complications of T-tubes, and allows patients to return to unrestricted activity quickly. We recommend laparoscopically placed endobiliary stents in patients undergoing LCBDE.     

Control of the mutagenicity of arylamines by protein kinases and phosphatases: II. Lack of response of rat liver N-acetyl transferases to phosphorylation modulators

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic sphincterotomy has become a generally accepted method for extracting common bile duct stones in high risk or cholecystectomized patients. However, stone extraction is impossible by the usual methods in 5 to 10% of cases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a recently developed solvent system in patients with large bile duct stones. METHODS: Forty four patients (15 men and 29 women, median age of years) underwent contact dissolution after unsuccessful Dormia extraction. Solvents were administered via a nasobiliary catheter in 41 patients following papillotomy and through a T-tube in 3 patients. Solvent mixtures (26 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, 40 mM sodium deoxycholate and 30% dimethyl sulfoxide in an alkaline aqueous solution; and a 70/30 dimethyl sulfoxide/methyl tert-butyl ether mixture) were infused continuously and alternatively for 2 hours. RESULTS: Bile duct stones disappeared in 13-24 hours of infusion in 11 patients. In 29 patients, a clear reduction in stone volume occurred, allowing complete endoscopic extraction of the fragments. In 4 patients, the size of the stone did not change. Only mild and transient side-effects including abdominal pain (68%), nausea (72%), vomiting (52%), diarrhea and sleepiness (50%) were observed. CONCLUSION: Direct dissolution therapy could be an effective method for the non-surgical management of large bile duct stones in selected patients when intra- or extracorporeal lithotripsy is unsuccessful.     

Control of the temporal aspect when considering risk factors for acute otitis media

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, initially performed in France in 1987, has rapidly spread to other European countries, the United States, and elsewhere. Of the techniques that have evolved, the "French" technique, in which the surgeon stands between the patient's legs, and the "American" technique, in which the surgeon stands on the patient's left side, are the most commonly used. In the former technique, the liver is retracted via the mid-clavicular cannula and the infundibulum of the gallbladder via the anterior axillary port. In the latter technique, the liver is retracted by axial traction on the gallbladder through the anterior axillary cannula and the infundibulum through the mid-clavicular cannula. This position may increase the risk of bile duct injury. The technique selected for operative cholangiography should be adapted to the problem at hand. Cystic duct cholangiography shows ductal calculi more reliably due to better filling of the common bile duct; direct puncture of the gallbladder is safer when the biliary anatomy is unclear. A number of European studies confirm the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Mortality rates vary between 0% and 0.1%, and duct injury rates range between 0.2% and 0.6%. Conversion, which is done in 3% to 8% of cases, may be necessary in the case of uncontrollable hemorrhage, bile duct injury unsuitable for laparoscopic repair, or if the gallbladder is densely scarred (scleroatrophic). It can also be done for safety reasons, when the anatomy is unclear. Complications include bile collections due to accessory duct or cystic duct stump leaks or less commonly to common duct injury. The average postoperative stay is longer in Europe (3.2 days) than in the United States. A decision tree is presented for the management of common bile duct stones. In general, preoperatively identified ductal stones are removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy, which is then followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy to remove the source of the calculi. The techniques of laparoscopic choledochotomy and transcystic exploration for the removal of stones in the common bile duct are only beginning to be used, but they may well prove to be the most popular procedures. Results with these procedures will need to be evaluated against those obtained with endoscopic sphincterotomy.     

Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic approach in patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND: The Optimal management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains controversial. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 145 of the 481 patients who had a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram before their laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram was successful in 138 patients (95%), and common duct calculi were found in 72 (50%) of them. Endoscopic sphincterotomy with ductal clearance was achieved in 62 of 67 patients during a mean of 1.4 sessions (range, 1 to 5). Five (3.4%) patients had complications after endoscopic intervention, all of which resolved uneventfully . Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopic common duct exploration, five had failed endoscopic extraction, five had their common duct stones left intentionally for laparoscopic intervention, and, in addition, four of the seven patients who had a failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram had stones identified by intraoperative cholangiogram. Ten of these 14 patients underwent a successful laparoscopic common duct exploration. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully completed in 134 of the 145 patients, and none had major intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean postoperative stay was 2.7 days for those patients who underwent a successful laparoscopic procedure. The overall mean number of admissions for completing the treatment was 2.3. CONCLUSIONS: Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic approach is a viable option for patients with gallstones and choledocholithiasis.     

Endoscopic sphincterotomy for lithotripsy (EST-L) of bile duct stones

We performed EST-L for 555 patients with choledocholithiasis between 1981 and 1992. With the aid of conventional occlusion balloons and dormia-type baskets, calculi < or = 1.5 cm was extracted with relative ease. In patients with larger stone (> 1.5 cm), the mechanical lithotripter, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and electrohydrolic lithotripsy were used for the lithotripsy. The overall success rate was 95%. Important early and late complications from these procedures occurred in 6.9% and 9.1% of all cases respectively. This result reveal that EST-L is safe and effective therapeutic procedures for choledocholithiasis. We would recommend EST-L is adopted as an initial measure to remove common bile duct stones.     

Endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) with removal of common bile duct stones

Endoscopic papillotomy with removal of common bile duct stones was successfully performed in 14 patients. In 11 patients stones were found after cholecystectomy. In the remaining 3 patients there was a high operative risk. No serious complications occurred. Consequently the removal of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic papillotomy is an alternative to traditional treatment.     

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of pancreatic and biliary disease

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a new and valuable technique in the diagnosis of jaundice, pancreatic disease and obscure upper abdominal pain. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the sphincter of Oddi and the extraction of stones from the common bile duct are an extension of this procedure already in use in several high-volume centres. Cannulation of the bile ducts and pancreatic ducts in tests of secretion and cytology will become increasingly common applications of the technique. In order to provide dependability and cost-effectiveness, specialists in this procedure must maintain a high volume, necessarily limiting it to a few practitioners. Use of a trained endoscopic technician, a radiologist trained in endoscopy, or an endoscopist trained in fluoroscopy and spot-filming may decrease the manpower costs of this procedure.     

Laparo-endoscopic "rendezvous": a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stone clearance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy may fail due to difficulties in cannulating the papilla major. In this study we propose a new technique that facilitates the cannulation of the papilla and the common bile duct stone clearance during a standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Its clearance percentage, complication rate and post-operative stay have been evaluated and compared with standardized procedures such as open surgery and endoscopic sphincterotomy before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODOLOGY: In a group of 16 patients presenting with cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones or papillitis, the sphincterotome was driven across the papilla into the choledochus by a Dormia basket passed in the duodenum through the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Measures of outcome were clearance rate, mortality, morbidity and hospital stay. Furthermore, data obtained from this sample of patients were compared with those from another two groups of 16 patients in which choledocholithiasis was managed either by endoscopic sphincterotomy performed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy or by open cholecystectomy and trans-duodenal sphincterotomy. RESULTS: The rate of cannulation of the papilla and of the common bile duct stone clearance was 100% when the combined endo-laparoscopic approach was used in 15 patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy (93,7%) and in 15 patients with open sphincterotomy (93,7%), cholecystectomy was successful in every case. The groups were statistically similar with regard to complications; none of the patients required blood transfusion. The mean post operative stay was 95.2 hours (range 48-240) for the first group, 350.1 hours (range 192-1680) for the second and 69.7 hours (range 24-132) for the third. CONCLUSION: The laparo-endoscopic rendezvous, though still in evolution, is an efficacious method which can be used during the laparoscopic strategy of common bile duct clearance.     

Percutaneous transhepatic lithotripsy using a choledochoscope: long-term follow-up in 14 patients

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to estimate the long-term prognosis of patients with bile duct stones who undergo electrohydraulic lithotripsy guided by choledochoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Since 1987, at our institution, 14 patients with bile duct stones have been treated using percutaneous electrohydraulic lithotripsy guided by choledochoscopy. The procedure was performed 5-7 days after biliary drainage using a 5-mm choledochoscope placed through an 18- to 20-French sheath. All patients underwent follow-up CT, sonography, or both every 6-12 months after treatment. RESULTS: No complications occurred in the 14 patients who underwent treatment. During a mean follow-up period of 4.8 years (range, 2-9 years), two (14%) of the 14 patients developed recurrent common bile duct stones, and another two (14%) developed recurrent small intrahepatic stones; all patients remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous electrohydraulic lithotripsy can be safely performed using a 5-mm choledochoscope. Recurrent calculi may be seen in 28% of patients.     

15 years of endoscopic therapy in choledocholithiasis

INTRODUCTION: The relevance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones has increased since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1989-1990. METHODS: The number, indications, success and complication rate of ERCP were analyzed retrospectively in 1121 consecutive patients with bile duct stones treated at Berne University Hospital between 1980 and 1994. RESULTS: The number of patients undergoing endoscopic stone extraction increased slowly from 1980 to 1990, but has shown a 4-fold increase in the last 5 years parallel to the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Failure to diagnose and remove bile duct stones decreased 5-fold from 23% (14 of 60 patients) in 1986 to 4.4% (10 of 225 patients) in 1994. Major complications occurred in 3.2% (30 of 617 patients) and consisted of acute pancreatitis (1.6%), hemorrhage of the papilla (1%), and cholangitis (0.6%). The severity but not the number of complications has decreased in the last 15 years. CONCLUSION: Gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones are usually treated by endoscopic stone extraction combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Open operation with bile duct exploration is reserved for a small subgroup of patients with specific problems.