Conversion from +Sandimmune to Neoral in kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine and ketoconazole

BACKGROUND: Microemulsion cyclosporine is a new pharmaceutical form whose intestinal absorption is more constant, resulting in a better bioavailability. AIM: To assess dose adjustments and variability of blood levels after the conversion of cyclosporine to microemulsion cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients function receiving cyclosporine-ketoconazole. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty four patients with more than one year after the transplantation, with stable renal function and receiving triple immunosuppression were studied. Conventional cyclosporine was changed to the microemulsion form maintaining the same daily dose. Drug serum levels, serum creatinine and blood pressure were measured within two to eight months after the conversion. Doses of microemulsion cyclosporine were adjusted to achieve serum levels of 150 +/- 40 ng/ml. RESULTS: Microemulsion cyclosporine induced a slight initial increase in blood cyclosporine levels. Afterwards, levels were more stable than with conventional cyclosporine (165-185 and 145-210 ng/ml respectively) and the dispersion of values were lower (standard deviations of 70 and 100 ng/ml respectively). Twenty three patients did not require dose adjustments, in four it was reduced and in five it was increased. There were no changes in serum creatinine or blood pressure after the conversion. CONCLUSION: More stable serum levels without adverse reactions were obtained with microemulsion cyclosporine. Doses of cyclosporine need not to be changed during the conversion.     

Compliance with cyclosporine in adolescent renal transplant recipients

The percentage of non-tasters for phenylthiocarbamide in 915 Japanese students was 9.4%. The thresholds of the edge and back of the tongue to quinine hydrochloride were significantly smaller in the non-tasters than in the tasters. The thresholds of any tongue portions to NaCl, acetic acid or sucrose did not differ between the tasters and the non-tasters.     

A randomized controlled trial of verapamil on cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in heart and lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CsA) is a potent immunosuppressive drug widely used in organ transplantation and in the treatment of autoimmune diseases (1, 2). However, its common nephrotoxic effect is a major limiting factor. Short-term CsA treatment has been shown to cause reversible renal vasoconstriction, whereas long-term treatment can lead to an afferent arteriolopathy and chronic renal failure. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial to examine the short-term renal effects of verapamil in 32 CsA-treated heart or lung transplant recipients. Sixteen patients each were randomized to receive a 6-week course of verapamil or control treatment (atenolol in hypertensive patients and placebo in normotensive patients) 1-2 months after transplantation. An 8-hr sequential clearance study of inulin and p-aminohippuric acid for estimating glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow, respectively, was performed at baseline and at completion of study. The integral area under the curve of the clearance parameter over 8 hr was then calculated to generate a clearance-time index. RESULTS: There was no difference in the clearance-time indices for inulin and p-aminohippuric acid between the two groups at baseline. However, at the completion of study, the within-group change in the glomerular filtration rate clearance-time index was different between the verapamil and control groups (48+/-20 vs. -35+/-17 ml/min/1.73 m2 x hr, respectively; P=0.0038). A similar trend was seen for renal plasma flow, but did not reach statistical significance. Mean arterial blood pressure and whole-blood CsA levels did not differ between the two groups during the study. Verapamil treatment was also associated with a decrease in CsA dose requirement (7.6+/-0.58 mg/kg/day at baseline vs. 4.6+/-0.40 mg/kg/day at completion; P<0.001) without any significant change in trough whole blood CsA levels. Rejection episodes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of verapamil in the heart or lung transplant recipients may therefore provide both renal protective effects and cost savings.     

Long-term renal function in heart transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine therapy

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression with cyclosporine has improved allograft function and reduced both morbidity and mortality in organ transplantation. However, cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity still is a concern. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effects of cyclosporine on renal function in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who received transplants from 1985 to 1991 and had at least three yearly glomerular filtration rate measurements posttransplantation by 125I-iothalamate clearance method were included in the study. In addition, serum creatinine (before and after transplantation) and cyclosporine doses were analyzed. RESULTS: Maintenance immunosuppression at 1 year consisted of prednisone (0.1 mg/kg/day), azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day), and cyclosporine (12-hour trough level 100 to 150 ng/ml by fluorescence polarization immunoassay). The mean serum creatinine at 1 year was significantly higher than the mean pretransplantation serum creatinine (1.51 +/- 0.32 versus 1.28 +/- 0.38, p < 0.05) and stabilized after the first year. The mean glomerular filtration rate by 125I-iothalamate clearance method was 70.6 +/- 20.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 32 to 105) at 1 year and remained relatively stable during the follow-up period of up to 7 years. Creatinine clearance calculated by the Cockcroft and Gault formula overestimated the true glomerular filtration rate after the third year. The mean cyclosporine dosage was significantly lower after the first-year dose of 3.9 +/- 1.8 mg/kg/day (p < 0.05). Three patients in 39 started hemodialysis at 5, 7, and 10 years after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the adequacy of renal function is preserved with long-term cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients.     

Comparison of Neoral and Sandimmun cyclosporin A pharmacokinetic profiles in young renal transplant recipients

A major factor influencing whole blood cyclosporin A levels in young children with renal transplants is the variable absorption of Sandimmun (SIM). Neoral (NEO) is a new microemulsion of cyclosporin A (CYA) that has been reported to have better absorption characteristics. We compared the pharmacokinetics of SIM and NEO in nine renal transplant recipients aged less than 11 years (range 4.8-10.9 years) and observed clinical parameters during 6 months of NEO therapy. Median CYA dosage was 149 mg/m2 per day (range 98-226). We observed an increase in the maximum CYA concentration (Cmax) of 114%, an increase in area under the curve (AUC) of 71% and the time to reach Cmax was reduced from 1.75 h to 1.25 h with NEO, while 12-h trough levels (C12 h) did not change significantly. AUC correlated with C12 h for SIM (r2 = 0.833) and NEO (r2 = 0.699) and also C1.5 h for NEO (r2 = 0.775). During 24 weeks' follow-up, the coefficient of variation of CYA levels was lower for NEO (13%) than for SIM (20%). Although CYA dosages at the start and the end of 6 months on NEO were similar, only one patient was maintained on a constant dose. Four patients had acute reversible rises in plasma creatinine which responded to a 11% reduction in NEO dose; their increase in AUC was greater than those patients not showing a rise in plasma creatinine. Overall, median plasma creatinine was unchanged at the end of the study. NEO was well tolerated by the patients; temporary nausea and headache were experienced by three patients and one of them stopped NEO after 20 days. Other biochemical parameters were not significantly different on NEO.