Oral doxifluridine plus levoleucovorin in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND: There currently is no agreement regarding the appropriate treatment of elderly patients with advanced breast carcinoma (ABC). Doxifluridine (5-dFUR), a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, has been found to be effective in this entity, but its use is limited by neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity that are not observed when the oral formulation is used. The objective of this Phase II trial was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of oral 5-dFUR, biomodulated with levoleucovorin (1-leucovorin), in elderly patients (age > 70 years) with ABC. METHODS: 5-dFUR was administered orally at 600 mg/m2 twice daily for 4 consecutive days every 12 days, and oral 1-leucovorin was administered as 25 mg 2 hours before each 5-dFUR administration. Response was assessed every five cycles according to the World Health Organization criteria. In the presence of response or stable disease, the patients were treated for a maximum of 15 cycles. RESULTS: Seventy-three eligible patients were enrolled, 27 of whom had been pretreated with chemotherapy and/or hormonotherapy; all were assessable for response and toxicity after a median follow-up of 15 months. The objective response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval, 17.4-45.4). Regression predominantly occurred in the presence of soft tissue involvement (skin, lymph nodes, and breast). The median time to response was 2 months (range, 1-2 months) and the median response duration was 7 months (range, 2-17+ months). The median survival was 24 months (range, 2-42+ months). The treatment was very well tolerated, and the side effects were manageable and always reversible. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study show that 5-dFUR plus 1-leucovorin, both given orally, are associated with excellent patient compliance. Although the results are suboptimal in terms of an objective response, this characteristic could allow 5-dFUR to be used in elderly patients considered unsuitable for "aggressive" chemotherapy.     

Klinefelter syndrome

BACKGROUND: To determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and therapeutic activity of MTHF-modulated FU using two different administration schedules of the antimetabolite (bolus vs. two-hour infusion), the present randomized study using a 'pick-the-winner' design was undertaken in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with previously untreated advanced measurable colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with MTHF (100 mg/m2 days 1-5 i.v. bolus) plus FU (400 mg/m2 days 1-5) given either as i.v. bolus injection or as a two-hour infusion every four weeks. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, defined as > or = WHO grade 3 hematotoxicity and/or > or = WHO grade 2 nonhematologic side effects) and evidence of progressive disease, the FU dose was escalated by 50 mg/m2/day during each subsequent cycle until the individual maximum tolerable dose (MTD) was reached. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomized to the FU bolus arm and 42 patients to the FU two-hour infusion arm. The median MTD was 475 mg/m2/day (95% CI: 450-500) in the FU bolus arm with stomatitis +/- diarrhea being the most common DLT. Gastrointestinal side effects were also dose-limiting in the two-hour infusion arm; however, the median MTD was 600 mg/m2/day (95% CI: 568-632). Myelosuppression was more pronounced in the FU bolus arm than in the two-hour infusion arm. The overall response rates were 27.5% (95% CI: 15-44%; 1 CR and 10 PR) for patients treated in the bolus arm and 14.5% (95% CI: 5-28%; 1 CR and 5 PR) for those treated in the two-hour infusion arm. Analogous to recorded response, median time to progression (8.5 vs. 6.25) and overall survival time (14.0 vs. 11.0) tended to be superior in the FU bolus arm. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences in tolerable drug dose and toxicity between the two treatment arms might be explained by the administration schedule-dependent clinical pharmacokinetics of FU and/or the difference in extent of biochemical modulation of the antimetabolite through MTHF. The fact that the two regimens were not equitoxic probably also helps to explain the favourable response activity noted in the MTHF/FU bolus arm. Whether MTHF is as effective as leucovorin for biochemical modulation of FU remains to be determined in a randomized trial, for which we would recommend its combined use with bolus FU ('winner arm') using a starting dose of 400 mg/m2/day x5.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in women with advanced breast cancer: an active regimen with limiting neurotoxicity

PURPOSE: A phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer was performed to determine the objective response rate and make further observations about the toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the breast with no more than one chemotherapeutic treatment for advanced disease. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 administered as a 24-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. Patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously on day 3 until WBC recovery. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients continued to receive therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four patients entered the trial. Forty-two patients were assessable for response. Nineteen patients (43%) had no prior chemotherapy and 41 had no chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The median number of cycles administered per patient was five (range, one to seven). There were five complete responses (CRs) (11.9%) and 17 partial responses (PRs) (40.5%), with an overall response rate of 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.4% to 68.0%). Nine patients had stage III disease. The response rate for this group was 66.7% (95% CI, 33.0% to 92.5%), with three CRs and three PRs. Among 35 patients with stage IV disease, there were two CRs and 14 PRs, with an overall response rate of 48.5% (95% CI, 30.8% to 66.5%). Overall, the median response duration was 10.6 months. Thirty patients (68%) developed transient grade 4 neutropenia. Cumulative neuropathy was the major dose-limiting toxicity. After five cycles of chemotherapy, 96% of patients had at least grade 1 neurotoxicity and 52% had at least grade 2 neurotoxicity. One patient had a toxic death after cycle 1 of therapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for women with advanced breast cancer is an active regimen. However, the cumulative neurotoxicity was significant and dose-limiting in the majority of patients.     

Increased levels of proteoglycan fragments and stromelysin in hip joint fluid in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

High response rates in patients with metastatic melanoma have been achieved with combination chemoimmunotherapy. A response rate of 62% in 45 patients has been reported for treatment with dacarbazine, bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine (BOLD) plus interferon alpha (IFN-alpha). We conducted a multicentre phase II study to confirm these results. Melanoma patients with distant metastases were treated as outpatients with dacarbazine 200 mg m(-2) on days 1-5, vincristine 1 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 4, bleomycin 15 mg on days 2 and 5 i.v. and lomustine 80 mg orally on day 1, repeated every 4 weeks. IFN-alpha-2b was initiated s.c. on day 8 at 3 MU daily for 6 weeks, and 6 MU t.i.w. thereafter. Forty-three patients entered the study. The median number of metastatic sites was three (range 1-5), and 81% of patients had visceral metastases. Nine patients had brain metastases, and seven patients were systemically pretreated. Among the 41 patients that were evaluable for response, the response rate was 27% (95% CI 14-3%), with one complete and ten partial remissions. The response rate in 25 previously untreated patients without brain metastases was 40% (95% CI 21-61%). Median duration of response was 6 (range 2-14+) months; median overall survival was 5 (1-26) months. The main toxicity was malaise/fatigue. We confirm that BOLD plus IFN-alpha has activity in metastatic melanoma. The lower response rate in our study compared with the previous report is probably related to patient selection, as in the previous study 46% of patients had stage III disease, whereas all our patients had stage IV disease, which is associated with a worse prognosis.     

Corticosteroids significantly delay the onset of docetaxel-induced fluid retention: final results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Investigational Drug Branch for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: To confirm the efficacy of docetaxel in patients with breast cancer previously treated with one chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic disease and to compare the incidence of fluid retention (FR) and skin toxicity when docetaxel is administered with and without prophylactic corticosteroids. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-three patients, pretreated with one chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with bidimensionally measurable and progressive disease, were eligible for this randomized trial. Docetaxel with prophylactic oral antihistamine was administered at a dose of 50 mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 8 every 21 days and patients were randomized to receive methylprednisolone (40 mg days -1, 0, 1, 7, 8, and 9 of each cycle) (arm A) or no methylprednisolone (arm B). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (34%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 23% to 45%) achieved on objective response. The median time to disease progression and median overall survival time were 5 and 13.5 months, respectively. In total, 415 cycles of docetaxel were administered (arm A: N = 219, median = six; arm B: N = 196, median = five). The most common toxicity observed was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 79% of patients. Clinically significant nonhematologic side effects included skin reactions and asthenia. In an intent-to-treat analysis, patients who received methylprednisolone premedication had a delayed onset of FR (median time to onset of FR: arm A, 84 days; arm B, 62 days; P = .01) and received a higher median cumulative dose of docetaxel before the onset of FR (arm A, 333 mg/m2; arm B, 215 mg/m2; P = .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of skin toxicity between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel, at this dose and schedule, has definite antitumor activity in pretreated MBC patients. Moreover, this is the first randomized trial to show that corticosteroids have a favorable impact on docetaxel-induced FR.     

A therapeutic trial of acupuncture in neurogenic bladder of spinal cord injured patients--a preliminary report

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study was conducted on an in-clinic basis to assess forearm perfusion after subcutaneous (s.c.) naratriptan and placebo by reserve volume (hyperemic/baseline) and basal forearm blood flow (FBF) measured by strain gauge plethysmography. Nineteen male and female volunteer migraine subjects (International Headache Society criteria) received s.c. naratriptan 1 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, and placebo on four separate study days outside a migraine attack. FBF was recorded at baseline, at 7-min intervals post-dose up to 1 h (basal) and once after sublingual glyceryl trinitrate administered at 1 h (hyperemic). Vital signs and electrocardiograms were recorded at baseline and 15, 30, 45, and 60 min post-dose. There were no statistically significant differences in reserve volume (hyperemic/baseline) between any dose of s.c. naratriptan and placebo. The naratriptan to placebo ratio was 102% (95% CI: 87-120%; p = 0.789) for 1 mg; 97% (95% CI: 83-114%, p = 0.737) for 5 mg; and 92% (95% CI: 79-108%; p = 0.325) for 10 mg. There were no statistically significant differences in basal FBF for any dose compared to placebo. The naratriptan to placebo ratio was 95% (95% CI: 87-104%; p = 0.263) for 1 mg; 94% (95% CI: 86-102%; p = 0.142) for 5 mg; and 94% (95% CI: 86-103%; p = 0.157) for 10 mg. The percentage of patients reporting adverse events was 53% with placebo, 53% with s.c. naratriptan 1 mg, 89% with 5 mg and 89% with 10 mg. In conclusion, these results suggest that s.c. naratriptan doses similar to and above the oral therapeutic dose equivalent (single oral dose 2.5 mg) have no significant effect on peripheral blood flow as measured by FBF. S.c. naratriptan doses 1 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg were well tolerated.     

Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE: To determine the relative efficacy of an intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) adjuvant chemotherapy regimen compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 or cyclophosphomide 75 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Each cycle was administered monthly for 6 months. Patients administered CEF received antibiotic prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole two tablets twice a day for the duration of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59 months. One hundred sixty-nine of the 359 CMF patients developed recurrence compared with 132 of the 351 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 53% and 63%, respectively (P = .009). One hundred seven CMF patients died compared with 85 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year actuarial survival rates were 70% and 77%, respectively (P = .03). The rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia was 1.1% in the CMF group compared with 8.5% in the CEF group. There was one case of congestive heart failure in a patient who received CMF compared with none in the CEF group. Acute leukemia occurred in five patients in the CEF group. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial show the superiority of CEF over CMF in terms of both disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer.     

A combination of ifosfamide and mitoxantrone as salvage therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Ifosfamide (IFX) and mitoxantrone (MXN) have been found to be effective against advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The combination of these two agents has not yet been tested in this setting but seems to be rational, given the different action mechanisms of these drugs and their not completely overlapping side effects. Between June 1987 and November 1991, 37 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma recurrent or refractory to primary cisplatin-based chemotherapy entered the study. Therapy consisted of MXN, given i.v. at 10 mg/m2 on day 1 and IFX given i.v. at 2,000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-3 with mesna. The cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Four patients achieved a complete remission and three achieved a partial remission, for response rates of 18.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3-31.5%] in the whole sample and 38.8% (95% CI 16.3-61.3%) in the subset of 18 patients responding to first-line cisplatin. No response was obtained in the remaining patients, whose disease was refractory to primary platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinically significant toxicity (WHO grades 3-4) included leukopenia in 46% of the patients and anemia in 32.5%. The non-hematologic toxicity was mild, except for reversible alopecia (57%) and nausea and vomiting (48.5%). This regimen seems attractive for patients who have either failed or not received platinum retreatment, especially when limiting neurotoxicity occurs. Further studies are warranted to establish the relative impact of both of these agents.     

Enterogastric bile reflux during technetium-99m-sestamibi cardiac imaging

Twenty-six patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix were treated with i.v. paclitaxel, 250 mg/m2 over 3 h every 21 days. They received steroid, H1 and H2 blocker premedications, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support (5 microgram/kg/day). No prior chemotherapy, except as a radiation sensitizer, was allowed. The median age was 50 (range, 36-81) years, and performance status Zubrod was 1 (range, 0-2). Eight (33%) patients had prior surgery, and 22 (92%) had prior radiation therapy. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for response; 2 were later found to be ineligible. Five patients had partial responses (21%; 95% confidence interval, 6-40%), and 14 (58%; 95% confidence interval, 35-78%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 10 (range, 3-27+) weeks. The responses were within the radiation port (four responses) and outside of it (one response). The median interval from the start of irradiation to the start of paclitaxel in responding patients was 94 weeks, whereas in patients with stable disease it was 68 weeks, and in patients whose disease progressed it was 46 weeks. Eighty-eight percent of the 105 cycles of paclitaxel were administered at a dose of 250 mg/m2 or higher. Granulocytopenia was brief and noncumulative, with grades 3 and 4 experienced by 5 and 3 patients, respectively. G-CSF was used for a median of 7 (range, 2-14) days/cycle. Anemia was mild, with G3 noted in 3 patients, and thrombocytopenia was not significant. Infections and musculoskeletal pain were mild and infrequent. Sensory (14 patients G1 or G2 and 2 patients G3) and motor (4 patients G1 or G2 and 1 patient G3) neurotoxicity was noted. There was no significant cardiovascular toxicity. Paclitaxel is active in patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix and is well tolerated at this dose schedule with G-CSF support.     

Randomized phase II study of two schedules of topotecan in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study

PURPOSE: As topotecan is S-phase-specific, its efficacy is likely schedule-dependent. Therefore, a randomized study using a "pick the winner" design was undertaken to compare two schedules in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with no more than two separate regimens of chemotherapy, one of which had to be platinum-containing, were randomized to either topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) over 30 minutes daily for 5 days repeated every 21 days (arm A, the standard arm), or topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion once a week for 4 weeks repeated every 6 weeks (arm B, the experimental arm). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were eligible and 63 were assessable for response. The response rate in arm A was 22.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6% to 41.2%), which was significantly superior to that in arm B, 3.1% (95% CI, 0.1% to 16%) (P = .026). The regimens were not equitoxic, with 94% of patients on arm A experiencing grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia as opposed to 52% on arm B. CONCLUSION: The weekly 24 hour infusion of topotecan at 1.75 mg/m2 was ineffective in relapsed ovarian cancer. The daily-times-five schedule remains the schedule of choice. As the regimens were not equitoxic, one cannot differentiate between an ineffective schedule and an ineffective dose as the reason for the differing response rates. However, the degree of myelotoxicity that already occurs will preclude any substantially higher dosing with the weekly regimen.     

Randomized comparison of etoposide pharmacokinetics after oral etoposide phosphate and oral etoposide

Etoposide phosphate is a water-soluble prodrug of etoposide. The plasma pharmacokinetics of etoposide following oral administration of etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide were compared. Seventeen patients with solid tumours were enrolled to receive oral etoposide phosphate 125 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 every 3 weeks, with escalation to 175 mg m(-2) from course 3 when possible. Patients were randomized to receive oral etoposide phosphate or oral etoposide on day 1 of course 1 and the alternative compound on day 1 of course 2. Fifteen patients received two or more courses and were evaluable for pharmacokinetic comparisons. The median AUC(inf) (area under the concentration vs time curve from zero to infinity) of etoposide was 77.7 mg l(-1) h after etoposide phosphate (95% CI 61.3-100.5) and 62.0 mg l(-1) h after oral etoposide (95% CI 52.2-76.9). The difference in favour of etoposide phosphate was borderline significant: median 9.9 mg l(-1) h (95% CI 0.1-32.8 mg l(-1) h; P = 0.05). However, the inter-patient variability of etoposide AUC(inf) was not improved (coefficients of variation 42.3% and 48.4%). Etoposide phosphate was undetectable in plasma after oral administration. Toxicities of oral etoposide phosphate were not different from those known for etoposide. In conclusion, oral etoposide phosphate does not offer a clinically relevant benefit over oral etoposide.     

Preliminary report of the activity of docetaxel in advanced or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the cervix

Eighteen patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix were treated with i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 over 1 h every 21 days. No patient received prior chemotherapy, except as a radiation sensitizer. Median age was 42 years (range 30-58) and Zubrod performance status was 1 (0-2). Ten (59%) patients had prior surgery and 11 (65%) had prior radiation therapy. Sixteen patients were evaluable for response. Two patients had a partial response (13%; 95% CI 0-32%) and eight (50%; 95% CI 23-77%) had stable disease. Dose reduction to 75 mg/m2 was required in 10 patients and to 55 mg/m2 in one patient. Granulocytopenia was the major hematopoietic toxicity (31% grade 3 and 44% grade 4). Docetaxel is active in patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix and may be tolerable at this dose schedule.     

Bioavailability of repaglinide, a novel antidiabetic agent, administered orally in tablet or solution form or intravenously in healthy male volunteers

OBJECTIVE: Repaglinide is a novel prandial glucose regulator (PGR) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In order to investigate subject variability following oral administration of repaglinide, and to determine the relative and absolute bioavailabilities of repaglinide following oral or intravenous administration, two single-centre, open-label, randomized, crossover clinical studies were conducted. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Study 1 was conducted in 24 healthy male subjects (aged 18 to 49 years), who received repaglinide 2 mg, as either tablet or oral solution, twice each on 4 separate occasions at least 7 days apart. Study 2 was conducted in 12 healthy male subjects (aged 18 to 45 years), who received repaglinide 2 mg, either as a tablet or as an intravenous infusion over 15 minutes, once each on 2 separate occasions, with a washout period of 7-10 days. RESULTS: In study 1 there was no significant difference between administration of repaglinide 2 mg, in either tablet or oral solution form with regard to intrasubject variation in AUC and Cmax. However, the intrasubject variation in t(max) and mean residence time (MRT) was significantly (p = 0.001) larger for the tablets than for the oral solution. Intersubject variation (CV) in AUC ranged from 44.7% to 62.1% after oral administration. The relative bioavailability of repaglinide (AUC(tablet)/AUC(oral solution)) was 110% (95% CI, 103%-117%). In study 2 the absolute bioavailability of repaglinide administered as a tablet was 62.5% (95% CI, 49.2%-79.5%) relative to an intravenous infusion of the same dose. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence from either study that the tablet formulation led to greater variation in serum profiles of repaglinide. It was concluded that repaglinide is rapidly absorbed and eliminated in healthy subjects when administered orally or intravenously under fasting conditions, and that the total availability of repaglinide is similar in the tablet and oral solution formulations, though that the rate of absorption is slower for the tablet formulation.     

Pantoprazole has no influence on steady state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metoprolol in healthy volunteers

The new H+/K+ ATPase inhibitor pantoprazole, a substituted benzimidazole, is metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes 2C19 or 3A4 and subsequently undergoes phase II metabolism. The widely used beta 1-adrenoreceptor-blocking agent metoprolol is metabolized via CYP2D6. The influence of pantoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of an orally administered zero order kinetics formulation (ZOK) of metoprolol was the objective of this study. Eighteen volunteers (9 female, 9 male, age 20-44 years) completed the randomized, double-blind crossover study. Each subject received either 95 mg metoprolol and placebo (reference (R)) or 95 mg metoprolol and 40 mg pantoprazole (test (T)) as oral doses (sid) for 5 consecutive days. On day 5 of each period serum concentrations of R- and S-metoprolol were determined and a treadmill ergometry was performed. The primary pharmacokinetic characteristics for extent and rate of absorption were AUC(0-24h) and % PTF, respectively. To assess the pharmacodynamic effect of metoprolol the excess area under the effect vs. time curve was calculated for heart rate during ergometry (AUCexHR). Point estimate and 90% confidence limits (CI) for the ratios of population medians of T and R were given. The respective point estimates (90% CI) of the ratios of both primary and secondary characteristics were entirely within the equivalence range of 0.80 and 1.25 for both enantiomers of metoprolol. Moreover, equivalence could be shown for the pharmacodynamic characteristic AUCexHR. Hence, it was concluded that pantoprazole does not interact with metoprolol pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. Therefore, no dose adjustment of metoprolol during therapy with pantoprazole is necessary.     

A lymphoma cell line resistant to 4-piperidinopiperidine was less sensitive to CPT-11

The purpose of the study was to assess the toxicity and efficacy of an oral, combination antiemetic regimen including granisetron (Kytril; SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA) in the setting of highly emetogenic conditioning chemotherapy for stem cell transplantation. Antiemetic prophylaxis consisted of oral granisetron 2 mg once daily, oral prochlorperazine 10 mg q 6 h and oral dexamethasone 4 mg q 6 h, beginning 1 h prior to chemotherapy on each of the 4 days of chemotherapy and continuing until 24 h after the completion of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Patients received either CVP (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, VP-16 1800 mg/m2 and carboplatin 1200 mg/m2) or CTP (thiotepa 500 mg/m2 in place of VP-16) in four daily doses given over 4 h from days -4 to -1. Previously mobilized and cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were reinfused on day +1. Evaluation of nausea, emetic episodes (EE), adverse events, and rescue medications were recorded on a daily patient diary. Thirty-six patients were entered. Fifty-three percent (95% CI = 37-75%) of patients achieved complete response for emesis (CR = 0 EE/24 h) and 75% (95% CI = 58-90%) had combined complete and major response (CR+MR = 0-3 EE/24 h) during all 5 of the treatment days. During the 5 study days, the average number of patient-days with no emesis was 3.7 (74%) and with 1-3 EE was 4.3 (86%). On days -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0, the combined CR+MR rate for emesis was 97, 92, 86, 78 and 75%, respectively. Nausea was absent or mild on all 5 study days in 57% (95% CI = 37-75%). Eight patients had severe late-onset emesis occurring on days +1 to +3 after reinfusion of stem cells. No clinically significant toxicities attributable to the antiemetic regimen were observed. An all oral antiemetic regimen of granisetron, prochlorperazine and dexamethasone appears to be safe and highly effective in patients receiving multiple, daily, high-dose chemotherapy regimens. This regimen offers the advantage of cost-savings, a low side-effect profile and ease of administration in the predominately outpatient setting of HDC with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT).     

Carboplatin-oral etoposide personalized dosing in elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients. Gruppo Oncologico Cooperativo Sud-Italia

The toxicity and therapeutic activity, including the effect on quality of life, of the carboplatin-oral etoposide combination, given with an intrapatient dose escalation, was tested in 38 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged over 70 years, and in 8 younger patients with a performance status of 2. In the absence of grade 3-4 toxicity, doses were escalated as follows: first course (carboplatin AUC 4; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-14); second course (carboplatin AUC 5; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-14); third course (carboplatin AUC 5; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-21). A total of 141 chemotherapy cycles were delivered. The treatment was, in general, well tolerated and no toxic deaths occurred. More than 60% of patients received 100% of the planned dose intensity. Transient grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 and 2 patients, respectively, but only 2 patients had to be hospitalised because of fever. All patients were evaluated for activity on an 'intention to treat basis'. Ten partial responses and 20 stable disease were recorded, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 11-36). 9/38 (24%; 95% CI = 12-41) elderly patients obtained a partial response. The median response duration was 4 months. A quality of life improvement was observed in 19 of the 46 enrolled patients (41%; 95% CI = 27-57), and 15/46 (33%; 95% CI = 19-48) showed a performance status improvement. The quality of life score improved in 17/38 (45%) elderly patients. 8/10 responders and 11/20 patients with stable disease showed a concomitant improvement in quality of life. At a median potential follow-up of 16 months (range 2-21), 31 patients had had progression of disease and 23 had died, for a median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of 5 and 10 months, respectively. The median survival time was 11 months in the elderly patients. The median time to subjective impairment (TSI) was 6 months (7 months in the elderly group). One-year estimated TTP, TSI and OS rates were 22, 29 and 41%, respectively. At multivariate Cox analysis, a > 25% improvement in the quality of life score was more predictive of a better survival outcome than the response achievement.     

One-stage reconstruction of post-electrical burn forearm and hand defects using microsurgical transfer of an ulnar neuromyotendinocutaneous unit

Epirubicin is known to be metabolized in the liver. Therefore, drugs such as cimetidine, which inhibit the cytochrome P-450 enzyme system or reduce liver blood flow, may reduce the plasma clearance of epirubicin. In a small study, epirubicin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was administered intravenously to eight patients, who also received oral cimetidine (400 mg b.d. for 7 days starting 5 days before chemotherapy) with either the first or second cycles. Epirubicin pharmacokinetics and liver blood flow (idocyanine green clearance) were assessed at each course. The areas under the plasma concentration time curves (AUCs) were used to compare the systemic exposure to epirubicin and its metabolites with each course. The estimated median percentage increase (95% confidence interval CI) in the AUC with cimetidine were: epirubicin 50% (95% CI -18 to 193, epirubicinol 41% (95% CI 1 to 92). Despite the small numbers studied, the increase in the active metabolite epirubicinol was significant (P < 0.05). These changes in exposure were not explained by reduced cytochrome P-450 activity as the 7-deoxy-doxorubicinol aglycone AUC was not reduced (357% increase: 95% CI 17 to 719) or by a decrease in liver blood flow (17% increase: 95% CI -39 to 104). Cimetidine is likely to be coprescribed or self-administered with epirubicin and therefore clinicians should be aware of this potential interaction.     

Specialty maldistribution. The next nursing crisis?

80 patients with previously untreated stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy (CT) alone (arm I: 26 patients) or the same CT combined with either interferon (IFN)-gamma (arm II: 27 patients) or with both IFN-gamma and IFN-alpha (arm III: 27 patients). The CT comprised cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 3 and 5, once every 28 days; the IFN therapy comprised either recombinant IFN-gamma 1b 0.2 mg/m2, subcutaneously, three times a week until day 25, or recombinant IFN-alpha 2c 6 x 10(6) U given according to the same schedule, and simultaneously with IFN-gamma. A maximum of six cycles were given. The treatment was discontinued if progressive disease (PD) was demonstrated. The mean numbers of cycles per patient given in the different arms were 3.6 (arm I), 3.0 (arm II) and 2.9 (arm III). The main reason for discontinuation in all arms was PD. 17 (28%) of the 61 evaluable patients achieved partial responses (35% in arm I, 29% in arm II and 35% in arm III, non-significant). No complete response was recorded. Haematological toxicity was dose-limiting in all arms: leucopenia (WHO grade 3) was observed universally, but more frequently in arm III (in 18% of cycles given). Only two episodes of grade 4 leucopenia were seen (arms II and III) and six episodes of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (arm III). Median survival was 6-7 months in all arms. The survival curve for arm II was slightly more favourable (non-significant) than those for other arms. The addition of IFN-gamma alone or IFN-alpha plus IFN-gamma to platinum-based CT did not improve response rates nor did it produce any significant survival benefit for patients with NSCLC. Increased haematological toxicity was observed when both IFNs were administered concomitantly with CT.     

Impact of stenting on coronary angioplasty procedures

The efficacy and toxicity of chronic administration of oral etoposide was evaluated in 61 patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ten patients received previous chemotherapy, 15 received radiotherapy, and one received both treatments. Twenty-four patients had concurrent cardiac and/or pulmonary impairment, which precluded more intensive treatment. Etoposide was given orally, 100 mg daily for 7 consecutive days and consequently 100 mg every other day for 14 more days in a 28-day schedule. Partial response was observed in 17 patients (28%; 95% confidence interval, 17-39%) and stable disease in 21 (34%). The median duration of response was 6 months (range, 2-34 months). The median survival for responders was 22 months and that of nonresponders was 7 months (p < 0.001). The median survival for all patients was 9 months (range, 1-35 months; 95% confidence interval, 5.69-12.31%). Toxicity was acceptable. Other than alopecia, which was observed in all patients, myelotoxicity was the most common toxicity--particularly leukopenia, which was severe in nine patients. Other less common toxicities included nausea and vomiting, stomatitis, anorexia, and neurotoxicity and were mild. No treatment-related deaths were observed. In conclusion, the regimen was effective and well tolerated with significant survival benefit for the responders. It represents an interesting therapeutic approach, especially in the elderly.     

Ischemia/reperfusion injury in flow-through venous flaps

This study was designed to test the activity and feasibility of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) and cisplatin combination therapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Nineteen patients with inoperable and/or metastatic gastric cancer, which was histologically proven, were orally administered 5'-DFUR 1,200 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 and days 15-18 combined with 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin being repeated every 4 weeks. Five partial responses (PRs) were achieved. Seven patients had stable disease and 6 progressed on therapy. The overall response rate was 27.7% (95% confidence interval: 9.69% to 53.5%). The median survival duration of all 18 patients was 25 weeks (9-64). The majority of patients had WHO grade I/II toxicity, but there was no treatment-related death. These data support that the combinations of oral 5'-DFUR and cisplatin are well tolerable and have a moderate activity with low toxicity in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.