Comparison of propofol and pentazocine combined with thiamylal for laryngeal mask insertion

We evaluated the combination of pentazocine and thiamylal as induction agents for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion and compared this with propofol. Ninety-four patients, ASA grade 1 or 2, were randomly assigned to one of four induction groups as follows; group P: propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1, group p 0.3: pentazocine 0.3 mg.kg-1 followed by thiamylal 5 mg.kg-1, group p 0.6: pentazocine 0.6 mg.kg-1 followed by thiamylal 5 mg.kg-1, and group T: thiamylal 5 mg.kg-1. In group T (n = 5), insertion of LMA was impossible due to inadequate anesthesia. In contrast, good and acceptable conditions for LMA insertion were obtained in 85.2%, 86.7%, and 96.9% of group P, p 0.3, and p 0.6, respectively. Apneic interval, endtidal CO2 and arterial CO2 were significantly greater in pentazocine groups than in propofol group (group P < p 0.3 < p 0.6). Systolic pressure decreased after induction in all groups. Decreases in systolic and diastolic pressure were significantly greater in group P. Heart rate did not show any significant change. We conclude that the induction with the combination of pentazocine and thiamylal provides suitable conditions for LMA insertion with more stable hemodynamics compared with propofol. Doses of 0.3 mg.kg-1 seem to be desirable for LMA insertion.     

Influence of beta-endorphin on the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates by rabbit alveolar macrophages

We have compared the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), a modified Guedel airway device with a specially designed cuff at its distal end, with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), on haemodynamic and electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to insertion. In addition, we examined the haemodynamic and EEG changes during initiation of the effect-compartment controlled infusion. We studied 35 female patients undergoing ambulatory gynaecological surgery allocated randomly to received an LMA or COPA to manage the airway. After premedication with midazolam 0.03 mg kg-1 i.v. and low-dose alfentanil (0.01 mg kg-1), anaesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, using an effect-compartment controlled infusion set at an effect-site concentration of 4 micrograms ml-1. After intercompartmental equilibration, the LMA (group I) or COPA (group II) was inserted and haemodynamic (arterial pressure, heart rate) and EEG (bispectral index (BIS)) responses to insertion studied. The effect-compartment controlled infusion of propofol caused only mild haemodynamic changes during induction. Changes in arterial pressure and heart rate after insertion were similar in both groups and not significantly different from baseline values before insertion. Changes in BIS after insertion were minor and similar between groups.     

Upper airway reflexes during a combination of propofol and fentanyl anesthesia

BACKGROUND: The effects of intravenous anesthetics on airway protective reflexes have not been fully explored. The purpose of the present study was to characterize respiratory and laryngeal responses to laryngeal irritation during increasing doses of fentanyl under propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty-two female patients anesthetized with propofol and breathing through the laryngeal mask airway were randomly allocated to three groups: (1) eight patients who received cumulative total doses of 200 microg fentanyl given in the form of two doses of 50 microg and one dose of 100 microg spaced 6 min under mechanical controlled ventilation while end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) was maintained at 38 mmHg (fentanyl-controlled ventilation group), (2) eight patients who received cumulative total doses of 200 microg fentanyl while breathing spontaneously while end-tidal PCO2 was allowed to increase spontaneously (fentanyl-spontaneous ventilation group), and (3) six spontaneously breathing patients who were anesthetized with propofol alone (propofol group). The laryngeal mucosa of each patient was stimulated by spraying the cord with distilled water, and the evoked responses were assessed by analyzing the respiratory variables and endoscopic images. RESULTS: Before administration of fentanyl, laryngeal stimulation caused vigorous reflex responses, such as expiration reflex spasmodic panting, cough reflex, and apnea with laryngospasm. Increasing doses of fentanyl reduced the incidences of all these responses, except for apnea with laryngospasm, in a dose-related manner in both the fentanyl-controlled ventilation and the fentanyl-spontaneous ventilation groups. Detailed analysis of endoscopic images revealed several characteristics of laryngeal behavior during the airway reflex responses. CONCLUSION: Incremental doses of fentanyl depress airway reflex responses in a dose-related manner, except for apnea with laryngospasm.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA): initial experience in Singapore

We have evaluated the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) for ventilation and for blind tracheal intubation. After induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl 1 microgram kg-1 and propofol 3 ml kg-1, the ILMA was placed successfully on the first attempt in all 100 patients. After administration of atracurium 0.5 mg kg-1, blind tracheal intubation was successful in 97% of patients--50% on the first attempt, 42% on the second and 5% on the third. Success was improved by pulling the metal handle of the ILMA towards the intubator in an "extension" manoeuvre, if intubation was not possible on the first attempt. These findings confirm the effectiveness of the ILMA in an Asian population.     

The site of airway irritation during induction of anaesthesia

The aim of this investigation was to study the role of the nasal airway in mediating upper airway reflexes during induction of anaesthesia when the commonly used irritant inhalational anaesthetic agent enflurane is used. In a prospective randomised study, 40 ASA 1 & 2 day-case patients undergoing body surface surgery were recruited. Following intravenous induction using propofol, 20 patients received enflurane administered via a laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the anaesthetic vapour therefore bypassing the nasal airway. In the other group, 20 patients received enflurane anaesthesia administered using a face mask, the nasal airway therefore being exposed to inhalation anaesthetic. We were unable to demonstrate any significant (p < 0.05) differences between the two groups in relation to upper airway complications (cough, breath holding, laryngeal spasm, bronchospasm and excitement). Previous work has identified the nose as a possible important reflexogenic site for upper airway reflexes in humans during anaesthesia. We have been unable to demonstrate any difference in upper airway complications when the nasal airway was included or excluded from exposure to irritant anaesthetic vapours, when administered in a clinical setting.     

Fetal unilateral cleft lip and palate: detection of enzymic anomalies in the amniotic fluid

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation frequently results in an increase in respiratory system resistance that can be reversed by inhaled bronchodilators. The authors hypothesized that insertion of a laryngeal mask airway would be less likely to result in reversible bronchoconstriction than would insertion of an endotracheal tube. METHODS: Fifty-two (45 men, 7 women) patients were randomized to receive a 7.5-mm (women) or 8-mm (men) endotracheal tube or a No. 4 (women) or No. 5 (men) laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesia was induced with 2 microg/kg fentanyl and 5 mg/kg thiopental, and airway placement was facilitated with 1 mg/kg succinylcholine. When a seal to more than 20 cm water was verified, respiratory system resistance was measured immediately after airway placement. Inhalation anesthesia was begun with isoflurane to achieve an end-tidal concentration of 1% for 10 min. Respiratory system resistance was measured again during identical conditions. RESULTS: Among patients receiving laryngeal mask airways, the initial respiratory system resistance was significantly less than among patients with endotracheal tubes (9.2+/-3.3 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1) [mean +/- SD] compared with 13.4+/-9.6 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1); P < 0.05). After 10 min of isoflurane, the resistance decreased to 8.6+/-3.6 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1) in the endotracheal tube group but remained unchanged at 9.1+/-3.3 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1) in the laryngeal mask airway group. The decrease in respiratory system resistance in the endotracheal tube group of 4.7+/-7 cm water x 1(-1) x s(-1) was highly significant compared with the lack of change in the laryngeal mask airway group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Resistance decreased rapidly only in patients with endotracheal tubes after they received isoflurane, a potent bronchodilator, suggesting that reversible bronchoconstriction was present in patients with endotracheal tubes but not in those with laryngeal mask airways. A laryngeal mask airway is a better choice of airway to minimize airway reaction.     

Airway control during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: pilot study with the intubating laryngeal mask airway

Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy has become a common procedure for bedside insertion of tracheostomy tubes in the intensive care unit. Management of the airway during the procedure using the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and other methods has been described. The intubating laryngeal mask airway has several potential benefits for airway management during percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy compared with the LMA. These include the use of both the fibreoptic bronchoscope and tracheal tube if necessary. We report the results of a pilot study of 10 patients that illustrates these advantages.     

Laryngeal mask and reduction of nasal bone fractures

A retrospective study was conducted in 116 patients who underwent anesthesia for reduction of nasal fracture under laryngeal mask for ventilation and protection of the airways. One patient had secondary intubation due to difficult insertion of the laryngeal mask. No episode of hypoxemia related to blood inhalation occurred. The laryngeal mask may be proposed to maintain the airway in this surgical procedure.     

Prevalence of malaria in Dakar, Senegal. Comparative study of the plasmodial indices in pregnant and non-pregnant women

One hundred ASA I orthopaedic surgical patients (four randomized groups) were anaesthetized using continuous propofol and intermittent fentanyl (TIVA), with controlled ventilation via a tracheal tube in groups 1 and 2, and a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in groups 3 and 4. Neuromuscular blockers were used in groups 1 and 3 only. There were no significant differences between groups in total anaesthetic requirements, as assessed by cardiovascular variables and movement. Coughing interfered with surgery and made controlled ventilation difficult to manage. In contrast, movement not associated with coughing did not impair surgery or ventilation. Patients in group 2 (tracheal tube, no neuromuscular blocker) required more interventions for coughing than the other groups, while patients in group 4 (LMA, no neuromuscular blocker) needed more boluses for movement than groups 1 and 3. Groups 1 and 2 (tracheal tube) had significantly higher heart rates and mean arterial pressures than groups 3 and 4 for varying periods up to 5 min after insertion of the airway management device. There was no correlation between mean arterial pressure and plasma concentrations of catecholamines related to insertion of either the tracheal tube or LMA. The LMA was found to be a highly effective device for controlled ventilation in TIVA and easier to manage than the tracheal tube in the absence of neuromuscular blockers.     

The effects of general versus epidural anesthesia for outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Although many anesthetic techniques are described for immersion extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), regional and i.v. techniques are the most commonly reported. This randomized, prospective study compared general anesthesia (GA) and epidural anesthesia (EPID) with regard to effectiveness, side effects, induction time, and recovery in patients undergoing ESWL using an unmodified Dornier HM-3 lithotriptor. Twenty-six healthy outpatients were randomized to GA (propofol, N2O, laryngeal mask airway) or EPID (lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine). Intraoperative and postoperative supplemental medications, side effects, and complications were noted. Induction times and times required to meet standard recovery criteria were compared between groups. Patients were surveyed regarding their satisfaction with anesthesia. All patients in the EPID group had effective blocks with a single catheter insertion and local anesthetic injection. In the GA group, the LMA was inserted successfully in all patients. Time from room entry to procedure start was significantly less in the GA group (23 +/- 11 vs 34 +/- 9 min; P < 0.05). Patients in the GA group were ready for discharge home earlier (127 +/- 59 vs 178 +/- 49 min; P < 0.05). Only three patients experienced nausea (one in the GA group, two in the EPID group). There were no differences in patient or urologist satisfaction with anesthesia. We conclude that GA is associated with a rapid recovery compared with EPID. Implications: General anesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide, and a laryngeal mask airway is comparable to epidural anesthesia with lidocaine for outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy procedures. However, early recovery is more rapid after general anesthesia compared with epidural anesthesia.     

Nasal fibreoptic tracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients breathing via a modified laryngeal mask airway

A modified laryngeal mask airway was used to facilitate nasotracheal intubation with a fibreoptic laryngoscope. A size 4 laryngeal mask airway was modified by creating a defect at the base of the stem and removing the bars to allow passage of the fibreoptic laryngoscope from the nasopharynx to the larynx. The laryngeal mask airway cuff was split and the cut edges were sealed with silicone. This design allowed the cuff to function normally and allowed removal of the split laryngeal mask airway after the tracheal tube had been 'railroaded' into place. Thirty-four patients were studied. The split laryngeal mask airway was easily inserted with satisfactory airway maintenance in 32 patients. Nasal airway endoscopy and laryngoscopy were successfully achieved with the split laryngeal mask airway in place in 31 of 32 patients. Railroading the tracheal tube over the fibreoptic laryngoscope with the split laryngeal mask airway in place was successful in all 31 of these patients. This prototype split laryngeal mask airway allows good airway maintenance while fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation is performed.     

The glottic aperture seal airway: a new ventilatory device

BACKGROUND: None of the presently used airway devices are ideal regarding ease of insertion, alignment with the laryngeal inlet, and provision of a high-pressure seal from the environment. The purpose of this study was to determine, in awake volunteers, the performance of a new ventilatory device, the glottic aperture seal airway, regarding ease of insertion, alignment with the laryngeal inlet, and forced exhalation seal pressure (PFES). METHODS: The glottic aperture seal airway consists of a curved tubular component that ends in the middle of an elliptical foam cushion glottic component. The posterior surface of the foam has a curved flexible plastic backing, which imparts a 60 degree angle between the proximal half and the distal half of the foam cushion. When the glottic aperture seal airway is properly in situ in a supine patient, the proximal half of the foam cushion is opposite the laryngeal inlet. The posterior surface of the plastic backing has a balloon attached to it. Inflation of the balloon presses the ventilation hole and foam cushion up against the laryngeal inlet, thereby creating a seal from the environment. Using the laryngeal mask airway as a control device, the glottic aperture seal airway was tested for time and ease of insertion, fiberoptic alignment with the laryngeal inlet, and PFES in 18 lightly sedated and locally anesthetized volunteers. RESULTS: The glottic aperture seal and laryngeal mask airways were inserted with equal ease and speed. The fiberoptic alignment with the larynx was excellent for both the glottic aperture seal and laryngeal mask airways. In all volunteers, the mean +/- SD PFES values at 0-, 10-, 20-, 30-, and 40-ml balloon inflation volumes of the glottic aperture seal airway were 23.4 +/- 11.8, 29.6 +/- 12.4, 42.7 +/- 12.5, 56.9 +/- 5.6, and 60 +/- 0 cm H2O, respectively; the PFES at > or = 20 ml balloon inflation volume of the glottic aperture seal airway was significantly greater than with the laryngeal mask airway (19.4 +/- 6.7 cm H2O, P < 0.01). A PFES of > or =60 cm H2O was achieved with the glottic aperture seal airway in all volunteers (n = 2 at 10 ml, n = 3 at 20 ml, n = 9 at 30 ml, and n = 4 at 40 ml). The glottic aperture seal airway did not cause any trauma. CONCLUSION: In awake volunteers, the glottic aperture seal and laryngeal mask airways were equally easy to insert and position. The glottic aperture seal airway was capable of achieving a higher PFES than the laryngeal mask airway.     

Propofol, but not thiopentone or etomidate, enhances isoflurane-induced coronary vasodilatation in dogs

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that thiopentone, propofol, and etomidate alter the coronary vascular effects of abruptly administered isoflurane. METHODS: Dogs (n = 6) received inspired isoflurane 5% in the presence of thiopentone (20 mg.kg-1 induction dose and 20 mg.kg-1.hr-1 infusion), propofol (5 mg.kg-1 induction dose and 40 mg.kg-1.hr-1 infusion), etomidate (2 mg.kg-1 induction dose and 5 mg.kg-1.hr-1 infusion), or isoflurane (1.0 MAC) anaesthesia in a random fashion. Haemodynamics were assessed in the conscious state, during baseline anaesthesia, and at 30 sec intervals for five minutes after beginning isoflurane 5%. RESULTS: Rapidly administered isoflurane caused greater (P < 0.05) reductions in coronary vascular resistance in thiopentone- or propofol--than in isoflurane-anaesthetized dogs. Isoflurane produced greater (P < 0.05) increases in the ratio of coronary blood flow velocity to pressure-work index (an index of myocardial oxygen consumption; +109 +/- 19% during isoflurane alone vs +182 +/- 27% change from baseline during propofol and isoflurane) consistent with relatively greater direct coronary vasodilatation during baseline propofol than during baseline isoflurane anaesthesia. Isoflurane caused larger increases in coronary blood flow velocity in dogs anaesthetized with etomidate concomitant with higher coronary perfusion pressure and pressure-work index than in those anaesthetized with isoflurane alone. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that thiopentone, propofol, and etomidate each uniquely modify the coronary vascular responses to abrupt administration of high inspired concentrations of isoflurane in chronically instrumented dogs.     

Ease of insertion of the laryngeal mask airway by inexperienced personnel when using an introducer

The Portex introducer for the laryngeal mask airway was designed as an aid to successful insertion, acting as an idealised 'artificial hard palate' to guide the tip of the laryngeal mask into the correct position. A number of authors have investigated laryngeal mask insertion by unskilled personnel in certain situations, one example being nurses during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We investigated whether the introducer had any effect on the incidence of first-time successful LMA placement by unskilled personnel. These were nonanaesthetist doctors, randomly assigned to have one attempt at LMA insertion in an anaesthetised patient, with and without the introducer. In 44 patients with the LMA being inserted according to the manufacturer's instructions, there was a 68% success rate (14 failures). In 45 patients with the LMA being inserted with the aid of a Portex introducer, there was a 96% success rate (two failures). This was a highly significant improvement (p < 0.001).     

Long-term treatment of bleeding caused by portal hypertension in children

We have compared the hypnotic requirements for i.v. thiopentone alone and in combination with i.m. lignocaine or bupivacaine. Ninety women, ASA I-II, undergoing minor gynaecological surgery were allocated randomly to nine groups of 10 patients to receive thiopentone combined with i.m. lignocaine, bupivacaine or saline, respectively. Thiopentone was administered in bolus doses of 0.5 mg kg-1 every 30 s until loss of response to verbal command. Lignocaine and bupivacaine significantly enhanced the hypnotic effect of thiopentone in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum doses tested (lignocaine 3.0 mg kg-1 and bupivacaine 1.0 mg kg-1) reduced the hypnotic dose of thiopentone by 39% and 48%, respectively. We conclude that if lignocaine or bupivacaine are injected into soft tissue before induction of anaesthesia by thiopentone, the i.v. dose of the latter should be modified accordingly.     

Pulmonary airway resistance with the endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis that airway resistance is less with the laryngeal mask airway than with the endotracheal tube was tested. METHODS: Thirty-six paralyzed, anesthetized adult patients with no respiratory disease (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3; age, 18-80 yr) were randomly allocated (9 men, 9 women in each group) to receive either a size-4 laryngeal mask airway or an endotracheal tube (men, 9-mm ID; women, 8-mm ID). A pulmonary monitor with flow transducer and esophageal balloon was used to measure peak airway pressure and mean airway resistance (device resistance plus pulmonary airway resistance) at three different tidal volumes (5, 10, and 15 ml/kg). Device resistance was measured in vitro with the distal end of the endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway open to the atmosphere and using the same ventilator settings. Pulmonary airway resistance was derived by subtracting the mean device resistance from the mean airway resistance. RESULTS: Peak airway pressure, mean airway resistance, device resistance, and pulmonary airway resistance were greater for the endotracheal tube (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The laryngeal mask airway triggers less bronchoconstriction than does the endotracheal tube in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients. This may have implications for maintaining intraoperative pulmonary function and reducing the risk for atelectasis and pulmonary infection.     

High prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance amongst strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated from commercial sex workers in Bangladesh

We have evaluated if breathing spontaneously via a laryngeal mask airway is associated with a higher risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux compared with positive pressure ventilation via a laryngeal mask airway in 40 patients undergoing day-case gynaecological laparoscopy. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either positive pressure ventilation or breathe spontaneously via a laryngeal mask airway. Using continuous oesophageal pH monitoring, three patients in the ventilated group and one in the spontaneous breathing group had gastrooesophageal reflux (P = 0.29). We found no evidence to suggest that breathing spontaneously via a laryngeal mask airway increased the risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux compared with positive pressure ventilation in this group of patients.     

Night blindness secondary to vitamin A deficiency in a patient with bile duct strictures after liver transplantation

We have studied the incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux associated with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in 82 paralysed patients undergoing ventilation for elective orthopaedic surgery. Anaesthesia was managed by skilled LMA users. A pH-sensitive probe was passed nasally into the oesophagus before induction and recordings made during five phases of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl and maintained with 0.5-1.5% isoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Neuromuscular block was produced with vecuronium and the train-of-four count maintained at < or = 1. Towards the end of surgery, neuromuscular function was allowed to recover spontaneously. All LMAs were inserted at the first attempt and ventilation was successful in all patients. There were no adverse airway events. Mean oesophageal pH values during each phase of anaesthesia were: before insertion 5.88 (SD 0.77), placement 5.85 (0.74), maintenance 5.89 (0.73), emergence 5.71 (0.78) and removal 5.82 (0.75). There were no reflux events (pH < 4.0) during any phase of anaesthesia. We conclude that the incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux is low in paralysed patients undergoing ventilation for elective orthopaedic surgery when antagonism of neuromuscular block is avoided. The validity of these findings for unskilled LMA users is unknown.     

Use of Diprivan for digestive system endoscopy

After evaluation of the patient's clinical condition and appropriate premedication is seems reasonable to suggest for: 1. Endoscopic procedures involving the gastro-intestinal tract: slow, titrated induction, using 0.5 to 1 mg.kg-1 of propofol, until the required level of sedation has been achieved; this may or not be preceded by the injection of a low dose of midazolam (0.02 to 0.03 mg.kg-1) or of alfentanil (5 micrograms.kg-1); maintenance is achieved by bolus injections of 20 mg (up to 0.5 mg.kg-1); maintenance of spontaneous ventilation, with oxygen administration is the rule; SpO2 is monitored routinely; anaesthesia has to be performed according to the recommendations of the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR) and the anaesthetist must be prepared to manage any incident during the endoscopy and the recovery period. 2. Procedures involving the biliary tract and the oesophagus, which require deeper anaesthesia: induction should again be titrated using a very slow infusion, with doses ranging from 0.9 to 2.2 mg.kg-1); the maintenance requires a continuous infusion, doses ranging from 4 to 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 when propofol is administered alone and from 4 to 12 mg.kg-1.h-1 when combined with an opioid; continuous oxygenation is necessary using a nasal airway; the need for intubation depends on the type of procedure and the status of the patient; the same monitoring devices and similar safety measures are required during and after procedure as for any anaesthetic or sedation, especially when it is performed in day-case patients or outside the operating theatre.     

Propofol-air-oxygen anesthesia reduces the incidence of sore throat after laryngeal mask anesthesia

We investigated the effects of the presence or absence of N2O in propofol anesthesia using a laryngeal mask on the incidence of postoperative sore throat. In the N2O-combined anesthesia group (n = 25), score 0 (no sore throat) was observed in 11 patients; score 1 (slight pain and discomfort that improved on the next day of operation) in 9; and score 2 (persistent pain on the next day) in 5. In the non-N2O-combined anesthesia group (n = 25), score 0 was observed in 21 patients, score 1 in 3; and score 2 in 1, showing a significantly lower incidence of sore throat and milder sore throat than in the N2O-combined anesthesia group. These results suggest that propofol anesthesia using a laryngeal mask not combined with N2O reduces the incidence of postoperative sore throat.