Communicable disease in African immigrants in Minneapolis

To perform a laparoscopic appendectomy, three trocars are usually needed. In order to reduce abdominal wall trauma, we have adopted an umbilical one-puncture laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (UOPLAA). We did a retrospective study of UOPLAA performed during last 2 years on 200 children aged from 5 to 18 years (median, 9 years). The patients were selected after clinical examination. No child with advanced generalized peritonitis or an abscess with a palpable mass was a candidate for this technique. UOPLAA was successful in 184 patients (92%). In 16 cases (8%), an additional trocar was required to manage perforated or retrocecal appendicitis. The mean operative time was 15 min, and the mean hospital stay was 2 days. There were no intraoperative complications. There were 10 (5%) postoperative complications (three parietal and seven intraabdominal). Four patients (2%) needed reoperation under general anesthesia. The UOPLAA is our preference in cases of acute nonperforated appendicitis because it is simple and fast, with good cosmetic results; but in 8% of our cases, an intraoperative difficulty (retrocecal location, abnormal adhesive band, peritonitis, etc.) arose that required the introduction of additional devices to ensure the safety of the laparoscopic procedure.     

Laparoscopic appendectomy in the adult

AIM OF THE STUDY: The benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy remain controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four hundred and forty-eight patients operated on for suspected appendicitis during a 5-year period were analysed in a retrospective study. The preoperative diagnosis was corrected in 21.4% of the cases (8.1% for males and 28.7% for females) and the conversion rate was 9.7%. There were 17 patients with generalized peritonitis and 28 with localized peritonitis. During the past year, this surgical method was introduced in another hospital and a prospective study included 92 consecutive patients operated on for appendicitis. The operating time was 53 minutes and the conversion rate was 7.6%. There were five patients with generalized peritonitis and eight with localized peritonitis. RESULTS: There were no postoperative deaths. In the first period, the morbidity rate was 2.3% in the laparoscopic group without conversion. After pathological examination, there was a 14.2% rate of normal appendix. The mean hospital stay was 4.3 days. In the second period, there were only three minor complications and the mean hospital stay was 4.19 days. CONCLUSION: The choice of laparoscopic approach is associated with some advantages: corrections of the diagnosis (mainly in young women) and simplification of the postoperative course, provided that the surgeon has sufficient experience.     

Diagnostic laparoscopy through the right lower abdominal incision following open appendectomy

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laparoscopy through the right lower abdominal incision following open appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis may help in making the correct diagnosis in the absence of pathology of the appendix. METHODS: Fourteen patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis underwent diagnostic laparoscopy through the right lower quadrant incision after open appendectomy to exclude further pathology in the case of a noninflamed appendix. RESULTS: In 10 of the 14 patients, laparoscopy helped to correct the diagnosis. In two patients, the etiology of the acute right lower abdominal pain remained unclear. In two others, histological examination showed acute appendicitis despite a normal macroscopic appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic laparoscopy through the right lower quadrant incision may help to correct the diagnosis in patients who are operated on for clinically acute appendicitis but in whom no acute appendicitis or other pathological findings are seen.     

Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis

BACKGROUND: Ever since laparoscopy was first applied to the treatment of appendicitis, a controversy has existed as to whether the acknowledged benefits of a minimally invasive approach warrant its preference over the conventional treatment, which historically has had relatively low morbidity. The purpose of this study was to determine if laparoscopic appendectomy should be performed preferentially in cases where surgeons are not limited by technical constraints. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 112 patients operated on for suspected appendicitis from June 1995 to July 1996. Forty-eight patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, and 64 had conventional open appendectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed using a three-trocar technique and the endoscopic stapler. Results: The histopathological diagnosis of appendicitis was confirmed in 82.6% of cases. Overall, laparoscopic appendectomy reduced length of hospital stay (1.54 versus 4.09 days; p < 0.0001) compared to conventional open appendectomy, with no significant difference in hospital cost ($6430 versus $6669; p = ns). Although the total OR time was longer in the laparoscopic group (75.8 versus 60.2 min; p < 0.0001), laparoscopy resulted in both a reduction in length of stay (2.17 versus 6.27 days; p < 0.0001) and hospital cost ($7506 versus $10,504; p < 0.02) for cases of perforated appendicitis. Conversion to open appendectomy was performed in 6% of patients, all of whom had perforated appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that most cases of acute appendicitis with suspected perforation could be managed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay and hospital costs in patients with perforated appendicitis.     

Cerebral MRI in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia]

Cystic fibrosis is a common and potentially life-threatening hereditary disease which can affect numerous organs, particularly the digestive tract. CASE REPORT: A 4.5-year-old boy exhibited two little known clinical manifestations: an appendiceal mucocele and repeated intussusceptions. In spite of an appendectomy, intussusception relapsed and an ileocolic resection was necessary 2 years later. DISCUSSION: Appendiceal diseases in cystic fibrosis represent a large spectrum, ie, distention on the appendiceal lumen, engorged with sticky mucous matter, which becomes an appendiceal mucocele, peritonitis with an appendiceal perforation due to delayed diagnosis since acute appendicitis is difficult to diagnose in these patients. Intussusception is rarely observed in cystic fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Appendiceal mucocele could be a cause of intussusception. If an appendectomy is performed, resection of a part of the cecum, around the appendix, could be useful in preventing again mucocele formation.     

Coronary flow measurements for evaluation of patients after stent implantation

The treatment of "asymptomatic" intestinal malrotation remains controversial, particularly beyond the neonatal period. Two cases illustrate the application of laparoscopy for correction of malrotation: one in an older child and another in an asymptomatic infant. Both patients recovered well and were discharged 2 days after surgery. Laparoscopic appendectomy and duodenocolonic dissociation allows excellent visualization of the duodenocolic and Ladd's bands and easily accommodates appendectomy. The availability of this minimal-access technique should encourage correction of malrotation in the asymptomatic patient.     

Pre-syncope and syncope at the operating table--diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the initial experience at two different urologic centers of the 20 first laparoscopic nephrectomies performed either by transperitoneal laparoscopy (10 cases) in one center or by retroperitoneal laparoscopy (lumboscopy, 10 cases) in the other center. METHODS: 5 males and 15 females with a mean age of 36 years (range 3-74) were operated on the right side in 8 cases and on the left side in 12 cases. Nephrectomies were indicated in 18 cases for benign renal disease, and in 2 cases for ureteric tumor (1 patient in each group). The techniques of these two approaches are described. RESULTS: The mean operating time was shorter with lumboscopy (173 min) than with laparoscopy (210 min), probably due to the direct approach to the renal compartment without intraperitoneal dissection with lumboscopy. There were no severe intraoperative or postoperative complications, but one hematoma of the renal area in the laparoscopic group. The mean postoperative hospital stay was identical following lumboscopy and laparoscopy (4.3 and 4.2 days, respectively). CONCLUSION: These two approaches can be used to perform nephrectomy. In this initial experience, the results appear to be equivalent in terms of morbidity and postoperative hospital stay, but the operating time appears to be shorter with lumboscopy. Larger studies comparing respective nephrectomy conversion rates would provide other arguments in favor of one or other of these techniques.     

Carcinoid tumors of the appendix

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study of 41 patients with histologically confirmed diagnosis of appendix carcinoid tumors was undertaken by reviewing the surgical records at Massachusetts General Hospital. METHODS: There were 8 male and 33 female patients (mean age 32 years). Twenty-two patients (54%) presented with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis. In 19 patients (46%) the lesions were discovered incidentally. The tumors were located in 32 patients at the tip, in 6 patients in the middle third, and in 3 patients at the base of the appendix. The tumor was less than 1 cm in diameter in 32 patients, between 1 and 2 cm in 7 patients, and was bigger than 2 cm in 2 patients. In 29 patients, the depth of tumor penetration was confined to the submucosa or to the muscle layers of the appendix, and in 8 patients the serosa was involved. In 4 patients, evidence of tumor extension into the meso-appendicular fat was present, including one patient with a tumor bigger than 2 cm and local lymph-node metastases. Forty patients underwent appendectomy alone. One patient with a tumor size bigger than 2 cm in diameter with positive lymph nodes in the mesoappendix underwent secondary right hemicolectomy. Complete follow-up was achieved in 35 patients, and all patients remained free of tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that appendiceal carcinoids are rare and most often are asymptomatic. Tumors of less than 1 cm are adequately managed by appendectomy alone. The appropriate treatment for tumors of 1 to 2 cm continues to be controversial. Right hemicolectomy is recommended for all tumors larger than 2 cm, whereas preference for an aggressive approach should be given in young patients.     

Complications related to different continence mechanisms in ileocecal reservoirs

PURPOSE: We compared the incidence, treatment and outcome of complications related to different continence mechanisms in a single institutional series of continent urinary diversions using an ileocecal reservoir. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 1990 through October 1996 in 193 consecutive cases an ileocecal pouch (Mainz I) was used as a low pressure, high capacity reservoir. A submucosally embedded in situ appendix was used in 96 patients (mean age 57.2 years, mean followup 35.6 months) and an ileal intussusception valve was used in 106 (mean age 58.4, mean followup 33.1 months). Without exception the stoma was placed in the umbilicus. RESULTS: In 172 patients (85.2%) no stoma related complication was observed. In 17 patients (17.7%) with appendix stoma 23 reinterventions were performed, for appendico-umbilical stenosis in all but 2 cases (15.6%), occurring after a mean of 20.4 months. Two complete appendix necroses required replacement by ileal nipple. Stomal stenoses could be corrected as minor outpatient procedures. In 13 of 106 patients (12.3%) with intussuscepted ileal nipple a second operation became necessary after a mean interval of 9.6 months (partial/complete necrosis of nipple in 4 cases, dislocation of nipple from ileocecal valve in 3, detachment from fascia in 4 and stomal stenosis in 2). Whereas no calculi were observed in the appendix group, stones had to be removed from 3 patients (2.8%) with ileal nipple. CONCLUSIONS: In situ appendix and intussuscepted ileal valve techniques are satisfactory in providing ileocecal reservoir continence. Besides the known advantages of the appendix as the primary reconstructive approach, the treatment of subsequent complications is simple. Therefore, whenever an appropriate appendix is encountered it should be the intestinal segment of choice in forming a continence mechanism.     

Randomized, single-blinded trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: effects on postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND: The benefit of laparoscopy to patients has been clearly established in adults undergoing cholecystectomy. Results are less clear for appendectomy. The current study was undertaken to compare the respective 3-day postoperative periods after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. METHODS: Sixty-three children (aged 8-15 yr) scheduled for appendectomy were randomly assigned to two groups: open and laparoscopic. Postoperative evaluation included delay of postoperative recovery (walking and feeding), pain assessment by visual analog scale during the 3 subsequent days, amount of nalbuphine administered via a patient-controlled analgesia system during the first 48 h and responses by children, parents, and nurses on the overall quality of analgesia. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups for demographic data (particularly macroscopic aspect of appendix) analgesia, sedation, delay before eating and walking, incidence of urinary retention, nausea, vomiting. Operative time was long (P < or = to 0.05) in the laparoscopic group (54 +/- 17 min) than in the open group (39 +/- 18 min). Thirty five percent of the children had pain at the shoulder in the LAP group versus ten percent in the open group (P < or = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy did not improve analgesia and postoperative recovery after appendectomy in children.     

A four-year experience with laparoscopy in the management of appendicitis

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to determine the influences of laparoscopy in the management and outcome of patients with appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 154 consecutive patients who were treated for suspected appendicitis. The pre-operative diagnosis included appendicitis, right lower quadrant pain of unknown etiology, and generalized peritonitis. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was used in 108 patients, including 70 laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) and 31 LAs converted to open appendectomy (OA). Forty-six patients had OA. The average operating time for LA was 74.3 minutes and 48.8 minutes with OA. Postoperative complications for LA (7%) included 1 trochar wound hemorrhage, 2 wound infections, and 2 intra-abdominal sepsis; and for OA (9%) were 1 post-operative intra-abdominal hemorrhage, 4 wound infections, 1 wound dehiscence, and 1 intra-abdominal sepsis. Post-operative stay for LA averaged 2.5 days and for OA averaged 4.5 days (P = .0049). LA patients had a considerably faster return to work and/or normal activity than OA patients (P = .00065). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy influenced the management of 29% of patients presenting with suspected appendicitis. LA resulted in shorter hospitalization and a more rapid return to work and/or normal activity than OA.     

The spiritual and psychological explanations for loss experience

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature regarding the role of laparoscopy during pregnancy, particularly adnexal mass and non-obstetric surgery, incorporating the results of a series of 9 cases of laparoscopy during pregnancy at our centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Medline search was performed to review the literature, and the reference lists provided by those articles were further explored for citations regarding laparoscopic adnexal surgery, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy. Our series of 9 patients consisted of pregnant patients with adnexal mass or acute abdomen who would otherwise have undergone exploratory laparotomy. Follow-up data for these 9 cases were collected by office visits, inquiry to the primary referring physicians, and telephone calls to the patient. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 42 additional cases of operative pelvic laparoscopy and 51 cases of abdominal operative laparoscopy (cholecystectomy and appendectomy). The publications, particularly regarding cholecystectomy, were supportive of the laparoscopic approach during pregnancy. All of the patients in our series had favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced operative laparoscopy has been successfully performed for certain indications during pregnancy.     

Feasibility of "limited" echo imaging: characterization of incidental findings

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome after an appendectomy during pregnancy, especially focusing on fertility. METHODS: The Danish National Registry of Patients identified 117 pregnant women who had had an appendectomy during the period 1980 to 1985. One hundred-and-one of these women answered a questionnaire designed to focus on long-term complications, including infertility, during a 4 to 9 year period after the appendectomy. More than a 2-year attempt to conceive was defined as infertility. RESULTS: Of the 101 women 15 with a normal appendix had a new intraperitoneal operation due to different indications. Three of these women had intraperitoneal adhesions. In one patient, adhesions were located on the Fallopian Tube but the location did not influence fertility. Five of the 101 women complained of infertility as defined; all had a normal appendix and none had intraperitoneal surgery during the observation period. Two of these five women conceived later during the observation period; one had confounding female and male infertility factors and two were not examined. CONCLUSIONS: Appendectomy during pregnancy of a normal, inflamed or perforated appendix does not seem to cause clinically significant intraperitoneal adhesions or infertility later in life.     

Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, the number of complications associated with the laparoscopic technique, and the effect of leaving a macroscopically normal-looking appendix in place. DESIGN: Three prospective protocols. SETTING: Three departments of surgery, one in Norway and two in Sweden. SUBJECTS: 1043 patients aged 15 years or over. INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis who were to be operated on. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, mortality, and histological appearance of removed appendices, and outcome whether or not the patient was operated on. RESULTS: 819 patients had appendectomies (61% laparoscopically and 39% by conversion to open operation) with a total complication rate of 10%. In 211 patients a diagnostic laparoscopy was done as a single procedure. There were 181 women in this group and 86 of them had gynaecological disorders. The complication rate was 2% among these 211 patients and after a follow up of two years no patients had been readmitted for appendicectomy. 13 patients were subjected to other open procedures. The overall mortality was 0.4%. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy is safe and can be recommended in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, particularly in women. A macroscopically normal-looking appendix can be left in place.     

Concomitant pneumococcal appendicitis, peritonitis, and meningitis

A 9-year-old boy developed pneumococcal meningitis and peritonitis following appendectomy. Subsequent pathologic examination showed Gram-positive diplococci in the appendix. Cultures of the peritoneal fluid, blood, and spinal fluid showed Diplococcus pneumoniae. The experience illustrates the danger of assuming that all pneumococcus peritonitis is the primary variety and the advisability of routine Gram stain of the peritoneal fluid at operation in order to select the appropriate antibiotic.     

Is there a duty to die?

OBJECTIVE: To review appendectomy cases in children at a small community hospital and to compare with experience at larger centers. DESIGN: A five-year retrospective study. SETTING: Bartlett Regional Hospital, Juneau, Alaska. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of children age 14 and younger who underwent appendectomy from 1991 through 1996 were reviewed; 79 charts were found. Cases were grouped as simple appendicitis, advanced appendicitis, and appendectomy without appendicitis. Variables considered included: length of symptoms at first contact, time from onset until surgery, presence or absence of classical symptoms, post-operative complications, length of hospital stay. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: 51 cases (64.6%) of simple appendicitis, 22 cases (27.9%) of advanced disease, and 6 cases (7.6%) of normal appendix occurred. Advanced disease was high (66.7%) in children less than 5, and low (22.7%) in ages 10-14. Parental delay > 48 hours in seeking care was a significant factor in advanced disease, professional delay (time from first exam until surgery) was not. Post-surgical complications occurred in 7 (31.8%) cases of advanced disease and in none of the cases with simple appendicitis. Advanced disease cases had an average hospital stay of 8.59 days (+/-2.92) vs. 3.86 days (+/-1.46) for simple appendicitis. Review of appendicitis in children at this hospital compared favorably with the experience at larger medical centers.     

Laparoscopic appendectomy. A comparison with open appendectomy

PURPOSE: As laparoscopy becomes a greater part of a general surgeon's practice, each new application must be analyzed. The purpose of this article is to report a four-year experience with laparoscopic appendectomy, with special attention to complications. METHODS: All patients undergoing appendectomy by members of the General Surgery Department of Columbia Hospital between December 20, 1990, and December 24, 1994, were included (n = 434). Medical records were reviewed, and data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis, analysis of variance, and Pearson's chi-squared test. RESULTS: The number of post-operative intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic appendectomy tended to be higher; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conversely, all other complications combined demonstrated a rate of 4.3 percent for laparoscopic procedures and a rate of 8.5 percent for open procedures. Again this tended toward, but did not reach, statistical significance. Advantage in length of stay was approximately two days, with a mean length of stay for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy of 3.3 days, whereas that for open appendectomy was 5.7 days. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy has significant advantages in terms of patient comfort and length of stay, and its overall complication rate seems to be lower than with open procedures; however, its rate of intra-abdominal abscess may actually be higher. Further study is recommended.     

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass

To determine the feasibility and the effectiveness of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass (MICABG) in patients with left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery disease, we evaluated 90 consecutive patients who underwent MICABG at the University Hospital of Groningen. PATIENTS: Between January 1995 and December 1996, 50 patients (mean age 60 +/- 10.3 years) with documented myocardial ischemia and isolated stenosis of the LAD were selected for MICABG. Patients with any associated cardiac disease or with acute or evolving myocardial infarction were excluded. METHODS: A small left antero-lateral thoracotomy in the 5th intercostal space was made in all patients, anastomosing the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to the LAD. A short-term (3 days) postoperative rehabilitation programme was used. Emotional stress (STAY-DY-1 score), wound pain (VAS: visual analogue score) and O2-saturation after a 6 min walking test were measured during hospitalisation and at the first follow-up examination (2.5 week after discharge). RESULTS: Mean operative time was 92 +/- 25 min (range 60-170). We recorded 1 (1.1%) in-hospital death and three cases (3.3%) of perioperative myocardial infarction. In two cases the MICABG was converted to the midline sternotomy. One patient underwent urgent reoperation on postoperative day 1 via midline sternotomy. Mean hospital stay was 4.4 +/- 2 days. Emotional stress was significantly reduced during and after hospitalisation, compared with the admission day. Wound pain was mild (3.5/10 VAS) on postoperative day 1 and reduced significantly during hospitalisation and at first follow-up examination. O2-saturation after a 6 min walking test had significantly improved at the first follow-up examination. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that MICABG is feasible and effective in patients with LAD stenosis and leads to a fast psycho-physical recovery.     

Recovery from pre-operative sedation with clonidine--brain stem auditory evoked response

Diagnostic laparoscopy has been an integral part of our surgical practice for over 4 years. Between 1988-1992, 100 diagnostic laparoscopies have been performed in this institution without mortality. We have found the procedure to be particularly useful in the following situation: 1) Hepatobiliary disease where it is used in conjunction with targeted liver biopsy. 2) Acute emergency cases. These include the diagnosis of acute peritonitis, abdominal trauma and in patients with suspected mesenteric ischaemia. 3) In the staging of intra-abdominal malignancy especially gastric, oesophageal, colonic, peritoneal and pancreatic neoplasms.     

Can we recognize the pathological character of the appendix during laparoscopy? Prospective study: 81 cases

In a prospective study of 81 patients, the appendix was photographed during a laparoscopy performed for pain in the right iliac fossa. An appendicectomy was performed in 65 patients, for the remaining 16, another cause for the pain was found and the appendix was left in place. The evaluation of the photographed appendix was formed afterwards by a group of 10 surgeons and compared with the histopathological results. In 20 cases (30%) the appendix was normal. In 7 (10%) minimal mucosal inflammation was found and in 38 (60%) acute appendicitis. All the surgeons correctly recognised acute appendicitis. The accuracy of recognition of a normal appendix was 70% overall, and the maximum risk of leaving an early form of appendicitis to evolve was 14%. We propose not removing an appendix judged to be normal during laparoscopy if no other cause for the pain is found. A short course of antibiotics would cover the low risk of allowing a very early appendicitis to develop.