DETERMINATION OF TOTAL VICINAL DIKETONES IN BEER BY HEADSPACE CAPILLARY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

The determination of total vicinal diketones in beer by the headspace capillary gas chromatography method of the Institute of Brewing Analysis Committee has been collaboratively tested by the members of the Analysis Committee of the European Brewery Convention. Two collaborative trials on three beer samples were performed in 14 laboratories. Repeatability (r₉₅) and reproducibility (Ras) values were obtained for 9 laboratories over the range of 20 to 90 μg. It was judged that reproducibility coefficients ranging after the second test from 32 to 94 were poor but it was decided that the method should nevertheless be included in the Analytica EBC as a guideline method with notice on its poor precision .     

DETERMINATION OF THE VOLATILE COMPONENTS OF BEER

A method relying on headspace sampling and gas chromatography for the determination of the lower boiling point volatile compounds (fusel oils) in beer, has been approved by the Analysis Committee of the Institute of Brewing (IOB), for inclusion in Recommended Methods of Analysis. In view of the large values obtained for precision in terms of repeatability (r₉₅) and reproducibility (R₉₅) and the differences in gas chromatographic equipment used by individual brewing laboratories, the method is considered not to be ideal, but is given as a guideline only. The IOB Analysis Committee has recommended a method relying on gas chromatography and flame photometric detection for the determination of dimethyl sulphide in beer. Repeatability (r₉₅) and reproducibility (R₉₅) values of 3.3 μg/litre and 3.66+0.168 m μg/litre (where m is concentration), respectively, were obtained over the range 20–50 μg/litre. Methods currently used in brewing laboratories, for the measurement of vicinal diketones, are being surveyed with a view to obtaining a suitable method for collaborative testing by the Analysis Committee.     

COLLABORATIVE DETERMINATION OF THE PH OF BEER AND WORT

A method for the determination of pH in wort and beer has been tested for precision by the Analysis Committee of the Institute of Brewing . Over the pH range 3.94 to 5.04 it was judged that precision values were independent of the pH value of the sample. Values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 0.025 and 0.129 respectively .     

DETERMINATION OF ETHANOL IN BEER BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY (DIRECT INJECTION)—COLLABORATIVE TRIAL

A method employing gas chromatography for the determination of ethanol in beer has been collaboratively tested by the Analysis Committee of the Institute of Brewing. It was judged that precision values were independent of concentration over the range 0.93 to 6.05% V/V ethanol. Repeatability (r₉₅) and reproducibility (R₉₅) values of 0.061 and 0.136 respectively, were obtained over this range. At a mean level of 9.17% V/V, the r₉₅ and R₉₅ values were 0.154 and 0.284 respectively. This was probably due to dilution errors as the sample had to be diluted to bring it within the linear range of the method. A comparison of the precision values given by the gas chromatographic method, with those obtained in 1991/1992 by 8 laboratories in a major brewing company using 12 sample pairs, for the IOB Recommended Distillation Method, revealed that there is no significant difference between the precision data for the two methods.     

COLLABORATIVE DETERMINATION OF BEER FOAM STABILITY BY RUDIN AND NIBEM

Two methods, the “Rudin” method and the “Nibem” method have been tested for the determination of foam stability of beer by the Analysis Committee of the Institute of Brewing . For the Rudin method, over the range 90 to 102 seconds, it was judged that precision values were independent of the foam stability of the sample. Values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 6 and 22 seconds, respectively . For the Nibem method, precision was also independent of the foam stability of the sample over the range 213 to 246 seconds. Values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 22 and 70 seconds, respectively . The two methods ranked the foam stability of the three beers tested differently. This is to be expected, bearing in mind the different principles of the two procedures .     

Determination of the Total Soluble Nitrogen Content of Malt and Beer by the Dumas Combustion Method: Collaborative Trial

The determination of the total soluble nitrogen content of malt and beer, by the Dumas procedure, has jointly been collaboratively tested by the Analysis Committee of the Institute of Brewing (IOB) and the European Brewery Convention (EBC). Five samples of beer (range 362 to 1159 mg/l) and five samples of malt (range EBC 0.598 to 0.798 %m/m (dry basis) and IOB 0.534 to 0.706 %m/m (dry basis)) were distributed to eighteen participating laboratories for analysis. Precision values were judged to be independent of the mean soluble nitrogen content for malt by both IOB and EBC methodologies. Values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 0.047 and 0.136%m/m for EBC laboratory wort and 0.039 and 0.144 %m/m for IOB laboratory wort respectively. Precision values for beer were judged to be dependent upon the mean nitrogen content (m) in the case of r₉₅ and independent of the mean nitrogen content in the case of R₉₅. Values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 0.074m and 120 mg/l respectively.     

ESTIMATION OF ENDO BETA-GLUCANASE ACTIVITY IN MALT USING A VISCOMETRIC METHOD

A viscometric method for estimation of endo beta-glucanase activity in malt has been collaboratively tested by the Institute of Brewing Analysis Committee. Ten participating laboratories analysed five pairs of malt samples in the range 176 to 1238 IRV units. The repeatability (r₉₅) values ranged from 22 to 122 IRV units and the reproducibility (R₉₅) values from 93 to 650 IRV units. The results indicated that R₉₅, but not r₉₅, was dependent on endo beta-glucanase activity. Overall precision values were 76.8 for r₉₅ and 0.506Mean + 4.786 for R₉₅. It was decided that the method would be included in IOB Methods of Analysis but that attention would be drawn to the poor precision values obtained in this and previous collaborative trials.     

Determination of the N‐Nitrosodimethylamine Content of Beer and Malt — A Collaborative Trial

After about fifteen years a study was carried out to determine the variation in results of the N‐nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) determination in beer and malt carried out in different laboratories, in order to obtain an overall view of the precision of the various methods used. Two collaborative trials were carried out by the EBC Analysis Committee during 1998. Repeatability values (r₉₅) for beer in the range of 0.09 ÷ 0.13 and for malt 0.33 ÷ 0.42 were found. Reproducibility values (R₉₅) for beer in the range of 0.45 ÷ 0.54 and for malt 0.65 ÷ 4.08 were obtained.     

THE DETERMINATION OF SULPHUR DIOXIDE IN BEER—COLLABORATIVE TRIAL OF FOUR METHODS

The Institute of Brewing Analysis Committee has collaboratively tested four methods for the determination of sulphur dioxide in beer over the range 1 to 40 mg/litre. The p-rosaniline method (r₉₅ = 0.51 + 0.10 m. R₉₅ = 0.63 + 0.26 m) was found to have the best precision and is recommended as an alternative to the Monier Williams method (r₉₅ = 0.43 + 0.15 m, R₉₅ = 1.86 + 0.27 m) where high precision at low sulphur dioxide levels is required. The dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) method and the IOB rapid distillation method showed considerably worse precisions.     

COLLABORATIVE DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY BY DENSITY METER

A method employing a density meter for the determination of specific gravity (SG) has been tested for the determination of the gravity (G) of beer, aqueous sugar solutions and aqueous ethanol solutions by the Analysis Committee of the Institute of Brewing. The term “gravity”, used throughout this report is defined by the equation G = SG × 1000. Repeatability (r₉₅) and reproducibility (R₉₅) values were calculated over the range 994.6 to 1124.2 gravity. For beer, it was judged that precision values were independent of the gravity of the sample. Values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 0.1 and 0.9, respectively, for instruments with a 5 figure display and 0.08 and 0.32, respectively, for instruments with a 6 figure display, over the range 999.1 to 1017.0 gravity. For solutions of ethanol in water, precision was also independent of the gravity of the sample. Values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 0.1 and 0.3, respectively, for instruments with a 5 figure display and 0.05 and 0.19, respectively, for instruments with a 6 figure display, over the range 994.6 to 999.1 gravity. For aqueous sugar solutions the values of r₉₅ and R₉₅ increased with increasing gravity. At 1049.3 gravity, values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 0.1 and 0.8, respectively, for instruments with a 5 figure display and 0.07 and 0.35, respectively, for instruments with a 6 figure display. At 1124.2 gravity values for r₉₅ and R₉₅ were 0.2 and 1.4, respectively, for instruments with a 5 figure display and 0.16 and 1.35, respectively, for instruments with a 6 figure display.     

DETERMINATION OF HOT WATER EXTRACT

The Analysis Committee of the European Brewery Convention has recommended that the Hot Water Extract procedure for malt, which relies on a coarse grind and single temperature mash (65°C), is included in Analytica-EBC, as an additional method to that of the EBC Extract procedure. The Committee accepted the precision values obtained by the Institute of Brewing on the 1984 Check Malt. Repeatability (r₉₅) and reproducibility (R₉₅) values in litre degrees/kg were 2.14 and 3.48 respectively, for mean value of 295.3 at a Miag 0.7 mm setting, and 1.93 and 2.90 respectively, for a mean value of 298.2 at a Miag 0.2 mm setting.     

DETERMINATION OF DIMETHYL SUPLHIDE IN BEER BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY — COLLABORATIVE TRIAL

The Analysis Committee has collaboratively tested both routine headspace gas chromatographic methods and a standardised method for the determination of dimethyl sulphide in beer using the flame photometric and flame ionisation detectors available in the participating laboratories. The mean repeatability value (r₉₅) was 7.8 μg/litre for the concentration range 12–65 μg/litre, and the reproducibility value (R₉₅) showed the relationship R₉₅ = 18.1 + 0.452m μg/litre to the concentration (m). No differences in precision were attributed either to the methods or the types of detectors used.     

ESTIMATION OF α- AND β-ACIDS IN HOP EXTRACTS BY HPLC

A procedure relying on high performance liquid chromatography for the estimation of α-acids and β-acids in hop extracts has been collaboratively tested by members of a Sub-Committee of the Institute of Brewing Analysis Committee and is recommended for use. No significant differences were found between precision values obtained using peak height and peak area measurements. For α-acids, the mean repeatability (r₉₅) and reproducibility (R₉₅) values were 1-3 and 2-4% m/m respectively over the range 41–62% m/m. For β-acids they were 0-9 and 2-0% m/m respectively over the range 11 to 35% m/m. The precision values were judged to be independent of concentration.     

ESTIMATION OF ISO-ALPHA-ACIDS IN BEER BY HPLC-COLLABORATIVE TRIAL

A procedure relying on high performance liquid chromatography for the estimation of iso-alpha-acids in beer has been collaboratively tested by the IOB Analysis Committee. In addition the trial samples were analysed by the IOB Recommended Method for the measurement of bitterness (BU). It was judged that the results obtained by the HPLC method were not sufficiently precise to permit adoption as a Recommended Method. However, since the method has the advantage of measuring bitterness in terms of iso-alpha-acids, it is suggested as an alternative to that of the Recommended Method. The iso-alpha-acids are absorbed from beer on to a C₁₈ Bond Elut column and then selectively desorbed prior to isocratic analysis by HPLC using an eluting solvent of methanol/water/phosphoric acid/tetrabutylammonium hydroxide and a C₁₈ radialpak cartridge. For both methods the repeatability values (r₉₅) were not dependent upon mean concentration (m) whereas the reproducibility values (R₉₅) were dependent upon concentration. The values of (r₅₃) and (R₉₅) obtained were 2.11 and (1.38 + 0.134 m) over the concentration range 13.8 to 34.0 mg/litre for the HPLC procedure and 1.20 and (0.76 + 0.122 m) over the concentration range 15.4 to 38.6 BU for the Recommended Method.     

DETERMINATION OF VICINAL DIKETONES IN BEER BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY (HEADSPACE TECHNIQUE)—COLLABORATIVE TRIAL

Two methods for the determination of vicinal diketones in beer have been collaboratively tested by the Analysis Committee of the Institute of Brewing and are recommended for use. Both methods employ gas chromatography and are essentially the same, except that one relies on the use of a packed column and the other on a capillary column. For diacetyl it was judged that repeatability (r₉₅) values were independent of concentration over the range 0.04 to 0.19 mg/litre. Over this range, r₉₅ values for diacetyl of 0.028, 0.020 and 0.026 mg/litre were obtained for capillary, packed columns and combined results respectively. Values for reproducibility (R₉₅) were judged to be dependent on the mean level (m). R₉₅ values were 0.032 + 0.68 m, 0.01 + 0.47 m and 0.005 + 0.67 m were obtained for capillary, packed columns and combined results respectively. For both methods the r₉₅ and R₉₅ values for 2,3-pentanedione were judged to be independent of concentration over the range 0.02 to 0.07 mg/litre. For capillary columns, packed columns and combined results respectively, r₉₅ values were 0.009, 0.009, 0.010 mg/litre and R₉₅ values were 0.037, 0.042 and 0.038 mg/litre.     

DETERMINATION OF S-METHYLMETHIONINE IN MALT BY ALKALINE HYDROLYSIS AND HEADSPACE GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY - A COLLABORATIVE TRIAL

The Institute of Brewing Analysis Committee has collaboratively tested routine methods for the determination of S-methylmethionine in malt. Eleven participating laboratories each used their own method of alkaline hydrolysis followed by headspace gas chromatographic determination of the resultant dimethyl sulphide. Mean repeatability values r(95) were 1.21 and 2.47mg/kg, and mean reproducibility values R(95) were 4.30 and 5.60 mg/kg for mean concentrations of 5.00 and 7.27 mg/kg respectively.     

COLLABORATIVE TRIAL ON THE DETERMINATION OF BETA-GLUCANASE IN MALT BY VISCOMETRIC AND DYE-LABELLED METHODS

The results of a collaborative trial to compare a dye-labelled beta-glucan method with that of a viscometric procedure, for estimating the beta-glucanase content of malt, have demonstrated that overall the precisions of both methods are similar. There has been an improvement in the precision of the viscometric method (which is not a Recommended Method) compared with values obtained in previous trials. The Institute of Brewing Analysis Committee judged that the results obtained by the dye-labelled beta-glucan method were not sufficiently precise to permit adoption as a Recommended Method. However, since this procedure has advantages of speed and ease of operation, it is suggested as an alternative method to that relying on viscometry. It is envisaged that a further collaborative trial will be carried out when sufficient experience of the new method has been obtained. The repeatability (r₉₅) and reproducibility (R₉₅) values found were 0.190 m and 0.327 m over the concentration (m,U/kg) range 92–266 U/kg for the dye-labelled method, and 0.173 m and (91.4 + 0.0717 m) over the concentration (m,IRV) range 233–701 IRV units for the viscometric method.     

EXTRACT AND COLOUR DETERMINATION OF TORREFIED PRODUCTS (WHEAT,BARLEY AND RYE)—COLLABORATIVE TRIAL

A procedure for preparing torrefied products for analysis has been examined and the effects of this procedure on the determination of laboratory extract and colour have been collaboratively tested by the Analysis Committee of the Institute of Brewing. White malts of DP levels 50° and 100° IOB were used as the sources of enzymes in the mixed mash procedure. With these malts r₉₅ and R₉₅ values for extract of the torrefied products ranged from 1.7 to 10.2 and 12.4 to 21.9 resp. on mean extracts ranging from 244 to 270 litre °/kg. The r₉₅ and R₉₅ values for colour ranged from 1.6 to 2.3 and 2.2 to 3.8 resp. on mean colours ranging from 2.7 to 3.5 EBC units.     

CO2 Correction Factor for the Net Contents of Containers

A new formula to replace the current EBC formula for the correction of net contents in beer containers for the presence of CO₂ has been derived from a bibliographic study that reviews the influence of carbonation on beer density determinations. The study reviews the relationship between beer density and CO₂ partial molal volume (PMV) as defined by the American Society of Brewing Chemists (ASBC) (ASBC Methods of Analysis Fills‐1 formula) and that given by the European Brewery Convention Analysis Committee (EBC) and shows that in the current EBC equation a CO₂ PMV of 0.65 mL/g and a residual CO₂ content after degassing of 0 v/v or % (m/m) is used. Experimental determination of CO₂ PMV gives values of 0.73 ± 0.01 mL/g for most of the standard European beers as Lager, Pilsener, Premium and Export styles. Residual CO₂ levels after decarbonation were quantified for a series of degassing methods and were found to be between 0.20 to 0.50 v/v average 0.40 v/v or 0.08% (m/m). A new equation for determining the CO₂ correction was then proposed assuming a PMV of 0.73 mL/g and a beer carbonation level of 0.40 v/v or 0.08% (m/m) after normal degassing. The new formula is recommended for inclusion in Analytica‐EBC replacing the current formula.     

DETERMINATION OF LOWER BOILING POINT VOLATILE COMPOUNDS IN BEER BY HEADSPACE GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY — COLLABORATIVE TRIAL

The Analysis Committee has collaboratively tested local routine headspace gas chromatographic methods for the determination of the lower boiling point volatile compounds in beer. The repeatability values (r₉₅) were dependent upon mean concentration (m) for acetaldehyde and alcohols but not for esters, whilst reproducibility values (R₉₅) were dependent upon concentration in all cases. The range of values of m and the estimates of r₉₅ and R₉₅ (mg/litre) for each compound were, respectively: acetaldehyde (5–8, 0.21m, 0.60m); propanol (9–23, 0.25m, 2.5+0.57m); isobutanol (5–22, 0.56+0.085m, 1.7+0.15m); methylbutanols (45–105, 0.14m, 0.22m); ethyl acetate (10–54, 3.1, 2.1+0.29m); isoamyl acetate (0.8–4.7, 0.36, 0.20+0.58m); and ethyl hexanoate (0.13–0.36, 0.073, 0.10+0.91m). No advantage was gained by diluting beer samples containing 9% V/V ethanol to 4% ethanol (used for the calibration mixtures) prior to analysis, but use of a standard method of sample preparation decreased most of the R₉₅ values. No recommendation is made in this interim report.